<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare education &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/integration-of-artificial-intelligence-in-healthcare-education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 20:32:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Sri Lankan medical undergraduates report widespread AI use, with limited formal training</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/sri-lankan-medical-undergraduates-report-widespread-ai-use-with-limited-formal-training/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courtney Benton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 20:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI applications in clinical and preclinical learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI in medical education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI literacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI proficiency self-assessment in medical students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI training gaps in medical curriculum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ChatGPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curriculum integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital health literacy among Sri Lankan medical undergraduates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health information technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of AI on medical student assignment support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical students attitudes towards AI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical undergraduates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient care implications of AI use in medical education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sri Lanka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sri Lankan medical students AI tool usage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student perceptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student perceptions of AI-enhanced learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use of ChatGPT and other AI tools in medical training]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=322622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A cross-sectional survey of 369 medical undergraduates at one Sri Lankan faculty found widespread self-reported AI use alongside differences in attitudes across year groups, but the design cannot establish change over time or causal effects.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A cross-sectional online survey of medical undergraduates at one Sri Lankan medical faculty found widespread reported use of artificial intelligence applications despite limited formal training. The study analysed 369 responses from Years 1–5 at SUSL in May 2025, assessing AI tool use, self-rated proficiency, attitudes toward AI in medical education and patient care, and support for curriculum integration. The results are reported in BMC Medical Education.</p>
<p>Among the 369 respondents, 366, or 99.2%, reported using AI-based applications. Of these respondents, ChatGPT was the most frequently used tool at 98.1%, followed by Google Gemini at 35.0%, DeepSeek at 20.2% and Microsoft Copilot at 6.3%. The main uses were subject-matter reference, reported by 89.3% of AI users, general information retrieval by 73.0%, assignment assistance by 50.8% and writing improvement by 39.6%. Self-rated proficiency was highest for ChatGPT, with 92.4% of its users rating their proficiency as good or higher. In an analysis of 360 respondents, 77.5% reported using Medscape, 37.2% used UpToDate and 15.3% used WebMD or WebMD Symptom Checker.</p>
<p>Most students agreed that AI could enhance learning in preclinical subjects, with 85.1% expressing agreement, compared with 77.8% for paraclinical subjects and 68.6% for clinical subjects. The questionnaire contained 12 Likert-scale items covering curriculum integration, physician roles and patient care. After adjustment for multiple comparisons, agreement with including AI in the medical curriculum differed significantly across year groups, according to a Kruskal–Wallis test (H = 29.00, Holm-adjusted p &lt; 0.001). The abstract also reports differences in attitudes toward AI for selected items between preclinical and clinical students, with higher agreement among some earlier-year groups for curriculum support.</p>
<p>These findings support consideration of structured, ethically grounded AI education that addresses students’ needs for safe, effective and responsible use of AI. The study is limited by its cross-sectional design, self-reported online responses and focus on undergraduates at a single Sri Lankan medical faculty. It describes reported use, proficiency and attitudes at one point in time; it cannot establish longitudinal change, causal effects or the effectiveness of any educational intervention. The authors’ conclusion is therefore a consideration for curriculum development rather than evidence that a particular training programme improves outcomes.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Medical students’ use and perceptions of artificial intelligence</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Artificial intelligence use, perceptions, and educational needs among medical undergraduates at a Sri Lankan medical faculty: a cross-sectional survey</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Andadola, A. M. S. U., Walallawita, W. K. M. M. M., Perera, P. D. V. M., &amp; Mendis, S. N. J. K. (2026). Artificial intelligence use, perceptions, and educational needs among medical undergraduates at a Sri Lankan medical faculty: a cross-sectional survey. <em>BMC Medical Education</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10496-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10496-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10496-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s12909-026-10496-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> artificial intelligence, medical education, medical undergraduates, Sri Lanka, AI literacy, student perceptions, curriculum integration, ChatGPT, health information technology, Artificial, intelligence, perceptions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">322622</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
