<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>marine ecosystem health concerns &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/marine-ecosystem-health-concerns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 08:18:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Microplastics Found in Meretrix aurora from Southeast India</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/microplastics-found-in-meretrix-aurora-from-southeast-india/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 08:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological implications of microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filter feeders and microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human health risks from microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of microplastics on marine life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine ecosystem health concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meretrix aurora contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastic effects on seafood safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics in marine bivalves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punnakayal Estuary research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sources of microplastic pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southeast India marine pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuticorin Coast environmental study]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/microplastics-found-in-meretrix-aurora-from-southeast-india/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Microplastics have emerged as a significant environmental crisis, gaining attention from researchers, policymakers, and the public alike. In a groundbreaking study highlighting this pressing issue, S. S. and J. Patterson have meticulously assessed microplastic contamination in the marine bivalve, Meretrix aurora, found in the Punnakayal Estuary and along the Tuticorin Coast in Southeast India. Their [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microplastics have emerged as a significant environmental crisis, gaining attention from researchers, policymakers, and the public alike. In a groundbreaking study highlighting this pressing issue, S. S. and J. Patterson have meticulously assessed microplastic contamination in the marine bivalve, Meretrix aurora, found in the Punnakayal Estuary and along the Tuticorin Coast in Southeast India. Their research provides insight into the extent of microplastic pollution in these vital ecosystems, shedding light on the possible implications for marine life and human health.</p>
<p>The study reports an alarming concentration of microplastics in the tissues of Meretrix aurora, indicating the widespread prevalence of these tiny plastic particles in the marine environment. Being filter feeders, these bivalves accumulate microplastics in their bodies, posing potential health risks not only to the organisms themselves but also to the predators that consume them. The implications of such contamination are dire, raising questions about the safety of seafood for human consumption, particularly in regions reliant on marine resources for their livelihoods.</p>
<p>Researchers have noted that microplastics can originate from various sources, including the degradation of larger plastic debris, textiles, and industrial waste. Once released into the marine environment, these particles can be ingested by marine organisms, where they may disrupt physiological processes and bioaccumulate in the food chain. The studies conducted by S. S. and Patterson present formidable evidence of microplastic ingestion by marine life, with their findings highlighting the need for urgent action to mitigate plastic pollution.</p>
<p>The investigation involved extensive sampling in both the Punnakayal Estuary and the Tuticorin Coast, utilizing sophisticated methods to quantify and characterize the microplastics found in the bivalve tissues. The researchers employed a combination of physical separation techniques and spectroscopic analysis, ensuring the reliability of their results. This rigorous approach underscores the importance of adopting advanced methodologies when examining contaminants in biological samples, fostering a deeper understanding of the environmental crisis at hand.</p>
<p>Moreover, the findings reveal a concerning correlation between microplastic concentration and environmental factors such as urbanization and industrial activity in the vicinity. Areas experiencing heightened anthropogenic pressure exhibited significantly higher levels of microplastic contamination, further illuminating the role of human actions in exacerbating this global issue. This underscores the crucial need for sustainable practices and heightened public awareness regarding waste management and pollution.</p>
<p>As the study progresses, researchers emphasize the interplay between microplastics and various environmental parameters, such as temperature and salinity, which can influence the behavior and persistence of these pollutants in marine environments. Understanding these interactions is essential for developing effective strategies to combat microplastic pollution and minimize its impact on marine ecosystems and human health.</p>
<p>The alarming results of this research call for immediate attention from the scientific community, policymakers, and the general public to address the rampant issue of plastic pollution. Action plans that promote cleaner production practices, enhanced recycling programs, and public education initiatives could significantly reduce plastic waste entering marine environments. By fostering a culture of sustainability, society can help mitigate the pervasive threat posed by microplastics.</p>
<p>To combat this crisis, international collaboration is essential. Countries must work together to establish stringent regulations on plastic production and waste management while promoting research initiatives focused on understanding the impact of microplastics. It is imperative to support legislation mandating the reduction of single-use plastics and incentivizing innovation in alternative materials to lessen dependency on conventional plastics.</p>
<p>Public engagement plays a vital role in addressing microplastic contamination. Individuals can contribute by participating in beach cleanups, supporting sustainable brands, and advocating for policies that aim to reduce plastic waste. By raising awareness of the issue, communities can take collective action, leading to broader societal changes that drive a reduction in plastic pollution.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the research conducted by S. S. and Patterson serves as a vital contribution to the ongoing discourse on microplastic pollution and its implications for marine ecosystems and human health. Their findings call for a comprehensive approach to understanding and addressing the multifaceted challenges posed by microplastics. As society grapples with the consequences of plastic pollution, it is crucial to foster an environment that prioritizes sustainability and responsible consumption, ensuring a healthier planet for future generations.</p>
<p>As the world continues to grapple with the growing plastic crisis, the insights provided by this research are essential for shaping effective strategies to combat microplastic pollution and its detrimental effects on marine life and food security. This critical study highlights the urgent need for a collaborative effort to safeguard the oceans and the organisms that inhabit them from the ever-growing threat of microplastics.</p>
<p>By engaging in meaningful dialogue about the issues raised in this study, stakeholders across various sectors can foster a more sustainable future, demonstrating that collective action can lead to tangible improvements in preserving marine biodiversity and public health in light of alarming environmental challenges posed by plastic pollution.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Microplastic contamination in marine bivalves</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Assessment of microplastic contamination in Meretrix aurora from Punnakayal Estuary and Tuticorin Coast, Southeast India.</p>
<p><strong>Article References</strong>:<br />
S, S., Patterson, J. Assessment of microplastic contamination in <i>Meretrix aurora</i> from Punnakayal Estuary and Tuticorin Coast, Southeast India. <i>Environ Monit Assess</i> <b>197</b>, 1374 (2025). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14820-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14820-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI</strong>: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14820-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14820-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Microplastics, Meretrix aurora, marine pollution, environmental impact, bivalves, Punnakayal Estuary, Tuticorin Coast, Southeast India.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">111142</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polypropylene Leachates Harm Marine Diatoms, Unlike PLA</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/polypropylene-leachates-harm-marine-diatoms-unlike-pla/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 19:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodegradable plastics comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical interactions of plastic leachates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diatoms role in ocean ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological implications of plastic design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental regulations for plastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leachates from weathered plastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine diatoms ecotoxicology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine ecosystem health concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLA vs PP environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic waste and marine life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polypropylene plastic pollution effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable alternatives to polypropylene]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/polypropylene-leachates-harm-marine-diatoms-unlike-pla/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In an era dominated by escalating environmental concerns, a landmark study has emerged shedding light on the nuanced impacts of plastic pollution on marine ecosystems. Researchers have unveiled compelling evidence indicating that leachates from weathered polypropylene (PP) items, a common plastic polymer, exert significant ecotoxicological effects on a widely studied marine diatom species. Interestingly, similar [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an era dominated by escalating environmental concerns, a landmark study has emerged shedding light on the nuanced impacts of plastic pollution on marine ecosystems. Researchers have unveiled compelling evidence indicating that leachates from weathered polypropylene (PP) items, a common plastic polymer, exert significant ecotoxicological effects on a widely studied marine diatom species. Interestingly, similar leachates originating from polylactic acid (PLA), a bio-based and biodegradable alternative, did not elicit comparable toxic responses. This discovery harbors profound implications for the future design and regulation of plastics in marine environments.</p>
<p>Polypropylene is one of the most prevalently used plastics across industries, renowned for its durability, versatility, and low cost. However, its persistence in natural environments, especially marine ecosystems, underpins grave ecological concerns. When PP debris undergoes weathering through exposure to UV radiation, mechanical abrasion, and chemical interactions, it releases complex cocktails of chemical compounds—leachates—that can interact with marine life in potentially harmful ways. Until now, the mechanisms and extent of toxicity induced by these leachates remained poorly characterized.</p>
<p>This study dives deeply into the ecotoxicological dimension by focusing on a key marine primary producer: the diatom. Diatoms are microscopic algae that contribute substantially to oceanic photosynthesis and serve as foundational nodes in aquatic food webs. Disruptions to their growth or function can cascade through marine ecosystems, eliciting broad biodiversity and productivity consequences. The research team subjected marine diatom cultures to aqueous extracts derived from artificially weathered PP and PLA samples, mimicking environmental leachates, and evaluated a suite of physiological and biochemical endpoints.</p>
<p>The results indicated stark contrasts between the two polymer types. Leachates from weathered polypropylene impaired diatom photosynthetic efficiency, growth rates, and cellular integrity in a dose-dependent manner. Biochemical analyses revealed elevated oxidative stress markers and disruptions in membrane stability, signaling profound subcellular damage. In contrast, leachates from weathered polylactic acid showed negligible effects, underscoring its relative environmental benignity under the tested conditions.</p>
<p>Beyond physiological markers, metabolomic profiling detected diverse organic compounds leached specifically from PP particles, including additives, oligomers, and oxidative degradation products—many of which have known toxic potentials. Such complex chemical mixtures likely act synergistically to drive the observed diatom toxicity. These findings underscore the urgent need to consider the entire lifecycle and environmental degradation pathways of widely used plastics rather than solely focusing on bulk polymer presence.</p>
<p>The implications of this research extend beyond academic interest. Marine diatoms influence global carbon cycling and oxygen production; thus, interference with their populations by plastic leachates could exacerbate climate change and threaten marine biodiversity. Regulatory frameworks currently emphasize plastic debris removal and recycling but rarely address the invisible chemical threats posed during plastic weathering. Emerging insights necessitate integrating chemical ecotoxicity assessments into environmental risk evaluations of plastic pollution.</p>
<p>Moreover, the apparent safety profile of polylactic acid in this context advocates for a potential pivot toward bioplastics in curbing marine pollution. Although PLA has limitations such as biodegradation conditions and feedstock sourcing challenges, its comparatively low leachate toxicity suggests viable pathways for minimizing ecological harm. Future research must rigorously evaluate degradation products of alternative polymers across diverse environmental matrices and timescales to validate this promise.</p>
<p>This study also shines light on the complex interactions between anthropogenic pollutants and microbial communities. Marine microorganisms play critical roles in nutrient cycling, pollutant degradation, and ecosystem resilience. Identifying substances that disrupt their functionality is key for predicting and mitigating human impacts on ocean health. The innovative analytical techniques employed here—including high-resolution mass spectrometry and advanced microscopy—offer powerful tools to unravel these interactions with unprecedented detail.</p>
<p>Importantly, these findings call for multidisciplinary collaborations that bridge polymer chemistry, ecotoxicology, marine biology, and environmental policy. Such integrative efforts can drive holistic solutions encompassing safer material design, robust pollution monitoring, and ecosystem-centered management strategies. Public awareness campaigns informed by scientific clarity can further galvanize collective action against plastic pollution’s multifaceted threats.</p>
<p>The research not only enriches our understanding of microplastic-associated risks but also challenges assumptions of biodegradability and environmental safety often attributed to emerging materials. It emphasizes the intricate pathways through which human-made substances can permeate and perturb natural systems, sometimes in subtle yet widespread manners. By exposing nuanced toxicological effects on primary producers, the study lays a crucial foundation for safeguarding marine ecosystem functions in the Anthropocene.</p>
<p>Looking forward, comprehensive long-term field investigations and ecosystem-scale modeling will be essential to quantify real-world exposure scenarios and cumulative impacts. Developing standardized protocols for evaluating leachate toxicity across polymer types will also enhance regulatory consistency and material innovation. Ultimately, harmonizing scientific insights with proactive environmental stewardship can chart pathways toward resilient oceans and sustainable resource use.</p>
<p>This timely study is poised to recast narratives around plastic pollution and biodegradability, urging a reevaluation of environmental risk assessments that factor in aging and weathering processes. It underscores how the legacy of synthetic polymers extends beyond visible fragmentation to chemical perturbations that ripple through marine life in unexpected ways. As human-generated materials continue to accumulate, nuanced, science-driven approaches remain indispensable in confronting oceanic pollution challenges.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the ecotoxicological effects of leachates from weathered polypropylene on marine diatoms represent a critical piece of the broader contamination puzzle. With polylactic acid emerging as a less harmful alternative under experimental conditions, this research provides actionable insights into material selection and pollution mitigation. Amid accelerating plastic accumulation and climate stresses, preserving the health of microscopic yet mighty marine organisms is a crucial priority for sustaining ocean ecosystems and the global biosphere.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Ecotoxicological effects of leachates from weathered polypropylene and polylactic acid on marine diatoms.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Leachates from weathered polypropylene items, but not from polylactic acid, induce ecotoxicological effects on a marine diatom.</p>
<p><strong>Article References</strong>:<br />
Niu, Z., Segura, S.A., Gall, M.L. et al. Leachates from weathered polypropylene items, but not from polylactic acid, induce ecotoxicological effects on a marine diatom. <em>Micropl.&amp; Nanopl.</em>, 5, 35 (2025). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-025-00143-8">https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-025-00143-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI</strong>: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-025-00143-8">https://doi.org/10.1186/s43591-025-00143-8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">110792</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legacy POPs in Seabirds: Procellariiformes vs. Suliformes</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/legacy-pops-in-seabirds-procellariiformes-vs-suliformes/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Porter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 11:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparative analysis of seabird orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental toxins and wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feeding behavior and toxin exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical pollution effects on wildlife]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legacy persistent organic pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine ecosystem health concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procellariiformes ecological impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research on marine pollutants and avifauna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seabird bioaccumulation studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seabird conservation efforts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Atlantic seabird populations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suliformes pollution susceptibility]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/legacy-pops-in-seabirds-procellariiformes-vs-suliformes/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Recent scientific inquiries have unveiled alarming insights into the bioaccumulation of legacy persistent organic pollutants (POPs) within seabird populations, particularly distinguishing between the Procellariiformes and Suliformes orders inhabiting the South Atlantic. These findings not only spotlight the ecological implications of historical pollution but also raise pressing concerns regarding the health of marine ecosystems and their [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent scientific inquiries have unveiled alarming insights into the bioaccumulation of legacy persistent organic pollutants (POPs) within seabird populations, particularly distinguishing between the Procellariiformes and Suliformes orders inhabiting the South Atlantic. These findings not only spotlight the ecological implications of historical pollution but also raise pressing concerns regarding the health of marine ecosystems and their avian inhabitants. The intricate interplay of environmental toxins and wildlife presents a unique challenge that underscores the urgent need for continued research and conservation efforts.</p>
<p>The study led by de Assis Guilherme Padilha and colleagues offers a comprehensive overview of the bioaccumulation mechanisms affecting seabirds. The research systematically compares the impacts on two distinct groups of seabirds, highlighting the differential susceptibility to pollutants inherent in their feeding behaviors and ecological niches. By examining various species within the Procellariiformes and Suliformes families, the researchers provide a nuanced understanding of how these birds are affected by contaminants.</p>
<p>Procellariiformes, commonly known as tube-nosed seabirds, have a unique foraging strategy that may predispose them to higher pollutant intake. Their reliance on marine environments for food, especially in regions exposed to agricultural runoff and industrial waste, exposes them to a plethora of toxins that accumulate over time. The study meticulously traces the pathways through which these birds acquire harmful substances, shedding light on the complex dynamics between diet and pollution.</p>
<p>Conversely, the Suliformes, which include species like cormorants and gannets, demonstrate different feeding habits and habitat preferences that may influence their exposure to POPs. Analyzing the contrasting bioaccumulation patterns between these two avian groups illuminates critical insights into how ecological factors shape the fate of these pollutants. The study contemplates whether lifestyle choices inherent to each group may lead to varying health outcomes related to POP exposure.</p>
<p>The implications of these findings extend beyond the realm of avian health. The presence of legacy POPs in seabirds acts as an indicator of broader ecological health within marine ecosystems. These pollutants, which are notorious for their stubbornness in the environment, can travel through food webs, affecting not only seabirds but also entire marine populations, including fish and other marine mammals. As such, the bioaccumulation observed in these birds raises alarm bells regarding the integrity of marine biodiversity and the functioning of oceanic ecosystems.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the research highlights the potential repercussions for human health, given the interconnectedness of aquatic food chains. The consumption of contaminated seafood by humans can lead to an unintended transfer of harmful pollutants. As seabirds are often viewed as sentinel species, their health reflects underlying environmental conditions, emphasizing the need for heightened awareness and preemptive action against marine pollution.</p>
<p>In presenting these research findings, the authors advocate for immediate and robust policy measures aimed at mitigating the release of legacy contaminants into the marine environment. They underscore the importance of international cooperation in addressing the persistent issue of POPs, which despite their ban in many countries, continue to circulate in ecosystems due to their long survival in the environment. Enhanced regulation and stringent monitoring of pollutant levels in marine settings are crucial steps in safeguarding not only wildlife but also public health.</p>
<p>Addressing the knowledge gaps surrounding the toxicity of various POPs, the study encourages further exploration into specific compounds and their effects on seabird physiology and behavior. This level of detail is critical for constructing informed conservation strategies that prioritize vulnerable species and ecosystems. Understanding the long-term impacts of chronic exposure to these pollutants is essential for developing effective management frameworks to monitor and rehabilitate affected populations.</p>
<p>The research also emphasizes the necessity of interdisciplinary approaches to tackling marine pollution. Collaboration among ecologists, toxicologists, and conservationists can yield innovative solutions, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges presented by POPs. Such collaborations can facilitate the development of targeted interventions that enhance the resilience of seabird populations and the ecosystems on which they depend.</p>
<p>The findings prompt a broader reflection on our collective responsibility towards environmental stewardship. As stewards of the planet, mankind bears the moral obligation to rectify the mistakes of the past, particularly regarding the release of harmful substances into the environment. The lessons learned from this research serve as a clarion call for improved practices in waste management and environmental protection to ensure the longevity of marine species and the health of our oceans.</p>
<p>Strategies for public engagement and education around the impacts of POPs are also essential. Increasing awareness of pollution’s effects on seabirds can galvanize community action and support for conservation initiatives. Engaging the public in citizen science projects related to marine conservation can foster a sense of shared responsibility and connection to the environment, ultimately promoting an ethos of sustainability.</p>
<p>In summary, the research encapsulated by de Assis Guilherme Padilha and colleagues stands as a crucial reminder of the ongoing challenges posed by legacy pollutants and their bioaccumulation in marine birds. The detrimental effects of these substances on the Procellariiformes and Suliformes orders illuminate the need for continuous study, direct action, and communal involvement in environmental preservation. As we move forward, it is imperative to leverage this knowledge to forge a sustainable path for our oceans and the countless species that inhabit them.</p>
<p>The alarming revelations about the degree to which seabirds are affected by legacy pollutants challenge researchers and conservationists alike to innovate and adapt their strategies. As our understanding of these complex ecological interactions deepens, the hope is that future initiatives will lead to significant reductions in pollutant levels, allowing seabird populations to thrive once more in a cleaner, healthier marine environment. Ultimately, this study serves not only as an academic pursuit but as a vital call to action, emphasizing that the choices we make today significantly shape the ecological landscape of tomorrow.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Bioaccumulation of legacy persistent organic pollutants in seabirds</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Bioaccumulation of legacy POPs in seabirds: A multi-species comparison between Procellariiformes and Suliformes in the South Atlantic</p>
<p><strong>Article References</strong>:</p>
<p class="c-bibliographic-information__citation">de Assis Guilherme Padilha, J., Taniguchi, S., Petry, M. <i>et al.</i> Bioaccumulation of legacy POPs in seabirds: A multi-species comparison between Procellariiformes and Suliformes in the South Atlantic.<br />
                    <i>Environ Monit Assess</i> <b>197</b>, 1311 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14703-1</p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI</strong>: <span class="c-bibliographic-information__value">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-025-14703-1</span></p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Bioaccumulation, Seabirds, Persistent Organic Pollutants, Procellariiformes, Suliformes, Marine Ecosystems, Environmental Health.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">102909</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
