<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>marine &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/marine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:23:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Microplastics May Carry Toxic Diatom Chemicals That Harm Copepods</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/microplastics-may-carry-toxic-diatom-chemicals-that-harm-copepods/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biofilm formation on plastic debris in oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofilms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological pump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical pathways of microplastic toxicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copepod reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copepods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diatom bioactive chemical production on plastic surfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diatoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental consequences of floating plastic debris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact of microplastics on copepods and marine food webs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-term ecological impacts of microplastic pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine chemical ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine microbial communities on plastic surfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microplastic ingestion effects on marine crustaceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microplastics and marine pollutant transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxylipins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastisphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Role of plastisphere in marine chemical pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skeletonema marinoi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxic chemicals associated with diatom colonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zooplankton]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=204564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review proposes that microplastics colonized by oxylipin-producing diatoms may deliver a hidden chemical stress to copepods on top of the physical harm plastic ingestion already causes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microplastics have long been viewed as one of the most pervasive pollutants of the modern ocean, but a new review published in Discover Ecology suggests their danger may extend well beyond the physical damage plastic particles themselves can inflict. Vincenzo Donnarumma and Ennio Russo, in a mini-review that builds a conceptual framework from hundreds of studies, argue that floating plastic debris may act as a delivery vehicle for potent bioactive chemicals produced by the microscopic diatoms that colonize plastic surfaces. If confirmed, this hidden chemical pathway could magnify the harm that microplastics already impose on copepods, the tiny crustaceans that underpin marine food webs worldwide.</p>
<p>The story begins with the plastisphere, the term coined for the communities of bacteria, algae, fungi, and other microbes that rapidly form biofilms on plastic debris once it enters aquatic environments. Diatoms are consistently among the earliest and most successful colonizers of these artificial surfaces. Because plastics are buoyant, long-lived, and chemically inert compared with natural substrates, they offer diatoms a novel and stable ecological niche in the sunlit surface ocean. Field surveys from the Black Sea to intertidal habitats worldwide, along with laboratory mesocosm experiments, have repeatedly documented genera such as Chaetoceros, Thalassiosira, Skeletonema, Navicula, and Nitzschia dominating plastic-associated biofilms, sometimes outcompeting every other photosynthetic organism on the particle.</p>
<p>What makes this dominance ecologically significant is that many of these same diatom genera are well known as producers of oxylipins, a family of lipid-derived defensive chemicals. When diatom cells are damaged, for example when a copepod crunches them during feeding, enzymes called lipoxygenases are released and convert membrane fatty acids into a diverse array of oxylipins, including polyunsaturated aldehydes and linear oxygenated fatty acids. Decades of laboratory and field research have shown that these compounds are teratogenic to copepods: they reduce egg production, impair hatching success, and can kill nauplii outright, sometimes with devastating effects on entire cohorts. In extreme cases documented in the literature, diets rich in oxylipin-producing diatoms such as Skeletonema marinoi have led to one hundred percent naupliar mortality.</p>
<p>Copepods, meanwhile, occupy a pivotal position in ocean ecology. With roughly thirteen thousand described species, they can make up seventy to ninety percent of mesozooplankton abundance in many regions, forming the critical link between phytoplankton and commercially important fish, marine invertebrates, and even cetaceans. They also play a major role in the ocean carbon cycle, packing organic material into dense fecal pellets that sink rapidly and transporting carbon through their daily vertical migrations. Because copepods passively entrain particles of suitable size into their feeding currents, they readily ingest microplastics that overlap in dimensions with their natural prey such as diatoms, dinoflagellates, and ciliates.</p>
<p>The consequences of this ingestion are well documented. Laboratory studies have shown that exposure to microplastic concentrations as low as fifty particles per milliliter can alter copepod feeding behavior, prey selection, reproductive output, molting cycles, and lipid production. In the copepod Acartia tonsa, polystyrene beads administered during egg formation produced smaller eggs, reduced naupliar survival, and population models projecting a thirty-fold decline over twenty generations. Molecular analyses reveal that microplastic ingestion triggers oxidative stress pathways involving MAPK and Nrf2 signaling, drains cellular energy reserves, and compromises swimming performance. Fecal pellets produced by exposed copepods become smaller and sink more slowly, potentially weakening the biological pump that carries carbon to the deep ocean.</p>
<p>The striking observation at the heart of the new review is that these microplastic effects closely resemble those historically attributed to oxylipin-producing diatoms. Reduced egg viability, impaired hatching, naupliar mortality, and disrupted maternal investment appear in both bodies of literature. Donnarumma and Russo propose that the overlap may not be coincidental. When a copepod ingests a plastic particle densely colonized by diatoms, the mechanical crushing of those cells during digestion could liberate lipoxygenases that then react with polyunsaturated fatty acids from any of the other organisms in the gut, whether eukaryotic or prokaryotic, generating oxylipins on the spot. In effect, the plastic particle would function as a chemical weapon factory inside the grazer.</p>
<p>Biofouling makes this scenario more plausible rather than less. Experiments consistently show that copepods ingest aged, biofilm-coated microplastics more readily than pristine particles, apparently because microbial colonization makes the plastic smell and behave more like food. Biofilm-derived infochemicals can even act as foraging cues that attract grazers. Meanwhile, nutrient limitation, a condition that increases oxylipin production in diatoms, also drives diatoms to over-secrete adhesive extracellular polymeric substances, making their biofilms stickier and more robust on plastic surfaces. The result is a particle that is simultaneously more attractive to copepods and more chemically loaded with potential toxin producers.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to stress that no study has yet directly demonstrated oxylipin synthesis by epiplastic diatoms on plastic debris. Their framework remains a hypothesis, albeit one grounded in converging lines of indirect evidence. To test it, they propose a clear experimental roadmap: culture an oxylipin-producing species such as Skeletonema marinoi on plastic debris, extract and characterize the resulting metabolites using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and compare copepod responses to sterile versus diatom-colonized particles. Adult females would be exposed to four treatments, healthy diets, free-living diatoms, sterile microplastics, and colonized microplastics, with hatching success and gene expression serving as key endpoints. Field surveys using fine neuston nets, rather than the standard manta nets that miss the relevant size fractions, would then establish whether the mechanism operates in nature.</p>
<p>The stakes extend well beyond copepod physiology. If plastic-borne oxylipins compound the reproductive failures already observed in laboratory studies, population-level consequences could ripple upward through marine food webs, reducing prey availability for fish larvae and other consumers. Disruption of copepod-mediated carbon export could further alter the efficiency of the biological pump, with implications for climate-relevant biogeochemical cycles. The authors also highlight a glaring geographic bias in existing research toward the Northern Hemisphere, leaving the Southern Ocean and much of the tropics as data deserts in which the combined stress of microplastics and epiplastic chemistry remains entirely unquantified.</p>
<p>For now, the review reframes microplastic pollution as a dual threat: a physical and nutritional burden on grazers, and a potential vector for chemical stress generated by the living communities that plastics carry with them. Whether that second threat is real in the ocean will depend on the experimental and field campaigns the authors now call for, but the convergence of evidence they assemble makes the hypothesis one of the most intriguing new directions in marine chemical ecology.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microplastics as potential vectors of diatom-derived oxylipins affecting copepod physiology and reproduction</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Microplastics as potential vectors of diatom oxylipins and possible effects on copepods</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Donnarumma, V., &amp; Russo, E. (2026). Microplastics as potential vectors of diatom oxylipins and possible effects on copepods. <em>Discover Ecology, 2</em>(1), Article 11. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00029-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00029-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00029-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44396-026-00029-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> microplastics, plastisphere, diatoms, oxylipins, copepods, marine chemical ecology, biofilms, copepod reproduction, biological pump, marine pollution, Skeletonema marinoi, zooplankton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">204564</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Environmental structuring of mixoplankton functional types within marine protist communities: a global analysis</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/environmental-structuring-of-mixoplankton-functional-types-within-marine-protist-communities-a-global-analysis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 20:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA metabarcoding of ocean microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental drivers of plankton communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global ocean plankton analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning in oceanography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine protist functional types]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial community structure in oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixoplankton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mixoplankton distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mixotrophic marine microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient and temperature gradients in marine ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean microbiome mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protist functional diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of mixoplankton in marine food webs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structuring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[types]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[within]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=186716</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the sunlit layers of the world ocean, a remarkable group of microscopic organisms quietly blurs the boundary between plant and animal. Known as mixoplankton, these single-celled protists can both photosynthesize like algae and engulf prey like predators, and a]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the sunlit layers of the world ocean, a remarkable group of microscopic organisms quietly blurs the boundary between plant and animal. Known as mixoplankton, these single-celled protists can both photosynthesize like algae and engulf prey like predators, and a new global analysis has now mapped, with unprecedented breadth, where each of their distinct functional types lives and why. By combining tens of thousands of DNA sequences from across the planet with machine learning and classical oceanographic statistics, an international research team has shown that these versatile microbes are not ecological curiosities at the margins of marine food webs but ubiquitous, environmentally structured players whose distributions follow temperature, salinity, and nutrient gradients with striking consistency.</p>
<p>The study, published in the journal Ocean Microbiology, drew on the metaPR2 database, a curated collection of processed 18S rRNA gene metabarcodes from more than forty studies spanning thousands of samples worldwide. The researchers classified roughly 47,000 marine protist amplicon sequence variants, or ASVs, into functional categories using the Mixoplankton Database, a resource that catalogues known mixotrophic species and their trophic strategies. Four mixoplankton types emerged as the focus of the analysis: constitutive mixoplankton, which build their own chloroplasts; generalist non-constitutive mixoplankton, which steal chloroplasts from a broad range of prey; plastidic specialist non-constitutive mixoplankton, which selectively retain plastids and even nuclear material from specific prey for weeks or months; and endosymbiotic specialist non-constitutive mixoplankton, which harbor long-term photosynthetic symbionts inside their cells.</p>
<p>These distinctions matter because each strategy carries different physiological costs and ecological consequences. Constitutive mixoplankton, which include familiar dinoflagellate and haptophyte genera such as Alexandrium, Karlodinium, and Karenia, can photosynthesize continuously while opportunistically consuming prey. Generalists of the non-constitutive kind, such as ciliates in the genera Strombidium and Laboea, must feed frequently, on scales of hours to days, because their stolen plastids degrade quickly. Plastidic specialists such as Mesodinium and Dinophysis can maintain sequestered photosynthetic machinery for extended periods, while endosymbiotic specialists like Ornithocercus and the green form of Noctiluca scintillans sustain stable partnerships with algal cells that contribute sugars and recycle nutrients derived from prey digestion.</p>
<p>After filtering the data to euphotic-zone samples, those from the upper 200 meters where light penetrates, the final dataset comprised nearly 44,000 ASVs and more than 366 million reads from 4,190 samples reaching latitudes from roughly 74 degrees south to 89 degrees north. Mixoplankton appeared in 94 percent of the samples, confirming their global ubiquity. Overall, mixoplankton accounted for about 7 percent of protist ASVs, corresponding to 3,537 sequence variants and 192 species, which represents some 44 percent of the species listed in the Mixoplankton Database. Protozooplankton and parasites dominated the ASV counts at 38 and 24 percent respectively, while diatoms made up 8 percent and other phytoplankton 22 percent.</p>
<p>To untangle the patterns hidden within this enormous dataset, the team turned to self-organizing maps, an unsupervised machine learning technique that condenses thousands of ASV abundance profiles into two-dimensional neuronal grids that can then be hierarchically clustered. Because sequencing methodology, particularly the choice between the V4 and V9 hypervariable regions of the 18S rRNA gene and the seawater filtration strategy, strongly shapes recovered community composition, the researchers deliberately analyzed separate subdatasets defined by consistent methods rather than pooling everything together. The clustering, applied independently to three subdatasets, each explained between 75 and 78 percent of total variance and produced community groupings that aligned with four major oceanic biomes: polar, subpolar to temperate, temperate to subtropical, and subtropical to tropical.</p>
<p>Those biome assignments were far from arbitrary. Principal component ordination and temperature-salinity-nitrate diagrams showed that the machine learning clusters ordered themselves consistently along environmental gradients of temperature, salinity, and nitrate concentration, with statistical tests confirming significant differences among clusters. Polar and subpolar communities were associated with the coldest waters and highest nitrate levels, while temperate, subtropical, and tropical communities corresponded with warmer, nutrient-poor conditions. Salinity played a comparatively weaker structural role, likely because it varies over a relatively narrow range in marine waters. The resulting biogeography matched classical oceanographic regions described in earlier plankton studies, lending confidence to the approach.</p>
<p>Within this framework, each mixoplankton functional type revealed its own ecological signature. Constitutive mixoplankton were broadly distributed across all biomes and showed distributional patterns closely paralleling those of non-diatom phytoplankton, suggesting either functional overlap or shared resource use between the two groups. Generalized additive models, which can capture non-linear relationships, showed that constitutive mixoplankton reached high relative abundances across a wide temperature span from near zero to 30 degrees Celsius, typical oceanic salinities, and low nitrate concentrations, consistent with the idea that mixotrophy confers a competitive advantage when dissolved nutrients are scarce. Endosymbiotic specialists, by contrast, were restricted to warmer subpolar through tropical waters and were largely absent from polar regions, with more than 88 percent of their sequence variants in one subdataset belonging to Collodaria, radiolarian colonies characteristic of oligotrophic open oceans.</p>
<p>The remaining two mixotypes were scarcer but ecologically revealing. Generalist non-constitutive mixoplankton, the least abundant group, consistently co-occurred with diatoms and extended into nitrate-rich regimes of 20 to 30 micromolar, echoing their dependence on frequent ingestion of phototrophic prey that flourish in productive waters; they were also detected in upwelling zones such as the equatorial Pacific and the Agulhas Current. Plastidic specialists spanned all biomes but were sparse, and in this study appeared in lower-nutrient conditions than previously reported, a shift the authors attribute to seasonal sampling differences and the capacity of retained plastids to sustain photosynthesis across varying nutrient regimes. Diatoms themselves, the only protists confidently confirmed as strictly phototrophic, were predominantly tied to cold, nitrate-rich waters, while protozooplankton and parasites displayed trends generally inverse to those of the mixoplankton, hinting at partitioned consumer niches and host-driven distributions.</p>
<p>The analysis also exposed how profoundly methodological choices shape what scientists see. Mixoplankton richness and relative abundance were, respectively, threefold and sixfold higher in the V9 dataset than in the V4 dataset, largely because the Tara Oceans V9 data captured radiolarians whose exceptionally high rRNA gene copy numbers are differentially amplified by the two marker regions. Comparisons of samples sequenced with both markers showed roughly 60 percent species overlap and significantly correlated abundances, yet one endosymbiotic radiolarian, Collozoum amoeboides, appeared three orders of magnitude more abundant in V9 than in V4. Filtration strategy added further complications, since fragile cells can be disrupted during size fractionation while unfractionated samples can mask rarer groups. The authors stress that these discrepancies do not undermine the conclusions but underscore the need for careful, method-aware interpretation.</p>
<p>By placing mixoplankton within the full context of marine protistan communities at a global scale, the study delivers the first community-level assessment of mixoplankton biogeography relative to co-occurring functional types, and it establishes an empirical foundation for incorporating these organisms into predictive models of marine ecosystem dynamics. The researchers argue that future work should prioritize targeted detection of the underrepresented generalist and plastidic specialist types, whose sparse detection partly reflects their small numbers of known species and the fragility of their cells, and should embrace emerging transcriptomic machine learning methods that can infer trophic mode from gene expression in field communities. As oceans warm and nutrient cycles shift, knowing which mixoplankton strategies dominate where, and under what environmental conditions, may prove essential for forecasting how marine food webs and biogeochemical cycles will respond.</p>
<p>The recognition of mixoplankton as a distinct ecological category represents a relatively recent shift in plankton science. For much of the twentieth century, marine protists were sorted into a simple dichotomy of phytoplankton and zooplankton, an arrangement that implicitly assumed photosynthesis and phagotrophy were mutually exclusive trophic modes. Observations of planktonic ciliates carrying algal plastids and dinoflagellates consuming prey date back more than a century, but only with the development of trait-based frameworks and curated databases has the full diversity of these strategies become systematically catalogued.</p>
<p>The ecological stakes of this reclassification are considerable. Because mixoplankton can acquire nutrients through both dissolved uptake and prey ingestion, they occupy a flexible position in microbial food webs, capable of acting as primary producers when inorganic nutrients are scarce and as grazers when prey are abundant. This dual capacity influences how carbon and nitrogen move through planktonic communities, and models that omit mixotrophy risk misallocating energy flow and nutrient recycling pathways.</p>
<p>The global niche patterns documented in the study also carry implications for a changing ocean. As surface waters warm and stratification intensifies, nutrient supply to the euphotic zone is expected to decline in many regions, conditions that favor organisms able to supplement photosynthesis with feeding. The observed affinity of constitutive mixoplankton for warm, oligotrophic waters, and of endosymbiotic specialists for tropical and subtropical biomes, suggests that these groups may expand as such conditions become more widespread, potentially reshaping community composition and the efficiency of biological carbon export.</p>
<p>Equally important is the methodological legacy of the work. By demonstrating that marker gene choice and sample processing measurably alter perceived mixoplankton abundance, the analysis provides a cautionary benchmark for future metabarcoding surveys and underscores the value of standardized, method-aware databases for tracking marine biodiversity over time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Environmental structuring of mixoplankton functional types within marine protist communities: a global analysis</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Environmental structuring of mixoplankton functional types within marine protist communities: a global analysis</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Larsson, M. E., Leles, S. G., Mitra, A., Faure, E., Vaulot, D., &amp; Santoferrera, L. (2026). Environmental structuring of mixoplankton functional types within marine protist communities: a global analysis. <em>Ocean Microbiology, 2</em>(1), Article 1. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44375-026-00007-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s44375-026-00007-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44375-026-00007-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s44375-026-00007-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Environmental, structuring, mixoplankton, functional, types, within, marine, protist, communities, global, analysis, scientific research</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">186716</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
