<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>INRAE &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/inrae/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 22:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Sorghum Could Replace Most Maize in European Livestock Feed as Climate Warms</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/sorghum-could-replace-most-maize-in-european-livestock-feed-as-climate-warms/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 22:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Athmospheric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptation strategies in European agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate-resilient livestock feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop yields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought-resistant crops for livestock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought-tolerant crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth's Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of heatwaves on crop yields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European maize decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future of cereal crops in Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of climate change on agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INRAE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irrigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irrigation reliance in France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[livestock feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sorghum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sorghum as alternative feed crop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable European farming practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water-intensive crops]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=242515</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study in Earth's Future projects that climate change will boost European sorghum yields enough to replace roughly 90 percent of the maize used in livestock feed if the crop is grown one year in three.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>European agriculture is facing a reckoning with water. Maize, the continent&#8217;s dominant cereal for livestock feed, has just posted one of its weakest harvests in years, with the most recent European Union estimate falling to 49.1 million tonnes—the first time in sixteen years that production has slipped below the 50-million-tonne mark. The decline is not an anomaly but a symptom: maize is a water-hungry crop, and across much of France it depends on irrigation, accounting for 38 percent of the country&#8217;s irrigated cropland. As heatwaves intensify and summer rainfall becomes less reliable, the question confronting agronomists is no longer whether maize-centric feeding systems can continue as before, but what can realistically take their place. A new peer-reviewed study published in the journal Earth&#8217;s Future offers a carefully quantified answer, and it points to an old crop with a new role: sorghum.</p>
<p>Sorghum is hardly a novelty in global agriculture. It is already a staple in the world&#8217;s arid and semi-arid belts, with African countries producing roughly 47 percent of the global harvest and the United States a further 17 percent. Its reputation rests on a robust physiological profile: the crop tolerates high temperatures and sustained low water availability far better than maize, which makes it a frequent choice in regions where cereal farming must contend with chronic drought. Yet in Europe, sorghum remains marginal. It currently occupies just 0.1 percent of the continent&#8217;s cropland, and its potential role in European livestock feed has never been systematically examined at the continental scale—nor has its relationship with the changing European climate been rigorously mapped. That gap is precisely what the new research, led by scientists at France&#8217;s National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE), set out to close.</p>
<p>The methodological core of the study is a machine-learning model designed to predict grain sorghum yields from a set of key climate parameters, including relative humidity, temperature, and precipitation. Rather than relying on experimental plots or theoretical crop simulations alone, the researchers grounded their model in observational reality: historical yield records of grain sorghum collected across departments and counties in France, Italy, Spain, and the United States between 2000 and 2020. The dataset comprised 11,644 individual data points spanning a wide range of climatic zones, giving the model an unusually broad empirical foundation. Training on real, geographically diverse yield data means the model captures how sorghum actually responds to weather variability under commercial growing conditions, not just how it behaves in idealized trials.</p>
<p>Once trained, the model was coupled with forward-looking climate data to generate yield projections for two target periods: the mid-century and the late twenty-first century. To ensure the conclusions were not hostage to any single vision of the future, the team drew on twenty distinct climate change scenarios, themselves generated using five different climate models. This ensemble approach is a standard but crucial safeguard in climate-impact research. Climate models—mathematical and computational representations of the climate system built on the laws of physics, fluid dynamics, and chemistry and calibrated with real observational data—inevitably differ in their regional projections. By averaging across many scenarios, the researchers could distinguish robust signals from model-specific noise and arrive at conclusions that hold up across a range of plausible futures.</p>
<p>The headline finding is striking: within Europe, climate change is projected to have a positive overall impact on sorghum yields. Under current climatic conditions, mean sorghum production across the continent sits at approximately 3 tonnes per hectare. Depending on the specific climate scenario, that figure is expected to climb to between 3.4 and 3.8 tonnes per hectare under future conditions spanning 2050 to 2100. The picture is not uniform, however. The projections reveal meaningful regional variation, with yields increasing in northern Europe while declining slightly in southern Europe—a pattern consistent with the general expectation that warming will lengthen growing seasons at higher latitudes while intensifying heat and water stress in the Mediterranean zone.</p>
<p>Perhaps more consequential than the yield averages is the change in the geography of reliable production. The study found that the geographical areas characterized by high and stable sorghum output are predicted to expand substantially, growing from 22 percent of European cropland under current climatic conditions to between 29 and 34 percent by the end of the century. In other words, as the climate warms, a larger share of the continent becomes not merely suitable for sorghum but reliably productive. For a crop that today occupies a token fraction of European fields, this projected expansion of the viable production zone represents a significant opportunity for agricultural planning: the places where sorghum could be grown with confidence are set to multiply precisely as the places where maize struggles continue to grow as well.</p>
<p>The implications for livestock feeding are where the study&#8217;s numbers become genuinely transformative. According to the researchers&#8217; analysis, if sorghum were grown one year out of three in a rotational system, it could potentially replace around 90 percent of the maize currently used in European livestock feed. That figure reframes sorghum from a niche drought-tolerant curiosity into a plausible backbone of a climate-resilient feeding strategy. The logic rests on sorghum&#8217;s demonstrated robustness under high temperatures and scarce water—the very conditions that are becoming the norm rather than the exception across much of the continent. Maize, by contrast, remains heavily dependent on irrigation, a dependency that grows more costly and contested with every dry summer.</p>
<p>The water dimension deserves particular emphasis, because it connects the agronomic findings to a broader resource-management challenge. In France, where maize dominates irrigated agriculture, shifting a substantial share of feed production to a crop that requires little or no irrigation would free up water that could be redirected to other uses. The study&#8217;s authors highlight this explicitly: within France, expanding sorghum production and incorporating the grain into livestock feed could help address major challenges such as the management of water resources, with the water saved potentially allocated to other crops. The stated goal of such reallocation is to increase feed self-sufficiency in France—a pressing concern for a country whose livestock sector depends on feed supplies that climate change is making progressively harder to sustain.</p>
<p>The timing of the research lends it urgency. The most recent official French statistics on agriculture, food, forestry, and fisheries, compiled by the Agreste statistical service, put maize production at 49.1 million tonnes—the first dip below 50 million tonnes in sixteen years, a milestone reported by AFP in September 2026. For a crop that anchors European livestock feeding, such a decline forces a strategic conversation. Sorghum&#8217;s case is strengthened by the fact that it is not a speculative substitute: it is a proven cereal with established global production systems, and the new study provides the first continental-scale, data-driven assessment of how it would fare under European climate futures. The researchers conclude that their results highlight sorghum&#8217;s potential to help European agriculture adapt to climate change, offering a quantified, scenario-tested foundation for what has until now been a largely intuitive argument. As heat and water scarcity reshape the continent&#8217;s farmland, the crop that thrives where maize falters may be moving from the margins of European agriculture toward its center.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Projected expansion of sorghum production in Europe under climate change and its potential to replace maize in livestock feed</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Sorghum may help European agriculture face climate change</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Sorghum may help European agriculture face climate change. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1146684" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> sorghum, maize, climate change, European agriculture, livestock feed, machine learning, crop yields, water resources, irrigation, INRAE, Earth&#x27;s Future, food security</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">242515</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Milk Makes Staphylococcus aureus Thicker, Tougher and Harder to Treat</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/milk-makes-staphylococcus-aureus-thicker-tougher-and-harder-to-treat/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristina Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 02:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibiotic efficacy against S. aureus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antibiotic resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibiotic resistance in dairy infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteria growth in milk versus blood serum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial adaptation in mammary glands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial envelope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combination therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communications Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of milk on bacterial cell wall strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications for veterinary and clinical practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infectious disease research in dairy cattle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INRAE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INRAE and ENS Paris-Saclay microbiology studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mastitis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mastitis treatment challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milk lipids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[milk's impact on bacterial virulence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxidative stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathogen robustness in nutrient-rich environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pigment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staphylococcus aureus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veterinary Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virulence]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=233010</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An international team led by INRAE found that Staphylococcus aureus grown in milk builds a three-times-thicker envelope from milk lipids and produces more protective pigment, making it far more resistant to antibiotics and more virulent in mastitis infections.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Staphylococcus aureus has long been one of medicine&#8217;s most stubborn adversaries, a bacterium capable of thriving on skin, in wounds, and inside the mammary glands of humans and animals alike. Now an international research team coordinated by INRAE, the French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment, together with colleagues at ENS Paris-Saclay, has uncovered a striking reason why the pathogen is so difficult to eradicate in one particular setting: milk. According to their study, published in Communications Biology, S. aureus grown in milk becomes dramatically more robust and more virulent than the same bacterium grown in blood serum or in standard laboratory culture media. The finding carries immediate implications for how mastitis, the painful and economically costly infection of mammary tissue, is treated in both clinical and veterinary practice.</p>
<p>The researchers set out to understand why S. aureus so often withstands antibiotic therapy, focusing on two environments that matter during real infections. The first was milk, the nutrient-rich fluid produced by the mammary glands in which the bacterium naturally proliferates and triggers mastitis. The second was serum, the liquid component of blood that remains after cells and clotting proteins have been removed, and the environment in which S. aureus develops during systemic infection. By comparing bacterial growth under these two biologically relevant conditions, rather than relying solely on conventional laboratory media, the team hoped to capture features of the pathogen&#8217;s behavior that standard cultures might obscure. What they found was a remarkable degree of environmental dependence, with the bacterium&#8217;s physical architecture and defensive chemistry shifting substantially depending on where it grows.</p>
<p>The most dramatic difference emerged in the structure of the bacterial envelope, the combined membrane and cell wall that forms the bacterium&#8217;s outermost barrier. When S. aureus grows in milk, it does something unexpected: instead of synthesizing its own membrane lipids, it incorporates lipids directly from its surroundings. Milk lipids are thereby built into the bacterium&#8217;s envelope, and the result is an outer layer roughly three times thicker than that of bacteria grown in serum or in laboratory media. This thickened envelope is not merely a cosmetic change. Because many antibiotics act on the bacterial envelope, either by disrupting its construction or by breaching it to reach internal targets, a substantially thicker barrier can translate directly into reduced drug susceptibility.</p>
<p>The team tested the various classes of antibiotics commonly deployed against mastitis and found that milk-grown S. aureus was markedly more resistant across the board. The explanation lies in the interplay between the bacterium&#8217;s remodeled architecture and the mechanisms of the drugs themselves. Antibiotics that target the envelope face a barrier that has been reinforced with dietary lipids drawn from the milk environment. Meanwhile, antibiotics that kill by generating oxidative stress encounter a pathogen that has simultaneously bolstered its antioxidant defenses. In other words, the very environment in which the infection takes hold equips the bacterium with layered protection against the two main strategies clinicians use to destroy it.</p>
<p>That second line of defense centers on pigment. S. aureus takes its name from the golden-yellow pigment it produces, a carotenoid-type molecule that does far more than give the bacterium its distinctive color. The pigment acts as a molecular shield against oxidative stress, neutralizing the reactive oxygen species that immune cells and certain antibiotics use to damage bacterial cells, and it contributes directly to the organism&#8217;s virulence. The researchers discovered that milk lipids stimulate the bacterium to produce more of this pigment, leaving milk-grown cells both better protected from oxidative attack and more virulent during infection. A nutrient that might seem like simple food for the pathogen thus doubles as a signal and a raw material that amplifies its dangerousness.</p>
<p>Together, these observations reveal what the authors describe as a unique relationship between milk lipids and the severity of S. aureus infections. The bacterium does not merely survive in milk; it is transformed by it, assuming a thicker, more pigmented, more drug-tolerant form precisely where infections of the udder occur. This biotope-dependent behavior helps explain a persistent puzzle in mastitis management: why infections that appear susceptible to antibiotics in laboratory tests so often prove difficult to clear in the infected gland. A susceptibility test performed on bacteria grown in standard culture medium may simply not reflect the physiology of the same organism growing in the lipid-rich environment of milk.</p>
<p>The practical consequences could be significant. The researchers suggest that the bacterium&#8217;s exceptional robustness in milk may mean that antibiotic treatment protocols for mastitis need to be adapted when milk is abundant, a consideration that applies to humans as well as to domestic animals. In dairy farming, mastitis is among the most common and costly diseases, driving antibiotic use and raising concerns about residues in the food chain and the spread of resistance. If treatment regimens were calibrated to the enhanced resilience that milk confers on the pathogen, dosing strategies, drug choices, and treatment durations might all need revision. The study provides a mechanistic foundation for such changes, replacing trial-and-error adjustments with an understanding of why standard protocols fall short.</p>
<p>Encouragingly, the findings also point toward a potential solution. Research is already underway to develop combination therapies that pair an antibiotic with a molecule designed to prevent the bacterium from incorporating lipids from its environment. Such an approach would strike at the adaptation itself, denying S. aureus the raw materials it needs to thicken its envelope, while the antibiotic delivers the killing blow. If successful, this strategy could restore the effectiveness of existing drugs against milk-adapted bacteria without requiring entirely new antibiotics, an appealing prospect at a time when the antimicrobial development pipeline remains thin.</p>
<p>Beyond mastitis, the study speaks to a broader principle in microbiology: the environment a pathogen occupies is not a passive backdrop but an active participant in its virulence and drug resistance. S. aureus is frequently found in human and veterinary infections of many kinds, and its ability to withstand antibiotic treatment makes it a major clinical challenge worldwide. If a bacterium can remodel its own envelope using lipids scavenged from its surroundings, then the metabolic context of an infection site deserves the same attention as the genetic makeup of the pathogen itself. Laboratory culture conditions, however convenient, may systematically misrepresent the organism clinicians and veterinarians actually face.</p>
<p>The work, published under the title Biotope-dependent Resistance to Reactive Oxygen Species, Antibiotic Tolerance, and Virulence of Staphylococcus aureus, adds an important dimension to the fight against one of the world&#8217;s most consequential bacterial pathogens. It shows that the golden pigment and formidable defenses of S. aureus are not fixed traits but flexible responses to the local environment, and that milk, far from being an innocent medium, actively arms the bacterium against treatment. For the millions of people and animals affected by mastitis each year, and for the clinicians and farmers battling it, the message is clear: to defeat this pathogen, it may be necessary to change not just the drug, but the environment in which the battle takes place.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Environmental lipid-dependent antibiotic resistance and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus in milk</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Staphylococcus aureus is highly resistant and virulent in milk</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Staphylococcus aureus is highly resistant and virulent in milk. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1145929" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Staphylococcus aureus, mastitis, milk lipids, antibiotic resistance, bacterial envelope, virulence, pigment, oxidative stress, INRAE, Communications Biology, combination therapy, veterinary medicine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">233010</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Reverse-Engineer Insect Smell Receptors to Identify Moth Sex Pheromones</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/scientists-reverse-engineer-insect-smell-receptors-to-identify-moth-sex-pheromones/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 19:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biocontrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BMC Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly pest management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative methods in insect chemical ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INRAE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insect olfactory receptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insect pheromone detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insect reproductive behavior and chemical signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive pests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lily moth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mating disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular docking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular mechanisms of insect smell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular prediction of insect sex signals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moth sex pheromone identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olfactory receptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pheromone-based pest control strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pheromones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse-engineering insect scent receptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species-specific chemical communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spodoptera picta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[targeted pest control using pheromones]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=216927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[INRAE researchers used AI-predicted olfactory receptor structures to identify, for the first time, the sex pheromone of the lily moth, a reverse approach that could accelerate pheromone-based pest control.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more than half a century, one of the most powerful tools in environmentally friendly pest management has rested on a deceptively simple biological fact: many insects find their mates by following trails of scent. These chemical messengers, known as pheromones, are released by one sex and detected at astonishing sensitivity by the other, often across considerable distances. Because each species tends to use its own characteristic blend of molecules, pheromones offer a way to intervene in insect reproduction with a precision that broad-spectrum insecticides cannot match. Now, a team of researchers at the French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE) has demonstrated a fundamentally new way to unlock this chemical language, one that begins not with the insect itself but with the molecular machinery it uses to smell. The work, published in BMC Biology, provides proof of concept that the sex pheromone of a moth can be predicted from the structures of its olfactory receptors, opening a path to faster identification of pheromones for species that have never been chemically characterised.</p>
<p>The traditional route to identifying a sex pheromone has always been laborious. Researchers must typically maintain live colonies of the target insect, collect and extract the chemicals emitted by females, and then sift through a complex mixture of dozens or even hundreds of volatile compounds to determine which ones actually attract males. The timing of pheromone production matters enormously, since many species release their signals only during narrow windows of the day or night, and missing that window can mean missing the signal entirely. Once candidate compounds are isolated, each must be tested for behavioural activity, often through wind-tunnel experiments or field trials, before the true pheromone can be confirmed. For rare species, invasive pests that have just appeared in a new region, or insects that are difficult to rear in captivity, this process can stall for years, leaving pest managers without the species-specific tools that pheromone-based control depends on.</p>
<p>The INRAE team, working within the EXPLOR&#8217;AE Programme funded through the project known as Invoria, chose to invert this logic entirely. Rather than starting with the emitter of the chemical signal, they started with the receiver: the male moth, and more specifically, the olfactory receptors housed in his antennae that are tuned to detect the female&#8217;s scent. Their study species was the lily moth, Spodoptera picta, a strikingly coloured insect whose sexual communication had never been described. The lily moth is what biologists call a non-model organism: it is not a standard laboratory species with a rich history of prior research, and this was precisely the point. If the method could work on a poorly studied insect with no established toolkit, the researchers reasoned, it could likely be extended to many other species that currently resist conventional analysis.</p>
<p>The first step of the reverse approach relied on genomics. By analysing the genes of the lily moth and comparing them with those of related species, the researchers narrowed down a catalogue of candidate olfactory receptors to two promising candidates. This comparative step matters because receptor genes evolve alongside the chemicals they detect; receptors in closely related species that respond to similar pheromones often share detectable similarities in their sequences. From this genetic starting material, the team turned to artificial intelligence. Machine-learning tools were used to predict the three-dimensional structures of the two candidate receptors, generating models of the protein shapes that sit in the membranes of sensory neurons and cradle odorant molecules as they arrive from the air.</p>
<p>With structural models in hand, the researchers applied molecular docking, a computational technique widely used in drug discovery, to predict which volatile molecules would fit and bind within the receptors&#8217; binding pockets. Docking simulations evaluate how two molecules can interact spatially and energetically, scoring the likelihood that a given compound will make stable contact with a target protein. By screening a library of volatile compounds against the modelled receptors, the computational pipeline identified a specific molecule predicted to interact strongly with both candidate receptors: (Z,E)-9,11-tetradecadienyl acetate. In effect, the algorithm had proposed an answer to a question the insects had never been asked in the laboratory: what chemical does the female of this species use to signal her availability?</p>
<p>Prediction alone, however, is never sufficient in biology, and the team followed the computational phase with a rigorous sequence of experimental validation. First, the selected olfactory receptors were tested directly against the predicted volatile molecules using electrophysiological methods, which measure the electrical responses of sensory cells or expressed receptor proteins when exposed to chemical stimuli. The receptors responded, confirming computationally predicted interactions with real physiological activity. Next, the researchers combined physicochemical analysis with electrophysiology to verify two crucial facts: that female lily moths actually secrete the predicted compound as their sex pheromone, and that male moths can detect the volatile molecule in the air. These analytical steps confirmed that the AI-guided prediction matched what the insects themselves were doing.</p>
<p>The final and most demanding test was behavioural. A molecule may be detected by an antenna, but detection does not guarantee attraction; only a behavioural response demonstrates that the compound functions as a genuine pheromone in the life of the animal. In behavioural assays, the identified compound attracted male lily moths and elicited sexual behaviour, completing the chain of evidence from gene to receptor to molecule to mating behaviour. Taken together, the results show that an unknown pheromone of a non-model species could be identified through a pipeline that begins with sequencing, passes through AI-predicted receptor structures and molecular docking, and ends with classical electrophysiology and behavioural experiments. Each stage filtered and focused the search, dramatically reducing the number of candidate chemicals that needed laboratory testing.</p>
<p>The significance of this proof of concept extends well beyond a single moth species. Current, emerging and invasive crop pests are precisely the organisms for which pheromone identification is most urgently needed and most often missing, because invasive populations can spread faster than conventional chemical ecology can characterise them. Once a species&#8217; sex pheromone is known, two well-established biocontrol strategies become available. Mating disruption involves flooding an area, such as a crop field or orchard, with synthetic pheromone so that males become unable to locate females, crashing reproduction without any toxic chemical. Alternatively, pheromone-baited traps can be used to estimate population density, monitor invasions, or suppress populations through mass trapping. Both approaches are highly species-specific, sparing beneficial insects such as pollinators and natural enemies of pests, and both are compatible with the increasingly strict regulations governing pesticide use in gardens, parks and botanical collections.</p>
<p>The lily moth itself illustrates why such tools matter. The species is not found in mainland France and is therefore not considered a pest of concern there, which made it an ethically convenient and scientifically demanding test case. Yet elsewhere in the world, Spodoptera picta is a significant pest, particularly in private gardens, public parks and botanical gardens, settings where the use of conventional pest-control products is often tightly restricted and where ornamental plants suffer real damage. A validated pheromone-based method could give managers in those regions a targeted, low-toxicity option, and the study&#8217;s authors note that this work opens up the possibility of using pheromone-based methods to control the moth. In this sense, the research delivers both a general technique and a concrete practical outcome for a real agricultural problem.</p>
<p>There is also a deeper scientific payoff. Pheromones function as chemical signatures of species, and the molecules a species uses to communicate sexually contribute to reproductive isolation, helping to keep related species distinct. As a result, identifying the compounds that make up the pheromones of moths and other insects offers new insights into the evolutionary history of these lineages, revealing how chemical communication has diverged and shaped speciation. By making pheromone identification faster and less dependent on scarce live insects, the reverse chemical ecology approach demonstrated here could populate the field with many more of these chemical signatures, allowing biologists to reconstruct communication systems across entire groups of species. What began as a pest-management problem thus ends as a window onto evolution, powered by artificial intelligence, and a demonstration that sometimes the fastest way to understand a signal is to study the ear rather than the voice.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> AI-guided prediction of insect olfactory receptors to identify moth sex pheromones for crop protection</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Crop protection: a new method for understanding insect sexual communication</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Crop protection: a new method for understanding insect sexual communication. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1145311" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> pheromones, chemical ecology, olfactory receptors, Spodoptera picta, biocontrol, mating disruption, molecular docking, artificial intelligence, INRAE, BMC Biology, invasive pests, lily moth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">216927</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
