<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Italian ryegrass &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/italian-ryegrass/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 15:28:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Mixing Sand Into Oily Soil Supercharges Plant-Microbe Cleanup of Petroleum Pollution</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/mixing-sand-into-oily-soil-supercharges-plant-microbe-cleanup-of-petroleum-pollution/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Savannah Blake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 15:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioremediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dietzia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dissolved organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineered soil amendments for oil spill cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundwater protection from petroleum pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italian ryegrass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term soil health after petroleum contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial enhancement in oily soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial inoculants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill cleanup using soil engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petroleum hydrocarbon soil contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petroleum hydrocarbons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phytoremediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-microbe interactions in contaminated soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid bioremediation techniques for petroleum pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizodegradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil physical properties and pollutant removal efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil structure and pollutant degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil texture modification for bioremediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable soil remediation methods]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=223422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Australian researchers found that blending oil-contaminated soils to an intermediate loamy texture, combined with Italian ryegrass and microbial inoculants, boosted petroleum hydrocarbon removal to as much as 94 percent in six months.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Petroleum hydrocarbons are among the most stubborn pollutants on Earth. When crude oil is extracted, refined, transported, or stored, spills and leaks leave behind soils saturated with toxic compounds that can destroy soil structure, poison microbes and soil animals, starve plants of nutrients, and slash crop yields. Contaminated ground does not simply sit still, either. Rainwater trickling through oily soil can carry hydrocarbons into groundwater, wind can lift contaminated dust into the air, and crop plants can accumulate petroleum residues in their tissues, creating health risks for people who inhale, ingest, or drink these pollutants. Now, a team of researchers in Australia has shown that one of the most overlooked physical properties of soil, its texture, can be deliberately engineered to dramatically accelerate the natural cleanup of oil-contaminated ground, achieving removal rates of up to 94 percent in just six months.</p>
<p>The study, published in the journal Cleaner Engineering and Technology, was led by Ebhohon Endurance Odion of Deakin University together with Chuxia Lin, Jiaojiao Ma, and Lambert Brau. Rather than focusing solely on the microbes or plants that break down petroleum, the team asked a more fundamental question: does the physical makeup of the soil itself, the balance between fine clay particles and coarse sand grains, control how fast hydrocarbons disappear? The answer, it turns out, is a resounding yes, and the finding could reshape how we remediate oil spills in some of the world&#8217;s most polluted landscapes.</p>
<p>To test this idea, the researchers built a controlled experiment of unusual rigor. They formulated five distinct soil textures by mixing a clayey garden soil with beach sand collected from Williamstown Beach in Melbourne, ranging from pure clay through intermediate loams to pure sand. Each soil was spiked with 50 milliliters of commercial engine oil per kilogram of soil, producing an initial total extractable petroleum hydrocarbon concentration of 45,680 milligrams per kilogram. Crucially, the contamination was dominated by the hard-to-degrade fractions: 26,000 milligrams per kilogram in the C16-C34 range and 19,500 milligrams per kilogram in the C34-C40 range, with only a tiny 180 milligrams per kilogram in the lighter C10-C16 fraction. This mimics the situation in arid oil-producing regions, where volatile short-chain hydrocarbons evaporate quickly and leave behind persistent long-chain residues.</p>
<p>Into each pot went 25 seedlings of Italian ryegrass, Lolium multiflorum, a species chosen for its dense fibrous root system, rapid establishment, and proven tolerance of hydrocarbon stress. Half of the pots also received a blend of two commercial microbial inoculants, RemActiv from Ziltek and Ultra-Archaea from Ultra-Tech International, whose dominant bacterial genera, including Propionibacterium, Clostridium, Sphingomonas, and Ralstonia, were confirmed by DNA sequencing before application. The pots were grown in a randomized block design in a growth chamber at 23 degrees Celsius with a 16-hour photoperiod, watered every two days, and monitored for six months. Hydrocarbon analysis was performed by an accredited laboratory using gas chromatography, while the soil bacterial communities were profiled through 16S rRNA gene sequencing.</p>
<p>The plant growth results revealed a striking sweet spot. The mixed-loam soil containing equal parts clayey soil and sand, designated Type M, produced the tallest plants and by far the greatest biomass, with inoculated plants in that treatment reaching 36.73 grams of fresh root biomass and 37.98 grams of fresh shoot biomass, the highest values in the entire experiment. Deviating from that ratio in either direction reduced growth. Pure sand performed worst of all, hampered not only by its coarse texture but also by a pH of 9, elevated salinity of 628 microsiemens per centimeter, and almost no organic matter or nutrients. Surprisingly, the pure clay soil, despite containing the highest total concentrations of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium, also supported relatively poor growth, because nutrients in clay-rich soils become locked away through fixation processes and the oil itself clogs the already restricted pore network, choking off oxygen and water movement.</p>
<p>This nutrient paradox is one of the study&#8217;s most instructive lessons. Total nutrient concentration alone did not predict plant success; accessibility did. In the balanced loam, roots could proliferate freely, oxygen could diffuse, and nutrients could be mineralized and mobilized, partly with the help of the added microbes. In every soil texture, inoculated plants outgrew their uninoculated counterparts, suggesting the inoculants boosted growth by enhancing nutrient mineralization and by quickly degrading the most phytotoxic hydrocarbons, giving seedlings a cleaner start in life.</p>
<p>The microbial sequencing data added another layer of intrigue. Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria dominated all soils, and inoculation consistently increased both the total number of sequence variants and the abundance of known hydrocarbon degraders. But here is the twist: none of the bacterial genera originally present in the commercial inoculants were detected at harvest. The introduced strains had apparently lost the competition with native microbes. Their benefit was instead a kind of microbial starter motor, kick-starting degradation early in the experiment when indigenous degraders were still sluggish, lowering toxicity, and allowing the plants and their native microbial partners to take over.</p>
<p>The chain of causation the researchers uncovered is elegant. Better soil texture produced better root growth. More root biomass released more dissolved organic carbon into the rhizosphere through root exudation and decaying plant debris. The data showed a strong positive relationship between dried root biomass and soil dissolved organic carbon, and an equally tight relationship between that carbon and the abundance of the eleven major hydrocarbon-degrading bacterial genera. In other words, plants feed the exact microbes that eat the pollution, and as those microbes dismantle the hydrocarbons, the soil becomes less toxic, allowing the plants to grow even more. Notably, non-degrading bacteria did not benefit from this carbon windfall, likely because hydrocarbon degraders enjoy a competitive advantage, able to exploit both plant-derived carbon and petroleum itself as food. Among the degraders, the genus Dietzia dominated across all soil types, thriving in the experiment&#8217;s 23-degree, near-neutral conditions, while genera preferring hotter or more acidic conditions, such as Rhodococcus, remained suppressed.</p>
<p>The bottom-line remediation numbers are what make this study genuinely exciting. After six months, uninoculated control soils removed only 15 to 47 percent of their total petroleum hydrocarbons, while inoculated soils achieved removal rates between 29 and 94 percent. The strongest performances came from the intermediate textures, the loamy sand and clayey loam, which offered the best balance of water retention, aeration, oxygen diffusion, nutrient supply, and root penetration. These results align with earlier work showing that loamy sands outperform silty clays for hydrocarbon removal, and they confirm that even the best microbial inoculant cannot compensate for hostile soil physics.</p>
<p>The practical implications reach far beyond the greenhouse. Many of the world&#8217;s oil-producing nations sit in desert and semi-desert regions where coarse, sandy soils dominate and long-chain hydrocarbons persist after the volatile fractions evaporate. Kuwait&#8217;s first Gulf War oil fires inundated 114 square kilometers of desert land, and similar contamination is widespread across oil-producing regions. This study suggests a deceptively simple, cost-effective intervention: blend overly coarse or overly fine contaminated soils toward an intermediate texture, plant hydrocarbon-tolerant grasses, and add an initial microbial boost. The authors are candid about limitations, noting that unplanted controls were not included, so the exact share of hydrocarbon loss attributable to rhizosphere processes versus plant-free dissipation could not be partitioned, and that freshly spiked soils differ from aged field contamination. Future work with naturally contaminated field soils, mixed contaminants such as heavy metals and salinity, and field-scale trials will be needed. But the core message stands: sometimes the key to cleaning up pollution lies not in adding more chemistry or more microbes, but in reshaping the very ground beneath our feet.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Enhancing rhizodegradation of mid- to long-chain petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soils through soil texture modification, plant growth, and microbial inoculation</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Modification of soil texture as a means to enhance rhizodegradation of mid- to long-chain petroleum hydrocarbons in soils</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Odion, E. E., Lin, C., Ma, J., &amp; Brau, L. (2026). Modification of soil texture as a means to enhance rhizodegradation of mid- to long-chain petroleum hydrocarbons in soils. <em>Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 35</em>, Article 101331. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2026.101331" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2026.101331</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2026.101331" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.clet.2026.101331</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> soil texture, rhizodegradation, petroleum hydrocarbons, bioremediation, Italian ryegrass, microbial inoculants, rhizosphere, dissolved organic carbon, Dietzia, soil contamination, phytoremediation, loam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">223422</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>First NAM Population in Italian Ryegrass Pinpoints Genes Behind Seed Shattering</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/first-nam-population-in-italian-ryegrass-pinpoints-genes-behind-seed-shattering/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptation of NAM approach to perennial grasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breeding strategies to reduce seed loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candidate genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop improvement for seed retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddRAD sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic impact of seed shattering in forage seed production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flowering time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic analysis of seed shattering mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic basis of seed dispersal in Lolium multiflorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic regions controlling seed detachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomic selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomics of seed retention traits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-resolution genetic mapping in outcrossing plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving seed yield in temperate forage crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italian ryegrass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lolium multiflorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nested association mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nested association mapping in forage grasses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantitative trait loci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seed shattering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seed shattering in Italian ryegrass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seed yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNP]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=195207</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have built the first nested association mapping population in Italian ryegrass, identifying genomic regions and a ripening-related candidate gene linked to seed shattering and seed yield.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) is one of the most important forage grasses in temperate agriculture, prized for its rapid growth, high digestibility and adaptability to intensive grazing and cutting systems. Yet behind its agronomic value lies a stubborn problem that has long frustrated breeders: the plant sheds its seeds before they can be harvested. Seed shattering, the natural mechanism by which mature seeds detach from the spike, can dramatically reduce the seed yield of commercial seed production fields. Because profitable cultivar development depends on reliable and high seed yields, shattering represents a direct economic loss, and until now it had never been systematically targeted in Italian ryegrass breeding programs. A new study changes that picture by presenting the first nested association mapping (NAM) population ever established in this outcrossing forage grass and by using it to expose, at high resolution, the genomic regions that govern seed shattering and related seed yield traits.</p>
<p>Nested association mapping is a breeding and genetic analysis strategy that has transformed quantitative genetics in self-pollinating crops such as maize and barley. The approach crosses a single common parent with a panel of diverse founders, producing a family of related subpopulations that share a common genetic backdrop while carrying segments of DNA from each founder. This design combines the mapping power of genome-wide association studies, which exploit historical recombination across diverse lines, with the controlled structure of linkage mapping, which traces inheritance through known pedigrees. The result is a population in which the researchers can detect trait-associated genomic regions with both high statistical power and high resolution. However, building a NAM population in an outcrossing species such as Italian ryegrass is far more challenging than in self-pollinating crops, because strong inbreeding depression and high genetic heterogeneity complicate the creation of structured, homozygous material.</p>
<p>The research team, working at Agroscope and ETH Zurich, overcame these obstacles by crossing one common founder plant with 23 genetically diverse founders to generate a NAM population of 708 F2 individuals. To genotype this population efficiently, the researchers employed reduced-representation sequencing, specifically double-digest restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (ddRAD), on all 708 F2 plants. They complemented this with whole genome sequencing of the 24 founder plants. By integrating the two datasets, they imputed high-density genotype information across the entire population, ultimately assembling a catalog of 3,199,253 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). This dense SNP landscape served three purposes at once: it enabled analysis of the population&#8217;s structure, it allowed parentship verification to confirm the integrity of the family design, and it supplied the marker data needed for genome-wide association studies linking genetic variation to measured traits.</p>
<p>Genotyping alone would be meaningless without rigorous phenotyping. The team therefore evaluated the NAM population in three field trials, recording data on seed shattering together with seed yield and a set of related characteristics including spike length, flag leaf length, spikelets per spike and flowering time. These trials revealed substantial phenotypic variance within the population, exactly what a mapping population should deliver. In other words, the offspring families differed measurably and consistently in how readily their seeds shattered and in how much seed they produced, providing the raw statistical signal needed to connect phenotypes to genomic regions. The breadth of variation also confirmed that the diverse founders contributed a wide spectrum of alleles relevant to breeding, validating the choice of the founder panel.</p>
<p>The association analyses yielded seven quantitative trait loci (QTL), genomic regions whose allelic composition statistically explains variation in the measured traits. These loci were associated with seed shattering, seed yield, spike length, flag leaf length and flowering time. Within the QTL intervals, the researchers performed a candidate gene analysis, scanning the annotated genes in each region for plausible functional links to the traits. This search identified one putative candidate gene for seed shattering and three putative candidate genes for flowering time. The flowering time candidates are particularly noteworthy because flowering time is tightly correlated with reproductive development and can indirectly influence both seed retention and seed yield, so knowing where its genetic switches reside helps breeders interpret the seed shattering signal more accurately.</p>
<p>The standout result concerns the gene chr7.26897, located within a seed shattering QTL on chromosome 7. A significantly associated SNP inside this gene explained 10.03 percent of the phenotypic variance in seed shattering, a large effect by the standards of complex quantitative traits. The gene is known to participate in ripening-related pathways, a biologically coherent connection, since shattering is developmentally timed with fruit and seed maturation. In many grasses, the abscission layer at the base of the seed or spikelet degrades as ripening proceeds, allowing the seed to detach. A ripening-related gene emerging as the strongest candidate suggests that the timing or intensity of the maturation program directly modulates how firmly the seed is held. For breeders, a single marker accounting for roughly one tenth of the trait variation is immediately actionable: it can be deployed in marker-assisted selection to screen seedlings for the favorable allele long before field-scale seed yield can be measured.</p>
<p>The implications extend beyond seed shattering itself. Seed yield in forage grass seed production is a composite trait shaped by flowering synchrony, spike architecture, seed retention and plant vigor. By mapping QTL for seed yield, spike length, flag leaf length and flowering time within the same population, the study builds an integrated genetic framework in which breeders can consider trade-offs and correlations among traits. For example, selection for reduced shattering must not compromise flowering time adaptation or spike development, and a NAM population makes it possible to check for such side effects at the genomic level. The identified loci therefore constitute a valuable resource for breeding programs aiming to raise seed yields while preserving the agronomic performance that makes Italian ryegrass a cornerstone of dairy and livestock production.</p>
<p>Methodologically, the study demonstrates that NAM populations can be successfully constructed and exploited in outcrossing forage grasses, a group of species that has lagged behind major cereals in genomic resources. The combination of ddRAD sequencing in hundreds of offspring with whole genome sequencing of founders offers a cost-effective blueprint for other outcrossing species where full genome sequencing of every individual remains prohibitive. The authors emphasize that the QTL regions harboring putative candidate genes are promising targets for functional validation, the next step in confirming which genes causally control the traits. Functional validation, typically through mutant analysis, gene expression studies or transgenic approaches, would convert statistical associations into mechanistic understanding of the shattering pathway.</p>
<p>For the seed industry, the prospect of cultivars that hold their seeds until harvest could translate directly into higher and more stable seed yields, reducing the cost of forage seed and supporting the rapid turnover of improved varieties on farms. For science, the first Italian ryegrass NAM population opens a durable platform: the same 708-line resource and its 3.2 million SNPs can be re-phenotyped for drought tolerance, disease resistance, nutritive value and countless other traits in future studies. What began as a targeted effort to stop seeds from falling has instead delivered a foundation for decoding the genetic architecture of complex traits in one of agriculture&#8217;s most widely sown grasses, and it signals a new era in which forage grass breeding can draw on the same powerful population genetics tools that have revolutionized the world&#8217;s staple cereal crops.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Genetic mapping of seed shattering in Italian ryegrass using the species&#x27; first nested association mapping population</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> The first Nested Association Mapping (NAM) population for Italian ryegrass reveals genomic regions associated with seed shattering</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kiesbauer, J., Grieder, C., Sindelar, M., Schlatter, L. H., Ariza Suarez, D., Yates, S., Stoffel-Studer, I., Copetti, D., Studer, B., &amp; Kölliker, R. (2026). The first Nested Association Mapping (NAM) population for Italian ryegrass reveals genomic regions associated with seed shattering. <em>BMC Plant Biology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09936-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09936-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09936-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s12870-026-09936-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Italian ryegrass, Lolium multiflorum, nested association mapping, seed shattering, quantitative trait loci, SNP, ddRAD sequencing, genomic selection, plant breeding, seed yield, flowering time, candidate genes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">195207</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
