<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>interfacial rheology &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/interfacial-rheology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:02:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>New Flocculants and Demulsifiers Could Transform How the Oil Industry Separates Water From Crude</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-flocculants-and-demulsifiers-could-transform-how-the-oil-industry-separates-water-from-crude/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asphaltenes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrosion and scaling in oil processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost reduction in oil refining through improved water separation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crude oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyclodextrin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demulsifiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demulsifiers for oily wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emulsification and phase separation in oil refining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emulsions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhanced oil recovery wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flocculants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flocculants for crude oil emulsions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of asphaltenes and resins on oil-water separation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative water treatment chemicals for oil industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial rheology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ionic liquids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular mechanisms of emulsions in oil industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil-water separation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petroleum production water treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pickering emulsions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[produced water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stable oil-water emulsions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=194995</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review compares ionic liquids, cyclodextrin polymers, magnetic nanohybrids and bio-based additives for breaking stubborn crude oil-water emulsions, finding that tailored hybrid treatment sequences beat any single miracle chemical.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every barrel of crude oil that reaches a refinery has first had to fight its way out of an intimate embrace with water. During petroleum production, transportation, refining and the treatment of oily wastewater, mechanical shear, pressure fluctuations, pumping and enhanced oil recovery operations relentlessly mix oil and brine into emulsions that are notoriously reluctant to separate. The problem is far more than a nuisance. Stable emulsions raise the apparent viscosity of crude, delay phase separation, cut dehydration efficiency, promote corrosion and scaling, and ultimately degrade the quality of the oil delivered for transport and refining, all of which translate directly into higher operating costs for an industry that operates on razor-thin margins.</p>
<p>The stubbornness of these emulsions has a molecular explanation. Naturally occurring polar components of crude oil, most importantly asphaltenes and resins, adsorb at the oil-water interface and build rigid or viscoelastic films around dispersed droplets. Asphaltenes are high-molecular-weight, aromatic, polar molecules containing nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur heteroatoms; their amphiphilic character lets them accumulate at the interface, lower interfacial tension and form elastic layers that resist rupture. Resins, smaller and more soluble, interact with asphaltene aggregates and can either peptize them, improving solubility, or promote smaller, rapidly adsorbing interfacially active complexes that paradoxically stabilize emulsions further. Hydrogen bonding, pi-pi stacking, acid-base interactions and polar functional groups all reinforce these films. Crucially, recent analysis emphasizes that interfacial rheology, not just equilibrium interfacial tension, governs emulsion persistence: asphaltene-rich layers show high dilatational and shear elasticity that slows film drainage and blocks coalescence even when measured interfacial tension looks acceptably low.</p>
<p>A new review published in the journal Results in Engineering by Roland Nagy and Rebeka Bejczi of the petroleum and chemical engineering community brings these threads together in a critical comparison of conventional and next-generation separation additives. The authors argue that while the literature is rich in mechanism-oriented or technology-oriented surveys, far fewer reviews explicitly weigh emerging, sustainability-oriented additive classes, including ionic liquids, beta-cyclodextrin-functionalized polymers, magnetic nanohybrids and bio-based systems, against each other in terms of mechanism, reported performance, dosage, recyclability, environmental limitations and industrial feasibility. Their conclusion is sobering but constructive: no single universal demulsifier or flocculant exists, and the most promising industrial strategy is almost always a tailored combination of chemicals and physical processes rather than one miracle molecule.</p>
<p>The review first draws a sharp functional line between the two main additive families. Flocculants, which include inorganic coagulants such as aluminium sulfate, ferric chloride and polyaluminium chloride alongside synthetic polymers like polyacrylamide and polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride, are chiefly deployed in oil-in-water systems such as produced water and oily wastewater. They work by charge neutralization, polymer bridging, patching and hydrophobic association, aggregating fine droplets and suspended solids so that sedimentation, flotation and filtration become viable. Demulsifiers, by contrast, target water-in-oil crude emulsions. Typically nonionic polyethers, alkoxylated resins and ethylene oxide-propylene oxide block copolymers, they diffuse to the interface, displace or weaken the natural asphaltene-resin film and allow droplets to coalesce into separable volumes, cutting the basic sediment and water content before crude leaves the field. In complex field fluids containing fine solids and mixed emulsion structures, the two approaches can be sequenced: a demulsifier weakens the film, then a flocculant sweeps up the destabilized debris.</p>
<p>Among the emerging materials, beta-cyclodextrin-functionalized flocculants stand out for their elegant molecular design. Cyclodextrin is a toroidal sugar with a hydrophilic exterior and a hydrophobic internal cavity, letting it encapsulate hydrophobic oil components while grafted cationic polymer chains neutralize negatively charged droplets and long graft chains perform adsorption bridging. The review highlights a recent report of a graft-functionalized beta-cyclodextrin flocculant that achieved 95.9 percent oil removal from emulsified oily wastewater at a remarkably low dose of just 2.5 milligrams per liter. However, the authors caution that charge density, hydrophobicity and graft length all interact with salinity and temperature: high ionic strength screens electrostatic interactions, while heat reshapes polymer conformation, so laboratory wins under low-salt model conditions must be validated across realistic salinity and temperature windows before field deployment.</p>
<p>Ionic liquids, salts that remain liquid near room temperature, are the most intensively studied new demulsifier class. Their appeal lies in low volatility, thermal stability and almost unlimited structural tunability: imidazolium, pyridinium, ammonium, phosphonium and Gemini-type cations can be paired with bromide, tetrafluoroborate, hexafluorophosphate, acetate or sulfonate anions, and alkyl chain length can be adjusted to tune oil-phase affinity. Selecting studies report high demulsification efficiency at doses around 1500 parts per million over several hours of treatment. The physics is a delicate balancing act: a sufficiently hydrophobic alkyl chain enhances penetration of asphaltene-rich films, but excessive oil solubility drains the effective interfacial concentration, while excessive water solubility limits access to water-in-oil interfaces. The review also flags the caveats. Industrial adoption remains constrained by cost, potential toxicity, questionable biodegradability and regeneration requirements, and the authors insist that future studies must go beyond bottle tests to include toxicity screening, recyclability assessment, environmental fate analysis and techno-economic evaluation.</p>
<p>Magnetic nanodemulsifiers add a third dimension: recoverability. Magnetite nanoparticles coated with silica, polymers, cyclodextrins, ionic liquids or carbon-based shells can adsorb at the interface, disrupt stabilizing films and then be retrieved with an external magnet for reuse. One flagship example cited is a nanomagnetic cyclodextrin system decorated with an ionic liquid, which delivered 92 percent demulsification efficiency in a water-in-oil crude emulsion, although at a high dose of 5000 parts per million over 24 hours. The trade-offs are familiar: nanoparticle losses during recovery, fouling, regeneration inefficiency, synthesis cost at scale and unresolved questions about ecotoxicity and the environmental fate of released nanoparticles. Bio-based demulsifiers, including biosurfactants, lignin derivatives, tannin materials, polysaccharides and cyclodextrin formulations, complete the sustainability portfolio, but the authors warn that renewable origin alone guarantees nothing; aquatic toxicity, biodegradability under OECD-type protocols, bioaccumulation potential, solvent demand and life-cycle impacts must all be verified quantitatively.</p>
<p>The review also confronts the hardest separation targets: Pickering emulsions, in which solid particles such as clays, silica, corrosion products, mineral fines and asphaltene aggregates adsorb at the interface and physically armor each droplet. These particle-stabilized systems shrug off conventional molecular demulsifiers, so treatment demands particle detachment, wettability modification, or hybrid assistance from ultrasound, electrocoalescence or membranes. Intriguingly, the authors connect this problem to capillary physics in porous media, noting that insights from spontaneous imbibition and nanoparticle-surfactant-brine studies, where interfacial tension and wettability control oil displacement, can inform the design of additives for particle-stabilized emulsions. Chemical treatment is likewise most powerful when hybridized with physical methods: heating lowers viscosity but burns energy, electrostatic coalescence enlarges droplets but demands suitable conductivity, membranes polish fine droplets but foul, and a practical sequence might run from chemical pretreatment through controlled mixing and electrocoalescence to flotation and membrane polishing, with antifouling strategies such as hydrophilic or zwitterionic coatings protecting the final stage.</p>
<p>Perhaps the review&#8217;s most valuable contribution is its blunt assessment of the laboratory-to-field gap. Real produced waters span pH values from 4.3 to 10, salinities from 1000 to as much as 400,000 milligrams per liter, oil-and-grease contents of 2 to 565 milligrams per liter, suspended solids up to 1000 milligrams per liter, and temperatures from roughly 3 to 80 degrees Celsius, often laced with residual production chemicals that compete with demulsifiers at the interface. High bottle-test efficiency, the authors argue, is merely an initial screening result, not proof of industrial applicability. They propose a standardized qualification workflow incorporating bottle tests at varying dosage and temperature, standardized water-and-sediment determination, dynamic interfacial tension and interfacial rheology, zeta potential, droplet-size distribution, turbidity and robustness testing across salinity, pH, shear and solids loading, together with design-of-experiments matrices that include asphaltene-to-resin ratio and aging time.</p>
<p>Looking forward, the authors see artificial intelligence and molecular simulation reshaping the field, with machine learning, molecular dynamics and density functional theory screening ionic liquids, polymer architectures and cyclodextrin systems before any synthesis is attempted. Smart stimulus-responsive additives, activated by pH, temperature, magnetic fields or carbon dioxide, promise controlled action, easier recovery and lower chemical consumption, while circular-economy thinking demands that recyclability be demonstrated through mass balance, toxicity data and life-cycle assessment rather than asserted from renewable feedstocks. The bottom line for an industry under pressure to cut both costs and environmental footprint: asphaltene-rich crudes need strong film-disrupting demulsifiers, solids-laden streams need particle detachment and flotation, high-salinity or offshore operations value robustness and speed over peak efficiency, and the winning technology will rarely be a single chemical but an engineered sequence of chemistry and physics matched to the dominant stabilization mechanism in each unique crude oil-water system.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Advanced flocculants and demulsifiers for separating crude oil-water emulsions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Advanced flocculants and demulsifiers for crude oil–water systems: recent developments, mechanisms and future perspectives</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Nagy, R., &amp; Bejczi, R. (2026). Advanced flocculants and demulsifiers for crude oil–water systems: recent developments, mechanisms and future perspectives. <em>Results in Engineering, 32</em>, Article 112816. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.112816" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.112816</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.112816" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.rineng.2026.112816</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> crude oil, emulsions, demulsifiers, flocculants, asphaltenes, ionic liquids, cyclodextrin, magnetic nanoparticles, Pickering emulsions, produced water, oil-water separation, interfacial rheology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">194995</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
