<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lutein &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/lutein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:21:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Novel Hybrid Cereal Tritordeum Bakes and Digests Differently Than Wheat, Study Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/novel-hybrid-cereal-tritordeum-bakes-and-digests-differently-than-wheat-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative grains in baking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baking quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bread wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparative analysis of hybrid and traditional cereals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of grain refinement on digestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fresh pasta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional food science research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gluten proteins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human digestion of hybrid cereals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybrid cereal grain digestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of grain milling methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in vitro digestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial milling processes for Tritordeum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lutein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutritional differences in Tritordeum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential health benefits of Tritordeum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resistant starch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rheology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starch digestibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tritordeum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tritordeum versus wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tritordeum's baking properties]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=265447</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new industrial-scale study shows the barley-wheat hybrid tritordeum forms weaker gluten but delivers higher protein digestibility and five times more resistant starch than bread wheat, with effects that depend on milling and product type.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A cereal that barely existed a few decades ago is now stepping into the spotlight of food science, and the latest research suggests it may reshape how bakers, pasta makers, and nutritionists think about alternative grains. Tritordeum, a hexaploid hybrid created by crossing a wild perennial barley from Chile with durum wheat, was commercially released in 2013, but only recently have scientists systematically traced its journey from the mill to the gut. A new study published in Current Research in Food Science has done exactly that, following a single tritordeum variety and a bread wheat variety through industrial roller and stone milling, four different product lines, and a full simulated human digestion. The results reveal a grain that behaves in ways neither of its parents fully predicts.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Giovanni D&#8217;Auria and Massimo Blandino, worked at a genuinely industrial scale, milling 100 tonnes of each grain at a commercial plant in Italy. Roller milling produced refined flour at a 78 percent extraction rate, while stone milling yielded semi-whole flour at 90 percent extraction. This distinction matters because the degree of refinement determines how much bran, germ, and fiber remain in the flour, and those components interact with proteins and starch in ways that ripple through every downstream process, from dough mixing to enzymatic breakdown in the intestine.</p>
<p>At the molecular level, the two cereals told strikingly different stories. Tritordeum flour contained roughly 17 percent protein compared with about 13 percent in bread wheat, and its gluten content was substantially higher as well. Yet more protein did not translate into a stronger gluten network. Electrophoretic and chromatographic profiling showed that tritordeum carried a lower relative proportion of high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits, the protein building blocks responsible for elasticity and dough strength. It also harbored hordein proteins inherited from its wild barley parent, including C-hordeins that lack cysteine residues and therefore cannot form the disulfide bonds that stitch a resilient gluten network together. The result was a dough that aggregated quickly under shear but lacked the mixing stability and elastic recovery of wheat dough.</p>
<p>Rheological testing confirmed this paradox. In the GlutoPeak test, tritordeum reached its aggregation peak faster and with higher torque than wheat, suggesting a firm, consistent aggregate forming under high-shear conditions. But in the Farinograph, tritordeum dough needed longer to develop and held its optimal consistency for a shorter time under continuous mixing. Water absorption was notably higher for tritordeum under both milling systems, a consequence of its elevated fiber and protein content competing with gluten proteins for available water. The Alveograph showed that stone-milled tritordeum dough was more resistant to deformation but less extensible, while its elasticity index was significantly lower than wheat under both milling conditions, indicating a reduced ability to spring back after stretching.</p>
<p>Starch behavior added another layer of distinction. Tritordeum starch required higher pasting temperatures and longer heating times before viscosity developed, and it reached a lower maximum viscosity than wheat starch. Its breakdown and setback values were also significantly lower, pointing to granules that swell slowly, resist disruption during prolonged heating, and reassociate weakly during cooling. Previous work on isolated tritordeum starch attributed this behavior to small granule size and a high lipid content that forms starch-lipid complexes and restricts water diffusion. These are not trivial differences; they shape how a flour performs in the oven and, as the digestion experiments later showed, how quickly its carbohydrates surrender to pancreatic enzymes.</p>
<p>To test whether these flour-level differences mattered in real food, the researchers produced fresh pasta, breadsticks, bread, and pizza bases from both flours and both milling streams. The outcomes were product-specific in a way that defies any simple ranking of the two cereals. Tritordeum breadsticks were consistently harder and tougher than wheat versions, a denser structure that suits a low-moisture product where fracture resistance is a virtue rather than a flaw. Fresh pasta made from stone-milled tritordeum was firmer and required more work of shear, while roller-milled tritordeum pasta absorbed more water during cooking without losing more solids. Pizza bases made with tritordeum were markedly softer than wheat versions under both milling systems, demonstrating that a weaker, less elastic gluten network can be an advantage when the goal is tenderness rather than loft.</p>
<p>Bread told the most nuanced story. Roller-milled tritordeum bread achieved a specific volume about 20 percent lower than wheat bread and was firmer to the touch, consistent with its limited gas retention. But when stone milling entered the picture, the volume gap vanished entirely, as bran particles disrupted gluten continuity in both cereals and dragged wheat bread down to tritordeum&#8217;s level. Intriguingly, the stone-milled tritordeum bread was actually softer than its wheat counterpart despite identical volumes, suggesting that its restricted starch retrogradation slowed crumb firming during cooling. Color added a visible signature: tritordeum flour and products showed substantially higher yellowness, reflecting carotenoid levels three to five times those of wheat, dominated by the xanthophyll lutein, which protects the retina from photochemical damage.</p>
<p>The digestion experiments, conducted with the standardized INFOGEST protocol simulating oral, gastric, and intestinal phases, produced perhaps the most consequential findings. Bread and pizza showed the highest overall protein digestibility for both cereals, indicating that their porous, baked structures facilitate enzymatic access. More remarkably, tritordeum bread and fresh pasta were digested significantly more completely than their wheat counterparts, with a higher apparent release of essential amino acids in the intestinal phase. The researchers attribute this to the less interconnected protein network of tritordeum, which leaves storage proteins more exposed to digestive enzymes. Glutamine and proline dominated the released amino acids, as expected from gluten proteins, but the tritordeum bread and pizza formulations released more of the essential ones.</p>
<p>Starch digestion in bread revealed an even more dramatic divergence. After 300 minutes of simulated duodenal digestion, the free glucose release kinetics were similar between the two breads, but the residual hydrolysable starch fraction was significantly lower in tritordeum, and its resistant starch content reached 3.5 grams per 100 grams of bread, five times the 0.7 grams measured in wheat bread and well above the 0.8 grams typical of conventional wheat loaves. Combined digestible starch fractions totaled roughly 51 grams of starch equivalents per 100 grams for tritordeum versus 58 for wheat, hinting at a lower glycemic load, though the authors caution that a static in vitro model cannot confirm postprandial effects in living humans and that static protocols may underestimate starch hydrolysis by prematurely inactivating salivary amylase.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s authors are careful to frame their conclusions within its limits: only one cultivar of each cereal was tested, and the observed differences reflect the combined effects of flour composition, hydration levels, and processing conditions rather than cereal identity alone. Still, the central message is clear and potentially transformative. The technological quality and nutritional fate of a cereal food cannot be predicted from flour composition or dough rheology alone; they emerge from the interplay of protein organization, fiber content, starch functionality, milling choice, and product structure. For tritordeum, that means it is neither a universal upgrade nor a downgrade relative to wheat, but a versatile raw material whose strengths, higher protein digestibility, dramatically more resistant starch, carotenoid richness, and softer textures in the right applications, must be matched to the right product. As consumers seek grains that are gentler on sensitive digestive systems, tritordeum has already shown tolerability in people with non-celiac wheat sensitivity and symptom improvement in irritable bowel syndrome patients, and this new matrix-level evidence gives the food industry a scientific roadmap for putting the golden hybrid to work.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Matrix-driven effects of tritordeum and wheat flours on the technological quality and digestibility of cereal-based foods</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> From milling to digestion: matrix-driven effects of tritordeum and wheat flours on the technological quality and digestibility of cereal-based foods</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> D’AURIA, G., SARDELLA, C., BRESCIANI, A., GRAZIUSO, F., NITRIDE, C., PELLEGRINO, L., FERRANTI, P., MARTI, A., &amp; BLANDINO, M. (2026). From milling to digestion: matrix-driven effects of tritordeum and wheat flours on the technological quality and digestibility of cereal-based foods. <em>Current Research in Food Science</em>, Article 101595. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2026.101595" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2026.101595</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2026.101595" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.crfs.2026.101595</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> tritordeum, bread wheat, milling, gluten proteins, starch digestibility, resistant starch, in vitro digestion, food matrix, rheology, lutein, baking quality, fresh pasta</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">265447</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Some Rice Panicles Turn White: A Single Genetic Fault Disrupts Chlorophyll&#8217;s Protective Shield</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/why-some-rice-panicles-turn-white-a-single-genetic-fault-disrupts-chlorophylls-protective-shield/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 21:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[albino rice plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carotenoids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chlorophyll biosynthesis disruption in rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chloroplast biogenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chloroplast development in rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic basis of rice pigmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of genetic mutations on rice yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lutein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural rice panicle mutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panicle albinism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoprotection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reactive oxygen species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice genetic mutation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice metabolome analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice panicle mutation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice reproductive tissue biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice transcriptome profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thylakoid formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcriptomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white rice panicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wpb1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xanthophyll cycle]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=259958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in China have traced a rice mutant's white panicle branches to a failure in carotenoid-based photoprotection that collapses chloroplast development and triggers fatal oxidative stress.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rice feeds more people than any other staple crop, and the architecture of its grain-bearing panicle is central to how much food each plant can produce. Yet even in one of the most intensively studied crops on Earth, fundamental questions about how reproductive tissues build their photosynthetic machinery have remained unanswered. A research team led by scientists at Guangxi University in Nanning, China, has now dissected one of the strangest and most visually striking anomalies in rice biology: a natural mutant in which the panicle branches, instead of turning green, emerge ghostly white. The study, published in BMC Plant Biology, combines transcriptome and metabolome profiling to trace exactly where the greening program collapses, and the answer reveals a delicate dependency between chloroplast construction and the pigments that protect it.</p>
<p>The mutant, named wpb1 for white panicle branch, was identified as a natural variant in rice. Its most obvious feature is the albino coloration of the panicle branches, the slender axes that carry the developing grains. But the defect is not confined to the reproductive stage. When the researchers examined hybrid progenies carrying the mutation, seedlings segregated for the trait as well, indicating that the underlying genetic lesion interferes with chloroplast development across different tissues and life stages. That pattern of segregation in offspring is a classic signature of a recessive mutation, and it gave the team a reliable genetic handle for tracking the trait through breeding populations.</p>
<p>To understand what was going wrong inside the white tissue, the team turned to transmission-level phenotypic analysis of chloroplast development across defined stages. In wild-type plants, the early stages of panicle development, stages III and IV, are when proplastids, the undifferentiated precursors of chloroplasts, begin to proliferate and commit to building the internal membrane machinery of photosynthesis. In the wpb1 mutant, this proliferation was already limited. Proplastids failed to multiply and expand at the rate seen in green panicles, setting the mutant on a developmental trajectory that diverged early. The consequences became catastrophic later: by stages VI and VII, when wild-type panicle tissues are assembling mature chloroplasts with stacked thylakoid membranes, the mutant tissue showed a complete failure of thylakoid formation. Without thylakoids, there is no grana, no stroma lamellae, and no photosynthetic electron transport chain. The tissue simply cannot green.</p>
<p>What makes the new study more than a description of a broken chloroplast is the integrative approach the authors took. Rather than examining genes or metabolites in isolation, they profiled both simultaneously, comparing young panicles at stage III from green and white plants (samples designated G3 and W3) and again at stage VI (G6 and W6). This two-time-point design allowed them to catch the molecular cascade at the onset of phenotypic divergence and then follow it into full-blown failure. Transcriptomic sequencing revealed thousands of genes whose expression shifted between mutant and wild type, while liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry-based metabolomics captured the chemical consequences of those transcriptional changes. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis and principal component analysis separated the samples cleanly, confirming that the metabolic state of white panicle tissue is genuinely distinct rather than a subtle variation on the wild-type profile.</p>
<p>The pivotal finding emerged from the earliest time point. At the onset of divergence between green and white panicles, genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis were significantly downregulated in the mutant. Carotenoids are the yellow and orange accessory pigments that do far more than add color to plant tissue. Among their roles, they perform an indispensable photoprotective function: quenching singlet oxygen and dissipating the energy of excited chlorophyll molecules before those molecules can transfer electrons to oxygen and trigger a cascade of reactive oxygen species. Lutein, one of the major xanthophyll pigments, was among the compounds affected. The loss of carotenoid biosynthesis gene expression therefore meant the developing mutant tissue was building its photosynthetic apparatus without a functioning safety net.</p>
<p>The consequences unfolded exactly as the photoprotection model predicts. With insufficient carotenoids to quench excited chlorophyll and singlet oxygen, the mutant&#8217;s photosynthetic apparatus suffered oxidative damage. The team observed a sustained upregulation of reactive oxygen species responses and heat shock responses in the white tissue, the molecular fingerprints of a cell under chronic photooxidative stress. Heat shock proteins are typically induced when proteins begin to misfold, and their persistent activation alongside ROS-responsive genes indicated that the white panicle tissue was mounting a desperate, and ultimately futile, defense. The authors propose a model in which the failure to quench singlet oxygen and excited chlorophyll molecules via the xanthophyll cycle ultimately blocks greening altogether: the tissue accumulates oxidative damage faster than it can assemble functional chloroplasts, and the greening program collapses before it can complete.</p>
<p>Beyond the photoprotection story, the metabolomic data revealed that the mutation rewires core metabolism far more broadly than the chloroplast alone. The researchers documented changes in many central metabolic pathways, including those for alanine and isoprenoids. Isoprenoid metabolism is intimately connected to the plastid because carotenoids, chlorophyll side chains, and a host of hormones and signaling molecules are all built from isoprenoid precursors. A shift in this pathway is therefore not a side effect but part of the systemic reorganization of a cell whose plastids have failed. Alanine metabolism, meanwhile, connects to nitrogen assimilation and the carbon–nitrogen balance of developing tissue, suggesting that the mutant redirects resources in ways that reflect both the loss of photosynthetic capacity and the stress state imposed by ROS accumulation.</p>
<p>The study also situates wpb1 within a growing family of rice albino mutants that have collectively become workhorses for chloroplast biology. The authors note that leaf and whole-panicle albinism has been extensively studied as a model for chloroplast biogenesis, with related mutants including white leaf and panicle (WLP), white stripe panicle (WSP), thermo-sensitive virescent (TSV), and thermo-sensitive chlorophyll-deficient (TCD) lines. What has been poorly understood until now is tissue-specific chloroplast development in reproductive organs, and specifically how panicle branch tissues manage photoprotection under the developmental constraints of the reproductive stage. Panicle branches face a unique environment: they develop inside and then emerge from the flag leaf sheath, experiencing rapid light transitions while carrying the crop&#8217;s yield. The wpb1 mutant demonstrates that this tissue depends on the same carotenoid-based photoprotection that guards leaves, but its failure there has distinct developmental dynamics, with proplastid defects visible as early as stage III.</p>
<p>For crop science, the implications run in two directions. First, the identification of a key node where wpb1 disrupts the coordination between photoprotective pigment accumulation and chloroplast development provides a molecular target for understanding, and potentially manipulating, how reproductive tissues balance light harvesting against light damage. Chlorophyll-deficient mutants are not merely curiosities; they are used in hybrid rice seed production, where seedling albinism can serve as a visible marker to identify and remove hybrid offspring, and understanding the genetic basis of such traits makes them easier to deploy or eliminate deliberately. Second, the study adds to the evidence that photoprotection is not an optional accessory to chloroplast biogenesis but a prerequisite for it. A chloroplast that assembles its light-harvesting machinery without carotenoid shielding destroys itself in the process, a lesson that applies well beyond rice.</p>
<p>The work, supported by the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation and other regional and national programs, exemplifies the power of multi-omics approaches to resolve complex developmental phenotypes. By pairing a precise phenotypic timeline with matched transcriptomic and metabolomic snapshots, the team transformed a puzzling white panicle into a coherent mechanistic narrative: a genetic lesion suppresses carotenoid biosynthesis, photoprotection fails, singlet oxygen accumulates, thylakoid assembly never completes, and the tissue remains white. As the authors conclude, the findings identify a key regulatory node where pigment accumulation and chloroplast development must be coordinated, offering new insights into the genetic regulation of photosynthesis in rice panicle branches and a valuable resource for anyone seeking to engineer more resilient photosynthetic tissue in the world&#8217;s most important grain crop.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Genetic and molecular mechanisms of chloroplast biogenesis failure and photoprotection loss in albino rice panicle branches</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Integrative transcriptome and metabolome analyses to uncover rice panicle branch albinism</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Cai, Z., Ahmad, S., Jin, G., Shen, Y., Zhao, H., Chen, Y., Fan, Y., Zhang, Y., Xiao, B., Wang, Q., Qiu, Y., &amp; Yang, J. (2026). Integrative transcriptome and metabolome analyses to uncover rice panicle branch albinism. <em>BMC Plant Biology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09929-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09929-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09929-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s12870-026-09929-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> rice, panicle albinism, wpb1, chloroplast biogenesis, carotenoids, xanthophyll cycle, reactive oxygen species, transcriptomics, metabolomics, thylakoid formation, photoprotection, lutein</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">259958</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Solvents and Ball Mills Team Up to Pull Valuable Lutein from Microalgae</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/green-solvents-and-ball-mills-team-up-to-pull-valuable-lutein-from-microalgae/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 22:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidant carotenoid extraction techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ball milling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ball milling extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biorefinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carotenoids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chlorella pyrenoidosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly solvent technologies in food industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly solvent methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green solvents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lutein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microalgae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microalgae harvesting for eye health supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microalgae lutein extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microalgae-based lutein production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural deep eutectic solvents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe extraction of lutein from Chlorella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scalable microalgae pigment extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solvent recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable carotenoid recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal stability]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=210886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers developed a ball milling-assisted method using plant-derived natural deep eutectic solvents that recovers lutein from microalgae more efficiently, safely, and sustainably than conventional solvents while also protecting the fragile pigment from degradation.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lutein, the golden-yellow pigment that accumulates in the human retina and shields our eyes from damaging light, has long been harvested the hard way: from marigold petals grown seasonally, picked and separated by hand. Now researchers have unveiled a greener, faster route to this prized carotenoid, one that starts not in a flower field but in a vat of microscopic algae, and relies on solvents whose ingredients could plausibly come from a kitchen pantry. A team led by Gul Muhammad reports in the journal Results in Chemistry a ball milling-assisted extraction method that uses natural deep eutectic solvents, or NADESs, to recover lutein from Chlorella pyrenoidosa more efficiently, more safely, and with far less environmental baggage than conventional organic solvents.</p>
<p>The stakes are considerable. Lutein is the second most valuable carotenoid produced from microalgae after astaxanthin, feeding a global market currently worth about 309 million US dollars and projected to reach 406 million by 2026. Beyond supplements and food additives, the pigment&#8217;s potent antioxidant activity has made it a fixture of research into human eye health. Traditional extraction, however, leans on solvents such as tetrahydrofuran, acetone, and diethyl ether, all of which are flammable, volatile, and raise toxicity concerns. Supercritical carbon dioxide offers an alternative but demands heavy energy inputs, while ionic liquids, though effective, are costly to synthesize and not readily biodegradable, hampering their scale-up.</p>
<p>NADESs occupy a sweet spot between performance and sustainability. These solvents form when a hydrogen bond acceptor, such as the plant-derived compound thymol, is mixed with a hydrogen bond donor, such as decanoic acid or isoborneol, and gently heated. The components melt together into a liquid whose hydrogen bonding network gives it unusual solvation powers. Unlike conventional solvents, they require no purification step, generate no synthetic waste, and break down readily in the environment. Crucially for carotenoid work, many NADESs also suppress oxidative degradation, meaning the pigment they extract tends to survive longer.</p>
<p>In the new study, the researchers synthesized six different NADES formulations and characterized them thoroughly using infrared spectroscopy, viscometry, and density measurements. The telltale signature of successful eutectic formation appeared in the spectra: the hydroxyl stretching band of thymol shifted from roughly 3175 to 3418 inverse centimeters, and the carbonyl band of decanoic acid moved to higher wavenumbers, confirming that hydrogen bonds had stitched the components into a new liquid. Densities fell between 0.90 and 0.94 grams per cubic centimeter, while viscosities spanned a wide range, from a pourable 11.67 to a sluggish 98.40 millipascal-seconds at room temperature, a property the team knew would matter enormously for mass transfer during extraction.</p>
<p>The real innovation, however, came before any solvent touched the algae. Chlorella cells are wrapped in tough cell walls that resist solvent penetration, so the team pretreated the biomass in a planetary ball mill, essentially a jar of grinding beads that pulverizes the cells through high-speed collisions. Optimizing three variables proved decisive. Milling for 30 minutes at 400 revolutions per minute with a biomass-to-beads ratio of 1:30 lifted the lutein yield from 0.61 to 2.02 milligrams per gram of dry biomass. Pushing the speed to 500 rpm actually backfired: centrifugal forces compacted the biomass into a cake layer on the jar walls and balls, wasting energy and partially degrading the pigment. Scanning electron microscopy revealed the physical aftermath, with pretreated cells visibly ruptured and shrunken, and surface area measurements confirmed the effect, rising from 4.13 to 7.30 square meters per gram after milling.</p>
<p>When the milled biomass met the solvent candidates, one formulation stood out. A 1:1 mixture of thymol and isoborneol, designated N3, outperformed all five competitors and beat the conventional solvent ethyl acetate, which yielded only 1.62 milligrams per gram. The researchers note that these particular thymol and menthol-based eutectic mixtures had never previously been applied to lutein recovery from microalgae. The chemistry of the extracts told its own story: acid-containing NADESs produced yellowish extracts as acidic conditions converted chlorophylls into pheophytins, stripping magnesium from the porphyrin ring, while the non-acidic N3 yielded the green tinge characteristic of intact chlorophyll co-extraction.</p>
<p>Fine-tuning the extraction itself pushed yields higher still. A solid-to-liquid ratio of 0.067 grams per milliliter proved optimal, delivering 33.86 percent more lutein than a leaner ratio, while diluting the NADES with ethanol to a 50:50 blend cut viscosity dramatically, from the neat solvent down to under 2 millipascal-seconds in some dilutions, and boosted recovery to 2.34 milligrams per gram. A single extraction cycle sufficed to capture most of the pigment, a direct payoff of the ball milling pretreatment, though additional cycles squeezed out further gains.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most forward-looking result concerns solvent recycling, a persistent headache for eutectic solvent chemistry because the strong molecular interactions that make NADESs good extractants also make them hard to separate from the extracted compounds. Using a graphitized carbon black cartridge in a solid-phase extraction setup, the team demonstrated that the NADES-ethanol blend retained 88.40 percent of its original extraction efficiency after one recycling cycle, 82.46 percent after two, and still a workable 70.89 percent after three. The trapped lutein itself could be eluted from the cartridge with 2-methyltetrahydrofuran, recovered at 56.41 percent efficiency, meaning neither the pigment nor the solvent is simply thrown away.</p>
<p>The NADES system also proved a better bodyguard for the delicate pigment. Lutein degrades under heat, light, and oxygen, and isomerizes into less useful forms when overheated. In thermal challenge tests at 40, 60, and 80 degrees Celsius, lutein dissolved in the NADES-ethanol blend degraded just 2.53 percent in the first half hour at 40 degrees, compared with 7.05 percent in methanol, and after 150 minutes the NADES sample still held 85.1 percent of its lutein versus 81.02 percent for the methanol control. Half-life calculations underscored the difference: 608 minutes at 40 degrees Celsius in the NADES blend against 450 minutes in methanol. Thermodynamic analysis showed the degradation required more activation energy in the NADES system, 18.73 versus 11.79 kilojoules per mole, meaning the solvent imposes a higher energy barrier against breakdown, and positive Gibbs free energy values confirmed the pigment does not degrade spontaneously in either medium.</p>
<p>A formal sustainability audit sealed the comparison. Using the Green Analytical Procedure Index, which scores every stage of a method from reagents to waste disposal with color-coded pictograms, the NADES-based process earned six green, seven yellow, and two red ratings, while a traditional organic solvent extraction scored three green, eight yellow, and four red. The gap stemmed chiefly from safer extractants and recyclable solvent handling. Taken together, the findings sketch a pipeline in which rapidly grown, carbon-sequestering microalgae are shattered by precisely tuned mechanical forces, their lutein dissolved in plant-derived liquids that can be reused repeatedly, and the pigment protected all the way to the bottle. For a market hungry for natural antioxidants, that combination of efficiency, mildness, and green credentials may be exactly what sustainable carotenoid production has been waiting for.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Sustainable extraction of the carotenoid lutein from microalgae using ball milling and natural deep eutectic solvents</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Efficient ball milling assisted approach to recover lutein from microalgae biomass with natural deep eutectic solvents</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Muhammad, G., Yuan, X., Li, Z., Zhang, X., &amp; Zhang, Z. (2026). Efficient ball milling assisted approach to recover lutein from microalgae biomass with natural deep eutectic solvents. <em>Results in Chemistry, 30</em>, Article 103861. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103861" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103861</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103861" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103861</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> lutein, microalgae, Chlorella pyrenoidosa, natural deep eutectic solvents, ball milling, green extraction, carotenoids, antioxidants, solvent recycling, thermal stability, biorefinery, sustainability</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">210886</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
