<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>homogenization &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/homogenization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 05:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>China&#8217;s climate record gets a 60-year cleanup as scientists scrub hidden biases from the data</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/chinas-climate-record-gets-a-60-year-cleanup-as-scientists-scrub-hidden-biases-from-the-data/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell Cooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 05:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Athmospheric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China climate dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate bias correction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change detection in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate data homogenization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate dataset]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate research transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data quality in climate science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ERA5-Land]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical climate analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homogenization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homogenized climate datasets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term climate records]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorological station data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meteorological stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peking University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reanalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reanalysis climate data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relative humidity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science China Earth Sciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar radiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban and environmental climate studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urbanization]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=243399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Peking University team has released HCD01, a homogenized daily gridded climate dataset for China covering 1961 to 2022, after correcting non-climatic biases in station observations and merging them with ERA5-Land reanalysis.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you measure the climate of a country when the rulers keep changing? That deceptively simple question sits at the heart of one of the most persistent problems in climate science, and it is the problem a research team led by Professor Kaicun Wang of the College of Urban and Environmental Sciences at Peking University has now tackled head-on for China. In a paper published in Science China Earth Sciences, the team describes the construction of a Homogenized Gridded Climate Dataset for China, known as HCD01, and has simultaneously released it publicly through the National Tibetan Plateau Data Center. The dataset delivers daily climate information at a spatial resolution of 0.1 degrees, covering the period from 1961 to 2022, and it is built from homogenized raw observations at roughly 2,400 national meteorological stations combined with reanalysis data. For anyone studying how China&#8217;s climate has shifted over more than six decades, this is the most carefully cleaned foundation yet.</p>
<p>The reason such an effort is needed lies in the nature of the observing network itself. Surface meteorological stations are the workhorses of climate-change detection, attribution, and impact studies, and they also serve as the yardsticks against which satellite remote-sensing retrievals and climate model simulations are evaluated. But these stations are not pristine instruments floating above history. Observing instruments are continuously upgraded and replaced, and different instruments carry different biases. When a thermometer design changes or a humidity sensor is swapped for a newer model, the recorded values can shift for reasons that have nothing to do with the atmosphere. These artificial changes, known as inhomogeneities, contaminate the very records scientists rely on to detect long-term climate signals.</p>
<p>In principle, observational data are expected to represent large-scale climate-change signals on the order of 100 kilometers or more. Yet changes in the local environment surrounding a station, most notably urbanization, can be superimposed on those large-scale signals. To accurately detect and attribute climate change, the effects of non-climatic factors and local environmental changes must be removed as much as possible. Some of these effects are comparatively easy to handle. Abrupt changes caused by station relocations and instrument replacements tend to be large and can usually be detected and corrected through conventional homogenization techniques. The harder problem is the slow one: changes in the observing environment around a station are often gradual, and each individual change has only a small effect on the observations, making it extremely difficult to identify and correct. Over decades, however, these small effects accumulate into systematic biases that can significantly distort estimates of climate-change trends and even undermine the reliability of detection and attribution studies.</p>
<p>Traditional homogenization methods generally rely on comparisons with neighboring stations. A set of reference stations with similar elevation and reliable data quality is selected around a target station, and possible inhomogeneities are identified by comparing their time series. The logic is sound when the neighbors are clean. But when many stations in a region are simultaneously affected by instrument sensitivity drift, instrument replacement, urbanization, and other factors, the reference stations themselves may contain inhomogeneities. In that case, the method can miss the very signals it is designed to find, and its ability to detect both gradual and abrupt inhomogeneities becomes limited. This is precisely the situation across much of China, where the national station network has undergone sweeping technological and environmental change over the past sixty years.</p>
<p>To break this deadlock, Wang&#8217;s team spent more than a decade developing a homogenization method based on same-station comparison. Instead of leaning on neighboring stations that may share the same hidden biases, the approach overcomes key difficulties in detecting and correcting gradual inhomogeneities, and it enables the detection and correction of both gradual and abrupt inhomogeneities in China&#8217;s land-surface climate observations. The variables it covers are the essential ones for climate monitoring: surface solar radiation, wind speed, relative humidity, air temperature, ground temperature, and precipitation. The method provides the technical backbone for building high-quality climate datasets for China, and HCD01 is the first major product of that backbone.</p>
<p>The corrections the team uncovered are striking, and they change how several well-known features of China&#8217;s climate record should be interpreted. Before 1990, strict calibration instruments and procedures were lacking, and gradual inhomogeneity caused by instrument sensitivity drift crept into China&#8217;s surface solar radiation observations. The consequence is significant: the widely reported decreasing trend in surface solar radiation during 1960 to 1990 was seriously overestimated. Then, during 1990 to 1993, instrument updates caused a sudden increase in the observations, an artificial step that had nothing to do with the sun or the clouds. In other words, part of the famous global dimming and brightening story as recorded over China was an artifact of the instruments rather than the atmosphere.</p>
<p>The twenty-first century brought a different kind of discontinuity. China&#8217;s meteorological observations began shifting from manual to automatic observation, and the greatest impact fell on relative humidity. Under conditions of low near-surface wind speed, the dry- and wet-bulb thermometers used in manual observations tended to overestimate relative humidity, whereas the capacitive sensors used in automatic observations did not have this problem. The transition between the two methods therefore produced a false decreasing trend in relative humidity observations in the twenty-first century, a trend that reflects changing hardware rather than a drying atmosphere. Correcting this bias matters enormously, because relative humidity feeds directly into calculations of evaporation, heat stress, and the behavior of the hydrological cycle.</p>
<p>Urbanization left its own fingerprints on the record. The growth of cities around meteorological stations amplified the observed warming trend of daily minimum temperature, since urban surfaces store and release heat differently than the rural landscapes that once surrounded the stations. Urbanization also increased surface roughness, which reduced near-surface wind speed as measured at those sites. Meanwhile, relocations of meteorological stations from urban to rural areas caused abrupt increases in observed wind speed, the opposite artifact. The team notes that although the decline in station-observed near-surface wind speed does not represent large-scale change, it does reflect real changes in near-surface wind speed at the observing sites themselves, and it affects station precipitation observations, since wind influences how effectively rain gauges catch falling precipitation.</p>
<p>Cleaning the station records, however, is only half the battle. Homogenized station observations alone remain insufficient for climate-change research because observing stations are sparse and unevenly distributed across China, and because observation periods differ among stations. That makes direct spatiotemporal analysis at the national scale difficult. To solve this, the team merged the homogenized station observations with ERA5-Land reanalysis data to construct HCD01, providing complete spatial coverage at a daily, 0.1-degree resolution for 1961 through 2022. The results show that HCD01 clearly improves the representation of long-term trends compared with both reanalysis data alone and raw observations, offering a high-quality data basis for studies of regional climate change and its impacts across China.</p>
<p>The study was led by Professor Kaicun Wang, who served as first author and corresponding author. The research team included current graduate students Hongze Cai, Yun Li, Hanmeng Xia, and Changjian Yin from Wang&#8217;s group, along with former graduate students including Professor Chunlue Zhou and Associate Professor Yanyi He, both of Sun Yat-sen University, Young Researcher Zhengtai Zhang of Lanzhou University, and Dr. Runze Zhao of the National Satellite Meteorological Center of the China Meteorological Administration. The work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China and the Science and Technology Program of Guizhou Province. With HCD01 now openly available, researchers studying everything from agricultural water demand to solar energy potential in China have access to a climate record in which the instruments, the cities, and the station moves have been carefully accounted for, leaving the climate signal standing on its own.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Homogenization of Chinese meteorological station records and construction of a gridded climate dataset</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Peking University team releases homogenized gridded climate dataset for China</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Peking University team releases homogenized gridded climate dataset for China. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1141765" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> climate dataset, homogenization, China, meteorological stations, solar radiation, relative humidity, urbanization, ERA5-Land, reanalysis, climate change detection, Peking University, Science China Earth Sciences</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">243399</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Multiscale Model Tames the Twisting Physics of Metallic Wire Mesh</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-multiscale-model-tames-the-twisting-physics-of-metallic-wire-mesh/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katie Riggs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced materials modeling for space applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace deployable antenna materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anisotropic elastoplastic behavior simulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anisotropic elastoplasticity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational modeling of woven wire structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational solid mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contact and friction modeling in woven metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continuum mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deployable mesh antennas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficient simulation techniques for metallic fabrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finite element analysis challenges in mesh structures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finite element method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hill-48 yield criterion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homogenization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact-resistant panel reinforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metallic wire mesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metallic wire mesh deformation modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiscale analysis in aerospace engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiscale homogenization in materials science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiscale modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[representative volume element]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surgical implant material simulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wire contact and friction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=202363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have developed an RVE-based multiscale homogenization framework that reproduces the anisotropic elastoplastic tensile behavior of metallic wire-mesh structures with about 5.36 times faster computation and a sixfold wider validated range than an elastic-only model.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metallic wire mesh is one of those deceptively simple materials that hides a startling amount of complexity beneath its surface. Woven from fine metal wires in warp and weft directions, these fabric-like structures are the reflective hearts of deployable space antennas, the reinforcing layers inside impact-resistant panels, and even the surgical implants used in modern medicine. Yet when engineers try to simulate how a wire mesh stretches, bends, or deforms under load, they quickly collide with a computational wall. Every point where one wire crosses another is a potential site of contact, frictional sliding, and rearrangement, and capturing all of those interactions in a full-scale finite element model can require enormous computing resources. A new study published in the International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences offers a way through that wall, presenting a multiscale homogenization framework that reproduces the global, anisotropic, elastoplastic behavior of metallic wire meshes at a fraction of the usual computational cost.</p>
<p>The research, led by Jeong-Hoon Park and Il-Jun Hwang of Jeonbuk National University, together with Tae-Yong Park of STEP Lab, Hyun-Ung Oh of Korea Aerospace University and STEP Lab, and Jae Hyuk Lim of Kyung Hee University, tackles a problem that has long frustrated aerospace structural analysts. Metallic meshes do not behave like ordinary solid sheets. Because the wires are woven rather than fused, the material&#8217;s stiffness and strength depend strongly on the direction of loading. Pull along the warp direction and the mesh responds one way; pull along the weft and the response can be markedly different. This pronounced anisotropy arises from the interplay of wire stretching, bending, contact at crossover points, frictional sliding between wires, and the gradual rearrangement of the weave as deformation accumulates. Any simulation that ignores these effects risks giving designers a misleading picture of how a deployable antenna reflector will hold its shape in orbit or how a mesh-reinforced structure will absorb an impact.</p>
<p>The team&#8217;s approach centers on the concept of a representative volume element, or RVE, a small but statistically meaningful snapshot of the mesh&#8217;s microstructure that captures the essential geometry and contact behavior of the weave. Rather than modeling every wire in an entire antenna or panel, the researchers built a detailed finite element model of a small RVE and subjected it to controlled tensile loading. From that microscopic simulation, they extracted equivalent stress-strain curves that describe how the mesh as a whole responds to tension. Crucially, they performed this calibration within a moderate strain range, keeping strains below 0.2, a regime in which the mesh&#8217;s deformation remains dominated by reversible elastic response and predictable plastic flow rather than by the chaotic wire sliding and separation that occur at larger deformations.</p>
<p>With those equivalent material parameters in hand, the researchers constructed what is known as a continuum model, a simplified representation of the mesh as if it were a solid sheet of material. But because the mesh is so directionally dependent, a conventional isotropic model would not suffice. Instead, the team turned to the Hill-48 yield criterion, a classical mathematical description of anisotropic plasticity originally developed for sheet metal forming. By fitting the Hill-48 parameters to the RVE-derived stress-strain curves for both the warp and weft directions, they created an anisotropic elastoplastic continuum model capable of reproducing the mesh&#8217;s nonlinear tensile response in any in-plane direction, while treating the material as a homogeneous continuum rather than an assembly of thousands of individual wires.</p>
<p>The real test of any homogenization scheme is whether the simplified model agrees with the detailed one. To find out, the researchers compared the mechanical responses of their full wire-mesh finite element model and their homogenized continuum model under identical tensile loading conditions, applied separately in the warp and weft directions. They imposed an explicit numerical-consistency criterion: the normalized reaction-force error between the two models had to remain within 10 percent. This kind of quantitative benchmark is what separates rigorous multiscale modeling from mere curve fitting, because it tells downstream users exactly how far they can trust the simplified model before its predictions drift beyond an acceptable tolerance.</p>
<p>The results were striking. The anisotropic elastoplastic homogenized model extended the displacement range over which the 10 percent error criterion was satisfied by approximately 6.1 times compared with a simpler equivalent-elastic homogenized model, which assumes the mesh remains purely elastic and therefore cannot capture the progressive yielding and plastic flow that dominates at larger stretches. At the same time, the new model cut the computation time by roughly a factor of 5.36. That combination, a much wider valid range and much faster execution, is exactly what design engineers need when they must iterate through dozens of candidate antenna geometries or optimize a mesh-reinforced structure under tight program schedules. A simulation that takes hours instead of days changes not just the analysis workflow but the entire pace of design exploration.</p>
<p>To demonstrate practical applicability beyond the calibration exercises, the team applied their identified equivalent material parameters to a specimen-level tensile analysis, showing that the homogenized model could be deployed directly on realistic component-scale problems. This step matters because a multiscale framework is only useful if the parameters extracted from a tiny RVE remain meaningful when embedded in a much larger structural simulation. The specimen-level example served as a bridge between the micromechanical calibration and the macroscopic engineering use case, illustrating how the workflow could be adopted by other groups working on mesh-based aerospace hardware.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to frame their contribution honestly. The homogenized formulation is a design-oriented model for the calibrated moderate tensile strain regime, not a replacement for detailed micromechanical contact modeling. Once severe inter-wire sliding, wire separation, contact rearrangement, or post-buckling behavior becomes dominant, the equivalent continuum representation loses its physical grounding, and analysts must return to full micromechanical simulations or experimental testing. That limitation is not a weakness of the method so much as a definition of its operating envelope, and by stating it explicitly alongside the 10 percent error criterion, the researchers have given the engineering community a clear contract: within the calibrated range, the model is fast, accurate, and trustworthy; outside it, users know they are on their own.</p>
<p>The broader implications reach across several industries. For space applications, metallic meshes are the defining component of large deployable reflector antennas, where surface accuracy, thermal stability, and mass all depend on the mesh&#8217;s mechanical behavior, and missions ranging from Earth science CubeSats to commercial Ku- and Ka-band communications satellites rely on such reflectors. Beyond orbit, wire meshes reinforce concrete structures, absorb energy under low-velocity impact, filter fluids in chemical processing, and serve as biomedical implants, each application constrained by the same directional, nonlinear mechanics that this framework now captures efficiently. As simulation-driven design becomes the norm across aerospace and materials engineering, tools that compress computation time while widening the range of reliable prediction will shape what engineers dare to build. This study&#8217;s blend of rigorous micromechanics, classical anisotropic plasticity theory, and transparent error quantification offers a template for how heterogeneous fabric-like materials can be brought into the fast lane of modern computational design, one representative volume element at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> An RVE-based multiscale homogenization framework for predicting the anisotropic elastoplastic tensile response of metallic wire-mesh structures.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> An RVE-Based Homogenization Framework for the Global Anisotropic Elastoplastic Response of Metallic Wire-Mesh Structures</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Park, J.-H., Hwang, I.-J., Park, T.-Y., Oh, H.-U., &amp; Lim, J. H. (2026). An RVE-Based Homogenization Framework for the Global Anisotropic Elastoplastic Response of Metallic Wire-Mesh Structures. <em>International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-026-01290-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-026-01290-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-026-01290-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s42405-026-01290-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> metallic wire mesh, multiscale modeling, homogenization, representative volume element, anisotropic elastoplasticity, Hill-48 yield criterion, finite element method, deployable mesh antennas, computational solid mechanics, aerospace structures, wire contact and friction, continuum mechanics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">202363</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
