<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>larval survival &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/larval-survival/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:21:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Simple Sugar Dextrose Emerges as Best Carbon Source for Zero-Exchange Shrimp Hatcheries</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/simple-sugar-dextrose-emerges-as-best-carbon-source-for-zero-exchange-shrimp-hatcheries/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquaculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquaculture nutrition and larval survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofloc system optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofloc technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biofloc technology in aquaculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbohydrate sources for aquaculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon-nitrogen ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dextrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dextrose as carbon source in aquaculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global shrimp production and challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hatchery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of simple sugars on shrimp development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving shrimp hatchery outcomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian shrimp aquaculture growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larval survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific white shrimp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penaeus vannamei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shrimp hatchery biofloc systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable aquaculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable shrimp farming practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero water exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero-exchange shrimp larvae survival]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=235302</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Indian researchers found that dextrose outperformed fructose and lactose as a carbon source in zero-exchange biofloc hatchery systems, boosting Pacific white shrimp larval survival to over 90 percent.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quiet revolution is unfolding in the tanks where the world&#8217;s shrimp begin their lives. Researchers at Acharya Nagarjuna University in Andhra Pradesh, India, have shown that the choice of an ordinary kitchen-chemistry ingredient—a simple sugar—can dramatically improve the survival of Pacific white shrimp larvae raised in water that is never exchanged. In a study published in the journal Blue Biotechnology, Kola Suneetha, P. Padmavathi, and Darwin Chatla compared three carbohydrate sources in a biofloc system and found that dextrose, a glucose sugar derived from simple starch, outperformed both fructose and lactose in keeping fragile young shrimp alive through the most vulnerable weeks of their development.</p>
<p>The stakes are considerable. Shrimp aquaculture has become one of the fastest-growing food production sectors on the planet, and India sits at its center. The country ranks third in global aquaculture output after China and Indonesia, accounting for 7.70 percent of world production, and its sector has posted double-digit annual growth exceeding 10 percent over the past decade. Yet the industry&#8217;s Achilles heel lies at the very start of the production line: hatcheries that supply healthy seed stock. Poor quality larvae during the initial stages constrain survival, growth, and ultimately the productivity of entire farming operations downstream.</p>
<p>Conventional shrimp hatcheries solve their water quality problems the old-fashioned way—by flushing. Large volumes of water are exchanged continuously to keep toxic nitrogenous wastes in check, a strategy that carries heavy costs in pumping, collection, filtration, and disinfection, while also creating pathways for disease and discharging nutrient-rich effluent into the environment. Biofloc technology, or BFT, offers a fundamentally different approach. Instead of removing nitrogenous waste, the system recruits communities of heterotrophic bacteria to convert it into microbial biomass. By manipulating the carbon-to-nitrogen ratio in the water, farmers encourage these bacteria to proliferate, forming dense suspended aggregates—the flocs—that shrimp can graze on as a natural, continuously available food source.</p>
<p>The catch is that bacteria need carbon to do this work, and not all carbon sources are created equal. Simple sugars such as molasses, glucose, and fructose are rapidly degraded, while complex materials like rice bran and cellulose break down slowly. The choice of carbohydrate shapes how quickly flocs form, how efficiently nutrients are assimilated, and how stable the microbial community remains. Despite the technology&#8217;s successful adoption across broodstock, nursery, and grow-out phases of shrimp production, information on its effectiveness during the delicate larval and postlarval stages of Penaeus vannamei has remained scarce—precisely the gap the Indian team set out to fill.</p>
<p>The experiment took place at the BKMN shrimp hatchery in Undavalli, in the Guntur district of Andhra Pradesh. The researchers used eight circular high-density polyethylene tanks of 1000 liters capacity, each with a working volume of 800 liters, meticulously cleaned and treated with bleaching powder before use. Specific pathogen-free shrimp nauplii, confirmed disease-free by PCR testing, were stocked at an extraordinarily high density of 100 larvae per liter—80,000 animals per tank—at the mysis-1 stage. Three biofloc treatments were established at a fixed carbon-to-nitrogen ratio of 15:1, using fructose, lactose, or dextrose as the carbon source, alongside a control with no carbohydrate addition. The trial ran for 13 days, until the larvae reached postlarval stage 10, with zero water exchange throughout.</p>
<p>Building the flocs required careful staging. Following the protocol pioneered by aquaculture researcher Yoram Avnimelech, the team introduced nitrogen on the first day by adding 1.5 grams of ammonium chloride, then added carbon sources on days three and five at 5.62 grams, doubling the dose to 11.25 grams on day seven. The water&#8217;s transformation from clear and transparent to light brown signaled that floc formation was underway. Larvae were fed a commercial microencapsulated diet with a minimum protein content of 52 percent, distributed across six daily feedings, with quantities adjusted to floc volume at each developmental stage.</p>
<p>The water chemistry results told a clear story. Temperature remained in the optimal 27 to 29 degrees Celsius range, and dissolved oxygen stayed between 5.30 and 6.24 milligrams per liter, comfortably above the lethal threshold of 1.0 ppm reported for the species. More striking were the differences in nitrogen compounds. Total ammonia nitrogen in the biofloc tanks ranged from 0.69 to 0.78 milligrams per liter, significantly lower than the control&#8217;s 1.07. Un-ionized ammonia, which is highly toxic to shrimp, measured just 0.12 milligrams per liter in the biofloc treatments against 0.36 in the control. Nitrite, which damages the circulatory and immune systems of aquatic animals, was a mere 0.06 milligrams per liter in the biofloc systems compared with 1.53 in the control—well above the 1.0 milligram per liter considered optimal for successful culture. Nitrate and alkalinity also differed significantly among treatments, with biofloc alkalinity of roughly 127 to 128 milligrams per liter far exceeding the control&#8217;s 91.38.</p>
<p>Survival data sealed the case for dextrose. At postlarval stage 1, dextrose-fed tanks achieved 93 percent survival, followed by fructose at 88.67 percent, lactose at 86.33 percent, and the control at 79.33 percent. By postlarval stages 5 and 10, the gap widened: 90.67 percent for dextrose, 85.67 percent for fructose, 78.33 percent for lactose, and a sobering 66.67 percent for the control. The researchers attribute dextrose&#8217;s advantage to its chemistry. As a monosaccharide derived from simple starch, it is readily broken down by bacteria, driving robust floc formation—the dextrose treatment produced the greatest floc volume at 1.62 milliliters per liter, compared with 1.12 for fructose and just 0.84 for lactose, a disaccharide that microbes decompose more slowly.</p>
<p>The broader implications extend beyond a single hatchery in coastal India. Every biofloc treatment group surpassed the 70 percent survival benchmark considered appropriate for the species and for experimental hatcheries, and the overall biofloc survival range of 71 to 86 percent dwarfed the control&#8217;s 53 percent. Because the systems operated with zero water exchange, they promise reduced water costs, enhanced biosecurity against pathogens, and a smaller environmental footprint—attributes that matter enormously as the industry confronts disease outbreaks and tightening environmental regulations. The flocs themselves add nutritional value, offering shrimp a supplementary microbial food source alongside formulated feeds.</p>
<p>For an industry that contributes roughly 1.24 percent to India&#8217;s gross value added and more than 7.28 percent to agricultural GVA, with exports of 12.22 million tonnes valued at 1.42 billion US dollars in 2023, even incremental gains in hatchery survival compound into substantial economic returns. The study&#8217;s conclusion is pragmatic: fertilization with dextrose at a 15:1 carbon-to-nitrogen ratio can efficiently maintain a shrimp hatchery system without any water exchange. As biofloc technology continues its march from experimental tanks to commercial operations worldwide, this finding suggests that one of the most consequential decisions a hatchery manager makes may be as simple as choosing the right sugar.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Biofloc technology with different carbon sources for Pacific white shrimp hatchery production</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Hatchery performance of Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei in Biofloc technology by using different carbon sources</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Suneetha, K., Padmavathi, P., &amp; Chatla, D. (2024). Hatchery performance of Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei in Biofloc technology by using different carbon sources. <em>Blue Biotechnology, 1</em>(1), Article 13. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44315-024-00016-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s44315-024-00016-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44315-024-00016-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s44315-024-00016-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> biofloc technology, Pacific white shrimp, Penaeus vannamei, aquaculture, dextrose, carbon source, water quality, larval survival, hatchery, zero water exchange, carbon-nitrogen ratio, sustainable aquaculture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">235302</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dung Beetle Parents Keep Nests Moist and Recruit Helpful Bacteria to Save Their Young</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/dung-beetle-parents-keep-nests-moist-and-recruit-helpful-bacteria-to-save-their-young/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 22:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficial bacteria cultivation in dung beetles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brood ball moisture retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brood balls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canthon cyanellus cyanellus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation of dung beetle species in humid forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desiccation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dung beetle parental care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dung beetles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental factors affecting dung beetle development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insect parental care mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdisciplinary study of physics and microbiology in insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[larval survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maternal investment in insect offspring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metataxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial transfer in insect nesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbiology of dung beetle nests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relative humidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of physical environment in beetle larval survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsocial behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsocial behavior in insects]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=208507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research shows that parental care in the subsocial dung beetle Canthon cyanellus cyanellus preserves brood ball moisture and cultivates beneficial bacteria, both of which are essential for larval survival.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the humid forests of Mexico, a metallic blue-green dung beetle engages in a form of parental devotion that is rare among insects. The subsocial roller beetle <em>Canthon cyanellus cyanellus</em> constructs brood balls from carrion, buries them, and remains with its young as they develop. Scientists have long known that this care is essential for offspring survival, but the precise mechanisms behind its protective power have remained elusive. A new study published in <em>The Science of Nature</em> reveals that the answer lies in an unexpected combination of physics and microbiology: parental beetles keep their nurseries from drying out, and in doing so, they also cultivate a community of beneficial bacteria on the walls of the brood ball.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Daniel Antonio Ortega-Rosas of the Instituto de Ecología A.C. together with colleagues from the Instituto Politécnico Nacional, set out to test whether the benefits of parental care go beyond the microbial transfer from parents to brood balls that earlier studies had proposed. Their hypothesis was that the physical maintenance of the brood ball itself—the moisture it retains, its acidity, and its structural consistency—might be just as important as any microbial inheritance. To investigate, they designed a controlled experiment that manipulated both the presence of parents and the humidity of the surrounding environment, creating a factorial matrix of conditions under which brood balls and their developing larvae could be observed.</p>
<p>The experiment exposed brood balls, some tended by parents and some left alone, to four levels of relative humidity: 30 percent, 50 percent, 65 percent, and 70 percent. At each level, the researchers measured the gravimetric water content of the brood balls, their pH, and their hardness, while simultaneously tracking larval survival and developmental progress. The design allowed the team to disentangle the effects of parental behavior from those of ambient moisture, a distinction that previous work had not clearly established.</p>
<p>The results were striking. Parental care significantly contributed to maintaining both the moisture and the structural integrity of brood balls, but these benefits were strongly dependent on the ambient relative humidity. High humidity of at least 65 percent emerged as a critical threshold for larval survival and for progression to advanced developmental stages, and this was true regardless of whether parents were present. At the other end of the spectrum, when relative humidity dropped to 50 percent or below, larval mortality reached a devastating 100 percent, even when parents remained in attendance. In other words, parental care could not rescue offspring from an environment that was simply too dry.</p>
<p>This finding reframes our understanding of what parental care actually does for these beetles. Rather than acting primarily as a shield against fungal infection through microbial transfer, as had been suggested, the parents&#8217; most vital contribution appears to be preventing brood ball desiccation. A brood ball that retains its moisture preserves a crucial physical property: structural plasticity. The developing larva must be able to migrate through the ball to reach the food chamber where it feeds, and a hardened, dried-out ball turns this journey into an impassable obstacle. By keeping the ball pliable, parents ensure that their offspring can physically access the resources they need to grow.</p>
<p>Beyond moisture, the researchers found that parental care produced a slightly more alkaline pH in the brood balls across most treatments. While this shift might seem subtle, pH is a fundamental driver of microbial ecology, and the change appeared to be associated with measurable differences in the bacterial communities colonizing the brood ball surface. To characterize these communities, the team employed metataxonomic analysis of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene, sequencing the V3–V4 region to identify the bacteria present under each experimental condition.</p>
<p>The microbiome results added a rich new dimension to the story. Parental care significantly influenced the bacterial assemblage on the brood ball surface, increasing alpha diversity and favoring genera associated with organic matter degradation and antimicrobial activity. Among the genera enriched in the presence of parents were <em>Nocardioides</em>, known for its ability to break down complex pollutants; <em>Bacillus</em>, a genus famous for producing antimicrobial compounds; and <em>Nannocystis</em>, a myxobacterium with documented bioactivity. These taxa suggest that caring parents are not merely keeping their nests damp but are actively cultivating a microbial community that may help suppress harmful fungi and accelerate the decomposition processes that make the brood ball&#8217;s contents digestible for the larva.</p>
<p>Equally intriguing was the discovery of a bacterial core shared across all brood balls regardless of treatment. Eight genera, including <em>Acinetobacter</em>, <em>Sphingobacterium</em>, and <em>Micromonospora</em>, were consistently present, forming a baseline microbiome that appears to be a stable feature of the brood ball environment. The presence of <em>Micromonospora</em> is particularly noteworthy, as members of this genus are renowned producers of bioactive natural products and have been isolated from diverse insect systems, where they may contribute to host defense. The combination of a consistent core community with parentally enhanced diversity suggests a layered system: a foundational microbiome that comes with the brood ball, overlaid by parental modifications that tip the ecological balance toward microbes beneficial to offspring.</p>
<p>The implications of this work extend beyond the biology of a single beetle species. Dung beetles and their necrophagous relatives are keystone decomposers in tropical ecosystems, responsible for nutrient cycling, soil aeration, and secondary seed dispersal. <em>Canthon cyanellus cyanellus</em>, as a subsocial species that invests heavily in each brood ball, may be especially vulnerable to environmental perturbations that disrupt its delicate reproductive calculus. The study&#8217;s authors point out that shifts toward drier conditions, whether driven by climate change or deforestation, could significantly compromise the reproductive success of this species. If ambient humidity falls below the critical threshold of roughly 65 percent, no amount of parental diligence can save the brood, meaning that habitat drying translates directly into reproductive failure.</p>
<p>This research also speaks to a broader question in evolutionary biology: why has subsocial behavior, in which parents remain with offspring long after egg-laying, evolved repeatedly in scarabaeine beetles? The answer emerging from this study is that parental care in these insects functions through multiple synergistic channels. It is at once a hydraulic engineering project, maintaining the moisture that keeps the nursery habitable; a microbiological stewardship program, enriching the bacterial community with degradative and antimicrobial taxa; and a modest chemical intervention, shifting brood ball pH toward conditions that may favor beneficial microbes. The convergence of these mechanisms explains why parental presence so dramatically improves offspring outcomes under suitable humidity, and why it becomes powerless when the environment itself turns hostile. As tropical forests warm and dry, understanding these finely tuned dependencies becomes essential for predicting which species will persist and which will quietly disappear, one failed brood ball at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Parental care effects on brood ball physicochemical properties and bacterial communities in the subsocial dung beetle Canthon cyanellus cyanellus</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Parental care in Canthon cyanellus cyanellus maintains brood ball moisture and shapes bacterial communities: implications for offspring survival</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Parental care in Canthon cyanellus cyanellus maintains brood ball moisture and shapes bacterial communities: implications for offspring survival. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-026-02160-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-026-02160-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-026-02160-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00114-026-02160-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Canthon cyanellus cyanellus, parental care, brood balls, relative humidity, larval survival, bacterial communities, metataxonomy, dung beetles, subsocial behavior, microbiome, desiccation, climate change</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">208507</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
