<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hard winter wheat &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/hard-winter-wheat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 18:06:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Scientists uncover hidden susceptibility genes fueling wheat disease outbreaks</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/scientists-uncover-hidden-susceptibility-genes-fueling-wheat-disease-outbreaks/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 18:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal susceptibility in wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic basis of wheat leaf and glume blotch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic markers for wheat disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome-wide association study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Plains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard winter wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of farming practices on wheat diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KASP markers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marker-assisted selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[necrotrophic effectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[necrotrophic fungi in wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parastagonospora nodorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[septoria nodorum blotch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[septoria nodorum blotch genetic resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snn3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tsn1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat breeding for disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat breeding strategies for fungal resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat crop vulnerability genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat disease genetic mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat disease outbreak prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat susceptibility genes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=207471</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A large-scale genetic study of 619 US hard winter wheat lines has identified known and novel susceptibility genes for septoria nodorum blotch and delivered new molecular markers to guide resistance breeding.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most damaging fungal diseases of wheat is quietly exploiting the crop&#8217;s own genes, and a sweeping new study has now mapped exactly where that vulnerability lies. Researchers evaluating 619 elite hard winter wheat breeding lines and cultivars from the United States Great Plains have identified both well-characterized and previously unknown genes that make modern wheat susceptible to septoria nodorum blotch, a disease caused by the necrotrophic fungus Parastagonospora nodorum. The findings, published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, offer wheat breeders a detailed genetic roadmap for building resistance into one of America&#8217;s most important market classes of wheat.</p>
<p>Septoria nodorum blotch has grown into an economically significant problem over recent decades across the eastern United States, northern Europe, Australia, and parts of North Asia. The fungus attacks both leaves, producing leaf blotch, and spikes, causing glume blotch, and can slash yields by as much as 50 percent on susceptible cultivars. In the Great Plains, where hard winter wheat dominates production, the disease has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. Farming practices such as minimum or no-till agriculture, which leave more infected crop residue on the soil surface, may have contributed to the surge. Compounding the problem, isolates of the fungus collected from hard winter wheat in Oklahoma show unusually high genetic and virulence diversity, suggesting local pathogen populations have adapted to the region&#8217;s cultivars.</p>
<p>The central puzzle of the wheat-P. nodorum system lies in its inverted genetics. Unlike classic disease resistance, where a plant gene recognizes a pathogen molecule and triggers defense, susceptibility here follows an inverse gene-for-gene model. The fungus produces proteinaceous molecules called necrotrophic effectors, and when a corresponding sensitivity gene in the wheat host recognizes one of these effectors, it triggers programmed cell death. That cell death, paradoxically, feeds the necrotrophic fungus, which thrives on dead tissue. To date, researchers have cloned seven wheat sensitivity genes, including Tsn1-B1, Snn1-B1, Snn2, Snn3-B1, Snn3-B2, Snn3-D1, and Snn5-B1, along with five fungal effector genes named SnToxA, SnTox1, SnTox3, SnTox5, and SnTox267. Thirteen distinct sensitivity gene-effector interactions have been documented in this pathosystem.</p>
<p>To determine how widespread these susceptibility genes are in contemporary hard winter wheat, the research team, led by scientists at Oklahoma State University in collaboration with the USDA Agricultural Research Service and Kansas State University, assembled a panel of 619 genotypes. The panel included 532 doubled-haploid breeding lines derived from 14 bi-parental crosses, 38 elite breeding lines from the Oklahoma State University program, and 49 cultivars from the Oklahoma State and Kansas State breeding programs. Each genotype was tested at the seedling stage against five P. nodorum isolates originally collected from the winter wheat cultivar Gallagher in Canadian County, Oklahoma in 2016, and against purified preparations of the five known necrotrophic effectors.</p>
<p>The results revealed a sobering picture of genetic vulnerability. When inoculated with the fungal isolates, between 40 and 67 percent of the genotypes proved susceptible, depending on the isolate, while resistant genotypes ranged from only 5 to 21 percent. Effector infiltration assays, in which purified effector proteins were injected directly into leaves using a needleless syringe, showed that 54 percent of genotypes were sensitive to SnToxA, 37 percent to SnTox3, 15 percent to SnTox5, 13 percent to SnTox267, and just 2 percent to SnTox1. These frequencies indicate that Tsn1-B1 and Snn3-B1/B2 are the most common sensitivity genes in this germplasm, while functional Snn1-B1 is rare. Notably, 75 genotypes showed resistant to intermediate reactions against all five isolates, including the Oklahoma cultivars Uncharted, Bentley, Big Country, and OK Corral.</p>
<p>The team genotyped the entire panel using genotyping-by-sequencing, which yielded 34,357 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphism markers after filtering, along with diagnostic kompetitive allele-specific PCR, or KASP, markers for the sensitivity genes Tsn1-B1, Snn1-B1, and Snn3-B1/B2. The diagnostic markers performed remarkably well for some genes: the Tsn1-B1 markers achieved 98 percent prediction accuracy against SnToxA sensitivity, and the Snn3-B1/B2 markers reached 92 percent accuracy against SnTox3. The Snn1-B1 marker, by contrast, showed only 75 percent accuracy, with a 25 percent false positive rate, suggesting that structural variations such as mutations, deletions, or inversions may have disabled the gene in many lines without being detectable by the current marker.</p>
<p>Genome-wide association studies using three statistical models, the mixed linear model, FarmCPU, and BLINK, confirmed the presence of the known sensitivity genes Tsn1-B1 on chromosome 5BL, Snn1-B1 on 1BS, Snn3-B1/B2 on 5BS, Snn2 on 2DS, and Snn5-B1 on 4BL, each associated with responses to its corresponding effector. But the analysis went further, uncovering numerous novel loci scattered across the wheat genome that had never before been linked to septoria nodorum blotch responses. In total, the BLINK model identified 23 significant loci associated with responses to the fungal isolates and 49 loci associated with effector responses, positioned on chromosome arms including 1AS, 1AL, 1BL, 1DS, 2AL, 2BL, 3AS, 3AL, 3BS, 3BL, 4AL, 4BL, 5AS, 5AL, 6AL, 6BS, 6BL, 7BS, 7BL, and 7DL.</p>
<p>The most striking discovery was a locus on chromosome arm 2AS, designated Qsnb.osu-2AS, which was associated with responses to all five P. nodorum isolates tested. For three of the isolates, the effect of this locus on disease response actually exceeded that of the Tsn1 gene. The significant markers in this region spanned a physical interval of roughly 17.69 megabases containing 268 high-confidence genes, several of which are annotated as involved in disease resistance and defense-related pathways. Encouragingly, the resistant allele of Qsnb.osu-2AS was already present at frequencies of roughly 45 to 60 percent in the germplasm, and the region shows some overlap with a previously reported resistance quantitative trait locus, Qsnb.cur-2AS2, mapped in an earlier study.</p>
<p>Translating these discoveries into practical breeding tools, the researchers developed new KASP markers linked to Snn5-B1, Snn2, and Qsnb.osu-2AS, sensitivity and resistance loci that previously lacked diagnostic markers. The marker KASP_S4B_643615365, targeting the Snn5-B1 region on chromosome 4BL, achieved 89 percent accuracy in predicting SnTox5 sensitivity across the full panel, while KASP_S2D_16184991, linked to Snn2 on chromosome 2DS, reached 80 percent accuracy for SnTox267 sensitivity. Two additional markers, KASP_S2A_9833162 and KASP_S2A_14367498, were validated for selecting the resistant allele at Qsnb.osu-2AS. Together with the existing diagnostic markers for Tsn1-B1 and Snn3-B1/B2, these tools give breeders the ability to deliberately eliminate susceptibility genes and stack resistance alleles through marker-assisted selection.</p>
<p>The study also revealed evidence of fungal weapons not yet characterized. Several cultivars, including Green Hammer, currently the second most grown wheat variety in Oklahoma, were insensitive to all five known effectors and lacked the corresponding sensitivity genes, yet remained susceptible to particular isolates. This pattern strongly suggests that P. nodorum harbors additional, undiscovered effectors and that wheat carries uncharacterized sensitivity genes targeted by them. The researchers also noted intriguing epistatic effects among effectors, consistent with earlier findings that SnTox1 expression can be suppressed in the presence of SnToxA, which may explain why the Snn1 locus showed no association with responses to the whole isolates even though it responds to purified SnTox1. Because Tsn1 also confers susceptibility to tan spot and spot blotch, two other major fungal diseases, the authors argue that eliminating Tsn1-B1 and Snn3-B1/B2, which are present at high frequencies in contemporary hard winter wheat, should be the top priority for breeding programs. The study focused on seedling-stage responses, and the team emphasizes that future work will need to identify loci governing adult plant resistance under field conditions, where genotype-by-environment interactions and quantitatively inherited resistance play a larger role.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Identification of known and novel septoria nodorum blotch susceptibility and resistance genes in US hard winter wheat using effector assays, diagnostic markers, and genome-wide association studies.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Identification of septoria nodorum blotch susceptibility genes in hard winter wheat</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ara, A. M., Holmes, D. J., Friesen, T. L., Carver, B. F., Bai, G., Amand, P. S., Bernado, A., Sharma, R., &amp; Aoun, M. (2026). Identification of septoria nodorum blotch susceptibility genes in hard winter wheat. <em>Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 139</em>(10), Article 268. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05359-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05359-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05359-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00122-026-05359-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> septoria nodorum blotch, hard winter wheat, Parastagonospora nodorum, necrotrophic effectors, Tsn1, Snn3, genome-wide association study, KASP markers, marker-assisted selection, wheat breeding, disease resistance, Great Plains</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">207471</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden Genes That Shield Wheat From Bacterial Leaf Streak Revealed by Massive Genetic Scan</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hidden-genes-that-shield-wheat-from-bacterial-leaf-streak-revealed-by-massive-genetic-scan/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural genomics in wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial leaf streak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elite hard winter wheat genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic basis of wheat pathogen resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic mapping of wheat resistance traits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome-wide association study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome-wide association study in wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Plains agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hard winter wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marker-assisted breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular markers for wheat resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRASeq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant genomics for disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QTL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNP markers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Triticum aestivum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wheat bacterial leaf streak resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat breeding for bacterial leaf streak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat disease management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat disease resistance genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xanthomonas translucens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosa]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=195507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A genome-wide association study of 412 elite hard winter wheat lines has identified seven genomic loci, including four major QTLs, linked to resistance against bacterial leaf streak disease.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quiet bacterial threat is creeping across the wheat fields of the American Northern Great Plains, and plant scientists have been racing to understand why some wheat lines shrug it off while others surrender. Bacterial leaf streak, caused by the pathogen Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosa, has become one of the most consequential diseases of wheat in the region, capable of slashing yields by as much as sixty percent in susceptible varieties during severe epidemics. Unlike rust or fusarium head blight, which have well-mapped resistance genes and established breeding pipelines, bacterial leaf streak has long been a genetic blind spot. Resistance in wheat remained poorly characterized, and only a handful of resistant germplasm lines had ever been identified. A new genome-wide association study published in BMC Genomics now changes that picture dramatically, pinpointing the chromosomal neighborhoods that confer resistance in elite hard winter wheat and handing breeders a molecular toolkit they have never had before.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Muhammad Ahmad and Gazala Ameen of South Dakota State University, together with colleagues from the USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Oklahoma State University, and the University of Florida, assembled an unusually valuable panel of plant material: 412 elite hard winter wheat lines drawn from the Regional Germplasm Observation Nursery. These are not wild relatives or landraces but contemporary breeding lines already adapted to the environments where the disease hits hardest. That distinction matters enormously for translation. Any resistance gene found in elite adapted material can be moved directly into commercial cultivars without the yield drag or linkage burden that often accompanies resistance introgressed from exotic germplasm.</p>
<p>To measure disease response, the researchers phenotyped every line under controlled greenhouse conditions using a standardized one-to-nine severity scale. The results revealed a broad but sobering spectrum of susceptibility. Most accessions clustered in the moderately susceptible middle of the distribution, with scores ranging from three to seven and a mean of 5.5, underscoring how widespread vulnerability to Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosa is within the elite hard winter wheat gene pool. Yet hidden within that sea of susceptibility were thirty-two lines that scored below three, qualifying as resistant. These thirty-two lines represent some of the most immediately useful breeding material ever assembled for this disease, because they combine resistance with the agronomic quality that regional growers already demand.</p>
<p>Genotyping at this scale demanded a high-throughput approach, and the team turned to Multiplex Restriction Amplicon Sequencing, or MRASeq, a genotyping method that captures dense single-nucleotide polymorphism data at relatively low cost. After rigorous quality filtering, the platform yielded 15,368 high-quality SNPs spread across the wheat genome, a resolution sufficient to detect even modest association signals. Before any association testing, the researchers characterized the population structure of the panel, an essential step in wheat genetics because unmodeled relatedness can create spurious associations. The analyses revealed five genetically distinct subpopulations within the nursery panel, reflecting the breeding histories and programs that contributed material to the regional network.</p>
<p>With structure accounted for, the team ran genome-wide association analyses using two complementary statistical models, BLINK and FarmCPU. Both are designed to control for population stratification and kinship while retaining power to detect true marker-trait associations, and their agreement strengthens confidence in the findings. Together, the models identified seven significant marker-trait associations located on chromosomes 1B, 2B, 3B, 3D, 4A, 4B, and 6B. Individually, these loci explained between 0.04 and 16.6 percent of the phenotypic variance in disease severity. Four of the seven surpassed the conventional threshold for major quantitative trait loci, each accounting for more than ten percent of the variance, a substantial effect size in a quantitative disease-resistance trait.</p>
<p>The chromosome 3B locus emerged as a particularly important finding because of its strong co-occurrence with resistance regions reported in previous studies of bacterial leaf streak. This convergence across independent germplasm and mapping populations suggests that 3B harbors a genuine, reproducible resistance factor rather than a panel-specific artifact. It also offers breeders a validation point: marker assays developed around the 3B region should be robust across diverse wheat backgrounds. The remaining loci on chromosomes 2B, 4A, 4B, 1B, 6B, and 3D appear to be putatively novel regions for bacterial leaf streak resistance, never before reported in wheat. Novel loci expand the genetic repertoire available to breeders and open new avenues for cloning the underlying genes and dissecting the defense mechanisms they encode.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most immediately actionable result concerns the thirty-two resistant lines and their allelic architecture. Among them, seventeen highly resistant genotypes consistently carried the favorable alleles across the four major loci on chromosomes 3B, 4A, 4B, and 6B. This pattern of allele stacking provides a textbook illustration of quantitative resistance in action: no single locus fully protects the plant, but pyramiding several moderate-to-large effect alleles produces a level of resistance dramatically higher than any individual contribution. For breeding programs, that insight translates into a concrete strategy. Rather than chasing a single magic gene, marker-assisted selection can track four regions simultaneously, combining them in elite backgrounds through several generations of crossing and selection.</p>
<p>The practical implications ripple outward from the breeding plot to the grain elevator. Bacterial leaf streak has been expanding its footprint across the Northern Great Plains, aided by seed transmission, contaminated residue, and weather patterns that favor bacterial spread during critical growth stages. Because the pathogen is bacterial rather than fungal, conventional fungicides offer no control, and chemical management options remain essentially nonexistent. Host resistance is therefore the only sustainable, economically viable management strategy, and until now breeders lacked both the resistant donors and the molecular markers to deploy it efficiently. The new study supplies both, in adapted germplasm that can enter crossing blocks without lengthy pre-breeding.</p>
<p>From a scientific standpoint, the work also clarifies the genetic architecture of resistance to this understudied disease. The distribution of effects, with a few major loci and several minor contributors, mirrors patterns seen in other quantitative disease resistances in wheat and suggests that durable field-level control will come from combining these validated regions with any additional loci that future, larger panels may uncover. The seven significant markers themselves become tools for basic research: fine mapping around chromosomes 3B, 4A, 4B, and 6B could eventually identify candidate genes, potentially revealing novel immune receptors or defense regulators active against Xanthomonas, a genus against which wheat has few characterized defenses.</p>
<p>The team, which in addition to Ahmad and Ameen includes Jeffrey D. Boehm Jr., Paul St. Amand, Amy Bernardo, Katherine Jordan, Guihua Bai, Meriem Aoun, Hamza Ashfaq, Karl D. Glover, and Shyam Solanki, emphasizes that the resistant germplasm and SNP markers reported here will serve as valuable resources for marker-assisted breeding aimed at accelerating the development of bacterial leaf streak-resistant winter wheat cultivars. The work was supported by Agricultural Experiment Station funding, the South Dakota Wheat Commission, and the USDA-ARS Wheat CRIS project, reflecting a partnership between federal science agencies and grower-funded commodity groups. For wheat farmers watching bacterial lesions spread across their fields in wet growing seasons, the study offers something tangible: a genetic map of protection, and thirty-two elite lines already carrying it, ready to anchor the next generation of resistant varieties across the Great Plains.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Genome-wide association mapping of resistance to bacterial leaf streak disease in elite hard winter wheat</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Genome-wide association mapping of major QTLs for resistance to bacterial leaf-streak disease (Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosa) in elite hard winter wheat germplasm</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ahmad, M., Boehm, J. D., Jr., Amand, P. S., Bernardo, A., Jordan, K., Bai, G., Aoun, M., Ashfaq, H., Glover, K. D., Solanki, S., &amp; Ameen, G. (2026). Genome-wide association mapping of major QTLs for resistance to bacterial leaf-streak disease (Xanthomonas translucens pv. undulosa) in elite hard winter wheat germplasm. <em>BMC Genomics</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13325-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13325-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13325-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s12864-026-13325-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> bacterial leaf streak, wheat, Xanthomonas translucens, genome-wide association study, QTL, hard winter wheat, plant disease resistance, marker-assisted breeding, SNP markers, Great Plains agriculture, Triticum aestivum, MRASeq</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">195507</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
