<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>grapevine phosphorus deficiency response &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/grapevine-phosphorus-deficiency-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 02:16:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Grape Cultivars Reveal Distinct Responses to Phosphorus Deficiency and Excess</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/grape-cultivars-reveal-distinct-responses-to-phosphorus-deficiency-and-excess/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2026 02:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthocyanins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antioxidant enzymes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultivar comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultivar-specific adaptation to nutrient deficiencies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of phosphorus on grapevine vegetative growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grape cultivar nutrient uptake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grapevine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grapevine macronutrient dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grapevine phosphorus deficiency response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of phosphorus excess on grapevines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micronutrients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient partitioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient profiling of grapevine tissues under phosphorus imbalance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxidative stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus deficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus management in grape cultivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phosphorus toxicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physiological effects of phosphorus toxicity in grapevines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root-shoot biomass allocation in grapevines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root-to-shoot ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stress responses in grapevine root systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tissue-specific nutrient partitioning in grapevines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vitis vinifera]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=349288</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A controlled study of 'Khalili' and 'Perlette' grapevines shows that moderate phosphorus supply optimizes growth while deficiency and excess trigger distinct mineral imbalances, oxidative stress and cultivar-specific biochemical responses.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phosphorus is a vital macronutrient for grapevine, but the mechanisms that allow cultivars to cope with both too little and too much of it have remained poorly defined. Seedlings were grown under 0 mM phosphorus (deficiency), 2.5 mM (sufficiency) and 5 mM (excess or toxicity). Vegetative performance peaked at the intermediate level.</p>
<p>Stem length, stem diameter, lateral shoot number and shoot dry weight all reached their highest values under 2.5 mM phosphorus, while both severe deficiency and excess significantly impaired shoot development, indicating that the physiological optimum for grapevine vegetative growth sits at the moderate supply rather than at the high end. Root behavior told a different story. Root dry weight remained comparable between the 2.5 mM and 5 mM treatments, so plants receiving excess phosphorus showed a higher root-to-shoot ratio.</p>
<p>This shift suggests that when shoots are suppressed by phosphorus toxicity, the root system retains relatively more of the plant&#x27;s biomass, a pattern consistent with stress-driven allocation changes rather than stimulated root growth. Nutrient profiling revealed pronounced tissue-specific partitioning. Increasing phosphorus supply promoted accumulation of phosphorus and nitrogen in leaves while altering the root macronutrient status of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium.</p>
<p>In roots, elevated phosphorus suppressed the accumulation of iron, manganese and copper while enhancing zinc uptake. The divergent behavior of zinc, which increased in roots but decreased in leaves, highlights how phosphorus levels can reshape micronutrient distribution between organs rather than simply limiting overall uptake. Both extremes of supply triggered oxidative stress.</p>
<p>Activities of the antioxidant enzymes catalase, guaiacol peroxidase and ascorbate peroxidase were up-regulated in leaves and roots under deficiency and excess alike, showing that phosphorus imbalance imposes oxidative pressure that the plants counter with heightened enzymatic defense. Cultivar-specific responses were prominent. Under deficiency, &#x27;Khalili&#x27; accumulated substantial anthocyanins and showed higher leaf starch content, suggesting a distinctive metabolic strategy for coping with phosphorus starvation. &#x27;Perlette&#x27;, by contrast, maintained more stable ionic homeostasis under excess phosphorus, indicating greater tolerance of toxicity at the mineral balance level.</p>
<p>The authors conclude that 2.5 mM phosphorus represents the physiological optimum for grapevine vegetative development, while both extreme deficiency and excess impair growth through distinct mineral imbalances and oxidative stress cascades.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Morphophysiological and biochemical responses of two grape cultivars to varying phosphorus supply levels</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Morphophysiological and biochemical responses of two grape cultivars to phosphorus deficiency and toxicity</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Behrooz, M. Z., Karimi, R., Khadivi, A., Tunç, Y., &amp; Yadav, L. P. (2026). Morphophysiological and biochemical responses of two grape cultivars to phosphorus deficiency and toxicity. <em>PLOS One, 21</em>(10), e0361111. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361111" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361111</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361111" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1371/journal.pone.0361111</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> grapevine, phosphorus deficiency, phosphorus toxicity, antioxidant enzymes, nutrient partitioning, oxidative stress, anthocyanins, root-to-shoot ratio, Vitis vinifera, plant nutrition, micronutrients, cultivar comparison</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">349288</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
