<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Friedel&#8217;s salt &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/friedels-salt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 21:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Steel and Soda Waste Combine to Make Cement That Traps Chloride</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/steel-and-soda-waste-combine-to-make-cement-that-traps-chloride/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 21:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alkali activation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all-solid-waste cementitious materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blast-furnace slag and fly ash in cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-(A)-S-H]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical industry waste valorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chloride ion binding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chloride solidification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chloride-resistant cementitious binder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compressive strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of industrial waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fly ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friedel's salt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground granulated blast furnace slag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocalumite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Industrial waste-based cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative cement formulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kanbara reactor desulfurization slag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soda residue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soda residue utilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel industry waste reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste-derived building materials]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=198948</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have engineered a cement made entirely from industrial wastes that accelerates hydration, densifies its microstructure and locks up corrosive chloride ions in a stable mineral phase.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, the global steel and chemical industries bury mountains of waste that could have been something more. A new study published in Waste and Biomass Valorization reports a cementitious material built entirely from industrial by-products, with no ordinary Portland cement at all, that achieves useful mechanical strength while solving one of the field&#8217;s most stubborn problems: the chloride ions that normally limit how far solid-waste binders can be used. The work, led by Yannian Zhang and Weijin Chen of Dalian Jiaotong University together with Yingliang Tan, Qingjie Wang, Moncef L. Nehdi of the University of Guelph and Weijia Meng, demonstrates a four-component system the authors call KSGF, combining Kanbara reactor desulfurization slag, soda residue, ground granulated blast-furnace slag and fly ash.</p>
<p>The two activating ingredients come from very different corners of heavy industry. Kanbara reactor desulfurization slag, or KRDS, is the residue left when molten iron is desulfurized in a Kanbara reactor vessel before steelmaking. It is rich in calcium and carries a strongly alkaline character, along with a meaningful chloride content inherited from the desulfurization process. Soda residue, or SR, is the waste stream from soda ash production, and it too is alkaline. Rather than treating these two materials as liabilities, the researchers paired them deliberately to create what they describe as a dual-alkaline solid waste synergistic activation system. Each waste contributes calcium, alkalinity and, in the case of KRDS, chloride ions, and the combination turns out to accelerate the hydration of the reactive components far more effectively than either activator alone.</p>
<p>The reactive backbone of the system is supplied by ground granulated blast-furnace slag, a well-established supplementary cementitious material from iron production, and fly ash, the fine powder captured from coal combustion flue gases. Both are alumino-silicate rich, and both respond to alkaline activation by dissolving and reprecipitating as binding phases. The team systematically adjusted the mix proportions of the four components and evaluated the resulting pastes and mortars with compressive strength and fluidity tests, mapping how the ratios of KRDS, SR, GGBS and FA governed early and later-age performance. The abbreviation KSGF denotes the full four-part system, while comparison blends such as KG, SG, KSG and KSF allowed the authors to isolate the contribution of each ingredient.</p>
<p>What makes the study more than a mix-design exercise is the depth of the microstructural investigation. The researchers characterized their materials using X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis with derivative thermogravimetry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive spectroscopy. Together these techniques reveal which crystalline and amorphous phases form, how much bound water each phase holds, how the silicate network polymerizes, and how the solid microstructure develops in three dimensions over time. The results converge on a coherent picture of why the dual-alkaline system outperforms simpler formulations.</p>
<p>The first key finding concerns tricalcium aluminate, or C3A, one of the most reactive phases in calcium-rich binders. According to the study, C3A hydration is significantly accelerated by the KR desulfurization slag and alkali-slag system through the combined action of calcium, alkalinity and chloride ions. In conventional all-solid-waste binders, hydration is often sluggish, and one reason is that an early hydration film forms on particle surfaces, acting as a barrier that inhibits further reaction. The KSGF system attacks this problem directly. As Friedel&#8217;s salt, a calcium chloroaluminate phase, grows within the hydrating matrix, the crystallization pressure it exerts disrupts the hydration film, allowing slag hydration to continue rather than stall.</p>
<p>This mechanism has cascading benefits. With the diffusion barrier broken, hydration proceeds deeper into the slag and fly ash particles, producing more calcium aluminosilicate hydrate gel, the glue-like C-(A)-S-H phase that gives the material its strength. The study further reports that the calcium-chloride synergy enhances the incorporation of aluminum into the C-(A)-S-H structure. Aluminum substitution in the silicate chain is known to cross-link and strengthen the gel network, and the resulting microstructure is measurably denser: the researchers observed reduced porosity across the system. A finer, less connected pore network generally translates into better mechanical performance and improved resistance to the transport of aggressive species.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential result, however, involves chloride. In cementitious materials, free chloride ions are notorious for depassivating reinforcing steel and triggering corrosion, which is why chloride-bearing wastes have historically been restricted in construction applications. The KSGF system flips this liability into an asset through the formation of layered hydrocalumite, a layered double hydroxide belonging to the AFm family of phases. Hydrocalumite&#8217;s positively charged layers and exchangeable interlayer anions provide an ideal host for chloride: the study shows that the activation system promotes layered hydrocalumite formation, which effectively immobilizes chloride ions and reduces the fraction of free chlorides in the pore solution. In effect, the binder locks up the very ion that would otherwise disqualify it from service.</p>
<p>The thermal behavior of this chloride-bearing phase matters too, because AFm phases can destabilize and release their bound anions at elevated temperatures. The authors report that hydrocalumite thermal stability is improved through enhanced Al-O and Ca-O bond energies via chloride-aluminum coordination. In other words, when chloride and aluminum coordinate within the hydrocalumite structure, the chemical bonds anchoring the framework become stronger, raising the temperature at which the phase degrades. This improves the overall thermal stability of the material and gives added confidence that the immobilized chloride will stay put under realistic exposure conditions, including fire scenarios that concern building designers.</p>
<p>Taken together, the findings address the three obstacles the authors set out to solve: low hydration efficiency, inhibition by early hydration films, and the restricted application of all-solid-waste cementitious materials due to chloride ions. The dual-alkaline system accelerates hydration, the calcium-chloride synergistic effect breaks the hydration film, reduces porosity and improves thermal stability, and layered hydrocalumite enables solidification of chloride while decreasing free chloride ions. The practical implication is a pathway toward construction binders in which the cement, the activator and even part of the chemistry that would normally be a contaminant all come from waste streams that would otherwise be landfilled.</p>
<p>The environmental arithmetic is compelling. Ordinary Portland cement production accounts for a substantial share of global carbon dioxide emissions, driven both by the calcination of limestone and by the fossil fuels burned to reach clinkering temperatures. All-solid-waste binders of the KSGF type sidestep clinker entirely, repurposing desulfurization slag, soda residue, blast-furnace slag and fly ash into a material whose hydration chemistry is not merely tolerated but actively engineered. The work was supported by the Key Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and several Liaoning provincial programs, reflecting the strategic weight that Chinese institutions place on industrial waste valorization. If the dual-alkaline activation strategy proves scalable, steel plants and soda ash factories could find themselves supplying not waste, but the raw materials of a lower-carbon construction industry, one hydration reaction at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A dual-alkaline all-solid-waste cementitious system combining Kanbara reactor desulfurization slag, soda residue, blast-furnace slag and fly ash with enhanced hydration and chloride solidification.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Preparation and Mechanical Properties of KSGF All-Solid-Waste Cementitious Materials</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zhang, Y., Chen, W., Tan, Y., Wang, Q., Nehdi, M. L., &amp; Meng, W. (2026). Preparation and Mechanical Properties of KSGF All-Solid-Waste Cementitious Materials. <em>Waste and Biomass Valorization</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-026-03785-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-026-03785-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-026-03785-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s12649-026-03785-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> all-solid-waste cementitious materials, Kanbara reactor desulfurization slag, soda residue, ground granulated blast-furnace slag, fly ash, chloride solidification, hydrocalumite, Friedel&#x27;s salt, alkali activation, C-(A)-S-H, compressive strength, sustainable construction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">198948</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Acid-Treated Biochar Traps Radioactive Cesium in Cement Waste Forms</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/acid-treated-biochar-traps-radioactive-cesium-in-cement-waste-forms/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 21:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid-treated biochar for radioactive waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochar-cement waste stabilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcium silicate hydrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cesium immobilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cesium leaching reduction in cementitious materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical modification of biochar in nuclear waste forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compressive strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhancement of cement waste barriers with biochar additives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friedel's salt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of nitric acid treatment on biochar cesium adsorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low- and intermediate-level nuclear waste management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitric acid treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pore structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radioactive cesium immobilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice husk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice husk biochar cesium capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface chemistry of biochar for radioactive contaminant binding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agricultural waste reuse in nuclear waste]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=192922</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in South Korea found that nitric acid-treated rice husk biochar added to cement paste at 4 percent by weight reduced cesium leaching and concentrated the radionuclide at biochar surfaces, offering a promising route for immobilizing radioactive waste.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Radioactive cesium is one of the most stubborn contaminants in the nuclear waste stream. It slips through the concrete vaults meant to hold it, largely because ordinary cement simply does not bind this single-charged, bulky ion very well. Now, a pair of researchers in South Korea has shown that a common agricultural byproduct—rice husk biochar—can be chemically tuned to grip cesium far more effectively inside hardening cement, potentially opening a new chapter in the design of waste forms for low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste.</p>
<p>The study, published in Case Studies in Construction Materials by Xuanru Wu and Jeong Gook Jang, tackled a deceptively simple question: what happens when you modify the surface of biochar before blending it into cement that has been spiked with cesium chloride? The answer, revealed through a battery of mechanical, spectroscopic, and leaching tests, is that the answer depends critically on dose. At 4 percent by weight of cement, biochar treated with nitric acid cut the 90-day cumulative fraction of leached cesium from 81.97 percent in the control to 77.01 percent, the lowest value measured in the entire study. At half that dose, the same acid treatment actually made cesium release worse, underscoring that surface chemistry alone does not tell the whole story.</p>
<p>Cesium poses a particular headache for cementitious waste forms because of its fundamental chemistry. As a monovalent cation with a large ionic radius and low charge density, cesium carries weak affinity for the calcium silicate hydrate gel—the principal binding phase that normally anchors contaminants in hardened cement. Its already limited sorption is further crowded out by abundant sodium, potassium, and calcium ions in the highly alkaline pore solution. To make matters worse, the chloride ions that arrive packaged with cesium chloride bind into Friedel&#8217;s salt within the cement, chemically decoupling the ion pair and leaving the cesium essentially free to diffuse through the pore network.</p>
<p>Biochar, produced by pyrolyzing biomass under oxygen-limited conditions, offers a chemically distinct complement to cement hydrates. Rice husk biochar pyrolyzed at 600 degrees Celsius is riddled with channel-like pores and carries hydroxyl, carboxyl, and carbonyl groups on its surface, all capable of interacting with metal cations. The researchers ground the biochar to particles smaller than 150 micrometers and bathed it in a 1 molar nitric acid solution at 60 degrees Celsius for 24 hours. This oxidation step served two purposes: it dissolved pore-blocking ash and acid-soluble mineral impurities, and it grafted additional oxygen-containing functional groups onto the carbon surface, boosting its capacity to capture positively charged ions.</p>
<p>Characterization revealed that the acid treatment worked its magic on surface chemistry rather than bulk structure. X-ray diffraction patterns of untreated and acid-treated biochar were nearly identical, both dominated by a broad amorphous peak associated with disordered turbostratic carbon and silica, confirming that the crystalline framework survived the acid bath intact. Fourier transform infrared spectra showed changes in the O–H and Si–O bands, consistent with the removal of surface impurities and rearrangement of functional groups. Most tellingly, the zeta potential shifted from minus 22.3 millivolts for the untreated biochar to minus 30.1 millivolts after treatment, a clear indication of a more strongly negatively charged surface ready to attract cations like cesium.</p>
<p>When these materials were blended into ordinary Portland cement paste at a water-to-cement ratio of 0.5, with 2 percent cesium chloride by weight of cement dissolved in the mixing water, the effects rippled through every property the team measured. After 28 days of air curing, the reference paste reached a compressive strength of 42.02 megapascals, while the paste containing 4 percent untreated biochar climbed to 52.22 megapascals, a gain of roughly 24 percent. The porous biochar particles appear to act as internal nucleation surfaces and internal curing reservoirs, releasing absorbed water gradually to sustain hydration and refine the microstructure.</p>
<p>Mercury intrusion porosimetry confirmed this pore refinement. Cumulative mercury intrusion dropped steadily as biochar content rose, and the acid-treated 4 percent mix showed the lowest intrusion of all. The pore-size distribution shifted toward gel-scale pores below 10 nanometers, at the expense of large capillary pores and macropores above 1000 nanometers. Fewer and finer transport pathways mean fewer escape routes for dissolved cesium, which is precisely why the leaching results and the porosity data reinforce each other in the higher-dosage mixes.</p>
<p>The most striking evidence of cesium capture came from scanning electron microscopy paired with energy-dispersive spectroscopy. In pastes containing acid-treated biochar, cesium was clearly detected at carbon-rich regions and at the biochar–cement interface—remarkable, given that the cesium chloride had been dissolved in the mixing water rather than pre-loaded onto the biochar. Quantitatively, the cesium-to-carbon atomic ratio in the carbon-rich regions of the acid-treated paste was 0.0276, compared with just 0.00365 in the untreated counterpart, an approximately 7.6-fold increase. This localized enrichment indicates that cesium preferentially migrated from the pore solution toward the electronegative biochar surfaces during hydration and was retained there.</p>
<p>The trade-offs, however, are real. At 4 percent dosage, the acid-treated paste actually showed lower compressive strength than its untreated counterpart, likely because the more negatively charged surface coordinates calcium ions at the biochar–pore solution interface, subtly altering the local availability of calcium needed for calcium silicate hydrate growth. Spectroscopic data echoed this: acid-treated specimens showed a slight reduction in the Si–O band near 970 wavenumbers, hinting at modified silicate hydrate development around the particles. Notably, after 90 days of leaching, the 4 percent biochar pastes—both untreated and acid-treated—retained higher compressive strength than the 2 percent versions, suggesting that durability benefits persist even as cesium slowly diffuses out.</p>
<p>The authors are candid about the limits of the achievement. Even the best-performing mix lost 77 percent of its cesium over 90 days, a reminder that the diffusion barriers of ordinary Portland cement at a 0.5 water-to-cement ratio are modest compared with optimized high-pH belite-rich systems, where comparable tests have reported cumulative leached fractions of 19 to 38 percent. Still, the result falls within the range seen for challenging carbonated low-pH matrices, and the clear dosage-dependent benefit of acid-treated biochar points a way forward. By pairing engineered carbonaceous adsorbents with conventional cement chemistry, waste-form designers may gain a second, independent line of defense against one of nuclear waste&#8217;s most mobile radionuclides—one that works even when the cement&#8217;s own binding phases fall short.</p>
<p>The experimental design behind these findings deserves closer attention, because it reflects a deliberate departure from how biochar is usually deployed in construction materials. Rather than substituting biochar for cement, the researchers added it on top of a fixed cement mass, keeping both the water-to-cement ratio and the cement content constant across all eleven specimen sets. This choice matters: replacement strategies confound the effect of the adsorbent with dilution of the binding phases, whereas mass-based addition allows untreated and acid-treated biochars to be compared at identical dosages under otherwise identical chemistry. Any differences in strength, porosity, or leaching can therefore be attributed to the biochar itself and its surface condition, though changes in solid volume and water demand must still be weighed when interpreting dosage effects.</p>
<p>The selection of nitric acid over alkali activation was likewise a considered decision rather than a matter of convenience. Alkaline treatments such as potassium hydroxide activation are known to carve out highly porous, defect-rich biochar surfaces that can accelerate cement hydration and improve long-term strength. However, such treatments leave residual potassium behind, and introducing extra alkali ions into a system already saturated with sodium, potassium, and calcium would muddy the competitive adsorption environment that governs cesium behavior in alkaline pore solution. Acid treatment, by contrast, strips away ash, carbonates, and other mineral impurities while oxidizing reactive carbon sites to form carboxyl and carbonyl groups—modifications aimed squarely at cation binding rather than at hydration kinetics.</p>
<p>The leaching methodology also shapes how the results should be read. The team employed a semi-dynamic leaching test extending to 90 days, in which cylindrical specimens are repeatedly exposed to successive batches of purified leachant with carefully controlled conductivity and organic carbon content to minimize ionic interference. Because the leachant is periodically refreshed, concentration gradients at the specimen surface are maintained, and the test approximates worst-case diffusion conditions rather than equilibrium-limited release. Cesium chloride dissolved directly in the mixing water served as a non-radioactive surrogate, a standard practice that preserves the ionic chemistry of the radionuclide without the handling burdens of active sources.</p>
<p>The cement itself was a Type I ordinary Portland cement produced domestically in South Korea and compliant with ASTM C150, with a mineral composition dominated by alite at roughly 69 percent and a Blaine fineness of 3300 square centimeters per gram. These conventional parameters anchor the study in everyday practice: the findings apply to the same class of cement already used at scale for waste solidification, not to exotic formulations. The rice husk feedstock is equally pragmatic, being an abundant agricultural residue whose pyrolysis at 600 degrees Celsius under oxygen-limited conditions yields a lightweight carbon material of roughly 55 percent carbon content.</p>
<p>What emerges is a framework in which biochar functions simultaneously as microstructural modifier and as an independent sink for cesium, complementing the calcium silicate hydrate mechanism that cement technologists have relied upon for decades. The dosage dependence observed here suggests that future optimization will need to balance adsorption capacity against the calcium-coordination effects that accompany stronger surface charge.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Nitric acid-modified rice husk biochar as a cesium-retention additive in cement-based radioactive waste solidification</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Impact of biochar surface modification on hydration, pore structure, and cesium retention in cement matrices</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wu, X., &amp; Jang, J. G. (2026). Impact of biochar surface modification on hydration, pore structure, and cesium retention in cement matrices. <em>Case Studies in Construction Materials, 25</em>, Article e06497. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06497" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06497</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06497" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06497</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> biochar, cesium immobilization, radioactive waste, cement, surface modification, nitric acid treatment, leaching, calcium silicate hydrate, Friedel&#x27;s salt, pore structure, compressive strength, rice husk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">192922</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
