<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>genebank wheat collection screening &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/genebank-wheat-collection-screening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:37:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Genebank Goldmine Yields New Wheat Defenses Against Devastating Rust Diseases</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/genebank-goldmine-yields-new-wheat-defenses-against-devastating-rust-diseases/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candidate genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[candidate genes for wheat rust resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genebank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genebank collections for crop disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genebank wheat collection screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic resistance to leaf rust and stripe rust in wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome-wide association study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomic analysis of wheat rust resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genotyping-by-sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global wheat germplasm screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-throughput phenotyping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identification of wheat rust resistance loci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large-scale wheat genetic diversity study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf rust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practical workflows for genebank utilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puccinia striiformis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puccinia triticina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable wheat production and disease management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat breeding for rust disease resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat rust resistance genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yellow rust]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196411</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A large-scale screen of nearly 2,000 spring wheat genebank accessions has uncovered novel genetic loci and elite germplasm conferring resistance to leaf rust and yellow rust.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wheat feeds roughly a third of humanity, yet its harvests are under constant siege from two fungal foes: leaf rust, caused by <em>Puccinia triticina</em>, and yellow rust, also called stripe rust, caused by <em>Puccinia striiformis</em> f. sp. <em>tritici</em>. Both pathogens can strip substantial yields and degrade grain quality, and both evolve quickly enough to defeat resistance genes that breeders deploy in elite cultivars. In a large-scale study published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, researchers led by Behnaz Soleimani and Anne-Kathrin Pfrieme of the Julius Kuehn-Institute in Germany screened nearly two thousand spring wheat accessions from the German Federal ex situ Genebank to find fresh genetic ammunition against these diseases. Their findings reveal previously unreported resistance loci, six promising candidate genes, and a practical workflow that other teams can copy to unlock the dormant potential of genebank collections worldwide.</p>
<p>The scale of the investigation is what sets it apart. The team evaluated 1,984 spring wheat genotypes drawn from 65 countries, spanning Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe, and Oceania, with Asia contributing the largest share at 1,040 accessions. Each genotype was tested for seedling-stage resistance to aggressive isolates of both rust fungi using detached-leaf assays conducted in greenhouse batches. Rather than relying on slow, subjective visual scoring, the researchers employed Macrobot, a semi-automated high-throughput phenotyping platform that images infected leaf segments and quantifies the percentage of diseased tissue with the BluVision software. Up to seven leaf segments per genotype served as biological replicates, and the platform handled the resulting mountain of samples with standardized, non-destructive measurement after an eight-day incubation for leaf rust and a fifteen-day incubation for yellow rust.</p>
<p>To convert raw images into reliable trait values, the team fitted linear mixed models that accounted for experiment and tray effects, flagged outliers through residual analysis, and calculated best linear unbiased estimates for each genotype. Broad-sense heritability came out at 0.54 for leaf rust resistance, indicating a strong genetic component, and 0.38 for yellow rust, where a longer incubation period, variable inoculation efficiency, and differences in symptom development inflated residual variance. The distributions of infection levels were continuous and largely unimodal, a pattern consistent with quantitative, polygenic inheritance rather than a handful of major genes acting alone. Notably, 1,323 genotypes outperformed the susceptible control for leaf rust and 1,287 did so for yellow rust, while 875 accessions showed reduced infection against both pathogens simultaneously, even though the overall correlation between the two resistance traits was weak and positive at just 0.14.</p>
<p>On the genotyping side, the researchers used a two-enzyme genotyping-by-sequencing protocol with PstI and MspI, sequencing barcoded sample pools on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 to an average of 2.5 million reads per genotype. After aligning reads to the Chinese Spring RefSeq V2.1 wheat genome, imputing missing data with Beagle, and filtering out markers with high missingness, low minor allele frequency, or excessive heterozygosity, the final working set contained 90,283 genome-wide markers. Population structure analysis with the STRUCTURE software and the Evanno delta-K method pointed to three ancestral subpopulations. The first cluster was dominated by accessions from Southern and Eastern Asia, particularly India and China; the second was led by Iranian germplasm; and the third, comprising just over half the panel, was spread more evenly across Europe, Asia, the Americas, Africa, and Australia. This geographic breadth is precisely what makes genebank panels so valuable for resistance discovery.</p>
<p>The heart of the study was a genome-wide association study run through four complementary statistical frameworks: TASSEL and GAPIT with compressed mixed linear models, the multilocus FarmCPU algorithm, and GenABEL. The rationale for this quadruple screening is methodological rigor. Single-locus and multilocus models each carry their own biases, and spurious associations can arise from population structure or kinship. By requiring that a marker-trait association be detected by all four methods, the team deliberately traded sensitivity for specificity, retaining only the most defensible signals. A linkage disequilibrium decay analysis across all 21 chromosomes, which yielded an average decay distance of roughly 2.6 million base pairs, defined the quantitative trait locus intervals around each significant peak marker.</p>
<p>The consensus screen delivered six reliable associations for each disease. For leaf rust, the shared markers mapped to chromosomes 3B, 4B, 4D, 5A, and 7D, with two independent peaks on chromosome 4D, and none of these six loci overlapped previously reported resistance regions, marking them as entirely novel. For yellow rust, the six consensus markers sat on chromosomes 1D, 2B, 4A, 5B, and 6B, with three markers on 6B, and four of the yellow rust loci co-localized with resistance regions reported in earlier studies, including work on the adult-plant gene Yr86 on chromosome 1D and recent genomics-driven discoveries on 6B. The agreement between the new data and these prior findings strengthens confidence in the stable, reproducible nature of those loci, while the completely fresh leaf rust regions expand the catalog of available resistance targets.</p>
<p>Within the linkage-disequilibrium-defined intervals, the team searched for high-confidence candidate genes using functional annotations, gene ontology terms, and transcriptome evidence. Among the markers shared across all four association models, six candidate genes emerged for each disease. The yellow rust candidates include a cysteine-rich receptor-like kinase on chromosome 4A, a family of pattern-recognition proteins known to trigger defense signaling against <em>P. striiformis</em>, and an NBS-LRR immune receptor on chromosome 6B, a classic intracellular guard protein that initiates oxidative bursts, kinase cascades, and hypersensitive responses. The leaf rust candidates include a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor on chromosome 5A, positioned to regulate hormone signaling and defense gene expression, and a receptor kinase 1 homologous to the well-characterized Lr10 resistance pathway. The authors are careful to note that association mapping alone demonstrates proximity, not causality, so fine mapping and functional validation remain essential next steps.</p>
<p>Beyond the loci themselves, the study identified elite germplasm ready for breeding use. Comparing allele effects from the association output with phenotypic performance, the researchers pinpointed six accessions, originating from Europe, Asia, and the Americas, that carry multiple favorable alleles for both rust diseases. These genotypes stack several previously unknown resistance quantitative trait loci and represent ready-made donors for pyramiding programs. Because race-specific major genes tend to be overcome within years as pathogen populations mutate and recombine, combining multiple resistance loci, especially ones never before deployed, is considered one of the most effective strategies for extending the durability of resistance in the field. The six multi-resistant accessions demonstrate that favorable alleles are distributed across continents and can be combined from diverse genetic backgrounds.</p>
<p>The authors also acknowledge the limitations of their design. Phenotyping occurred exclusively at the seedling stage under controlled greenhouse conditions using single isolates of each pathogen, so the detected loci primarily reflect seedling resistance, and their performance against the broader pathogen diversity found in farmers&#8217; fields remains to be tested. The lower heritability for yellow rust means some smaller-effect loci may have gone undetected. Complementary multi-isolate experiments and adult-plant field trials will be needed to confirm the stability and breadth of the newly discovered regions. Even so, the study delivers a template for modern pre-breeding: automate phenotyping at genebank scale, genotype with sequencing-based markers, and triangulate associations across multiple statistical models to strip away method-dependent noise. As rust pathogens continue their evolutionary arms race against wheat, the millions of accessions sitting in cold storage around the world may hold the resistance genes of tomorrow, and this work shows how to find them efficiently and reliably.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Genome-wide association mapping of leaf rust and yellow rust resistance in spring wheat genebank genetic resources</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Unlocking the potential of spring wheat genetic resources: uncovering resistance sources against leaf rust and yellow rust</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Unlocking the potential of spring wheat genetic resources: uncovering resistance sources against leaf rust and yellow rust. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05365-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05365-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05365-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00122-026-05365-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> wheat, leaf rust, yellow rust, genome-wide association study, genebank, disease resistance, genotyping-by-sequencing, plant breeding, Puccinia triticina, Puccinia striiformis, candidate genes, high-throughput phenotyping</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196411</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
