<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>interfacial shear strength &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/interfacial-shear-strength/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 23:26:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Single Molecule Choice Boosts Copper-Graphite Thermal Composites by 14 Percent</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/single-molecule-choice-boosts-copper-graphite-thermal-composites-by-14-percent/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 23:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in electronic thermal interface technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper matrix composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copper-graphite thermal composite enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diazotization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphite film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat transfer in electronic components]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of molecular chemistry on heat transfer efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving thermal management in 5G infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface optimization in composite materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial shear strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial thermal resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanical bonding in copper-graphite composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular engineering for thermal conductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular interlayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanostructured materials for heat dissipation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phenol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phenylacetylene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phonon scattering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of organic molecules in thermal interface materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single molecule interlayer in heat dissipation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal conductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultrathin carbon films for electronics cooling]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=263302</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in China show that swapping a single terminal functional group on molecular interlayers raises the interfacial strength of graphite film/copper composites by 44 percent and their thermal conductivity by 14 percent.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heat is the silent enemy of modern electronics. As processors, power modules, and 5G base stations pack more transistors into ever smaller spaces, engineers are racing to find materials that can pull heat away faster than it is generated. One of the most promising candidates is a composite that pairs copper, the workhorse of electrical wiring, with graphite film, an ultrathin form of carbon whose in-plane thermal conductivity can exceed a thousand watts per meter-kelvin. The catch has always been the seam between the two: where graphite meets copper, heat-carrying vibrations scatter and mechanical bonds weaken. A new study published in the Journal of Materials Science by a team at Hunan University of Science and Technology, working with a colleague at the University of Science and Technology Beijing, shows that the solution may lie in a layer of molecules just one molecule thick, and that the identity of the chemical group at the metal-facing end of those molecules makes all the difference.</p>
<p>The research, led by corresponding authors Qian Liu and Junchen Huang with first authors including Zeqiang Hu and Fenfang Lu, tackles a question that has lingered in the composite materials community for years. Molecular interlayers, in which organic molecules are grafted onto a reinforcement surface to bridge it chemically to a metal matrix, are a well-established strategy for strengthening interfaces. Yet while the general approach is known, the specific mechanistic role of the terminal functional group, the chemical handle at the end of the molecule that bonds to the metal, has remained largely unexplored. Most studies change multiple variables at once, making it impossible to say whether improvements come from the molecular backbone, the grafting density, or the metal-facing chemistry. The Chinese team designed their experiment to isolate exactly that one variable.</p>
<p>Their strategy was elegantly simple in concept. They selected two molecules, phenol and phenylacetylene, that share an essentially identical rigid benzene-ring backbone but differ only in the terminal group that faces the copper: a hydroxyl group in the case of phenol, and an alkyne group in the case of phenylacetylene. One end of each molecule was covalently grafted onto the surface of the graphite film using a diazotization reaction, a well-known technique in which aryl diazonium salts form strong carbon-carbon bonds to graphitic carbon. The other end was left free to bond with copper during composite fabrication. Because the two systems differ only in that terminal group, any difference in composite performance could be attributed directly to the strength of the functional group-copper bond.</p>
<p>The results were striking. Interfacial shear strength, a measure of how well the graphite and copper resist sliding past one another under load, rose from 104 plus or minus 2 kilopascals in the phenol-modified composite to 150 plus or minus 3 kilopascals in the phenylacetylene version, an improvement of roughly 44 percent. That jump, the team argues, reflects the stronger bonding that terminal alkynes form with copper surfaces, a chemistry supported by prior surface science work showing that alkynes can react with copper to form stable organocopper structures. In practical terms, a stronger interface means the composite can transfer mechanical load more effectively and resist delamination, a critical failure mode in thermal management components that experience repeated heating and cooling cycles.</p>
<p>Even more consequential for electronics cooling was the effect on heat flow. Heat in graphite and copper travels via phonons, quantized lattice vibrations, and in metals also via electrons. Whenever heat crosses from one material into another at an interface, a portion of that energy is reflected back, a phenomenon quantified as interfacial thermal resistance, sometimes called Kapitza resistance. The researchers infer that the robust covalent and organometallic bonding achieved with the phenylacetylene interlayer effectively suppresses phonon scattering at the graphite-copper boundary, reducing that resistance. The measured thermal conductivity of the composite climbed by about 14 percent, from 1021 plus or minus 18 watts per meter-kelvin to 1165 plus or minus 19 watts per meter-kelvin. For a material already near the top of its class, a double-digit percentage gain from a molecular monolayer is remarkable.</p>
<p>The physics behind this improvement is worth unpacking. When two materials are only weakly bonded, perhaps held together by van der Waals forces or mechanical interlocking, the vibrational modes on either side of the interface couple poorly, and phonons are scattered as if hitting a wall. Strong chemical bonds, by contrast, create a continuous pathway for vibrations to pass through, allowing more of the heat flux to transmit rather than reflect. Molecular dynamics and ab initio studies of single-molecule junctions have shown that thermal conductance across molecular bridges depends sensitively on both the anchoring chemistry and the molecular backbone, and the present work brings that molecular-scale insight to bear on a bulk engineering material.</p>
<p>The choice of graphite film as the reinforcement is itself significant. Unlike graphite flakes or powders, graphite films produced by high-temperature graphitization of polyimide precursors are large-area, self-standing, and highly crystalline, offering exceptional in-plane thermal conductivity. Embedding such films in a copper matrix combines the best of both worlds: the carbon phase conducts heat laterally at extraordinary rates while the copper provides ductility, electrical conductivity, and manufacturability. Previous efforts to improve these composites have included coating the graphite with nickel or tungsten-copper, alloying the copper matrix with zirconium, and using p-phenylenediamine molecular interlayers, an approach reported by an overlapping team in Applied Surface Science in 2026. The new study refines this molecular strategy by demonstrating that the metal-facing end group, not just the presence of an interlayer, is a tunable design parameter.</p>
<p>The broader implication is that interface engineering in thermal composites can now be approached with the precision of synthetic chemistry. Rather than treating the interface as an unavoidable defect, materials designers can select functional groups the way medicinal chemists select ligands, choosing the chemistry that binds most strongly to the target metal. The authors conclude that selecting functional groups with stronger metal-bonding capability is an effective strategy for designing molecular interlayers to optimize the properties of graphite film-copper composites. Because diazotization grafting is a solution-phase process compatible with large-area films, the approach could in principle scale to industrial production without exotic equipment.</p>
<p>Challenges remain before molecularly engineered heat spreaders reach commercial devices. The study measured interfacial shear strength and thermal conductivity, but long-term reliability under thermal cycling, oxidation resistance of the alkyne-copper bond at elevated temperature, and cost at scale all require further validation. The work was supported by the Project of the Hunan Provincial Department of Industry and Information Technology, with testing services provided by Hunan MAG New Material Technology, suggesting an eye toward industrial application. Still, the central lesson is likely to resonate across the field of metal matrix composites, from diamond-copper heat spreaders to carbon fiber reinforced aluminum: at the nanoscale, the weakest link is often a single chemical bond, and strengthening that bond, one functional group at a time, can unlock double-digit gains in performance. As electronics continue to shrink and power densities climb, the molecules sitting invisibly between carbon and copper may prove to be the most important part of the material.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Functional group–copper interfacial bonding in molecularly interlayered graphite film/copper thermal composites</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Role of functional group–Cu interfacial bonding in graphite film/Cu composites with molecular interlayers</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hu, Z., Lu, F., Huang, J., Wang, P., Lu, S., Lü, Z., Chen, Y., Tang, S., &amp; Liu, Q. (2026). Role of functional group–Cu interfacial bonding in graphite film/Cu composites with molecular interlayers. <em>Journal of Materials Science</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13794-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13794-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13794-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10853-026-13794-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> graphite film, copper matrix composites, molecular interlayer, interfacial shear strength, thermal conductivity, functional groups, phenylacetylene, phenol, diazotization, phonon scattering, interfacial thermal resistance, thermal management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">263302</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nanocomposite Aerogel Supercharges Induction Welding of Carbon Fiber Composites</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/nanocomposite-aerogel-supercharges-induction-welding-of-carbon-fiber-composites/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Sanderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 08:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in composite material bonding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerogels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon nanotube and magnetite aerogel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon nanotubes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFRTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaborative research in materials science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact-free joining techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fe3O4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hysteresis loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improved heat distribution in welding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[induction welding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial shear strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joule heating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lightweight automotive and aerospace materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic induction welding process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocomposite aerogel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanocomposite aerogel for induction welding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanocomposite aerogel synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanomaterials in composite manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyamide 6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymer matrix melting and re-fusing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermoplastic composites]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=237352</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in Korea and the United States have developed a carbon nanotube and magnetite nanocomposite aerogel that nearly doubles the heating rate and boosts weld strength by over 30 percent in induction welding of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastics.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welding has long been one of the trickiest steps in manufacturing parts made from carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites, the lightweight materials increasingly favored by the automotive and aerospace industries. Unlike metals, which can be riveted or fusion-welded with relative ease, thermoplastic composites must be joined by melting and re-fusing the polymer matrix at the interface between two parts. Induction welding, which uses an alternating magnetic field to generate heat inside the material, promises fast, contact-free joining, but it suffers from a stubborn problem: the heat is rarely distributed evenly. A team of researchers in South Korea and the United States now reports a clever materials solution that tackles both speed and uniformity at once, using a powdered nanocomposite aerogel made of carbon nanotubes and magnetite embedded in a polyamide 6 matrix.</p>
<p>The research, published in the journal Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials, was led by Nayeong Kim and Inseok Baek, who contributed equally, along with colleagues at the Korea Institute of Materials Science in Changwon, Pusan National University, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee. Corresponding authors Youngseok Oh and Jinsu Kim of KIMS guided the study, which was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea and the Korea Institute of Materials Science, with additional authorship under the U.S. Department of Energy&#8217;s contract with UT-Battelle at Oak Ridge. The work addresses a fundamental tension in induction welding of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastics, known as CFRTPs: effective joining demands both a rapid temperature rise at the weld line and a temperature field that is spatially uniform across the entire bond area.</p>
<p>The difficulty stems from the physics of induction heating itself. When an alternating magnetic field passes through an electrically conductive material, it induces eddy currents that dissipate energy as Joule heat. In a carbon fiber composite, however, the conductive network is formed by fibers that may not create continuous current loops in the right places, and the magnetic field generated by the induction coil is inherently non-uniform, strongest near the coil and weaker farther away. The result is localized hot spots and cold zones, which translate directly into incomplete melting, poor polymer impregnation, and weak welds. Achieving both rapid heating and uniform heating simultaneously has therefore been a persistent challenge, because the strategies that accelerate heating often intensify the non-uniformity.</p>
<p>The Korean-American team&#8217;s answer is a synergistic heating medium: a powdered aerogel composed of carbon nanotubes, iron oxide (Fe3O4) nanoparticles, and polyamide 6. Each component plays a distinct role. The carbon nanotubes form continuous conductive pathways throughout the aerogel, enabling efficient Joule heating when eddy currents are induced, and they also improve heat transfer through the weld interface. The Fe3O4 particles, meanwhile, respond rapidly to the alternating magnetic field through magnetic loss mechanisms, including hysteresis loss, acting as countless nanoscale heat sources distributed throughout the material. Because these magnetic heat sources are dispersed rather than concentrated, they compensate for the non-uniformity of the external field, warming regions that eddy-current heating alone would leave cold.</p>
<p>The aerogel architecture is central to the design. Aerogels are ultralight, highly porous solids, and in this powdered form the nanocomposite can be sprinkled or placed at the weld interface between two CFRTP parts. The porosity and the interconnected CNT network maximize the material&#8217;s interaction with the electromagnetic field while allowing the molten polymer to flow and impregnate the layer during welding. Crucially, the carbon nanotubes do more than generate heat: they also act as nanoscale mechanical pins that bridge the two composite surfaces, reinforcing the joint at the molecular level and enhancing interfacial weld strength beyond what thermal fusion alone can achieve.</p>
<p>The researchers fabricated nanocomposites with varying ratios of CNTs to Fe3O4 and experimentally identified the optimal composition, systematically balancing electrical conductivity against magnetic loss. The performance gains were striking. The nanocomposite-enabled welding system exhibited an initial heating rate of 148.7 degrees Celsius per second, which is 94.6 percent higher than that achieved with carbon fiber composite alone. That figure demonstrates that the dual heating mechanism does not merely redistribute heat; it dramatically accelerates the entire process, a property that matters enormously in industrial settings where cycle time determines economic viability.</p>
<p>Speed, however, would mean little without joint quality, and here too the results were compelling. The interfacial shear strength of welds made with the nanocomposite interlayer increased by 30.8 percent compared with conventional induction welding. Fracture-surface analysis of the broken joints revealed why: the weld areas showed more uniform melting and more effective impregnation of the polymer across the full bond area, rather than the patchy fusion characteristic of overheated-and-underheated regions. In a well-made thermoplastic weld, the polymer chains from each surface interdiffuse and entangle as the interface melts; uniform melting maximizes the area over which this healing occurs, and the CNT pinning adds mechanical interlocking on top.</p>
<p>The implications for manufacturing are considerable. Thermoplastic composites are prized because, unlike thermoset composites, they can be remelted, reshaped, and welded, opening the door to faster production of aircraft structures, automotive body panels, battery enclosures, and hydrogen storage vessels. Induction welding is already used to join thermoplastic aircraft components, but its reliability has been limited by temperature non-uniformity, forcing manufacturers to weld slowly or accept weaker joints. A consumable interlayer material that guarantees rapid, even heating could reduce energy consumption, shorten cycle times, and improve the structural integrity of welded assemblies, all without requiring changes to the induction equipment itself.</p>
<p>The study also highlights a broader trend in materials science: the deliberate combination of multiple physical mechanisms within a single nanostructured material to overcome the limitations of each. Joule heating and magnetic loss heating are complementary responses to the same electromagnetic field, and by embedding both in one aerogel, the researchers created a system in which the weaknesses of one mechanism are offset by the strengths of the other. The mechanical reinforcement provided by the CNT network is a bonus that no purely thermal approach could offer. The authors suggest that this nanocomposite represents a promising strategy for achieving both rapid and spatially uniform interfacial heating, leading to improved mechanical performance in the induction welding of CFRTPs.</p>
<p>Published as an open-access article on 2 September 2026, the paper invites further exploration of composition optimization, scalability of aerogel production, and long-term durability of the welded joints under fatigue and environmental exposure. For now, it stands as a vivid demonstration that sometimes the key to a better industrial process is not a new machine but a smarter material placed precisely where it is needed, a whisper-thin layer of nanotubes and magnetic particles that turns a patchy, uneven weld into a fast, strong, and uniform bond.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Nanocomposite aerogel interlayers for rapid and uniform induction welding of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Synergistic heating effect via CNT/Fe3O4 nanocomposite aerogels enabling uniform and rapid induction welding with high bond strength in CFRTPs</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kim, N., Baek, I., Park, B., Kim, D., Jeong, C., Lee, J., Kim, J.-S., Joo, G., Kim, S., Kumar, V., Oh, Y., &amp; Kim, J. (2026). Synergistic heating effect via CNT/Fe3O4 nanocomposite aerogels enabling uniform and rapid induction welding with high bond strength in CFRTPs. <em>Advanced Composites and Hybrid Materials</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-026-02040-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-026-02040-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42114-026-02040-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s42114-026-02040-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> induction welding, CFRTP, carbon nanotubes, Fe3O4, nanocomposite aerogel, Joule heating, magnetic loss, hysteresis loss, interfacial shear strength, thermoplastic composites, polyamide 6, aerogels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">237352</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dynamic Contact Angle Wins: New Study Rethinks How We Measure Composite Interfaces</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/dynamic-contact-angle-wins-new-study-rethinks-how-we-measure-composite-interfaces/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advances in industrial and engineering chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composite interface bonding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact angle measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic contact angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic contact angle analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epoxy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epoxy resin bonding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiber-matrix interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiber-resin adhesion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glass fiber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications for wind turbine and aircraft composite design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of contact angle measurement techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial shear strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laboratory practices in interface characterization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[materials science research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microdroplet pull-out test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Owens-Wendt equation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[static contact angle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[static droplet method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface wettability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work of adhesion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=226802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study finds that dynamic contact angle measurements, unlike the simpler static droplet method, reliably predict the interfacial shear strength between epoxy resins and glass fibers in composites.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every high-performance composite, from a wind turbine blade to an aircraft fuselage, is only as strong as the invisible boundary where fiber meets resin. For decades, materials scientists have tried to predict that strength by measuring how liquids spread across surfaces, a technique known as contact angle analysis. Now a team of Korean researchers has delivered a finding that could change a routine laboratory practice: the most popular way of measuring contact angles, the quick and simple static droplet method, may be quietly misleading engineers about how well fibers and matrices actually bond.</p>
<p>The study, published in the journal Advances in Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, was conducted by Jong-Hyun Kim and Dong-Jun Kwon of Gyeongsang National University together with Pyeong-Su Shin of the Korea Institute of Convergence Textile. The researchers set out to answer a deceptively simple question: when you want to know how strongly an epoxy resin will grip a glass fiber, should you trust the angle formed by a droplet sitting on the surface, or the forces recorded as a sample is dipped into a liquid? Their answer, backed by hundreds of measurements, favors the dynamic approach.</p>
<p>The logic behind contact angle analysis is elegant. When a drop of water, diiodomethane, formamide or ethylene glycol is placed on a solid, the shape of that drop reflects the balance of surface tensions at the solid, liquid and air interfaces. By measuring angles with several liquids of known surface tension, researchers can decompose a material&#8217;s surface energy into dispersive and polar components using the Owens-Wendt equation, and from there calculate the work of adhesion between two materials. In theory, a higher work of adhesion should translate directly into a stronger interface, quantified as interfacial shear strength, or IFSS, the stress needed to shear the fiber out of its resin jacket.</p>
<p>The team compared two measurement philosophies. The static method is the one most laboratories know well: deposit a droplet, photograph it, and read the angle. For flat epoxy plates the droplet is about a millimeter across; for cylindrical glass fibers, the researchers had to work with droplets of roughly 100 micrometers, either resting on the fiber or embedded along it, and extract the angle from the droplet geometry using the Pythagorean theorem and Young&#8217;s equation. The dynamic method, by contrast, never looks at a droplet at all. Instead, a DCAT 11 instrument lowers the sample into a test liquid at a controlled speed of one millimeter per minute to a depth of two millimeters, and records the weight change. From the forces during immersion and withdrawal, the advancing and receding contact angles are calculated through the Wilhelmy principle.</p>
<p>The static method&#8217;s weakness revealed itself quickly. On glass fibers, the measured contact angle changed not only with the solvent but also with the size of the droplet, even when the surface tension stayed the same. Large droplets sag under their own gravity, distorting the geometry that the angle calculation depends on. Small droplets evaporate rapidly, so the angle captured in the photograph is often a receding angle rather than the advancing angle that theory requires. The researchers also noted that image quality, resolution, brightness, contrast and viewing angle all introduce errors, and that even a carefully polished surface can carry dust or microcracks that skew the result. In short, the static measurement is hostage to a long list of experimental subtleties.</p>
<p>To settle the question, the researchers built four epoxy systems from two resins with different numbers of epoxide groups, DGEBA and TGDDM, and four hardeners with distinct chemistries: an acid anhydride, an amino hardener, and two variants of diaminodiphenyl sulfone known as 33DDS and 44DDS. They measured surface energies for each cured resin and for the glass fiber, computed the work of adhesion for every fiber-resin pairing by both methods, and then measured the true interfacial shear strength with the microdroplet pull-out test. In that test, tiny resin droplets are cured onto single fibers and pulled off in a universal testing machine fitted with a custom microvice, forty times per condition, at a crosshead speed of 0.5 millimeters per minute. The debonding force, divided by the fiber circumference and embedded length, yields the IFSS.</p>
<p>The pull-out results crowned a clear winner among the resins: the TGDDM/33DDS system, whose high crosslink density and stiffness produced the strongest bond to the glass fiber. But when the researchers checked whether the work of adhesion values predicted that ranking, the two measurement methods diverged sharply. The static method produced work of adhesion values around 100 dyne per centimeter that failed to track the IFSS trend at all. The formulation with the highest measured shear strength showed a comparatively low static work of adhesion, while resins with low amino content scored high adhesion values despite weaker interfaces. The dynamic method returned lower absolute values, near 60 dyne per centimeter, but crucially its ranking of the four resins mirrored the ranking from the mechanical pull-out tests.</p>
<p>The explanation lies in how much contact each method actually creates. During dynamic immersion, the liquid wets a large and uniform area of the sample, so the recorded forces integrate genuine chemical interactions across the whole solid-liquid interface. A static droplet, by contrast, touches only a small patch, and its shape is at the mercy of gravity, evaporation and gradual impregnation of the liquid into the substrate over time. The researchers also observed measurement noise in the dynamic force curves for single fibers, a consequence of the tiny sensing area, yet the weight-based data still proved more quantitative and reproducible than droplet photography. For micro-scale fibers in particular, the sensitivity of the balance becomes the decisive factor in measurement quality.</p>
<p>The implications reach well beyond epoxy and glass. Contact angle measurements are a standard tool for evaluating sizing agents on carbon fibers, plasma treatments on basalt, and surface modifications across the fiber-reinforced composites industry. If static droplet measurements can invert the apparent ranking of materials, then design decisions based on them, from sizing formulations to resin selection, may rest on shaky ground. The Korean team&#8217;s conclusion is pragmatic: the static method remains attractive for its simplicity, but for reliable analysis of interfacial properties, the dynamic contact angle method is the more appropriate choice, because it is the one whose surface energy predictions actually agree with what happens when fiber meets resin under load.</p>
<p>There is a broader lesson in the result about the gap between thermodynamic prediction and mechanical reality. The work of adhesion is a theoretical quantity, calculated from idealized surfaces and equilibrium angles, while interfacial shear strength reflects crosslink density, matrix modulus, curing conditions and the messy mechanics of debonding. The dynamic method, by sampling a larger interface and delivering advancing angles uncontaminated by evaporation or gravity, comes closer to bridging that gap. As composites push into ever more demanding applications, the study suggests that the humble dipping experiment, harder to perform but richer in information, deserves a more central place in the materials laboratory than the familiar photograph of a droplet.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Comparison of static and dynamic contact angle methods for predicting fiber-matrix interfacial properties in epoxy-glass fiber composites</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Evaluation of static and dynamic contact angle methods for their correlation with interfacial properties in composites</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Evaluation of static and dynamic contact angle methods for their correlation with interfacial properties in composites. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44405-025-00016-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44405-025-00016-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44405-025-00016-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44405-025-00016-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> contact angle, composites, glass fiber, epoxy, surface energy, interfacial shear strength, work of adhesion, microdroplet pull-out test, dynamic contact angle, static contact angle, fiber-matrix interface, Owens-Wendt equation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">226802</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
