<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hydrothermal carbonization &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/hydrothermal-carbonization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 19:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Sewage Sludge Treatment May Transform, Not Destroy, Microplastics in Wastewater</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/sewage-sludge-treatment-may-transform-not-destroy-microplastics-in-wastewater/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 19:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circular economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of hydrothermal processes on microplastic pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of microplastics in wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fate of PET and polystyrene microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrochar production from sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal carbonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal carbonization wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastic pollution in water treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastic pollution mitigation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microplastic transformation in sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics in urban wastewater management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics migration during sludge processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics removal challenges in biosolids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymer degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polystyrene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater microplastics contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=197952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research shows hydrothermal carbonization transforms rather than eliminates PET and polystyrene microplastics in sewage sludge, transferring substantial organic load into process water.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hydrothermal carbonization has been hailed as one of the most promising ways to deal with the mountains of sewage sludge that modern cities produce every day, a process that uses hot, pressurized water to convert wet organic waste into a carbon-rich solid called hydrochar without the need for energy-hungry drying. But a nagging question has lingered beneath the enthusiasm: what actually happens to the microplastics that concentrate in sludge during wastewater treatment? A new study from researchers at AGH University of Krakow in Poland, published in Energy Reports, offers one of the most detailed answers yet, and its conclusions are more sobering than the optimistic headlines suggest. Under the very conditions used to process sewage sludge, the two dominant microplastic pollutants in biosolids are not eliminated. They are transformed, and much of their material migrates into the process water, where it could pose new treatment challenges.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Zuzanna Prus-Frączek and including senior authors Katarzyna Styszko and Małgorzata Wilk, focused on polyethylene terephthalate, or PET, the polymer of water bottles and food packaging, and polystyrene, or PS, the aromatic plastic found in insulation, packaging foam, and countless disposable items. Both are among the most common polymers recovered from treated sludge, which can harbor hundreds to thousands of microplastic particles per kilogram of dry matter. Because European Union policy increasingly promotes the reuse of sludge as fertilizer and soil amendment on farmland, understanding whether hydrothermal treatment truly breaks these particles down is not an academic detail. It is central to whether plastic pollution quietly rides the circular economy back into the food chain.</p>
<p>Earlier studies had reported that hydrothermal carbonization can slash the number of microplastic particles detectable in sludge by up to 90 percent, with one study showing removal of particles larger than 50 micrometers jumping from about 11 percent to 85 percent as temperatures rose from 170 to 220 degrees Celsius. But a reduction in detectable particles is not the same as destruction. Fragments can shatter below the size limits of analytical instruments, and polymer-derived compounds can dissolve into the surrounding water without ever being mineralized. The Polish team set out to determine which of these fates actually befalls PET and PS, treating the two polymers separately in pure water at 220 degrees Celsius for one, two, and three hours, conditions carefully chosen to mirror real sewage sludge processing while eliminating interference from sludge-derived organic matter.</p>
<p>The results revealed a striking asymmetry between the two plastics. PET, whose backbone contains ester bonds that water can chemically attack, proved far more vulnerable. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that its degradation onset temperature, which stands at roughly 402 degrees Celsius in the raw polymer, plummeted to between 246 and 284 degrees Celsius after treatment. The pyrolytic residue left at 800 degrees Celsius collapsed from 12.7 percent to as little as 1.3 percent, indicating a severely diminished tendency to form stable carbon structures. Infrared and Raman spectroscopy painted a consistent picture: the sharp ester carbonyl band at 1714 inverse centimeters gave way to new dominant components near 1671 to 1677 inverse centimeters, signaling a heterogeneous mix of partially hydrolyzed ester bonds and newly formed oxygen-containing structures. Scanning electron microscopy showed surfaces transformed from smooth and compact into rough, cracked, and cavity-riddled landscapes.</p>
<p>Polystyrene, by contrast, emerged from the reactor remarkably intact. Its hydrophobic aromatic skeleton, held together by carbon-carbon bonds that water cannot easily cleave, resisted the conditions that visibly weakened PET. Treated PS samples retained a single-step thermal degradation profile with maximum decomposition temperatures of around 416 to 417 degrees Celsius, essentially unchanged from the raw material. The principal FTIR and Raman bands, including the characteristic aromatic ring breathing mode near 1001 inverse centimeters, remained within measurement uncertainty of their original positions. Only slight band broadening after three hours hinted at limited local disorder at the surface. The finding aligns with earlier work showing that complete PS decomposition demands 360 degrees Celsius and four hours, conditions far more severe than any sewage sludge reactor would employ.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential discovery came from analyzing the process water itself. When the researchers measured chemical oxygen demand and total organic carbon in the liquid phase, PET proved to be a prodigious polluter. Normalized to the initial polymer mass, PET released approximately 737 to 876 milligrams of COD and 320 to 343 milligrams of TOC per gram of plastic into the water, with absolute concentrations reaching 6145 to 7300 milligrams per liter of COD and around 2700 to 2855 milligrams per liter of TOC. Polystyrene, in comparison, contributed only 35 to 83 milligrams of COD and 99 to 140 milligrams of TOC per gram of polymer. The pH of the PET process water remained stubbornly acidic, between 3.8 and 3.9, consistent with the accumulation of acidic products from ester bond cleavage, while phenolic compounds slowly increased with longer treatment, suggesting the formation of refractory aromatic derivatives that resist further degradation.</p>
<p>These numbers carry a direct message for engineers designing full-scale sludge hydrothermal carbonization plants. Process water from sludge HTC is already heavily loaded with dissolved organics and can contain inhibitory or toxic compounds, and adding a substantial polymer-derived burden, particularly from PET-rich sludge, would amplify the challenge of treating or safely recirculating that water. Previous pilot-scale studies have shown that biological treatment of HTC process water can achieve COD removals of roughly 71 to 75 percent in membrane bioreactors and sequencing batch reactors, but the researchers caution that the added plastic-derived load could strain these systems further. Hydrochar yields added another layer of nuance: the most intensive apparent conversion for both polymers occurred at two hours, with yields for PS dropping to 75.6 percent and PET to 53.6 percent, and the non-monotonic trends hint at competing processes of depolymerization, dissolution, and secondary condensation of soluble intermediates back onto the solid phase.</p>
<p>The environmental implications extend beyond the treatment plant. Hydrochar from PET-containing sludge, with its weakened structure and earlier degradation onset, would likely be more susceptible to further fragmentation, oxidation, and weathering if applied to soils, potentially generating new generations of smaller plastic particles. The dramatic reduction in pyrolytic residue also suggests a diminished capacity for stable carbon sequestration in PET-derived char, undermining one of the climate arguments for hydrochar use in agriculture. Polystyrene-derived material, meanwhile, may remain embedded within or incorporated into the carbonized matrix despite surface alteration, retaining its aromatic identity. In neither case does the plastic vanish. As the authors put it, HTC should be understood primarily as a polymer-transformation and redistribution process, shifting material between the solid, liquid, and gas phases rather than eliminating it from the system.</p>
<p>The study does have limits that the team acknowledges candidly. The experiments used pristine, manually fragmented waste plastics in distilled water at a single temperature, rather than environmentally aged particles in a real sludge matrix, and the analyses could not identify specific molecular transformation products, distinguish hydrolysis from oxidation, or assess nanoplastic formation because samples were ground before imaging. Future work, the researchers argue, should incorporate real sewage sludge, replicate experiments across broader operating windows, and deploy gas and liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry to identify individual compounds, alongside leaching and ecotoxicity tests to evaluate the fate of released organics in soils. For now, the message for the water sector is clear and somewhat uncomfortable: hydrothermal carbonization remains a valuable technology for valorizing wet sludge, but claims of microplastic removal must be read as claims of microplastic transformation, and any credible plant design must treat the process water as a first-class waste stream, not an afterthought.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Hydrothermal carbonization of PET and polystyrene microplastics under sewage sludge treatment conditions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Hydrothermal carbonization of PET and PS microplastics under conditions relevant to sewage sludge treatment</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Prus-Frączek, Z., Kalemba-Rec, I., Magdziarz, A., Dróżdż, A., Chwiej, J., Styszko, K., &amp; Wilk, M. (2026). Hydrothermal carbonization of PET and PS microplastics under conditions relevant to sewage sludge treatment. <em>Energy Reports, 16</em>, Article 109697. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109697" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109697</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109697" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109697</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> microplastics, hydrothermal carbonization, sewage sludge, PET, polystyrene, hydrochar, process water, wastewater treatment, COD, TOC, polymer degradation, circular economy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">197952</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tea Waste Transformed into Magnetic Material That Captures Toxic Chromium</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/tea-waste-transformed-into-magnetic-material-that-captures-toxic-chromium/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 02:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromium removal from contaminated water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circular economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly water treatment methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metal adsorption techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hexavalent chromium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal carbonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal synthesis of biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iron oxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-cost adsorbents for industrial wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic biochar for water purification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen doping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen-doped magnetic carbon materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One-step]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution remediation using bio-based materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[removal of hexavalent chromium from water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reuse of beverage industry waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable waste-to-resource conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tea waste recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water treatment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=184352</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers converted spent tea leaves into a nitrogen- and iron-doped magnetic biochar that removed up to 96.90 percent of hexavalent chromium from water.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discarded tea leaves could become an unexpected tool for cleaning polluted water. In a study published in the <em>Journal of Saudi Chemical Society</em>, researchers converted spent tea residues from a beverage factory into a nitrogen-doped magnetic biochar capable of removing hexavalent chromium from water. The material, called NMTB, combines a porous carbon framework with iron and nitrogen sites introduced during a single hydrothermal treatment. Under optimized conditions, it removed 96.90 percent of Cr(VI) from a laboratory solution and reached a maximum adsorption capacity of 63.03 milligrams per gram. The approach links two environmental problems that are expanding together: the accumulation of organic waste from the rapidly growing tea-beverage industry and contamination by a highly mobile, hazardous form of chromium. Rather than treating tea residues as a disposal burden, the researchers used them as a low-cost carbon precursor for an adsorbent that can be separated from water magnetically.</p>
<p>Hexavalent chromium is associated mainly with industrial activities and can enter water through wastewater from metal processing, mining, smelting, electroplating and related operations. Unlike many organic pollutants, heavy metals do not biodegrade and can persist in water, sediments and soils for long periods. Cr(VI) is particularly concerning because of its mobility and toxicity; prolonged or substantial exposure can contribute to inflammation, cancer and severe biological damage. Adsorption is widely investigated as a treatment strategy because it can be efficient and comparatively simple: contaminants attach to the surface of a solid material and are then removed with it. Biochar, a carbon-rich product made from biomass, is attractive because its feedstocks are renewable and inexpensive. Its performance, however, depends strongly on surface chemistry, pore structure and preparation conditions. The tea-waste study sought to improve those characteristics while also making the material easier to recover after treatment.</p>
<p>The researchers collected a mixture of spent green and black tea leaves after extraction and filtration at a tea-beverage factory in Xinyang, Henan Province, China. The wet material was washed, air-dried for 48 hours and ground into a fine powder. To produce the magnetic biochar, they combined five grams of tea powder with ferric chloride, zinc chloride and a five-percent urea solution in water. Zinc chloride acted as a pore-forming agent, urea supplied nitrogen, and ferric chloride provided iron for magnetization and additional reactive sites. The mixture was treated in a hydrothermal reactor, where biomass is carbonized in hot, pressurized water rather than in the oxygen-limited, higher-temperature conditions commonly associated with pyrolysis. This route is useful for wet biomass because it can reduce the energy needed for extensive pre-drying. The resulting solid was filtered, washed until neutral and dried before testing.</p>
<p>To identify the most effective processing window, the team varied the hydrothermal temperature between 180 and 220 degrees Celsius and the treatment time between four and 18 hours. Response surface methodology, a statistical optimization technique, was used to evaluate how those variables affected surface area and chromium removal. The models were statistically strong, with coefficients of determination of 0.9743 for surface area and 0.9705 for removal efficiency. Temperature had a greater effect than reaction time on both outcomes. The best overall preparation condition was 200 degrees Celsius for four hours, producing the material designated NMTB-200. This result illustrates why processing conditions matter for biochar: raising the temperature can open pores and release volatile components, but excessive heating can also damage or collapse parts of the carbon structure. At 220 degrees Celsius, the material’s performance declined rather than continuing to improve.</p>
<p>Microscopic and spectroscopic tests showed how the chemical treatment altered the tea-derived carbon. Untreated tea biochar had a relatively dense and smooth surface, whereas nitrogen-modified and nitrogen-iron-modified samples developed rougher, more visibly porous structures. The specific surface area of NMTB-200 reached 25.177 square meters per gram, compared with 7.185 square meters per gram for the pristine tea biochar. X-ray diffraction identified iron oxide phases, including magnetite, Fe3O4, and hematite, in the modified material. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy detected carbon-nitrogen and iron-oxygen groups, while X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirmed nitrogen and iron on the surface. NMTB contained 6.33 atomic percent nitrogen and 3.4 atomic percent iron in the reported surface analysis. Magnetic measurements showed that saturation magnetization increased with preparation temperature, reaching 5.95 electromagnetic units per gram for NMTB-220. Although NMTB-200 was not the most strongly magnetic sample, its balance of porosity and surface chemistry produced the best chromium uptake.</p>
<p>In controlled adsorption tests, the material’s performance depended on dosage, chromium concentration, contact time and pH. At a dose of 0.1 gram in 50 milliliters of a 50-milligram-per-liter Cr(VI) solution, NMTB-200 achieved 96.90 percent removal. Increasing the amount of biochar beyond the optimum raised the total number of available sites but reduced the adsorption capacity calculated per gram, partly because particles became less effectively dispersed and individual sites were not used as efficiently. As the starting chromium concentration increased, the amount captured per gram rose because more chromium was available to occupy active sites, but the percentage removed fell as those sites approached saturation. Uptake increased rapidly during the early stages of contact and began to level off after roughly six hours. The material performed best under strongly acidic conditions, with its capacity decreasing as pH rose from two to seven. At low pH, protonated surface groups carry positive charge and attract negatively charged chromate species such as HCrO4− and Cr2O7²−.</p>
<p>Equilibrium and rate analyses pointed to a chemically active surface rather than simple physical trapping. The Langmuir model described the data better than the Freundlich model, suggesting that adsorption was dominated by a relatively uniform layer of chromium-bearing species on available sites. The pseudo-second-order model provided the better kinetic fit, although the researchers noted that such a fit alone cannot conclusively prove chemisorption. Additional evidence came from spectroscopy, surface-charge measurements, chromium speciation and computational modeling. After treatment, the biochar surface contained both Cr(VI) and Cr(III), but Cr(III) was the dominant form detected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. In the NMTB-200 experiment, the concentration of Cr(VI) in solution fell from 50 to 5.04 milligrams per liter, while approximately 7.72 milligrams per liter of Cr(III) remained in solution and the rest of the removed chromium was associated with the solid phase. These results indicate that the material does more than attract chromium: it helps reduce the more hazardous hexavalent form to trivalent chromium and then immobilizes the product.</p>
<p>The proposed mechanism unfolds in three connected stages. First, under acidic conditions, positively charged sites on the protonated biochar draw anionic Cr(VI) species toward the surface through electrostatic attraction. Next, electron transfer at iron-, nitrogen- and oxygen-containing sites reduces part of the Cr(VI) to Cr(III). Finally, the reduced chromium forms surface complexes with functional groups in the carbon matrix, including sites associated with nitrogen and iron-oxygen bonds. Density functional theory calculations supported this interpretation: the calculated adsorption energy for chromium at iron and nitrogen sites in NMTB was −3.409 electron volts, compared with −3.201 electron volts for corresponding sites in unmodified tea biochar. The stronger interaction and more pronounced charge transfer predicted for the modified material help explain why it performed well despite having a moderate surface area compared with some engineered adsorbents. In practical terms, the iron particles also offer a route to recover the spent material from water using a magnetic field.</p>
<p>Repeated-use tests provided an early indication of the material’s durability. NMTB-200 was regenerated with sodium hydroxide and reused five times; removal efficiency declined from 99.95 percent in the first cycle to 84.49 percent after the fifth. Iron release remained low, with dissolved iron concentrations below 1.32 milligrams per gram across the cycles, suggesting that much of the iron was retained within or strongly attached to the carbon structure. The researchers also tested a farmland surface-water sample containing 0.0454 milligrams per liter of Cr(VI). After 24 hours, the concentration fell to 0.0016 milligrams per liter, corresponding to 96.55 percent removal. The findings remain laboratory and small-scale demonstrations rather than proof of immediate treatment-plant readiness. Future work will need to assess higher chromium loads, competing ions, larger flow systems, regeneration chemistry, residual zinc and long-term stability. Even so, the one-step process demonstrates a compelling circular-economy concept: a wet, abundant beverage waste can be converted into a recoverable adsorbent that both captures Cr(VI) and promotes its chemical transformation into a less toxic form.</p>
<p>An important scientific feature of the work is that chromium removal was evaluated as both a separation and a chemical-transformation problem. Measuring total chromium alone could make adsorption appear successful even if the contaminant remained in a mobile or hazardous form. By combining solution measurements with surface-sensitive spectroscopy and chromium speciation, the study could distinguish chromium retained on the biochar from chromium that remained dissolved after reduction. That distinction is especially relevant for assessing treatment safety, because a material that transfers contaminants between phases without stabilizing them would provide limited environmental benefit.</p>
<p>The optimization results also illustrate a broader challenge in designing biomass-derived adsorbents. A preparation condition that increases magnetic content or produces more severe carbonization is not necessarily the one that delivers the best overall treatment. Adsorption performance reflects a balance among accessible pores, surface functional groups, iron-containing phases, charge behavior and the stability of those features in water. The researchers’ combined use of response-surface modeling and material characterization therefore connects manufacturing variables with chemical function rather than treating the biochar as an interchangeable carbon powder. Before such a material could be considered for continuous treatment, further testing would be needed in waters containing competing ions and fluctuating acidity, as well as studies of spent-adsorbent handling. The retained chromium and any dissolved iron or other residual process chemicals would need to be managed alongside the treated water itself.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Tea waste-derived magnetic biochar for hexavalent chromium removal from water</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> One-step synthesis of magnetic tea waste biochar for efficient hexavalent chromium adsorption: process optimization, characterization, and adsorption mechanism</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Guo, S., Wang, P., Zhu, Y., Zhou, Y., Li, M., Lin, X., Xu, P., &amp; Sun, M. (2026). One-step synthesis of magnetic tea waste biochar for efficient hexavalent chromium adsorption: process optimization, characterization, and adsorption mechanism. <em>Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, 30</em>(5), Article 63. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44442-026-00114-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44442-026-00114-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44442-026-00114-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44442-026-00114-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> tea waste, magnetic biochar, hexavalent chromium, water treatment, hydrothermal carbonization, adsorption, nitrogen doping, iron oxide, circular economy, One-step, synthesis, magnetic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">184352</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
