<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>machine learning in transportation &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/machine-learning-in-transportation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 13:58:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Machine and Deep Learning Advance Traffic Congestion Forecasting in Intelligent Transportation Systems</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/machine-and-deep-learning-advance-traffic-congestion-forecasting-in-intelligent-transportation-systems/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake Davidson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 13:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptive traffic signal control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city-wide traffic congestion prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning for traffic forecasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disruption detection in traffic systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligent transportation systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning in transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[predictive modeling for traffic flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time traffic management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensor and GPS data in traffic prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic congestion prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation data sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vehicle data analysis]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/machine-and-deep-learning-advance-traffic-congestion-forecasting-in-intelligent-transportation-systems/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Traffic congestion may soon become less a problem of reacting to stalled roads and more a problem of seeing the jam before it forms. A new review published in the International Journal of Data Science and Analytics examines how machine learning and deep learning are reshaping traffic-flow forecasting, bringing together evidence from models that analyse [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traffic congestion may soon become less a problem of reacting to stalled roads and more a problem of seeing the jam before it forms. A new review published in the <em>International Journal of Data Science and Analytics</em> examines how machine learning and deep learning are reshaping traffic-flow forecasting, bringing together evidence from models that analyse vehicle counts, speed, occupancy, road-network structure, weather, incidents, social-media activity and other sources of transport data. The review argues that the most promising systems are moving beyond simple predictions based on historical averages. Instead, they are learning how traffic changes across time and space, how neighbouring roads influence one another, and how sudden disruptions can transform an ordinary commute into a city-wide bottleneck.</p>
<p>The study, conducted by researchers from the University of the Free State and the University of KwaZulu-Natal in South Africa, focuses on the growing role of intelligent transportation systems. These systems use connected sensors, cameras, GPS devices, mobile networks and computational models to observe and manage transport conditions. Accurate forecasting is essential because it allows traffic authorities to adjust signal timings, issue warnings, redirect vehicles and plan interventions before congestion reaches its worst stage. It can also help drivers choose better routes and reduce fuel consumption, travel delays and emissions. At the heart of this transformation is machine learning, in which algorithms identify patterns in data and use them to make predictions without being explicitly programmed for every possible traffic situation.</p>
<p>Traditional machine-learning methods remain useful, particularly when datasets are relatively small or when traffic conditions can be described by a limited number of features. The review discusses techniques including K-means clustering, K-nearest neighbours, support vector machines, Naïve Bayes, logistic regression, random forests and artificial neural networks. K-means can divide historical traffic records into groups representing recurring patterns, such as weekday rush hours, weekends or unusual disruptions. A forecasting model can then select the pattern most similar to current conditions. K-nearest neighbours makes predictions by comparing a new traffic situation with previously observed situations, while support vector regression maps complex relationships between traffic variables and future flow. These methods can be comparatively fast and easier to interpret, but they often struggle when traffic behaviour becomes highly nonlinear, geographically interconnected or unpredictable over long periods.</p>
<p>Deep-learning models approach the problem differently by using multilayer neural networks capable of learning complex representations from large quantities of data. Convolutional neural networks, or CNNs, are particularly effective at detecting local spatial patterns. In traffic applications, a road network can be represented as a grid or as structured relationships among intersections, allowing a CNN to identify congestion patterns spreading across nearby locations. Recurrent neural networks, or RNNs, are designed for sequential data and retain information from earlier time steps. Their descendants, long short-term memory networks, or LSTMs, use input, forget and output gates to decide which information should be stored, discarded or passed forward. This architecture helps the model retain important long-term traffic trends while reducing the loss of information that can affect conventional RNNs.</p>
<p>The review highlights a rapid expansion of hybrid architectures that combine the strengths of several deep-learning systems. CNN–LSTM models use convolutional layers to extract spatial features and recurrent layers to model temporal changes, making them suitable for city-wide forecasting. Other systems use gated recurrent units, attention mechanisms and graph convolutional networks. Graph-based models represent roads and intersections as nodes connected by edges, allowing the model to learn how traffic conditions at one location affect others. Attention mechanisms assign greater weight to the most relevant parts of the traffic history or network. The gated recurrent graph convolutional attention network, known as GRGCAN, is one example of this approach. On public PeMSD4 and PeMSD8 datasets, the review reports that GRGCAN achieved mean absolute percentage errors of 15.97 and 12.13 percent for one-hour forecasting, while also outperforming several baseline methods in accuracy and computational efficiency.</p>
<p>Several studies reviewed in the paper demonstrate how specialised designs can improve prediction under particular conditions. A K-means-LSTM system first groups daily traffic profiles and then uses an LSTM to forecast the next traffic value, reducing the influence of abnormal observations. Another K-means-GRU model combines clustering with nearest-neighbour classification to identify the historical pattern most similar to the target day. A time-slot recurrent neural network separates historical data into groups based on recurring time intervals, removing less relevant records and making online prediction more efficient. Transformer-based systems, including CNNformer, use attention to identify important temporal relationships while CNN layers extract spatial information from multiple intersections. These models reflect a broader shift toward architectures that can process traffic as a dynamic network rather than as isolated measurements from individual roads.</p>
<p>One of the most important conclusions is that external information can make forecasts more realistic. Traffic is not controlled only by the number of vehicles recorded a few minutes earlier. Rain, temperature, visibility, roadworks, crashes, public events, holidays, land-use changes and major disruptions can all alter travel behaviour. A spatial-temporal fusion graph convolutional network that incorporated weather variables improved prediction accuracy for 15-, 30- and 60-minute horizons, with reported gains of 3.94, 3.54 and 4.09 percent. Other work has extracted traffic conditions from online videos, combined vehicle movements with meteorological measurements, and used social-media activity to anticipate next-morning traffic. However, the review finds that the integration of such contextual information remains inconsistent. Many models still rely almost entirely on historical traffic records, limiting their ability to respond to rare or rapidly developing events.</p>
<p>Data quality is another major obstacle. Modern forecasting systems may consume millions of records from road sensors, cameras, GPS probes, mobile devices and social platforms, but these sources are frequently incomplete, noisy or unevenly distributed. Sensors can fail, cameras can be obstructed, probe vehicles may be concentrated on major routes, and social-media activity can vary dramatically between communities. High-resolution trajectory datasets can reveal detailed driving behaviour but often cover only a small area. Large sensor networks provide extensive time-series data but may contain missing values and measurement errors. The review describes hybrid methods that use clustering, attention-optimised LSTMs and AdaBoost to reconstruct missing traffic-flow data. Although these methods can substantially improve imputation accuracy, their computational complexity may prevent rapid deployment, particularly in regions with limited hardware and connectivity.</p>
<p>The gap between laboratory performance and real-world operation is a central concern. Deep models often produce impressive results on a specific dataset, yet their accuracy may decline when they are transferred to another city with different road layouts, driving cultures, weather patterns and transport policies. More complex models also demand substantial computing power, while their internal decision-making can be difficult for traffic engineers and the public to interpret. A system that predicts severe congestion should ideally explain whether the forecast was driven by a growing queue, a weather event, an incident or a pattern learned from similar days. The researchers also note that many studies concentrate on freeways and signalised intersections, leaving unsignalised intersections comparatively neglected. These locations involve right-of-way decisions, variable driver behaviour and irregular vehicle interactions, making them especially challenging but highly relevant to rapidly expanding urban areas.</p>
<p>The review ultimately points toward adaptive, multimodal and locally informed traffic-intelligence systems. Future models will need to combine historical and real-time observations with weather reports, incident feeds, public-event schedules, land-use information, public-transport movements and perhaps connected-vehicle data. They will also need to learn continuously as traffic patterns change, while remaining efficient enough to operate at the roadside or on edge-computing devices. For South Africa, the authors identify a particular need for models designed around non-signalised intersections in Gauteng and Johannesburg, where congestion, safety risks and data limitations intersect. The broader message is that no single algorithm will solve urban traffic. The most effective forecasting systems will be those that balance accuracy with speed, explainability, resilience and transferability. By predicting congestion before it becomes visible to most drivers, intelligent transportation networks could turn traffic management from a reactive emergency response into a proactive, data-driven service.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Machine learning and deep learning techniques for traffic congestion and traffic-flow forecasting in intelligent transportation systems.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Advances in intelligent transportation systems: ML and DL techniques for traffic congestion forecasting</p>
<p><strong>Article References</strong>: Matue, T., Akinyelu, A. A., &amp; Mokotsolane, M. “Advances in intelligent transportation systems: ML and DL techniques for traffic congestion forecasting.” <em>International Journal of Data Science and Analytics</em>, 22, Article 285 (2026).</p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI</strong>: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-026-01203-9">https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-026-01203-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Intelligent transportation systems; machine learning; deep learning; traffic congestion forecasting; traffic flow prediction; CNN; LSTM; RNN; graph neural networks; spatiotemporal modelling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">182258</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enhancing Urban Planning: Melbourne&#8217;s Bus Network Connectivity</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/enhancing-urban-planning-melbournes-bus-network-connectivity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courtney Benton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2025 03:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commuter travel patterns in cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data-driven urban transit solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficient bus scheduling systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhancing public transportation connectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning in transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melbourne bus network optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public transit accessibility improvements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public transportation infrastructure analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time data in transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing urban congestion through transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart technology in public transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban planning strategies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/enhancing-urban-planning-melbournes-bus-network-connectivity/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In recent years, urban planning has evolved significantly with the integration of smart technology and data-driven approaches to enhance public transit systems. This transformation aims to address the increasing demands of urbanization, where millions of people are moving to cities, necessitating efficient transportation networks. A pivotal study conducted in Melbourne explores the dynamics of public [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, urban planning has evolved significantly with the integration of smart technology and data-driven approaches to enhance public transit systems. This transformation aims to address the increasing demands of urbanization, where millions of people are moving to cities, necessitating efficient transportation networks. A pivotal study conducted in Melbourne explores the dynamics of public transit connectivity, particularly focusing on the effectiveness of the city&#8217;s bus network as a case study.</p>
<p>The research sheds light on how transportation systems can be optimized to improve accessibility and reduce congestion. In a city like Melbourne, known for its sprawling suburbs and vibrant urban life, the complexities of bus networks become apparent. The connectivity between various public transit modes is crucial to ensure seamless travel for commuters who rely on these services for their daily activities. The study investigates the existing infrastructure, highlighting both its strengths and the areas that require enhancement.</p>
<p>One of the key findings of the research is that the integration of technology into bus scheduling and routing can significantly improve efficiency. By leveraging real-time data and machine learning algorithms, urban planners can create more responsive transit systems that cater to the needs of riders. Such systems can predict demand patterns and adjust services accordingly, ensuring that buses arrive when commuters need them the most. This kind of proactive planning can mitigate wait times and improve the overall user experience.</p>
<p>Moreover, the study emphasizes the importance of multi-modal transportation systems, where buses, trains, trams, and bicycles work in harmony. The effectiveness of the bus network is often evaluated based on its interconnectivity with other modes of transport. In Melbourne, enhancing these connections can lead to a more cohesive transportation ecosystem that encourages public transit usage over private vehicle reliance. The researchers advocate for policies that promote intermodal hubs, where passengers can easily switch from one transit mode to another.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the social equity aspect of public transit is a focal point of the study. Access to reliable transportation is not just a logistical issue; it is also a matter of social justice. The research reveals that certain neighborhoods suffer from inadequate bus services, leaving residents without vital access to employment, education, and healthcare. By conducting a thorough analysis of bus routes and service frequencies, policymakers can identify underserved areas and implement targeted improvements to rectify these disparities.</p>
<p>Another significant element explored in the study is the environmental impact of public transit systems. As cities strive to meet sustainability goals and reduce carbon emissions, enhancing the efficiency of bus networks can play a crucial role. Buses, particularly electric or hybrid models, have the potential to significantly lower the greenhouse gas emissions associated with urban travel. By promoting public transit as a viable alternative to personal vehicles, cities can foster an environmentally friendly transportation culture.</p>
<p>In addition to environmental considerations, the financial implications of a well-connected bus network are significant. Investment in public transit can yield substantial economic returns by facilitating access to jobs and services. The research indicates that for every dollar spent on improving public transportation, cities can expect increased economic activity and reduced road maintenance costs over time. This data underscores the notion that smart urban planning is an investment in a city’s future prosperity.</p>
<p>The study also delves deeply into the utilization of big data in transit planning. With the advent of advanced analytics, urban planners can derive insights from travel patterns and commuter behavior. By harnessing this information, cities can create more tailored transit solutions that enhance overall system performance. Predictive modeling and data analytics not only help in real-time decision-making but also support long-term strategic planning efforts.</p>
<p>Another critical aspect of the research is community engagement. Involving residents in the planning process can yield better outcomes as it ensures that transit solutions align with the needs and preferences of the community. The study advocates for participatory approaches that allow citizens to voice their concerns and suggestions regarding public transit services. Fostering a sense of ownership among the community can result in increased public transit usage and overall satisfaction with the system.</p>
<p>As cities continue to grow and evolve, the need for an innovative approach to urban planning becomes ever more apparent. The insights gained from Melbourne&#8217;s bus network case study offer a framework that other cities can adopt to enhance their transit systems. By focusing on connectivity, efficiency, equity, and sustainability, urban planners can create robust transportation networks that accommodate future growth while alleviating current challenges.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the integration of smart technologies and data analytics in public transit systems represents a significant advancement in urban planning. The research conducted by Tiralosi et al. demonstrates that effective public transit connectivity is not merely about infrastructure, but also encompasses social, economic, and environmental dimensions of urban life. As cities worldwide grapple with the implications of rapid urbanization, studies like these will be instrumental in guiding the development of smarter, more sustainable urban transport solutions.</p>
<p>By prioritizing research-backed strategies and engaging the community in the planning process, cities can pave the way for a future where public transit is an efficient, equitable, and environmentally-friendly choice for all residents. The evolution of Melbourne&#8217;s bus network serves as a compelling model for other urban areas seeking to advance their own transportation systems in an age marked by rapid change and innovation.</p>
<p>Through collaborative efforts between researchers, urban planners, and local communities, the potential for improving public transit connectivity and creating smarter cities is within reach. The findings and recommendations from the Melbourne case study provide actionable insights that can guide similar initiatives and contribute to a future where public transit is seamlessly integrated into the fabric of urban living.</p>
<p>As we move forward, it is imperative to continue exploring innovative solutions to transportation challenges. In addressing the complexities of urban mobility, we can foster cities that are not only smarter but also more inclusive and resilient in the face of ongoing change.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Public Transit Connectivity in Melbourne’s Bus Network</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Advancing smart urban planning: public transit connectivity and the case of melbourne’s bus network</p>
<p><strong>Article References</strong>:</p>
<p class="c-bibliographic-information__citation">Tiralosi, J., Gharehbaghi, K., Far, A.H. <i>et al.</i> Advancing smart urban planning: public transit connectivity and the case of melbourne’s bus network.<br />
                    <i>Discov Cities</i> <b>2</b>, 88 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44327-025-00127-6</p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI</strong>: <span class="c-bibliographic-information__value">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44327-025-00127-6</span></p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Urban Planning, Public Transit, Smart Technology, Data Analytics, Connectivity, Sustainability, Community Engagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">108711</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
