The research, led by Krishna Murthy Rangaiah of the All India Coordinated Research Project on Soil Test Crop Response at the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, was conducted between 2023 and 2025 under the Soil Test Crop Response, or STCR, framework. This approach, long championed by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, rests on a simple but powerful idea: the amount of fertilizer a crop needs is not a fixed number but a function of the yield the farmer wants and the nutrients the soil can already supply. By quantifying how much of each nutrient comes from the soil, from fertilizer, and from organic amendments such as farmyard manure, the method converts a routine soil test into a tailored fertilizer prescription.

Field bean, Lablab purpureus, is a multipurpose legume of enormous importance in the Eastern Dry Zone, valued for grain, fodder and green manure, and prized for its tolerance of the region’s erratic rainfall. Yet its productivity has remained stubbornly sub-optimal, in part because existing recommendations ignore the wide variation in soil fertility from farm to farm. The Alfisols that dominate the zone are inherently variable, weathered soils whose nutrient-supplying capacity can differ dramatically even between adjacent fields, making them an ideal test case for site-specific nutrient management.

The study unfolded in three carefully sequenced phases. First, the team established a fertility gradient experiment using fodder maize as an exhaustive crop. By applying differential doses of nutrients and organic matter across a single field, they created three distinct fertility strips: low, medium and high, each with measurably different levels of available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium. This artificial gradient is the statistical engine of the STCR method, because it generates the wide range of soil-test values and crop responses needed to fit reliable equations on a manageable plot of land.

With the gradient in place, the researchers moved to the second phase: a main calibration experiment with field bean. Across the three fertility strips, they applied a factorial combination of fertilizer levels and farmyard manure, then measured both seed yield and the total uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in the harvested crop. From these paired observations they derived the core parameters of the targeted-yield equations: the nutrient requirement, expressed in kilograms of nutrient per quintal of grain; the contribution of soil nutrients to yield; the contribution of applied fertilizer; and, in the integrated treatment, the additional contribution of farmyard manure. Separate equations were fitted for the NPK-only system and for the NPK plus farmyard manure system, allowing the organic amendment to be priced into the prescription.

The mathematics behind these equations is straightforward once the parameters are known. For a chosen yield target, the required fertilizer dose equals the nutrient requirement multiplied by the target, minus the product of the soil test value and the soil contribution coefficient, minus the manure contribution where applicable. In practice, this means a farmer with a phosphorus-rich soil test value receives a smaller phosphorus recommendation than a neighbor with depleted soils, even when both aim for the same harvest. It is a level of precision that blanket recommendations, by design, cannot achieve.

The third phase put the equations to the test in validation trials at two locations, where STCR-based prescriptions were compared head-to-head with the general recommended dose of fertilizer and with the soil fertility-rating approach, a coarser method that adjusts recommendations only by broad fertility classes. The results were striking. Treatments targeting a yield of 12 quintals per hectare under the integrated NPK plus farmyard manure system delivered the highest seed yields of the entire study, reaching 13.42 and 13.21 quintals per hectare at the two validation sites. That performance exceeded the general recommended dose by 20.2 to 23.7 percent and the soil fertility-rating approach by 35.1 to 38.8 percent.

There is an honest caveat in the data that the authors themselves flag. Observed yields under the four STCR treatments overshot their specified targets by 7.8 to 17.6 percent, indicating positive prediction errors rather than the uniform agreement within plus or minus ten percent that a perfectly calibrated model would show. In other words, the equations lean generous, prescribing slightly more nutrients than strictly necessary to hit a target. For farmers, this bias is arguably the safer direction, since under-fertilizing a legume crop risks forfeiting yield, but the overshoot suggests the equations may warrant refinement as more validation data accumulate.

One of the study’s most economically significant findings concerns farmyard manure, a resource many smallholders in the region already possess. Integrating FYM into the nutrient budget reduced the calculated fertilizer requirements for nitrogen, phosphorus pentoxide and potassium oxide by roughly 8 to 15 percent at comparable soil-test levels. The organic amendment did more than substitute for purchased fertilizer; it also improved the efficiency with which the crop used applied nutrients. Apparent recovery of potassium, a measure of how much of the applied nutrient ends up in the harvested plant, climbed to 2.74 to 2.81 kilograms per kilogram under the integrated system, compared with 1.82 to 1.89 kilograms per kilogram under fertilizer alone. Agronomic efficiency followed the same pattern, reinforcing the case for combining organic and inorganic sources rather than treating them as substitutes.

The implications extend well beyond a single crop or district. India’s fertilizer subsidy bill is enormous, and nutrients applied without reference to soil status are simultaneously a fiscal drain and an environmental hazard, contributing to nitrate leaching and phosphorus runoff. Equations of the kind validated here, which are crop-specific and soil-specific by construction, offer a pathway to site-specific nutrient management that a soil testing laboratory can operationalize with routine analyses. For the Eastern Dry Zone, where Alfisols are marginal and rainfall unreliable, squeezing an extra fifth of the harvest from the same fertilizer investment could meaningfully change the economics of legume farming. The study, funded by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research under grant CRP-18 and conducted with collaborators from the ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil Science in Bhopal and the ICAR-Agricultural Technology Application Research Institute in Kolkata, establishes a replicable template: build a fertility gradient, calibrate against yield and uptake, validate in farmers’ conditions, and hand the resulting equations to the soil testing laboratories that serve the fields. If similar calibrations are extended to the region’s other crops, the era of the blanket recommendation may finally be drawing to a close.

Subject of Research: Soil test crop response-based targeted yield fertilizer prescription for field bean on Alfisols in Karnataka

Article Title: Development and validation of STCR-based fertilizer prescription equations for field bean under Alfisol conditions of the Eastern Dry Zone of Karnataka

Article References: Rangaiah, K. M., Nagendrachari, A. N., Nanjundappa, S. M., Kasturappa, G., Nagaraju, B., Krishna, P., Srivastava, S., Haokip, I. C., & Dey, P. (2026). Development and validation of STCR-based fertilizer prescription equations for field bean under Alfisol conditions of the Eastern Dry Zone of Karnataka. BMC Plant Biology. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09986-6

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12870-026-09986-6

Keywords: field bean, STCR, targeted yield, fertilizer prescription, Alfisols, Eastern Dry Zone, Karnataka, soil fertility, integrated nutrient management, farmyard manure, nutrient use efficiency, site-specific nutrient management

The research, published in the journal Environmental Geochemistry and Health, was conducted by a team from PES College of Engineering in Mandya, ATME College of Engineering in Mysuru and Visvesvaraya Technological University in Belagavi. The researchers collected soil samples from twenty-one quarry sites scattered across the district, a region whose geology is dominated by granitic terrain. Granite is chemically notorious among radiation scientists: it tends to be enriched in the minerals that carry uranium-series and thorium-series isotopes as well as potassium-40, so soils weathered from granitic bedrock typically register activity concentrations well above the global averages for ordinary soils. This geological signature is precisely what the team’s measurements captured.

Quantifying trace radioactivity requires a sensitive analytical instrument, and the study relied on high-purity germanium (HPGe) gamma-ray spectrometry, the workhorse technique of environmental radiometry. HPGe detectors, when cryogenically cooled, resolve the characteristic gamma-ray energies emitted by each decay chain with exquisite precision, allowing researchers to identify individual radionuclides within a mixed sample. By measuring the intensity of gamma lines characteristic of radium-226, thorium-232 and potassium-40, the team computed the activity concentrations of each isotope in becquerels per kilogram — a measure of how many atomic disintegrations occur per second in each kilogram of soil. The mean values they reported were 39.5 Bq/kg for radium-226, 81.5 Bq/kg for thorium-232 and 656 Bq/kg for potassium-40, confirming the influence of the granitic geology, particularly the elevated thorium and potassium content.

These individual numbers become far more informative when combined into composite indices that radiation protection agencies have designed to summarise risk. The researchers calculated the radium equivalent activity, Ra_eq, which weights the three radionuclides according to their respective gamma contributions; it averaged 206.5 Bq/kg, below the widely used ceiling of 370 Bq/kg associated with a dose of 1 mSv per year. They also computed the gamma radiation representative index (Iγr), the external hazard index (Hex) and the internal hazard index (Hin), which came out at averages of 1.52, 0.56 and 0.66 respectively. The two hazard indices both sit below unity, the conventional threshold indicating that the materials would pose no unacceptable radiological risk if used in construction, either outdoors where exposure is external or indoors where radon inhalation and gamma irradiation combine.

The ratios between the three radionuclides tell their own geological story. The team reported average activity concentration ratios of 2.05 for thorium-232 to radium-226, 16.65 for potassium-40 to radium-226 and 8.15 for potassium-40 to thorium-232. A thorium-to-radium ratio above two is characteristic of soils derived from rocks in which thorium-bearing minerals such as monazite accumulate preferentially, a hallmark of many Indian granitic terrains. Such ratios serve as fingerprints that connect surface soil measurements to the deeper petrology of the region, and they help distinguish natural geological enrichment from any anthropogenic contamination, which was not indicated at these sites.

Laboratory spectrometry alone does not capture the full radiological picture, because real-world exposure happens in situ, under open skies and variable conditions. To complement the sample analysis, the team deployed a calibrated ER-709 portable dosimeter at the quarry locations to measure ambient gamma radiation directly. The instrument recorded an average absorbed gamma dose rate of 89.06 nanogray per hour. Converting this absorbed dose into a quantity that health physicists can compare against international exposure standards yields an annual effective dose of approximately 0.11 millisieverts per year — a figure far below the roughly 2.4 millisieverts per year that every human being receives on average from all natural sources, including cosmic rays, food and inhaled radon.

From the dose measurements the researchers extrapolated two widely used risk metrics. The excess lifetime cancer risk, a statistical estimate of the additional lifetime cancer probability attributable to the measured exposure, averaged 0.38 × 10⁻³, meaning an additional cancer risk of roughly one in twenty-six hundred — within the range that international bodies such as the World Health Organization and the International Commission on Radiological Protection consider acceptable for natural background exposure. The team also estimated an annual gonadal dose equivalent of 671.22 microsieverts per year, a quantity relevant to hereditary effects because gonadal tissues are among the most radiation-sensitive in the body. Again, this value remained within the range documented for ordinary terrestrial environments worldwide and did not approach levels of concern.

The findings carry practical significance beyond academic interest. India’s construction industry consumes enormous quantities of crushed granite aggregate, dimension stone and quarry dust, and regulators must decide whether quarry-derived materials can be used safely in dwellings, schools and infrastructure. The study’s hazard indices below unity provide direct evidence that, for the sites examined in Mandya district, these materials do not exceed radiological constraints for building use. Equally important, the work establishes a baseline: because natural radioactivity varies with geology, long-term monitoring programmes need reference data to detect future changes, whether caused by new excavation, land-use shifts or industrial inputs. The authors emphasise that the dataset provides exactly such a foundation for future soil radioactivity monitoring and radiological assessments in the region.

The Mandya results also sit within a growing body of Indian and international literature on naturally occurring radioactive materials. Comparable surveys of granite quarries in the Bangalore rural district of Karnataka, of soils in neighbouring districts and of quarry sites in states such as Tamil Nadu, Punjab and Kerala have documented similar patterns of granitic enrichment, with regional variations driven by local mineralogy. Globally, studies from Egypt, Turkey, Brazil, Bangladesh, Nigeria and China have applied the same battery of indices — Ra_eq, Hex, Hin, Iγr and excess lifetime cancer risk — to quarry soils, building stones and beach sands, creating a common framework for comparing radiological safety across continents. Against that backdrop, Mandya’s quarry soils emerge as geologically distinctive but radiologically unremarkable.

For the workers and residents of Mandya district, the practical message of the study is one of reassurance grounded in careful measurement rather than assumption. Natural radioactivity is inescapable — it emanates from the bedrock beneath our feet, the minerals in our building materials and even the potassium in our own cells — and the relevant question is always whether local levels exceed the thresholds that decades of radiobiological research have established. In this corner of southern India, where ancient granites meet one of the world’s busiest quarrying economies, the answer is a measured no. The radiation written into the stone is real, quantifiable and now well documented, but it remains a modest contributor to the background radiation that all life on Earth has always lived with.

Subject of Research: Assessment of natural radioactivity from radium-226, thorium-232 and potassium-40 in quarry soils of Mandya district, Karnataka, India

Article Title: Assessment of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K in soil with gamma dose rates from quarries of the Mandya district, Karnataka, India

Article References: Nagaraju, R. M., Siddaiah, S. T., Dudda, C., Halligudra, G., & Jayaram, A. K. (2026). Assessment of 226Ra, 232Th and 40K in soil with gamma dose rates from quarries of the Mandya district, Karnataka, India. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 48(15), Article 598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-026-03470-8

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s10653-026-03470-8

Keywords: natural radioactivity, radium-226, thorium-232, potassium-40, gamma-ray spectrometry, HPGe detector, quarry soils, granite, radiation dose, radiological hazard assessment, Karnataka, environmental radioactivity