The urgency of addressing multimorbidity stems from its increasing prevalence globally, particularly in aging populations. As individuals live longer, they often grapple with various health conditions simultaneously, creating a unique scenario that simple, condition-specific interventions cannot adequately address. The necessity for integrated healthcare systems that consider the whole patient rather than isolated symptoms is paramount. This study by He and colleagues dives into this crucial area of research.

Employing the Servqual Model, which is traditionally used to measure service quality in various industries, including healthcare, the researchers aimed to offer a comprehensive evaluation of care quality in integrated health services. The Servqual Model examines dimensions such as reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy, and tangibles, which are invaluable in understanding how health services can be tailored to better suit the needs of patients with multiple health issues. This innovative approach sheds light on the multi-faceted nature of patient experience in healthcare settings.

One of the key findings of this research highlights a significant gap between patients’ expectations and their actual experiences regarding the quality of integrated care. The authors noted that although healthcare facilities rated their services highly based on operational metrics, patients often reported feeling dissatisfactory due to unaddressed holistic needs. This discrepancy underscores the importance of aligning healthcare delivery with patient expectations, which is critical for improving overall care satisfaction and health outcomes.

Furthermore, the study emphasizes the need for healthcare practitioners to adopt a more patient-centric model. In addressing multiple chronic conditions, providers must engage patients in shared decision-making processes that honor their preferences and values. This patient-centered approach is not only beneficial in enhancing satisfaction but is also linked to better adherence to treatment regimens and improved health outcomes. The research reinforces the need for ongoing education and training for healthcare professionals to foster these necessary skills.

Aside from healthcare practitioners, policymakers have a pivotal role to play in enhancing the quality of care for individuals with multimorbidity. The study suggests that creating frameworks that promote integrated care models is essential. This could involve policy adjustments that encourage collaboration among various healthcare providers, including specialists and primary care practitioners, ensuring that all parties are working toward common goals in patient management.

Moreover, the study points to the imperative of investing in health information technology. A well-functioning health IT system can facilitate better communication between providers and patients, ensuring that care is cohesive and comprehensive. Such technology could help in tracking patient outcomes more effectively, managing appointments, and ensuring that all members of the healthcare team are informed of the patient’s health history and treatment plans.

As this research highlights the intricacies of caring for patients with multimorbidity, it calls for further exploration into the impact of social determinants of health. Addressing factors such as socioeconomic status, education, and access to healthcare resources is crucial for comprehensive care. The findings suggest that without addressing these social elements, the healthcare system risks continuing a cycle of inadequate care and poor health outcomes.

The repercussions of this work extend beyond the borders of China, suggesting pathways for healthcare systems worldwide grappling with similar challenges. The insights gleaned from the analysis can serve as a case study for other nations, especially those with burgeoning aging populations or those that have recently adopted integrated care models. Sharing best practices and lessons learned in the realm of multimorbidity care could foster global advancements in public health.

In conclusion, the research conducted by He and colleagues provides critical insights into the quality of integrated care for patients with multimorbidity in China. It underscores the need for a systemic transformation in how care is delivered, emphasizing patient-centric approaches, effective collaboration among healthcare providers, investment in technology, and consideration of social determinants of health. As health systems continue to evolve, the findings of this study will undoubtedly contribute to shifting paradigms in the treatment of chronic diseases and improving health outcomes for one of the most vulnerable patient populations.

The study’s impact may be felt not only through improvements in healthcare delivery but also in the broader discourse surrounding multimorbidity. As researchers and practitioners alike reflect on these findings, there is hope for the creation of more robust, cohesive, and effective healthcare systems that improve the quality of life for millions of individuals facing multiple chronic health challenges. Addressing the complexities of multimorbidity is not merely a healthcare challenge; it is a social imperative and an ethical obligation that requires the collective commitment of all stakeholders involved in patient care.

By fostering a deeper understanding of the intersection between care quality and patient experiences, this research paves the way for informed strategies that can ultimately lead to enhanced care for those with multimorbidity. The time to act is now, as health systems worldwide must unite in the pursuit of better outcomes, advocating for the needs of patients who navigate the turbulent waters of chronic illness in their daily lives.

Through the prism of the Servqual Model, we gain an invaluable perspective not only on the quality of care delivered but also on the journey patients undertake through the healthcare system. This multifaceted approach serves as a reminder of the complexities inherent in integrated care and the essential changes required to meet the growing demands of a changing population. Each patient’s story is unique, and as healthcare systems evolve, they must be ready to address these narratives with empathy, understanding, and dedication.

Moreover, it is crucial that the healthcare community remains vigilant and responsive in adapting to emerging trends and challenges in multimorbidity management. This study serves as a springboard for ongoing research and discussion, prompting critical inquiries into how best to serve the diverse and ever-changing needs of patients. By harnessing the findings from this analysis, there is potential to catalyze a movement toward redefining what it means to deliver high-quality, integrated care.

In essence, the exploration of care quality in the context of multimorbidity not only highlights deficiencies but also offers a roadmap for future improvements. It is not merely about measuring service quality but rather transforming the healthcare landscape into one that genuinely values patient experiences, ultimately leading to better health outcomes and enhanced quality of life for those affected by multiple chronic conditions.

Subject of Research: Quality of integrated care for patients with multimorbidity in China

Article Title: Quality of integrated care for patients with multimorbidity in China: a Servqual Model analysis.

Article References:

He, A., Guo, Z., Li, C. et al. Quality of integrated care for patients with multimorbidity in China: a Servqual Model analysis.
BMC Health Serv Res (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14067-3

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12913-026-14067-3

Keywords: multimorbidity, integrated care, Servqual Model, healthcare quality, patient-centered approach, chronic conditions, health policy, patient experiences.

The introduction of robotics into the elderly care sector is not merely about technological advancement, but rather reflects a response to the demographic shifts occurring in many nations. Japan is particularly illustrative of this trend; with one of the highest life expectancies globally, the pressure to sustain a viable care system has intensified. The study sheds light on various organizational factors that are correlated with the embracing of care robots, uncovering insights that could be applied elsewhere, as nations grapple with similar issues of an aging populace.

The implications of the findings from this three-year pooled cross-sectional study are significant. One of the clear trends observed is the willingness of care providers to invest in robotic technologies as a means of alleviating some of the operational burdens associated with long-term care. The analysis reveals that organizations that possess a strong commitment to innovation are more likely to adopt care robots. This alignment between an organization’s vision and the incorporation of advanced technologies is crucial for propelling forward the evolution of care delivery.

Notably, the study identifies leadership engagement as a determining factor in the decision-making process for adopting care robots. When leadership demonstrates a proactive approach and dedication to exploring innovative solutions, organizations are more likely to allocate resources toward the integration of robotic aids. This finding underscores the importance of top-down support when it comes to the successful implementation of new technologies within the healthcare framework.

Another significant factor to consider is the training and education of staff members. Care robots, while designed to facilitate improved care delivery, require specialized skills and knowledge to operate effectively. The research indicates that organizations with robust training protocols in place tend to achieve higher levels of robot adoption. This highlights the necessity for healthcare facilities not only to focus on acquiring technology but also to invest in the continuous education and development of their workforce.

The study further reveals that the socio-economic context in which a care provider operates can influence the adoption of care robots. Facilities situated in urban environments with higher funding opportunities appear more likely to adopt such technologies. These organizational disparities pave the way for a broader discussion regarding equitability in access to technological innovations in healthcare. Facilities in rural or economically disadvantaged areas may struggle to keep pace, thus exacerbating existing inequalities in care quality.

Moreover, collaboration with technology developers is indicated as a beneficial approach for organizations looking to adopt care robots. Active partnerships allow for the tailoring of robotic features to meet the specific needs of care providers, facilitating smoother integration and potentially alleviating apprehensions related to new technology adoption. The study lays the groundwork for further exploration into how such collaborations can be optimized to yield positive outcomes for all stakeholders involved in the care process.

The perception of care robots amongst both staff and residents is pivotal in forecasting adoption rates. Factors such as acceptance and trust must be addressed to ensure the seamless incorporation of robotic technology into care settings. The researchers emphasize the necessity for initiatives aimed at promoting positive attitudes towards robotic assistants, mitigating fears that may arise from misconceptions or biases against robotics in healthcare.

Additionally, the interplay between organizational culture and technology adoption stands out as a key theme in the findings. A culture that encourages experimentation and acceptance of change is integral to the successful implementation of care robotics. Organizations that prioritize adaptability and openness to novel concepts are better positioned to leverage advancements in technology for the benefit of their residents.

As the results of this study circulate within the academic and healthcare communities, a key question arises regarding the broader implications for health policy. Policymakers must take into account the diverse factors influencing technology adoption highlighted in this research. Creating an environment that nurtures innovation, prioritizes workforce training, and promotes equity in access to new technologies will be essential in driving forward the use of care robots in long-term care.

In conclusion, the comprehensive insights provided by Tosaka, Funada, and Goto serve as a valuable resource for understanding the complexities surrounding the adoption of care robots in long-term care contexts. As the societal need for effective elder care escalates, the lessons derived from this research may serve as a guiding framework for organizations around the globe contemplating similar technological integrations. The study ultimately underscores that the future of elder care may very well hinge upon a harmonious partnership between human care providers and robotic aides.

The exploration of organization-level factors associated with care robot adoption reflects the need for continuous research and dialogue among all stakeholders in the healthcare ecosystem. As we move forward, it will be critical to monitor evolving trends, share best practices, and adapt strategies that ensure the optimal use of technology in meeting the diverse needs of aging populations.

Subject of Research: Organization-level factors related to the adoption of care robots in long-term care providers.

Article Title: Organization-level factors associated with the adoption of care robots in long-term care providers: insights from a 3-year pooled cross-sectional study in Japan.

Article References:

Tosaka, Y., Funada, S. & Goto, R. Organization-level factors associated with the adoption of care robots in long-term care providers: insights from a 3-year pooled cross-sectional study in Japan.
BMC Health Serv Res (2026). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-14082-4

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12913-026-14082-4

Keywords: Care robots, long-term care, technology adoption, healthcare innovation, elder care, organizational factors.

As telemedicine becomes an increasingly viable alternative for healthcare delivery, especially post-pandemic, understanding its role in addressing substance use disorders has emerged as a significant area of interest. The findings indicate that regions implementing telemedicine payment parity may experience drastically reduced overdose rates, suggesting that financial barriers are a considerable determinant of health outcomes. These revelations not only prompt discussions on medical economics but also urge policymakers to consider the implications of equitable payment structures.

At the core of the report is the notion that access to treatment services can be significantly enhanced through telemedicine. By enabling patients to engage with healthcare providers without the need for physical travel, especially in rural and underserved areas, telemedicine can play a pivotal role in improving access to treatment programs for substance use. The study’s authors argue that when reimbursement policies are designed to support telehealth services equivalently to traditional in-person care, it fosters greater utilization of these essential resources.

Moreover, the research underscores a critical finding: in regions where payment parity exists, more healthcare providers are likely to offer telemedicine services. This availability translates into increased patient engagement, which is crucial for effective interventions in addiction medicine. The report indicates that individuals struggling with substance use disorders are often at a disadvantage when it comes to accessibility, making telemedicine a game-changer if adequately supported through policy frameworks.

The implications of this research extend far beyond economic considerations. There is a moral and social dimension to the conversation—the urgency of addressing the devastating impacts of the opioid epidemic cannot be overstated. While the ascent of telemedicine was accelerated by necessity during the COVID-19 pandemic, the question remains whether these service delivery innovations will be sustained and expanded in an equitable manner. Payment parity emerges as a vital piece of the puzzle, connecting financial viability with public health objectives.

Chen, Diagne, and Block emphasize the importance of continual assessment and adaptation of telehealth policies as the healthcare landscape evolves. As new modalities of care gain traction, there must be a deliberate effort to ensure that they do not inadvertently perpetuate existing disparities in healthcare access. This report serves as both a cautionary tale and a hopeful blueprint—pointing to tangible strategies that can be implemented to bridge gaps in care for vulnerable populations.

In delving into the specifics of overdose rates, the researchers provide compelling evidence linking improved access to treatment via telemedicine and enhanced recovery outcomes. Their analysis reveals that integrating telemedicine into treatment plans can facilitate timely interventions, which are crucial in curbing the prevalence of overdose incidents. This synergy between technology and treatment presents a promising avenue for reforming how substance abuse is approached at a systemic level.

As health systems grapple with the dual challenges of an opioid crisis and the maturation of digital health services, the authors call for an urgent recalibration of priorities within healthcare policy. The potential benefits of telemedicine have been laid out clearly—reduced barriers to access, increased provider offerings, and ultimately, a lifeline for individuals in need of urgent care. However, these advantages can only be fully realized if payment structures are aligned with the realities of modern healthcare delivery.

The report also touches upon the necessity for data-driven policy design—a theme that resonates deeply within the current discourse surrounding healthcare reform. Empirical evidence, as presented by the researchers, must guide the decisions made by policymakers to ensure that telemedicine becomes not just a stopgap measure, but a fundamental aspect of our healthcare system. The notion of payment parity is not merely an economic consideration; it embodies a commitment to reducing health disparities and ultimately promoting social equity.

In light of these findings, healthcare stakeholders, including insurers and government entities, are urged to take bold actions. Comprehensive strategies must be constructed to ensure that telemedicine is not relegated to the shadows once the public health crisis subsides. Payment parity is a crucial lever for change, and its implementation could play a crucial role in preventing future overdose tragedies.

As the research suggests, there is an undeniable link between equitable payments for telemedicine services and the broader goal of addressing the opioid epidemic. Without concerted efforts to integrate telemedicine into standard care protocols with adequate financial support, the substantial gains made during recent crises risk stagnation or regression. The path forward mandates a collaborative approach, integrating multiple stakeholders united in the goal of improving public health outcomes.

As we reflect on these findings, an invigorated dialogue is necessary—one that thoughtfully examines how telemedicine can not only supplement but potentially transform care delivery. The intersection of technology and healthcare policy presents vast opportunities, and with the right frameworks in place, we can realign our healthcare systems to better serve those most at risk, championing recovery and resilience in the face of adversity.

The implications of this report resonate on a national level, prompting urgency in legislative reform and healthcare practice adaptation. By embracing telemedicine payment parity, we could see a monumental shift in the trajectory of overdose rates. Such action is not just a healthcare imperative; it is, at its core, a profound moral obligation to serve those who are often overlooked in the traditional frameworks of care.

In their compelling report, Chen, Diagne, and Block advocate for a bold vision of healthcare—a landscape where treatment for substance use disorders is accessible, effective, and inherently equitable. Their insights offer a clarion call to action, urging health systems to invest in the future of care that is inclusive and responsive to the multifaceted challenges presented by crises like the opioid epidemic.

Subject of Research: Telemedicine Payment Parity and its Impact on Overdose Rates

Article Title: Concise Research Report: Telemedicine Payment Parity and Overdose Rates

Article References:

Chen, J.C., Diagne, S. & Block, A.E. Concise Research Report: Telemedicine Payment Parity and Overdose Rates.J GEN INTERN MED (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09875-y

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09875-y

Keywords: Telemedicine, Payment Parity, Overdose Rates, Substance Use Disorders, Health Policy, Healthcare Access, Opioid Crisis, Treatment Accessibility, Economic Impact, Recovery Outcomes.

The context for this research is especially significant considering the rapid adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic, when hospitals worldwide were forced to adapt quickly to maintain healthcare delivery amid lockdowns and social distancing measures. While video consultations surged during these times, hesitance about their long-term applicability persisted among many healthcare providers, often due to concerns about effectiveness or technological barriers for patients. This trial decisively addresses those doubts within the demanding framework of preparing patients for complex surgical interventions.

The study, known as the VIDEOGO trial, enrolled 112 patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery at two leading Dutch hospitals: Amsterdam UMC and Catharina Hospital. Participants were randomized into two groups—one receiving preoperative consultations online via video, and the other undergoing conventional face-to-face visits at surgical outpatient clinics. Researchers employed rigorous assessments to evaluate whether patients absorbed the same amount of information, perceived similar levels of support, and experienced comparable satisfaction regardless of the consultation mode.

Results showed unequivocally that video consultations were non-inferior to physical meetings across all measured parameters. Patients demonstrated equal comprehension of surgical details, confidence in their healthcare provider, and engagement in treatment planning. Surgeons reciprocated this satisfaction, reporting seamless communication and no significant challenges in discussing complex diagnostic imagery or surgical plans through video interfaces. Notably, the use of video communication enabled patients to review information in the comfort of their own homes, often with family members present, which enhanced their understanding and emotional readiness.

In addition to clinical equivalence, the trial highlights several key practical and societal benefits of video consultations. On average, patients saved approximately two hours per appointment, accounting for travel and waiting times, which translates into significant convenience, reduced stress, and increased availability of healthcare professionals. Financially, patients avoided expenses related to transportation and hospital parking, factors often overlooked but impactful especially for those coming from remote or underserved areas.

Beyond convenience and cost, the ecological footprint of virtual consultations is striking. The study quantified CO₂ emissions associated with hospital visits, finding that video consultations generate 99 percent less carbon dioxide—a remarkable reduction considering healthcare’s notable environmental impact. In the Netherlands, the medical sector accounts for roughly seven percent of total national CO₂ emissions; hence, widespread adoption of telemedicine could be a strategic lever in combating climate change while simultaneously maintaining care quality.

Social equity emerges as another pivotal benefit. Patients living far from medical centers or lacking adequate travel assistance frequently face logistical barriers to attendance, sometimes leading to delayed or missed appointments. Video consultations surmount these obstacles, enhancing accessibility for vulnerable populations and enabling more inclusive healthcare delivery. This dimension underscores telemedicine’s role not merely as a technological convenience but as a tool for expanding healthcare equity.

From the surgeon’s perspective, digital consultations do not appear to compromise clinical workflow. Leading surgeon Marc Besselink emphasized that reviewing diagnostic materials such as CT scans was feasible over video, and often more patient-friendly since family members could participate easily online. This dynamic supports informed consent processes and shared decision-making, foundational elements in contemporary surgical care.

Digital health expert Professor Marlies Schijven heralded the study’s findings as a “fantastic expansion of patient contact options,” advocating for active integration of video consultations into routine practice. She envisions a future where patients express their appointment preferences upfront, allowing healthcare providers to tailor encounters accordingly. This patient-centric approach promises to enhance satisfaction, optimize resource use, and shape a more resilient healthcare system capable of adapting to evolving demands.

The methodological rigor of the VIDEOGO trial strengthens the reliability of these conclusions. An open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled design allows definitive comparison between video and physical consultations without blinding patients or clinicians—an ethically necessary consideration given the nature of the intervention. Outcome measures incorporated both objective data, such as information retention, and subjective feedback from participants, ensuring a holistic evaluation of the consultation experience.

Funding from ZonMw’s Citrine programme towards Regional Oncology Networks further underscores the study’s relevance to oncology, a field characterized by complex, multidisciplinary care pathways where efficient communication is critical. By validating video consultations in the context of major abdominal surgeries, often involving oncological indications, the trial supports broader telehealth applications across surgical subspecialties and chronic disease management.

In conclusion, Amsterdam UMC’s VIDEOGO trial presents robust evidence that video consultations are poised to become a mainstay in preoperative surgical care. The equivalence in clinical outcomes paired with substantial advantages—convenience, cost savings, ecological benefits, and improved accessibility—marks a transformative moment in healthcare delivery. As digital infrastructure expands and familiarity with telemedicine grows, embracing virtual care models represents a crucial step towards sustainable, equitable, and patient-centered healthcare.

This landmark study not only dispels persistent doubts about remote consultations but also charts a clear path for integrating digital health into everyday clinical practice. The era of telemedicine, catalyzed by necessity and now fortified by evidence, holds promise to redefine how patients and surgeons connect, communicate, and collaborate in the pursuit of optimal surgical outcomes.

Subject of Research: People
Article Title: Online video versus face-to-face preoperative consultation for major abdominal surgery (VIDEOGO): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial
News Publication Date: 15-Jun-2025

Telerehabilitation leverages communication technologies to deliver rehabilitation services remotely, circumventing traditional geographic and logistic barriers inherent in in-person therapies. This modality has garnered attention not only for sustaining continuity of care during global crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic but also for its prospective advantages in cost reduction, patient engagement, and scalability. The renewed urgency and interest catalyzed by recent events have underscored the imperative to systematically evaluate telerehabilitation’s outcomes, optimize implementation strategies, and address emerging challenges.

Central to the theme issue outlined by editor-in-chief Dr. Sarah Munce is a focus on comparative outcomes research that scrutinizes the clinical effectiveness and safety profile of telerehabilitation vis-à-vis conventional face-to-face rehabilitation models. This includes meticulous reporting of adverse events, adherence rates, and patient satisfaction metrics, which are essential to validate telerehabilitation as an evidence-based practice. Such investigations aim to delineate the scenarios and cohorts where remote interventions are equally or more efficacious, thereby guiding tailored clinical decision-making.

Alongside outcome-based inquiries, there is a pressing need to unravel the complex web of logistical and organizational factors that influence the adoption and sustainability of telerehabilitation services. Post-pandemic healthcare landscapes have catalyzed widespread telehealth deployment, yet questions remain regarding how healthcare institutions can maintain these services long-term. Understanding clinician perspectives, identifying systemic barriers such as resource allocation and training deficits, and elucidating facilitators like workflow integration are critical to embedding telerehabilitation as a standard care component.

Health equity stands as a paramount consideration in the telerehabilitation discourse. Access disparities propelled by digital literacy gaps, limited technological infrastructure, and socioeconomic barriers can inadvertently widen health inequities if not proactively addressed. The journal seeks research that innovatively tackles these disparities, enhancing accessibility for marginalized and equity-seeking populations through adaptable technology interfaces, culturally sensitive program designs, and community engagement frameworks. Such investigations can inform policy and practice to ensure the inclusivity of telerehabilitation innovations.

Technological innovation remains at the frontier of telerehabilitation’s promise. Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms offers prospects for personalized rehabilitation regimens that dynamically adapt to patient progress and predictive analytics. Wearable devices and sensor technologies provide real-time biometric feedback, enabling continuous monitoring and remote adjustments that enhance therapeutic precision. Interprofessional collaboration across disciplines further accelerates the development of holistic, patient-centered approaches that capitalize on these advancements.

Despite the broad strides in adult populations, pediatric telerehabilitation is conspicuously underexplored. Children with disabilities often require specialized, nuanced interventions that account for developmental variability and family-centered care paradigms. The call for papers highlights a critical knowledge gap and encourages research that develops, implements, and evaluates telehealth modalities tailored specifically to pediatric rehabilitation, thereby expanding the scope and impact of telerehabilitation services.

JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies promises a rigorous peer-review process ensuring that submissions embody methodological rigor and clinical relevance. The forthcoming theme issue aims not only to disseminate robust scientific evidence but also to foster discourse around best practices, innovation pathways, and policy frameworks. This initiative reinforces the journal’s stature in digital health publishing and its commitment to propelling telerehabilitation research to new frontiers.

Researchers aspiring to contribute must submit manuscripts by October 31, 2025, thereby aligning with the journal’s meticulous editorial calendar. This deadline enables coordinated peer review and timely publication to maximize impact within the global scientific and clinical communities. Accepted studies will be freely accessible, supporting the open science movement and accelerating knowledge transfer among practitioners, policymakers, and patients alike.

Beyond its editorial scope, JMIR Publications embodies a technological ethos that transcends traditional scholarly dissemination. By providing innovative publishing tools and amplifying digital health research, the organization enhances researcher visibility and engagement. The publisher’s portfolio, which includes the flagship Journal of Medical Internet Research, underscores its leadership in harnessing digital platforms to shape the future of health sciences.

Ultimately, this call for submissions symbolizes an inflection point in telerehabilitation research, encouraging multidisciplinary collaboration and pioneering investigations that address efficacy, implementation science, technological innovation, and equitable access. It invites the global rehabilitation community to contribute knowledge that will sculpt the contours of remote therapeutic care in the years ahead, fostering a healthcare ecosystem that is more resilient, inclusive, and technologically empowered.

For further information on submission guidelines and the thematic scope, interested parties can visit the official website of JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies.

Subject of Research: Telerehabilitation, Implementation Science, Health Equity, Technological Innovation in Rehabilitation

Article Title: The Importance of Telerehabilitation and Future Directions for the Field

News Publication Date: May 1, 2025

Web References:

• JMIR Publications: https://www.jmir.org/
• JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies: https://rehab.jmir.org/
• Editorial: https://rehab.jmir.org/2025/1/e76153/
• Call for papers: https://rehab.jmir.org/announcements/558

Image Credits: JMIR Publications and Visual Generation

Keywords: Physical therapy, Rehabilitation centers, Personalized medicine, Sports medicine, Pediatrics, Personal protective equipment, Prosthetic limbs, Physical rehabilitation