<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>interfacial water &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/interfacial-water/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 20:32:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Water molecules found to gate the door on carbon dioxide electrolysis</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/water-molecules-found-to-gate-the-door-on-carbon-dioxide-electrolysis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 20:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 electrolysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversion of CO2 to fuels and chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper catalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper catalyst behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electrocatalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrocatalyst selectivity tuning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrolyser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen evolution suppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen-bond network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial CO2 electrolysis current densities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanistic insights into CO2 reduction reactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[membrane electrode assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multicarbon products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raman spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time electrolysis monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water gating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water molecule gating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water's active role in electrochemistry]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=277726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Operando Raman spectroscopy and molecular dynamics reveal that ordered interfacial water layers actively control CO2 reduction selectivity at industrial current densities.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Water, long treated as a passive backdrop in electrochemistry, has been caught actively controlling who gets to the electrode and who does not. In a study published in Nature Catalysis, researchers led by F. Pelayo García de Arquer of ICFO in Barcelona, working with Núria López&#8217;s computational group at ICIQ, have watched the carbon dioxide reduction reaction unfold in real time inside a working membrane electrode assembly, at current densities of up to one ampere per square centimetre, the regime that industrial CO2 electrolysers actually operate in. What they saw overturns the conventional picture: the ordered layer of water molecules hugging the copper catalyst behaves like a gatekeeper, determining whether carbon species can reach the interface or whether the current is wasted making hydrogen instead.</p>
<p>The stakes are high. Electrochemical CO2 reduction promises to convert captured carbon dioxide into valuable fuels and chemicals such as carbon monoxide, methane, ethylene and ethanol, offering a route to decarbonise chemical manufacturing and transport. Copper remains the most promising electrocatalyst for these products because its selectivity can be tuned, and specific facets and ensembles of copper atoms enable the carbon-carbon coupling steps that build multicarbon molecules. Yet decades of mechanistic studies have relied on idealised static surfaces and simplified adsorbate models, and the discrepancies between different in situ spectroscopy studies have persistently frustrated efforts to build a unified picture. Most past experiments were also performed at current densities far below those relevant to deployment, in cells whose stagnant electrolytes and non-uniform electric fields do not resemble a real electrolyser.</p>
<p>The Barcelona team tackled this problem on two fronts. First, they used a three-electrode open flow cell with 1 M potassium bicarbonate electrolyte, which supplies a continuous stream of CO2 and decouples thermodynamic driving forces from mass transport limits. Then they built a custom operando Raman spectroscopy platform integrated directly into a membrane electrode assembly, achieving optical access to the buried cathodic interface through the anion exchange membrane and the iridium oxide-coated titanium anode. This allowed them to record spectra during genuine continuous CO2 electrolysis across a broad range of current densities, all the way to one ampere per square centimetre, while product analysis proceeded in parallel through gas chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography.</p>
<p>The key to their analysis lies in how water organises itself at an electrified interface. Liquid water is best viewed as a continuously evolving, disordered hydrogen-bond network, but individual molecules can be classified phenomenologically by how many hydrogen bonds they make: tetrahedral water with four hydrogen bonds, trihedral water with three, and isolated free water. These populations shift with potential, current density, surface coverage and local ionic environment, and they can be quantified from the hydrogen-oxygen stretching band of the Raman spectrum. The researchers deconvoluted the stretching envelope into Gaussian components centred near 3,200 and 3,400 reciprocal centimetres for the four- and three-hydrogen-bond waters respectively, and tracked how these populations evolved as current was applied.</p>
<p>What emerged was a strikingly non-monotonic story. At rest, interfacial water sat in a random orientation with a dominant four-hydrogen-bond character. As current density rose toward 0.1 A per square centimetre, the three-hydrogen-bond fraction climbed from about 45 percent to 84 percent, with molecules flipping into an H-down orientation that aligns their hydrogens toward the negatively charged surface. This population of three-hydrogen-bond water turned out to be the primary proton source for CO2 reduction, and its rise coincided with growing selectivity toward multicarbon products. The four-hydrogen-bond fraction fell correspondingly, dipping to a minimum of about 16 percent. Between 0.2 and 0.4 A per square centimetre the picture shifted again, and beyond 0.4 A per square centimetre both water types flipped to H-down configurations as the increasingly strong interfacial electric field took over.</p>
<p>To understand why, the team turned to ab initio molecular dynamics simulations run on copper surfaces with varying coverages of potassium cations and adsorbed species. The simulations revealed a division of labour: adsorbed potassium ions act as hydrogen-bond breakers, dismantling the interfacial water network, whereas adsorbed hydroxide, carbon monoxide and carbonate species act as hydrogen-bond makers, extending and stiffening the network. Increasing the number of potassium cations in the double layer dropped the four-hydrogen-bond water fraction from 0.70 to 0.45, while adding hydroxide at that same cation coverage restored it to 0.73. This explained the experimental oscillation: as the potential grows more negative, anion coverage falls and cation concentration rises, disrupting water order, until the accumulation of polar adsorbates such as hydroxide and carbonate reorders the network once more, making the interfacial layer increasingly ice-like and rigid.</p>
<p>The coupling between water structure and reaction intermediates was mapped with two-dimensional correlated Raman spectroscopy, a technique that compares intensity fluctuations across many spectra to reveal which vibrational modes change together and in what order. The analysis traced a sequential pathway: adsorbed carbon monoxide forms first, shifting from a low-frequency to a high-frequency band; adsorbed hydroxide then appears and stabilises the high-frequency carbon monoxide species; and that intermediate converts into a carbonaceous intermediate implicated in carbon-carbon coupling. A strong positive correlation between the three-hydrogen-bond water signal and the high-frequency carbon monoxide band confirmed that interfacial water physically rearranges to accommodate and stabilise the species needed for multicarbon products.</p>
<p>Then came the gating mechanism itself. Beyond roughly 0.2 A per square centimetre, hydroxide generation falls behind its removal through the anion exchange membrane, carbonate accumulates, and the four-hydrogen-bond water fraction rebounds. This denser, more ordered water layer restricts access of carbon dioxide and carbon species to the interface while providing abundant protons for the competing hydrogen evolution reaction. A control experiment feeding argon instead of CO2 produced nearly 90 percent faradaic efficiency for hydrogen with a similar four-hydrogen-bond water content, confirming that the ordered water layer gates access to the catalyst surface regardless of which reactants are present. Electrochemical performance tracked the spectroscopy closely: carbon dioxide selectivity peaked, multicarbon selectivity reached 45 percent and the hydrogen efficiency bottomed out at 0.2 A per square centimetre, precisely where hydroxide coverage and three-hydrogen-bond water were maximal and carbonate and four-hydrogen-bond water were minimal.</p>
<p>The practical implications are considerable. If the interfacial hydrogen-bond network is a design variable rather than background noise, it can be engineered. The authors suggest that surface functionalisation with hydroxyl, amine, imidazole or sulfonate groups, hydrophobic terminations that modulate water orientation, tailored electrolytes that control cation concentration, and selective water-exchange membranes could all be used to hold the interface in the productive regime. Carbon monoxide reduction studies, which eliminate the carbonate signals that complicate spectroscopy, could refine the picture further, since surface-bound hydrogen donors and intermediates could then be tracked cleanly.</p>
<p>What makes the work resonate beyond electrochemistry is the demonstration that at industrial current densities, the hardest problems may not be about the catalyst at all, but about water management at a scale of a few molecular layers. The same molecules that deliver protons for synthesis can also cement themselves into a barrier that chokes off the reaction. Seeing that gate open and close, molecule by molecule, while the electrolyser runs, gives catalyst and system designers for the first time a molecular target to aim for: not merely a better copper surface, but a better-ordered dance of water above it.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Interfacial water structure and its role in gating CO2 electroreduction on copper catalysts at high current density</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Operando resolution of CO2 electrolysis interfaces at application-relevant current density reveals water gating</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Guha, A., Seemakurthi, R. R., Polesso, B., Haldar, P., Ram, R., Pinilla-Sánchez, A., Mondal, I., Kernan, D., López, N., &amp; García de Arquer, F. P. (2026). Operando resolution of CO2 electrolysis interfaces at application-relevant current density reveals water gating. <em>Nature Catalysis</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-026-01620-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-026-01620-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-026-01620-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41929-026-01620-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> CO2 reduction, electrocatalysis, copper catalyst, interfacial water, Raman spectroscopy, molecular dynamics, hydrogen evolution, membrane electrode assembly, hydrogen-bond network, multicarbon products, electrolyser, water gating</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">277726</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>DyME: A New Engine Automates Thousands of Protein Simulations for Molecular Design</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/dyme-a-new-engine-automates-thousands-of-protein-simulations-for-molecular-design/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 21:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomic-level protein interaction modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated molecular design tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[binding free energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational biology automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DyME molecular simulation engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-throughput mutagenesis platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-throughput screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large-scale protein mutation analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular dynamics simulation automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutagenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peptide design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein binding affinity modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protein Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein simulations automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein-protein interaction engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein-protein interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SH3 domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural bioinformatics automation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web-based molecular analysis platform]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=249741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have developed DyME, an open-source platform that automates high-throughput mutagenesis, molecular dynamics simulation, and comparative analysis of thousands of protein complexes to accelerate rational protein engineering.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proteins are picky conversationalists. They recognize partners through a few interfacial amino acids whose identities, orientations, and surrounding water molecules decide whether two molecules bind tightly, weakly, or not at all. Researchers have long wanted to tweak these molecular handshakes deliberately—strengthening an antibody&#8217;s grip on a target, steering a peptide ligand toward one kinase and away from its close relatives, or designing mimetics that fool a biological interaction. The physics needed to do this properly is known: molecular dynamics (MD) simulations track every atom and reveal how mutations reshape binding at atomic detail. The problem has been scale. Each mutation set demands its own prepared, solvated, simulated, and analyzed system, and comparing results across dozens or hundreds of runs has meant weeks of manual labor. A team at TU Dresden&#8217;s Structural Bioinformatics group, led by Pedro M. Guillem-Gloria, Gloria Ruiz-Gómez, and M. Teresa Pisabarro, now reports in PLOS Computational Biology an integrated platform called DyME—Dynamic Mutagenesis Engine—that automates the entire pipeline, from generating thousands of mutant structures to delivering interactive comparative analysis through a web browser.</p>
<p>The core insight behind DyME is that high-throughput mutagenesis has outpaced the software built around it. Existing automation tools each cover only fragments of the workflow. Earlier pipelines such as one described by Chiappori and colleagues in 2009, and the more recent MutateX, probe saturation mutagenesis using energy-minimized structures and the FoldX force field—but they skip dynamics entirely. MDFit automates MD simulations through Desmond but requires a manually pre-built ligand library and performs no automated mutagenesis. StreaMD can launch simulations from existing input structures and assist post-processing with GROMACS, yet it too leaves large gaps. Static structure-based methods, the authors note, struggle to capture the conformational complexity that governs biomolecular recognition, which is why MD remains the gold standard, especially now that GPUs make large macromolecular simulations fast enough to imagine running them by the thousand. DyME was built to fill the void: a single, cohesive platform covering preparation, mutagenesis, simulation, feature extraction, storage, and comparative exploration of up to several thousand molecular systems.</p>
<p>Technically, DyME is a distributed system whose architecture resembles a well-organized factory. A user begins by uploading the 3D coordinates of a protein–protein or protein–DNA complex, prepared with pdb4amber to enforce compatibility with the Amber file conventions that standardize the platform. A guided web wizard, reminiscent of OpenMM-Setup, then collects everything the simulation engine needs: solvation model, ionic neutralization strategy, periodic boundary conditions, temperature, statistical ensemble, step size, equilibration and production lengths. The user designates one molecule in the complex as the &#8220;mutable object&#8221; and selects &#8220;anchor points&#8221;—interfacial residues whose alteration will be probed. DyME analyzes inter-molecular contacts and proposes a tentative list of anchor points, which the user can freely edit. Because exploration at multiple positions can explode combinatorially, the platform offers &#8220;anchor point clustering,&#8221; grouping nearby or functionally related positions and enumerating all singlet, doublet, and triplet permutations within each cluster. Before launching, DyME estimates the total number of mutant permutations and the required GPU-hours, giving researchers a realistic budget at a glance.</p>
<p>Once a project is defined, the platform&#8217;s producer-consumer machinery takes over. MD nodes deployed on GPU servers periodically poll a central MongoDB database for mutant records marked &#8220;pending.&#8221; When an idle GPU card and a waiting mutant coincide, the node builds the mutant&#8217;s 3D structure with Modeller, treating each mutation as a small homology-modeling problem that resolves steric clashes, refines rotamers, adjusts the backbone, and minimizes energy. An embedded template generator then drives Amber&#8217;s tleap tool to solvate, neutralize, and produce the topology and coordinate files OpenMM requires. Notably, DyME splits topologies into separate files for the mutable and non-mutable objects with atom counts kept consistent across every mutant—a seemingly mundane detail that is essential for valid per-residue energy decomposition later. Simulations run asynchronously, one per GPU, with a Langevin middle integrator by default; status codes written back to the database prevent race conditions and let other nodes pick up completed work immediately.</p>
<p>The third phase belongs to the &#8220;Scavenger nodes.&#8221; For every finished trajectory, they extract a battery of features automatically: root-mean-square deviations, binding free energies computed with MMPBSA.py, pairwise and per-residue energy decompositions, inter-molecular contact frequencies, and—unusually for tools in this space—solvent information. A dedicated water-site mapping module characterizes the water molecules that linger at the binding interface, cataloguing which protein atoms they contact and how long they reside there. Interfacial waters are far more than passive fillers; they mediate recognition and can determine specificity, yet they are notoriously difficult to track across large simulation sets. All scavenged data flows into the central database, where MongoDB&#8217;s native aggregation pipelines perform correlational queries across millions of records at speeds that make comparing hundreds of simulations genuinely interactive rather than an overnight batch job.</p>
<p>The front end—DyME&#8217;s Toolbox for Comparative Analysis—is where the platform becomes a design instrument. The Mutant Explorer presents an interactive ranked table of every simulated variant, color-graded from most favorable to least favorable binding free energy relative to the wild type, alongside statistical summaries including percentiles of the energy distribution. Double-clicking any mutant loads its data into context-aware widgets: a 3D explorer that superposes mutant structures on the wild type and renders interfacial water-sites as spheres sized by residence time, an RMSD plot for stability checks, per-residue energy bar charts at anchor points, and a pairwise contact heat map that reveals mutant-specific interactions at a glance. An Interactive Energy Explorer can even display energetic contributions from the perspective of either binding partner, exposing whether a mutation creates new interaction sites on the counterpart molecule. Filters allow users to demand combinations of up to three point mutations; if no simulated mutant matches the criteria, DyME can add the missing combination to the library and queue it for simulation on the fly.</p>
<p>Two widgets deserve special mention because they target the practical goals of engineering. The Water Site Explorer, in one click, lists interfacial water-sites, the residues and atoms they bridge, and the combined residence times of the waters involved—turning an analysis that typically demands custom scripting into an exploratory click-through. The Specificity Finder addresses the classic trade-off in molecular recognition: designing a binder that is stronger for one receptor but weaker for another. It compares two DyME projects that share the same mutable ligand but differ in receptor, and it surfaces up to fifty mutants common to both, ranked by the differential effect. In the published demonstration, a triplet mutation (M4Y, P5S, L8P) raised predicted affinity for one protein receptor from −27.5 to −31.8 kilocalories per mole while simultaneously weakening it for another from −26 to −16.8—an unambiguous specificity switch identified without manual data wrangling.</p>
<p>To validate the platform, the team turned to a classic benchmark in protein mimicry: the recognition of proline-rich peptides by SH3 domains, small signaling modules that bind poly-proline II motifs. The peptide 3 bp-1 (APTMPPPLPP) binds the SH3 domains of the Abl and Fyn tyrosine kinases with identical low affinity (a dissociation constant of 34 micromolar), and earlier structure-based design work had produced the peptide p41 (APSYSPPPPP), which showed a twenty-fold affinity increase for Abl-SH3 and a ten-fold decrease for Fyn-SH3. Replicating that mutagenesis rationale in DyME—defining every position of 3 bp-1 as an anchor point—the simulated binding free energies correlated with the experimentally reported Kd values, and the water-site mapping recapitulated water-mediated interactions that had been identified experimentally at the Abl and Fyn SH3 interfaces. The test data, including raw simulation inputs and outputs, has been deposited on Zenodo for community scrutiny.</p>
<p>DyME is open source, distributed under Docker and Apptainer containers, and scales horizontally by adding worker nodes to whatever computational infrastructure a lab already possesses. It even accepts non-standard molecular constituents such as synthetic amino acids through custom Amber libraries, widening its reach into chemical biology and peptidomimetic design. The authors frame it as a foundation for something larger: coupling large-scale MD with machine learning to rapidly identify and predict exploitable recognition features. If the bottleneck in computational protein engineering has been the fragmentation of tools across every step of a simulation campaign, DyME&#8217;s message is that the workflow can now be treated as a single, queryable dataset—one in which the question &#8220;which mutation gives me the binding profile I want?&#8221; becomes an interactive query rather than a research project of its own.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A molecular dynamics software platform for high-throughput mutagenesis and protein recognition engineering</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> DyME: An MD-based engine exploiting HTP mutagenesis for protein engineering and recognition mimicry</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Guillem-Gloria, P. M., Ruiz-Gómez, G., &amp; Pisabarro, M. T. (2026). DyME: An MD-based engine exploiting HTP mutagenesis for protein engineering and recognition mimicry. <em>PLOS Computational Biology, 22</em>(10), e1014221. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014221" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014221</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014221" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014221</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> molecular dynamics, protein engineering, mutagenesis, protein-protein interactions, binding free energy, open-source software, high-throughput screening, SH3 domains, peptide design, interfacial water, molecular recognition, computational biology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">249741</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Watch the Electrical Double Layer Collapse in Real Time During Hydrogen Evolution</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/scientists-watch-the-electrical-double-layer-collapse-in-real-time-during-hydrogen-evolution/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced visualization of electrochemical processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electric field intensification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical double layer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical double layer dynamics during hydrogen evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electrocatalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical reaction mechanisms at platinum electrodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrode-electrolyte interface in renewable energy systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrolyte design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[far-from-equilibrium dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen evolution reaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen evolution reaction in acidic electrolytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen production catalysis and electrode surface interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of electric fields on molecular transformations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insights into electrolysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine-learning molecular dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanometer-scale study of electrical double layer collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-equilibrium behavior of electrical double layer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platinum electrode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potassium cations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time molecular imaging of electrochemical reactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time observation of electrochemical interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIRAS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=226826</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A combined spectroscopy and machine-learning simulation study has captured the electrical double layer restructuring in real time during hydrogen evolution, revealing a two-phase contraction that intensifies local electric fields and irreversibly reorders interfacial water.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every electrochemical reaction that powers a fuel cell, splits water, or converts carbon dioxide into fuels takes place across an invisible frontier just a few molecules thick: the electrical double layer, or EDL. This nanometre-scale region, where a charged electrode surface meets an electrolyte solution, hosts electric fields strong enough to reshape molecules and dictate the speed of chemical transformations. Yet despite more than a century of study, the double layer has been understood almost exclusively through models built for calm, equilibrium conditions. A team of researchers in China and Germany has now captured, in real time and at the molecular level, what happens to this layer when a real reaction is running far from equilibrium, and the picture they reveal is strikingly different from the textbook version.</p>
<p>The study, published in Nature by Xiao-Yu Li, Yu-Chen Cai and colleagues from Xiamen University, the Fujian Institute of Research on the Structure of Matter, Forschungszentrum Jülich and RWTH Aachen University, focused on the hydrogen evolution reaction, the cathodic half of water electrolysis, taking place on platinum electrodes in acidic electrolyte containing potassium ions. Platinum is the benchmark catalyst for hydrogen production, and the hydrogen evolution reaction is among the fastest electrochemical processes known, which makes it an ideal testing ground for probing how a double layer behaves when charge is being transferred rapidly rather than sitting at rest.</p>
<p>Classical descriptions of the double layer, from the Gouy–Chapman diffuse-layer model of 1910 and 1913 through Stern&#8217;s compact-layer refinement and Grahame&#8217;s later synthesis, all share a common assumption: the interface is at equilibrium and nothing reactive is happening. Under those conditions, the arrangement of ions and water molecules near the electrode adjusts smoothly and reversibly as the potential changes. But in a working electrolyser, the electrode is pumping charge across the interface at high current densities, and the molecular crowd at the surface must reorganize continuously while reactions consume and produce species. Whether the classical framework survives those conditions has been an open question, largely because the tools to watch the interface directly under such demanding conditions simply did not exist.</p>
<p>The researchers attacked the problem from two directions at once. On the experimental side, they fabricated chemically stable nanostructured platinum film electrodes using a square-wave electrodeposition method that produces uniform nanoparticles with an unusually large infrared enhancement factor. This substrate enabled high-sensitivity, time-resolved surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy, or SEIRAS, a technique that amplifies the infrared signal of molecules within a few nanometres of the metal surface, allowing the vibrational fingerprints of interfacial water, hydrated protons and adsorbed species to be tracked while the electrode is pushed to substantial overpotentials, far beyond the range accessible to earlier spectroscopic studies.</p>
<p>On the computational side, the team developed a machine-learning molecular dynamics framework built on a charge-based neural network potential called DPχ, which was trained on density-functional-theory calculations for the platinum–water electrochemical interface. An active-learning workflow iteratively explored interfacial configurations, annotated new structures with ab initio calculations, and refined the potential until it could faithfully reproduce the quantum-mechanical energetics of the charged interface. The resulting model could then simulate the double layer over nanosecond timescales, long enough to capture charge fluctuations, solvent reorganization and the behaviour of potassium counterions, while a three-electrode computational scheme allowed the electrode potential itself to be computed and controlled within the simulation.</p>
<p>Bringing experiment and simulation together, the researchers uncovered a nonlinear, two-phase evolution of the inner part of the double layer as the potential was driven more negative under hydrogen evolution conditions. Rather than adjusting gradually, the inner layer first accommodates the growing negative surface charge through conventional ion accumulation, and then undergoes a distinct contraction phase: hydrated potassium counterions partially shed their hydration shells and move closer to the electrode surface. This inner-layer contraction compresses the distance over which the interfacial potential drops, and thereby intensifies the local electric field at the surface to levels well beyond what a classical, rigid double-layer model would predict.</p>
<p>The spectroscopic evidence for this picture is direct. As the potential became more negative, the Pt–D stretching frequencies measured in deuterated electrolyte shifted substantially, a signature of the changing electric field experienced by adsorbed species, and the shift levelled off only below about −1.2 volts, where simulations showed potassium ions reaching their maximum coverage on the surface. Control experiments in electrolytes of different pH and composition ruled out trivial explanations, and computational spectra calculated separately for different regions of the double layer confirmed that the observed spectral changes arise from synchronous restructuring of both the inner and outer layers rather than from bulk effects.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most surprising finding emerged when the team cycled the potential back and forth. Time-resolved spectra with a resolution of 62.5 milliseconds revealed that interfacial water undergoes irreversible restructuring during cyclic potential modulation: the molecular arrangement established under strongly cathodic conditions does not simply unwind when the potential returns to its starting value. Ions and interfacial water were also found to respond asynchronously to the changing potential, meaning that different components of the double layer relax on different timescales. This asynchrony, invisible to any equilibrium measurement, means that a working electrode under rapid modulation is never in the state that classical models assume, with consequences for how electrostatic potential variations, ion electrostriction and electrolyte effects should be interpreted in reactive environments.</p>
<p>To make sense of these observations, the researchers constructed a compressible double-layer model that extends the classical Gouy–Chapman–Stern framework by allowing two key parameters to vary with potential: the distance between the electrode and the centre of a hydrated potassium ion, and the effective volume ratio of that ion relative to a water molecule. Both parameters decrease as the potential becomes more negative, encoding the dehydration of the counterions and their approach toward the surface. The compressible model reproduces the measured ion concentrations, surface charge densities and spectral trends far better than the rigid classical model, and it naturally explains the intensified local field that the spectroscopy reveals during inner-layer contraction.</p>
<p>The implications reach well beyond fundamental electrochemistry. Cation effects are known to modulate the kinetics of carbon dioxide reduction, hydrogen evolution and other electrocatalytic reactions, and electrolyte design has become a powerful lever for tuning catalyst selectivity and activity, yet these effects have often been rationalized with equilibrium pictures of the interface. By establishing a quantitative molecular framework for how the double layer actually behaves far from equilibrium, the study provides a foundation for rationally designing electrolytes that exploit, rather than ignore, the dynamic structure of the charged interface. As the world scales up water electrolysis and electrochemical carbon conversion, the invisible layer where those reactions live is finally coming into focus, and it turns out to be far more fluid, compressible and history-dependent than anyone&#8217;s textbook ever suggested.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Far-from-equilibrium molecular dynamics of the electrical double layer during the hydrogen evolution reaction on platinum electrodes</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Probing far-from-equilibrium dynamics of electrical double layers</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Li, X.-Y., Cai, Y.-C., Meng, Z.-D., Jia, Z.-T., Sun, Y.-C., Ye, J.-Y., Tian, N., Zhou, Z.-Y., Huang, J., Chen, J., Sun, S.-G., &amp; Wang, T. (2026). Probing far-from-equilibrium dynamics of electrical double layers. <em>Nature, 657</em>(8132), 661-667. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10986-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10986-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-026-10986-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41586-026-10986-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> electrical double layer, hydrogen evolution reaction, electrocatalysis, SEIRAS, machine-learning molecular dynamics, platinum electrode, interfacial water, potassium cations, electrolyte design, electrochemistry, electric field intensification, far-from-equilibrium dynamics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">226826</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weaker Water Bonds Boost Hydrogen Evolution on Titanium Dioxide Photocatalysts</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/weaker-water-bonds-boost-hydrogen-evolution-on-titanium-dioxide-photocatalysts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 22:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anatase TiO2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anatase titanium dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charge transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen fuel production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen-bond network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrared spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marcus theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass spectrometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular-scale catalyst interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photocatalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photocatalyst surface chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photocatalytic water splitting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semiconductor materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable energy research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[titanium dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[titanium dioxide photocatalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water splitting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water-catalyst interface]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=199296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study shows that weaker water-TiO2 interactions and more flexible hydrogen-bond networks make interfacial water more reactive in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hydrogen produced by splitting water with sunlight has long been one of the most attractive goals in sustainable energy research, offering a clean fuel whose only byproduct when burned is water. Photocatalytic water splitting, in which semiconductor materials absorb light and use the resulting energetic charge carriers to drive the chemical reactions that liberate hydrogen, promises a direct route from solar energy to storable chemical fuel. Yet despite decades of intense study, the performance of photocatalysts remains limited by processes that occur at scales of just a few molecules, particularly at the interface where water meets the catalyst surface. A new study from the Institute for Molecular Science in Japan now shows that the microscopic structure of the water molecules clinging to a photocatalyst surface plays a decisive role in determining how efficiently hydrogen can be produced, and that some long-standing assumptions about what makes a good catalyst interface may need to be reconsidered.</p>
<p>The research, led by Dr. Zhongqiu Lin together with Associate Professor Toshiki Sugimoto and colleagues, focused on anatase titanium dioxide, one of the most widely studied photocatalytic materials for hydrogen evolution. Although it has been recognized that interactions at the water-catalyst interface are key determinants of photocatalytic performance, systematic experimental studies that explicitly target the structure and reactivity of this interface have remained scarce. The central difficulty is a practical one: probing the molecular structure of interfacial water is challenging under normal circumstances, and it becomes even harder under the conditions where hydrogen is actually being evolved. Compounding the problem, the apparent hydrogen evolution activity measured in an experiment is highly sensitive not only to the surface area of the photocatalyst but also to the amount of water present at the interface, making it difficult to separate genuine differences in reactivity from simple differences in how much water is available to react.</p>
<p>To overcome these obstacles, the team designed a series of experiments using anatase TiO2 photocatalysts with different surface characteristics, allowing them to compare interfaces that interact with water in distinct ways. They combined infrared spectroscopy, which reveals the adsorption states and hydrogen-bonding arrangements of water molecules, with real-time mass spectrometry, which tracks the production of hydrogen gas as it happens. Crucially, the measurements were carried out under precisely controlled hydration conditions ranging from sub-monolayer coverages, where isolated water molecules dot the surface, to several molecular layers of adsorbed water. This control allowed the researchers to examine how water behaves in different interfacial environments while keeping the amount of water explicitly accounted for.</p>
<p>A key methodological advance came from the way the team analyzed their data. By normalizing the measured hydrogen formation rates with respect to both the specific surface area of the photocatalyst and the number of adsorbed water layers, they were able to quantitatively distinguish the intrinsic reactivity of interfacial water from effects that arise simply because different samples hold different amounts of water at their surfaces. This normalization framework meant that when two interfaces showed different hydrogen evolution rates, the difference could be attributed to the molecular structure of the water at those interfaces rather than to trivial differences in surface area or water loading. It is this careful separation of variables that gave the study its power to draw firm conclusions about structure-reactivity relationships.</p>
<p>With this framework in place, the researchers systematically investigated the adsorption state of interfacial water, examining both the strength with which water molecules bind to the TiO2 surface and the mode of adsorption, whether the molecules remain intact or dissociate into hydroxyl groups and protons upon adsorption. The conventional view in photocatalysis has held that strong water-TiO2 interactions should generally be favorable, because strong binding is thought to enhance the trapping of photogenerated charge carriers at the surface, suppress the recombination of electrons and holes, and thereby prolong the lifetimes of the charge carriers that are needed to drive the chemical reactions. Intuitively, longer-lived carriers should mean more opportunities for water molecules to be reduced or oxidized, and hence better catalytic performance.</p>
<p>The experimental results told a different story. Contrary to the conventional expectation, the team found that relatively weaker water-TiO2 interactions were associated with higher reactivity of the interfacial water toward hydrogen evolution. In other words, water molecules that were held less tightly to the surface were, on average, more reactive participants in the photocatalytic reaction than those bound strongly. This observation challenges the intuition that maximizing water-surface binding strength is a reliable design strategy, and it suggests that the factors governing interfacial reactivity are more subtle than charge-carrier dynamics alone.</p>
<p>The explanation, the researchers realized, lies in the fact that interfacial water does not exist as isolated molecules interacting only with the solid surface. Instead, water molecules at the interface also form hydrogen-bond networks with one another, and these networks possess collective structural and dynamical properties of their own. The team therefore turned their attention to how the hydrogen-bonding environment of the interfacial water influences its reactivity. Their analysis revealed that weaker and more flexible hydrogen-bond networks were associated with higher reactivity of the interfacial water. Water held in a rigid, strongly connected network was less reactive, while water embedded in a looser, more pliable network reacted more readily to produce hydrogen.</p>
<p>This finding provides molecular-level insight into what is believed to be the rate-determining step of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution: the initial oxidation of water, which proceeds through proton-coupled charge transfer at the water-TiO2 interface. In such a process, the transfer of a proton is coupled to the movement of electrical charge, and the reaction requires the surrounding molecular environment to reorganize as the reactants transform into products. From the perspective of Marcus theory, the foundational framework for describing electron transfer reactions, the rate of a reaction depends in part on the reorganization energy, that is, the energetic cost of rearranging the molecular environment to accommodate the charge transfer. Greater flexibility and larger fluctuations of the hydrogen-bond network reduce the barriers associated with this molecular reorganization, making it easier for the reaction to proceed. The experimentally observed higher reactivity of more flexible interfacial water is thus consistent with theoretical expectations, and it ties the macroscopic catalytic performance directly to the dynamics of the hydrogen-bond network at the interface.</p>
<p>The implications for photocatalyst design are significant. Because strong water-catalyst interactions have beneficial effects on photogenerated charge carriers, photocatalyst development has traditionally favored hydrophilic interfaces, where water binds strongly to the catalyst surface. The new study reveals, however, that relatively weaker water-TiO2 interactions, which are associated with more flexible hydrogen-bond networks, favor higher reactivity of the interfacial water toward hydrogen evolution. This suggests that the optimal interface is not the one that binds water most tightly, but the one that allows the interfacial water to retain enough structural freedom to undergo the molecular reorganization demanded by the reaction. Surface chemistries, coatings, or morphologies that moderate the strength of water binding while preserving charge-carrier performance could therefore offer a path to more active photocatalysts.</p>
<p>More broadly, the work demonstrates the value of directly characterizing both the adsorption state and the hydrogen-bonding structure of interfacial water and correlating these properties with hydrogen evolution activity under well-controlled conditions. By establishing a quantitative link between the molecular structure of the interface and its catalytic reactivity, the study provides a molecular basis for engineering water-catalyst interfaces to enhance photocatalytic performance. As the field continues to pursue efficient solar-to-chemical energy conversion, the message from the Institute for Molecular Science team is clear: to design better photocatalysts, researchers should look not only at the solid surface itself but also at the delicate, dynamic architecture of the water molecules that sit upon it, and consider giving those molecules a little more room to move.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Structure and reactivity of interfacial water in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution on anatase TiO2</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Bridging interfacial water structure and reactivity in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution at TiO₂ interfaces</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Bridging interfacial water structure and reactivity in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution at TiO₂ interfaces. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1143582" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> photocatalysis, hydrogen evolution, titanium dioxide, interfacial water, hydrogen-bond network, infrared spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, anatase TiO2, solar fuels, water splitting, Marcus theory, charge transfer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199296</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
