<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>immune signaling &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/immune-signaling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 01:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Immune Signaling Complexes Revealed as Unexpected Master Regulators of the MYC Oncogene</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/immune-signaling-complexes-revealed-as-unexpected-master-regulators-of-the-myc-oncogene/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCL10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BCL10 and MALT1 functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CARD10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CARD11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CARD14]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CARD9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBM complex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBM complex in immune signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease implications of CBM and MYC interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immune signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immune signaling in cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intersection of immune and oncogenic pathways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keratinocytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MALT1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular mechanisms of cell proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MYC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MYC oncogene regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NF-κB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NF-κB signaling pathway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation of MYC expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of CARD-CC proteins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signalosomes in cell signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcription factor amplification]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=292246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new perspective article argues that CBM immune signaling complexes regulate the MYC oncogene through transcription, physical binding, and protein degradation, expanding their influence far beyond NF-κB.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For decades, immunologists have studied the CBM complex—a molecular machine assembled from CARD-CC proteins, BCL10, and MALT1—as a dedicated switchboard for inflammatory NF-κB signaling. A new perspective article published in Frontiers in Molecular Medicine argues that this view is far too narrow. Writing from Cincinnati Children&#8217;s Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Stanley B. DeVore and Gurjit K. Khurana Hershey synthesize a growing body of evidence showing that CBM signalosomes also control MYC, the transcription factor that governs cell proliferation, metabolism, differentiation, and survival in virtually every tissue of the body. The convergence of these two signaling systems, the authors suggest, may explain disease features that NF-κB-centric models have never fully accounted for.</p>
<p>MYC is not an ordinary transcription factor. Beyond directly activating target genes, it operates as a global amplifier of all active genes, boosting both transcriptional activators and the core transcriptional machinery itself. Because even modest changes in MYC protein levels can shift cellular behavior or trigger oncogenesis, the protein is regulated at nearly every conceivable level: multiple promoters and cis-regulatory elements control its transcription, RNA-binding proteins and microRNAs shape its transcript stability and translation, and post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, acetylation, and ubiquitination tune its stability and activity. Canonical degradation proceeds through the proteasome, but recent work has revealed additional routes, including selective autophagy in keratinocytes—a mechanism since observed in colorectal cancer—and K63-linked polyubiquitination by TRAF6 in myeloid cells, which counters an activating acetylation mark and prevents leukemogenesis.</p>
<p>The stakes of getting MYC regulation wrong are enormous. Unchecked MYC signaling drives uncontrolled proliferation and metabolic reprogramming, undermines tumor-suppressive mechanisms, and promotes genomic instability. Hematological malignancies of B-cells, T-cells, plasma cells, and myeloid lineages are frequently driven by or associated with MYC dysregulation, while epithelial cancers—including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, its precursor actinic keratosis, and carcinomas of the head and neck, lung, esophagus, and colon—also bear its fingerprint. Within the immune system, MYC directs the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in hematopoietic stem cells, guides B- and T-cell development, sustains myeloid populations, and maintains the epithelial barriers that form the body&#8217;s first line of defense against allergens and microbes.</p>
<p>The CBM complexes, meanwhile, are built around four paralogs of the CARD-CC family: CARD9, CARD10, CARD11, and CARD14. Each paralog occupies a distinct cellular niche—CARD9 in myeloid cells, CARD10 in endothelia and solid organs, CARD11 in lymphoid cells, and CARD14 in epidermal and mucosal epithelia—yet all can assemble supramolecular signalosomes with BCL10 and MALT1. In their inactive state, CARD-CC proteins are locked in an autoinhibited conformation; upstream receptors relieve this inhibition through post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation, and many disease-associated gain-of-function mutations bypass this control entirely by altering residues within the autoinhibitory regions. Once activated, the complexes recruit TRAF6-mediated K63-linked polyubiquitination to ignite NF-κB signaling, while MALT1&#8217;s protease activity cleaves deubiquitinases that would otherwise dismantle the polyubiquitin chains, potentiating the inflammatory output.</p>
<p>The clearest evidence for CBM-MYC crosstalk comes from CARD11, the paralog best known for its role in T-cell and B-cell receptor signaling. In mantle cell lymphoma, BCR-driven CARD11-MALT1 signaling sustains MYC activity by reducing its proteasomal degradation, and the proliferation and survival of MCL cell lines prove dependent on this pathway. MYC levels also drop in splenocytes carrying catalytically inactive MALT1, showing that the mechanism operates in untransformed B-cells as well. Yet the relationship is not simply additive: in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, gain-of-function CARD11 mutants appear to act as a second hit alongside constitutively expressed MYC, hinting that the two pathways are independent but complementary contributors to lymphomagenesis.</p>
<p>Regulatory T cells tell a different story. Rosenbaum and colleagues demonstrated that CARD11-MYC signaling induces Myc mRNA expression in Tregs, enhancing their proliferation and the mitochondrial metabolism these cells preferentially use. Unlike in B-cells, CBM signaling in Tregs does not affect MYC proteasomal degradation, and MALT1-MYC signaling protects mice against fatal autoimmune disease. Strikingly, mice with protease-dead MALT1 resemble mice lacking MYC specifically in Tregs, supporting the idea that CARD11-MYC operates as a separate but cooperative arm alongside CARD11-NF-κB in regulatory T-cell biology. Because Treg defects associated with CARD11 deficiency are not fully rescued by NF-κB restoration alone, MYC may fill a crucial gap in explaining these phenotypes. Effector T-cells depend on both proteins too—MYC for metabolic reprogramming upon activation, CARD11 for cytokine expression and proliferation—though MALT1 paracaspase activity did not appear to influence MYC mRNA or mitochondrial metabolism in conventional CD4-positive T-cells, leaving open questions about how CARD11 might regulate MYC in these cells.</p>
<p>In the skin, CARD14 has emerged as a direct physical regulator of MYC with profound consequences for barrier integrity. After linking the CARD14 R820W variant to reduced epidermal filaggrin expression in children with atopic dermatitis, DeVore&#8217;s group found that keratinocytes carrying the variant showed prominently decreased MYC transcriptional signatures despite only subtle changes in NF-κB signaling. CARD14 did not alter MYC expression or proteasomal degradation; instead, it physically interacted with MYC in a manner dependent on variant and activation status. Activation of wild-type CARD14 promoted MYC dissociation from the complex, nuclear localization, and transcriptional activity, whereas the R820W variant and MALT1 inhibition kept MYC tethered to the CBM and funneled it toward autophagic degradation. Dysregulated CARD14-MYC signaling impaired keratinocyte proliferation, differentiation, and barrier function, and skin expressing psoriasis-associated gain-of-function CARD14 mutants displayed both elevated MYC signatures and classic psoriatic features such as epidermal hyperproliferation and parakeratosis. Most recently, CARD14 was shown to drive osteoclast differentiation in a MYC-dependent fashion, binding MYC directly, enhancing its stability, and promoting its nuclear translation while simultaneously activating NF-κB and MAPK pathways.</p>
<p>CARD9 and CARD10 remain more speculative territory. CARD9, the myeloid paralog essential for antifungal immunity, may actually suppress MYC: pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, which require CARD9 signaling, downregulate MYC, whereas CARD9 deficiency promotes polarization toward M2 macrophages that depend on MYC for activation and even carry it as a cellular marker. This antagonism suggests that strong CARD9 signaling may suppress MYC to drive M1 polarization, while reduced signaling disinhibits MYC and permits M2 polarization—though direct studies are still needed. In myeloid progenitors, TLR2 signaling through MyD88 and TRAF6 suppresses MYC and blocks progression to acute myeloid leukemia, and because TLR2-MyD88 signaling can also activate the CARD9 CBM complex, which likewise employs TRAF6, CARD9 could plausibly contribute to this tumor-suppressive MYC downregulation. CARD10, expressed in endothelia, smooth muscle, and various epithelia, has never been directly tested for MYC regulation, but CARD10 knockdown reduced β-catenin-mediated MYC expression and blunted invasion and proliferation of bladder carcinoma cells, with β-catenin overexpression rescuing both—hinting at a possible CARD10-β-catenin-MYC axis. Notably, many cancer-associated CARD10 mutations do not affect NF-κB signaling at all, raising the possibility that MYC or other pathways carry the functional impact instead.</p>
<p>The authors propose a unifying structural clue: CARD9 lacks the membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) domain that is predicted in silico to bind MYC, which could explain why it suppresses rather than promotes MYC signaling, and why the MAGUK-deficient splice variant CARD14sh might behave similarly. Whether the MAGUK domain is genuinely required for MYC promotion remains an open experimental question. What is already clear is that CBM-dependent MYC regulation is cell-type and paralog-specific—CARD11 affects MYC proteasomal degradation in B-cells but not Tregs, and CARD11 but not CARD14 influences MYC transcription—so future studies must map which layers of MYC control each complex touches, from transcript stability and translation to post-translational modification by TRAF6-mediated ubiquitination.</p>
<p>The broader implication is that CBM complexes coordinate two parallel output channels: the canonical NF-κB arm and the newly recognized MYC arm, working in functional complementarity. B-cell and Treg development depend partially on both CARD11-MYC and CARD11-NF-κB signaling; the physical skin barrier built through CARD14-MYC complements the chemical barrier of antimicrobial peptides and cytokines driven by CARD14-NF-κB; and both pathways promote osteoclastogenesis. This dual-channel architecture may finally explain the pleiotropic presentations of CBM-associated diseases, from combined immunodeficiency and atopy syndromes such as CADINS and BENTA to psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, and lymphoid malignancies. For drug developers, the message is significant: therapies targeting MALT1 protease activity or CBM assembly are already in clinical pipelines, and understanding how these interventions ripple through MYC-dependent programs could reveal why some patients respond differently than expected—and open entirely new therapeutic angles for MYC-driven cancers and inflammatory diseases alike.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Regulation of the MYC transcription factor by CARD-CC-BCL10-MALT1 signaling complexes</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> MYC is in the CARDs: CBM complexes coordinate immune and MYC-dependent cellular function</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> DeVore, S. B., &amp; Khurana Hershey, G. K. (2025). MYC is in the CARDs: CBM complexes coordinate immune and MYC-dependent cellular function. <em>Frontiers in Molecular Medicine, 5</em>, Article 1731823. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmmed.2025.1731823" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmmed.2025.1731823</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmmed.2025.1731823" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3389/fmmed.2025.1731823</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> MYC, CBM complex, CARD11, CARD14, CARD9, CARD10, NF-κB, MALT1, BCL10, immune signaling, cancer, keratinocytes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">292246</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bacteria Detect Viral Proteases to Trigger Immune Response</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/bacteria-detect-viral-proteases-to-trigger-immune-response/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristina Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antibiotic resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial antiviral defense mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial detection of viral enzymes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial detection of viral invasion beyond genetic material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial immune response to viral proteases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial-virus interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteriophage evasion of bacterial immunity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteriophages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBASS bacterial immune pathway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBASS pathway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development of phage therapy against antibiotic-resistant bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[host-pathogen interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immune signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative bacterial immunity research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecular Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phage therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phage therapy and bacterial immune evasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncovers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral enzyme-triggered bacterial defenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral protease sensing in bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral proteases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=226879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research reveals that bacteria detect viral proteases to trigger a self-destructive immune response, offering a pathway for developing more effective phage therapies.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the relentless biological arms race between bacteria and the viruses that prey upon them, researchers have uncovered a fundamental mechanism by which bacterial cells detect viral invasion. This discovery, published in the journal Science, reveals that bacteria do not always rely on detecting viral genetic material to trigger their defenses. Instead, they can sense the direct action of viral enzymes on specific host proteins. This finding provides a critical new understanding of bacterial immunity and opens significant avenues for developing bacteriophages, or phages, that can evade these defenses to treat dangerous bacterial infections without harming human cells.</p>
<p>Bacteriophages are viruses that specifically infect and kill bacteria. They have emerged as a rapidly evolving therapeutic option for treating bacterial infections, particularly those caused by antibiotic-resistant strains. Unlike traditional antibiotics, which can disrupt the entire microbiome and contribute to resistance, phages target specific bacterial species while leaving human cells unharmed. However, the effectiveness of phage therapy is often limited by the bacteria&#8217;s own immune systems. Bacteria have evolved sophisticated mechanisms to detect and neutralize phages, a challenge that researchers have long sought to overcome to create more robust viral antibiotics.</p>
<p>The new research focuses on a specific bacterial immune pathway known as CBASS, or cyclic nucleotide-based anti-phage signaling system. This pathway acts as a last-resort defense mechanism for the bacterium. When activated, the CBASS system leads to a self-destructive response that kills the infected bacterium. By sacrificing the individual cell, the bacterium prevents the virus from replicating and spreading to neighboring cells in the population. This drastic measure underscores the severity of the threat posed by viral infection and highlights the necessity for precise and rapid detection of the viral trigger.</p>
<p>Sam Hobbs, PhD, an assistant professor of biochemistry at the University of Utah Health and the first author of the study, led the team that identified the specific trigger for this immune response. Previous understanding of related antiviral pathways suggested that they were activated by the presence of viral DNA or RNA. However, Hobbs and his colleagues discovered a completely different mechanism. They found that certain phages produce a protein enzyme called a protease, which degrades other proteins. The research demonstrated that this viral protease directly acts on a specific host protein within the bacterium, effectively cutting an important sensor molecule.</p>
<p>This direct enzymatic action serves as the signal that turns on the entire CBASS signaling pathway. The discovery is significant because it shows that bacteria can detect the functional activity of viral components rather than just their physical presence. Hobbs described this finding as a eureka moment, noting that it is one of the most common forms of bacterial immunity. The fact that this mechanism had remained elusive until now highlights the complexity of bacterial defense systems. Understanding how the protease interacts with the host sensor provides a detailed molecular map of the initial steps in the bacterial immune response to phage infection.</p>
<p>The implications of this discovery extend beyond the immediate development of better phage therapies. By understanding how bacteria detect phage proteases, researchers can engineer phages that lack these specific enzymes or modify them to avoid triggering the CBASS pathway. This could lead to the creation of phages that are more effective at infecting and killing bacteria without activating the bacterial self-destruct mechanism. Such engineered phages could be crucial in treating infections where standard phages fail due to bacterial immunity, offering a new tool in the fight against antibiotic-resistant superbugs.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the study provides insights into the evolutionary history of immune systems. The CBASS pathway in bacteria is related to a similar immune pathway found in humans. This conservation across such distant lineages suggests that this type of immune signaling has persisted since bacteria and humans shared a common ancestor billions of years ago. The fact that cells in both domains of life have maintained this pathway indicates its fundamental importance in the ability to fight viral infections. Hobbs noted that this evolutionary continuity makes the system incredibly fascinating and provides a window into what is essential for maintaining antiviral defense capabilities.</p>
<p>Bacteria, with their rapid life cycles, serve as excellent models for studying these immune mechanisms. Scientists can use bacterial systems to quickly answer questions about how immune signaling works, which can then be tested in models closer to humans. This translational potential makes the study of bacterial immunity valuable not only for developing phage therapies but also for understanding broader principles of host defense. The ability to manipulate and observe these pathways in bacteria allows for high-throughput experimentation that would be difficult or impossible in more complex organisms.</p>
<p>The research was supported by several major funding organizations, including the Pew Biomedical Scholars program, the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, and the National Institutes of Health. The findings are published in Science under the title &#8220;Phage proteases activate CBASS antiphage immunity.&#8221; The study represents a significant step forward in the field of viral science, providing a detailed mechanistic understanding of how bacteria defend against viral threats. As the global burden of antibiotic-resistant infections continues to rise, the development of effective phage therapies remains a priority. This new knowledge equips researchers with the tools to design phages that can bypass bacterial immune defenses, potentially revolutionizing the treatment of bacterial diseases.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the interplay between bacteria and phages is a dynamic and evolving process. As bacteria evolve new defenses, phages must evolve new strategies to overcome them. The discovery of the protease-triggered CBASS pathway adds another layer to this complex interaction. By continuing to unravel the mechanisms of bacterial immunity, scientists can stay ahead of the curve in developing effective viral antibiotics. This research not only advances our understanding of microbial ecology but also holds promise for practical medical applications that could save lives in the face of growing antibiotic resistance.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Mechanism of CBASS activation by phage proteases in bacterial immunity</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Research uncovers how bacteria fight viruses, opening the door to better virus-based antibiotics</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Research uncovers how bacteria fight viruses, opening the door to better virus-based antibiotics. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1145696" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> bacteriophages, bacterial immunity, CBASS pathway, phage therapy, antibiotic resistance, viral proteases, host-pathogen interaction, molecular biology, immune signaling, Science journal, Research, uncovers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">226879</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
