The research highlights that while awareness of perinatal anxiety is rising, various barriers persist within the healthcare system. One of the primary obstacles identified by professionals is the inadequate training regarding mental health issues during perinatal periods. This lack of specific education leaves healthcare providers feeling unprepared to recognize symptoms and offer appropriate interventions to expecting and new mothers who may be struggling. The study emphasizes the necessity of incorporating comprehensive mental health training into standard medical education to better equip healthcare professionals.

Moreover, many healthcare professionals expressed concerns over the stigma attached to mental health issues, which can significantly hinder comprehensive care. The fear of judgment or misunderstanding from colleagues and even patients themselves can result in reluctance to address mental health openly. The research calls for a cultural shift within medical environments, where mental health is treated with the same priority as physical health. Creating an open dialogue could not only encourage practitioners to address these issues but also foster a supportive atmosphere for patients seeking help.

Another barrier reported in the study is the limited access to mental health resources for mothers during the perinatal period. Many healthcare professionals noted that referral pathways for mental health services are often unclear or simply unavailable, leaving patients without the support they may desperately need. This lack of resources can exacerbate anxiety levels in perinatal women, making it imperative that healthcare systems work to establish robust referral networks that ensure patients can easily access mental health services.

On the other hand, the research also points out several facilitators that can enhance the quality of care for perinatal anxiety. For instance, multidisciplinary approaches that include mental health specialists in maternal healthcare settings have proven effective in identifying and managing anxiety. Professionals shared their experiences of collaborations with psychologists and psychiatrists, leading to better treatment outcomes. This integrated approach not only improves patient outcomes but also empowers healthcare practitioners, enhancing their confidence in managing perinatal mental health issues.

Equally important is the role of patient education in optimizing care. When healthcare providers disseminate information regarding potential signs of perinatal anxiety, it enables patients to recognize symptoms in themselves and seek help sooner. The study reinforces the concept that informed patients are more likely to engage proactively in their care, leading to enhanced mental health outcomes. Therefore, equipping patients with the right knowledge should be a central component of perinatal care protocols.

Despite the identified barriers, there exists a strong will among healthcare professionals to improve care for perinatal anxiety. Many practitioners voiced a desire for more structured guidelines that can aid in the early identification and management of anxiety disorders. The researchers advocate for developing clinical practice guidelines informed by the findings of this study, which could serve as essential tools for healthcare providers to follow.

The impact of perinatal anxiety is far-reaching, influencing not only the mental health of mothers but also the development of their children. As maternal mental health has been linked to various developmental outcomes, addressing perinatal anxiety is critical for fostering a healthy environment for both mother and child. Healthcare professionals highlighted the need for ongoing education and access to mental health resources, which would ultimately create a more supportive framework for new mothers.

Furthermore, healthcare systems are encouraged to prioritize mental health parity in their policies, ensuring that mental health services are accessible on par with physical health services. The researchers argue that systemic changes are crucial to bridge the existing gaps in care, facilitating a comprehensive approach that encompasses both mental and physical health. Establishing policies that support mental health accessibility within perinatal care frameworks could dramatically improve outcomes for mothers experiencing anxiety.

Ultimately, the findings from this qualitative investigation provide a compelling narrative that underscores the necessity of addressing perinatal anxiety through multifaceted approaches. By amplifying the voices of healthcare providers, the research opens the door for meaningful discussions surrounding the optimization of care practices. The call for an interdisciplinary framework, an emphasis on training, and broader access to mental health services encapsulates a roadmap towards improved maternal healthcare.

In conclusion, the ongoing exploration of perinatal anxiety illustrates the critical intersections of mental health and maternal care. By prioritizing education, patient engagement, and multidisciplinary collaboration, healthcare systems can pave the way for significant advancements in the management and understanding of perinatal anxiety. This comprehensive approach not only supports mothers in their mental health journey but contributes to the wellbeing of future generations, ensuring a healthier start for both mother and child.

The investigation by Hutton, Delicate, and Moran serves as a clarion call to healthcare professionals to embrace change, challenge stigmas, and ultimately enhance the care provided to women navigating the complexities of perinatal anxiety. As the dialogue continues, the hope lies in creating a world where mental health is treated with dignity, respect, and urgency, particularly during the transformative period of bringing new life into the world.

Subject of Research: Perinatal anxiety and its management in healthcare systems.

Article Title: Healthcare professionals’ views on barriers, facilitators and optimisation of care for perinatal anxiety: a qualitative investigation.

Article References:

Hutton, U., Delicate, A., Moran, P.M. et al. Healthcare professionals’ views on barriers, facilitators and optimisation of care for perinatal anxiety: a qualitative investigation. BMC Health Serv Res (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13930-z

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI:

Keywords: Perinatal anxiety, healthcare professionals, barriers, facilitators, mental health, maternal health, qualitative research.

Patient-centered care is a cornerstone of modern healthcare practices, emphasizing the importance of tailoring healthcare services to meet the individual needs and preferences of patients. In China, where the healthcare system is grappling with challenges such as rapid population aging and increasing chronic disease prevalence, understanding the preferences of both patients and healthcare professionals is critical. The insights garnered from this research can inform policy-making and improve the overall quality of care delivered to patients in various healthcare settings across the nation.

To conduct this research, the authors employed a robust methodology that involved gathering quantitative data through best-worst scaling. This approach allowed participants to evaluate multiple attributes of integrated care by selecting the ‘best’ and ‘worst’ aspects of their experiences. By doing so, the study not only highlighted the most valued elements of patient-centered care but also illuminated which factors were deemed less important. This dual insight is invaluable for shaping future healthcare policies and practices in China, where the demand for high-quality, responsive care is on the rise.

One of the intriguing aspects of the study was the recruitment of a diverse cohort of participants that included both patients and healthcare professionals from various specialties. This inclusivity enriches the study’s findings, allowing for a broader perspective on patient care preferences. Additionally, the diversity adds layers to understanding the complex dynamics at play in the Chinese healthcare environment. By carefully analyzing feedback from both demographics, the research team was able to uncover contrasts and similarities that illuminate the shared goals and unique priorities of patients and healthcare providers alike.

The findings of this comparative analysis indicate that, while there are many shared values, distinct preferences do exist between patients and healthcare professionals regarding integrated care. For instance, patients may prioritize accessibility and emotional support as critical components of their healthcare experiences, while healthcare providers may place a higher emphasis on clinical outcomes and operational efficiency. Understanding these preferences is crucial for designing integrated care models that satisfy both parties, thus fostering a more collaborative environment that benefits health outcomes.

Furthermore, the implications of this research extend beyond academic interest; they hold potential ramifications for health policy formulation. Policymakers can utilize these insights to enhance integrated care strategies, ensuring that they are aligned with both patient desires and healthcare professional capabilities. As China continues to reform its healthcare system, integrating feedback from both patients and providers will be essential in developing comprehensive policies that ensure sustainable and effective healthcare delivery.

In light of the ongoing transition toward integrated care models, the study underscores the importance of adopting a collaborative approach in healthcare settings. By fostering open communication between patients and healthcare professionals, the chances of developing care plans that accurately reflect patient needs are significantly enhanced. The results of this study can guide training programs for healthcare professionals to better understand and appreciate the perspectives of their patients, ultimately leading to a more patient-centric healthcare landscape.

Additionally, the study reveals potential areas for future research. Understanding the cultural and contextual factors that influence patient and provider preferences can provide deeper insights into how integrated care can be effectively implemented across different regions in China. Future studies might delve into the impact of socioeconomic status, urban vs. rural healthcare disparities, and the role of technology in shaping expectations and experiences. These avenues of exploration could further refine the understanding of integrated care within the evolving landscape of Chinese healthcare.

This research represents a necessary step in bridging the gap between patient preferences and healthcare professional practices. By emphasizing collaboration and mutual understanding, it illuminates the path toward a more integrated and responsive healthcare system. The findings advocate for actionable strategies to enhance communication and partnership between patients and providers, strengthening the foundation of patient-centered care in China.

In conclusion, the study by Yin and colleagues is not merely an academic exercise; it serves as a clarion call for a more attentive and inclusive approach to healthcare provision. As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, the voices of both patients and providers must be recognized and valued, ensuring that the future of healthcare is built on a solid foundation of mutual respect and understanding.

With the rapid advancement of healthcare practices, studies like this one are vital in guiding stakeholders toward creating a more integrated and patient-oriented system. Ultimately, the goal is to foster an environment where healthcare decisions are made collaboratively, leading to improved health outcomes for all segments of the population.

This comprehensive analysis contributes to an expanding body of literature that seeks to understand and harness patient and provider preferences in delivering quality care. By highlighting where interests align and diverge, it lays essential groundwork for future innovations in healthcare delivery, emphasizing that the best patient care arises from uniting the expertise of healthcare professionals with the insights of those they serve.

As this research makes its way into policy-making discussions and healthcare practices in China, it stands to reshape how integrated care is conceptualized and operationalized, with the potential for broader implications in the global discourse on patient-centered healthcare.

Subject of Research: Preferences for Patient-Centered Integrated Care in China

Article Title: Comparing patient and healthcare professional preferences for patient-centered integrated care in China: a best-worst scaling study

Article References:

Yin, Y., Gao, W., Cui, X. et al. Comparing patient and healthcare professional preferences for patient-centered integrated care in China: a best-worst scaling study.
BMC Health Serv Res (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13957-2

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-13957-2

Keywords: Patient-Centered Care, Integrated Care, Healthcare Preferences, China, Best-Worst Scaling, Health Policy.

The study employs a qualitative approach, allowing for an in-depth examination of personal narratives from healthcare professionals who work directly with pregnant women. Notably, the perspectives of nurses and midwives are central, as they are often the first point of contact in the healthcare system for expectant mothers. Their insights provide valuable context regarding the barriers and enablers that shape women’s experiences with ANC. This immersive methodology offers richness to the data, breaking down complex themes into relatable human experiences.

One critical finding of the study is the acknowledgment that socio-economic status plays a significant role in women’s access to ANC services. Many participants discussed how financial constraints prevent women from attending regular check-ups, leading to potential health risks for both mothers and their infants. It’s evident that economic barriers can be a daunting hurdle, overshadowing the healthcare systems put in place. On a broader scale, this highlights the necessity for policy initiatives that address these socio-economic disparities to ensure all women can benefit from essential prenatal care.

Further compounding economic barriers are cultural beliefs that can restrict women’s autonomy regarding healthcare decisions. The study reveals that some women feel limited by societal expectations and gender norms, impacting their ability to seek necessary care. Nurses and midwives emphasized the cultural dynamics at play, advocating for community education and engagement strategies that empower women to prioritize their health. By challenging these norms, there is an opportunity to fundamentally change how women perceive and access maternal healthcare services.

Additionally, the study illuminated the importance of the emotional and psychological factors influencing women’s healthcare behavior. The sentiments shared by healthcare professionals highlighted how feelings of shame or stigma associated with seeking help can deter women from utilizing ANC services. Midwives, in particular, expressed the necessity of fostering a supportive and non-judgmental environment where women feel safe and comfortable seeking care. This calls for a cultural shift within healthcare settings, emphasizing compassion and understanding over prescription and protocol.

Another focal point of the research is the communication gap that often exists between healthcare providers and expectant mothers. Nurses voiced concerns over the lack of effective communication strategies when engaging with women, which can lead to misconceptions and a lack of trust in the healthcare system. The importance of creating clear, empathetic channels of communication cannot be overstated. Educating healthcare providers on how to convey information in an accessible and relatable manner could significantly enhance women’s adherence to ANC practices.

Institutional support also emerged as a vital theme in the study, with healthcare workers stressing the need for adequate resources and training to properly support women through their ANC journeys. Many midwives reported feeling overwhelmed by their responsibilities, often juggling multiple patients simultaneously without sufficient support. This raises critical questions about the infrastructure and systemic changes needed in the healthcare system to ensure that nurses and midwives are adequately equipped to provide high-quality care.

As healthcare systems worldwide increasingly adopt technology, the study suggests that digital health initiatives could offer innovative solutions to improve women’s adherence to ANC services. Mobile health solutions, which include reminders and educational resources, have the potential to bridge gaps in access and information. When implemented effectively, these technologies could provide women with the tools they need to manage their healthcare proactively, ultimately leading to better maternal and infant outcomes.

The issues raised by this comprehensive study also point toward the necessity of interdisciplinary collaboration in addressing the multifaceted challenges of ANC adherence. Involving community leaders, educational institutions, and local organizations in the healthcare narrative can pave the way for more holistic solutions. By fostering partnerships across sectors, there is a greater potential for creating an ecosystem of support that encourages women to prioritize their health.

In conclusion, the qualitative insights gleaned from this study offer a roadmap for future research and healthcare strategies aimed at bolstering women’s adherence to ANC services in Rwanda. The perspectives shared by nurses and midwives not only highlight the complexities surrounding this issue but also provide a basis for targeted interventions. The call to action is clear: to create a healthcare environment where all women feel empowered to access the care they need, we must address the structural, cultural, and emotional barriers that exist.

As we look toward a future where maternal healthcare can be accessed equitably, the lessons learned from this study can serve as a catalyst for change. By amplifying the voices of those at the forefront of care, we can work together toward a healthcare landscape that truly meets the needs of women and ensures a healthier tomorrow for families and communities across Rwanda.

Subject of Research:

Article Title:

Article References:

Tengera, O., Meharry, P., Uwamahoro, M.C. et al. ‘We truly feel limited’: nurses and midwives’ perspectives on multi-level factors influencing women’s adherence to ANC in Rwanda: a qualitative study.
BMC Health Serv Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13902-3

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI:

Keywords:

This qualitative study focuses on the exploration of the various implementation barriers that hinder the integration of mental health programs within primary healthcare systems. It emphasizes the necessity of understanding cultural, organizational, and systemic factors that contribute to the challenges faced by health professionals in delivering mental health services. With Iran as the focal point, the research reflects on the unique sociocultural aspects that intertwine with the healthcare framework, offering a localized perspective on a universally relevant issue.

The researchers, Salehi, Hormozi, and Marvi, conducted extensive interviews with healthcare providers, program administrators, and patients to gather firsthand accounts of their experiences. This rich qualitative data not only highlights the barriers but also illustrates the personal stories behind the numbers. Such narratives are invaluable in providing a depth of understanding that quantitative data alone cannot achieve. The findings illuminate how stigma, lack of training, and insufficient resources can pose significant barriers to effective mental health service delivery.

Stigma surrounding mental health issues is a prevalent barrier that transcends cultural boundaries. In the Iranian context, it manifests in various forms, including social disapproval and familial concerns. Healthcare providers often feel reluctant to address mental health during consultations, fearing repercussions from patients or their families. This hesitation can result in missed opportunities for diagnosis and intervention, perpetuating a cycle of suffering for those in need. Furthermore, the participants shared that stigma can deter individuals from seeking help altogether, exacerbating the public health crisis.

Training and capacity building for primary healthcare providers emerge as another critical barrier in the study. Many healthcare professionals reported feeling ill-equipped to handle mental health issues due to a lack of robust educational curricula during their training. This gap leads to a reliance on outdated practices or inadequate referrals to mental health specialists, thus compromising the quality of care provided. The researchers emphasize the urgent need for comprehensive training programs to equip providers with the necessary skills to recognize and manage mental health conditions effectively.

Resource allocation also surfaced as a significant obstacle to implementing mental health programs. The participants highlighted that insufficient funding and materials for mental health services lead to a lack of available treatments and supports. For example, mental health clinics often struggle with inadequate staffing levels, resulting in longer waiting times for patients and decreased access to care. Without adequate resources, even well-designed programs cannot achieve their intended outcomes; hence, addressing this barrier is fundamental to improving mental health care delivery.

Cultural attitudes towards mental health further complicate the implementation of effective programs. Many practitioners noted that certain mental health issues, such as depression and anxiety, might be viewed as personal weaknesses or character flaws rather than medical conditions. Such perspectives can limit the efficacy of interventions and create an environment where mental health discussions are sidelined in favor of more accepted physical health issues. Changing these cultural narratives requires a concerted effort involving community education, advocacy, and public health initiatives aimed at reshaping perceptions around mental health.

In addition to cultural barriers, organizational factors play a critical role in the successful implementation of mental health programs. The study revealed that organizational structures within healthcare settings can either facilitate or hinder the provision of integrated mental health services. For instance, fragmented communication between healthcare providers and mental health specialists can result in misaligned treatment plans. Establishing collaborative protocols and clear channels of communication is essential for ensuring that all stakeholders are working towards a common goal of improving patient outcomes.

The transition to a more integrated care model, where mental health services are seamlessly incorporated into primary care, is a vital recommendation emerging from the study. This approach not only enhances service delivery but also reduces the stigma associated with seeking mental health care. By normalizing mental health discussions within general healthcare, practitioners can help foster an environment where patients feel safe and supported. Additionally, integrating mental health into primary care can lead to more holistic treatment plans that address both physical and mental health needs.

Furthermore, the study calls attention to the importance of tailoring mental health programs to meet the unique needs of diverse populations. Individuals’ experiences with mental health can vary widely based on cultural, social, and economic contexts. The researchers stress that a one-size-fits-all approach is insufficient; instead, programs should be adaptable and responsive to the specific challenges faced by different communities. By ensuring that mental health initiatives are culturally competent, healthcare providers can enhance their effectiveness and reach.

In light of these findings, it becomes evident that addressing the barriers to mental health program implementation requires a multifaceted approach. Stakeholders at all levels, including government officials, healthcare providers, educators, and community leaders, must collaborate to create an enabling environment for mental health care. This grassroots engagement is essential for driving change and improving the mental health landscape countrywide.

Ultimately, the research conducted by Salehi and colleagues provides a valuable framework for understanding the complex interplay of factors that influence the implementation of mental health programs in primary healthcare settings. As mental health emerges as a crucial public health issue, addressing these barriers is integral to developing effective, sustainable solutions. This study not only highlights the challenges faced in Iran but also serves as a blueprint for other nations grappling with similar issues. As global mental health awareness continues to grow, the lessons learned from this research can inform efforts worldwide.

In conclusion, the qualitative study offers critical insights into the barriers that impede the successful implementation of mental health programs in primary healthcare. By understanding the multifaceted nature of these challenges, healthcare systems can begin to develop strategies to overcome them, ultimately leading to better mental health outcomes for all. As mental health continues to gain traction in public discourse, it is imperative that we heed these lessons to create a more inclusive and effective healthcare framework.

Subject of Research: Barriers to implementation of mental health programs in primary healthcare in Iran.

Article Title: Exploring implementation barriers of mental health programs in primary health care: a qualitative study from Iran.

Article References:

Salehi, M., Hormozi, F., Marvi, A. et al. Exploring implementation barriers of mental health programs in primary health care: a qualitative study from Iran.
BMC Health Serv Res 25, 1555 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13702-9

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13702-9

Keywords: Mental health barriers, primary healthcare, implementation, qualitative study, Iran.

The research stems from an urgent need to ensure that patients who have undergone PCI continue to take their prescribed antiplatelet therapy as directed. Non-adherence to such recommendations can lead to dire consequences, including the recurrence of cardiovascular events. The study aims to explore the perceptions of healthcare providers who are on the front lines of patient care, including doctors, nurses, and pharmacists, thus providing a comprehensive overview of their experiences and challenges regarding medication adherence.

One notable finding from the study is the significant presence of communication barriers in the healthcare setting. Professionals indicated that misunderstandings between medical staff and patients often contributed to patients not fully grasping the importance of their antiplatelet regimens. Many patients appeared to have varying levels of health literacy, which complicated discussions around medication adherence. This gap in understanding can result in patients failing to appreciate the significance of their therapy in preventing future cardiovascular complications.

Interestingly, the study also emphasizes the enablers that can enhance patient adherence to antiplatelet therapy. Healthcare professionals identified the pivotal role of thorough patient education highlighting the need for clear communication regarding the purpose and benefits of antiplatelet medications. When patients are effectively informed about how these medications work to prevent blood clots and protect their heart health, they are more likely to commit to their prescribed regimens.

Moreover, the role of follow-up care emerged as a crucial aspect influencing adherence. The study revealed that regular follow-ups and check-ins with patients foster a sense of accountability and support, making them more likely to adhere to their medication schedules. Building a rapport through frequent interactions allows healthcare professionals to address any concerns, answer questions, and provide reassurances, all of which contribute to a positive adherence experience.

The influence of cultural factors on medication adherence was another compelling aspect uncovered during the research. The healthcare professionals recognized that cultural beliefs and societal norms had a profound impact on patient attitudes towards medications. In some cases, traditional medicine practices might discourage patients from adhering to prescribed treatments, leading to conflicting viewpoints on the necessity of antiplatelet therapy and contributing to non-compliance.

The findings reveal that the healthcare environment itself can either hinder or promote patient adherence. Workload pressures, staff shortages, and high patient-to-nurse ratios can impede the ability of healthcare professionals to provide individualized attention to patients. Consequently, when healthcare providers are overwhelmed, they may have less time to engage meaningfully with patients, potentially affecting the quality of education around medication adherence and ultimately impacting patient outcomes.

Interestingly, the study also pointed to the potential of technology as a tool for improving adherence rates. Many healthcare providers expressed enthusiasm for utilizing mobile applications and reminder systems to prompt patients to take their medications. The study’s respondents believed that technological solutions could bridge the communication gap and reinforce the importance of adherence outside clinical settings, thereby making it easier for patients to remain on track with their prescribed therapies.

Certainly, the input from healthcare professionals regarding systemic challenges also highlighted the limitations of current healthcare policies surrounding post-PCI care. Inadequate reimbursement models for follow-up consultations and patient education efforts were cited as hurdles. Many healthcare professionals felt that policy changes prioritizing adherence education and follow-up care could vastly improve patient outcomes and potentially reduce the healthcare burden associated with recurrent cardiovascular events.

In summation, the study underscores not just the barriers that impede antiplatelet adherence, but also shines a light on actionable solutions that stem from healthcare professionals’ insights. Understanding these challenges and embracing effective strategies can pave the way for enhanced adherence rates, ultimately leading to better outcomes for patients following PCI. As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, integrating the perspectives of those directly involved in patient care remains crucial for driving improvements in adherence and chronic disease management.

The implications of this research extend beyond the specific confines of Saudi Arabia, shedding light on a universal challenge faced by healthcare systems worldwide. By embracing collaborative efforts to address barriers and enhance support mechanisms, healthcare providers across the globe can work towards ensuring that patients are not only informed but empowered to maintain their antiplatelet therapies following PCI, thus fulfilling the goal of optimal cardiovascular health.

With such revelations emerging from this dedicated qualitative study, the hopes for improving patient care practices stand strong. The recommendations drawn from healthcare professionals’ perspectives can be instrumental in shaping policies and reforming existing practices to foster a culture of adherence — a paradigm shift that could ultimately lead to lives saved and improved quality of life for countless patients navigating their recovery journey.

As efforts continue to translate research into practice, it is imperative that we listen to the voices of healthcare professionals who understand the nuances of their patients’ challenges. By fostering open dialogue, utilizing technology, and enhancing education, the gap between prescription and adherence can be effectively bridged, ensuring that patients reap the full benefits of their antiplatelet therapies.

Through this study, we are reminded of the vital role that continuous education, patient-centered communication, and systemic support play in the journey towards optimal patient adherence. Let us remain vigilant in fostering an environment where healthcare professionals feel empowered to advocate for their patients’ adherence, leading us towards a future where the negative impacts of non-adherence become a relic of the past.

The findings of this research hold the promise of establishing best practices and paving the way for enhanced patient care protocols that prioritize adherence to antiplatelet therapy post-PCI. In doing so, we nurture a healthier society, ensuring that individuals are not lost to unnecessary complications, but rather supported through their recovery towards holistic health and wellness.

In conclusion, the exploration of healthcare professionals’ perspectives on barriers and enablers of antiplatelet adherence opens new avenues for study and improvement. It emphasizes a collaborative approach, prioritizing education, and understanding patient needs as crucial steps in the journey of recovery post-PCI.

Subject of Research: Barriers and enablers of antiplatelet adherence after PCI

Article Title: Exploring healthcare professionals’ perspectives on barriers and enablers of antiplatelet adherence after PCI: a multisite qualitative study in Saudi Arabia

Article References:

Alodhailah, A.M., Lam, L., Almutairi, A.A. et al. Exploring healthcare professionals’ perspectives on barriers and enablers of antiplatelet adherence after PCI: a multisite qualitative study in Saudi Arabia. BMC Nurs 24, 1393 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04067-9

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-04067-9

Keywords: Antiplatelet therapy, PCI, healthcare professionals, medication adherence, patient education, follow-up care, cultural factors, technology in healthcare, systemic challenges.