<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>International Journal of Oral Science &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/international-journal-of-oral-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:06:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Touch-Sensing Piezo Channels Found to Steer the Cells That Build Our Teeth</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/touch-sensing-piezo-channels-found-to-steer-the-cells-that-build-our-teeth/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular signaling in tooth germ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conditional knockout mice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dental pulp and odontoblast function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dentin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dentin defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic regulation of tooth development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of mechanical forces on dental cell behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Journal of Oral Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ion channels in tissue engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanical sensing in tooth mineralization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanobiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanobiology of dentin formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanosensitive ion channels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanosensitive ion channels in oral health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanotransduction in dental tissue formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[odontoblasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piezo channels as therapeutic targets in dentistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piezo channels in tooth development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piezo1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piezo2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of Piezo1 and Piezo2 in odontogenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tooth development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wnt signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wnt10a]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=235266</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers at the University of Maryland Baltimore have shown that the mechanosensitive ion channels Piezo1 and Piezo2 drive the terminal differentiation of odontoblasts into dentin-forming cells by modulating Wnt signaling, a finding that could inform therapies for dentin defects.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every tooth in the human mouth is a monument to a remarkably precise sequence of biological events. The hard outer enamel arises from the epithelial component of the embryonic tooth germ, while the underlying mesenchymal tissue gives rise to the dental pulp, the soft core of blood vessels and nerves that keeps the tooth alive. Wrapped around that pulp sits a layer of specialized cells called odontoblasts, whose entire adult purpose is to secrete the organic matrix that mineralizes into dentin, the calcified tissue that makes up the bulk of every tooth. Scientists have long understood that this choreography is written in the genome, but a growing body of evidence shows that mechanical forces, the physical pushes and pulls experienced by developing tissues, also help direct the process. A new study from the University of Maryland Baltimore now reveals, at the level of individual genes and signaling molecules, how two of the body&#8217;s most famous mechanical sensors shape the way teeth are built.</p>
<p>The sensors in question are Piezo1 and Piezo2, ion channels that open in response to mechanical stimulation and allow calcium and other charged particles to flood into cells. Since their discovery, Piezo channels have been implicated in everything from the sense of touch to blood pressure regulation, and previous work had shown that they are expressed in tooth-forming cells and participate in postnatal tooth development. What remained murky was their precise role in odontoblast differentiation, the process by which progenitor cells in the outermost layer of the dental pulp transform into mature, dentin-secreting odontoblasts. That gap in knowledge mattered, because dentin formation is the foundation of tooth structure, and defects in odontoblast maturation can produce structurally weakened teeth that are vulnerable throughout life.</p>
<p>To close that gap, a research group led by Professor Man-Kyo Chung and Dr. Xuguang Nie of the University of Maryland Baltimore turned to genetic mouse models in which the Piezo genes could be selectively deleted. Their findings, published in Volume 18, Article number 61 of the International Journal of Oral Science on 10 September 2026, provide the first in vivo demonstration that Piezo channels drive the terminal differentiation of odontoblasts, and they identify the Wnt signaling pathway as the molecular bridge between mechanical sensing and tooth formation. The work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant R35 DE030045, with additional support to researcher Kelley Huang through the R25 DE32530 Maryland Program in Dental Research Experience.</p>
<p>Explaining why the team took this approach, Professor Chung noted that although earlier studies had reported that Piezo1 and Piezo2 are expressed in tooth-forming cells, their roles in tooth development in living animals remained poorly understood. By using a conditional knockout strategy, the researchers could remove the genes at specific times and places rather than eliminating them throughout the embryo, which allowed them to focus on the cells that actually build teeth. The Wnt1-Cre2 system they employed deletes target genes specifically in cells of neural crest origin, a lineage that includes odontoblasts, giving the team a precise genetic scalpel for the job.</p>
<p>The first experiments produced a surprise. When the researchers generated mice lacking either Piezo1 or Piezo2 alone in these neural crest-derived cells, tooth development proceeded essentially normally. This result pointed to a functional redundancy between the two channels, a phenomenon that has been documented in many other tissues and biological processes, where one channel can compensate for the loss of its sibling. To test that idea, the team engineered mice lacking both genes simultaneously, creating the Piezo1/Piezo2 double knockout model that would become the centerpiece of the study.</p>
<p>At the embryonic stage, the double knockout mice still showed no obvious defects in tooth development, suggesting that the earliest steps of tooth patterning do not depend on these mechanosensitive channels. But the picture changed dramatically at birth. Newborn double knockout mice exhibited a striking reduction in odontoblast height, a hallmark of immature odontoblasts, along with decreased expression of the key proteins that define odontoblast differentiation: dentin sialophosphoprotein, known as Dspp, alkaline phosphatase, or Alpl, and collagen type 1, or Col1a1. Together, these molecular and cellular changes signaled a clear impairment of odontoblast maturation. The double knockout animals did not survive beyond the first day after birth, likely reflecting the broader importance of Piezo channels in craniofacial and systemic development, but in the tissue that could be examined at this most advanced stage of survival, dentin matrix was present only in some areas, and overall tooth development was atypical.</p>
<p>With a differentiation defect firmly established, the researchers turned to the question of mechanism. Wnt signaling is one of the master regulators of tooth development, controlling multiple stages from initiation to maturation, and previous studies had reported correlations between Wnt signaling and Piezo1 activity in a variety of biological contexts. That made the Wnt pathway an obvious suspect. The team therefore measured the expression of Wnt10a and β-catenin, two central components of the canonical Wnt signaling cascade that operates during odontoblast differentiation. In the double knockout mice, both factors were significantly downregulated, and the suppression extended downstream as well: Axin1, a known target of β-catenin signaling, was also reduced. The mechanical sensors, it appeared, were feeding directly into one of developmental biology&#8217;s most important signaling networks.</p>
<p>The most compelling evidence came from a rescue experiment. When the researchers supplied exogenous Wnt10a to the deficient mice, odontoblast differentiation and Wnt signaling were partially restored, demonstrating that the loss of Wnt activity was not merely a side effect of the differentiation failure but a causal link in the chain. In a complementary approach, the team treated pregnant wild-type mice with Yoda1, a pharmacological activator of Piezo1, and observed increased odontoblast differentiation, increased matrix deposition, and elevated expression of Wnt10a and β-catenin in the embryos. In other words, turning up the mechanical signal turned up the tooth-building program. Taken together, these experiments show that Piezo1 and Piezo2 contribute to the terminal differentiation of odontoblasts, at least in part, by modulating canonical Wnt signaling.</p>
<p>The implications of the work extend beyond basic developmental biology. Dentin malformations and inherited dentin defects, such as those seen in genetic conditions affecting dentin sialophosphoprotein and related pathways, remain difficult to treat because dentin, unlike many other tissues, cannot regenerate once the odontoblasts that formed it are lost or dysfunctional. Dr. Nie emphasized the translational potential of the findings, remarking that this is the first study to reveal the roles of Piezo1 and Piezo2 in odontoblast differentiation in an in vivo model, and that the molecular links between the Piezo channels and Wnt signaling could potentially be harnessed to develop therapeutic strategies for dentin malformations or inherited dentin defects. If pharmacological manipulation of Piezo channels, as the Yoda1 experiment suggests, can enhance odontoblast maturation and matrix deposition, similar approaches might one day strengthen dentin formation in patients with congenital tooth defects or even support regenerative dental therapies.</p>
<p>The study also adds an important chapter to the rapidly expanding field of mechanobiology, the discipline that explores how physical forces influence gene expression and cell fate. The idea that a developing tooth needs to sense its mechanical environment in order to mineralize properly is a vivid illustration of how deeply embedded mechanical signaling is in embryonic development. Odontoblasts, after all, will spend their entire postnatal lives as mechanosensitive sentinels of the tooth, detecting stimuli that travel through dentin and orchestrating responses such as tertiary dentin formation. The new findings suggest that this mechanical sensitivity is not a late addition to the odontoblast toolkit but a fundamental requirement for the cells to reach their mature, dentin-forming state in the first place. As researchers continue to map the intersections between ion channels, mechanical forces, and developmental signaling pathways, the humble tooth is proving to be a powerful model for understanding how the body translates physical cues into biological structure, one calcified matrix molecule at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The role of mechanosensitive Piezo1 and Piezo2 ion channels in odontoblast differentiation and dentin formation during tooth development</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mechanosensitive ion channels regulate tooth development</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Mechanosensitive ion channels regulate tooth development. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1146019" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Piezo1, Piezo2, odontoblasts, dentin, tooth development, Wnt signaling, mechanosensitive ion channels, mechanobiology, conditional knockout mice, International Journal of Oral Science, dentin defects, Wnt10a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">235266</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiny Protein Helix Found to Guide the Cells That Build Tooth Enamel</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/tiny-protein-helix-found-to-guide-the-cells-that-build-tooth-enamel/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 13:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ameloblast cell differentiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ameloblast polarization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ameloblastin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ameloblasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amelogenesis imperfecta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomineralization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomolecular mechanisms in enamel formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell polarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular architecture in tooth development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular guidance in biomineralization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR-Cas9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enamel formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enamel microstructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enamel prism organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enamel tissue engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Journal of Oral Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular cues in enamel structuring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein helices in tissue development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein structures guiding cell behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RhoA-ROCK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TGF-beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tooth enamel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tooth enamel formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wnt signaling]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=194811</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A short membrane-binding helix within the enamel protein ameloblastin has been shown to direct the polarity of enamel-forming cells and the prismatic architecture of mature tooth enamel.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tooth enamel is the hardest material the human body ever makes, and it has to last a lifetime. From the outside, a finished tooth presents a deceptively simple appearance: a smooth, glassy, exceptionally durable surface engineered to withstand decades of chewing, grinding, and exposure to acids. Yet beneath that unassuming exterior lies one of the most intricately organized structures in biology. Under the microscope, mammalian enamel resolves into tightly ordered bundles called prisms, or rods, separated by inter-prismatic regions, and it is this hidden architecture that gives enamel its remarkable mechanical performance. The cells responsible for laying down this material are called ameloblasts, elongated and highly polarized epithelial cells that work in precisely coordinated rows as the tooth develops. Scientists have understood for many years that the shape and orientation of ameloblasts are intimately connected to the final architecture of the enamel they secrete. What has remained far less clear is the molecular cue that instructs these cells to become so precisely polarized in the first place, and how that instruction is translated into the prismatic pattern of the mature tissue.</p>
<p>A new study from the laboratory of Professor Janet Moradian-Oldak at the University of Southern California points to a surprisingly small piece of one protein as a critical part of the answer. The work, published in Volume 18 of the International Journal of Oral Science on August 20, 2026, focuses on ameloblastin, or Ambn, the second most abundant extracellular matrix protein in developing enamel matrix. Rather than examining the protein as a whole, the team zeroed in on a very short segment: an amphipathic helix, or AH motif, a stretch of amino acids that folds into a helix with one hydrophobic face and one hydrophilic face. This dual character allows such motifs to bind to cell membranes, physically linking the surrounding enamel matrix to the surfaces of the cells that are building it. The evolutionary pressure on this little segment appears to be intense. Within the eleven-amino-acid region targeted in the study, nine residues were identical across mouse, pig, and human ameloblastin, a degree of conservation that made the motif a compelling candidate for a mechanism connecting matrix and cell.</p>
<p>To test what this motif actually does in a living animal, the researchers turned to CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. They generated mice in which the hydrophobic residues spanning amino acids Lys76 to Pro86 of the AH motif were deleted, removing the membrane-facing portion of the helix while leaving the rest of the protein intact. Before moving to the animal model, the team took care to verify that the mutation had not simply destroyed ameloblastin as a molecule. Recombinant mutant protein could still self-assemble into larger structures, although the assembly was less uniform than that of the wild-type protein. Crucially, the mutant protein&#8217;s ability to interact with ameloblast-lineage cells was markedly reduced. In other words, the edit selectively weakened the specific cell-binding function the investigators wanted to interrogate, while largely sparing the protein&#8217;s other biochemical properties. &#8216;Using this model, we reinforce the concept of multifunctionality of Ambn, with a selective disruption of Ambn–ameloblast interactions,&#8217; said Professor Moradian-Oldak, underscoring that a single matrix protein can carry separable duties encoded in different structural domains.</p>
<p>When the mutant mice grew up, their teeth told a strikingly nuanced story. Homozygous mutant animals formed enamel that reached essentially normal thickness, so by the crude measure of quantity, enamel formation seemed intact. The quality of the material, however, was another matter entirely. Micro-computed X-ray tomography revealed delayed secretory and maturation stages of enamel development, slower densification over time, and a final mature enamel density of only about seventy percent of the wild-type plateau. Scanning electron microscopy showed a rough, sandpaper-like surface and a dramatic loss of the usual rod-and-interrod organization that defines healthy enamel. The mineral was there, but its internal architecture was not. This clean split between thickness and quality carries real biological weight. The expression levels of the major enamel matrix genes, AmelX and Amelotin-related AmelX and Enam, remained normal in the mutants, which helps explain why the overall amount of enamel could still be deposited. The AH motif appears to perform something far more specific than bulk production: it organizes the cell polarity and matrix patterning needed to convert deposited enamel into a densely mineralized, prismatic material.</p>
<p>Looking directly at the cells confirmed the depth of the disruption. Ameloblasts in the mutant mice were nineteen to twenty-three percent shorter than normal, a measurable change in the geometry of the enamel-forming layer. The Golgi apparatus, which in healthy ameloblasts is positioned in an orderly way to support the directional secretion of enamel matrix, showed disturbed positioning. Polarity proteins such as Pard3 and claudin-1, which normally help define the apical and basolateral identity of these highly asymmetric cells, were mislocalized. Ameloblastin itself lost its characteristic localization along the distal cell membrane and along Tomes&#8217; processes, the specialized extensions of ameloblasts that guide enamel rod formation and which were rudimentary in the mutant animals. Together, these observations sketch a coherent mechanism: the amphipathic helix anchors ameloblastin to the cell surface, and that anchoring is required to establish and maintain the cellular polarity on which prismatic enamel depends.</p>
<p>The polarity defects in the mutants were mirrored by changes in cell signaling. Beta-catenin, a central transducer of the Wnt signaling pathway, shifted into the nucleus, where it can alter gene expression programs governing cell fate and organization. Phosphorylated Smad2/3, a readout of TGF-beta pathway activity, showed increased nuclear localization as well. Meanwhile, the intensity of RhoA signaling, a key regulator of the cytoskeleton and of cell shape, was reduced. Taken together, these alterations point to the possible involvement of the Wnt, TGF-beta, and RhoA-ROCK pathways in mediating the effects of the ameloblastin amphipathic helix on ameloblast organization. The matrix, in this view, is not merely a passive product of the cells; it actively talks back to them, and the AH motif appears to be one of the molecular languages of that conversation.</p>
<p>One of the most revealing aspects of the study came from the heterozygous mice, which carried only one copies of the disrupted allele and still produced normal enamel mineral density. Despite that apparently normal bulk mineralization, these animals showed disrupted prism-interprism architecture, altered membrane interaction, and defects in cell polarity. The finding suggests that the AH motif has a specific functional role that goes beyond simple protein dosage. Half the normal complement of functional cell-binding motif is enough to compromise the organization of enamel without changing its quantity, which argues that the motif acts as a dedicated architectural signal rather than as a generic contributor to matrix volume. This kind of separation of functions within a single protein segment is exactly what one might expect from a strongly conserved motif that has been optimized by evolution for a narrow but essential task.</p>
<p>The research also has a direct and clinically meaningful connection to hereditary enamel disease. Variants in the human AMBN gene are associated with amelogenesis imperfecta, a group of inherited conditions in which enamel forms abnormally or fails to form properly, often leading to sensitive, discolored, or structurally weak teeth. A previously reported truncation within the AH-motif region of the protein has been linked to contrasting clinical phenotypes and inheritance patterns, and the new mouse model now provides an experimental framework for understanding why damage to this tiny region of the protein can have such outsized consequences. &#8216;Our new mouse model gives researchers a powerful way to uncover how defects in this tiny region of Ambn disrupt normal enamel development. Although our findings do not yet translate into a treatment, they highlight promising biological targets for future approaches to preventing or repairing enamel defects,&#8217; concluded Professor Moradian-Oldak.</p>
<p>Because human enamel, unlike bone, cannot regenerate or remodel itself once it is formed, the biology of enamel formation carries unusually high stakes for dentistry. Every strategy for preventing caries, repairing early lesions, or engineering bioinspired replacement materials ultimately depends on understanding how the original tissue was built. By demonstrating that an eleven-amino-acid membrane-binding helix in ameloblastin is sufficient to determine whether enamel becomes a densely mineralized, prismatic material or a structurally inferior substitute, the USC team has identified a molecular handle on one of the most fundamental steps in tooth development. The amphipathic helix joins a growing list of matrix-derived signals that sculpt tissue architecture by organizing the cells that build it. For the field of enamel biomineralization, and for the long-term goal of growing or regenerating enamel-like materials in the clinic, the message of this study is clear: sometimes the most important instructions come from the smallest parts of the blueprint.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Role of the ameloblastin amphipathic helix motif in ameloblast polarity and prismatic enamel formation</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Ameloblastin amphipathic helix helps tooth-building cells create enamel&#x27;s hidden architecture</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ameloblastin amphipathic helix helps tooth-building cells create enamel&#x27;s hidden architecture. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1143674" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> ameloblastin, ameloblasts, tooth enamel, enamel formation, amelogenesis imperfecta, CRISPR-Cas9, cell polarity, biomineralization, Wnt signaling, TGF-beta, RhoA-ROCK, International Journal of Oral Science</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">194811</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
