<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>forest classification accuracy and validation &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/forest-classification-accuracy-and-validation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 21:52:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Sentinel-2 and Random Forest Map Seasonal Shifts in Forest Canopy</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/sentinel-2-and-random-forest-map-seasonal-shifts-in-forest-canopy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Porter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 21:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest canopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest classification accuracy and validation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest density categorization using remote sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Earth Engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Earth Engine forest change detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of monsoon seasons on forest structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning applications in forest remote sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDMI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDVI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDVI and moisture index in forest studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-monsoon and post-monsoon forest dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Random Forest classifier in forest analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seasonal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal forest canopy changes India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentinel-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sentinel-2 remote sensing forest canopy mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spectral indices for vegetation monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporal analysis of forest canopy shifts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildlife sanctuary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=344905</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Sentinel-2 and Random Forest study mapped substantial seasonal and interannual redistribution of forest canopy density across Orchha Wildlife Sanctuary with classification accuracies of 97.80% to 98.95%.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forest canopy density within India’s Orchha Wildlife Sanctuary varied markedly between pre-monsoon and post-monsoon periods and between 2016 and 2024, according to a remote-sensing study that combined Sentinel-2 imagery, a Random Forest classifier and the Google Earth Engine platform. The researchers divided mapped canopy into four categories—non-forest, open, moderate and dense—and found that the overall classification accuracy ranged from 97.80% to 98.95%, with Kappa coefficients between 0.970 and 0.986.</p>
<p>The analysis assessed imagery from March–May, representing the pre-monsoon season, and October–December, representing the post-monsoon season, for two years. Its machine-learning framework used spectral indices derived from Sentinel-2 data, including the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and Normalized Difference Moisture Index, alongside elevation, slope and gray-level co-occurrence matrix texture features. The same Random Forest procedure was applied independently to all four season-year datasets, with reference samples balanced across NDVI-informed canopy-density strata.</p>
<p>Pre-monsoon comparisons showed a pronounced redistribution among the mapped classes. From 2016 to 2024, the areas assigned to non-forest and open canopy decreased by 39.62% and 7.15%, respectively. At the same time, mapped moderate and dense canopy increased by 231.64% and 240.43%. The post-monsoon pattern differed: moderate canopy increased by 26.01%, while dense canopy declined by 9.46%. These results describe changes in classes produced by the classification workflow, rather than direct measurements of biological canopy growth or loss.</p>
<p>Transition analysis within a common comparison area of 4,533.54 hectares also revealed substantial persistence in canopy-density classes alongside movement between neighboring categories. The researchers reported particularly notable redistribution from open to moderate canopy and from dense to moderate canopy. Spatial changes occurred in riparian, interior and peripheral portions of the sanctuary, indicating that mapped canopy differences were not confined to a single landscape zone. Overall, the study demonstrates how repeated satellite observations and machine-learning classification can provide a replicable means of comparing seasonal and interannual patterns across a protected landscape.</p>
<p>The authors cautioned that the two years were represented by different Sentinel-2 product levels: 2016 imagery came from Level-1C top-of-atmosphere data, whereas 2024 imagery came from Level-2A surface-reflectance products. The interannual differences should therefore be interpreted as changes in mapped canopy-density classes, not as precise biophysical changes in canopy structure. Despite this limitation, the framework offers a way to examine where seasonal and longer-term canopy redistribution appears most pronounced and to support spatially targeted monitoring and conservation planning in Orchha Wildlife Sanctuary.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Remote-sensing assessment of seasonal and interannual forest canopy-density changes in Orchha Wildlife Sanctuary, India</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Monitoring seasonal and long-term forest canopy dynamics using Sentinel-2 imagery and Random Forest on the Google Earth Engine platform</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kumar, P., Kumar, R., Sahu, S., Dobriyal, M., Lavania, P., Srivastav, M., Pandey, P. C., &amp; Turyasingura, B. (2026). Monitoring seasonal and long-term forest canopy dynamics using Sentinel-2 imagery and Random Forest on the Google Earth Engine platform. <em>PLOS One, 21</em>(10), e0361024. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361024" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361024</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361024" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1371/journal.pone.0361024</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Sentinel-2, Google Earth Engine, Random Forest, forest canopy, NDVI, NDMI, remote sensing, seasonal monitoring, wildlife sanctuary, machine learning, Monitoring, seasonal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">344905</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
