<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>limestone calcined clay cement &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/limestone-calcined-clay-cement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 21:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Pre-Soaked Ceramic Particles Turn Low-Carbon Cement Into Lightweight, Chloride-Proof Concrete</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/pre-soaked-ceramic-particles-turn-low-carbon-cement-into-lightweight-chloride-proof-concrete/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 21:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capillary absorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carboaluminate hydrates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chloride resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chloride-resistant marine concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compressive strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly building materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhanced durability in reinforced structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental benefits of lightweight concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal curing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LC3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LC3 cement technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightweight aggregate concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightweight concrete with pre-soaked ceramic particles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limestone calcined clay cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon cement innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-weight high-strength concrete applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pore structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porous aggregate for structural strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismic-resistant lightweight concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shale ceramsite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shale ceramsite as internal water reservoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction materials]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=260050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Scientists combined pre-wetted shale ceramsite with limestone calcined clay cement to create a lightweight mortar that is stronger per kilogram than conventional concrete and highly resistant to chloride penetration.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concrete is the most widely used building material on Earth, but its weight is a silent tax on every structure it forms. Heavy concrete demands beefier foundations, adds seismic mass in earthquake zones, and complicates the retrofitting of aging bridges and towers. A new study published in Case Studies in Construction Materials reports a way to slash that weight without sacrificing strength or durability, by pairing two sustainability workhorses of modern construction: limestone calcined clay cement, known as LC3, and pre-wetted shale ceramsite, a porous, lightweight aggregate that doubles as an internal water reservoir. The result is a mortar that is lighter than conventional mixes, stronger per kilogram than ordinary C50 concrete, and dramatically more resistant to chloride ion penetration, the chief enemy of reinforced structures in marine environments.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Qiaoyun Wu, Zhifeng Xu, Xuyong Chen, and Shukai Cheng, set out to resolve a long-standing trade-off. Lightweight aggregate concrete reduces structural dead load, improves thermal insulation, and lowers seismic forces, which is why it appeals to builders of high-rises, long-span bridges, and coastal infrastructure. But lightweight aggregates are inherently weaker and more porous than natural sand and stone, so piling them into a mix eventually erodes mechanical performance. Earlier work on ultra-high-performance concrete showed that strength first rises and then falls as lightweight aggregate content increases, peaking at moderate replacement levels. The question was whether the superior chemistry of LC3 could compensate for higher doses of a weak, porous aggregate, and whether pre-soaking that aggregate could tip the balance further.</p>
<p>LC3 itself is one of the most promising low-carbon binders in cement science. It blends ordinary Portland cement with calcined clay and limestone powder, typically replacing 30 to 50 percent of the clinker. That substitution cuts carbon dioxide emissions by roughly 30 percent, from about 834 kilograms of CO2 per tonne of cement down to about 556 kilograms, while delivering 28-day strengths comparable to ordinary Portland cement. The magic lies in a synergistic reaction: aluminate species released by the calcined clay react with carbonate ions from the limestone to form carboaluminate hydrates, known as hemicarbonate and monocarbonate phases, alongside additional calcium-aluminosilicate gel. These phases fill pores, consume portlandite, and refine the microscopic architecture of the hardened paste.</p>
<p>Shale ceramsite, the second ingredient, is an expanded, sintered clay aggregate with an apparent density of 1720 kilograms per cubic meter and a water absorption capacity of 5.3 percent. Its porous interior can soak up water and release it later, a property the researchers exploited through internal curing. In the experiments, the ceramsite was either used dry or fully pre-wetted to its saturated surface-dry condition. The pre-wetting water was carefully subtracted from the mixing water so that every mixture shared the same effective water-to-binder ratio of 0.4, ensuring that any performance differences could be attributed to the internal reservoir effect rather than to extra free water. The sand-to-binder ratio was varied from 1.1 to 1.5, and the binder was held constant at 420 parts cement, 120 parts metakaolin, and 60 parts limestone powder per cubic meter.</p>
<p>The mechanical results were striking. All mixtures weighed in below 1700 kilograms per cubic meter when oven-dried, comfortably satisfying the lightweight mortar criterion of 2000 kilograms per cubic meter under EN 206-1. As expected, increasing the aggregate content reduced both density and strength. But the pre-wetted series consistently outperformed its dry-aggregate twin at 7 and 28 days, with the best formulation showing a 10.8 percent gain in 28-day compressive strength at the lowest aggregate ratio. Flexural strength told a subtler story: it fell by 25 to 35 percent as ceramsite content rose, a steeper decline than the 17 to 18 percent seen in compression. The porous particles act as preferential crack initiation sites under tension, while under compression the matrix can redistribute load around the softer inclusions. Pre-wetting strengthens the interfacial transition zone through enhanced local hydration but cannot fully erase the aggregate&#8217;s intrinsic weakness.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most commercially compelling number is specific strength, the ratio of compressive strength to density. Across a 36 percent increase in ceramsite dosage, the specific strength of both series remained remarkably stable, and the optimal pre-wetted mixes exceeded 50 megapascals with specific strengths above 0.03 megapascals per unit density. Conventional C50 concrete manages only 0.017 to 0.021, meaning the new material delivers roughly 1.7 to 2.0 times the strength per unit weight. That efficiency translates directly into slimmer columns, lighter foundations, and smaller seismic inertia forces, savings that compound across an entire structure.</p>
<p>Durability results were even more dramatic. In capillary water absorption tests, the pre-wetted mixes absorbed 64 to 67 percent less water over 150 hours than their dry-aggregate counterparts at identical aggregate ratios. Electric flux measurements, a standard proxy for chloride penetrability, told the same story: the pre-wetted mortars showed 59 to 80 percent lower flux, and the best mix registered below 100 coulombs, placing it in the very low permeability class, a level normally associated with high-performance concrete. For marine and coastal construction, where chloride-induced rebar corrosion is the dominant failure mode, that classification carries real practical weight.</p>
<p>The microstructural evidence explains why. X-ray diffraction revealed stronger hemicarbonate and monocarbonate peaks in the pre-wetted samples, confirming that the sustained internal water supply accelerates the signature LC3 reaction between metakaolin-derived aluminate and limestone carbonate. Thermogravimetric analysis quantified the shift: the best pre-wetted mix contained more carboaluminate hydrates and more calcium-aluminosilicate gel while consuming portlandite, converting a relatively inert crystalline byproduct into pore-filling binding phases. Non-evaporable water content, a proxy for hydration degree, was consistently higher in the pre-wetted series, and scanning electron microscopy showed fewer unhydrated clinker grains, fewer portlandite crystals, and a denser, crack-free matrix.</p>
<p>Mercury intrusion porosimetry completed the picture. The pre-wetted mortar with the lowest aggregate ratio achieved the highest gel pore fraction, 47.2 percent, and the lowest macroporosity, just 3.1 percent, with the pore size distribution shifting decisively toward fine capillary and gel pores. Because capillary water uptake is governed by large capillary pores while chloride migration depends on the connectivity of the whole network, this refinement suppresses both transport mechanisms simultaneously. The authors are careful to note that electric flux reflects pore solution chemistry as well as pore structure, and they recommend confirmation through long-term chloride migration and diffusion testing, along with studies of carbonation, freeze-thaw, and sulfate resistance.</p>
<p>The sustainability ledger is nuanced but favorable. Sintering ceramsite consumes about 0.534 gigajoules per tonne, nearly eight times the energy of natural sand, because the process requires kilns running at 1100 to 1250 degrees Celsius. Yet the aggregate can be made from industrial wastes such as fly ash and coal gangue, its lightness shrinks foundation and reinforcement demands, its insulating blocks cut building heating and cooling loads, and its low bulk density reduces transport emissions per cubic meter. Weighed over a full life cycle, the authors argue, these operational and structural savings outweigh the production penalty. Combined with LC3&#8217;s 30 percent carbon advantage at the binder stage, the system points toward a generation of lightweight, high-strength, chloride-resistant concrete suited to the decarbonized, resilient infrastructure the coming decades demand.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Internal curing and phase assembly in limestone calcined clay cement mortar with pre-wetted shale ceramsite</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Synergistic internal curing and phase assembly in limestone calcined clay cement mortar incorporating pre-wetted shale ceramsite: Mechanical properties, chloride resistance, and pore structure refinement</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wu, Q., Xu, Z., Chen, X., &amp; Cheng, S. (2026). Synergistic internal curing and phase assembly in limestone calcined clay cement mortar incorporating pre-wetted shale ceramsite: Mechanical properties, chloride resistance, and pore structure refinement. <em>Case Studies in Construction Materials, 25</em>, Article e06607. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06607" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06607</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06607" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06607</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> limestone calcined clay cement, LC3, shale ceramsite, lightweight aggregate concrete, internal curing, chloride resistance, pore structure, carboaluminate hydrates, sustainable construction, compressive strength, capillary absorption, low-carbon cement</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">260050</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aluminum Waste Red Mud Could Replace Clay in Low-Carbon Cement</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/aluminum-waste-red-mud-could-replace-clay-in-low-carbon-cement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alumina production waste utilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aluminum industry waste management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aluminum waste red mud reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayer red mud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcium oxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compressive strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly cement formulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of red mud disposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fly ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green building materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metal containment in construction waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metal leaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydration products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial waste valorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative cement manufacturing processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LC3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LC3 limestone calcined clay cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limestone calcined clay cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon cement alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pozzolanic reaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red mud as sustainable construction material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[red mud replacing clay in cement production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=218134</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers showed that untreated Bayer red mud, blended with fly ash, can fully replace calcined clay in limestone calcined clay cement while matching strength and safely immobilizing heavy metals.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, the global aluminum industry buries itself a little deeper in its own waste. For every ton of alumina extracted from bauxite ore through the Bayer process, roughly 0.8 to 1.8 tons of a caustic, rust-colored sludge known as red mud are left behind. Most of this material ends up in vast dry or wet stockpiles that consume land and threaten soil and water with their heavy metal content. Treating it can swallow up to 5 percent of the cost of producing alumina, yet worldwide, less than 10 percent of red mud is ever reused. Now, a team of Chinese researchers has reported a way to turn this liability into a core ingredient of one of the most promising low-carbon cements ever developed, using the waste not as a token additive but as a complete replacement for the calcined clay at the heart of the formulation.</p>
<p>The cement in question is limestone calcined clay cement, or LC3, a binder that has generated enormous excitement in the construction industry because it can swap out half or more of the carbon-intensive clinker in ordinary Portland cement while preserving mechanical performance. In its classic form, LC3 blends 50 percent clinker, 30 percent calcined clay, 15 percent limestone, and 5 percent gypsum. The magic lies in the pozzolanic chemistry: metakaolin in the heat-treated clay reacts with calcium hydroxide released by clinker hydration, while limestone fills the pore space and participates in the formation of carboaluminate phases. The result is a cement that can cut the industry&#8217;s carbon dioxide emissions by roughly 40 percent. But there is a catch. In many countries, clay resources suitable for calcination are protected by regulations, restricting large-scale extraction and threatening the scalability of the technology.</p>
<p>Red mud looks, on paper, like an ideal substitute. It is rich in alumina and silica, the same reactive oxides that make calcined clay valuable, and it arrives pre-alkaline, with a pH of 10.35, which could help activate other sluggish ingredients. The researchers, publishing in Case Studies in Construction Materials, obtained Bayer red mud from Shandong Xinfa Group and made a deliberate choice: they used it raw, with no energy-hungry heat treatment. Previous work had suggested that firing red mud at around 600 degrees Celsius improves its performance, but the gains were modest, with a strength activity index of 76.9 percent for heat-treated material versus 67.1 percent for untreated. Skipping the kiln entirely keeps the process simple and keeps the carbon savings intact.</p>
<p>What the raw material lacks in pozzolanic punch, it makes up for in physical finesse. Laser particle sizing revealed a median particle diameter of just 1.06 micrometers, far finer than the calcined clay it replaces, and a staggering specific surface area of 6,897 square meters per kilogram. Scanning electron microscopy showed rough, porous particles with sharp edges, micropores, and fine cracks, plus smaller grains clinging to larger ones in agglomerates that expose dangling bonds and unsaturated chemical sites. In a cement paste, such ultrafine particles pack into the gaps between coarser grains, act as nucleation sites where hydration products can anchor, and accelerate the early reactions of the cement&#8217;s calcium silicate phases.</p>
<p>The team formulated five mixes, all with a water-to-binder ratio of 0.5: a reference LC3 with 30 percent calcined clay, three red mud systems at 10, 20, and 30 percent replacement, a red mud plus fly ash composite, and a red mud plus calcium oxide blend. The results were striking. Every red mud formulation set faster than the reference, and all of them delivered higher compressive strength at three days, exceeding the control by 8 to 15 percent on average. At 28 days, the strengths converged to comparable values, meaning the waste-based binders matched conventional LC3 where it matters most for structural design. The best performers were the composite systems, BRM10-FA20 and BRM20-FA10, which paired red mud with fly ash, itself a coal-combustion waste rich in silica and alumina.</p>
<p>The reason for that synergy lies in a chemical handshake between the two wastes. Red mud&#8217;s alkalinity, driven by its 12.93 percent sodium oxide content, attacks the glassy silico-aluminate network of fly ash, depolymerizing it and releasing silicate and aluminate ions into the pore solution. Those ions then react with calcium from cement hydration to form additional C-(A)-S-H gel, the amorphous glue that gives concrete its strength, along with aluminum-bearing phases. X-ray diffraction confirmed that all the red mud systems produced the same essential hydration products as the reference cement: ettringite, portlandite, and calcite. Thermogravimetric analysis showed more pronounced mass loss in the low-temperature range for the red mud-fly ash blends, a signature of abundant gel formation that fills pores and densifies the matrix. Mercury intrusion porosimetry backed this up, revealing that the composite systems shifted from the reference&#8217;s bimodal pore distribution to a tighter, unimodal one with lower cumulative pore volume.</p>
<p>Not every additive helped. The blend containing 10 percent calcium oxide set dramatically fast, in just 90 minutes, and posted the strongest early strength, but its 28-day strength fell to 30.4 megapascals, below the reference. The researchers traced the failure to three mechanisms: the slaking of quicklime consumed mix water needed for later clinker hydration; a dense portlandite coating passivated the red mud particles, blocking dissolution of their aluminosilicates; and the surplus calcium hydroxide carbonated rapidly to calcium carbonate rather than feeding useful pozzolanic reactions. From this, they derived a practical design rule: the ratio of available calcium oxide to the sum of reactive silica and alumina should stay at or below 0.6. Exceed it, and the extra calcium becomes a liability rather than an asset.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential finding concerns safety. Red mud carries heavy metals, including chromium, arsenic, and molybdenum, and any construction use must guarantee they stay locked in place. Using the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure on 28-day cured samples, the team found that every monitored element leached at concentrations orders of magnitude below both Chinese GB 5085.3-2007 limits and US EPA reference thresholds. In the highest red mud mix, leachable chromium measured just 0.0167 milligrams per liter against a 15 milligram per liter benchmark, and lead registered 0.00119 milligrams per liter against a limit of 5. The researchers attribute this immobilization to three mechanisms working in concert: physical encapsulation within dense C-(A)-S-H gel and interlocking ettringite needles, chemical adsorption and hydroxide precipitation in the highly alkaline pore fluid, and isomorphous substitution, in which metal ions such as chromium take the crystallographic places of aluminum in ettringite and AFm lattices.</p>
<p>The implications ripple outward in several directions at once. For the aluminum industry, the study points toward a disposal pathway that consumes red mud at meaningful volumes rather than the token percentages achieved when it merely replaces a few percent of cement. For the cement industry, it removes a raw material bottleneck, since red mud is abundant, geographically widespread near smelters, and requires no calcination energy. And for the climate, combining two industrial wastes in a binder that already halves clinker demand compounds the emissions savings. The authors are careful to note the limits of their work: the fly ash contribution has not yet been isolated with a dedicated control, the long-term stability of ettringite under elevated service temperatures remains to be verified, and the proposed chromium substitution mechanism still needs confirmation by spectroscopic speciation. But the core demonstration stands. A sludge that has accumulated for over a century as aluminum&#8217;s dirty secret can be ground, mixed, and poured into the very infrastructure that must now be built sustainably, hardening into a material that is simultaneously a building block and a vault for its own toxic cargo.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Using Bayer red mud as a calcined clay substitute in limestone calcined clay cement</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Utilization of bayer red mud as a clay substitute in limestone-calcined clay cement (LC 3 )</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Gu, H., Zhang, Z., Wang, R., Zhang, Z., Meng, Z., &amp; Wang, J. (2026). Utilization of bayer red mud as a clay substitute in limestone-calcined clay cement (LC3). <em>Case Studies in Construction Materials, 25</em>, Article e06570. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06570" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06570</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06570" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06570</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Bayer red mud, limestone calcined clay cement, LC3, low-carbon cement, fly ash, pozzolanic reaction, heavy metal leaching, compressive strength, calcium oxide, industrial waste valorization, sustainable construction, hydration products</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">218134</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
