<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>marine ice-sheet instability &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/marine-ice-sheet-instability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:06:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Hidden Warm Water Is Eating Away at East Antarctica&#8217;s Porpoise Bay Glaciers</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hidden-warm-water-is-eating-away-at-east-antarcticas-porpoise-bay-glaciers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 10:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic ice sheet stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic sea level rise contribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurora Subglacial Basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circumpolar deep water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic thinning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Antarctic Ice Sheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Antarctic Ice Sheet vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Antarctica ice sheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glacier flow acceleration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grounding line retreat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice sheet thinning and retreat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice shelf calving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term Antarctic ice data analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine ice-sheet instability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean-driven ice loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porpoise Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porpoise Bay glaciers retreat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite ice monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite remote sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea level rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subglacial melting in Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilkes Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilkes Land ice dynamics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=253177</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study finds that glaciers draining into Porpoise Bay in East Antarctica are thinning, retreating and speeding up as warm Circumpolar Deep Water intrudes beneath their ice shelves, exposing a potentially unstable sector of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For decades, the East Antarctic Ice Sheet has been treated as the stable sibling in Antarctica&#8217;s family of ice, a vast frozen reservoir assumed to be largely insulated from the ocean-driven losses that have battered West Antarctica and the Antarctic Peninsula. A new study published in The Cryosphere by Matilda Weatherley of Durham University and colleagues now adds weight to a growing body of evidence that this confidence may be misplaced. By combining satellite imagery, radar interferometry, altimetry and ocean data spanning more than six decades, the team has documented thinning ice, retreating grounding lines and accelerating flow at the outlet glaciers draining into Porpoise Bay, a 150-kilometre-wide embayment in Wilkes Land that sits atop the eastern Aurora Subglacial Basin, one of the most potentially unstable regions of the entire ice sheet.</p>
<p>The stakes are considerable. The Antarctic Ice Sheet as a whole holds the equivalent of 57.9 metres of global sea level rise, and the East Antarctic Ice Sheet alone accounts for 52.2 metres of that total, an order of magnitude more than its western counterpart. While West Antarctica has dominated headlines with losses concentrated around Pine Island and Thwaites glaciers, Wilkes Land has quietly emerged as the region of East Antarctica losing the most mass. Previous work identified Frost and Holmes glaciers, both of which drain into Porpoise Bay, as among the top contributors to cumulative ice loss in East Antarctica between 1979 and 2017, behind only Totten and Denman glaciers. Yet despite this signal, the glaciers of Porpoise Bay had never been examined in the detail that their importance demands.</p>
<p>Weatherley and her colleagues set out to close that gap by measuring four key parameters across four outlet glaciers: Frost, Holmes East, Holmes West, and a smaller flow feature the team calls Glacier 1. They mapped the position of the ice-shelf calving fronts using imagery from Landsat, ASTER and Sentinel satellites, extending the record back to 1963 with declassified ARGON photography. They tracked ice surface elevation using multiple satellite altimetry datasets, measured ice velocity from the ITS_LIVE product, and located the grounding lines, the critical boundary where grounded ice begins to float, using differential synthetic aperture radar interferometry, or DInSAR, supplemented by a neural network trained to delineate grounding lines automatically from interferograms.</p>
<p>The results reveal a pattern of change that is hard to dismiss as noise. Frost Glacier&#8217;s grounding line retreated 17.17 kilometres between 1996 and 2014, an average rate of roughly 0.95 kilometres per year, with the fastest retreat, more than two kilometres per year, occurring between 1996 and 2004. Holmes East Glacier retreated up to 15.24 kilometres in just five years at the start of that period. If the estimates hold, Frost would rank among the fastest-retreating glaciers in East Antarctica on decadal timescales, with rates comparable to those recorded at Thwaites and Pine Island glaciers in West Antarctica. The authors are careful to flag substantial uncertainties, since the comparison combines datasets that delineate different parts of the grounding zone using different methods, but the retreat is broadly consistent with independent estimates from other studies.</p>
<p>The thinning signal is equally striking. Between 2003 and 2017, the grounded ice at Holmes West Glacier lowered at an average rate of up to 1.22 metres per year at the grounding line, a figure that places it among the most rapidly thinning glaciers in East Antarctica, rivalled in the published record only by Totten Glacier. The thinning propagated inland, reaching 0.34 metres per year ten kilometres up-ice, a spatial pattern characteristic of dynamic thinning driven by changes at the coast rather than by shifts in local snowfall. Because no long-term trends in precipitation or firn densification have been reported for the region, the researchers attribute the elevation loss to the ice itself flowing faster and drawing down its surface, a hallmark of dynamically forced mass loss.</p>
<p>What is driving these changes? The evidence points firmly toward the ocean. Warm, salty modified Circumpolar Deep Water, or mCDW, was detected at the continental shelf break near Porpoise Bay through measurements collected by instrumented seals from the MEOP consortium and by Argo profiling floats between 2004 and 2021. The water masses observed there, with temperatures above freezing at depth and salinities exceeding 34.5 grams per kilogram, match the signature of mCDW in East Antarctica. Reanalysis data from the EN4 dataset further suggest that water warmer than zero degrees Celsius has been present below roughly 450 metres depth on the continental shelf since at least the 1990s. Crucially, gravity-derived bathymetry reveals deep sub-ice-shelf cavities, between 650 and 750 metres deep and deepening inland, beneath Frost, Holmes East and Holmes West glaciers, providing plausible pathways for this warm water to reach the ice from below.</p>
<p>The melt rates implied by this oceanic heat delivery are extraordinary. Previous work calculated an average basal melt rate of 13.3 metres per year beneath the Holmes Ice Shelf between 1994 and 2018, the highest of any ice shelf in East Antarctica and fourth highest in all of Antarctica, exceeding even the melt rate beneath the Totten Ice Shelf. The ice shelf has also been thinning at its surface, with satellite altimetry recording losses of up to 3.07 metres per year on the floating ice, and pinning-point analysis suggests the thinning began at least fifty years ago. The picture that emerges is one of warm water circulating beneath the ice, melting it from below, thinning the floating tongues, reducing their buttressing effect, and allowing the grounded glaciers upstream to accelerate, thin and retreat.</p>
<p>The study also documents a striking rhythm of calving. The ice shelves of Porpoise Bay underwent near-synchronous calving events in 2006 to 2008, again in 2016 to 2017, and in a previously unidentified episode in 2021 to 2022, each time advancing back to within about a kilometre of their previous maximum extent before calving again. The team found that these events coincided with unusually low sea-ice concentrations in the preceding winter and spring, and with the break-up of the iceberg mélange, the jumble of sea ice and icebergs that presses against the ice front. Sea ice and mélange exert a resistive backstress on calving fronts, and their removal has been linked to ice-shelf breakup elsewhere in Antarctica. Because calving events at Porpoise Bay removed more than the roughly 18 percent of ice-shelf area that modelling identifies as dynamically passive, the losses translated into measurable speed-ups of the glaciers behind them, with velocity increases of several percent following the largest events.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential finding concerns Holmes West Glacier. Its grounding line currently rests on a local bedrock high that appears to have shielded it from the full force of the warm water, which may explain its comparatively modest retreat rate of around 70 metres per year. But that pinning point sits at the very edge of a steep retrograde bed. Within two kilometres of inland retreat, the bed drops by 650 to 700 metres, and different bathymetric datasets suggest the reverse slope may continue for 25 to 35 kilometres inland. If the glacier unpins from its bedrock high, which the authors suggest could happen within a decade at current retreat rates, warm water would gain access to deep grounded ice, potentially initiating marine ice sheet instability, the same self-reinforcing retreat mechanism feared at Thwaites Glacier. The Holmes catchment holds the equivalent of roughly 11 centimetres of global sea level rise, and an adjacent ice rise that currently buttresses the flow could also lose its grip.</p>
<p>The authors emphasise that urgent improvements to bed elevation data are needed before the region&#8217;s future can be modelled with confidence, since the bathymetric uncertainties in this poorly surveyed corner of Antarctica are large enough to change the prognosis entirely. Nevertheless, the convergence of evidence, thinning that propagates inland, grounding lines retreating across retrograde slopes, modest but persistent flow acceleration, warm water at the shelf break, and deep cavities connecting ocean to ice, paints a coherent picture of a region responding to oceanic forcing. As Antarctic sea ice enters an era of record lows and increasing anomaly persistence, the stabilising seasonal blanket that has repeatedly broken and reformed over Porpoise Bay may grow thinner and less reliable. What happens next at these unassuming glaciers could help determine how much of East Antarctica&#8217;s enormous ice reservoir stays put in a warming world.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Ocean-driven dynamic thinning and grounding line retreat at outlet glaciers in Porpoise Bay, Wilkes Land, East Antarctica</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Dynamic thinning and grounding line retreat in Porpoise Bay, Wilkes Land, East Antarctica</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Weatherley, M., Stokes, C. R., Jamieson, S. S. R., Ramanath, S., &amp; Silvano, A. (2026). Dynamic thinning and grounding line retreat in Porpoise Bay, Wilkes Land, East Antarctica. <em>The Cryosphere, 20</em>(9), 5509-5532. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-5509-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-5509-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-5509-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.5194/tc-20-5509-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> East Antarctic Ice Sheet, Porpoise Bay, Wilkes Land, grounding line retreat, dynamic thinning, Circumpolar Deep Water, ice shelf calving, sea ice, marine ice sheet instability, Aurora Subglacial Basin, satellite remote sensing, sea level rise</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">253177</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden Landscape Beneath Antarctica&#8217;s Denman Glacier Revealed by Gravity</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hidden-landscape-beneath-antarcticas-denman-glacier-revealed-by-gravity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Green]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 21:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic glacier bed mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic ice sheet stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BedMachine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bedmap3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep continental marine troughs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denman Glacier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denman Glacier submarine trough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Antarctic Ice Sheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future sea-level rise predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geostatistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravity inversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gravity-based geophysical surveys in Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grounding line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice sheet bedrock topography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of glacier retreat on sea-level rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications of glacier fragmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine ice-sheet instability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine-based ice sheet dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Markov chain Monte Carlo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radar ice thickness measurement challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radio-echo sounding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea level rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subglacial topography]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=249853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new ensemble-based gravity inversion, combining ground-based and airborne measurements, reveals that the bed beneath East Antarctica's Denman Glacier is far more rugged and segmented than existing maps suggest, reinforcing the glacier's vulnerability to unstable retreat and up to 1.5 meters of potential sea-level rise.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath the ice of East Antarctica lies one of the most consequential pieces of real estate on the planet: the trough carved beneath the Denman Glacier, a fast-moving outlet of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet that channels ice from the deep interior toward the Shackleton Ice Shelf. New research published in The Cryosphere by Mareen Lösing of the University of Western Australia and colleagues has now redrawn the map of this hidden world, and the picture it paints is more rugged, more fragmented, and more worrying than anything currently found in the standard Antarctic bed atlases. The Denman Glacier is modeled to host the deepest continental marine trough in East Antarctica, and if it were to retreat irreversibly, it could ultimately raise global sea level by roughly 1.5 meters. Knowing the precise shape of the bed beneath it is therefore not an academic nicety; it is a first-order input into any credible forecast of future sea-level rise.</p>
<p>The problem that motivated the study is a familiar one in polar science: radar, the workhorse tool for measuring ice thickness, struggles in exactly the places where the answers matter most. Radio-echo sounding works beautifully over gentle, well-behaved beds, but the Denman Glacier Trough is deep, narrow, and steep-walled, roughly 20 kilometers wide and 110 kilometers long, and its flanks generate off-nadir echoes and layover that scramble the return signal. Crevasse fields near the grounding line scatter the pulse, warm or water-saturated basal sediments attenuate it, and beneath the floating ice shelf the ocean simply swallows the radar beam entirely. As a result, bed observations in the region are sparse and unevenly distributed, and the continent-scale compilations that most ice sheet models rely upon, BedMachine and the newer Bedmap3, must interpolate or extrapolate across large gaps. Interpolation smooths sharp relief and can bridge across steep troughs, underestimating both depth and the steepness of the sidewalls, while mass-conservation methods that fuse radar thickness with satellite velocities can recover deep troughs but remain highly non-unique where surface velocity gradients are small.</p>
<p>To break this impasse, the team turned to a completely independent physical signal: gravity. During the Australian Denman Terrestrial Campaign in the 2023/24 austral summer, the researchers hauled a Scintrex CG-5 Autograv gravimeter across the ice surface, collecting nine high-precision gravity measurements along a roughly 14-kilometer transect that crosses the deepest part of the trough, with stations spaced about 1.7 kilometers apart. Ground-based gravity has a crucial advantage over airborne surveys: because the instrument sits on the ice rather than flying kilometers above it, it retains the short-wavelength gravity signals that airborne data lose to mandatory filtering and upward continuation. The team tied their readings to the absolute gravity reference at Casey Station, corrected for instrument drift using repeated base measurements at Bunger Hills, and computed free-air anomalies on the WGS84 ellipsoid with careful solid-Earth tide and atmospheric-pressure corrections. These ground data were then merged with the extensive ICECAP airborne gravity, magnetic, and radar archive collected between 2008 and 2018.</p>
<p>The heart of the method is a two-scale, ensemble-based gravity inversion built on a Markov Chain Monte Carlo framework. Gravity inversion is notoriously non-unique, meaning an infinite family of density and depth combinations can reproduce the same measured anomaly, so the authors attacked the ambiguity head-on. First, they used sequential Gaussian simulation, a geostatistical technique, to generate an ensemble of plausible non-terrain gravity disturbances, the long-wavelength background signal produced by regional geology rather than by the bed itself. A smooth regional trend was fitted to locations with reliable radar-based topographic control, the residuals were characterized with a directional variogram, and hundreds of statistically realistic residual fields were simulated. Subtracting each of these from the isostatically corrected gravity disturbance yielded an ensemble of target terrain effects, one hundred for the regional inversion at 2-kilometer resolution and fifty for the high-resolution local inversion at 1-kilometer resolution focused on the trough.</p>
<p>Each terrain effect was then fed into a random-walk Metropolis-Hastings MCMC inversion. Starting from a BedMachine-based bed plus a smooth Gaussian perturbation, the algorithm repeatedly proposed small, spatially correlated Gaussian patches of bed change, recomputed the forward gravity response only where it mattered for efficiency, and accepted or rejected each proposal using a joint likelihood that weighs both the gravity misfit and the radar bed picks, with adopted uncertainties of 1.5 mGal for gravity and 30 meters for radar. By progressing from large update stencils to small ones, the multiscale scheme captured the long-wavelength geometry first and then layered on finer detail. The result is not a single map but an ensemble of bed realizations, each internally consistent with the data, together with a standard-deviation field that honestly quantifies where the bed is well constrained and where it remains contested. Ensemble spread is low, below about 200 meters, where radar and gravity jointly constrain the bed, and climbs above 900 meters along the steep, poorly imaged trough interior.</p>
<p>What the ensemble reveals is a fundamentally different landscape from the one in the standard products. Where BedMachine and Bedmap3 depict the Denman trunk as a single, continuous, elongated depression, the gravity-derived reconstruction shows a compartmentalized, rugged terrain: multiple localized depressions and pockets of varying depth, subdued ridges, and steeper trough walls with greater lateral relief than either compilation. Along cross-trough profiles near the grounding line, the best-fit gravity bed generally falls between the shallower Bedmap3 and the deeper BedMachine interpretations, yet consistently exhibits sharper, more sharply defined geometry than either. Perhaps most strikingly, the ensemble hints at a subdued bedrock high within the central trough that may partition it into two connected basins, and it traces a deep, trough-like channel continuing beneath the ice shelf, a feature resolved by neither BedMachine nor Bedmap3 because no radar data exist there. The best-fit gravity model reproduces the observed gravity field with a mean absolute error of 1.6 mGal and honors the radar picks to within about 100 meters across most of the domain.</p>
<p>The geology beneath the ice adds a second layer of insight. Using Euler deconvolution of reprocessed ICECAP magnetic data, the team estimated the depth to magnetic sources across the region. On the western flank of the trough, magnetic sources lie several kilometers deep, consistent with crystalline basement, while the eastern side shows subdued magnetic responses characteristic of sedimentary or metasedimentary units. A cluster of subvertically aligned magnetic-source solutions in the central profile suggests a steeply dipping fault zone, likely a lithological boundary separating the two terranes, lying within 1 to 2 kilometers of the previously proposed Scott Fault. The Denman Glacier Trough, the authors argue, appears to exploit this ancient structural weakness, echoing earlier work suggesting that a mechanically weak, potentially water-saturated sedimentary bed along the Knox Rift, a failed rift from the separation of India from East Gondwana with up to 6 to 7 kilometers of infill, helped focus ice flow into this corridor.</p>
<p>The dynamical implications are sobering. Because much of the Denman system is grounded below sea level, its stability hinges on bed geometry through the mechanism known as Marine Ice Sheet Instability. When a grounding line retreats onto a bed that slopes downward inland, the ice at the grounding line becomes thicker, the outflow flux increases nonlinearly with thickness, and retreat feeds on itself in a positive feedback loop. The gravity-derived geometry, with its steep flanks, retrograde inland-sloping basin, and strong asymmetry, reinforces the glacier&#8217;s susceptibility to this instability, although the authors are careful to note that geometry alone cannot prove instability is underway; pinning points such as along- and across-trough ridges could temporarily stabilize the grounding line by adding basal and lateral drag. The observed context is already unsettling: the glacier&#8217;s grounded portion has accelerated by 174 percent over the past five decades, and its grounding line has retreated more than 5 kilometers since 1996.</p>
<p>Beyond Denman itself, the study carries a broader message for Antarctic science. Ice sheet models are only as good as the bed maps beneath them, and the discrepancies between the gravity-constrained geometry and widely used compilations suggest that many current models may rely on overly smoothed bed representations, potentially underestimating grounding line sensitivity in fast-flowing outlet systems where modest bed changes translate into major dynamical consequences. The authors argue that geophysical inversion methods deserve a place alongside radar interpolation and mass conservation in future continental bed-mapping efforts, and their ensemble of bed realizations is immediately usable as boundary conditions for ice-flow modeling and grounding-line stability assessments. As the team points out, well-placed new constraints, whether longer ground gravity profiles, magnetotelluric soundings, or seismic data, would do more to sharpen the picture than modest noise reductions. For now, the hidden landscape beneath Denman Glacier stands revealed in sharper relief than ever before, and its steep, segmented, seaward-plunging geometry is a reminder that some of the biggest uncertainties in sea-level projections lie buried under kilometers of ice.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Geostatistical gravity inversion of subglacial topography beneath the Denman Glacier, East Antarctica</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Gravity topography modeling of the Denman Glacier region using a geostatistical approach</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Lösing, M., Aitken, A., Field, M., MacKie, E., &amp; Li, L. (2026). Gravity topography modeling of the Denman Glacier region using a geostatistical approach. <em>The Cryosphere, 20</em>(10), 5629-5652. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-5629-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-5629-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-5629-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.5194/tc-20-5629-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Denman Glacier, East Antarctica, subglacial topography, gravity inversion, Markov Chain Monte Carlo, radio-echo sounding, BedMachine, Bedmap3, Marine Ice Sheet Instability, sea-level rise, grounding line, geostatistics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">249853</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antarctica Is Locked In to Sea-Level Rise by 2100, Machine-Learning Study Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/antarctica-is-locked-in-to-sea-level-rise-by-2100-machine-learning-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas Green]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 11:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic contribution to global sea level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic Ice Sheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic ice sheet melting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayesian calibration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change adaptation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change Impact on Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coastal risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of greenhouse gas emission scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emissions scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice shelf melt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice-sheet model uncertainties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice-sheet modelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications of irreversible ice loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISMIP6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISMIP6 climate models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term sea-level rise predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine-learning in climate modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine ice-sheet instability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea level rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea level rise projections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea-level rise by 2100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sliding laws]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=247454</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A machine-learning analysis of ice-sheet model ensembles shows the Antarctic Ice Sheet is very likely committed to mass loss by 2100 even under the most aggressive emissions cuts, with high-emissions pathways capable of driving up to 25.4 centimetres of sea-level rise.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Antarctic Ice Sheet, Earth&#8217;s largest reservoir of freshwater and the equivalent of 57.9 metres of potential global sea-level rise, is now very likely committed to losing mass through the end of this century no matter how aggressively humanity cuts emissions, according to a new study published in Nature Geoscience. Using a machine-learning emulation framework trained on the Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP6), researchers led by Yucheng Lin of City University of Hong Kong and CSIRO Environment quantified, for the first time, how each individual physical assumption in ice-sheet models cascades into projection uncertainty. Their observation-calibrated results suggest a probability of at least 0.92 that the ice sheet continues losing mass by 2100 even under the most ambitious emissions-reduction scenario, SSP1-1.9, rising to at least 0.95 under the very high-emissions SSP5-8.5 pathway.</p>
<p>The central problem the team tackled is that Antarctic sea-level projections have long been dominated by a bewildering spread of outcomes. In ISMIP6, the flagship model intercomparison feeding into the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, projections of the Antarctic contribution to sea-level rise by 2100 under SSP5-8.5 ranged from less than minus 7 centimetres to more than 40 centimetres of sea-level equivalent, with models outside the exercise suggesting an even broader range. Traditional intercomparison exercises follow a &#8216;one model, one vote&#8217; approach, which can bias ensemble results towards whichever modelling choices happen to be adopted by more research groups, regardless of their physical plausibility or consistency with observations. Until now, the contribution of each individual modelling decision to that spread had never been systematically disentangled.</p>
<p>To break the problem open, the researchers built a statistical emulator that mimics the behaviour of computationally expensive numerical ice-sheet models. They compiled a database of 340 ISMIP6-2300 simulations from 41 model submissions, spanning 29,240 samples across 86 annual time steps, and characterised each simulation with 21 features: 18 ice-dynamical modelling choices, plus the driving atmosphere-ocean general circulation model, the emissions scenario and the projection year. After testing six machine-learning algorithms with tenfold cross validation, they adopted Gradient Boosting, which sequentially builds decision trees that each correct the errors of the last. The emulator achieved a coefficient of determination of 0.98, outperforming previous long-short-term-memory and Gaussian-process emulators, and its 95 per cent credible intervals captured 95.5 per cent of true simulation values. Running at roughly 30,000 samples per second on a laptop, it allowed the team to generate ensembles of half a million projections that would have been computationally impossible with full numerical models.</p>
<p>The variance decomposition delivered a striking verdict: in raw, uncorrected simulations, ice-model features dominate twenty-first-century Antarctic uncertainty, accounting for an average of 64 per cent of projection variance. Sliding laws, the equations relating basal shear stress to sliding velocity at the ice-bed interface, alone contributed 21 per cent of the variance between 2015 and 2100. A Budd-type sliding law yielded 5.0 plus or minus 4.2 centimetres more sea-level rise by 2100 than a linear Weertman law. Ice-shelf melt parameterizations, which translate coarse ocean warming signals into spatially variable basal melt beneath floating ice, contributed another 20 per cent; an observation-calibrated linear thermal forcing function produced 7.8 plus or minus 5.2 centimetres more than the ISMIP6 standard non-local parameterization. Numerical choices mattered too: running models at 1-kilometre resolution instead of 8 kilometres reduced projected sea-level rise by 4.3 plus or minus 2.8 centimetres, because fine grids better resolve the topography controlling ice streams and grounding-line migration.</p>
<p>The picture changes when drift-corrected simulations are used, in which each model&#8217;s control-run variability is subtracted to isolate the dynamical response to climate change. Because control-run variability accounts for 45 per cent of raw-simulation variance, removing it cuts ice-model feature uncertainty to 23 per cent and elevates climate forcing to nearly half of the total, with the choice of atmosphere-ocean model contributing 31 per cent and global mean surface temperature 17 per cent. The team also quantified how the spatial geometry of Antarctic mass loss, which generates gravitational, rotational and deformational sea-level fingerprints, adds location-specific uncertainty. For London and Singapore the fingerprint effect contributes less than 1 per cent of variance, rising to 5 per cent in New York and 3 per cent in Shanghai, but near the ice sheet itself it becomes a major factor, reaching 17 per cent in Buenos Aires and 21 per cent in Melbourne.</p>
<p>Probing the relationship between warming and ice loss, the study found it to be delayed, non-stationary and strongly nonlinear. Distinguishable differences between emissions scenarios in Antarctic sea-level contribution emerge only late in the century, long after global temperature trajectories diverge, reflecting the substantial forcing needed to initiate mass loss and the lag between climate perturbation and dynamical response. By 2100, the sensitivity of Antarctic sea-level rise to warming more than an order of magnitude higher in the calibrated high-end analysis: from 0.56 plus or minus 0.01 centimetres per degree Celsius at 0 to 2 degrees of warming to 5.97 plus or minus 0.01 centimetres per degree at 2 to 4.5 degrees. The choice of climate model also exerts dominant control over whether Antarctica gains or loses mass by 2100. Notably, UKESM1-0-LL, the model producing the highest twenty-first-century warming of any tested, yields net mass gain from enhanced snowfall and modest regional ocean warming, a transient gain the authors caution is confined to this century before sustained ocean-driven dynamic losses overtake surface accumulation.</p>
<p>A key innovation was Bayesian calibration against satellite observations. Many raw ISMIP6 simulations fail to reproduce observed mass-loss trends or exhibit unrealistic model drift, partly because they are initialised to fit static rather than transient observations. The team updated their prior assumptions using the observed 2002-2021 Antarctic mass-loss rate of 0.44 plus or minus 0.04 millimetres per year of sea-level equivalent, measured by the GRACE and GRACE Follow-On gravimetry missions. Calibration reduced projection uncertainty by 30 to 42 per cent and raised median projections by 15 to 25 per cent, while the posterior probabilities shifted decisively against sliding-law formulations, such as pseudo-plastic and Budd variants, that produce unrealistically fast ice flow. Crucially, the calibrated projections raise the probability of committed mass loss under SSP1-1.9 from 0.80 to 0.92, indicating that warming-enhanced snowfall is very unlikely to compensate for ocean-driven losses.</p>
<p>For risk-averse planners responsible for long-lived infrastructure, the team also characterised a physically plausible high-end pathway consistent with satellite observations. This posterior high-end scenario, defined as the top 1 per cent of calibrated 2100 projections under SSP5-8.5, unfolds as a cascade: a highly sensitive ocean warming response coincides with a sensitive melt parameterization, converting warming into vigorous basal melt; paired with a strongly plastic sliding law that lowers basal resistance, ice discharge accelerates, particularly under higher-order stress-balance formulations; and subgrid-scale melt and ice-shelf collapse then reduce buttressing, enabling rapid grounding-line retreat and potentially triggering marine ice-sheet instability. Together these mechanisms yield a median of 15.7 centimetres of sea-level rise by 2100, with a 95th-percentile value of 25.4 centimetres, and a probability of at least 0.99 that higher emissions produce higher sea-level rise than the lowest scenario.</p>
<p>The authors emphasise that several processes remain largely unexplored within ISMIP6, including marine ice cliff instability, coupled ice-ocean-atmosphere interactions, high-resolution surface mass balance, ice damage mechanisms and subglacial hydrology, any of which could accelerate mass loss once incorporated into future experiments. Their framework, they argue, offers a template for transparent documentation of ice-model features and a route to integrating new process representations coherently. The bottom line for coastal communities is sobering but actionable: Antarctic mass loss this century is effectively locked in, higher emissions directly amplify near-term risk with a probability of at least 0.89, and managing that risk demands both rapid emissions reductions in line with the Paris Agreement and sharper constraints on the modelling choices, climate model selection, sliding laws and ice-shelf melt parameterizations, that drive the deepest uncertainties in sea-level projections.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Committed twenty-first-century mass loss of the Antarctic Ice Sheet and its contribution to sea-level rise</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Committed Antarctic Ice Sheet mass loss by the end of the twenty-first century</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Lin, Y., Zhang, X., Golledge, N. R., Kopp, R. E., Church, J. A., Jin, Y., Zhao, C., &amp; Stokes, C. R. (2026). Committed Antarctic Ice Sheet mass loss by the end of the twenty-first century. <em>Nature Geoscience</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02102-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02102-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02102-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41561-026-02102-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Antarctic Ice Sheet, sea-level rise, ice-sheet modelling, ISMIP6, machine learning, Bayesian calibration, emissions scenarios, ice-shelf melt, sliding laws, marine ice-sheet instability, climate projections, coastal risk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">247454</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>East Antarctica&#8217;s Sleeping Giant: The Wilkes Basin Ice Sheet May Be Far Less Stable Than Assumed</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/east-antarcticas-sleeping-giant-the-wilkes-basin-ice-sheet-may-be-far-less-stable-than-assumed/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 19:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic bathymetry and climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic Bottom Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic ice sheet geological evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic ice sheet modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circumpolar deep water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Antarctic Ice Sheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Antarctica ice sheet stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glaciology and ice sheet dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global sea level projections from Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grounding line retreat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grounding line retreat mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice sheet self-reinforcing retreat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice shelves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ice-sheet modelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine ice-sheet instability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine-based ice sheet vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palaeoclimate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pliocene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential sea level rise from East Antarctica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retrograde bed slope ice instability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea level rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subglacial hydrology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilkes Subglacial Basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wilkes Subglacial Basin sea level rise]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=218686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A major new review finds that the Wilkes Subglacial Basin in East Antarctica, holding enough ice to raise global sea level by three to four metres, is geometrically vulnerable to unstable retreat that past warm periods and present-day observations suggest may already be beginning.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buried beneath kilometres of ice in East Antarctica lies a topographic depression so vast, and so precariously configured, that scientists have long suspected it could become the next great wildcard in global sea-level projections. A comprehensive new review published in Nature Reviews Earth &amp; Environment now pulls together decades of geological, oceanographic, geophysical and modelling evidence to assess just how vulnerable that region really is. Its conclusion is sobering: the Wilkes Subglacial Basin, a marine-based sector of the East Antarctic Ice Sheet, holds enough ice to raise global mean sea level by three to four metres, and its geometry makes it inherently susceptible to unstable, self-reinforcing retreat once warming pushes it past critical thresholds.</p>
<p>The basin&#8217;s vulnerability stems from its bathymetry. Much of the bedrock beneath the Wilkes Subglacial Basin sits below sea level and deepens inland, a configuration known as a retrograde bed slope. That geometry is the essential ingredient for what glaciologists call marine ice-sheet instability. When the grounding line, the boundary where grounded ice begins to float, retreats onto such a slope, the ice at the grounding line becomes progressively thicker, increasing the outward flux of ice and driving further retreat. The result is a positive feedback that can continue even if the climate forcing that triggered it stabilises. Classic theoretical work on grounding-line dynamics, notably the stability analysis published by Christian Schoof in 2007, formalised this behaviour, and the Wilkes Subglacial Basin is now recognised as one of the largest marine-grounded basins in East Antarctica where the feedback could operate at scale.</p>
<p>The review&#8217;s synthesis of palaeoclimate evidence is perhaps its most striking element. Marine sediment cores recovered from the continental shelf offshore Wilkes Land, together with ice-sheet model simulations, indicate that substantial retreat of the basin&#8217;s ice occurred during past warm periods, most notably during the Pliocene epoch roughly three to five million years ago, when atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations were comparable to today&#8217;s. Geochemical proxies in deep-sea sediments record deglacial events with clear biogeochemical responses downstream of the basin, and iceberg-rafted debris in Southern Ocean sediments testifies to episodes of enhanced ice discharge. Model reconstructions of specific Pleistocene interglacials, including Marine Isotope Stages 31, 11 and 5e, suggest repeated episodes of ice loss from the basin, although the review is careful to note that the precise temperature thresholds at which such retreat was triggered remain uncertain.</p>
<p>That uncertainty matters because it bears directly on the question of commitment. If the basin retreated substantially during interglacials only modestly warmer than the pre-industrial climate, then the margin of safety under current warming trajectories may be thin. Recent analyses of Pliocene sea level, drawing on geographically diverse geological archives, imply global mean sea levels several metres above present during that epoch, and the Wilkes Subglacial Basin is one of the few sectors of East Antarctica with sufficient ice volume to account for a meaningful share of that rise. The review&#8217;s authors, an international team led by Matt King of the University of Tasmania and including specialists spanning glaciology, oceanography, geophysics and palaeoceanography, argue that reconciling sedimentary archives with model simulations is essential to pin down how much warming the basin can absorb before retreat becomes self-sustaining.</p>
<p>Observations of the present-day ice sheet add a further layer of concern. Satellite altimetry, gravimetry and interferometric synthetic aperture radar measurements reveal multidecadal retreat of the grounding line in parts of the Wilkes Land sector, along with thinning and, in places, collapse of key fringing ice shelves. The Cook Ice Shelf and the Ninnis and Mertz glacier systems, which drain large portions of the basin, have shown measurable change, including velocity increases at Cook Glacier linked to ice-shelf loss and a documented subglacial flood event. Intriguingly, the review highlights that this retreat has not yet been accompanied by clear upstream surface lowering across the basin interior, leaving the ultimate cause of the observed changes unattributed. Whether the signal reflects ocean-driven melt at the ice front, atmospheric variability, or internal ice-sheet dynamics remains an open and pressing question.</p>
<p>The oceanographic context is shifting in ways that favour further change. Relatively warm, salty circumpolar deep water, which can melt ice shelves from below, has been shifting poleward in the Australian-Antarctic sector, increasing the risk of warm-water intrusions onto the continental shelf through the deep glacial troughs that dissect the Wilkes Land margin. At the same time, meltwater from Antarctic ice shelves is freshening the surface ocean, suppressing the formation of dense Antarctic bottom water that drives global deep-ocean circulation. Recent studies have documented reduced abyssal overturning and ventilation in the Australian-Antarctic Basin, and modelling suggests that sustained Antarctic meltwater release could slow the abyssal ocean&#8217;s overturning circulation within decades. A major retreat of the Wilkes Subglacial Basin would amplify this meltwater flux, with consequences that ripple through ocean circulation, carbon cycling and marine ecosystems far beyond the Southern Ocean.</p>
<p>Projections of the basin&#8217;s future under different emissions scenarios reveal the potential speed of change. Ice-sheet model simulations indicate that, once the grounding line retreats beyond key bedrock pinning points, retreat rates of up to roughly one kilometre per year are possible, an extraordinary pace for a continental ice sheet. The timing of such events is deeply uncertain, but the review stresses a more troubling point: decisions taken this century, in effect the emissions pathway the world follows over the coming decades, may commit the basin to multimillennial change. Because the retreat feedback operates on timescales far longer than human political and economic planning horizons, the full sea-level consequences of near-term warming would unfold over centuries to millennia, locking in losses that later mitigation cannot reverse. Sea-level feedbacks, including the gravitational and solid-Earth responses to changing ice load, modulate but do not eliminate this risk.</p>
<p>The review also identifies the processes that remain poorly constrained and that dominate projection uncertainty. Subglacial hydrology is one: the basin sits atop thick sedimentary sequences, and groundwater systems beneath the ice can amplify sliding and mass loss through basal water feedbacks. Geothermal heat flux, which softens the ice base and feeds subglacial lakes and drainage networks, is poorly mapped across the region. The stability of fringing ice shelves, which buttress upstream flow, depends on basal melt rates, calving dynamics and the protective role of land-fast sea ice, all of which are changing. Surface melt and meltwater ponding, historically rare in East Antarctica, are becoming more sensitive to atmospheric warming, raising the possibility of hydrofracturing-driven ice-shelf disintegration analogous to events observed on the Antarctic Peninsula. Improving the representation of these processes in ice-sheet models, and grounding them in field observations, is central to narrowing the spread of sea-level projections.</p>
<p>The authors&#8217; prescription is unambiguous: a coordinated, multinational and multiyear programme of fieldwork and modelling focused specifically on the Wilkes Subglacial Basin. Such a programme would combine airborne geophysics to refine bed topography and subglacial geology, seismic surveys to characterise sediment properties and mantle structure, oceanographic moorings to monitor warm-water intrusions onto the shelf, sediment coring to extend the palaeo-archive, and targeted ice-core records to constrain past ice extent. It would also feed directly into model intercomparison efforts such as ISMIP6 and its successors, which currently struggle to agree on the basin&#8217;s response to given levels of warming. The review notes that planning for such coordinated fieldwork is already under way through international scientific committees, but the scale of the challenge, in one of the most remote and logistically demanding environments on Earth, demands sustained investment across multiple national Antarctic programmes.</p>
<p>What emerges from the synthesis is a picture of an ice sheet sector that is neither doomed imminently nor safely stable, but poised in a state whose trajectory depends on choices made now. The Wilkes Subglacial Basin has retreated before under natural warmth, its fringing ice is already showing signs of stress, and the ocean around it is warming and freshening in ways that erode its natural defences. With three to four metres of potential sea-level rise at stake, alongside far-reaching consequences for ocean circulation and Southern Ocean ecosystems, the basin has moved from a scientific curiosity to a first-order question for climate policy. The review&#8217;s central message is that the window for reducing uncertainty through observation is open, but narrowing, and that understanding this sleeping giant of East Antarctica is no longer optional.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Climate vulnerability and dynamic instability of the marine-based Wilkes Subglacial Basin Ice Sheet in East Antarctica</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Dynamic instability of the Wilkes Subglacial Basin Ice Sheet, East Antarctica</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> King, M. A., Bertler, N. A. N., Anandakrishnan, S., Barruol, G., Bentley, M. J., Crosta, X., Christoffersen, P., Colleoni, F., De Santis, L., Escutia, C., Etourneau, J., Evangelinos, D., Ferraccioli, F., Golledge, N. R., Harris, M., Heil, P., Hill, N. A., Hodgson-Johnston, I., Hofstede, C., &#8230; Zhao, C. (2026). Dynamic instability of the Wilkes Subglacial Basin Ice Sheet, East Antarctica. <em>Nature Reviews Earth &amp;amp; Environment</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-026-00827-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-026-00827-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-026-00827-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s43017-026-00827-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Wilkes Subglacial Basin, East Antarctic Ice Sheet, marine ice-sheet instability, sea-level rise, grounding line retreat, ice shelves, circumpolar deep water, Pliocene, palaeoclimate, ice-sheet modelling, Antarctic bottom water, subglacial hydrology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">218686</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
