<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>interaction networks &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/interaction-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 16:26:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Matching Carbon to Pollutants Steers Microbial Cleanup in Electro-Assisted Reactors</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/matching-carbon-to-pollutants-steers-microbial-cleanup-in-electro-assisted-reactors/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 16:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anaerobic systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon source optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-substrate dosing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological network architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electro-assisted bioreactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical pollutant remediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interaction networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial bioreactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial community ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial succession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[niche occupancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollutant degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollutant removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollutant-microbe interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recalcitrant organics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redox control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redox environment control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic organic chemical removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment innovation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=248593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A systematic pairing of three carbon sources with three pollutants in electro-assisted bioreactors reveals that carbon-pollutant matching drives microbial succession regimes and produces up to fourfold differences in pollutant removal.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most persistent frustrations in industrial wastewater treatment is the stubborn refusal of many synthetic organic chemicals to break down, even inside carefully engineered bioreactors. A new study published in Communications Earth &amp; Environment suggests that the missing ingredient in many of these systems is not a better degrading microbe or a stronger electric current, but a more thoughtful match between the carbon source fed to the microbial community and the pollutant it is supposed to eliminate. The research, led by Ruixiang Li and colleagues at Nankai University together with partners at Guangzhou University, the Agro-Environmental Protection Institute and Inner Mongolia University, shows that the identity of the co-substrate supplied alongside a pollutant can swing removal performance by roughly fourfold, and that this variation is driven less by the presence of a few star degraders than by the architecture of the entire ecological network inside the reactor.</p>
<p>The platform at the heart of the study is the electro-assisted bioreactor, a device that uses electrodes to impose a controlled redox environment on a microbial community. By tuning the potential at the electrode surface, operators can supply electrons to or withdraw them from the microbial consortium with a precision that conventional anaerobic digesters cannot match. This makes electro-assisted systems attractive for tackling recalcitrant industrial organics, molecules whose chemical structures resist the standard enzymatic machinery of anaerobic metabolism. Yet in practice, engineers almost always dose these reactors with an auxiliary carbon source, a co-substrate such as acetate, glucose or a similar readily degradable compound, to keep the community energized and to provide the reducing power needed to activate difficult pollutants. The problem, as the new work demonstrates, is that this dosing has traditionally been empirical, guided by habit rather than by ecological reasoning, and the consequences of choosing the wrong co-substrate can be severe.</p>
<p>When a co-substrate and a pollutant are mismatched, the electrons and carbon that operators intend to funnel toward pollutant transformation can be diverted into what the authors call non-productive sinks. Instead of powering the reductive or oxidative steps that dismantle the target molecule, the microbial community may simply burn through the added carbon in fermentation, methanogenesis or biomass growth, leaving the pollutant largely untouched. The carbon is consumed, the electricity is spent, and the treatment goal is missed. This carbon-pollutant mismatch is not a marginal inefficiency; the study reports that across the experimental matrix, differences in removal performance reached approximately fourfold depending solely on which carbon source was paired with which pollutant. For treatment plants facing strict discharge limits on toxic organics, that magnitude of variation is the difference between compliance and failure.</p>
<p>To dissect this phenomenon systematically, the team designed an elegant factorial experiment. Three representative carbon sources were crossed with three representative pollutants, producing nine distinct pairings, each cultivated under the same electrochemical redox control. This design allowed the researchers to isolate the effect of carbon identity from the effect of pollutant identity and to observe how the two interact. Rather than measuring only the endpoint of pollutant removal, the team tracked the full ecological drama unfolding inside each reactor: which microbial taxa rose and fell over time, how the succession of species proceeded, and how the web of interactions among community members reorganized itself under each pairing. The result was a remarkably clear demonstration that successional trajectories and network configurations diverged reproducibly across the nine combinations, meaning that the carbon source was not merely fueling the community but actively scripting its developmental path.</p>
<p>From these trajectories, the researchers identified three distinct succession regimes that describe how the community allocates its attention between the co-substrate and the pollutant. In the pollutant-dominated regime, the microbial assemblage organizes itself primarily around the transformation of the target compound, with the co-substrate playing a supporting role. In the co-dominated regime, the added carbon becomes the main stage on which the community performs, and pollutant degradation recedes into the background. Between these extremes lies the co-dominated or carbon-dominated spectrum, where both resources shape the community jointly. The critical insight is that these regimes are not random outcomes; they emerge predictably from the pairing of carbon identity and pollutant identity, because each co-substrate reshapes the available niches and the interspecies dependencies within the community, redirecting the metabolic routing of electrons and carbon toward or away from the pollutant.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most striking quantitative finding of the study is the strength of the association between ecological structure and treatment performance. The researchers found that pollutant removal correlated most strongly with niche occupancy and ecological interactions, yielding a correlation coefficient of negative 0.853 with a p-value below 0.01. In practical terms, this means that the state of the interaction network, the pattern of who cooperates with whom, who competes for which resource, and which niches are actually filled, explains removal outcomes far better than any simple measure of degrader abundance. A reactor can harbor the right pollutant-degrading species and still fail if the surrounding network channels resources elsewhere. Conversely, a well-structured network can amplify modest degrader populations into robust removal performance. This supports what the authors describe as network-level emergence: the treatment function of the reactor is a property of the community as a whole, not a simple sum of individual capabilities.</p>
<p>The implications of this ecological framing extend well beyond the laboratory. For decades, the dominant strategy for enhancing biodegradation has been degrader-focused: identify the microorganism capable of attacking the pollutant, then optimize conditions to favor it, whether through bioaugmentation, selective dosing or genetic characterization. The new study argues that this strategy is fundamentally incomplete. Because co-substrates reshape niches and interspecies dependencies, the fate of a degrader population depends on the ecological context in which it is embedded. A co-substrate that supports one degrader in one pairing may undermine it in another by feeding competitors or by rerouting electron flow toward methanogens. The authors therefore propose a shift from degrader-focused dosing to a network-centric strategy, in which the operator asks not which microbe to favor but which community configuration to cultivate, and selects the carbon source accordingly.</p>
<p>This network-centric perspective arrives at a moment when wastewater treatment is under pressure to become both more effective and more climate-friendly. Electro-assisted and related anaerobic systems are increasingly promoted as low-carbon alternatives to energy-intensive conventional treatment, and smart operation schemes promise to adjust reactor conditions in real time based on sensor feedback. The study provides a decision-oriented basis for such control: rather than treating co-substrate dosing as a fixed recipe, operators could treat it as a tunable ecological lever, matched dynamically to the pollutant load entering the reactor. Because the study demonstrates that successional regimes are reproducible and that removal performance tracks network state, the framework lends itself to predictive models that could inform automated dosing decisions, reducing both wasted carbon and missed treatment targets.</p>
<p>The research also carries conceptual weight for microbial ecology more broadly. By holding redox conditions constant across all nine pairings, the experiment isolates resource identity as the driver of community assembly, offering a clean demonstration that the chemical form of carbon inputs can act as a master variable shaping succession in engineered ecosystems. The finding that interaction networks, not individual taxa, are the strongest predictors of function echoes a growing recognition in ecology that emergent properties of communities deserve measurement in their own right. For the field of environmental biotechnology, the message is that the reactor is an ecosystem, and managing it well requires thinking like an ecologist.</p>
<p>Looking forward, the authors position their work as an ecology-informed foundation for tailoring carbon dosing to pollutant context in electro-assisted and related anaerobic systems. The immediate practical takeaway for engineers is straightforward: before adding a co-substrate, consider what the pollutant needs and what the community will do with the carbon you provide. The longer-term vision is smarter, adaptive wastewater infrastructure in which carbon dosing, electrode potential and hydraulic operation are coordinated to steer microbial succession deliberately, rather than hoping the right community assembles by chance. As industrial societies confront ever more diverse streams of synthetic organic pollutants, the ability to choreograph microbial communities with this level of ecological precision may prove to be one of the most valuable tools in the environmental toolkit, turning the invisible dynamics of succession and interaction into a controllable asset for clean water and a low-carbon future.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> How carbon source and pollutant matching shape microbial succession and pollutant removal in electro-assisted bioreactors</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Carbon source and pollutant matching shapes microbial succession and removal regimes under electrochemical redox control</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Li, R., Wan, Y., Wang, G., Zhang, X., Wang, Z., Li, T., Wang, X., &amp; Zhou, Q. (2026). Carbon source and pollutant matching shapes microbial succession and removal regimes under electrochemical redox control. <em>Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-04100-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-04100-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-04100-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s43247-026-04100-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> electro-assisted bioreactors, microbial succession, co-substrate dosing, pollutant removal, wastewater treatment, microbial ecology, redox control, interaction networks, niche occupancy, recalcitrant organics, anaerobic systems, low-carbon treatment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">248593</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yeast Genetics Map How Thousands of Variants Reshape the Protein Interactome</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/yeast-genetics-map-how-thousands-of-variants-reshape-the-protein-interactome/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complex trait dissection through interaction networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functional genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic variation impact on protein interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome-wide association studies in yeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GWAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interaction networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mapping DNA variants to protein interaction changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missing heritability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular basis of genetic variants in protein interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural genetic variation and cellular function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noncoding RNAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piQTL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein interactome reshaped by genetic variation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein-protein interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proteome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantitative trait loci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single nucleotide polymorphisms in yeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[understanding disease-associated DNA variants through protein interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yeast genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yeast model system for protein interaction studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yeast protein-protein interaction mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae genetic diversity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=205423</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A large-scale study in budding yeast has mapped how roughly 12,000 natural genetic variants reshape the strength of protein–protein interactions in living cells, revealing a new layer of complex trait architecture.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For decades, geneticists have grappled with a stubborn problem: genome-wide association studies have linked thousands of DNA variants to human diseases, but for most of these variants, no one knows what the changed nucleotide actually does inside a cell. A new study published in Nature Genetics offers a fresh way forward by taking the search for variant function directly to one of biology&#8217;s most fundamental molecular events, the physical meeting of two proteins. A team led by Savandara Besse, Tatsuya Sakaguchi, Stephen W. Michnick and Adrian W. R. Serohijos at the Université de Montréal has mapped, at unprecedented scale, how natural genetic variation reshapes protein–protein interactions in living cells, and in doing so has created what they describe as a roadmap for dissecting complex traits through the lens of interaction networks.</p>
<p>The study exploited a deceptively simple but powerful model system, the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The researchers worked with 354 inbred yeast strains originally developed in a previous effort, a cohort that collectively carries roughly 12,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms distributed across all yeast chromosomes and even the mitochondrial genome. Because the strains are inbred, their alleles segregate in an approximately 50:50 pattern, which gives the mapping approach clean statistical footing. Crucially, this kind of population has long been a workhorse for classical quantitative trait loci studies, but the Montreal team asked a question that had rarely been posed at this scale: rather than measuring visible traits or mRNA levels, could they measure the strength of protein–protein interactions themselves as quantitative traits, and then trace those measurements back to specific DNA variants?</p>
<p>To answer that question, the group deployed a protein-fragment complementation assay built on murine dihydrofolate reductase, or DHFR. The strategy works like a molecular switch. Each of two interacting partner proteins is fused to a complementary fragment of the DHFR enzyme. When the two proteins come together in the living cell, the fragments reconstitute a functional enzyme that confers resistance to the drug methotrexate. Growth under drug pressure therefore becomes a quantitative, high-throughput readout of interaction strength: the more strongly two proteins associate, the better the cells survive. The researchers engineered 61 such reporter pairs, tagging the relevant genes directly in the chromosomes of every strain using a streamlined CRISPR/Cas9 and homologous recombination workflow, and gave each strain a unique DNA barcode so that all 354 genomes could be pooled and sequenced together in a single competitive growth assay.</p>
<p>The results, presented across a series of Manhattan plots and quantitative maps, revealed a rich landscape the authors call the genetic architecture of protein–protein interactions, summarized in a new class of loci they named piQTLs, protein-interaction quantitative trait loci. Across 61 reporter pairs and five growth conditions, the team identified roughly 1,180 lead variants, about four per reporter pair per condition, corresponding to 354 unique SNPs spread over 282 distinct gene loci. The single most striking pattern concerned the split between cis- and trans-acting effects. Variants acting in cis, meaning they sit near the genes encoding the interacting pair itself, were rare. Variants acting in trans, located anywhere else in the genome and often on entirely different chromosomes, dominated the landscape and carried noticeably stronger per-variant effect sizes. In this respect, the regulation of protein interactions echoes a theme well established for gene expression, where trans effects are numerous and diffuse, but the interaction layer adds its own architectural twist.</p>
<p>That twist emerged when the researchers looked at where trans-piQTLs fall in the yeast protein interaction network. Consistent with the small-world architecture that characterizes protein networks, variants influencing a given reporter interaction tended to map to genes encoding proteins that sit close to that reporter pair in the network, even when the variants were far away in genomic space. The team formalized this observation through large-scale simulations, randomly drawing comparable sets of genes 10,000 times and asking how often they would fall as near to a reporter pair as the real piQTLs did. The answer was clear: the observed proximity was not a product of chance. This network-proximity principle is more than a statistical curiosity. It suggests that the web of interactions inside a cell channels the downstream effects of genetic variation, meaning that perturbations propagate along local neighborhoods of the interactome rather than scattering randomly, a property that could be exploited to prioritize candidate causal genes in human disease studies.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most provocative findings came from the poorly annotated corners of the yeast genome. The researchers identified and experimentally validated piQTLs in noncoding RNAs, including the Xrn1-sensitive antisense transcripts known as XUTs, as well as in 3&#8242; untranslated regions, and these regulatory variants carried effect sizes comparable to those of variants landing squarely inside protein-coding sequences. In other words, DNA that does not code for protein can still measurably tune how two proteins grip each other in vivo. This finding expands the functional repertoire of noncoding variation and hints that some of the so-called missing heritability of complex human traits, the gap between known genetic associations and explained disease risk, may hide not only in unannotated regulatory DNA but in its consequences for the physical wiring of the proteome.</p>
<p>The study also delivered an instructive comparison with two other molecular QTL disciplines, expression QTLs that track mRNA abundance and protein abundance QTLs that track protein levels. When the team overlapped their piQTLs with results from highly powered yeast linkage studies, including an eQTL analysis of 942 diverse isolates and a pQTL analysis of 1,086 near telomere-to-telomere genomes, a telling asymmetry appeared: piQTLs overlapped more with pQTLs than with eQTLs, even after rigorous size-matched permutation testing. The interpretation is that protein interactions sit downstream of transcription and closer to the proteome-level machinery of the cell, capturing post-transcriptional regulation, protein abundance effects and molecular assembly processes that RNA measurements simply cannot see. Some variants alter how much of a protein is made; others change what that protein does once made, and the interactome assay registers both.</p>
<p>The practical payoff of the approach became visible when the researchers grew their pooled strains under drug treatment. In experiments with methotrexate, fluconazole, 5-fluorocytosine, metformin and trifluoperazine, drug-specific piQTLs emerged that traced the mechanism of action of each compound through the interaction network. Fluconazole, an antifungal that targets the Erg11 enzyme of the ergosterol pathway, produced piQTLs concentrated in genes linked to that pathway, including variants inside the Erg11 coding sequence itself. Metformin, the widely used diabetes drug, revealed interaction changes in mitochondrial and metabolic proteins that align with known aspects of its biology. This capacity to read a drug&#8217;s fingerprint directly off the interactome suggests that piQTL mapping could become a genuine screening tool, one that identifies variants modulating drug response and flags off-target mechanisms that conventional growth assays might miss entirely.</p>
<p>All of the raw sequencing data, computational code and mapping results have been released openly, with raw reads deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus, analysis pipelines on GitHub, and an interactive web server that lets any visitor browse the Manhattan plots, quantile–quantile diagnostics and a genome browser annotated with noncoding RNA features. The authors acknowledge clear limitations, including the modest number of reporter interactions surveyed relative to the thousands of interactions known in yeast and the statistical power constraints of a 354-strain cohort, which can only detect effect sizes of roughly 0.06 or larger. Yet the conceptual advance is hard to overstate. By demonstrating that the strength of protein–protein interactions behaves as an ordinary quantitative trait that can be mapped across a genome, the study opens a third major molecular dimension for genetics, beyond transcript and protein abundance, and points toward a future in which the interpretive power of human genome-wide association studies is amplified by the connective tissue of the cell, the interaction networks where biology actually happens.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Mapping how natural genetic variation alters in vivo protein–protein interaction strength in budding yeast.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Genetic landscape of an in vivo protein interactome</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Genetic landscape of an in vivo protein interactome. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-026-02747-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-026-02747-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-026-02747-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41588-026-02747-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> protein–protein interactions, piQTL, yeast genetics, quantitative trait loci, noncoding RNAs, GWAS, missing heritability, proteome, CRISPR, drug mechanisms, interaction networks, functional genomics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">205423</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
