<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>lattice contraction &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/lattice-contraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:34:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Quenching Route Decides Whether Iron-Cobalt Alloy Bends or Breaks During Hot Rolling</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/quenching-route-decides-whether-iron-cobalt-alloy-bends-or-breaks-during-hot-rolling/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Sanderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 22:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alloy brittleness and ductility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alloy processing and deformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alloy quenching effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomic arrangement impact on mechanical behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deformation texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[density functional theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dislocation density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ductility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FeCo alloy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-principles calculations in alloy research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grain boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot rolling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of quenching methods on alloy strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iron-cobalt alloy hot rolling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lattice contraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic alloy applications in motors and transformers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic properties of Fe50Co50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[material fracture mechanisms in magnetic alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microstructural analysis of magnetic alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiscale modeling of alloy behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quenching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soft magnetic materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stacking fault energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tensile strength]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=250181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new Journal of Materials Science study shows that the quenching route chosen before hot rolling determines the lattice distortion, dislocation structure, and ultimately the strength and ductility of equiatomic Fe50Co50 alloy.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iron-cobalt alloys sit at the top of the soft magnetic materials table, offering the highest saturation magnetization of any known engineering alloy. That makes them irresistible to designers of motors, transformers, and power transmission equipment, where every extra tesla of magnetization translates into smaller, lighter, and more efficient machines. Yet the same atomic arrangement that gives the equiatomic Fe50Co50 alloy its magnetic superpowers also makes it notoriously brittle at room temperature, and the material has long frustrated manufacturers who need to roll, forge, or draw it into useful shapes without cracking it apart.</p>
<p>A new study published in the Journal of Materials Science by Xintong Zhang, Wei Sun, and colleagues at the University of Science and Technology Beijing, working with Ling Cheng of the China Electric Power Research Institute, has now traced exactly how the way a Fe50Co50 alloy is quenched before hot rolling determines whether the finished sheet emerges strong and ductile or weak and fracture-prone. The work combines microstructural characterization, first-principles calculations, uniaxial tensile testing, and actual rolling deformation into a single multiscale picture, connecting what happens at the level of individual atomic planes to the macroscopic behavior of a rolled plate.</p>
<p>The team prepared specimens using two different quenching routes, labeled HOQ and HWQ, and then examined the room temperature lattice and microstructural states of each before any hot rolling took place. The differences were subtle but consequential. Compared with the HOQ condition, the HWQ specimens showed an apparent relative lattice contraction of approximately 0.46 percent, a tiny squeeze of the crystal lattice that turned out to ripple through every subsequent stage of processing. Beyond the lattice itself, the two conditions also differed in grain structure, crystallographic orientation, the density of geometrically necessary dislocations, and the character of their grain boundaries.</p>
<p>To understand why such a small lattice change could matter, the researchers turned to density functional theory calculations, a quantum mechanical method that models the behavior of electrons in a crystal from first principles. They focused on the generalized stacking fault energy, or GSFE, a quantity that describes the energetic cost of sliding one block of atoms past another along a specific crystallographic plane. Stacking fault energies govern how easily dislocations, the line defects that carry plastic deformation, can move through a metal, and they therefore sit at the heart of any theory of ductility.</p>
<p>The calculations revealed a clear trend. In the undistorted model of the B2 FeCo lattice, the maximum GSFE along the selected slip pathway was 0.898 joules per square meter. When the experimentally measured 0.46 percent lattice contraction was applied to the computational cell, the maximum GSFE rose to 0.926 joules per square meter. Pushing the contraction to an exaggerated 10 percent drove the value up to 1.067 joules per square meter. In other words, squeezing the lattice makes it energetically harder for slip to proceed, which is precisely the kind of change that would be expected to embrittle the material. The authors are careful to note, however, that these DFT results illuminate slip energetics at the atomic scale and are not intended to directly represent dislocation behavior during the high temperature, high strain environment of hot rolling.</p>
<p>With the starting microstructures characterized and the atomic scale energetics mapped, the team subjected both quenched conditions to hot rolling and compared what came out the other side. The differences were striking. The HOQ-HR condition, meaning the HOQ-quenched alloy after hot rolling, exhibited a weaker deformation texture, meaning its grains were less strongly aligned into preferred orientations by the rolling process. It also retained a higher fraction of high angle grain boundaries, showed less pronounced local dislocation entanglement, and, critically, demonstrated better resistance to the cracking that rolling deformation tends to induce. The HWQ-HR condition told the opposite story, with a stronger deformation texture and far more extensive dislocation entanglement woven through its microstructure.</p>
<p>Deformation texture and dislocation entanglement are not merely cosmetic features. A strong texture means that most grains share a common crystallographic alignment, which can concentrate deformation along specific planes and directions and create paths for crack propagation. Dense dislocation entanglement, meanwhile, locks up the mobile dislocations that a metal needs in order to flow plastically, raising the local stress required for further deformation and encouraging cracks to nucleate instead. The microstructural evidence therefore painted a consistent picture: the HOQ route left the alloy in a state that could accommodate rolling deformation gracefully, while the HWQ route left it primed to accumulate damage.</p>
<p>Room temperature tensile tests confirmed the story quantitatively. The HWQ-HR specimens achieved an average ultimate tensile strength of 500.1 megapascals, with a standard deviation of 24.41 megapascals, but managed an elongation after fracture of only 4.6 percent, plus or minus 1.1 percent. The HOQ-HR specimens were in a different league altogether, reaching an average ultimate tensile strength of 725.4 megapascals with a remarkably tight standard deviation of 5.62 megapascals, while still stretching 19.3 percent, plus or minus 1.21 percent, before breaking. That combination of roughly 45 percent higher strength and more than four times the ductility represents a decisively more favorable strength-ductility balance for the HOQ-HR condition.</p>
<p>For a material class whose brittleness has historically limited its adoption, these numbers carry real industrial weight. Equiatomic FeCo and related Fe-Co-V alloys are prized for soft magnetic applications ranging from high performance electric motors to aerospace power systems, and prior research has explored routes as varied as heat treatment optimization and additive manufacturing to coax ductility out of them. The new work adds a deceptively simple lever to that toolkit: the quenching route chosen before hot deformation, which sets the lattice parameter, the dislocation density, and the grain boundary character that the alloy carries into the rolling mill.</p>
<p>What makes the study conceptually interesting beyond metallurgy is its multiscale architecture. Rather than treating the alloy as a black box, the researchers linked an experimentally measured lattice distortion to a computationally predicted change in slip energetics, and then connected both to observable microstructural evolution during rolling and finally to macroscopic tensile performance. Each link in that chain is independently verifiable, and together they demonstrate that a sub-percent lattice contraction, invisible to the naked eye, can cascade into a fourfold difference in ductility. As electrification drives demand for better soft magnetic alloys, understanding how processing history echoes from the atomic scale to the finished component may prove to be the difference between a material that cracks on the production line and one that rolls cleanly into the next generation of electric machines.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microstructural and atomic-scale effects of quenching conditions on the hot deformation behavior of equiatomic FeCo alloy</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Multiscale microstructural characteristics of quenched Fe50Co50 alloy and their effects on hot deformation behavior</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zhang, X., Sun, W., Xiao, X., Zhang, H., Zu, C., Li, X., Zhang, Z., Cheng, L., &amp; Wang, Z. (2026). Multiscale microstructural characteristics of quenched Fe50Co50 alloy and their effects on hot deformation behavior. <em>Journal of Materials Science</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13832-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13832-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13832-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10853-026-13832-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> FeCo alloy, quenching, hot rolling, lattice contraction, stacking fault energy, density functional theory, dislocation density, deformation texture, ductility, soft magnetic materials, grain boundaries, tensile strength</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">250181</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gold and Copper Nanoparticles Melt Differently: A Single Equation Explains Why</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/gold-and-copper-nanoparticles-melt-differently-a-single-equation-explains-why/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytical modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crystal lattice contraction in nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face-centered cubic metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lattice contraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mathematical modeling of nanoparticle melting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[melting-point depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metallic nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanofilms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanometer scale thermodynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle melting temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle research in nanotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticle shape and melting behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoscale material properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoscale thermodynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle shape effect on melting point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[size-dependent lattice spacing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[size-dependent melting of gold and copper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface atoms and nanoparticle stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface relaxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface-atom fraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface-to-volume ratio in nanomaterials]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=202628</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new analytical model predicts how size and shape jointly lower the melting temperatures and shrink the lattice parameters of gold and copper nanoparticles, matching experiments across spherical, cubic, tetrahedral, and film geometries.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shrink a piece of gold far enough and it stops behaving like the metal in your jewelry. At sizes measured in nanometers, gold and copper no longer melt at their familiar temperatures of 1,064 and 1,085 degrees Celsius. Instead, their melting points plunge, sometimes by hundreds of degrees, and the crystal lattice itself begins to squeeze inward. A new study published in the Journal of Nanoparticle Research offers a remarkably simple mathematical framework that captures both effects at once, predicting how melting temperature and lattice spacing depend not only on particle size but also on particle shape.</p>
<p>The work, carried out by Bijan Kumar Gangopadhyay, an independent researcher based in West Bengal, India, addresses a long-standing challenge in nanoscale thermodynamics. For decades, scientists have known that the properties of a material change dramatically when its dimensions shrink to the nanometer scale. The reason lies in simple arithmetic: as particles get smaller, an ever-larger fraction of their atoms sits on the surface rather than in the interior. Surface atoms are less tightly bound than their bulk counterparts because they have fewer neighbors, and this deficit of bonding partners destabilizes the crystal, allowing it to melt at lower temperatures and to contract under the pull of surface stress.</p>
<p>What has often been missing from earlier treatments, however, is a clean, explicit way to connect geometry to thermodynamics. Many existing models rely on average coordination numbers, empirical fitting parameters, or assumptions borrowed from macroscopic thermodynamics that become questionable at small sizes. The new model takes a different route. It begins with a direct, geometrical count of the fraction of atoms that reside on the surface of a nanoparticle of arbitrary shape, whether that particle is a sphere, a cube, a tetrahedron, or a thin film. From this surface-atom fraction, the model derives a relaxation factor that quantifies the effect of dangling bonds, the unsatisfied chemical bonds that terminate at any free surface.</p>
<p>The physical logic is straightforward. Every atom in the interior of a face-centered cubic metal such as gold or copper is surrounded by twelve nearest neighbors, giving it the full complement of bonding interactions that define the bulk cohesive energy. An atom on a flat surface, by contrast, may have only eight or nine neighbors, while an atom at a corner or edge of a faceted particle may have fewer still. These dangling bonds represent missing cohesive energy, and the more of them a particle has, relative to its total number of atoms, the more its average binding energy falls below the bulk value. Because melting occurs when thermal energy overcomes cohesive binding, a reduced average binding energy translates directly into a reduced melting temperature.</p>
<p>The same surface-atom fraction also governs the lattice parameter, the characteristic spacing between atoms in the crystal. Surface stress, arising from the imbalance of forces experienced by surface atoms, pulls the outer layers of the crystal inward, and this contraction propagates into the interior. Experimental measurements dating back to classic electron-diffraction studies of gold in the late 1960s and of copper and platinum in the early 1970s have confirmed that nanoscale metallic particles do indeed have smaller lattice constants than bulk crystals, with the deviation growing as particle size shrinks. The new analytical model reproduces this behavior by linking the relaxation factor, which describes how surface atoms adjust their positions and bonding, to the same geometric quantity that controls melting.</p>
<p>Applying the framework to gold and copper nanoparticles across a wide range of sizes, the study finds good agreement with available experimental measurements of both melting temperature and lattice parameter. The comparison covers spherical particles, cubes, tetrahedra, and nanofilms, demonstrating that a single set of analytical expressions can handle geometries that differ radically in their surface-to-volume ratios. A thin film, with two dominant surfaces and a thickness of only a few nanometers, has a far larger fraction of surface atoms than a sphere of comparable characteristic dimension, and the model captures the consequences: stronger melting-point depression and more pronounced lattice contraction.</p>
<p>One of the study&#8217;s clearest findings concerns what the author calls the shape factor. As the shape factor increases, reflecting a geometry with a larger surface-to-volume ratio, both melting-point depression and lattice contraction intensify. This provides a practical design rule for experimentalists: if you want to tune the thermal behavior of a metallic nanostructure, changing its shape can be as consequential as changing its size. A tetrahedral particle and a spherical particle containing the same number of atoms will not melt at the same temperature, because their surface atoms carry different weights in the overall energy balance.</p>
<p>The implications extend beyond gold and copper. The model is formulated for face-centered cubic metals in general, and its analytical simplicity means it can be evaluated with pencil and paper rather than computationally expensive simulations. Molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo approaches remain indispensable for capturing the full atomistic detail of nanoscale systems, including surface reconstructions, facet-specific chemistry, and thermal fluctuations, but they are costly and often difficult to interpret. An analytical expression that captures the leading-size and shape effects gives researchers a fast screening tool and a physical baseline against which simulations and experiments can be compared. The author suggests the framework could be extended to other thermodynamic properties of metallic nanomaterials, such as Debye temperature, specific heat, and thermal expansion, which previous studies have shown follow related size-dependent trends.</p>
<p>The scientific pedigree of the problem is long. Researchers have proposed liquid-drop models, coordination-number models, and various semi-empirical relations to explain melting-point depression since the phenomenon was first systematically studied. What distinguishes the present contribution is its explicit geometrical foundation: rather than treating the surface-atom fraction as an adjustable parameter, the model computes it directly from particle shape, and then ties it transparently to the physics of dangling bonds. This makes the model physically transparent in a way that purely fitted formulas are not, and it explains why different shapes produce different depressions of the melting point without requiring shape-specific calibration.</p>
<p>For technologists, the stakes are real. Gold nanoparticles are workhorses of catalysis, plasmonics, biomedical imaging, and drug delivery, and copper nanoparticles are increasingly important in electronics, antimicrobial coatings, and thermal interface materials. In all of these applications, the particles are processed, annealed, and operated at temperatures where their reduced melting points matter. Sintering, coalescence, and shape changes during manufacturing are governed by the same surface thermodynamics that the new model describes. A reliable analytical prediction of when a given nanoparticle will begin to soften and rearrange could help engineers choose processing windows that preserve the carefully engineered shapes on which device performance depends. Conversely, controlled melting could be exploited to fuse particles into desired architectures. As nanomaterials continue to move from laboratory curiosities to manufactured components, compact predictive tools of this kind are likely to become standard equipment in the nanoscale designer&#8217;s toolkit.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Size- and shape-dependent melting temperature and lattice parameter behavior of gold and copper metallic nanoparticles</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Unified analytical model for size- and shape-dependent melting temperature and lattice parameter of gold and copper nanoparticles</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Gangopadhyay, B. K. (2026). Unified analytical model for size- and shape-dependent melting temperature and lattice parameter of gold and copper nanoparticles. <em>Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 28</em>(10), Article 249. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-026-06770-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-026-06770-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-026-06770-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11051-026-06770-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> metallic nanoparticles, melting-point depression, lattice contraction, surface-atom fraction, surface relaxation, gold nanoparticles, copper nanoparticles, nanoscale thermodynamics, analytical modeling, face-centered cubic metals, nanofilms, surface stress</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">202628</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
