<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fungal physiology &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/fungal-physiology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:20:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Shellfish-Derived Sugar Turns Yeast Cells Transparent to Science</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/shellfish-derived-sugar-turns-yeast-cells-transparent-to-science/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 10:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antifungal agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Candida albicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell envelope disruption in yeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell permeabilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chitosan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chitosan yeast cell permeability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chitosan's role in cell wall analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deacetylation of chitin for biochemical research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debaryomyces hansenii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrostatic interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enzymatic activity measurement in intact yeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorescein isothiocyanate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal cell wall structure and chitosan interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal physiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of chitosan on yeast cell walls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in situ enzyme activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbiological applications of shellfish-derived sugars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[positive charge oligosaccharides in cell studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saccharomyces cerevisiae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shellfish-derived sugar in microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transmission electron microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use of chitosan to study fungal metabolism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yeast]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=221970</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers at UNAM show that the shellfish-derived polymer chitosan permeabilizes yeast cells in a species-dependent way, enabling direct in situ measurements of enzyme activity.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A humble sugar derived from the shells of shrimp and crabs is giving microbiologists a new window into the inner workings of yeast cells. In a study published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, researchers at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México report that chitosan, a positively charged oligosaccharide best known as a dietary supplement and food preservative, can be used to gently pry open the cell envelopes of yeast, making it possible to measure enzyme activity inside intact cells without first grinding them up. The finding, led by Minerva Araiza-Villanueva and Antonio Peña of the Institute of Cellular Physiology, could streamline biochemical studies of fungal metabolism and sharpen our understanding of why some fungi shrug off chitosan while others succumb to it.</p>
<p>Chitosan is produced by deacetylating chitin, the structural polymer that fortifies crustacean shells and fungal cell walls. What makes the molecule chemically interesting is its behavior at acidic pH: in that range, abundant amino groups along its backbone grab protons from solution, converting the neutral polymer into a polycation studded with positive charges. Yeast cells, by contrast, present a largely negative face to the world, with phosphorylated mannans, glucans, and other acidic components decorating their cell walls and membranes. Opposite charges attract, and that simple electrostatic logic underlies everything chitosan does to a fungal cell. When the polycation docks onto the negatively charged cell periphery, it disrupts the carefully regulated barrier function of the envelope, allowing small molecules to leak in and out and, at sufficient concentrations, halting growth altogether.</p>
<p>Exactly how this interaction plays out, however, varies dramatically from one fungal species to another, and that variability is where the new study makes its mark. The Mexican team compared three yeasts with very different lifestyles and clinical relevance: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the brewer&#8217;s and baker&#8217;s yeast that serves as the workhorse of eukaryotic cell biology; Candida albicans, a common human commensal and opportunistic pathogen; and Debaryomyces hansenii, a salt-tolerant yeast famous for colonizing cheese rinds and other extreme food environments. By tracking growth in the presence of chitosan across these species, the researchers established a clear hierarchy of susceptibility. Debaryomyces hansenii emerged as the most vulnerable of the three, its growth strongly inhibited by the polymer, while the other species displayed comparatively milder responses. The result underscores a point that has been emerging from the antifungal literature for years: chitosan is not a blunt instrument but a strain-dependent agent whose potency depends on the fine chemistry of each organism&#8217;s surface.</p>
<p>To find out why, the team needed to watch chitosan in action rather than merely tally its consequences. They turned to a fluorescent version of the molecule, conjugating chitosan to fluorescein isothiocyanate, a dye that glows green under the microscope. This allowed them to monitor where the polymer goes and how firmly it sticks. The binding assays showed that chitosan associates with the cell periphery of all three species, becoming incorporated at the cell surface over time, but the extent of that association tracked with each species&#8217; sensitivity. The cells that bound the polymer most avidly and internalized it most readily were the ones whose growth suffered most. In other words, the antifungal effect is not some diffuse, indirect consequence of chitosan&#8217;s presence in the medium; it is written in the physical contact between polymer and cell.</p>
<p>Transmission electron microscopy provided the structural confirmation. Ultrastructural examination of treated cells revealed the damage that chitosan inflicts on the yeast envelope, consistent with its role as a permeabilizing agent. Where the polymer had acted, the orderly architecture of the cell wall and plasma membrane was compromised, and the cells showed the kinds of lesions expected when a barrier designed to hold contents in and keep the environment out begins to fail. Together, the fluorescence binding data and the electron micrographs built a coherent mechanistic picture: chitosan&#8217;s positive charges latch onto negatively charged cell-surface components, the interaction destabilizes the envelope, and permeability rises as a direct result.</p>
<p>What elevates the study beyond a mechanistic curiosity is the application the researchers built on top of it. If chitosan can open yeast cells in a controlled, tunable way, then those permeabilized cells become analytical tools in their own right. The team demonstrated exactly that, using chitosan-induced permeabilization to measure the activity of selected enzymes in situ, meaning inside cells that remain structurally intact rather than in messy homogenates. In situ measurements of this kind have long been a goal in enzymology because they preserve the native context of the cell: substrates and cofactors diffuse in through the permeabilized envelope, reactions proceed within the crowded, compartmentalized interior, and the activities read out reflect the enzymes as they actually exist in the organism, not as they behave after extraction and purification.</p>
<p>The practical implications ripple outward in several directions. For basic researchers probing fungal physiology, permeabilized yeast offers a faster and arguably more faithful route to enzyme kinetics than classical cell-free assays, which require breaking cells open, clarifying lysates, and accepting that much of the native organization is lost along the way. For the biotechnology sector, where yeasts are engineered to produce everything from bioethanol to pharmaceutical proteins, a simple chemical treatment that exposes intracellular biochemistry without destroying the cells could accelerate screening and process monitoring. And for those studying antifungal action itself, the species-dependent results provide a comparative framework: understanding why Debaryomyces hansenii is exquisitely sensitive while its relatives are more resistant may point toward the surface features, wall composition, or membrane properties that determine chitosan susceptibility in fungi more broadly.</p>
<p>The work also carries a certain elegant irony. Chitosan has been marketed for decades as a weight-loss supplement and wound dressing, and its antimicrobial properties have been exploited in food packaging and agriculture, yet the molecular details of its interaction with fungal cells have remained only partially resolved. By combining growth analysis, fluorescent binding assays, electron microscopy, and functional biochemistry in a single coherent experimental program, the UNAM team has connected those dots across three yeast species, showing that a single electrostatic mechanism, tuned by each species&#8217; surface chemistry, explains both the antifungal effect and the analytical utility of the molecule. The same property that makes chitosan lethal at high doses makes it a precise instrument at controlled ones.</p>
<p>There are, of course, caveats and open questions. The study examined three species, and the authors themselves frame chitosan&#8217;s effects as strain-dependent, which means extrapolation to other fungi, particularly filamentous molds or clinically resistant Candida strains, will require further comparative work. The precise molecular targets of chitosan at the cell periphery, and the structural thresholds that separate reversible permeabilization from irreversible damage, remain fertile ground for future investigation. The researchers also note that their article was shared early as a citable, peer-reviewed accepted version subject to further editorial processing, so some details may be refined in the final version of record.</p>
<p>Even so, the central achievement stands. A team working with modest resources, supported by grants from UNAM&#8217;s Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, has taken a molecule familiar from seafood waste streams and turned it into a dual-purpose reagent: an antifungal agent whose species-specific action illuminates the chemistry of the fungal envelope, and a permeabilization tool that lets enzymologists watch metabolism from the inside. As interest in fungal biology grows, driven by rising rates of invasive fungal infections and by the central role of yeasts in industrial fermentation, tools that bridge the gap between living cells and laboratory measurement are likely to be in steady demand. Chitosan, it turns out, was sitting on the shelf all along.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Chitosan-induced permeabilization of yeast cell envelopes and its application to in situ enzymatic measurements</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Chitosan-induced permeabilization in yeast and its use for in situ enzymatic measurements</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Araiza-Villanueva, M., Sánchez, N. S., Calahorra, M., Padilla-Garfias, F., &amp; Peña, A. (2026). Chitosan-induced permeabilization in yeast and its use for in situ enzymatic measurements. <em>Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-026-14027-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-026-14027-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-026-14027-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00253-026-14027-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> chitosan, yeast, cell permeabilization, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Candida albicans, Debaryomyces hansenii, in situ enzyme activity, electrostatic interaction, antifungal agents, fungal physiology, transmission electron microscopy, fluorescein isothiocyanate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">221970</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fungal Killers&#8217; Hidden Chemistry: Giant Gene Atlas Reveals How Wheat Scab Pathogen Thrives</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/fungal-killers-hidden-chemistry-giant-gene-atlas-reveals-how-wheat-scab-pathogen-thrives/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 21:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antiSMASH genome annotation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biosynthetic gene cluster mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biosynthetic gene clusters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cell wall integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop disease control strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deoxynivalenol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental stress resistance in fungi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal pathogen metabolic pathways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal physiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fungal secondary metabolite gene clusters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungal survival mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusarium graminearum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fusarium graminearum genome analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fusarium head blight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome mining in fungi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knockout library]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mycotoxin deoxynivalenol production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mycotoxins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary metabolites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secondary metabolites in fungal growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[siderophore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virulence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat head blight pathogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wheat infection]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=210609</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A genome-scale knockout study of Fusarium graminearum reveals that dozens of secondary metabolite gene clusters govern growth, stress tolerance, spore development, and virulence, identifying two previously unknown clusters as critical for wheat infection and mycotoxin production.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a landmark study that rewrites what scientists thought they knew about fungal survival, researchers have systematically dismantled, one by one, the chemical factories of one of agriculture&#8217;s most devastating enemies. Fusarium graminearum, the fungus behind Fusarium head blight, destroys wheat and barley harvests worldwide and poisons grain with deoxynivalenol, a mycotoxin that threatens food safety for humans and livestock. For decades, the secondary metabolites produced by this pathogen were viewed primarily as weapons for attacking plants. The new work, published in the journal Crop Health, reveals that these metabolic gene clusters do far more than fuel infection: they are deeply woven into the fungus&#8217;s growth, development, and ability to withstand environmental stress, fundamentally reshaping the search for ways to control the disease.</p>
<p>The team, led by Hao Qi and Yun Chen of Zhejiang University together with colleagues, began by mapping the complete repertoire of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters, or BGCs, in the reference strain PH-1. Using the genome mining tool antiSMASH combined with careful re-annotation of the genome, they compiled a catalog of 53 such clusters, each containing a core enzyme such as a polyketide synthase, a non-ribosomal peptide synthase, a terpene synthase, or, in some cases, hybrid combinations of these assembly lines. Non-ribosomal peptide synthase clusters were the most abundant with 23 members, followed by 13 terpene clusters, 11 polyketide clusters, five hybrids, and a single cyclodipeptide synthase cluster. Strikingly, only 15 of the 53 clusters had previously been chemically characterized, meaning most of the fungus&#8217;s chemical output remained a complete mystery.</p>
<p>To understand what these silent or poorly understood clusters actually do, the researchers built something unprecedented: a complete knockout library in which the backbone gene of every single cluster was individually deleted through homologous recombination. Each deletion was verified by PCR, with at least three independent transformants per gene, creating a permanent genetic resource for the Fusarium research community. The team then subjected all 53 mutants to an ambitious phenotyping campaign, measuring 24 different traits under a dizzying array of conditions. In total, the study generated 1,272 individual phenotypic measurements, a scale of functional annotation rarely attempted for secondary metabolism in any filamentous fungus.</p>
<p>The results demolished the long-standing assumption that secondary metabolism is a dispensable luxury. When the mutants were grown on six different culture media ranging from nutrient-rich potato dextrose agar to minimal medium, 24 of the 53 mutants showed significantly altered colony growth in at least one condition. The effects were strongly medium-dependent, a textbook example of genotype-by-environment interaction: several mutants that formed conspicuously small colonies on rich media grew perfectly well on minimal medium. This pattern suggests that certain clusters help the fungus exploit specific nutrients rather than simply acting as an energetic burden, directly contradicting the classic energy-drain model of secondary metabolism.</p>
<p>Developmental defects proved even more dramatic. Several clusters turned out to be essential for asexual reproduction, the process that generates the spores by which the fungus spreads through wheat fields. Deleting the backbone gene of cluster BGC52 or the siderophore cluster BGC27 left the fungus nearly or completely unable to produce conidia, with two mutants generating no detectable spores at all under the assay conditions. Other clusters shaped spore architecture itself: one mutant produced spores only half the normal length with fewer cross-walls, while another disrupted germination so severely that fewer than 10 percent of spores sprouted under conditions where wild-type spores germinated at roughly 90 percent. Importantly, these defects far exceeded any effects on vegetative growth, indicating that secondary metabolites actively program development rather than merely supporting it indirectly.</p>
<p>The stress experiments delivered perhaps the most conceptually surprising findings. Across 15 conditions encompassing ionic, osmotic, oxidative, cell wall, pH, temperature, and fungicide challenges, 17 mutants, or 32.1 percent of the library, showed altered sensitivity to at least one stressor. A siderophore-deficient mutant was specifically hypersensitive to vitamin K3-induced oxidative stress, consistent with the known role of siderophores in buffering redox-active iron and preventing Fenton chemistry. Mutants lacking particular polyketide pathways actually tolerated calcium stress better than the wild type, hinting at specialized roles in metal homeostasis. Fungicide treatment itself reprogrammed secondary metabolite gene expression, with carbendazim inducing ten core cluster genes, and several mutants displayed altered sensitivity to tebuconazole or phenamacril. The picture that emerges is of secondary metabolism functioning as a physiological buffer, absorbing environmental shocks rather than merely responding to them.</p>
<p>During actual infection, the gene clusters followed strikingly different timetables in different wheat tissues. In wheat heads, secondary metabolite genes showed their strongest activation three days after inoculation, while coleoptile infection displayed the opposite trajectory: early repression followed by powerful late induction, with some genes upregulated more than hundredfold or even thousandfold as infection progressed. When the researchers tested all 53 mutants for virulence, six showed significantly reduced disease on wheat heads, but the tissue specificity was remarkable. The siderophore cluster mutant, for example, was crippled on wheat heads yet indistinguishable from wild type on coleoptiles, evidence that the fungus deploys distinct chemical strategies depending on the microenvironment it invades.</p>
<p>Two previously uncharacterized clusters emerged as critical virulence factors, and their mechanistic dissection yielded genuine surprises. BGC36, a 26-gene polyketide cluster whose core synthase is homologous to the gibepyrone A biosynthetic gene in Fusarium fujikuroi, proved essential for full virulence on both wheat heads and coleoptiles. Mutants lacking any of several BGC36 genes infected the inoculated spikelet but failed to spread along the rachis, a hallmark of impaired deoxynivalenol production. Consistent with this, the mutants showed reduced expression of the trichothecene biosynthesis genes TRI1, TRI5, and TRI101, failed to form the spherical DON-toxisomes where the toxin is manufactured, and produced significantly less toxin, positioning BGC36 as a positive regulator of the mycotoxin program.</p>
<p>BGC47, a non-ribosomal peptide synthase-type cluster, revealed an entirely different route to virulence. Mutants in this cluster were hypersensitive to the cell wall stressor Congo red and the membrane disruptor SDS, released abundant protoplasts when treated with wall-degrading enzymes, and showed markedly reduced phosphorylation of Mgv1, the map kinase that anchors the cell wall integrity pathway. They also failed to form toxisomes and produced far less deoxynivalenol, suggesting that envelope stress signaling and toxin production are coupled through chromatin-level regulatory programs. The authors propose that BGC-derived metabolites may feed back into stress signaling cascades, reshaping transcriptional and epigenetic states at the trichothecene locus rather than acting through simple linear pathways.</p>
<p>The broader implications reach well beyond basic fungal biology. By demonstrating that nearly half of all predicted secondary metabolite clusters contribute measurably to growth, spore production, stress tolerance, or pathogenicity, the study establishes secondary metabolism as a core pillar of fungal physiology rather than an accessory biochemical layer. The knockout library itself constitutes a permanent community resource for assigning functions to the dozens of clusters whose chemical products remain unidentified. For agriculture, the identification of BGC36 and BGC47 as virulence determinants intertwined with deoxynivalenol biosynthesis offers fresh molecular targets: drugs or biocontrol strategies that disable these clusters could simultaneously blunt the fungus&#8217;s ability to spread through wheat heads and reduce mycotoxin contamination of the food supply, a dual benefit in the ongoing battle against one of the world&#8217;s most destructive plant diseases.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Functional analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters in the wheat pathogen Fusarium graminearum</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> A functional atlas of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters governing growth, stress adaptation, and pathogenicity in Fusarium graminearum</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Qi, H., Zhao, L., Xu, L., Liu, C., Cheng, H., Han, X., Ren, Y., Xu, C., Yan, J., Jiang, C., Ma, B., Ma, Z., &amp; Chen, Y. (2026). A functional atlas of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters governing growth, stress adaptation, and pathogenicity in Fusarium graminearum. <em>Crop Health, 4</em>(1), Article 8. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-026-00070-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-026-00070-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-026-00070-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44297-026-00070-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Fusarium graminearum, secondary metabolites, biosynthetic gene clusters, deoxynivalenol, Fusarium head blight, mycotoxins, virulence, cell wall integrity, knockout library, siderophore, wheat infection, fungal physiology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">210609</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
