<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>herbicide &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/herbicide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 03:40:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Common Herbicide Crosses the Placenta in Rats, Raising Fetal Exposure Concerns</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/common-herbicide-crosses-the-placenta-in-rats-raising-fetal-exposure-concerns/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harold Sullivan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 03:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical accumulation in fetal organs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-species herbicide exposure research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developmental toxicology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental contaminants in pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental health risk of herbicides during pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flavonoids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haloxyfop-R-methyl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haloxyfop-R-methyl herbicide study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hepatotoxicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbicide crossing the placenta in mammals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbicide fetal exposure in rats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbicide safety assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbicide transfer in pregnant animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of herbicide exposure on fetal development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LC-MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narcissin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticide exposure and fetal health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticide residues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placental transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[placental transfer of herbicides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sophoroflavonoside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wistar rats]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=272715</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new rat study shows the grass-selective herbicide haloxyfop-R-methyl accumulates in both maternal and fetal organs during pregnancy and injures the maternal liver, with plant-derived flavonoids offering partial biochemical protection.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A widely used grass-selective herbicide can accumulate in both pregnant mothers and their developing fetuses, according to a new study in Wistar rats that tracked the chemical&#8217;s journey through maternal tissues and across the placenta. The research, published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, examined haloxyfop-R-methyl, an aryloxyphenoxypropionate herbicide prized by farmers for its ability to kill grassy weeds without harming broadleaf crops. The findings suggest that when pregnant animals are exposed to this compound, it does not remain confined to maternal circulation but instead reaches fetal organs, including the liver, lung, brain, and spleen, at concentrations that vary depending on when during gestation the exposure occurs.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Abdurakhmonova Mashkhura Javdatovna of Andijan State Pedagogical Institute in Uzbekistan together with colleagues at several Uzbek institutions and Muhammad Waheed of the University of Okara in Pakistan, designed the experiment around a deceptively simple question: where does the herbicide go once it enters a pregnant body, and what does it do there? To answer it, pregnant Wistar rats received a single oral dose of haloxyfop-R-methyl at one-tenth of the dose lethal to half of exposed animals, a sublethal level intended to model realistic environmental exposure rather than acute poisoning. Crucially, the timing of that dose was varied across three groups, with animals dosed on gestational day 3, gestational day 13, or gestational day 17, spanning the earliest stages of embryonic development through late organogenesis.</p>
<p>On gestational days 20 and 21, near the end of the roughly three-week rat pregnancy, the researchers collected liver, lung, spleen, and brain tissue from both mothers and fetuses and quantified herbicide residues using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, the gold-standard analytical technique for trace contaminant detection. The method&#8217;s performance was rigorous: calibration curves showed strong linearity, with slopes of 93,384.20 and 97,181.37 and uncentered R-squared values of 0.99993 and 0.99978, meaning the instrument&#8217;s signal tracked concentration almost perfectly across the measured range. Control animals showed no detectable herbicide, confirming that the signal in treated animals came from the experimental exposure rather than background contamination.</p>
<p>The residue data revealed a striking pattern. Haloxyfop-R-methyl was present in every maternal and fetal tissue examined, demonstrating that the compound crosses the placenta efficiently and distributes widely through fetal circulation. Concentrations differed among the three exposure-timing groups, with the highest levels appearing in animals dosed latest in pregnancy. In the gestational day 17 group, maternal liver reached 0.619 plus or minus 0.050 micrograms per gram and maternal lung reached 0.529 plus or minus 0.041 micrograms per gram, the highest maternal values recorded. Fetal tissues followed the same trend, with fetal liver peaking at 0.419 plus or minus 0.035 micrograms per gram and fetal lung at 0.405 plus or minus 0.020 micrograms per gram in that same late-exposure group.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential metric was the fetal-to-maternal residue ratio, which expresses how much chemical accumulates in fetal tissue relative to the corresponding maternal tissue. These ratios were highest in several organs in the gestational day 17 group, particularly the lung, liver, and brain. A ratio approaching or exceeding parity means the fetus is not merely passively receiving trace amounts but is accumulating the compound at concentrations comparable to its mother&#8217;s, whose liver and kidneys would normally be expected to handle the bulk of detoxification. The elevated brain ratios are especially noteworthy because the developing nervous system is uniquely vulnerable during organogenesis, and the blood-brain barrier that protects the adult brain is still immature in fetal life.</p>
<p>Residue burden was only half of the story. In a parallel experiment, the team measured three standard clinical biomarkers of liver injury in maternal plasma: alanine aminotransferase, or ALT; aspartate aminotransferase, or AST; and total bilirubin. These enzymes and pigments are workhorses of clinical hepatology. ALT and AST leak into the bloodstream when hepatocytes, the liver&#8217;s metabolic workhorse cells, are damaged or dying, while bilirubin rises when the liver&#8217;s capacity to process heme breakdown products is compromised. Across all three exposure windows, haloxyfop-R-methyl exposure elevated all three biomarkers, with the highest values again occurring in the gestational day 17 group at terminal sampling. The pattern indicates genuine hepatic biochemical injury, not merely chemical presence, and it appeared at a dose well below the lethal threshold.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to flag an important limitation of the timing comparison. Because all groups were sampled on the same gestational days, 20 and 21, the interval between dosing and sampling differed across groups. Animals dosed on day 3 had roughly eighteen days for the herbicide to be metabolized and cleared before measurement, while animals dosed on day 17 had only three or four. The observed differences among exposure-timing groups therefore cannot cleanly distinguish whether late gestation is intrinsically more vulnerable, or whether the higher residues simply reflect less time for elimination. This confound does not undermine the central findings, that the herbicide reaches fetal tissues and injures the maternal liver, but it does temper interpretation of the window-specific differences.</p>
<p>The study also tested a potential countermeasure. The researchers co-administered two plant-derived flavonoids, narcissin and sophoroflavonoside, alongside the herbicide and measured whether they could blunt the biochemical damage. Flavonoids are a large family of polyphenolic plant compounds known for antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, and prior work by some of the same authors had suggested they might protect liver mitochondria from pesticide-induced dysfunction. In this experiment, both compounds reduced the pesticide-induced elevations in ALT, AST, and bilirubin, but sophoroflavonoside showed greater protective efficacy across most endpoints, with particularly strong effects on bilirubin in the gestational day 3 group and AST in the gestational day 13 group. Standardized effect-size analysis confirmed that the herbicide produced large effects on the biomarkers and that the flavonoid treatments produced measurable, though incomplete, correction.</p>
<p>Why does this matter beyond the laboratory? Haloxyfop belongs to a class of herbicides whose residues are regulated through maximum residue limits set by food safety authorities, including a targeted review of haloxyfop-P limits by the European Food Safety Authority in 2022. Regulatory risk assessment for pesticides has historically focused on adult toxicity and occupational exposure, with developmental exposure windows receiving less granular attention. Studies like this one, which map residue distribution across maternal and fetal organs at specific gestational stages, feed into the tissue residue approach in toxicology, a framework that argues toxicity is better predicted by the amount of chemical actually present in target tissues than by the external dose an animal receives. By pairing residue quantification with clinical biomarkers, the study offers a template for that integrated approach.</p>
<p>Several caveats frame the translation to human health. Rats are not humans, and the pharmacokinetics of haloxyfop-R-methyl, including its ester hydrolysis to the active acid and its species-dependent induction of peroxisome proliferation documented in earlier work, differ across mammals. The single-dose design, while elegant for isolating timing effects, does not capture the repeated low-level exposures that characterize real-world dietary residue intake. And the flavonoid protection, while encouraging, was partial rather than complete, and the doses and mechanisms in rats cannot be directly prescribed as a human intervention. What the study does establish firmly is that a sublethal gestational dose of a common herbicide distributes into fetal organs, produces measurable maternal liver injury, and that timing of exposure shapes the residue profile. For a chemical applied to food crops worldwide, that combination of placental transfer and hepatic injury at one-tenth of the lethal dose is a data point that regulators, farmers, and expectant parents alike will want to watch closely as follow-up studies attempt to disentangle gestational-stage vulnerability from simple clearance kinetics.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Gestational exposure to the herbicide haloxyfop-R-methyl and its maternal and fetal residue distribution and hepatic toxicity in Wistar rats</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Gestational exposure to haloxyfop-R-methyl drives maternal and embryonic residue burden and hepatic biochemical injury in Wistar rats</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Javdatovna, A. M., Parida, M., Komiljonovich, P. M., Abdullayevna, S. G., Abbasovna, A. R., &amp; Waheed, M. (2026). Gestational exposure to haloxyfop-R-methyl drives maternal and embryonic residue burden and hepatic biochemical injury in Wistar rats. <em>Environmental Science and Pollution Research</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38308-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38308-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38308-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11356-026-38308-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> haloxyfop-R-methyl, herbicide, pregnancy, placental transfer, pesticide residues, hepatotoxicity, Wistar rats, LC-MS, flavonoids, narcissin, sophoroflavonoside, developmental toxicology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">272715</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glyphosate Weedkiller Hits Algae Harder Than Its Active Ingredient Alone, Study Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/glyphosate-weedkiller-hits-algae-harder-than-its-active-ingredient-alone-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 11:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidant enzymes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquatic algae toxicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biomarkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-formulants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial formulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological risks of herbicide use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecotoxicology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental research on glyphosate formulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental safety of glyphosate-based products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freshwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freshwater biodiversity and herbicide exposure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glyphosate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glyphosate environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glyphosate formulation vs active ingredient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glyphosate runoff and water pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glyphosate-induced cellular damage in algae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbicide effects on freshwater ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of glyphosate on aquatic food webs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lipid peroxidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microalgae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microalgae vulnerability to herbicides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxidative stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scenedesmus vacuolatus]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=237844</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new Argentine study shows that a commercial glyphosate-based herbicide is roughly seventy times more toxic to the freshwater alga Scenedesmus vacuolatus than its pure active ingredient, overwhelming the alga's antioxidant defenses and damaging its membranes at far lower concentrations.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glyphosate is the most heavily deployed herbicide on the planet, sprayed across millions of hectares of farmland every growing season. Wherever it is applied, rain and irrigation eventually carry it into streams, rivers, and lakes, where it encounters organisms that were never the intended target. Among the most vulnerable of these unintended recipients are the microscopic green algae that form the base of aquatic food webs. A new study published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research by María Mercedes Iummato and colleagues in Argentina has now delivered one of the most detailed portraits yet of what happens inside a freshwater algal cell when glyphosate arrives, and the results carry a warning that goes beyond glyphosate itself: the commercial product is far more damaging than the pure active ingredient it contains.</p>
<p>The research team, drawn from the University of Buenos Aires and Argentina&#8217;s National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), exposed the green microalga Scenedesmus vacuolatus to two different treatments over a 96-hour period. One treatment used the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, or IPAG, which is the active ingredient in many glyphosate-based products, at concentrations of 150, 250, and 350 milligrams per liter. The other used a commercial glyphosate-based formulation, referred to in the study as CFG, at concentrations of 4, 6, and 8 milligrams of acid equivalent per liter. This paired design allowed the researchers to separate the toxicity of glyphosate itself from the toxicity of the so-called inert ingredients that manufacturers blend into commercial products to improve their performance in the field.</p>
<p>The headline finding is stark. The concentration that suppressed algal growth by 50 percent, a standard toxicological benchmark known as the IC50, was 326.11 milligrams per liter for the pure active ingredient but only 4.43 milligrams of acid equivalent per liter for the commercial formulation. In other words, the formulated product achieved the same level of growth inhibition at roughly one-seventieth of the glyphosate concentration required by the active ingredient alone. That enormous gap strongly suggests that the co-formulants, the surfactants and adjuvants that help the herbicide stick to leaves and penetrate plant tissue, are doing much of the biological damage once the product reaches the water.</p>
<p>Growth was only the beginning. When Iummato&#8217;s team looked at photosynthetic pigments, they found that both treatments reduced total chlorophyll content relative to untreated controls, indicating that the herbicide interferes with the alga&#8217;s photosynthetic machinery. The commercial formulation added a further twist: exposed cells increased in volume. Cell enlargement without proportional growth in cell number is a classic sign of disrupted cell division, a pattern that has been documented in other algae exposed to herbicides and that points to an arrest of the reproductive cycle while individual cells continue to expand. For a phytoplankton population, that combination means the community can no longer replace itself at the rate the ecosystem depends on.</p>
<p>To understand the biochemical mechanisms behind these visible effects, the researchers measured a battery of molecular biomarkers that reveal the state of the cell&#8217;s antioxidant defenses and the extent of oxidative damage. When organisms are exposed to chemical stressors, their metabolism generates reactive oxygen species, unstable molecules that attack proteins, lipids, and DNA. Cells respond by ramping up antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), which converts superoxide radicals into hydrogen peroxide, and catalase (CAT), which breaks the hydrogen peroxide down into water and oxygen. A third enzyme, glutathione-S-transferase (GST), helps detoxify harmful compounds by conjugating them with glutathione, a versatile cellular antioxidant. The levels and activities of these molecules serve as an early-warning system, registering stress long before populations collapse.</p>
<p>The two treatments told strikingly different biochemical stories. Algae exposed to the pure active ingredient, IPAG, responded with a coordinated defensive effort: levels of oxidized proteins rose, the ratio of carotene to chlorophyll a increased, glutathione content climbed, and the activities of SOD, CAT, and GST all went up compared with controls. This is the signature of a cell that has detected the threat and mobilized its full antioxidant arsenal against it. The elevated carotene-to-chlorophyll ratio suggests the cells were also reinforcing their pigment shields, since carotenoids quench reactive oxygen species generated in the photosynthetic membranes and protect chlorophyll from photo-oxidative destruction.</p>
<p>The commercial formulation produced a more alarming pattern. Exposed algae showed increased thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, or TBARS, a widely used indicator of lipid peroxidation, meaning the herbicide was literally damaging the fatty membranes that enclose the cell and its organelles. Oxidized proteins accumulated, the carotene-to-chlorophyll ratio rose, glutathione and carotene levels increased, but here the antioxidant enzymes told the opposite story: SOD, CAT, and GST activities all decreased relative to controls. The combination of rising oxidative damage markers and falling antioxidant enzyme activity suggests that the formulation did not merely provoke a defensive response but overwhelmed or impaired it. When the enzymatic defenses falter while lipid peroxidation accelerates, the cell is losing the oxidative battle.</p>
<p>This contrast between the active ingredient and the formulated product is the study&#8217;s most consequential message for environmental regulation. Glyphosate risk assessments have traditionally focused on the active ingredient, treating co-formulants as biologically inert helpers. A growing body of ecotoxicological work, including comparative studies of pesticides on aquatic and soil organisms, has challenged that assumption, and the present findings add algal primary producers to the list of victims. Because algae sit at the foundation of freshwater food webs, suppressing their growth and photosynthesis can ripple upward to zooplankton, fish, and everything that depends on them. The finding that a commercial formulation can be toxic at concentrations tens of times lower than the active ingredient means that water quality criteria based on glyphosate alone may dramatically underestimate the ecological risk of real-world herbicide applications.</p>
<p>The study also carries geographic weight. Glyphosate use is intensive in the agricultural regions of Argentina, particularly the soy-growing Pampas, and monitoring programs have repeatedly detected the herbicide and its degradation product aminomethylphosphonic acid, or AMPA, in surface waters and groundwater across the region. Scenedesmus vacuolatus, the species used in these experiments, is a common freshwater chlorophyte and a standard test organism in algal growth inhibition assays conducted under international testing guidelines, which makes the results directly relevant to regulatory frameworks. The researchers note that both the formulation and the active ingredient negatively affected the alga, altering growth and metabolic parameters including oxidative stress markers, with the commercial formulation causing greater alterations at lower glyphosate concentrations.</p>
<p>What emerges from this multi-biomarker approach is a picture of glyphosate-based herbicides as more than simple weed killers acting on a single plant-specific enzyme. In these algal cells, exposure triggered cascades of oxidative stress, pigment remodeling, protein oxidation, and membrane damage, with the formulated product inflicting a heavier and less recoverable blow than its active ingredient alone. As debates over glyphosate&#8217;s environmental fate continue worldwide, this study adds a technically rigorous data point to the argument that the toxicity of a pesticide product cannot be judged by its active ingredient in isolation. The co-formulants that make the spray effective in the field may be the same compounds that quietly undermine the microscopic engines of aquatic ecosystems, and regulators, the authors&#8217; findings imply, would do well to evaluate the products as they are actually sold and sprayed, not just the molecule on the label.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Toxic effects of a glyphosate-based commercial formulation and its active ingredient on the green microalga Scenedesmus vacuolatus</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Multi-biomarker evaluation of the effects of a glyphosate-based commercial formulation and its active ingredient on the green microalga Scenedesmus vacuolatus</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Iummato, M. M., Graziano, M., Ríos de Molina, M. D. C., &amp; Juárez, Á. B. (2026). Multi-biomarker evaluation of the effects of a glyphosate-based commercial formulation and its active ingredient on the green microalga Scenedesmus vacuolatus. <em>Environmental Science and Pollution Research</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38265-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38265-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38265-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11356-026-38265-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> glyphosate, herbicide, Scenedesmus vacuolatus, microalgae, ecotoxicology, oxidative stress, antioxidant enzymes, biomarkers, commercial formulation, co-formulants, freshwater, lipid peroxidation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">237844</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roadsides Become Pollinator Havens When Mowing Slows and Herbicide Use Narrows</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/roadsides-become-pollinator-havens-when-mowing-slows-and-herbicide-use-narrows/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julie Wynn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 22:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity in linear corridors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flower flies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbicide use and pollinator health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of mowing on pollinator diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insect Conservation and Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insect conservation in agricultural landscapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[native wildflower preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollinator habitats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollinator-friendly land management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollinators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights-of-way]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roadside conservation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roadside habitat restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roadsides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of government policies in roadside ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable roadside maintenance practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban and rural roadside management]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=229391</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A University of Ottawa study found that mowing rural roadsides less often and spraying herbicide only where needed raised pollinator numbers by 45 percent and species diversity by 23 percent.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rural roadsides are among the most overlooked habitats on the North American landscape. Strips of grass and wildflowers running alongside pavement rarely register as conservation territory, yet together they add up to an enormous share of the land managed by municipalities and counties. A new study from the University of Ottawa suggests that these linear corridors could become a lifeline for bees and flower flies with nothing more than a change in maintenance habits. The research, published in the journal Insect Conservation and Diversity, found that simply mowing less often and applying herbicide more precisely increased pollinator abundance by 45 percent and species diversity by 23 percent compared with conventionally managed roadsides.</p>
<p>The study was led by Jessica Forrest, full professor in the Department of Biology at uOttawa&#8217;s Faculty of Science, with lead author Gil Miranda, a former postdoctoral researcher in her laboratory who is now with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Over two summers, the team surveyed rural roadsides in neighbouring jurisdictions around Ottawa, Ontario, where different levels of government maintain vegetation under visibly different regimes. The work was funded through an NSERC Alliance grant and carried out in partnership with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and the Canadian Wildlife Federation, whose staff helped conceive and fund the study as part of its Rights-of-Way as Habitat program.</p>
<p>The comparison hinged on a natural experiment created by administrative boundaries. Lanark County mows its roadsides twice a year and spot-treats only invasive plants such as wild parsnip. The City of Ottawa and the United Counties of Leeds and Grenville, by contrast, mow up to four times a year and apply herbicide more broadly across the right-of-way. Because these jurisdictions sit side by side and share similar soils, climate, and surrounding farmland, the researchers could compare otherwise similar roadside sites and isolate the effect of management alone. The Canadian Wildlife Federation helped pinpoint site pairs that shared comparable surrounding landscapes but fell under different mowing regimes, strengthening the design.</p>
<p>The fieldwork was exhaustive. Miranda netted and identified 3,773 pollinator specimens across 31 sites, a collection that ultimately totaled 153 species: 100 bee species and 53 flower fly species. Species identifications were confirmed through DNA barcoding led by Sophie Cardinal of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, a step that matters enormously in pollinator research, where many species are morphologically similar and easily confused in the field. The numbers told a consistent story. Low-intensity roadsides averaged 27 species per site across the study, while conventionally managed roadsides averaged 22. Abundance followed the same pattern, with far more bees and flower flies recorded along the less intensively maintained corridors.</p>
<p>For Forrest, the magnitude of the effect was the striking part. &#8220;Roadsides aren&#8217;t places most people think of as wildlife habitat, but they add up to a huge amount of land across the country,&#8221; she explained. &#8220;What surprised us wasn&#8217;t that management mattered; it was how much difference two modest changes made.&#8221; The finding reframes roadside vegetation from a liability to be kept tidy into an asset that can be managed cheaply for biodiversity. In agricultural regions, where natural habitat has been largely converted to cropland, these unmowed strips may represent some of the last reliable patches of nesting substrate and forage available to wild bees and hoverflies.</p>
<p>The mechanism behind the result is straightforward ecology. Frequent mowing removes flowering plants before they can bloom, eliminating the nectar and pollen resources that adult pollinators depend on throughout the growing season. It also destroys nest sites for ground-nesting bees and can kill larvae developing in stems. Broad herbicide spraying compounds the damage by suppressing the very flowering forbs, including many native species, that pollinators feed on. Reducing mowing to twice a year allows a community of flowering plants to establish and complete their life cycles, while targeted spot treatment of invasive species such as wild parsnip controls problem plants without stripping out the rest of the vegetation community.</p>
<p>Importantly, the researchers are not arguing that roadsides should be abandoned altogether. &#8220;Roads still need to be safe to drive, and invasive species still need to be managed,&#8221; Forrest noted. &#8220;But our results suggest land managers don&#8217;t have to choose between that and supporting pollinators. Mowing less often and spraying herbicide only where it&#8217;s actually needed rather than across a whole roadside, gets you most of the way there.&#8221; Safety sightlines, drainage, and invasive plant control can all be preserved under a low-intensity regime; the key insight is that blanket maintenance across an entire right-of-way delivers little extra benefit for road safety while imposing a substantial cost on insect communities.</p>
<p>The timing of the findings could hardly be more relevant. Bee and flower fly populations face mounting pressure across North America, squeezed by habitat loss, pesticide exposure, disease, and climate change. A recent continental assessment found that more than one-fifth of native pollinator species are now at elevated risk of extinction. Pollinators underpin the reproduction of a large share of flowering plants and contribute substantially to the yields of many fruit, vegetable, and seed crops, so their decline carries consequences well beyond entomology. Against that backdrop, the Ottawa-area results offer what Forrest describes as a rare bit of good news: a low-cost intervention within reach of virtually any municipality or county that maintains rights-of-way.</p>
<p>That accessibility is arguably the study&#8217;s most powerful message. &#8220;You don&#8217;t need to plant anything new or spend more money to see a benefit,&#8221; Forrest concluded. &#8220;You just need to let the roadside be a little less tidy.&#8221; Unlike pollinator initiatives that require seed mixes, planting programs, or expensive restoration, the changes tested here are essentially cost-saving: fewer mowing passes mean less fuel, labour, and equipment wear, and precision spraying means less herbicide purchased and applied. The study, titled &#8220;Roadside pollinator populations and the negative impact of intensive roadside vegetation maintenance,&#8221; was authored by Gil Miranda, Tracey Etwell, Vincent Fyson, Sophie Cardinal, Carolyn Callaghan, and Jessica Forrest, and was conducted with the support and cooperation of the City of Ottawa, Lanark County, and the United Counties of Leeds and Grenville.</p>
<p>For the thousands of kilometres of rural road crisscrossing farmland and forest across Canada and the United States, the implications are hard to ignore. A modest revision to maintenance schedules and spray protocols, decided at the level of a county public works department, could convert an entire network of roadside strips into connected habitat threads running through otherwise intensively used landscapes. As researchers and conservation groups continue to search for scalable responses to pollinator decline, the Ottawa study suggests that one of the most effective tools available may already be parked in the municipal maintenance shed, waiting to be deployed a little less often.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of roadside vegetation maintenance intensity on pollinator abundance and diversity</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mowing less, spraying smarter gives pollinators a boost</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Mowing less, spraying smarter gives pollinators a boost. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1146347" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> pollinators, roadsides, bees, flower flies, mowing, herbicide, biodiversity, habitat management, Insect Conservation and Diversity, University of Ottawa, conservation, rights-of-way</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">229391</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
