<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lost river system in Europe &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/lost-river-system-in-europe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 07:03:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Ancient Zircons Reveal a Lost River System That Carved Europe&#8217;s Deep Past</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ancient-zircons-reveal-a-lost-river-system-that-carved-europes-deep-past/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 07:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ancient zircon dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avalonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baltica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bohemian Massif]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bohemian Massif geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brunia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brunia crust fragment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caledonides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detrital zircon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devonian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Devonian sediment dispersal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early European landmass reconstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ediacaran and Cambrian sediments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe's geological history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lost river system in Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lu-Hf isotopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neoproterozoic volcanic arc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rheic Ocean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment transport in ancient Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U-Pb geochronology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Variscan Mountain formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Variscan orogeny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zircon crystals as geological records]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=252449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New detrital zircon evidence from the Czech Republic shows that the Brunia terrane shared an ancient arc with Avalonia and was already connected to Baltica by the Early Devonian, while revealing a vast Caledonian sediment fan that stretched from Greenland to Turkey.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buried beneath the rolling hills of the eastern Czech Republic lies one of geology&#8217;s most stubborn puzzles: a fragment of ancient crust called Brunia, whose journey across the globe hundreds of millions of years ago has divided researchers for decades. Now, a team of scientists led by Stephen Collett of the Czech Geological Survey has extracted a remarkably detailed travel diary from the most unlikely of sources — tiny, durable crystals of zircon eroded out of mountains long since vanished and locked inside Devonian sandstones and conglomerates. Their findings, published in the journal Solid Earth, redraw the map of early Europe and reveal a sediment dispersal system of almost continental scale.</p>
<p>Brunia, sometimes known by its older name Brunovistulia, forms the easternmost corner of the Bohemian Massif, the great block of old rocks that anchors Central Europe. Its foundation is a late Neoproterozoic volcanic arc complex, built by magmas rising above a subduction zone roughly 630 to 580 million years ago, and capped by Ediacaran and early Cambrian sediments. During the Carboniferous collision that built the Variscan Mountains, the western edge of Brunia was thrust eastward over its own relatively undeformed interior, creating the Moravian and Silesian nappes. But where Brunia actually sat on the Paleozoic globe — attached to the microcontinent Avalonia, welded to Baltica, or bound to its Bohemian neighbors — has remained fiercely contested.</p>
<p>The new study attacked the problem with detrital zircon geochronology, a technique that exploits zircon&#8217;s extraordinary resistance to erosion and its ability to trap uranium and hafnium isotopes at crystallization. The team analyzed 19 samples from Devonian clastic strata across Brunia&#8217;s basin systems, from shallow marine quartzites in the north to deep-water turbidites near Brno. A total of 2,407 uranium-lead isotopic analyses yielded 2,184 concordant ages, supplemented by 241 hafnium isotope measurements that fingerprint the mantle or crustal origin of each zircon&#8217;s parent magma. The result was not one story but two, sharply and unexpectedly different.</p>
<p>Fourteen of the samples, labeled Type-1, produced nearly unimodal age spectra dominated by zircons between roughly 590 and 620 million years old, with fewer than 3 percent of grains older than 720 million years. Their hafnium signatures were strikingly juvenile, with epsilon-Hf values mostly between +4 and +10, indicating derivation from primitive magmas rather than recycled old crust. This signature points squarely at the Slavkov Domain, the juvenile arc granitoids preserved within Brunia&#8217;s own basement. In other words, most Devonian rivers draining Brunia were simply recycling their own Ediacaran arc, grain by grain, with little input from anywhere else.</p>
<p>That local story, however, carries a global message. When the team compared Brunia&#8217;s zircon spectra with datasets from around the North Atlantic realm, the closest match was not to neighboring terranes of the Bohemian Massif but to the late Neoproterozoic strata of West Avalonia on the Avalon Peninsula of Newfoundland. There, more than 90 percent of zircons fall in the same 900 to 485 million year window, and the hafnium values are similarly positive. The implication is that Brunia and West Avalonia shared a single Neoproterozoic volcanic arc system near the Gondwanan margin before drifting apart — a kinship that, according to faunal and paleomagnetic evidence, had already been severed by the early Cambrian, when Brunia appears to have docked against Baltica.</p>
<p>Just as telling is what the data exclude. Ediacaran and Cambrian strata elsewhere in the Bohemian Massif — in Teplá-Barrandia and Saxo-Thuringia — show far broader age spectra and much wider, often negative, hafnium ranges, indicating additional crustal sources that Brunia lacks. The study therefore argues against models that weld Brunia, Teplá-Barrandia, and Saxo-Thuringia into one continuous crustal domain, suggesting instead that Brunia occupied an oceanward, fore-arc position relative to its cratonward Bohemian neighbors. Nor do the data support the idea that Brunia was the main supplier of the late Neoproterozoic zircons found across Baltica&#8217;s southwestern margin, whose sources were more diverse than Brunia alone could provide.</p>
<p>The second provenance signature, Type-2, came from five samples confined to the Vrbno Facies Domain in northern Brunia, and it is a different world entirely. Here the spectra are multimodal, with 89 percent of concordant analyses falling between 2,100 and 900 million years ago, prominent peaks near 1,670 million years, abundant Stenian to early Tonian grains, a scattering of Neoarchean zircons, and — crucially — a modest but decisive population of Late Ordovician to Silurian grains between 458 and 433 million years old. Statistical comparison using multi-dimensional scaling confirmed that this signature matches nothing within Brunia&#8217;s own basement. The zircons had to come from somewhere else entirely.</p>
<p>The answer, the authors conclude, is the Caledonian Mountains of Fennoscandia. Type-2 spectra closely resemble those of Late Ordovician and Silurian sandstones of the Oslo Rift and match Lower Devonian strata across an astonishing sweep of Laurussia: the Harz Mountains and Rhenish Massif of Germany, the Mid-German Crystalline Rise, the Baltic Basin of Estonia, the Anglo-Welsh Basin, North Dobrogea in Romania, and even the Istanbul Zone of northwestern Turkey. Similar signatures extend to the Orcadian Basin of Scotland, East Greenland, Svalbard, Novaya Zemlya, and the Acadian foreland basin of North America. Together they trace a vast sedimentary fan — a network of rivers, deltas, and seas dispersing Caledonian detritus across half a hemisphere during the late Silurian and Early Devonian, an Old Red Sandstone continent in full spate.</p>
<p>For Brunia, the presence of this Caledonian fingerprint in Devonian strata is direct proof that by Early Devonian time the terrane lay within reach of rivers draining the Scandinavian Caledonides — firm evidence of its connection to Baltica. Equally significant is where the signature stops. The Type-2 spectra are essentially absent from the internal domains of the European Variscides, and Devonian strata in Saxo-Thuringia instead carry Stenian zircons with the wide, negative hafnium ranges typical of Gondwanan sources. The lack of mixing between these two provenance signals implies that a barrier — most plausibly the still-open Rheic Ocean, or some formidable orographic divide — separated Brunia from the internal Bohemian Massif throughout the Devonian.</p>
<p>That conclusion places the Rheic suture, the scar of the vanished ocean, somewhere inside the Bohemian Massif itself rather than along its traditional boundary at the Moldanubian Thrust Zone. Recent discoveries of Mesoproterozoic crustal material deep within Moldanubia only deepen the mystery. Resolving it, the authors argue, will require targeted provenance studies of the region&#8217;s high-grade metamorphic rocks — a reminder that some of Earth&#8217;s most consequential geography is still hidden in the oldest grains beneath our feet.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Detrital zircon provenance analysis of Devonian sedimentary strata of the Brunia terrane in the Bohemian Massif</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> A vast Caledonian fan and an Ediacaran arc: the contrasting provenance of Devonian clastics of Brunia (Bohemian Massif)</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Collett, S., Soejono, I., Kumpan, T., Hanžl, P., Míková, J., Novotná, N., &amp; Sláma, J. (2026). A vast Caledonian fan and an Ediacaran arc: the contrasting provenance of Devonian clastics of Brunia (Bohemian Massif). <em>Solid Earth, 17</em>(6), 867-893. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-17-867-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.5194/se-17-867-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/se-17-867-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.5194/se-17-867-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Brunia, Bohemian Massif, detrital zircon, U-Pb geochronology, Lu-Hf isotopes, Devonian, Caledonides, Avalonia, Baltica, Rheic Ocean, Variscan orogeny, provenance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">252449</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
