<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hydrochar &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/hydrochar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 23:40:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Water-Saving Irrigation and Hydrochar Reshape Carbon Storage in Paddy Soil Clumps</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/water-saving-irrigation-and-hydrochar-reshape-carbon-storage-in-paddy-soil-clumps/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 23:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregate stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycling in flooded rice paddies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combined irrigation and organic amendments in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlled irrigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlled irrigation in rice cultivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of irrigation regime on soil organic matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrochar soil amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal carbonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of hydrochar on soil microbial communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic carbon sequestration in paddy soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paddy soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice straw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil aggregate structure and carbon storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil aggregates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil physics and organic carbon retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil pore architecture and carbon dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable rice farming methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water-saving irrigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water-saving irrigation practices]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=211290</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A controlled experiment shows that switching flooded rice paddies to water-saving irrigation and amending soil with straw-derived hydrochar shifts the size distribution of soil aggregates and locks more organic carbon into large, stable clumps.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath every flooded rice paddy lies an architecture most people never think about: a three-dimensional labyrinth of soil crumbs, ranging from grit-like microaggregates to chunky clumps visible to the naked eye. How those crumbs are sized, how tightly they hold together, and how much organic carbon they trap inside their pores may sound like arcane soil physics, but it sits at the heart of two of agriculture&#8217;s biggest challenges: keeping water in the fields where rice is grown and keeping carbon out of the atmosphere. A new study published in Plant and Soil by Kechun Wang of Northwest A&amp;F University and Hohai University, together with colleagues at Ghent University and collaborators in China, shows that two management choices — switching from continuous flooding to controlled irrigation, and amending soil with a charcoal-like material called hydrochar — can measurably reorganize this hidden architecture and shift where organic carbon accumulates within it.</p>
<p>The team&#8217;s starting point was a gap in the literature. The link between soil aggregates and soil organic carbon cycling has been documented extensively, yet the combined effects of irrigation regime and exogenous organic carbon additions on aggregate distribution, aggregate-bound carbon and microbial communities in paddy soils remained poorly understood. Paddy soils are an unusual case: they spend much of the growing season saturated, which changes everything from oxygen availability to how particles stick together. As water-saving irrigation schemes spread across rice-growing regions to conserve scarce freshwater, researchers have worried about what drier, more fluctuating moisture conditions do to the physical structures that protect carbon in these soils. The new experiment was designed to answer that question directly.</p>
<p>Methodologically, the study was deliberately gentle with its samples. Rather than subjecting soil to aggressive dry sieving, which can shatter natural aggregates and distort the size distribution, the researchers used an optimal-moisture sieving method, working the soil at a moisture content chosen to preserve aggregate integrity. Soil was separated into size classes, from large aggregates larger than 2 millimeters down to fine fractions smaller than 0.25 millimeters. The treatments compared flooding irrigation with controlled irrigation, and each water regime was crossed with additions of rice straw or with hydrochar produced from that same straw by hydrothermal carbonization — a process that converts wet biomass into a carbon-rich, chemically altered solid using heat and pressure in water.</p>
<p>The first striking result is how lopsided paddy soil architecture turned out to be. Across the treatments, aggregates larger than 2 millimeters dominated the soil mass, accounting for between 67 and 80 percent of the total, while the finest fraction below 0.25 millimeters was the least abundant class at just 7 to 16 percent. That imbalance matters more than it might seem. When scientists calculate how much organic carbon sits in the soil as a whole, the bulk of the number comes from whatever size class holds most of the mass — in this case, the big aggregates — even if smaller fractions are individually richer in carbon per gram. The study confirmed exactly this pattern: the fine fractions were enriched in organic carbon and microbial attributes, yet the larger-than-2-millimeter class made the largest numerical contribution to calculated bulk soil organic carbon simply because of its overwhelming mass proportion.</p>
<p>Water management left a clear fingerprint on this architecture. Compared with continuous flooding, controlled irrigation increased the proportion of large aggregates greater than 2 millimeters and improved aggregate-related structural indices, as reflected in higher values of mean weight diameter and geometric mean diameter — two standard measures that essentially summarize whether a soil is dominated by sturdy, well-formed crumbs or by loose, easily eroded fragments. For a water-saving technique, that is a reassuring outcome. It suggests that the drying and re-wetting cycles inherent to controlled irrigation do not necessarily degrade paddy soil structure; instead, under the conditions of this experiment, they appear to have nudged the soil toward a coarser, better-aggregated state.</p>
<p>Adding exogenous organic carbon raised the amount of organic carbon associated with aggregates in both water regimes, but the two amendments behaved in intriguingly different ways. Rice straw proved the stronger stimulator of microbial biomass, consistent with its role as a fresh, easily decomposable food source for soil organisms. Hydrochar, by contrast, produced a greater increase in the proportion of large aggregates and in the organic carbon concentration within that greater-than-2-millimeter class. In other words, straw fed the microbes, while hydrochar built the structure — and locked more carbon into the biggest, mass-dominant crumbs. The authors conclude that hydrochar amendment under controlled irrigation improved aggregate-related structural characteristics and increased aggregate-associated organic carbon mainly by boosting both the mass share and the carbon concentration of the large-aggregate fraction.</p>
<p>The interaction between the two levers was not simply additive. The study found that controlled irrigation and hydrochar amendment influenced aggregate distribution and aggregate-associated organic carbon independently and, for some aggregate-size responses, interactively. This nuance carries practical weight: it means farmers and researchers cannot assume that the effect of a soil amendment is the same under a flooded field as under a water-saving schedule. The moisture regime sets a context that shapes how organic additions translate into physical structure and carbon stabilization, which is precisely the kind of information needed to design management packages rather than isolated interventions.</p>
<p>Why should carbon cling to large aggregates so effectively when hydrochar enters the picture? The mechanistic story, as the authors and the surrounding literature frame it, involves the way particulate organic materials act as binding agents. Fresh plant residues serve as nuclei around which mineral particles and microbial products accumulate, forming larger and more stable aggregates. Hydrochar, being more chemically recalcitrant than raw straw, persists longer and may act as a durable skeletal component within these crumbs, while its own carbon rides along inside the aggregate structure. Meanwhile, the enrichment of organic carbon and microbial attributes in the fine fractions reflects the reality that microaggregates offer protected microhabitats where decomposers and their substrates are held in close, moisture-buffered contact. Both ends of the size spectrum do important work — they just do it in different currencies.</p>
<p>For rice systems, which cover vast areas of Asia and store substantial carbon in their periodically waterlogged soils, the findings arrive at a moment when water scarcity is pushing irrigation reform and carbon accounting is tightening around agriculture. Controlled irrigation is already valued for cutting water use and, according to related work by overlapping research groups, for mitigating methane emissions from paddies. This study adds a structural dimension to its credentials: the practice did not sacrifice, and in fact improved, the aggregation metrics that underpin soil physical health. Pairing it with hydrochar made from the very straw that rice harvests generate offers a circular route — crop residue is converted off-field and returned as a stable carbon amendment that reinforces soil structure rather than decomposing rapidly and releasing its carbon back to the air.</p>
<p>Cautions remain, as they always do with short-term experiments. The aggregates and microbial responses reported here were measured under experimental conditions, and longer-term field studies will be needed to confirm that hydrochar-driven gains in large-aggregate carbon persist across seasons and soil types, and that microbial stimulation by straw does not simply accelerate carbon loss elsewhere in the system. The researchers also note that datasets from the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, inviting replication. Still, the central message is crisp and actionable: the amount of carbon a paddy soil can bank depends not just on what you add to it, but on how wet you keep it — and the best results come when the two are tuned together.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of controlled irrigation and hydrochar amendment on soil aggregate-size distribution and aggregate-associated organic carbon in paddy soils</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Controlled irrigation and hydrocchar amendment alter aggregate-size distribution and aggregate-associated organic carbon in paddy soils</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Controlled irrigation and hydrocchar amendment alter aggregate-size distribution and aggregate-associated organic carbon in paddy soils. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09144-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09144-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09144-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09144-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> paddy soil, soil aggregates, hydrochar, controlled irrigation, soil organic carbon, rice straw, microbial biomass, aggregate stability, carbon sequestration, water-saving irrigation, soil structure, hydrothermal carbonization</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">211290</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sewage Sludge Treatment May Transform, Not Destroy, Microplastics in Wastewater</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/sewage-sludge-treatment-may-transform-not-destroy-microplastics-in-wastewater/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 19:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circular economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of hydrothermal processes on microplastic pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of microplastics in wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fate of PET and polystyrene microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrochar production from sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal carbonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal carbonization wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastic pollution in water treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastic pollution mitigation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microplastic transformation in sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics in urban wastewater management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics migration during sludge processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics removal challenges in biosolids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymer degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polystyrene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sewage sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater microplastics contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=197952</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research shows hydrothermal carbonization transforms rather than eliminates PET and polystyrene microplastics in sewage sludge, transferring substantial organic load into process water.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hydrothermal carbonization has been hailed as one of the most promising ways to deal with the mountains of sewage sludge that modern cities produce every day, a process that uses hot, pressurized water to convert wet organic waste into a carbon-rich solid called hydrochar without the need for energy-hungry drying. But a nagging question has lingered beneath the enthusiasm: what actually happens to the microplastics that concentrate in sludge during wastewater treatment? A new study from researchers at AGH University of Krakow in Poland, published in Energy Reports, offers one of the most detailed answers yet, and its conclusions are more sobering than the optimistic headlines suggest. Under the very conditions used to process sewage sludge, the two dominant microplastic pollutants in biosolids are not eliminated. They are transformed, and much of their material migrates into the process water, where it could pose new treatment challenges.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Zuzanna Prus-Frączek and including senior authors Katarzyna Styszko and Małgorzata Wilk, focused on polyethylene terephthalate, or PET, the polymer of water bottles and food packaging, and polystyrene, or PS, the aromatic plastic found in insulation, packaging foam, and countless disposable items. Both are among the most common polymers recovered from treated sludge, which can harbor hundreds to thousands of microplastic particles per kilogram of dry matter. Because European Union policy increasingly promotes the reuse of sludge as fertilizer and soil amendment on farmland, understanding whether hydrothermal treatment truly breaks these particles down is not an academic detail. It is central to whether plastic pollution quietly rides the circular economy back into the food chain.</p>
<p>Earlier studies had reported that hydrothermal carbonization can slash the number of microplastic particles detectable in sludge by up to 90 percent, with one study showing removal of particles larger than 50 micrometers jumping from about 11 percent to 85 percent as temperatures rose from 170 to 220 degrees Celsius. But a reduction in detectable particles is not the same as destruction. Fragments can shatter below the size limits of analytical instruments, and polymer-derived compounds can dissolve into the surrounding water without ever being mineralized. The Polish team set out to determine which of these fates actually befalls PET and PS, treating the two polymers separately in pure water at 220 degrees Celsius for one, two, and three hours, conditions carefully chosen to mirror real sewage sludge processing while eliminating interference from sludge-derived organic matter.</p>
<p>The results revealed a striking asymmetry between the two plastics. PET, whose backbone contains ester bonds that water can chemically attack, proved far more vulnerable. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that its degradation onset temperature, which stands at roughly 402 degrees Celsius in the raw polymer, plummeted to between 246 and 284 degrees Celsius after treatment. The pyrolytic residue left at 800 degrees Celsius collapsed from 12.7 percent to as little as 1.3 percent, indicating a severely diminished tendency to form stable carbon structures. Infrared and Raman spectroscopy painted a consistent picture: the sharp ester carbonyl band at 1714 inverse centimeters gave way to new dominant components near 1671 to 1677 inverse centimeters, signaling a heterogeneous mix of partially hydrolyzed ester bonds and newly formed oxygen-containing structures. Scanning electron microscopy showed surfaces transformed from smooth and compact into rough, cracked, and cavity-riddled landscapes.</p>
<p>Polystyrene, by contrast, emerged from the reactor remarkably intact. Its hydrophobic aromatic skeleton, held together by carbon-carbon bonds that water cannot easily cleave, resisted the conditions that visibly weakened PET. Treated PS samples retained a single-step thermal degradation profile with maximum decomposition temperatures of around 416 to 417 degrees Celsius, essentially unchanged from the raw material. The principal FTIR and Raman bands, including the characteristic aromatic ring breathing mode near 1001 inverse centimeters, remained within measurement uncertainty of their original positions. Only slight band broadening after three hours hinted at limited local disorder at the surface. The finding aligns with earlier work showing that complete PS decomposition demands 360 degrees Celsius and four hours, conditions far more severe than any sewage sludge reactor would employ.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential discovery came from analyzing the process water itself. When the researchers measured chemical oxygen demand and total organic carbon in the liquid phase, PET proved to be a prodigious polluter. Normalized to the initial polymer mass, PET released approximately 737 to 876 milligrams of COD and 320 to 343 milligrams of TOC per gram of plastic into the water, with absolute concentrations reaching 6145 to 7300 milligrams per liter of COD and around 2700 to 2855 milligrams per liter of TOC. Polystyrene, in comparison, contributed only 35 to 83 milligrams of COD and 99 to 140 milligrams of TOC per gram of polymer. The pH of the PET process water remained stubbornly acidic, between 3.8 and 3.9, consistent with the accumulation of acidic products from ester bond cleavage, while phenolic compounds slowly increased with longer treatment, suggesting the formation of refractory aromatic derivatives that resist further degradation.</p>
<p>These numbers carry a direct message for engineers designing full-scale sludge hydrothermal carbonization plants. Process water from sludge HTC is already heavily loaded with dissolved organics and can contain inhibitory or toxic compounds, and adding a substantial polymer-derived burden, particularly from PET-rich sludge, would amplify the challenge of treating or safely recirculating that water. Previous pilot-scale studies have shown that biological treatment of HTC process water can achieve COD removals of roughly 71 to 75 percent in membrane bioreactors and sequencing batch reactors, but the researchers caution that the added plastic-derived load could strain these systems further. Hydrochar yields added another layer of nuance: the most intensive apparent conversion for both polymers occurred at two hours, with yields for PS dropping to 75.6 percent and PET to 53.6 percent, and the non-monotonic trends hint at competing processes of depolymerization, dissolution, and secondary condensation of soluble intermediates back onto the solid phase.</p>
<p>The environmental implications extend beyond the treatment plant. Hydrochar from PET-containing sludge, with its weakened structure and earlier degradation onset, would likely be more susceptible to further fragmentation, oxidation, and weathering if applied to soils, potentially generating new generations of smaller plastic particles. The dramatic reduction in pyrolytic residue also suggests a diminished capacity for stable carbon sequestration in PET-derived char, undermining one of the climate arguments for hydrochar use in agriculture. Polystyrene-derived material, meanwhile, may remain embedded within or incorporated into the carbonized matrix despite surface alteration, retaining its aromatic identity. In neither case does the plastic vanish. As the authors put it, HTC should be understood primarily as a polymer-transformation and redistribution process, shifting material between the solid, liquid, and gas phases rather than eliminating it from the system.</p>
<p>The study does have limits that the team acknowledges candidly. The experiments used pristine, manually fragmented waste plastics in distilled water at a single temperature, rather than environmentally aged particles in a real sludge matrix, and the analyses could not identify specific molecular transformation products, distinguish hydrolysis from oxidation, or assess nanoplastic formation because samples were ground before imaging. Future work, the researchers argue, should incorporate real sewage sludge, replicate experiments across broader operating windows, and deploy gas and liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry to identify individual compounds, alongside leaching and ecotoxicity tests to evaluate the fate of released organics in soils. For now, the message for the water sector is clear and somewhat uncomfortable: hydrothermal carbonization remains a valuable technology for valorizing wet sludge, but claims of microplastic removal must be read as claims of microplastic transformation, and any credible plant design must treat the process water as a first-class waste stream, not an afterthought.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Hydrothermal carbonization of PET and polystyrene microplastics under sewage sludge treatment conditions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Hydrothermal carbonization of PET and PS microplastics under conditions relevant to sewage sludge treatment</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Prus-Frączek, Z., Kalemba-Rec, I., Magdziarz, A., Dróżdż, A., Chwiej, J., Styszko, K., &amp; Wilk, M. (2026). Hydrothermal carbonization of PET and PS microplastics under conditions relevant to sewage sludge treatment. <em>Energy Reports, 16</em>, Article 109697. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109697" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109697</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109697" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109697</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> microplastics, hydrothermal carbonization, sewage sludge, PET, polystyrene, hydrochar, process water, wastewater treatment, COD, TOC, polymer degradation, circular economy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">197952</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
