<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fruit weight &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/fruit-weight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:32:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Compact tomato pangenome reveals genes steering fruit size and disease defense</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/compact-tomato-pangenome-reveals-genes-steering-fruit-size-and-disease-defense/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botrytis cinerea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chlorogenic acid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational methods in plant genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR-Cas9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop disease defense genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop genetic diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disease resistance genes in tomatoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fruit size genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fruit weight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic basis of fruit shape and flavor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph genome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph-based pangenomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gray mold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inheritance of fruit traits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural variation in tomato genomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pangenome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recombinant inbred lines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlCGT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SlILL6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streamlined pangenome analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tomato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tomato breeding genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tomato pangenome]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=240990</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A streamlined graph-based tomato pangenome built from cultivated and wild parents has uncovered a new fruit-weight gene and a regulator of chlorogenic acid that governs resistance to gray mold.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomatoes are among the most intensively bred crops on the planet, yet the genetic instructions that set the size of a fruit, shape its flavor chemistry, and determine how well it withstands fungal attack have remained scattered across a bewildering landscape of natural variation. A new study published in Horticulture Research on April 16, 2026, offers a way to bring that landscape into focus without the enormous computational cost that has traditionally accompanied pangenomic analysis. Researchers from China Agricultural University, the Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Henan University, and Huazhong Agricultural University constructed a streamlined graph-based pangenome, named MiniTG1.0, and used it to trace inherited variation from two parental genomes directly into measurable fruit traits.</p>
<p>The central problem the team set out to solve is a familiar one in crop genetics. Conventional reference genomes are linear, meaning they represent a single consensus sequence against which all other varieties are compared. Such references capture only a limited slice of the diversity that exists within a species, and variants that fall outside the reference sequence can be missed entirely. Graph-based pangenomes address this limitation by encoding the genomes of many individuals simultaneously, allowing single-nucleotide polymorphisms, insertions and deletions, and large structural variants to be represented side by side. But the very comprehensiveness that makes large graphs powerful also makes them computationally demanding, and in some cases they emphasize structural changes at the expense of smaller variants that nonetheless matter for breeding.</p>
<p>MiniTG1.0 took a deliberately economical approach. Rather than aggregating dozens or hundreds of genomes, the researchers built the graph from just two carefully chosen parents: Solanum lycopersicum TS-RS1, a cultivated tomato, and Solanum pimpinellifolium TS-RS2, its wild relative. The two lineages differ substantially in fruit weight, sugar and acid composition, and disease-related chemistry, which makes the contrasts between them informative. The graph integrated 5.76 million variants spanning SNPs, INDELs, and structural variants across the population the team would go on to analyze, providing a dense but tractable map of the differences separating the cultivated and wild genomes.</p>
<p>To connect that variation to traits, the researchers generated 230 seventh-generation recombinant inbred lines, a population in which chromosomes from the two parents have been shuffled and fixed through repeated selfing. Each line carries a unique mosaic of the parental genomes, so any trait difference among the lines can be traced back to the chromosomal segments inherited from each parent. By combining genome-wide association studies across this population with transcriptomic data, metabolite profiling, and targeted functional experiments, the team created a pipeline that moves from statistical association to experimentally verified gene function within a single framework.</p>
<p>The performance gains over a linear reference were substantial. Joint analysis of the three variant classes explained 18.18 percent more average trait heritability than the linear reference genome, and it improved the mapping of established loci controlling trichomes and growth habit. The graph also placed the H and SELF-PRUNING genes closer to their expected trait signals than the linear reference did, indicating that the compact graph preserved, and in some respects sharpened, the resolution needed to locate genes underlying complex phenotypes. For a breeding-oriented tool, that combination of efficiency and precision is the key selling point.</p>
<p>Fruit weight provided the most striking demonstration. The analysis recovered the well-known fw2.2 region, a classic locus in tomato genetics, and additionally uncovered a previously unknown fruit-weight region the team designated fw6.4. Within this new locus, the gene SlILL6 emerged as a strong candidate. When the researchers overexpressed SlILL6, the resulting plants produced fruits weighing roughly 62 to 63 grams, compared with approximately 101 grams in wild-type plants, a reduction of nearly forty percent. The evidence supports a role for SlILL6 in limiting fruit growth through altered cell expansion, adding a new entry to the short list of genes known to govern tomato fruit size.</p>
<p>The study also extended its reach into fruit chemistry. Metabolite profiling detected 1,258 compounds across the population and identified 128 that accumulated at different levels in the two parental backgrounds. A metabolome-based genome-wide association study then connected variation in chlorogenic acid, an antioxidant phenolic compound, to the gene SlCGT. This connection proved functionally meaningful in the context of disease. Using CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing, the team created knockout lines that accumulated more chlorogenic acid and, when challenged with Botrytis cinerea, the fungus responsible for gray mold, developed smaller lesions. Overexpression lines showed the opposite pattern, accumulating less chlorogenic acid and suffering larger lesions. The researchers further showed that chlorogenic acid directly suppresses fungal growth, closing the loop between gene, metabolite, and phenotype.</p>
<p>The authors emphasized that the study demonstrates how a smaller, strategically designed genome graph can deliver both computational efficiency and biological precision. By pairing a wild parent with a cultivated parent and a segregating population, the framework allowed the team to follow inherited variation directly into fruit traits rather than searching through broad diversity panels alone. The discovery of SlILL6 and SlCGT, they noted, shows how the same pipeline can move from statistical association to experimentally tested function, creating a clearer route from pangenomic data to concrete breeding decisions involving fruit size, quality-related metabolites, and resistance to postharvest disease.</p>
<p>The practical implications for molecular design breeding are considerable. SlILL6 could be evaluated as a target for adjusting fruit size, giving breeders a lever on yield that complements the classical fw2.2 locus. SlCGT offers a route to raising chlorogenic acid levels and strengthening resistance to gray mold, and notably the researchers found this could be done without reducing soluble solids in the tested lines, addressing a common trade-off between defense chemistry and fruit quality. MiniTG1.0 itself supplies a compact analytical resource for tracking small and large variants together, which may help breeders recover useful alleles from wild germplasm more efficiently than current approaches allow.</p>
<p>The researchers are careful to note the boundaries of the work. The findings were generated from two parental genomes, greenhouse-grown recombinant lines, and targeted functional tests, so field trials across diverse environments and genetic backgrounds will be needed to confirm agronomic performance, disease protection, and any trade-offs before these targets enter commercial breeding programs. Even so, the study sketches a template that other crop teams may follow: instead of building ever-larger pangenomes, choose informative parents, build a compact graph, and let a purpose-designed population carry the variation into traits that breeders can actually use. If that template proves portable, the quiet efficiency of MiniTG1.0 may matter as much as the individual genes it revealed.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Graph-based pangenomics of tomato fruit size, metabolite composition, and fungal disease resistance</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Tomato pangenome maps genes for fruit size and defense</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Tomato pangenome maps genes for fruit size and defense. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1146465" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> tomato, pangenome, graph genome, fruit weight, SlILL6, SlCGT, chlorogenic acid, gray mold, Botrytis cinerea, recombinant inbred lines, CRISPR-Cas9, molecular breeding</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">240990</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
