<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gold Coast &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/gold-coast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 16:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Hidden Fungus Emerges as a Suspect in the Decline of Coastal Norfolk Island Pines</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hidden-fungus-emerges-as-a-suspect-in-the-decline-of-coastal-norfolk-island-pines/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Howard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 16:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Araucaria heterophylla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botryosphaeriaceae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fungal endophytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch's postulates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neofusicoccum luteum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Island pine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant pathology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban tree decline]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=217246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A fungus never before recorded on Norfolk Island pines has been isolated from declining Gold Coast trees and shown in glasshouse trials to infect saplings and slow their growth, positioning drought stress and latent Botryosphaeriaceae pathogens as joint drivers of an iconic urban tree's decline.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along the foreshores of Australia&#8217;s Gold Coast, the towering Norfolk Island pines that have defined the skyline for generations are quietly dying. The trees, Araucaria heterophylla, are showing canopy dieback, browning foliage tips, progressive defoliation, and shortened branchlets, and for decades the causes remained murky. A new study published in Environmental Management by Anna Petrova of Griffith University and colleagues now adds a crucial piece to the puzzle: a fungus called Neofusicoccum luteum, never before documented on this species, is present in a quarter of the declining trees sampled and is capable of infecting healthy saplings under controlled conditions. The finding does not convict the fungus outright, but it firmly places an opportunistic pathogen on the list of suspects behind one of Australia&#8217;s most visible urban tree declines.</p>
<p>The Norfolk Island pine is an unlikely victim. Introduced from Norfolk Island to mainland Australia in the late eighteenth century, the species possesses physiological traits that should make it well suited to coastal life. It is isohydric, meaning it regulates its leaf water potential to stay within safe limits regardless of soil moisture, and it shows halophytic properties that allow it to tolerate salt in the root zone. Yet mature trees in New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, and Western Australia have long exhibited decline symptoms, and many are now recognized as heritage and cultural icons whose loss would reshape entire coastal streetscapes. Previous work has pointed to abiotic stressors, including elevated sodium levels linked to surfactant exposure, soil compaction, proximity to urban infrastructure, and extreme weather events, while biotic suspects have included fungi from the genera Lasiodiplodia and Neofusicoccum.</p>
<p>To identify which fungi actually inhabit declining trees, the researchers sampled thirty-two mature A. heterophylla of varying health along the Gold Coast foreshore. From each tree they collected three roughly one-centimeter branchlet segments with leaves, surface-sterilized the tissue in 1.5 percent sodium hypochlorite for two minutes, triple-rinsed it in sterile water, and cultured it on Potato Dextrose Agar at 25 degrees Celsius for two to three weeks. The team then extracted high-molecular-weight DNA from the resulting isolates using a modified CTAB protocol, grinding mycelium under liquid nitrogen and purifying the genetic material through a series of precipitation and ethanol-wash steps. DNA integrity, purity, and quantity were verified by gel electrophoresis, Nanodrop, and Qubit before sequencing.</p>
<p>The sequencing strategy itself reflects a shift in how plant pathology is done. Rather than relying solely on traditional Sanger sequencing, the team used Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing on an Mk1C device, reasoning that rapid genus-level identification could eventually support field diagnostics. Basecalled reads were taxonomically classified with Kraken2 against the full NCBI nucleotide database, with stringent confidence and base-quality thresholds, and matches of interest were confirmed by reciprocal BLASTn. Ambiguous or particularly interesting isolates were sent to Grow Help Australia, the Queensland Government&#8217;s plant pest diagnostic service, for species-level confirmation via PCR and dual-direction Sanger sequencing. In total, sixteen fungal species from ten genera were recovered, and three genera contained known pathogens: Nigrospora, Alternaria, and Neofusicoccum.</p>
<p>One species stood out. Neofusicoccum luteum, isolated from eight of the thirty-two trees, or 25 percent, had never previously been reported on A. heterophylla, even though a comprehensive 2022 review of Araucariaceae pathogens catalogued many of its Botryosphaeriaceae relatives. Elsewhere, N. luteum has a rap sheet: it causes dieback on rhododendrons in Spain, canker on English oak in Portugal, fruit rot and leaf necrosis on olives in Australia, disease on tejocote in the United States, and infection in Pinot noir grapevines in New Zealand. Members of the Botryosphaeriaceae are classic latent pathogens, living quietly inside woody hosts as endophytes and switching to aggressive disease when trees are stressed by drought, heat, or physical damage. That lifestyle makes them especially dangerous in cities, where multiple stresses converge.</p>
<p>To test whether N. luteum actually causes disease, the researchers turned to Koch&#8217;s postulates, the century-and-a-half-old framework for establishing causation between a microbe and a malady. Forty healthy two-year-old pines from the City of Gold Coast nursery were divided into four groups in a Brisbane glasshouse during the Australian summer: pathogen-inoculated and watered, pathogen-inoculated and drought-stressed, sterile-agar controls watered, and sterile-agar controls drought-stressed. Each tree received three shallow two-centimeter stem wounds into which a three-by-three-millimeter mycelial plug was inserted under the bark, sealed with wet cotton and parafilm. After ten days of uniform watering, the drought groups were cut off from irrigation entirely, while the watered groups continued receiving 700 milliliters every second day. Glasshouse temperatures fluctuated between 18.6 and 34.2 degrees Celsius over the six-week experiment.</p>
<p>The results were striking but nuanced. Infection rates exceeded 90 percent in both inoculated groups, and lesions developed even in the sterile-agar controls, though these were significantly smaller. Lesion size was significantly greater in both watered and drought-stressed pathogen-inoculated trees than in controls, with Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted p-values at or below 0.003, although drought did not significantly change lesion size within the inoculated treatment. More tellingly, under regular watering, trees inoculated with the fungus were significantly shorter than watered controls, indicating that even sublethal infection slows growth, likely because lesions extending into xylem tissue impair water and nutrient transport. Re-isolation confirmed the pathogen in 75 percent of drought-stressed trees but only 25 percent of watered trees, meaning Koch&#8217;s postulates were only partially fulfilled, possibly because unidentified secondary invaders outcompeted N. luteum in some lesions.</p>
<p>The authors are careful about what this means. N. luteum appears to contribute to the decline of Norfolk Island pines, they conclude, but it is unlikely to be the sole causal agent and cannot kill a tree rapidly; no mortality occurred during the trial. Instead, the picture that emerges is of a latent endophyte flipping into pathogenic mode under stress. The Gold Coast endured punishing drought before the study, with 2019 receiving just 825.6 millimeters of rain, barely above the 1986 record low, and summer temperatures in 2019 and 2017 well above long-term means. Many trees were also crown-lifted, their lower branches pruned, ahead of the 2018 Commonwealth Games, creating wounds and potential infection pathways. Prolonged heat and drought, the researchers suggest, may have promoted the transition of latent infections into active disease rather than enabling new infections outright.</p>
<p>Management implications follow directly. The team recommends supplementary irrigation during prolonged drought to keep trees vigorous enough to resist pathogen entry through damaged bark, along with consistent tree health monitoring. Soil improvement to enhance water-holding capacity may help, and the routine necessity of crown lifting deserves reassessment given the wounds it creates. Treatment options remain limited: no universal control exists for Neofusicoccum species, and while grapevine research has shown promise for biocontrol agents such as Bacillus velezensis and Trichoderma species, and for fungicides including tebuconazole and pyraclostrobin, frequent application is impractical on tall heritage trees in public spaces. Prevention, the authors argue, offers tall trees a better chance of survival than cure, particularly since infections become progressively harder to control once established.</p>
<p>The study also opens several research frontiers. The pathogenic potential of the Nigrospora and Alternaria alternata isolates remains unknown, and co-infection experiments are needed to determine whether fungal combinations drive more severe decline. Intriguingly, two Trichoderma species, well-known biological control agents, were naturally isolated from six of the sampled trees, hinting at an in-built defense whose dynamics have yet to be explored. Sampling was restricted to lower branches for access reasons, leaving the upper canopy&#8217;s fungal communities uncharted. And as climate change intensifies heat waves and drought in cities worldwide, the lessons from the Gold Coast extend far beyond one species: protecting mature urban trees, and selecting drought-tolerant, pathogen-resistant stock, may determine whether the green canopies that cool streets, filter air, and anchor coastal identity survive the century ahead.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Pathogenicity of the fungus Neofusicoccum luteum in declining urban Norfolk Island pines (Araucaria heterophylla) on the Gold Coast, Australia</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Urban Tree Pathogens: The Impact of Neofusicoccum luteum on Araucaria heterophylla (Norfolk Island Pine)</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Petrova, A., Pratt, C., Bar, I., T Sambasivam, P., &amp; Michael, R. N. (2026). Urban Tree Pathogens: The Impact of Neofusicoccum luteum on Araucaria heterophylla (Norfolk Island Pine). <em>Environmental Management, 76</em>(10), Article 332. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-026-02633-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-026-02633-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-026-02633-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00267-026-02633-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Neofusicoccum luteum, Araucaria heterophylla, Norfolk Island pine, urban tree decline, Botryosphaeriaceae, plant pathology, Koch&#x27;s postulates, drought stress, Gold Coast, fungal endophytes, urban forestry, Environmental Management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">217246</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rising Seas Could Hit Australia With $855 Billion in Losses by 2100</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/rising-seas-could-hit-australia-with-855-billion-in-losses-by-2100/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell Cooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 02:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Athmospheric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptation challenges for Australian coastal communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian coastal land and farmland vulnerability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change impact on Australian infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate policy and emissions pathways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coastal adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coastal flooding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coastal flooding property damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic valuation of climate change in Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental asset loss due to rising seas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future climate scenario SSP2-4.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming temperature projections 2100]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPCC scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term climate risk assessment Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sea level rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea level rise Australia economic losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSP2-4.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storm surge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storm surge risks Australia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=200652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Australian-first research projects at least $855 billion in economic losses from sea level rise and storm surge by 2100, threatening nearly 270,000 properties.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rising sea levels and intensifying storm surges could inflict economic losses of at least 855 billion dollars across Australia by the end of the century, according to the first nationwide assessment of its kind for the country. The peer-reviewed study, published in the journal Scientific Reports, was conducted by researchers at the University of Melbourne and the Australian National University and quantifies, in dollar terms, what many coastal communities have long feared: that the encroaching ocean will become one of the most expensive consequences of a warming climate. Under a moderate emissions pathway consistent with a continuation of current climate policies, the researchers estimate that coastal flooding could affect almost 270,000 properties and two million hectares of land nationwide by 2100, sweeping in residential homes, farmland, critical infrastructure and irreplaceable environmental assets.</p>
<p>The modelling rests on a future scenario developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change known as SSP2-4.5. This intermediate scenario, combining moderate greenhouse gas emissions with a partial global policy response, points to roughly 2.7 degrees Celsius of average global warming above pre-industrial levels by 2100. That figure is broadly in line with where existing national pledges and policies are steering the planet, but it sits well above the 1.5 degree threshold that world leaders enshrined in the Paris Agreement as the aspirational safe limit for climate change. In other words, the study&#8217;s headline losses are not a worst-case projection; they are close to business as usual.</p>
<p>To translate rising water into rising bills, the research team followed a deliberately systematic approach. They first mapped the areas likely to be inundated by combining sea-level projections with estimates of storm surge and high-resolution elevation data across the Australian continent. Within those flood-exposed zones, they then identified every affected property and parcel of land, drawing on a wide range of data sources and empirical measures to estimate the value of homes, farms, roads, utilities, ecosystems and agricultural acreage. The result was a granular national picture of exposure that no previous Australian study had assembled at this scale.</p>
<p>The second stage of the analysis converted exposure into expected harm. Using statistical modelling, the researchers estimated how severely the assets inside the mapped flood zones could be damaged over time as sea levels climb and storm surges push further inland. The physical damages projected by the model were then translated into economic losses, yielding a nationwide damage function that captures the compounding interaction between higher seas, extreme coastal water levels and the value of what lies in the water&#8217;s path. The method is a computational simulation grounded in observed relationships, designed to give policymakers a defensible estimate of future costs rather than an abstract warning.</p>
<p>The geographic distribution of the projected losses is striking. Every state and the Northern Territory will bear significant economic costs, the study finds, ranging from 230.5 billion dollars in Western Australia down to 7.9 billion dollars in Tasmania. Queensland follows close behind Western Australia with projected losses of 214.5 billion dollars, then Victoria at 167 billion dollars, New South Wales at 151 billion dollars, South Australia at 49.2 billion dollars and the Northern Territory at 35.2 billion dollars. The pattern reflects the combination of long, low-lying coastlines, dense coastal development and the sheer value of the property and infrastructure concentrated along Australia&#8217;s populated edges.</p>
<p>Property counts tell a parallel story of exposure. Queensland has the greatest number of properties at risk, with 93,157 identified in the flood-exposed zones, followed by New South Wales with 71,210 and Western Australia with 51,366. Yet within these state-wide totals, a single urban hotspot stands out. The Gold Coast alone faces 84.4 billion dollars in projected economic losses, making it the most exposed urban area in the entire country. The finding will resonate with residents who watched Tropical Cyclone Alfred tear away stretches of beach in a single night, an event that cost the City of Gold Coast 35 million dollars in emergency beach repairs and left communities along the east coast still recovering.</p>
<p>Despite the enormous sums, the study&#8217;s authors stress that their estimate is conservative in several important respects. The modelling uses a middle-of-the-road emissions scenario, holds storm intensity constant rather than allowing it to intensify with warming, and excludes losses from coastal erosion altogether. Perhaps most significantly, the figures do not reflect the possibility of rapid collapse of the Greenland and West Antarctic ice sheets, which could add up to two metres of global sea level rise by the end of the century. If any of those factors worsen, the true bill for coastal Australia could climb far beyond the 855 billion dollar floor that the study establishes.</p>
<p>The human dimension behind the numbers is considerable. The majority of Australians live within 50 kilometres of the coastline, meaning sea level rise may physically affect a large share of the national population. Millions of hectares of land are at risk by 2100 on current projections, and the damages extend well beyond housing to essential infrastructure, ecosystem services and valuable agricultural land. Professor Tom Kompas of the University of Melbourne, who led the study and co-authored the Climate Council&#8217;s accompanying Rising Seas Rising Bills report, notes that because carbon emissions have remained too high, a certain amount of sea level rise is already locked into the system. Adaptation, he argues, is no longer optional; the least costly option available is to avoid building new development in the places where risks are known to be highest, while restoring coastlines and reforming construction practices to reduce future exposure. These are hard decisions, he acknowledges, but they are ones communities are already confronting.</p>
<p>Climate scientists involved with the accompanying report emphasise that the mechanics of the threat are deceptively simple. Storm surges do not need to become more frequent or more violent to cause escalating damage; they simply ride on higher baseline seas, pushing floodwaters deeper into neighbourhoods that once stayed dry. Adjunct Professor Andrew Watkins, a Climate Councillor and co-author of the report, warns that powerful storm surges are already putting coastal homes and infrastructure at greater risk, and that economic losses can skyrocket into hundreds of billions of dollars if action is delayed. He describes sea level rise as a slow-onset disaster, one that demands faster cuts to greenhouse gas pollution alongside serious preparation of vulnerable communities, and cautions that the rapid loss of ice sheets and glaciers could push oceans even higher than the study&#8217;s already sobering projections.</p>
<p>What makes the research a landmark for Australia is its completeness. Previous assessments have tended to examine individual regions, cities or asset classes, leaving policymakers without a coherent national figure to weigh against adaptation investments. By modelling every state and territory under a single consistent methodology and anchoring the results to an internationally recognised emissions scenario, the study provides a common baseline for planning debates about coastal development, insurance, infrastructure design and managed retreat. The 855 billion dollar figure is, in effect, a price tag on the coast as it exists today, and a measure of how much cheaper the future could be if emissions fall faster and the most dangerous development choices are avoided. As the century advances and the seas continue their measured climb, the study suggests that the costliest decisions will not be about whether to protect Australia&#8217;s coastline, but how quickly the nation accepts what the water is already telling it.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Nationwide economic impacts of sea level rise and storm surge from global warming in Australia</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Rising sea levels could cost Australians at least $855 billion by 2100</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Rising sea levels could cost Australians at least $855 billion by 2100. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1143324" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> sea level rise, storm surge, Australia, coastal flooding, economic losses, climate change, IPCC scenarios, SSP2-4.5, Gold Coast, Scientific Reports, coastal adaptation, property risk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">200652</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
