<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>galvanic corrosion &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/galvanic-corrosion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 22:11:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Pyrite Acts as Hidden Battery Driving Antimony Release from Mine Minerals</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/pyrite-acts-as-hidden-battery-driving-antimony-release-from-mine-minerals/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faith Mcneil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 22:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acidophilic microorganisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antimony mining environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antimony ore mineralogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodissolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical mechanisms of mineral dissolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental geochemistry and health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental geochemistry of antimony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galvanic corrosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geochemical factors controlling antimony mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydroxyl radicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iron cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial oxidation of sulfide minerals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mine drainage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mine waste management and pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mineral dissolution in mine waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pyrite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pyrite-induced antimony release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of pyrite in geochemical processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stibnite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategic elements in mineral deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfur cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water-rock interactions in mine drainage]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=229291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A 42-day factorial experiment shows that pyrite galvanically couples with stibnite to drive antimony ore biodissolution, with microbes sustaining iron and sulfur cycling and light accelerating interfacial oxidation.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antimony is one of the most strategically important yet environmentally troublesome elements on the periodic table. It sits at the heart of flame retardants, semiconductors, and lead-acid battery alloys, and its supply chains have become a matter of geopolitical concern. But in the abandoned tunnels and waste heaps of antimony mines, the element begins a very different journey. There, the primary ore mineral stibnite, an antimony sulfide with the chemical formula Sb2S3, slowly reacts with water, oxygen, and microorganisms, releasing antimony into streams and soils. A new study published in Environmental Geochemistry and Health has now dissected, with unusual precision, the electrochemical machinery that governs this release, and its central finding is striking: the common iron sulfide pyrite, often simply a gangue mineral sitting next to stibnite, turns out to be the dominant factor controlling how fast the ore dissolves.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Xiaoyan Liu and Yirong Wang of the School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering at Central South University in Changsha, China, together with colleagues including corresponding author Hongchang Liu and Zhenyuan Nie, designed a 42-day experiment with a 2 × 2 × 2 factorial structure. That means they independently varied three factors: the mineral composition, with and without pyrite mixed into the stibnite; the light conditions, running parallel treatments under illumination and in complete darkness; and the biological conditions, with and without a community of acidophilic microorganisms of the kind that thrive in acidic mine drainage. By crossing these factors, the team could separate the contribution of each variable and, crucially, detect the interactions between them that simpler experiments would miss.</p>
<p>The analytical arsenal deployed in the study was correspondingly broad. The researchers tracked solution chemistry over the entire incubation, examined the chemical composition of mineral surfaces using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, characterized the structure of the microbial communities that developed in each treatment, measured the electrochemical behavior of the mineral pairs, and monitored signals of hydroxyl radicals, the ferociously reactive species denoted ·OH that can oxidize sulfide minerals and their dissolved products. This combination allowed the group to link macroscopic dissolution rates to molecular-scale interfacial processes, a connection that has long been difficult to establish for mixed sulfide mineral systems in mining environments.</p>
<p>The headline result concerns galvanic coupling. When two minerals with different electrochemical potentials are in electrical contact in an electrolyte, they behave like a short-circuited battery: the mineral with the lower rest potential becomes the anode and dissolves preferentially, while the more noble mineral acts as the cathode. Electrochemical analyses in the study confirmed that in pyrite–stibnite mixtures, pyrite assumes the cathodic role and stibnite the anodic one. In practical terms, the presence of pyrite accelerates the anodic dissolution of stibnite, effectively wiring the antimony ore into a corrosion cell that keeps pushing electrons out of the stibnite lattice. The authors identify this pyrite–stibnite galvanic coupling as the primary electrochemical process driving stibnite biodissolution in their experiments, which explains why pyrite emerged as the dominant factor among all the variables tested.</p>
<p>The microbial dimension of the study adds a second, complementary layer to the mechanism. Under biotic conditions, pyrite did more than serve as a passive cathode. Its dissolution released iron and sulfur species into solution, and these products sustained microbial iron and sulfur cycling. Acidophilic microorganisms, notably iron oxidizers of the kind well known from bioleaching systems, oxidize ferrous iron to ferric iron, and ferric iron is itself a powerful oxidant that attacks sulfide minerals. By feeding this cycle, pyrite-derived Fe and S species enabled continuous Fe3+ regeneration, maintaining an oxidizing environment that supported ongoing stibnite dissolution even as the experiment progressed over six weeks. In other words, the microbes and the minerals form a self-reinforcing loop: pyrite supplies the chemical fuel, microbes regenerate the oxidant, and stibnite pays the price by dissolving.</p>
<p>Light, the third experimental variable, played a more subtle but chemically elegant role. Pyrite is a semiconductor, and illumination can promote electrons across its band gap, altering the way charge transfers at the mineral–water interface. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results quantify this effect vividly. On mineral surfaces exposed to light, the relative proportion of sulfate, the fully oxidized end product of sulfide oxidation, rose from 29.80 percent in the dark to 63.89 percent under illumination. Meanwhile, residual sulfide on the surfaces fell from 50.33 percent to just 15.55 percent. These numbers indicate that light substantially accelerated the surface oxidation of the sulfide minerals, shifting the interfacial chemistry toward more complete oxidation. The study concludes that light mainly affected interfacial electron transfer rather than acting as the primary driver of dissolution in its own right.</p>
<p>Accompanying the photochemical effect was a change in reactive oxygen chemistry. The pyrite-bearing biotic system exposed to light displayed stronger hydroxyl radical signals than its dark counterpart. Hydroxyl radicals are among the most potent oxidants in aqueous chemistry, and previous work has shown that pyrite surfaces can generate them through reactions involving oxygen, water, and intermediate hydrogen peroxide. The new findings tie this radical production into the broader dissolution picture: in systems containing both pyrite and stibnite under illumination, interfacial electron transfer and radical-mediated oxidation reinforce one another, deepening the oxidative transformation of the mineral surfaces and, by extension, the mobilization of antimony.</p>
<p>Why does this matter beyond the laboratory? Antimony contamination around mining districts is a serious environmental and public health issue, and the mobility of antimony in water depends strongly on its oxidation state and speciation. Understanding what controls the rate at which stibnite weathers is therefore essential for predicting how antimony spreads from mine waste into rivers, sediments, and groundwater. The study&#8217;s finding that a seemingly inert companion mineral can electrochemically accelerate ore dissolution means that risk assessments based on stibnite alone may substantially underestimate release rates in pyrite-rich ores, which are common in nature. The work also resonates with earlier research showing that pyrite-induced hydroxyl radicals can oxidize antimonite, the reduced form of antimony, hinting that the galvanic and radical pathways may jointly shape antimony speciation in the field.</p>
<p>The research also carries implications for the industrial side of the antimony story. Bioleaching, the use of acidophilic microbes to extract metals from sulfide ores, relies on precisely the same chemistry that mobilizes antimony in the environment. If pyrite–stibnite galvanic coupling is the dominant dissolution mechanism, then process designers could exploit it deliberately, tuning mineral blends, ferric iron regeneration, and even illumination to enhance metal recovery from refractory antimony ores and metallurgical residues. Conversely, in remediation scenarios, suppressing the galvanic contact or interrupting microbial iron cycling could slow antimony release from tailings. The same electrochemical insight thus cuts in two directions, offering both a hazard model and a process lever.</p>
<p>What makes the study conceptually satisfying is its synthesis of three traditionally separate perspectives on sulfide mineral weathering: electrochemistry, microbiology, and photochemistry. Rather than treating these as competing explanations, the factorial design reveals them as nested layers of one system. Pyrite sets the electrochemical stage by forming a corrosion couple with stibnite; the microbial community maintains the oxidizing atmosphere by cycling iron and sulfur species; and light modulates the rate of interfacial electron transfer while amplifying hydroxyl radical production. For anyone tracking the environmental fate of antimony, from mine-site hydrologists to geochemists modeling critical raw material flows, the message is that the invisible wiring between minerals, microbes, and photons deserves as much attention as the ore itself. The full study is available in Environmental Geochemistry and Health under DOI 10.1007/s10653-026-03484-2.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Pyrite-driven galvanic and microbial mechanisms controlling stibnite biodissolution under light and dark conditions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> The influence mechanism of pyrite on the biodissolution of stibnite under light/darkness conditions</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Liu, X., Wang, Y., Wu, D., Chen, L., Liu, H., Yang, W., Muhammad, A., Lai, J., &amp; Nie, Z. (2026). The influence mechanism of pyrite on the biodissolution of stibnite under light/darkness conditions. <em>Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 48</em>(14), Article 581. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-026-03484-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-026-03484-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-026-03484-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10653-026-03484-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> antimony, stibnite, pyrite, galvanic corrosion, biodissolution, acidophilic microorganisms, iron cycling, sulfur cycling, hydroxyl radicals, mine drainage, photochemistry, Environmental Geochemistry and Health</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">229291</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simple Heat Treatment Boosts Wear and Corrosion Resistance of Rare Earth Magnesium Alloys</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/simple-heat-treatment-boosts-wear-and-corrosion-resistance-of-rare-earth-magnesium-alloys/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 01:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corrosion resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of heat treatment on magnesium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galvanic corrosion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat treatment for corrosion resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving magnesium alloy hardness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LPSO phase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnesium alloy aerospace components]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnesium alloy automotive parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnesium alloy biomedical applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnesium alloy high-temperature strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnesium alloy sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnesium alloy wear properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnesium alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnesium corrosion mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mg-Zn-Dy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mg-Zn-Gd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microstructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precipitation hardening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rare earth elements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rare earth elements in magnesium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rare earth magnesium alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T6 temper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear resistance]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=209657</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A T6 heat treatment raises hardness by up to 25 percent, cuts corrosion rates by as much as 60 percent, and improves wear resistance in Mg-Zn-Gd and Mg-Zn-Dy magnesium alloys through the formation of uniformly distributed LPSO phases.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Magnesium has long been celebrated as the lightest structural metal available to engineers, offering a combination of high specific strength, excellent castability, and remarkable vibration damping that makes it a compelling candidate for everything from automotive gearboxes and steering wheels to aerospace components and biodegradable medical implants. Yet magnesium has always carried a set of stubborn weaknesses: it corrodes far too readily in aggressive environments, it loses strength at elevated temperatures, and it wears away quickly when sliding against harder surfaces. A new study published in the Journal of Materials Science: Metallurgy now shows that a carefully calibrated heat treatment can attack several of these weaknesses at once, raising hardness by twenty to twenty-five percent and slashing corrosion rates by as much as sixty percent in two experimental rare earth magnesium alloys.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Rakesh K.R. of the National Institute of Technology Karnataka together with Pratyush Mohanty, Srikanth Bontha, Ramesh M.R., and Vamsi Krishna Balla of CSIR-Central Glass and Ceramic Research Institute, focused on two alloy compositions: Mg-1Zn-2Gd-0.4Zr and Mg-1Zn-2Dy-0.4Zr, all concentrations given in weight percent. Gadolinium and dysprosium are rare earth elements prized for their high solubility in magnesium at eutectic temperature, roughly 23.49 and 25.8 weight percent respectively, which makes them ideal for precipitation hardening. Zirconium was included in both alloys as a grain refiner, a role it performs more effectively than any other known refining method in zinc-containing magnesium melts. The alloys were prepared by conventional casting under a protective argon atmosphere containing two percent sulfur hexafluoride, with the melt held and stirred at 750 degrees Celsius before being poured into a cast iron mold.</p>
<p>The centerpiece of the study was the classic T6 heat treatment schedule: solution treatment at 500 degrees Celsius for twelve hours, water quenching, and then artificial aging at 225 degrees Celsius for periods of twelve, eighteen, or twenty-four hours, designated T6-12, T6-18, and T6-24. Hardness measurements using a Brinell tester with a ten millimeter steel ball indenter under a 250 kilogram load revealed that aging for twelve hours produced the most significant gains. The Mg-Zn-Gd alloy climbed from 37 BHN in the as-cast state to 47 BHN after T6-12, while the Mg-Zn-Dy alloy rose from 39 BHN to 46 BHN. Extending the aging time to eighteen or twenty-four hours offered no meaningful further improvement, so the researchers adopted T6-12 as the optimum condition for all subsequent wear and corrosion comparisons.</p>
<p>The microscopic origin of these gains lies in a dramatic restructuring of the secondary phases. In the as-cast condition, both alloys displayed dendritic grains with thick eutectic phases segregated along grain boundaries in a highly non-uniform fashion. After solution treatment, these coarse eutectic networks largely dissolved into the alpha-magnesium matrix, and fine lamellar precipitates of the long period stacking ordered type, known as LPSO phases, nucleated within the grains. Transmission electron microscopy confirmed the lamellar LPSO morphology in both alloys, with energy dispersive spectroscopy showing the phases were strongly enriched in gadolinium at 78.39 weight percent in the Mg-Zn-Gd alloy and dysprosium at 82.99 weight percent in the Mg-Zn-Dy alloy. X-ray diffraction added corroborating evidence: new MgGd3 peaks appeared in the heat-treated Mg-Zn-Gd alloy at approximately 33 and 57 degrees two-theta, while in the heat-treated Mg-Zn-Dy alloy the Mg24Dy5 peaks vanished entirely, indicating dissolution of the eutectic phases.</p>
<p>These microstructural changes translated directly into superior tribological performance. Dry sliding wear tests were conducted on a pin-on-disc apparatus against an EN-24 steel counterface at applied loads of 10 and 20 newtons, temperatures ranging from 200 to 400 degrees Celsius, a sliding velocity of 1.25 meters per second, and a total sliding distance of 1500 meters, following the ASTM G-99 standard. Across every condition, the heat-treated alloys exhibited lower wear rates than their as-cast counterparts, consistent with Archard&#8217;s law, which states that wear rate is inversely proportional to hardness. The Mg-Zn-Gd alloy consistently outperformed the Mg-Zn-Dy alloy, and for the gadolinium-bearing composition the wear rate actually fell from 1.6 times ten to the minus three cubic millimeters per millimeter to 1.2 times ten to the minus three as the test temperature rose from 200 to 400 degrees Celsius under a 10 newton load.</p>
<p>The seemingly paradoxical improvement of wear resistance at higher temperatures is explained by the behavior of oxide debris. Scanning electron microscopy of the worn surfaces revealed parallel ridges and grooves characteristic of abrasive wear, along with sheet-like delaminated particles and craters at the heavier 20 newton load, signatures of delamination wear in which subsurface cracks propagate parallel to the surface before shearing off thin wear sheets. At elevated temperatures, however, frictional heating oxidized both the sliding surfaces and the wear debris. X-ray diffraction of the worn pins detected zinc oxide on both alloys and magnesium oxide on the dysprosium alloy, confirming that a compact oxide glaze had formed. This oxidized debris fills the valleys of the worn surface, prevents direct metal-to-metal contact with the steel disc, and acts as a solid lubricant, simultaneously reducing the coefficient of friction and the wear rate.</p>
<p>Corrosion testing delivered perhaps the most striking results of the study. The team immersed polished specimens in 3.5 weight percent sodium chloride solution for 72 hours at 30 degrees Celsius, collecting the evolved hydrogen and measuring weight loss to compute corrosion rates. The as-cast Mg-Zn-Gd alloy corroded at 3.86 millimeters per year, but after T6-12 treatment the rate dropped to 1.48 millimeters per year, a reduction of roughly sixty-one percent. The Mg-Zn-Dy alloy improved from 3.92 to 2.62 millimeters per year, a thirty percent reduction. Electron microscopy of the corroded surfaces showed severe galvanic attack and deep pitting penetrating to the subsurface in the as-cast samples, whereas the heat-treated Mg-Zn-Gd surface displayed only mild filiform corrosion with large areas left entirely untouched.</p>
<p>The mechanism behind the corrosion improvement is a textbook illustration of how microstructure governs electrochemistry. In the as-cast alloys, the large, sparsely distributed eutectic phases act as cathodes adjacent to the anodic alpha-magnesium matrix, driving aggressive galvanic corrosion. After solution treatment, these cathodic eutectic phases dissolve, and the resulting fine, homogeneously distributed precipitates including the LPSO phases raise the anode-to-cathode area ratio and act as barriers that impede corrosion propagation. Gadolinium-bearing secondary phases in the treated alloy form a more continuous network along grain boundaries that effectively blocks corrosive attack, while the dysprosium alloy retains some clustered intermetallic precipitates that continue to behave as localized galvanic cathodes, explaining why Mg-Zn-Gd outperformed Mg-Zn-Dy in both as-cast and heat-treated conditions.</p>
<p>The implications reach well beyond the laboratory. Magnesium alloys containing rare earth elements are already irreplaceable in aerospace and defense applications despite their cost, and the automotive industry continues to push magnesium components as a route to lighter, more fuel-efficient vehicles. By demonstrating that a simple, industrially routine T6 treatment, twelve hours of solutionizing at 500 degrees Celsius followed by twelve hours of aging at 225 degrees Celsius, can simultaneously harden these alloys, reduce their wear rates across a broad temperature window, and cut their corrosion rates by up to sixty percent, the researchers have provided a low-cost, scalable route to magnesium alloys that are far more durable in service. The study also underscores the special value of LPSO phases, whose high hardness, thermal stability, and coherent interfaces with the magnesium matrix make them ideal strengthening agents for both tribological and corrosion performance, pointing the way toward the next generation of lightweight magnesium engineering alloys.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Heat treatment effects on the microstructure, wear, and corrosion behavior of Mg-Zn-Gd and Mg-Zn-Dy magnesium alloys</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Heat treatment of Mg-Zn-Gd and Mg-Zn-Dy alloys for enhanced wear and corrosion properties</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> K.R, R., Mohanty, P., Bontha, S., M.R, R., &amp; Balla, V. K. (2026). Heat treatment of Mg-Zn-Gd and Mg-Zn-Dy alloys for enhanced wear and corrosion properties. <em>Journal of Materials Science: Metallurgy, 1</em>(1), Article 7. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44492-026-00008-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44492-026-00008-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44492-026-00008-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44492-026-00008-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> magnesium alloys, Mg-Zn-Gd, Mg-Zn-Dy, heat treatment, T6 temper, LPSO phase, precipitation hardening, wear resistance, corrosion resistance, rare earth elements, microstructure, galvanic corrosion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">209657</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
