<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>genome-wide SNPs &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/genome-wide-snps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:49:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>DNA and morphology reveal a cryptic moth across Central Europe</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/dna-and-morphology-reveal-a-cryptic-moth-across-central-europe/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 09:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anatomical differences in moth genitalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barcoding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Central European geometrid moth distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptic moth species identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptic species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptic species discovery in European Lepidoptera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddRAD sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA barcoding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA barcoding in moth taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European fauna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genital morphology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome-wide genetic markers for species delimitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome-wide SNPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geometridae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat overlap of Perizoma species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications of DNA-based species identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lepidoptera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morphological and genetic differentiation in moths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moth taxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mountain habitat biodiversity and species boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perizoma barrassoi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species reclassification based on molecular data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use of reduced-representation genome sequencing in taxonomy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=317618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A study of more than 250 moth specimens used DNA barcoding, genome-wide markers and genital anatomy to establish Perizoma barrassoi as a distinct Central European species whose wider distribution and larval biology remain uncertain.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DNA barcoding, genome-wide genetic markers and anatomical comparisons have identified the geometrid moth Perizoma barrassoi well beyond its original Central Italian range, establishing the species as new to the Central European fauna. Populations previously included with the close relative Perizoma incultaria were reassigned to P. barrassoi in Austria, Germany, France and Italy. The two species can occur in the same mountain habitats, but the study found that they are distinguished by male genital anatomy, DNA sequences, seasonal timing and elevation. The investigation examined more than 250 specimens, including 46 dissections and 29 DNA barcodes, and used reduced-representation genome sequencing for an independent test of the species boundary.</p>
<p>P. barrassoi was described in 2006 from a single male collected at 2,530 metres in the Maiella Mountains of Abruzzo, Italy. That specimen became the holotype. A female originally associated with the species was subsequently found to be a misidentified and unusually small specimen of Colostygia aqueata. A male collected on Monte Terminillo in 2004, about 100 kilometres from the type locality, was barcoded in work reported in 2019 and showed 8.9% sequence divergence from P. incultaria. That isolated genetic result supported recognition of a separate Central Italian taxon but did not establish its wider distribution. The later study brought the type anatomy, mitochondrial barcodes, nuclear genomic data, adult morphology and ecological records together to reassess populations assigned to the P. incultaria–P. barrassoi complex.</p>
<p>Researchers combined external characters with dissections of male and female genitalia, observations of phenology and vertical distribution, and DNA evidence. They measured anatomy with a calibrated microscope eyepiece and examined prepared genitalia and abdomens. For barcoding, they extracted DNA from one or two legs of dried specimens and analyzed a 658-base-pair region of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I gene, or COI. Sequence divergences were calculated with the Kimura two-parameter model and analyzed using a neighbor-joining algorithm. High-throughput sequencing was also used for older museum material. In parallel, ddRAD sequencing generated genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, for maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis and population-clustering tests. The authors used these independent evidence streams together because the two moths have no constant and reliable external wing feature that permits separation in the field.</p>
<p>The mitochondrial results divided the tested specimens into two clearly separated groups. The Monte Terminillo specimen produced a 658-base-pair sequence assigned to BOLD bin ACJ5976. Six specimens from Austria, southwestern Bavaria and northern Italy shared that bin and were only 1.1% distant from the Central Italian sequence. Their nearest species was P. incultaria, represented in the comparison by 19 specimens from Germany, Austria and northern Italy in bin AAF5044, with a reported barcode distance of 8.5%. Two specimens attributed to P. incultaria from the vicinity of Gastein in Salzburg were also successfully sequenced using high-throughput methods and fell unambiguously into the P. incultaria bin. Thus, the barcode evidence separated the taxa while also connecting Alpine populations with the Central Italian reference material.</p>
<p>Male genital anatomy strongly supported the DNA assignments. The newly attributed Alpine and Pyrenean populations closely matched the Italian holotype of P. barrassoi. In this species, the valvae are comparatively narrow, with their dorsal and ventral margins approximately parallel, and the costa narrows toward a finely tapered apex. Its aedeagus bears five to nine small cornuti measuring approximately 0.1 to 0.25 millimetres, none expanded at the base. P. incultaria has a much broader valval costa that dilates toward its apex and terminates in a small, beak-shaped sclerotized process bearing a conspicuous tuft of setae. Its aedeagus has five to seven stouter cornuti, with the distalmost generally the largest, curved and dilated at the base. The diagnostic contrasts were assessed in 7 male P. barrassoi and 23 male P. incultaria dissections.</p>
<p>Female genitalia supplied additional but subtler distinctions. In the six P. barrassoi females examined, the apophyses are fine and tapered, while the elongated colliculum is almost parallel-sided for most of its length. Its reported length was 0.37–0.5 millimetres in most specimens, with one measuring 0.6 millimetres. The corpus bursae is small and often globular, and the scobinate signum is small and round, with weak lateral spinules measuring 0.10–0.17 millimetres in diameter. Female P. incultaria has a generally longer colliculum of 0.6–0.7 millimetres and a larger, more elongate and often triangular signum of 0.13–0.3 millimetres, accompanied by stout lateral spinules. The sexes therefore differed in several reproductive structures, although the strongest visible separation was in the male genitalia.</p>
<p>Genome-wide data independently recovered the same two lineages. The ddRAD workflow generated an average of 1.54 million reads per individual, of which 84.8% remained after stringent quality filtering. A de novo assembly recovered 1,042 putative orthologues shared by more than three samples, covering 193,994 base pairs in total. This dataset contained 1,678 SNPs, including 200 parsimony-informative sites. A reference assembly mapped against the genome of the distantly related moth Operophtera brumata yielded a smaller final dataset of 50 retained loci across more than three individuals. Maximum-likelihood trees constructed independently from the de novo and reference datasets produced congruent arrangements, with the P. incultaria and P. barrassoi lineages receiving 100% bootstrap support. Population-clustering analysis likewise identified two discrete genetic groups corresponding to the two species. Only one of the eight individuals tested carried the bacterial parasite Wolbachia.</p>
<p>The revision also addressed the uncertain name-bearing material of P. incultaria. Its original description was based on two males and one female from the Alps. Two collectors were mentioned, with Gastein in Salzburg associated with the material, but the type specimens were presumed destroyed and could not be traced in museums in London or Berlin. Because P. incultaria cannot be separated externally from P. barrassoi and both may occur around Gastein, the authors designated a neotype to preserve nomenclatural stability. The chosen male was collected at Bad Hofgastein, Schlossalm, at 2,000 metres on 6 August 1975. High-throughput sequencing recovered a 658-base-pair fragment that clustered unambiguously with P. incultaria, fixing the name to a documented, genetically identified individual.</p>
<p>Ecological and seasonal records suggest reasons why P. barrassoi may have escaped attention. It is a montane, univoltine species recorded from approximately 700 metres in Bavarian and Austrian valleys to 2,500 metres in the Maiella Mountains. Other sites span about 1,000–1,300 metres in the Bavarian and Austrian Alps, 1,500–2,100 metres in the French Alps and Pyrenees, 1,800 metres on Monte Terminillo and 2,450 metres on the Adamello. Its central Italian specimens were recorded in mid- and late July, and its Pyrenean and French Alpine flight period extends from early July to early August. Alpine records, however, range from mid-April to late May, with one eastern Tyrolean specimen from mid-June and northern Italian specimens from late June. Where the two species coexist, P. barrassoi generally flies earlier than P. incultaria, whose Alpine populations usually fly from early June to early August. The larval stages and host plants of P. barrassoi remain unknown, although its sister species feeds on Primulaceae in early larval stages and on Saxifragaceae later, and representatives of both plant families occur at P. barrassoi collection sites.</p>
<p>On the present evidence, P. barrassoi is confirmed in the central Apennines, the Pyrenees, the French Alps, the Adamello area of northern Italy, eastern and northern Tyrol in Austria, and southernmost Bavaria in Germany. These confirmed records consist of distinct subareas, and the authors considered incomplete recording a more likely explanation than a genuinely fragmented distribution. They predicted that additional populations could remain in the northern Apennines and the western Alps, including Switzerland, Piedmont and Valle d’Aosta, and noted that the species’ early flight period and close resemblance to P. incultaria could make it easy to overlook. That wider range remains a prediction rather than a documented finding. Within the studied material, however, the combined barcode, nuclear-genomic, anatomical and ecological evidence establishes P. barrassoi as a distinct species occurring alongside P. incultaria across previously unrecognized parts of Central and Western Europe.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Taxonomic identification and European distribution of the geometrid moth Perizoma barrassoi</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> DNA barcoding and genomics reveal Perizoma barrassoi Zahm, Cieslak &amp; Hausmann, 2006 as new for the fauna of Central Europe ( Lepidoptera , Geometridae , Larentiinae )</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hausmann, A., Huemer, P., Lee, K. M., &amp; Mutanen, M. (2021). DNA barcoding and genomics reveal Perizoma barrassoi Zahm, Cieslak &amp;amp; Hausmann, 2006 as new for the fauna of Central Europe (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Larentiinae). <em>Nota Lepidopterologica, 44</em>, 17-28. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.44.58871" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.44.58871</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3897/nl.44.58871" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3897/nl.44.58871</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Perizoma barrassoi, DNA barcoding, ddRAD sequencing, genome-wide SNPs, cryptic species, Geometridae, Lepidoptera, moth taxonomy, genital morphology, European fauna, barcoding, genomics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">317618</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>India&#8217;s Native Dogs Carry a Genetic Signature All Their Own, Landmark SNP Study Reveals</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/indias-native-dogs-carry-a-genetic-signature-all-their-own-landmark-snp-study-reveals/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 16:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canine genetic diversity in India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation of native Indian dog breeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddRAD-GBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dog genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaddi and Mudhol Hound genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gaddi dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic diversity of Indian dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome-wide sequencing in Indian canines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome-wide SNPs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomic analysis of indigenous dog breeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of geography on Indian dog DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian dog breed evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian native dog breeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous vs imported dog genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular characterization of Indian dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mudhol Hound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phylogeography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNP study on Indian dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tibetan Mastiff]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=228639</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A genome-wide SNP analysis of six dog breeds across four Indian states reveals that native breeds such as the Gaddi and Mudhol Hound harbor greater genetic diversity than exotic pedigree dogs, in the first molecular characterization of these indigenous lineages.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India&#8217;s homegrown dog breeds have long been celebrated by herders and hunters in the Himalayas and the Deccan, but their genetic story has remained largely unwritten. Now a team of Indian researchers has produced the first molecular-level characterization of two of the country&#8217;s most iconic native breeds, the Gaddi and the Mudhol Hound, and in doing so has mapped the genomic landscape of indigenous and exotic dogs across the subcontinent. Using a genome-wide sequencing approach, the scientists identified hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms, or SNPs, and used them to trace how geography and breeding history have shaped the DNA of dogs living in four Indian states. The findings, published in the journal Discover Biotechnology, suggest that India&#8217;s native canine populations harbor a level of genetic richness that may exceed that of the imported pedigree breeds popular in the country&#8217;s cities.</p>
<p>The study, led by Bhawanpreet Kaur and C. S. Mukhopadhyay of Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University in Ludhiana, together with H. M. Yathish of Karnataka Veterinary, Animal and Fisheries Sciences University, focused on six breeds: three indigenous ones, the Gaddi, the Tibetan Mastiff and the Mudhol Hound, and three exotic ones, the Labrador Retriever, the German Shepherd and the Pug. Fifty dogs were sampled from four states spanning northern and southern India: Punjab, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana and Karnataka. Peripheral blood samples were collected aseptically under ethical approval from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee, and genomic DNA was extracted using the classical phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol method before being quantified and quality-checked with spectrophotometry and gel electrophoresis.</p>
<p>The technical heart of the study is a method called double digest restriction-site associated DNA genotyping by sequencing, or ddRAD-GBS. In this technique, genomic DNA is cut with a pair of restriction enzymes, in this case SphI and MluI, derived from the bacteria Streptomyces phaeochromogenes and Micrococcus luteus. The resulting fragments, which represent a reproducible subset of the genome, are then sequenced on an Illumina platform using 150-base-pair paired-end reads. This reduced-representation strategy allows researchers to interrogate tens of thousands of genomic positions across many individuals at a fraction of the cost of whole-genome sequencing, making it a popular choice for population genetics in non-model organisms. The sequencing and genotyping work was carried out at AgriGenome Laboratories in Kerala and at the Animal Genomics Laboratory at GADVASU.</p>
<p>The raw sequencing output was subjected to rigorous quality control using the FASTQC tool, with the researchers examining per-base quality scores, sequence length distributions, GC content and duplication levels. The Q30 score, a measure of the proportion of bases sequenced with high confidence, ranged from 91.272 to 95.262 percent across samples, while GC content fell between 49.5 and 55 percent, close to the theoretical expectation for canine DNA. After filtering out low-quality genotypes, multi-nucleotide polymorphisms and likely paralogous variants, the team identified a staggering 356,461 SNP loci across the samples, of which 75,811 high-quality SNPs were retained for downstream population genetic analyses. The computational pipeline relied on R programming and Linux bash scripting, with the data converted into a genlight object for analysis using packages such as vcfR, poppr, ape and adegenet.</p>
<p>To untangle the relationships among the dogs, the researchers deployed a battery of complementary analyses. They constructed a phylogenetic distance tree from pairwise genetic distances, supported by 100 bootstrap replicates, and built minimum spanning networks in which each dog is a node connected to its closest genetic relatives. They also performed principal component analysis, which compresses genome-wide SNP variation into a few independent axes, and discriminant analysis of principal components, a multivariate method that maximizes separation between predefined groups without the strong assumptions of Bayesian clustering approaches. Finally, membership probability plots estimated the likelihood that each individual belongs to a particular genetic cluster, providing a visual summary of population structure across the four states.</p>
<p>The results paint a coherent phylogeographic picture. Samples from Punjab and Himachal Pradesh showed the closest genetic similarity to one another, followed by Karnataka and then Haryana, indicating that geographic proximity and possibly historical movement of dogs have left detectable signatures in the genome. On the distance tree, the Labrador Retriever clustered most closely with the German Shepherd, while the Pug grouped with the Indian breeds, the Gaddi, Tibetan Mastiff and Mudhol Hound. In the minimum spanning network, a Tibetan Mastiff from Himachal Pradesh occupied a central position, sharing many SNPs with surrounding samples, while a German Shepherd acted as a hub connecting several exotic-breed branches. The researchers caution that central nodes in such networks represent shared ancestral-like SNP profiles rather than actual ancestors of the other samples.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most striking conclusion is that the indigenous breeds carry greater genetic diversity than their exotic counterparts. The authors attribute this to long-term adaptation to local environments and varied ecological niches, from the high Himalayan pastures patrolled by Gaddi dogs to the Deccan plains where Mudhol Hounds have been bred for centuries as coursing hounds. Higher diversity can translate into greater resistance to disease and environmental change, and it bolsters the overall health of India&#8217;s canine gene pool. By contrast, exotic pedigree breeds, shaped by closed studbooks and intensive selection, typically exhibit narrower genetic variation. The contrast also highlights the threats posed by unregulated crossbreeding and urbanization, which could gradually erode the distinctive genetic makeup of native populations.</p>
<p>The study is the first to characterize the Gaddi and Mudhol Hound at the molecular level, filling a conspicuous gap in canine genomics. Dogs were the first animals domesticated from wild species roughly 15,000 years ago, and more than 400 breeds exist today, yet the genomic resources underpinning canine research, from the original 2005 Boxer reference genome to the newer German Shepherd-derived assembly and the Dog10K consortium&#8217;s sequencing of 2,000 canids, have focused overwhelmingly on Western breeds. By anchoring Indian dogs in that framework, using the ROS_Cfam_1.0 genome as the alignment reference, the new work extends the reach of population genomics to a region whose canine heritage has been underexplored.</p>
<p>Beyond its evolutionary insights, the research has practical implications for breeding and conservation. The dense SNP catalog provides a foundation for future genome-wide association studies aimed at identifying alleles underlying traits of interest, and for marker-assisted selection programs that could enhance genetic improvement while preserving diversity. The dataset has been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive under BioProject accession PRJNA843534, making it available to other researchers. The work was funded by the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, through a collaborative project on parentage determination and cytogenetic profiling in dogs.</p>
<p>The broader message is one of urgency tempered by opportunity. The authors note that the creation of dog breeds is a recent event arising from mixed ancestral stock, and that localized breeding practices and historical forces have sculpted the genetic makeup of each population. The clear genetic clusters revealed by the DAPC and membership probability analyses confirm that breed boundaries are real and detectable in genomic data, even in a modest sample of fifty dogs. As India urbanizes and imported breeds grow in popularity, the window for documenting and conserving native canine genetic resources may be narrowing. This study demonstrates that the tools to do so, from restriction-enzyme-based sequencing to open-source population genetics software, are now firmly within reach, and that the dogs guarding Himalayan flocks and coursing hares across the Deccan carry a genomic legacy worth preserving.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Genome-wide SNP-based phylogeographic and genetic diversity analysis of indigenous and exotic dog breeds in India</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Phylogeographic and genetic diversity analysis through genome-wide SNPs in indigenous and exotic canine breeds owned in India</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kaur, B., Yathish, H. M., Kashyap, N., &amp; Mukhopadhyay, C. S. (2025). Phylogeographic and genetic diversity analysis through genome-wide SNPs in indigenous and exotic canine breeds owned in India. <em>Discover Biotechnology, 2</em>(1), Article 5. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44340-025-00012-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44340-025-00012-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44340-025-00012-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44340-025-00012-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> dog genetics, genome-wide SNPs, ddRAD-GBS, Gaddi dog, Mudhol Hound, Tibetan Mastiff, phylogeography, genetic diversity, population structure, India, DAPC, conservation genomics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">228639</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
