The researchers, led by Kaneshiro et al., approached the topic with significant rigor, analyzing a range of parameters that contribute to the effectiveness and compassion of end-of-life care. Their study spans various hospitals and healthcare facilities, showcasing diverse patient experiences and providing a comprehensive look at how different training routes affect care delivery. By comparing IMGs and US Medical Graduates, the team aims to identify strengths and weaknesses inherent within both groups when caring for older adults at the end of life.

A key aspect of the study is the emphasis on the tailored approaches that healthcare providers bring to their patients. IMGs often possess unique experiences that influence their caregiving style, often shaped by the healthcare practices prevalent in their home countries. Consequently, these nuanced differences may present advantages in addressing the multicultural needs of patients, especially in diverse populations. Conversely, US-trained physicians typically have a more standardized exposure to the healthcare system, emphasizing protocols and guidelines that might not cater to individual patient needs as effectively.

The findings of this study are particularly timely, given the increasing demographic shift toward an aging population. This shift creates a pressing need for effective end-of-life care that resonates with the values, wishes, and cultural backgrounds of older adults. As healthcare systems evolve, understanding how different training backgrounds influence care delivery becomes paramount to improving patient outcomes. This research not only addresses how medical education shapes healthcare professionals but also raises questions about how to integrate various styles of care for the benefit of patients.

An intriguing component of the study included qualitative data from interviews with patients and families. Their feedback provided invaluable insights into what constitutes effective and compassionate care. The perceptions shared by these individuals highlighted the intimate relationship between healthcare providers and patients, stressing that the emotional and psychological dimensions of care often outweigh mere clinical measures. These poignant reflections align with the core values of patient-centered care, emphasizing the necessity for providers to foster genuine relationships with those they serve.

Moreover, the researchers sought to quantify the differences in the quality of care provided, utilizing several established metrics. By analyzing data from various hospitals, they were able to gauge outcomes such as pain management, communication effectiveness, and the overall patient experience at the end of life. These metrics provided a robust framework for assessing how each group of graduates performed and revealed areas where improvements could be made.

The study also delves into systemic challenges faced by healthcare providers. The pressures of time constraints, bureaucratic red tape, and the complexity of patient cases were common themes that emerged during discussions about care delivery. These factors often hinder even the most well-intentioned providers from delivering the empathic, individualized care that patients deserve. Understanding the environment in which healthcare professionals operate is vital for recognizing the barriers that may impact patient care.

Furthermore, there is a growing recognition within the medical community that education plays a dynamic role in shaping how providers approach end-of-life conversations. The study points out that many medical schools have begun to place greater emphasis on communication skills and palliative care training. However, the effectiveness of these programs largely depends on the ability of educators to equip students with the tools to navigate emotionally charged discussions with sensitivity and empathy.

The contributions of IMGs to the healthcare field may not always receive the acknowledgment they deserve. This research highlights not only the differences in training but also the rich, diverse perspectives that IMGs bring to the table. By incorporating various cultural understandings of health, illness, and death, they can significantly enhance the quality of care provided to diverse patient populations. As societies become increasingly multicultural, leveraging this diversity among healthcare providers could lead to more comprehensive and compassionate care strategies.

Ultimately, the study by Kaneshiro and colleagues underscores the complexity of end-of-life care and the numerous factors that influence patient outcomes. It serves as a call to action for healthcare policymakers, educators, and providers to re-evaluate how medical training programs equip future physicians to handle the nuanced challenges that arise in this sensitive area of practice. The lessons learned from this comparison between IMGs and US graduates could be instrumental in shaping a more holistic approach to patient care in the years to come.

As healthcare systems strive for improvement, insights such as those provided by this research will become even more invaluable. By addressing the unique contributions of all healthcare providers and understanding their differing impact on patient outcomes, we may move closer to achieving a more equitable and enriching experience for patients facing the complexities of end-of-life decisions. The study encourages a re-examination of how we value different educational paths in medicine and the potential they hold for enhancing patient care.

In a world marked by rapid technological advances and changing demographics, the findings from this research could prove influential in redefining standards for end-of-life care. With aging populations and increasingly complex health conditions, the demand for effective, empathetic care cannot be overstated. As we move forward, it will be critical to embrace the insights presented by this research to inform policy changes, educational curricula, and ultimately, patient care practices that honor the dignity of all individuals as they journey through their final days.

The conversation surrounding the roles of International Medical Graduates and US Medical Graduates will undoubtedly continue as we seek to create healthcare environments that are responsive to the needs of diverse populations. The implications of this study extend well beyond academia, urging stakeholders at every level to champion innovative practices that recognize and respect the individuality of each patient. It is through this lens of compassion and respect that we can hope to transform end-of-life care into a more humane and supportive experience for everyone involved.

In summary, the ongoing discourse regarding end-of-life care for older adults treated by different factions of medical graduates reminds us of our collective responsibility as caregivers. The lessons gleaned from the contrasting experiences of IMGs and US-trained physicians offer fertile ground for continued exploration, suggesting that a collaborative approach that taps into the strengths of both may yield the most beneficial outcomes for patients and families during some of the most difficult moments of their lives. The insights gained from this rigorous investigation provide a foundation for future research and implementation strategies that can enhance end-of-life care across the healthcare spectrum.

Subject of Research: End-of-Life Care Processes and Outcomes for Older Adults Treated by International Medical Graduates vs. US Medical Graduates

Article Title: End-of-Life Care Processes and Outcomes for Older Adults Treated by International Medical Graduates vs. US Medical Graduates

Article References:

Kaneshiro, G.S., Reuben, D.B., Zingmond, D.S. et al. End-of-Life Care Processes and Outcomes for Older Adults Treated by International Medical Graduates vs. US Medical Graduates.
J GEN INTERN MED (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-026-10175-2

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-026-10175-2

Keywords: End-of-life care, International Medical Graduates, US Medical Graduates, patient outcomes, healthcare disparities

An alarming trend has surfaced in recent years: as the rates of obesity continue to rise nationwide, high-risk veterans are experiencing disproportionately higher levels of obesity compared to the general population. The study highlights that a myriad of social risks—ranging from unemployment and housing instability to food insecurity—play a pivotal role in exacerbating obesity within this group. Such findings are particularly concerning given that obesity is linked to various physical and mental health problems, including diabetes, heart disease, and depression, which are already prevalent among veterans.

The research team, led by R. M. Kane, along with co-authors K. M. Stechuchak and L. Greene, adopted a comprehensive approach, examining both qualitative and quantitative data to provide a holistic picture of how social risks affect health outcomes. By incorporating interviews and surveys alongside clinical data, they were able to illustrate not just the statistical correlations but also the real-life narratives behind the numbers, giving voices to veterans whose struggles often go unnoticed in larger discussions about health and wellness.

From the findings, it became evident that social support—or the lack thereof—has a significant influence on obesity prevalence. Veterans without strong community ties or family support reported higher rates of sedentary behavior and unhealthy eating habits. Conversely, those who participated in community activities or had access to nutritional education displayed healthier behaviors. This highlights the need for enhanced community engagement and support networks as part of obesity prevention strategies tailored specifically for veterans.

Moreover, the authors noted that mental health challenges, often exacerbated by prior combat experiences or trauma, impact lifestyle choices that contribute to obesity. The stigma surrounding mental health issues in the veteran community may deter individuals from seeking help, perpetuating a cycle of poor mental health and obesity. Addressing mental health as a critical component of obesity interventions could provide a dual benefit: improving mental well-being while tackling obesity.

Another crucial discovery of the study was the role of economic factors in dietary choices. Veterans facing financial hardships frequently resort to cheap, calorie-dense food that lacks nutritional value. Food deserts—areas with limited access to affordable and healthy food options—are a significant hurdle for many veterans, further complicating their efforts to maintain a healthy diet. The authors advocate for policy changes that promote food accessibility, suggesting that improved access to healthy foods could have a profound impact on veterans’ health outcomes.

In addition to economic and social barriers, the study also pointed out the physical environment’s influence on obesity rates. Veterans living in neighborhoods with limited recreational spaces or unsafe environments are less likely to engage in physical activity. Urban designs that do not prioritize walkability or safe outdoor spaces can lead to a sedentary lifestyle, which is a critical factor in the obesity epidemic. As such, urban planning that considers the health needs of veterans could be instrumental in promoting better health outcomes.

Collaboration between healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations is essential to create a multi-faceted approach to combatting obesity among high-risk veterans. The study calls for comprehensive support systems that address not only the physical health of veterans but also the underlying social determinants that drive obesity. This aligns with a broader movement towards social prescribing, where healthcare providers connect patients with community resources that can assist in addressing non-medical issues affecting their health.

The implications of the study extend beyond the veteran population. Policymakers and public health officials must recognize the interconnectedness of social risks and health outcomes across various demographics. By understanding that factors such as socioeconomic status, mental health, and physical environments contribute to health inequities, more effective interventions can be designed to address these root causes rather than merely treating the symptoms.

In conclusion, this research serves as a clarion call for immediate action to address the alarming rates of obesity among high-risk veterans. By emphasizing the importance of social determinants of health, the study encourages stakeholders across sectors to work collaboratively towards sustainable solutions. As the findings suggest, tackling obesity is not solely a medical issue but a societal one, requiring comprehensive strategies that address the various factors influencing health in this vulnerable population.

To fully leverage the insights gained from this study, further research is needed to track the long-term impacts of social interventions on obesity among veterans. As we enter an era where health equality is increasingly prioritized, understanding and addressing the social risks inherent to specific populations will be crucial. The veteran community deserves tailored support that acknowledges their unique challenges, ultimately fostering a healthier future for those who have served.

In summary, the intersection of obesity and social risks in high-risk veterans is a pressing public health concern that demands immediate attention. This research not only provides important data but also strengthens the argument for comprehensive, community-oriented solutions aimed at improving the health of one of society’s most deserving groups. It is through such studies that we can hope to better understand and tackle the challenges of obesity in veterans, ultimately paving the way for a healthier generation going forward.

Subject of Research: The associations between social risks and obesity in high-risk veterans.

Article Title: Associations Between Social Risks and Obesity in High-risk Veterans.

Article References:

Kane, R.M., Stechuchak, K.M., Greene, L. et al. Associations Between Social Risks and Obesity in High-risk Veterans.
J GEN INTERN MED (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-10056-0

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-10056-0

Keywords: obesity, veterans, social determinants of health, public health, socioeconomic factors, mental health, food accessibility.

At the heart of this research lies the urgency of addressing issues related to anorectal sexual function, particularly in populations that face heightened vulnerability due to various medical conditions, treatments, or societal stigma. Traditionally, discussions surrounding sexual health have predominantly centered around conventional areas, thereby neglecting the anorectal dimension, which can significantly influence personal relationships and individual quality of life. The study seeks to bridge this gap, fostering a broader understanding and facilitating a more comprehensive approach to sexual health.

One of the pivotal aspects of the study is the rigorous validation of the new measure designed to assess anorectal sexual function. This validation process is not merely an academic exercise; it holds profound implications for clinical methodologies and patient care. By ensuring that this measurement accurately reflects patients’ experiences, clinicians can more effectively diagnose and treat sexual dysfunctions that are linked to anorectal conditions. This is particularly crucial given that many individuals may suffer in silence, grappling with complex emotions tied to both their health and sexual identity.

The methodology employed in this research is equally fascinating. The researchers utilized a variety of statistical tools to evaluate the reliability and validity of the measure, ensuring it resonates with lived experiences. Through robust data collection methods encompassing both qualitative and quantitative dimensions, the study meticulously analyzed feedback from diverse patient populations. This multifaceted approach amplifies the credibility of the findings, serving as a testament to the researchers’ commitment to excellence in health measurement science.

Engagement with participants revealed not only the clinical implications of anorectal sexual function but also the emotional landscape associated with it. Many individuals reported feeling marginalized due to their conditions, and this study aims to dismantle the barriers to open conversation. By promoting awareness and emphasizing the validity of the measure, the researchers advocate for comprehensive sexual health dialogue in both clinical settings and public domains. The findings thus aspire to empower patients, enabling them to voice their concerns and seek the necessary help without stigma.

Furthermore, the implications of this research extend into the realm of medical education. Training healthcare providers to recognize and discuss anorectal health openly can radically transform patient care. The research team advocates for integrating anorectal sexual health into curricula, thereby equipping future generations of healthcare professionals with the skills and knowledge necessary to handle these sensitive conversations adeptly. This not only enhances provider-patient relationships but also fosters a culture of inclusivity and understanding in the medical field.

The timing of this study could not be more pertinent, given the contemporary shifts in societal attitudes regarding sexual health and the rights of individuals to receive comprehensive care. As conversations around sexual health become more normalized, the researchers hope that their work catalyzes further exploration into niche areas of health that have long been shrouded in secrecy and neglect. The representation of anorectal sexual function in the broader discourse is no longer relegated to the shadows; it demands a rightful place in health discussions.

Addressing the challenges of practical application, the new measure proposed by the researchers stands out due to its clinical utility. It serves as an instrument not only for assessment but also for therapeutic intervention. By utilizing this measure, clinicians can tailor interventions to meet patient needs more effectively and monitor outcomes systematically. The measure’s design emphasizes accessibility and user-friendliness, ensuring that patients can engage with it comfortably during their healthcare journeys.

As this research garners attention within the scientific community and beyond, one key takeaway emerges: the necessity of fostering an environment where individuals feel comfortable discussing anorectal sexual function with their healthcare providers. This is a call to action for all stakeholders in healthcare settings to champion a more inclusive approach to patient interactions. Educators, practitioners, policy-makers, and advocates must collaborate to establish foundational changes that promote awareness and acceptance.

In summary, this pioneering research offers a foundation for future investigations into anorectal sexual function and its broader implications on individual health. By prioritizing this previously neglected area, the authors have opened pathways for subsequent studies that may quantify the impacts of interventions and identify further dimensions of sexual health. It is a timely reminder that sexual health is holistic, encompassing not just the physiological aspects, but the emotional and psychological domains as well.

As we look forward to how this research influences clinical practices, the continued dialogue surrounding anorectal sexual function will be vital. Engaging patients, clinicians, and researchers alike in discussions that transcend traditional boundaries will accelerate the dismantling of stigma and promote understanding. The implications of this work reach far beyond data; they strive to enhance lives, making healthcare more responsive and attuned to the nuances of human experience.

The groundwork has been laid for a new era of inquiry into anorectal health, heralding a focus that is both critical and overdue. The pioneering spirits of researchers like Gaither, Anderson, and Balcazar will inspire a new wave of investigation, propelling the need for continued exploration and advocacy. In doing so, we move closer to a future where all dimensions of health are recognized and treated with the dignity they deserve.

Subject of Research: Anorectal sexual function assessment and its clinical implications.

Article Title: Assessing Anorectal Sexual Function: Validity and Clinical Utility of a New Measure

Article References:

Gaither, T.W., Anderson, M., Balcazar, J.A. et al. Assessing Anorectal Sexual Function: Validity and Clinical Utility of a New Measure.
J GEN INTERN MED (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09852-5

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09852-5

Keywords: Anorectal health, sexual function, clinical utility, health assessment, patient care.

In the context of HIV, the immune system is compromised, leaving patients vulnerable to various infections and cancers. Among those risks, anal squamous cell carcinoma stands out due to its increased prevalence in this population. Understanding the biological mechanisms behind this heightened risk is crucial to developing effective intervention strategies. The research highlights how high-grade lesions can serve as precursors to invasive cancer, emphasizing the need for early detection and treatment.

The study employed a robust set of methodologies, incorporating both clinical data and observational research to identify the links between the management of HSIL and cancer progression. The researchers meticulously analyzed patient outcomes over time, providing compelling evidence that timely intervention plays a vital role in preventing the onset of anal cancer. These findings not only provide a basis for clinical practice but also pave the way for further research in this domain.

Turning to the specifics of the findings, the researchers observed a striking reduction in the rates of invasive anal cancer among those treated for HSIL as compared to unscreened individuals. This results signify a significant leap in preventive measures that can be easily implemented in healthcare settings. By focusing on early treatment, the healthcare community can potentially diminish the likelihood of developing a life-threatening condition that burdens many HIV-positive patients.

Additionally, the authors addressed the broader implications of their findings in regards to public health policies. They advocate for increased awareness and screening programs tailored specifically for vulnerable populations, particularly those living with HIV. By establishing guidelines that foster early diagnosis and intervention, healthcare providers can bridge the gap between risk and effective management, significantly improving life expectancy and quality of life for their patients.

Equally critical is the discussion on healthcare accessibility and education. Many individuals living with HIV may not be aware of the risks associated with anal HSIL or the preventive options available. This underlines the necessity for community outreach and education efforts to ensure patients understand their health status and the importance of regular screenings. The researchers emphasize that healthcare systems must prioritize educational initiatives that inform patients about the link between HIV, HSIL, and anal cancer.

Another key aspect discussed in the study is the role of healthcare providers in delivering patient-centered care. Physicians must be equipped not only with the knowledge of these conditions but also with the sensitivity required to communicate the risks effectively. Establishing open lines of communication fosters trust, empowering patients to engage proactively with their health. This is particularly relevant in populations that may experience stigma or fear surrounding their HIV status.

As researchers strive towards enhancing patient outcomes, they also point to the promising area of immunotherapy treatment options for high-grade lesions. By harnessing the body’s immune response, these treatments could offer a robust avenue for combating not only existing lesions but also the potential for malignant transformation. This avenue of exploration is still in its infancy, yet it opens up exciting possibilities for future research and clinical practices.

Furthermore, ongoing studies must address the long-term sustainability of current treatment protocols. Will the benefits observed in short-term analyses hold true over decades? Are there potential side effects or complications that could arise from aggressive treatments? Monitoring these factors will be essential to ensuring that the healthcare community can provide comprehensive and holistic management strategies for HIV-positive patients.

The landscape of HIV treatment is continuously evolving, shaped by ongoing research like that undertaken by Allon and colleagues. As healthcare providers embrace innovative approaches to managing HSIL and associated risks, they must not lose sight of the multidimensional challenges faced by individuals living with HIV. Fostering a holistic approach that encompasses mental health, social support, and regular medical care is paramount to achieving optimal patient outcomes.

In summary, the groundbreaking study underscores the necessity of addressing anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions as a key public health concern. By implementing early detection and treatment protocols, healthcare providers can significantly impact the lives of individuals with HIV. With an emphasis on education and accessibility, stakeholders can establish pathways that lead to better health outcomes, ultimately reducing the incidence of invasive anal cancer where it matters most. The call to action resonates loudly; the time for change in healthcare practices is now.

The importance of these findings transcends the individual patient level, signaling a shift towards more proactive health strategies within at-risk populations. By utilizing insights derived from this research, healthcare professionals can better inform their strategies and protocols, elevating the standard of care provided to those living with HIV. The implications are vast, promising a brighter future for countless individuals who rely on effective management of their health to lead fulfilling lives.

The research illustrates a hopeful advance in the fight against cancer in HIV-positive populations, a reminder that with continued efforts, strides can be made toward a future where HIV is no longer a life-limiting condition, and associated risks are managed effectively. Each new study, such as the one by Allon and colleagues, not only contributes to the scientific tapestry of knowledge but also has the power to transform lives.

As healthcare professionals digest and implement these findings, we stand at the precipice of a new era in HIV treatment—one defined by informed choices, early interventions, and the relentless pursuit of improved patient outcomes.

Subject of Research: Treatment of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-positive patients to reduce progression to anal cancer.

Article Title: EBM BLS: Treating Anal High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Reduces Progression to Invasive Anal Cancer in People Living with HIV.

Article References:

Allon, S., Alexander, J.T. & Terndrup, C. EBM BLS: Treating Anal High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Reduces Progression to Invasive Anal Cancer in People Living with HIV.
J GEN INTERN MED (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09828-5

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI:

Keywords: HIV, anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, anal cancer, treatment, prevention.

Hypertension, commonly known as high blood pressure, affects millions of Americans and is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease and stroke. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that nearly half of U.S. adults have hypertension, making it imperative to find effective management strategies. Telehealth has emerged as a promising tool to bridge gaps in care, especially for patients who may struggle to access traditional in-person appointments. The study highlights the extent to which telehealth has been adopted to monitor and manage hypertension, offering insights into its effectiveness and utilization metrics.

Before delving into the findings, it is essential to understand the utilization patterns of telehealth in relation to antihypertensive medications. The study notes a marked increase in telehealth consultations among patients diagnosed with hypertension, especially during periods when social distancing measures were in effect. This shift towards virtual healthcare has not only enabled patients to receive timely medical advice but also provided ongoing monitoring of their condition without the need for physical visits. As healthcare systems continue to evolve, the implications of these findings could shape future hypertension management protocols.

One of the salient points raised in the study is the demographic shifts in telehealth utilization. The research indicates that while telehealth reached broader patient populations, certain groups—such as those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds—remain at a disadvantage. This digital divide raises significant concerns about health equity, a vital issue in the context of hypertension management. By analyzing patient demographics and their corresponding uptake of telehealth services, the study emphasizes the necessity for targeted interventions aimed at improving access for vulnerable populations.

Moreover, the study delves into the relationship between telehealth usage and adherence to antihypertensive medications. Preliminary findings suggest that patients engaged through telehealth platforms exhibited higher medication adherence rates compared to their counterparts who relied solely on traditional office visits. The robust follow-up and adherence behavior may be attributed to the convenience and accessibility of telehealth services, wherein patients are more likely to discuss medication side effects or adjustment needs during virtual consultations.

In exploring the effectiveness of telehealth in hypertension management, the study also highlights the varying degrees of patient satisfaction. While many patients report a favorable experience with telehealth services, concerns linger about the necessity of in-person examinations for comprehensive care. Patients often question the thoroughness of virtual check-ups, particularly for conditions that require physical assessments or laboratory tests. The need to balance virtual and in-person visits is underscored, leading to discussions about hybrid models of care that could enhance patient outcomes.

Furthermore, the study reviews the technological barriers that may impede the effective use of telehealth. Issues such as internet access, technological literacy, and digital device availability can disproportionately affect certain demographics. There’s a pressing need for healthcare providers and policymakers to recognize these barriers and implement strategies that ameliorate access to telehealth, thus facilitating better hypertension management across diverse populations.

The implications of this study extend beyond hypertension alone. The successful integration of telehealth services in managing chronic conditions could serve as a blueprint for other areas of healthcare. By analyzing the impact of telehealth on medication adherence and patient engagement, the research lays the groundwork for broader applications in chronic disease management.

As telehealth continues to evolve, ongoing research is crucial to understand its long-term viability in managing chronic diseases like hypertension. Future studies should focus on refining telehealth methodologies and exploring their impact over extended periods. This is essential not only to gauge effectiveness but also to establish best practices for virtual healthcare.

Additionally, integration with electronic health records (EHR) can enhance the efficiency of telehealth consultations for hypertension management. By allowing seamless communication between patients and providers, EHR systems can ensure that health data is available in real-time, thus facilitating better decision-making and care coordination.

Patient education and engagement strategies are vital components highlighted in the study. Providing patients with educational resources about hypertension, its management, and the role of telehealth can empower them to take charge of their health. This proactive approach promotes greater awareness of medication adherence and encourages patients to actively participate in their treatment plans.

In conclusion, the study underscores the transformative potential of telehealth in the management of hypertension among U.S. adults. As healthcare continues to embrace digital innovations, the lessons learned from this research can guide future practices, policies, and research aimed at optimizing hypertension care. With a focus on equitable access and patient-centered care, the findings may reshape the narrative of chronic disease management in an increasingly digital world.

The trend towards telehealth signifies a pivotal shift in how healthcare is delivered, promising a more efficient and accessible approach to chronic disease management. As we look ahead, harnessing the power of technology while maintaining the essential human element of healthcare will be key to improving outcomes for patients grappling with hypertension and beyond.

Subject of Research: Telehealth and antihypertensive medications use among US adults with hypertension.

Article Title: Use of Telehealth and Antihypertensive Medications Among US Adults with Hypertension

Article References:

Liu, T., Chaitoff, A., Bress, A. et al. Use of Telehealth and Antihypertensive Medications Among US Adults with Hypertension.
J GEN INTERN MED (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09731-z

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09731-z

Keywords: Telehealth, Hypertension, Antihypertensive medications, Patient adherence, Health equity, Chronic disease management.