<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>invasive species in Europe &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/invasive-species-in-europe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 18:05:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Desert moth rides African winds into Spain but never stays, DNA and weather records reveal</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/desert-moth-rides-african-winds-into-spain-but-never-stays-dna-and-weather-records-reveal/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 18:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agrotis herzogi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agrotis herzogi distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate influence on moth migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desert moth migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desert-adapted insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA analysis of desert moths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA barcoding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iberian Peninsula]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iberian Peninsula moth sightings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive species in Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean region moth records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moth migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moth population establishment in Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noctuidae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North African wind dispersal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phenology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strait of Gibraltar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vagrancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather records and insect movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind-assisted dispersal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind-borne insect dispersal mechanisms]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=287654</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study shows the desert moth Agrotis herzogi reaches southern Iberia through recurrent wind-assisted immigration from North Africa, with no evidence of resident populations.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A moth of the desert has been quietly knocking on Europe&#8217;s door. Agrotis herzogi, a noctuid moth whose natural range stretches across the arid belt from the Canary Islands and Morocco to western India, is turning up more and more often on the southern fringes of the Iberian Peninsula. A new study in the Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift has now assembled the fullest picture yet of these appearances, and the verdict is striking: the moths are being blown in from North Africa on southerly winds, but so far there is no evidence that any of them has ever managed to build a lasting population on European soil.</p>
<p>The research team, led by José Luis Yela of the University of Castilla-La Mancha together with Eduardo Marabuto and Antonio S. Ortiz, compiled every reliable record of A. herzogi from the Iberian-Balearic area, deliberately excluding unverified internet sightings. That effort added 27 previously unpublished records to the handful already in the literature, expanding the species&#8217; known footprint dramatically, from the Lisbon coastline all the way to Alicante on the Mediterranean, with a single specimen even captured in Mallorca in the Balearic Islands in October 2025. Yet beneath this apparent range expansion lies a very different story.</p>
<p>The distribution of records is anything but uniform. Seventeen of the 27 new observations come from the Strait of Gibraltar area and its immediate surroundings in the province of Cádiz, including the Tarifa and Vejer de la Frontera localities, with the rest clustered in the Algarve region of Portugal and along the south-eastern Spanish coast. The Strait is the point where Europe and Africa come closest, a mere 14 kilometres of water apart, and it acts as one of the principal aerial bottlenecks for anything carried northward on the wind. The authors argue that this spatial clustering reflects an arrival zone, a place where wind-borne immigrants are disproportionately detected, rather than a stronghold of resident moths.</p>
<p>Even more telling is the timing. Despite nearly continuous light-trapping at key sites such as Tarifa and Vejer over the past decade, the records bunch into a small number of years: 2015 in western Portugal and Britain, 2017 in southern Portugal, 2022 around Tarifa and Huelva, and 2025 along the Mediterranean coast as far as Mallorca. A stable resident population would be expected to produce regular detections year after year. Instead, the pattern of boom-and-bust appearance, with nothing in between, is the classic signature of episodic immigration, where insects cross the sea in discrete pulses whenever the atmosphere cooperates.</p>
<p>That cooperation is precisely what the meteorological analysis revealed. When the team plotted the dates of the 19 nights with records against wind reconstructions from the HYSPLIT trajectory model and the Ventusky platform, they found that on 14 of those nights, some 74 percent, prevailing winds blew from the south, south-west or south-east. On individual nights, the inferred origins shifted across North Africa: south-easterlies pointed toward the coastline between Morocco and Tunisia, including Algeria, while south-westerlies suggested sources as far afield as the Canary Islands, Morocco or north-western Algeria. The authors caution that these attributions remain tentative, since moths may arrive hours or days before detection and winds shift with altitude and time of night, but the overall correlation is biologically compelling.</p>
<p>Genetics added a final layer of evidence. The team sequenced the mitochondrial COI barcode region from two adults collected in Cádiz and compared the sequences with public data in the Barcode of Life Data System, then built a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree with related Agrotis species and an Euxoa outgroup. Both Iberian specimens fell squarely into Barcode Index Number BOLD:AFE3262, a cluster that also includes individuals from Saudi Arabia, Iran, Israel and Tenerife in the Canary Islands. The differentiation among these seven moths was shallow and showed no geographic structure, exactly what would be expected if recurrent long-distance immigration keeps gene flowing across an enormous range, and if the Iberian arrivals represent recent contact with those distant source populations rather than an isolated, diverging colony.</p>
<p>Ecology tells a similar story of failed settlement. No immature stages of A. herzogi have ever been confirmed in the wild in the Iberian-Balearic area, and the habitats where the moths are caught do not fully match those known from its core range. In Israel, the only place with published larval data, the species feeds subterraneously on the roots of Atriplex leucoclada bushes on semi-consolidated sand dunes, a plant that does not occur in Iberia. Other Atriplex species, such as A. halimus along the coast and A. patula and A. prostrata inland, are widespread in southern Spain and could in principle serve as hosts, but the moth&#8217;s specific requirements for soft sedimentary soils in shallow ravines and large depressions may simply be missing from most of the region. The scarcity of records away from the coast further suggests that arriving individuals remain confined to peri-coastal environments and never penetrate far inland.</p>
<p>The study also puts A. herzogi in a wider context of Afro-Mediterranean insect traffic. In recent years, numerous moth species of African origin have been recorded for the first time in the southern Iberian Peninsula, including Mythimna languida, Agrotis subspinifera, Chrysodeixis acuta and Tytroca dispar. Most remain occasional vagrants, but a few, such as M. languida, Eublemma baccatrix and Condica capensis, have established themselves. The contrast with E. baccatrix is especially instructive: unknown in both North Africa and Iberia as recently as 2022, it is now recorded regularly across the southern third of the peninsula, with continuous records across years and clear spatial expansion, hallmarks of genuine colonisation that A. herzogi conspicuously lacks. Repeated arrival, it turns out, is not the same thing as successful establishment; ecological compatibility ultimately decides the outcome.</p>
<p>The phenology of the Iberian moths, with adults flying from October to April, matches the autumn-to-spring flight period described across the species&#8217; range and points to an extended univoltine life cycle. That seasonality aligns neatly with the autumn and winter wind regimes that dominate the Strait of Gibraltar region, reinforcing the picture of a species whose European presence is written and rewritten each year by the weather rather than sustained by local reproduction. Whether that balance might shift under a warming, drying climate is an open question. Ongoing aridification of southern Iberia could eventually create conditions suitable for permanent colonisation by desert-adapted insects, a possibility the authors highlight as reason for continued monitoring.</p>
<p>For now, A. herzogi stands as an elegant case study in atmospheric connectivity, showing how the Sahara&#8217;s edges and Europe&#8217;s southern coast are linked by invisible aerial highways. Its recurring guest appearances, clustered in space, punctuated in time, tied to southerly winds and genetically indistinguishable from moths thousands of kilometres away, demonstrate that a rising tally of records does not automatically mean a species is conquering new ground. Sometimes, as with this snow-white-winged wanderer from the desert, the northward march of a warming world is still just a matter of catching the right wind.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Wind-assisted immigration and failed establishment of the desert moth Agrotis herzogi in the Iberian-Balearic area</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Peripheral presence or transient colonist? Distribution, phenology and exploratory inferences about the origin of Agrotis herzogi Rebel, 1911 ( Lepidoptera , Noctuidae ) in the Iberian-Balearic area</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Yela, J. L., Marabuto, E., Domínguez, L. A., Grundy, D., Guerrero, J. J., Knapp, S., Olvera, M., Ranki, T., &amp; Ortiz, A. S. (2026). Peripheral presence or transient colonist? Distribution, phenology and exploratory inferences about the origin of Agrotis herzogi Rebel, 1911 (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in the Iberian-Balearic area. <em>Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 73</em>(1), 275-288. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.73.189021" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.73.189021</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.73.189021" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3897/dez.73.189021</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Agrotis herzogi, Noctuidae, moth migration, Iberian Peninsula, Strait of Gibraltar, wind-assisted dispersal, North Africa, DNA barcoding, COI, phenology, climate change, vagrancy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">287654</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lodgepole pine shows weak self-regeneration and limited spread in Latvia, study finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/lodgepole-pine-shows-weak-self-regeneration-and-limited-spread-in-latvia-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patricia Pace]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 18:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browsing damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conifer invasion in Baltic region]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[differences in lodgepole pine invasion patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early-stage conifer invasion dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of seed dispersal distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental factors affecting pine spread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest regeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hemiboreal forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of ungulate browsing on lodgepole pine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive conifer management challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive species in Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lodgepole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lodgepole pine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lodgepole pine invasion risk in Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lodgepole pine reproductive traits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NeoBiota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-native conifers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinus contorta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seed dispersal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seed dispersal limitations in Latvia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-regeneration of Pinus contorta]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=287638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A field survey of Latvian lodgepole pine plantations finds sparse self-regeneration, short dispersal distances, and heavy browsing damage, indicating low current invasion risk.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta), one of the most widely planted conifers in the world and a species with a notorious record of invasion in places like New Zealand, Iceland, and Patagonia, appears to be struggling to reproduce on its own in Latvia. A new field survey of nearly all seed-producing lodgepole pine plantations in the country has found that self-regeneration is sparse, seedling dispersal is short-ranged, and heavy browsing by ungulates is clipping back much of what does manage to establish. The findings, published in the journal NeoBiota, suggest that the invasion risk posed by the species in the Baltic region is currently low, though the authors caution that the early phase of conifer invasions is often deceptively quiet.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>The quiet performance of lodgepole pine in Latvia stands in sharp contrast to the species&#8217; reputation elsewhere, and the reasons for that contrast illuminate how invasion biology actually unfolds on the ground. An invasion is not a property of a species alone; it emerges from the interaction between the species&#8217; traits and the receiving environment. Lodgepole pine carries a formidable suite of traits: it begins producing seed at an early age, its small winged seeds travel readily on wind, it masts frequently, and its juveniles grow quickly. In theory, these are exactly the attributes that allow a tree to colonize open ground rapidly. Yet in Latvia, those attributes appear to be running into a wall of local resistance, and the study&#8217;s findings about canopy openings, bare soil, competition, and browsing describe the components of that wall.</p>
<p>The browsing signal deserves particular attention. Nearly a quarter of seedlings taller than 30 centimeters showed high browsing damage, and the authors identified this as a particularly important factor limiting regeneration. Across much of Europe, ungulate populations—roe deer, red deer, and increasingly moose—have reached densities that shape forest regeneration far beyond what would have been typical under historical predation regimes. For a species attempting to establish outside plantation boundaries, where seedlings lack any protection, the first decade of life is a gauntlet. Native Scots pine and Norway spruce seedlings face the same pressure, but they benefit from being recognized targets of active forest management, including protection measures and hunting regimes calibrated to their needs. A scattered, low-density recruit of an introduced species receives no such assistance, making ungulate browsing a disproportionately effective filter on non-native regeneration.</p>
<p>The finding that seedling density within plantations and in their immediate surroundings was essentially identical—roughly 240 versus 234 seedlings per hectare—suggests that once seed disperses beyond the canopy edge, establishment conditions rather than seed availability become the limiting factor. If seed rain were the bottleneck, densities would decline steeply with distance from the parent stand. Instead, the near-uniform density up to 90 meters implies that microsite availability, germination substrate, and post-germination survival are doing the sorting. This pattern is consistent with what invasion ecologists call recruitment limitation: a species may produce abundant seed, but without safe sites—bare mineral soil, gaps in the ground vegetation, appropriate moisture and light—those seeds rarely translate into established juveniles.</p>
<p>The age structure of the Latvian plantations is another crucial piece of context. Most of the studied stands were between 28 and 47 years old, with only a single 87-year-old stand representing the older end of the distribution. The most distant seedling recorded was found at 89 meters, a modest figure compared with the 760-meter spread documented in Iceland over six decades. The Latvian authors themselves note that the young age of the plantations may have contributed to lower propagule pressure on the surrounding landscape. This is a recurring theme in conifer invasion dynamics: the lag phase. In New Zealand, the invasion of lodgepole pine proceeded gradually, with initially low self-regeneration that accelerated as plantations matured and accumulated seed sources. Iceland&#8217;s experience followed a similar trajectory, with the first seedlings appearing 26 years after plantation establishment, after which the occupied area expanded thirtyfold over the following decades. The Latvian plantations may simply not yet have reached the stage at which propagule pressure overwhelms local resistance.</p>
<p>This lag-phase dynamic has practical consequences for how the findings should be interpreted. A low invasion risk measured today is not a forecast for 2050. The Latvian plantations established in 1979 to 1981, using seed material from various Canadian and American provenances in cooperation with Sweden, are now entering the age at which seed production becomes substantial and masting events become more consequential. If climate change extends the growing season in the Baltic region—as it already has, by an estimated six to fourteen days over the last century—and if late spring frosts that currently threaten newly germinated seedlings become less reliably lethal, the biotic and abiotic filters constraining regeneration could weaken simultaneously. The authors&#8217; call for continued monitoring of dispersal reflects this understanding: the current snapshot is reassuring, but the trajectory matters more than the snapshot.</p>
<p>The comparison with Sweden is instructive because Sweden represents the closest analogue in both climate and management history. Swedish plantations, covering roughly 520,000 hectares, have been monitored for self-regeneration, and 53 percent of plantations older than 25 years contain lodgepole pine seedlings spreading up to 15 meters outside their boundaries at low densities of 62 to 221 seedlings per hectare. The Latvian figures—45 percent of plantations containing regeneration, densities in the low hundreds per hectare, and dispersal up to 89 meters—are broadly consistent with the Swedish picture, though the Latvian dispersal distances are somewhat greater. Sweden nonetheless lists the species as invasive pre-emptively, a regulatory stance that reflects concern about what might happen as plantations age and propagate rather than what has been observed so far. Latvia&#8217;s situation, with only about 40 hectares of lodgepole pine stands in the entire country, is orders of magnitude smaller in scale, which itself constrains the total seed output available for colonization.</p>
<p>The ecological stakes of a potential future invasion are not trivial. Where lodgepole pine has naturalized aggressively, its impacts extend beyond simple displacement of native vegetation. In Patagonia, dense lodgepole pine stands have altered microenvironmental conditions and reduced plant diversity beneath their canopies. In Iceland, the species has displaced native habitat in treeless ecosystems such as steppes and tundra, where no native conifer exists to compete for the same niche. There is also a subtler legacy effect: when invasive pines are removed, the altered chemical composition and biota of the soil they leave behind can facilitate the spread of other non-native species, creating a cascade in which the first invader paves the way for successors. In the hemiboreal forests of Latvia, where conifers and broadleaves already mix at stand and landscape scales, a conifer that regenerates densely in canopy gaps could shift successional pathways in ways that reduce structural diversity and alter vegetation dynamics—effects that remain poorly documented in Northern Europe precisely because large-scale assessments of self-regeneration have been lacking.</p>
<p>The site properties identified as constraining regeneration also offer a window into what a future invasion would require. The absence of large canopy openings and bare soil, together with competition from established ground vegetation, emerged as key factors limiting seedling establishment. This means that the very disturbances that forest managers often create deliberately—clearcuts, soil scarification, thinning—could act as invasion gateways if lodgepole pine seed sources were nearby. Fire, which plays a prominent role in the species&#8217; native ecology and in its invasion history in the Southern Hemisphere, is rare in the Latvian landscape, but windthrow and other abiotic disturbances create comparable opportunities. The interaction between management practice and invasion risk is therefore not hypothetical: decisions about how much bare soil to expose near lodgepole pine plantations will directly influence whether the current low regeneration densities persist.</p>
<p>It is worth noting that the Latvian plantations themselves carry a biological complication. Most consisted of Pinus contorta var. latifolia, likely representing two provenances, but three plantations contained material from 27 provinces across Canada and the United States. Provenance mixing can influence both adaptive capacity and reproductive behavior, and the authors&#8217; hypothesis that biotic constraints would keep natural regeneration slow was framed against this genetic backdrop. The fact that up to 30 percent of canopy trees in six plantations had died from fungal infections adds another layer: disease pressure, presumably from pathogens native to Europe that the introduced pines had not evolved defenses against, is itself a form of biotic resistance operating on the mature trees, reducing both seed production and the aesthetic and economic appeal that motivated the original plantings.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the Latvian study contributes a data point from a region where lodgepole pine&#8217;s trajectory remains genuinely uncertain. The species is not yet considered naturalized in Poland despite more than 160 years of presence, and it is not reported as invasive in France despite widespread introduction. Yet it has naturalized in Great Britain, Ireland, and European Russia, and it has transformed landscapes in Iceland. The difference between these outcomes lies in the details of local conditions—disturbance regimes, browsing pressure, climate, soil, and the sheer scale of planting. Latvia&#8217;s current picture, with sparse regeneration, short dispersal, and heavy browsing damage, places it closer to the Swedish and Polish end of the spectrum than to the Icelandic one. Whether it stays there will depend on factors that are still in motion: the maturation of existing plantations, the trajectory of ungulate populations, the frequency of canopy-opening disturbances, and the pace of climatic change in the Baltic region. The study&#8217;s value lies not in declaring the question settled but in establishing a rigorous baseline against which future monitoring can measure change.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Self-regeneration and dispersal of the introduced lodgepole pine in Latvian forests</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta Doug.) shows low self-regeneration and dispersal in Latvia</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta Doug.) shows low self-regeneration and dispersal in Latvia. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.108.200368" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.108.200368</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.108.200368" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3897/neobiota.108.200368</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> lodgepole pine, Pinus contorta, invasive species, Latvia, forest regeneration, seed dispersal, browsing damage, hemiboreal forests, non-native conifers, NeoBiota, Lodgepole, pine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">287638</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
