<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>inositol &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/inositol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:28:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Bacterial Duo Supercharges Olive Roots and Rewrites Their Chemical Signals</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/bacterial-duo-supercharges-olive-roots-and-rewrites-their-chemical-signals/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 15:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azospirillum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficial bacterial inoculation in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical signaling between roots and microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of bacteria on soil-plant nutrient exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inositol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean olive farming sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methylobacterium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial consortium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial ecology of olive roots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial influence on plant chemical signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olive cultivation and soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olive tree root microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic acids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant growth-promoting bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) in perennial crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-microbe interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root exudates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable crop growth practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TD-GC-MS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=230542</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Italian researchers found that inoculating olive plants with a consortium of Azospirillum and Methylobacterium boosted root and shoot biomass by up to 98.6 percent and reshaped root exudate chemistry toward organic acids, sugars, and previously undetectable inositol.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a greenhouse in Pisa, young olive trees have been quietly revealing one of the most intimate conversations in biology: the chemical dialogue between plant roots and the soil microbes that colonize them. A team of Italian researchers at the Sant&#8217;Anna School of Advanced Studies, the University of Pisa, and the Centre for Climate Change Impact has shown that inoculating olive plants with two beneficial bacterial genera, Azospirillum and Methylobacterium, does far more than simply stimulate growth. It fundamentally rewires the chemistry of what roots release into the surrounding soil, according to a study published in the journal Microbial Ecology.</p>
<p>The research, led by Livia Pappalettere and corresponding author Susanna Bartolini, focused on Olea europaea L. cv. Leccino, one of the most economically important woody crops in the Mediterranean basin. Plant growth-promoting bacteria, often abbreviated as PGPB, are increasingly applied to perennial crops as a sustainable alternative to synthetic fertilizers, yet their chemical footprints at the root-soil interface have remained poorly characterized in species like olive. The new study set out to close that gap with an unusually direct analytical approach.</p>
<p>Over a 12-week greenhouse trial running from early March to late May, the team applied three soil treatments monthly, for a total of three applications: a single strain of Azospirillum known as Sp245, a microbial consortium combining Azospirillum species with Methylobacterium symbioticum SB0023/3T, and a water control. In addition, Methylobacterium symbioticum was applied separately as a foliar spray, allowing the researchers to compare the effects of delivering the same beneficial microbe through leaves rather than roots.</p>
<p>The growth results were striking. The consortium treatment, labeled MIX in the study, produced the strongest overall performance, dramatically enhancing both primary and secondary root growth and increasing the dry matter of organs above and below ground. Compared with untreated control plants, root dry weight rose by 70.2 percent, stem dry weight by 98.6 percent, and leaf dry weight by 65.3 percent. These are substantial gains for a woody perennial over a single season, and they suggest that the two bacterial genera work synergistically rather than simply adding their individual effects together.</p>
<p>The foliar application of Methylobacterium symbioticum produced a different and equally interesting signature. Plants receiving the leaf treatment showed a unique boost in leaf surface area and chlorophyll index, with increases of 83.8 percent and 33.3 percent respectively relative to the control. This indicates that the foliar route primarily enhances photosynthetic capacity and canopy development, while the soil-borne consortium acts more powerfully on root architecture and whole-plant biomass. For growers, the two delivery strategies may ultimately serve complementary purposes.</p>
<p>But the most novel part of the study lies beneath the soil surface. The researchers chemically profiled the root exudates, the suite of compounds that roots actively secrete into the rhizosphere, using thermal desorption gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, or TD-GC-MS. The samples were derivatized in situ with HMDS, a silylating reagent that stabilizes polar compounds so they can be detected by the instrument. This technique allowed the team to capture a chemically resolved snapshot of the exudate profile directly, without the losses and artifacts that can come from more elaborate extraction procedures.</p>
<p>The analysis revealed four consistent classes of metabolites across the samples: organic acids including glycolic, lactic, and hydroxybutyric acids; glycerol; carbohydrates such as glucose and aldonic acid gamma-lactones; and inositol, for which the researchers detected seven distinct isomers. Within each of these classes, the treatments produced significant differences. The consortium treatment induced the highest signals for organic acids, carbohydrates, and inositol, with organic acid signals reaching approximately 17-fold higher than the control. Most tellingly, inositol was entirely undetectable in the control samples, meaning that its appearance in inoculated plants represents a genuine chemical novelty induced by the bacterial partnership.</p>
<p>Why does this matter? Root exudates are the currency of the rhizosphere. Plants spend a significant fraction of their photosynthetically fixed carbon on these secretions, and the composition of the exudate cocktail determines which microbes are attracted, fed, or repelled at the root surface. By shifting exudate chemistry toward organic acids, sugars, and inositol, the inoculated plants appear to be creating a more hospitable chemical environment for their bacterial partners, potentially reinforcing the beneficial association in a feedback loop. Organic acids can also mobilize mineral nutrients in the soil, while sugars and inositols serve as readily metabolizable carbon sources for rhizosphere communities.</p>
<p>The authors emphasize that this is, to their knowledge, the first chemically resolved TD-GC-MS characterization of olive root exudates under plant growth-promoting bacterial treatments. That claim carries weight for a crop of global significance. Olive cultivation faces mounting pressures from climate change, water scarcity, and soil degradation across the Mediterranean, and microbial inoculants are widely promoted as a low-input path to more resilient orchards. Yet until now, growers and scientists have had little direct chemical evidence of what these inoculants actually change at the root-soil interface in olive.</p>
<p>The study is explicitly preliminary, and the authors are careful about the scope of their conclusions. The work was conducted on greenhouse-grown young plants over a single season, and field validation across mature trees, different cultivars, and variable soils remains an obvious next step. The researchers also note that the accepted version of the article is being shared early under open access terms and is subject to further editorial refinement. Still, the combination of robust morphological measurements and high-resolution metabolite profiling provides a template for how future studies might disentangle the mechanisms behind microbial inoculation benefits.</p>
<p>For the broader field of microbial ecology, the findings add olive to a growing list of crops whose exudate chemistry is demonstrably remodelled by beneficial bacteria. They also highlight the value of consortium-based inoculants, which outperformed the single-strain treatment across most growth parameters and produced the most dramatic exudate shifts. As agriculture searches for tools to reduce fertilizer dependence, understanding the chemical language that roots and microbes share may prove as important as the microbes themselves. In the humble root secretions of a potted olive tree, the researchers have captured an early glimpse of that conversation in remarkable chemical detail.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculation on olive growth and root exudate chemistry</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Azospirillum–Methylobacterium Inoculation Enhances Olive Growth and Reshapes Root Exudate Chemistry: A Preliminary TD-GC-MS Characterization</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Pappalettere, L., Mattonai, M., Degano, I., Toffanin, A., &amp; Bartolini, S. (2026). Azospirillum–Methylobacterium Inoculation Enhances Olive Growth and Reshapes Root Exudate Chemistry: A Preliminary TD-GC-MS Characterization. <em>Microbial Ecology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02901-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02901-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02901-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00248-026-02901-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> plant growth-promoting bacteria, Azospirillum, Methylobacterium, olive, root exudates, TD-GC-MS, rhizosphere, inositol, organic acids, soil microbiology, microbial consortium, sustainable agriculture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">230542</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chemists Unveil Self-Driving Phosphate Migration Across Glycerol and Inositol Scaffolds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/chemists-unveil-self-driving-phosphate-migration-across-glycerol-and-inositol-scaffolds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 20:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autonomous phosphate transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomimetic phosphate migration mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyclic phosphodiester intermediates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glycerol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glycerol and inositol scaffolds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative methods in organic synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inositol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphate migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphate migration in synthetic chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphate movement along hydroxyl groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphate relocations in molecular scaffolds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphodiester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphoryl transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorylation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorylation without external reagents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prebiotic chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prebiotic chemistry and phosphoryl transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reaction cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regioselectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-driving phosphodiester reactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simplified synthesis of phosphorylated metabolites]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=202036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chemists have shown that a phosphate group can migrate on its own along glycerol and inositol scaffolds through a self-sustaining phosphodiester reaction cycle.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phosphate groups sit at the heart of biology. They energize cells, switch proteins on and off, and form the backbone of DNA. In synthetic chemistry, however, moving a phosphate from one hydroxyl position on a molecule to another has traditionally demanded a labor-intensive sequence of protection, activation, and deprotection steps. A new study published in Nature Chemistry now reports a remarkably elegant alternative: a phosphate group that migrates autonomously along glycerol and inositol scaffolds, driven by nothing more than a self-sustaining phosphodiester reaction cycle. The finding promises to simplify the synthesis of phosphorylated metabolites and may illuminate how certain phosphoryl-transfer processes could have operated in prebiotic chemistry.</p>
<p>The research, published under the title Autonomous migration of a phosphate group along glycerol and inositol scaffolds driven by a phosphodiester reaction cycle, demonstrates that a single phosphate substituent can walk from one oxygen atom to the next along a polyhydroxylated carbon framework without external reagents or catalysts. The driving force is a reaction cycle in which cyclic phosphodiester intermediates form, open, and re-form, each turnover relocating the phosphoryl group to an adjacent hydroxyl. In effect, the scaffold itself acts as both the track and the vehicle, while the phosphate acts as a cargo that repeatedly detaches and reattaches at neighboring positions.</p>
<p>At the core of the mechanism is the well-known tendency of vicinal diols, pairs of hydroxyl groups on adjacent carbon atoms, to engage in reversible phosphoryl transfer. When a phosphate ester is installed on one hydroxyl of a glycerol derivative, the neighboring hydroxyl can intramolecularly attack the phosphorus center, displacing the original ester oxygen and generating a cyclic phosphodiester, a five-membered ring in which the phosphate bridges two adjacent oxygens. Hydrolytic or transesterifying opening of that ring can then occur at either of the two phosphorus–oxygen bonds, and if the alternative bond is broken, the phosphate ends up attached to the opposite hydroxyl. Repeating this sequence steps the phosphate along the carbon chain one position at a time.</p>
<p>Crucially, the researchers showed that this is not a one-off rearrangement but a genuine catalytic cycle. The system recycles the key intermediates: formation of the cyclic phosphodiester, nucleophilic ring opening, and re-closure constitute a closed loop of reactions that consumes no stoichiometric reagent in its idealized form. Thermodynamics plays the role of the referee. Because different phosphate esters along the scaffold have slightly different stabilities, influenced by steric congestion, hydrogen bonding, and ring strain in the intermediates, the migration is not random. Over time, the distribution of phosphorylated isomers equilibrates, and under the reported conditions the population shifts toward the thermodynamically favored positions on the glycerol and inositol frameworks.</p>
<p>Glycerol, the simplest triol and the structural basis of all cellular lipids, provided the minimal test bed. The team followed the migration of a phosphate group among the three available hydroxyl positions, distinguishing the primary termini from the secondary center. Inositol, a cyclohexane hexol bearing six hydroxyl groups in a defined stereochemical arrangement, presented a far more demanding challenge. Inositol phosphates, including the ubiquitous signaling molecule inositol trisphosphate and the storage compound phytic acid, feature phosphoryl groups at specific positions, and their synthesis has historically required elaborate protecting-group choreography. The demonstration that phosphate can move under its own motive chemistry across such a scaffold suggests new, shorter routes to these biologically important molecules.</p>
<p>The experimental strategy relied on careful kinetic and structural characterization. By monitoring reaction mixtures over time and quantifying the distribution of regioisomeric phosphate esters, the researchers mapped the pathways of migration and confirmed that isomerization proceeds through the predicted cyclic intermediates. Control experiments with substrates in which neighboring hydroxyls were blocked or removed arrested the migration, consistent with a mechanism that requires an adjacent free hydroxyl to launch each phosphoryl-transfer step. The dependence of migration rates on conditions such as solvent and added water further supported a cycle in which proton transfer and nucleophilic attack are tightly coupled.</p>
<p>Beyond its synthetic utility, the work carries conceptual weight for origins-of-life chemistry. Phosphorylation in water is notoriously difficult because inorganic phosphate is a poor electrophile and its esters are kinetically stable. Yet plausible prebiotic scenarios must explain how phosphorylated sugars, glycerol derivatives, and nucleotides arose. A reaction cycle that autonomously relocates phosphate groups among polyols, without enzymes or activated reagents, offers a model for how positional phosphorylation patterns could have been explored and reshuffled on the early Earth. In such a picture, cyclic phosphodiester intermediates, long considered mere synthetic curiosities, would serve as the engines of a primitive phosphoryl economy.</p>
<p>For laboratory chemists, the immediate implication is a shortcut. Preparing a specific glycerophosphate or inositol phosphate isomer may no longer require installing protecting groups on every hydroxyl and uninstalling them afterward. Instead, one could install a phosphate anywhere on the scaffold and allow the migration cycle to redistribute it, then trap the desired isomer by adjusting conditions or by selective derivatization. The approach converts a regioselectivity problem, one of the most persistent headaches in phosphate chemistry, into an equilibration problem that can be steered by thermodynamic control. The same logic may extend to scaffolds beyond glycerol and inositol, including carbohydrates, nucleoside analogues, and other polyhydroxylated natural products.</p>
<p>The study also adds to a growing body of research on molecular systems that perform directed motion or autonomous reorganization without external intervention. Whereas synthetic molecular machines typically require light, fuel, or ratcheted energy input to achieve directional movement, the phosphate migration described here achieves net repositioning through energy differences between final states rather than through kinetic gating. That distinction makes it less a motor and more a self-sorting shuttle, but it is precisely this simplicity, no fuel, no catalyst, no external signal, that makes the chemistry robust and potentially relevant far outside the specialized laboratory in which it was discovered.</p>
<p>As with any equilibration-driven process, selectivity has limits: isomers that are close in energy will coexist, and applications demanding a single regioisomer will still require a trapping or amplification strategy. Nevertheless, the demonstration that a phosphate group can autonomously tour a biologically central scaffold, driven by a closed phosphodiester cycle, reframes a classic problem in organic chemistry. What once demanded stepwise mechanical manipulation of functional groups can now be viewed as a dynamic system that finds its own way, offering chemists a new dial for controlling the placement of one of nature&#8217;s most indispensable chemical ornaments.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Autonomous intramolecular migration of phosphate groups on polyol scaffolds via a phosphodiester reaction cycle</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Autonomous migration of a phosphate group along glycerol and inositol scaffolds driven by a phosphodiester reaction cycle</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hoffmann, P. A., Saha, S., Volk, S., Sun, J., Englert, A., &amp; von Delius, M. (2026). Autonomous migration of a phosphate group along glycerol and inositol scaffolds driven by a phosphodiester reaction cycle. <em>Nature Chemistry</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-026-02240-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-026-02240-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-026-02240-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41557-026-02240-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> phosphate migration, phosphodiester, glycerol, inositol, phosphorylation, reaction cycle, organic chemistry, Nature Chemistry, prebiotic chemistry, regioselectivity, polyols, phosphoryl transfer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">202036</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
