<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>host-pathogen interaction in TB &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/host-pathogen-interaction-in-tb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Inflammatory Biomarkers Distinguish Asymptomatic From Symptomatic Tuberculosis</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/inflammatory-biomarkers-distinguish-asymptomatic-from-symptomatic-tuberculosis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 11:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asymptomatic TB detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cytokine signatures in TB diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distinguishing asymptomatic from symptomatic tuberculosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[host-pathogen interaction in TB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immune biomarkers for TB disease stages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immune pathway analysis in TB diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immune response profiling in tuberculosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inflammatory immune markers in TB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistical modeling of TB biomarkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systemic immune shifts in latent TB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TB immunological trajectory analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tuberculosis biomarkers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/inflammatory-biomarkers-distinguish-asymptomatic-from-symptomatic-tuberculosis/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new viral science news report from Nature Communications highlights how the immune system’s earliest fingerprints may distinguish people who carry tuberculosis without symptoms from those who develop overt disease. The study, led by Awany and colleagues, asks a question that has long shaped TB diagnostics: which inflammatory signals rise early, which appear only after [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new viral science news report from Nature Communications highlights how the immune system’s earliest fingerprints may distinguish people who carry tuberculosis without symptoms from those who develop overt disease. The study, led by Awany and colleagues, asks a question that has long shaped TB diagnostics: which inflammatory signals rise early, which appear only after illness begins, and which may remain undetected by standard clinical approaches.</p>
<p>Researchers analyzed inflammatory biomarkers across groups spanning asymptomatic infection and symptomatic tuberculosis. By profiling multiple immune-associated markers rather than relying on a single readout, the team aimed to map a more informative immunological trajectory—one that could improve interpretation of TB risk in real-world settings.</p>
<p>The work emphasizes that “asymptomatic” does not mean “immunologically silent.” Even without classic symptoms, infected individuals can show detectable systemic shifts, including altered cytokine-linked patterns. The researchers report that these signatures partially overlap with those seen in active disease, yet also diverge in ways consistent with different stages of host–pathogen interaction.</p>
<p>Technically, the approach integrates statistical modeling to compare biomarker distributions between clinical categories and to identify markers that best separate asymptomatic from symptomatic states. This includes evaluating effect sizes and consistency across immune pathways tied to inflammation and leukocyte signaling.</p>
<p>A central implication is clinical stratification: inflammatory biomarkers may help categorize TB beyond sputum-based or symptom-based criteria. For screening programs, such stratification could reduce missed cases by flagging individuals whose immune profiles suggest progression risk, even when symptoms are absent.</p>
<p>The findings also suggest potential biological mechanisms. Distinct inflammatory patterns may reflect differences in bacterial burden, lesion dynamics in the lung, and the balance between protective versus damaging immune responses. In symptomatic disease, the biomarker landscape appears skewed toward stronger, more dysregulated inflammation.</p>
<p>If validated in larger cohorts, the study’s biomarker panel could support earlier and more accurate triage—especially in settings where access to confirmatory testing is limited. The authors frame the results as a step toward immune-guided TB diagnostics and improved monitoring of disease states.</p>
<p>Ultimately, the research reframes TB as a spectrum of immunological states rather than a binary label. By refining the inflammatory signatures associated with asymptomatic versus symptomatic infection, the study offers a roadmap for next-generation, pathway-aware diagnostic strategies.</p>
<p>If your goal is translational impact, this work underscores why multi-marker immune profiling is gaining traction. It may turn inflammatory noise into actionable signal—helping clinicians identify who needs urgent evaluation, and who can be monitored more safely.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Tuberculosis immune biomarkers (asymptomatic vs symptomatic)</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Inflammatory biomarkers of asymptomatic and symptomatic tuberculosis.</p>
<p><strong>Article References</strong>: Awany, D., Ariefdien, D.T., Mendelsohn, S.C. <i>et al.</i> Inflammatory biomarkers of asymptomatic and symptomatic tuberculosis. <i>Nat Commun</i> (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-75909-6</p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI</strong>: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-75909-6</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: tuberculosis; inflammatory biomarkers; asymptomatic infection; symptomatic TB; cytokine profiles; immune stratification</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">173810</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unraveling the Role of DNASE1L2 Intron Retention in Tuberculosis Progression</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/unraveling-the-role-of-dnase1l2-intron-retention-in-tuberculosis-progression/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[active TB disease prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative RNA splicing in TB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNASE1L2 intron retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynamic biomarkers for tuberculosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[host-pathogen interaction in TB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intron retention in infectious diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[latent tuberculosis infection monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mycobacterium tuberculosis gene expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-transcriptional regulation in tuberculosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA splicing as diagnostic tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TB disease transmission control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuberculosis progression biomarkers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/unraveling-the-role-of-dnase1l2-intron-retention-in-tuberculosis-progression/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tuberculosis (TB) continues to pose a formidable challenge to global health, infecting roughly a quarter of the world&#8217;s population with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Despite the latent nature of most infections, individuals harboring latent TB infection (LTBI) face the ever-present risk of developing active TB, which escalates the potential for disease transmission within communities. This evolving spectrum [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tuberculosis (TB) continues to pose a formidable challenge to global health, infecting roughly a quarter of the world&#8217;s population with <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em>. Despite the latent nature of most infections, individuals harboring latent TB infection (LTBI) face the ever-present risk of developing active TB, which escalates the potential for disease transmission within communities. This evolving spectrum from latent carriage to active disease underscores the urgency for diagnostic tools that do more than merely identify infection; these tools must predict progression to enable timely intervention and curb the spread of TB. However, current biomarkers effectively differentiate latent infection from active disease but fall short in dynamically monitoring disease progression—highlighting a critical gap in TB control strategies.</p>
<p>Emerging research has spotlighted alternative RNA splicing as a highly responsive mechanism attuned to cellular microenvironmental changes, positioning it as a promising biomarker for disease development. Among alternative splicing modalities, intron retention (IR) is particularly pervasive, influencing the expression of nearly 80% of protein-coding genes. IR represents a finely tuned post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism, capable of altering transcriptomes and proteomes in response to physiological and pathological cues. This biological process plays substantial roles across disease contexts, including cancer progression and aging; yet its function within the complex interplay of TB pathogenesis remained unexplored until recently.</p>
<p>In an innovative study published in the <em>Chinese Medical Journal</em>, researchers systematically charted the molecular landscape of IR-driven splicing reprogramming throughout TB progression. Their work reveals the dynamic functional significance of IR events, focusing on the intron retention of the <em>DNASE1L2</em> gene (referred to as <em>DNASE1L2</em>-IR) as a novel biomarker and mechanistic player. This gene encodes a deoxyribonuclease involved in nucleic acid degradation, an essential step in modulating host innate immune responses to pathogen DNA. Through their analysis, the authors unveiled the dual role of <em>DNASE1L2</em>-IR in controlling TB progression by balancing microbial DNA clearance and inflammation regulation.</p>
<p>The investigation harnessed high-throughput sequencing data from an extensive cohort of 1,729 human clinical samples, encompassing healthy controls, individuals with LTBI, and patients diagnosed with active TB. This comprehensive analysis illuminated genome-wide patterns of intron splicing reprogramming, underscoring the dynamic shifting of IR events as infection progresses. Among these, four IR events emerged as significantly correlated with latent infection and disease advancement, with the <em>DNASE1L2</em> intron retention event demonstrating the most prominent and characteristic rise-and-fall fluctuation aligned with disease stages.</p>
<p>Intriguingly, <em>DNASE1L2</em>-IR levels were elevated in individuals with LTBI compared to healthy controls, diminished markedly in patients experiencing active TB, and were even higher in “progressors” —those LTBI cases transitioning to active disease— versus “non-progressors.” This biphasic pattern was consistently corroborated in multiple antigen-stimulated cell models mimicking <em>M. tuberculosis</em> infection, reflecting a robust association with host immune status transitions under infectious stress. This dynamic indicates that <em>DNASE1L2</em>-IR not only marks infection status but actively participates in modulating immunological responses.</p>
<p>Delving deeper, molecular and cellular studies revealed that <em>DNASE1L2</em>-IR gives rise to two functionally distinct transcript isoforms: a long isoform (<em>DNASE1L2-L</em>) and a short isoform (<em>DNASE1L2-S</em>). Upon stimulation with <em>M. tuberculosis</em>, the long isoform predominantly localizes to the cytoplasm, positioning it advantageously for accessing and degrading microbial DNA. Conversely, the short isoform remains tethered to the cell membrane, likely limiting its interaction with intracellular substrates. Functional assays demonstrated that <em>DNASE1L2-L</em> boasts substantially higher DNase enzymatic activity, efficiently degrading <em>M. tuberculosis</em> genomic DNA as well as supercoiled plasmid DNA. This heightened catalytic function positions the long isoform as a critical modulator of host-pathogen interaction dynamics.</p>
<p>Crucially, cellular experiments showed that overexpression of <em>DNASE1L2-L</em> curtailed the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β, which are widely recognized as mediators driving immunopathology in TB. In contrast, knockout of <em>DNASE1L2</em> amplified inflammatory responses, underscoring the protective, inflammation-regulating function of this IR event. This mechanistic insight bridges molecular splicing changes with functional immunological outcomes, marking <em>DNASE1L2</em>-IR as a fine-tuner of host inflammation and bacterial clearance.</p>
<p>Collectively, these findings frame <em>DNASE1L2</em>-IR upregulation early in TB progression as a host defense strategy aimed at enhancing the production of the catalytically potent <em>DNASE1L2-L</em> isoform. This isoform facilitates the degradation of persistent mycobacterial DNA, thereby attenuating excessive inflammatory damage while promoting pathogen clearance. Conversely, downregulation of <em>DNASE1L2</em>-IR in certain individuals predisposes them to diminished DNase activity, allowing the pathogen to persist and amplify disease severity by inciting uncontrolled inflammation.</p>
<p>This seminal study is the first to link intron retention—a post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism—with dynamic biomarkers for monitoring TB progression. It elucidates a nuanced splicing-mediated host-pathogen crosstalk, revealing how <em>M. tuberculosis</em> may alter host RNA splicing patterns to its advantage, influencing disease outcomes. These insights pave the way for developing innovative RNA splicing-based diagnostic tools capable of predicting disease progression with temporal precision, offering new avenues for early intervention.</p>
<p>Moreover, the therapeutic implications are profound. By harnessing or modulating <em>DNASE1L2</em> splicing events, future treatments may augment host defense mechanisms to limit disease advancement or attenuate damaging inflammation. The identification of this RNA splicing signature opens an untapped frontier in TB research, challenging conventional paradigms and heralding a new era of precision medicine in combating one of humanity’s oldest and deadliest infectious diseases.</p>
<p>Led by Professor Ying Binwu and colleagues at West China Hospital of Sichuan University, this work exemplifies cutting-edge molecular medicine integrating genomics, immunology, and infectious disease biology. Professor Ying’s expertise in molecular diagnostics and his team’s rigorous multi-model approach underpin the robustness and translational potential of these discoveries. The profound societal benefits of such research underscore the urgent need to integrate molecular splicing biomarkers into global TB control efforts.</p>
<p>As TB continues to claim millions of lives annually, innovative strategies that combine early detection, dynamic monitoring, and targeted molecular interventions offer renewed hope. The unveiling of <em>DNASE1L2</em> intron retention dynamics not only advances scientific understanding but also charts a compelling course toward conquering TB through molecular precision, potentially reshaping public health landscapes worldwide.</p>
<hr />
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Human tissue samples</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Elucidating the functional dynamics of DNASE1L2 intron retention in tuberculosis progression</p>
<p><strong>News Publication Date</strong>: 5-Mar-2026</p>
<p><strong>Web References</strong>: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000003974">DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003974</a></p>
<p><strong>References</strong>:<br />
DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003974</p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: Bingwu Ying, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, China</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: Tuberculosis, <em>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</em>, intron retention, RNA splicing, DNASE1L2, biomarker, disease progression, immune regulation, molecular diagnostics, inflammation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">147343</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
