<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>field trial &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/field-trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:59:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Higher maize density linked to weaker grain filling in apical grains</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/higher-maize-density-linked-to-weaker-grain-filling-in-apical-grains/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 16:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apical vs basal grain development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ear position]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of high planting density on maize yield components]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grain filling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grain filling physiology in maize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grain position-related differences in maize kernel development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heilongjiang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of planting density on starch accumulation rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications for maize crop management and yield optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of plant density on early sugar supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maize hybrid response to planting density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maize hybrids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maize planting density effects on grain filling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planting density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starch accumulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starch biosynthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starch biosynthesis enzyme activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sucrose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugar availability during grain filling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[variations in starch biosynthesis enzymes in maize grains]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=320134</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A two-year Heilongjiang field trial associated higher maize planting density with lower early sugar supply, starch-biosynthetic enzyme activity, and starch accumulation, especially in apical grains.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A two-year field trial in Heilongjiang Province, China, found that increasing maize planting density generally reduced early sugar availability, the measured activity of key starch-biosynthetic enzymes, and the potential and rate of starch accumulation during grain filling. The reductions were more pronounced in apical grains—the kernels toward the top of the ear—than in basal-middle grains. The study tested three maize hybrids at three densities: D1, 82,500 plants per hectare; D2, 93,800 plants per hectare; and D3, 105,000 plants per hectare.</p>
<p>Researchers separated grains according to their position on the ear and measured sucrose and soluble-sugar levels during early grain filling. They also assessed the activities of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, starch synthase, and starch branching enzyme, then tracked starch accumulation through the filling period and recorded harvest-stage traits. Across planting densities and cultivars, basal-middle grains consistently had higher early sugar supply, higher activities of these three enzymes, and stronger starch accumulation than apical grains. The results therefore identified a consistent difference in grain-filling physiology between the two ear-position groups.</p>
<p>Planting density mainly changed the intensity of starch accumulation rather than its timing. Logistic analysis indicated that higher density reduced the intensity of the accumulation process without markedly shifting its temporal pattern. In practical terms, the measured starch-accumulation curve was not evidence of a radically different filling schedule; instead, grain-filling strength declined as planting density increased. This distinction came from the statistical analysis of the trial data and does not imply that the tested densities produced identical crop development in every respect.</p>
<p>The trial also linked several stages of the grain-filling process. Piecewise structural equation modeling showed close associations among early sugar supply, starch-biosynthetic enzyme activity, starch-accumulation kinetics, and traits recorded at harvest. Together with the field measurements, these results support a physiological explanation in which dense planting is associated with coordinated reductions in early sugar availability and starch-biosynthetic capacity. The structural model identifies relationships among those variables; it does not by itself establish that every modeled link is causal.</p>
<p>Responses differed among the three hybrids, and the authors associated tolerance to higher planting density with the maintenance of grain-filling physiology across ear positions. The supplied findings do not provide a universal ranking of the hybrids or demonstrate that any one cultivar produced a specific yield advantage. The experiment was a field-based physiological study conducted at one location over two years, with three hybrids and three density levels, so its scope is narrower than a comparison across regions, seasons, or management systems. The activity-based enzyme measurements should also not be read as a direct inventory of every metabolic pathway involved in grain filling. Within this trial, however, the evidence consistently associates higher planting density with lower early sugar supply, reduced starch-biosynthetic enzyme activity, and weaker starch accumulation, with apical grains showing the stronger response.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of maize planting density on grain filling, starch accumulation, and harvest traits at different ear positions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Effects of increased planting density on carbon metabolism, starch accumulation, and yield formation of maize grains at different ear positions</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kong, D., Kong, L., Zhang, X., Li, X., Zheng, S., Li, W., Duan, Z., Sun, Y., Sun, H., &amp; Guo, W. (2026). Effects of increased planting density on carbon metabolism, starch accumulation, and yield formation of maize grains at different ear positions. <em>BMC Plant Biology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09795-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09795-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-026-09795-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s12870-026-09795-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> maize, planting density, grain filling, starch accumulation, ear position, sucrose, starch biosynthesis, field trial, Heilongjiang, maize hybrids, Effects, increased</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">320134</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deadly Moth Meets Its Match in Mountain Plants as Botanical Spray Rivals Top Insecticide</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/deadly-moth-meets-its-match-in-mountain-plants-as-botanical-spray-rivals-top-insecticide/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 18:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antifeedant activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atropa belladonna]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biopesticides from Qinling Mountain plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blumea riparia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botanical insecticide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botanical sprays versus conventional insecticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-resistance in pest management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cruciferous crop pest management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cruciferous vegetables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diamondback moth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diamondback moth resistance to insecticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emulsifiable concentrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of plant-derived insecticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnobotanical bioprospecting for pest control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insecticide resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated pest management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural insecticide development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overcoming insecticide resistance in agricultural pests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant extracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant extracts for insecticide formulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-based pest control solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plutella xylostella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable pest management strategies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=276862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ethanol extracts of two Qinling Mountain plants, Atropa belladonna and Blumea riparia var. megacephala, were combined into a stable botanical emulsifiable concentrate that matched emamectin benzoate in field trials against the resistant diamondback moth.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella, is arguably the world&#8217;s most stubborn vegetable pest. A small, highly migratory lepidopteran that feeds almost exclusively on cruciferous crops such as cabbage, it has been chewing through harvests on every continent for decades, and its talent for evolving resistance is legendary. Since resistance to DDT was first documented in 1950, the moth has overcome nearly one hundred insecticides spanning organophosphates, amidinourea derivatives, oxadiazines and more. In China, resistance has been reported for more than ninety percent of the insecticides used against it, often accompanied by cross-resistance that renders entire chemical classes unreliable. Against this backdrop, a team of Chinese and Bahamian researchers has now taken a fresh look at an old idea: turning plants themselves into weapons. Their study, published in Acta Biochimica Polonica, screened ethanol extracts of fifteen plant species from the Qinling Mountains and advanced the two most promising candidates all the way into a field-ready formulation.</p>
<p>The research began with a systematic bioprospecting exercise. Fifteen species were selected from the Qinling Mountains on the basis of local abundance and regional representativeness, ranging from familiar solanaceous herbs to Allium species, legumes and Asteraceae shrubs. Plant material was rinsed, air-dried, oven-dried at 45 degrees Celsius, ground and sieved before being extracted with ninety-five percent ethanol at a solid-to-liquid ratio of one to four for forty-eight hours, with the process repeated twice on the residue. The combined filtrates were concentrated on a rotary evaporator to yield crude extracts, which were then dissolved into stock solutions and diluted to test concentrations. This simple but rigorous pipeline allowed the team to compare all fifteen species on an equal footing before committing resources to any single candidate.</p>
<p>Laboratory bioassays were built around three complementary measures of pest suppression: direct larvicidal toxicity, antifeedant activity and oviposition repellency. For the toxicity screen, five-centimeter cabbage leaf discs were dipped in each extract at fifty milligrams per milliliter, air-dried, and offered to twenty starved third-instar larvae per dish, with mortality scored at twenty-four, forty-eight and seventy-two hours. The results revealed striking interspecific differences and a clear time-dependent pattern. At twenty-four hours, Atropa belladonna extract already led the field with a corrected mortality of 58.87 percent, well ahead of Asparagus dauricus, Allium ochotense, Tupistra wattii and Blumea riparia var. megacephala. By seventy-two hours, A. belladonna had reached 83.11 percent, the only extract to break the eighty percent barrier, while B. riparia var. megacephala climbed to 73.53 percent. Ten of the fifteen extracts never exceeded fifty percent mortality, and Solanum nigrum was barely distinguishable from the ethanol control.</p>
<p>The behavioral assays told an equally compelling story. In the leaf-disc antifeedant test, smaller treated and untreated discs were offered to larvae, and consumed leaf area was measured after forty-eight hours. B. riparia var. megacephala and A. belladonna again dominated, with antifeedant rates of 87.45 and 89.46 percent respectively, meaning larvae ate only a small fraction of the foliage consumed by untreated controls. Extracts of A. ochotense, A. dauricus and Bauhinia championi also held rates above eighty percent, while several others faded over time. The oviposition assay extended the effect beyond feeding: potted Chinese cabbage plants sprayed with extract and caged with twenty adult moths received far fewer eggs than ethanol-treated controls. B. riparia var. megacephala reduced egg-laying by 82.14 percent, leaving just 1.25 eggs per plant, and A. belladonna achieved 78.57 percent repellency. Together, the data suggested these two plants attack the moth at multiple points in its life cycle.</p>
<p>With two standouts identified, the researchers asked whether combining them would improve performance. Eleven treatments were prepared in a volumetric series spanning pure A. belladonna to pure B. riparia var. megacephala, and the median lethal concentration of each was determined by probit analysis. Alone, A. belladonna showed an LC50 of 76.69 milligrams per milliliter against the more toxic B. riparia var. megacephala at 95.53. The critical result came from the eight-to-two mixture, which lowered the LC50 to 65.76 milligrams per milliliter, better than either single extract. Using the co-toxicity coefficient framework of Chinese pesticide standards, where values at or above 120 indicate synergism, at or below 80 indicate antagonism and values between indicate additivity, the eight-to-two blend scored 110. The authors are careful to call this an additive effect rather than true synergism, but the absence of any antagonistic combination, even at ratios where the weaker extract dominated, is a meaningful signal that the two extracts are chemically compatible partners.</p>
<p>Why might these particular plants be so potent? The team draws on phytochemical literature to build plausible, though deliberately tentative, mechanistic hypotheses. Atropa belladonna, the infamous deadly nightshade, is rich in tropane alkaloids including hyoscyamine, scopolamine and norhyoscyamine, compounds known to interact with insect muscarinic acetylcholine receptors and thereby disrupt cholinergic signaling and neural transmission. Blumea species, by contrast, produce sesquiterpene-rich volatile oils and diverse flavonoids, compound classes associated elsewhere with feeding deterrence, digestive enzyme inhibition and interference with detoxification enzymes. Allium ochotense owes its activity, if the pattern holds, to sulfur-containing compounds and steroidal saponins that can induce oxidative stress and permeate cell membranes. Because the study did not perform chemical profiling of the extracts, these explanations remain literature-supported hypotheses rather than demonstrated mechanisms, and the authors are explicit about that limitation.</p>
<p>Translating laboratory promise into a sprayable product required formulation chemistry. The combined eight-to-two extract was tested against four organic solvents, and ethanol was chosen over dimethyl sulfoxide and methanol for its lower toxicity and favorable stability, while petroleum ether failed solubility requirements outright. Four surfactant systems were then screened. Formulations containing pesticide emulsifier 500# combined with NP-2 remained homogeneous and transparent through high-temperature storage at 54 degrees Celsius for fourteen days, low-temperature storage near freezing for a week, and dilution testing, whereas OP-10 and emulsifier 601# showed precipitation under stress. Concentration optimization settled on five percent emulsifier 500# and eight percent NP-2. The final emulsifiable concentrate contained ten percent active ingredients, seventy-seven percent ethanol and the two emulsifiers, and it passed the physicochemical stability benchmarks, though the authors caution that these accelerated tests are not a substitute for a full shelf-life evaluation.</p>
<p>The decisive test came in the field. In a randomized complete block trial on cruciferous vegetables in Jingyang County, the ten percent botanical formulation diluted one hundred times was compared with emamectin benzoate, a widely used macrocyclic lactone insecticide, and a water-sprayed control across twelve plots. The pattern of action differed sharply between treatments. Emamectin benzoate, which paralyzes insects by acting on glutamate-gated chloride channels, showed faster knockdown in the first day. The botanical spray started slowly, delivering only 10.86 percent control at day one, but its performance climbed steadily as its toxic, antifeedant and reproductive effects accumulated. By seven days after application, the botanical formulation had achieved 58.35 percent control, statistically indistinguishable from the 60.58 percent achieved by emamectin benzoate. Meanwhile, the untreated plots saw larval populations surge by more than thirty percent, underscoring how much pressure the pest exerts when left alone.</p>
<p>The researchers and outside observers alike stress that 58.35 percent is moderate efficacy, not commercial-grade knockout, and the trial covered a single site and one growing season. But the trajectory is what makes the study noteworthy: a crude plant combination, formulated without synthetic active ingredients, matching a leading chemical insecticide within a week of application suggests genuine development potential rather than a laboratory curiosity. The authors outline the road ahead with commendable candor. Chemical profiling by LC-MS or GC-MS and bioassay-guided fractionation are needed to identify the actual active constituents. Safety evaluation is not optional, because natural origin does not equal safety: A. belladonna&#8217;s tropane alkaloids can pose risks to humans, livestock and beneficial insects at sufficient exposure, so mammalian toxicity, non-target effects, residues and environmental fate all require dedicated study. Resistance management potential, multi-location trials and dosage optimization round out the agenda. If those hurdles are cleared, the Qinling Mountains may have supplied an unlikely gift to cabbage growers worldwide: a plant-based spray that the diamondback moth has not yet learned to beat.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Botanical insecticide screening and field evaluation against the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Bioactivity screening of plant ethanol extracts against Plutella xylostella and field evaluation of an optimized botanical combination formulation</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zhang, J., Wang, X., Xu, X., Gustave, W., &amp; Zhang, X. (2026). Bioactivity screening of plant ethanol extracts against Plutella xylostella and field evaluation of an optimized botanical combination formulation. <em>Acta Biochimica Polonica, 73</em>, Article 16918. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/abp.2026.16918" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3389/abp.2026.16918</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/abp.2026.16918" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3389/abp.2026.16918</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Plutella xylostella, diamondback moth, botanical insecticide, Atropa belladonna, Blumea riparia, plant extracts, antifeedant activity, insecticide resistance, emulsifiable concentrate, integrated pest management, field trial, cruciferous vegetables</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">276862</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biochar-Coated Urea Boosts Maize Yields and Slashes Nitrogen Waste in Field Trial</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/biochar-coated-urea-boosts-maize-yields-and-slashes-nitrogen-waste-in-field-trial/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 14:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biochar soil amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biochar-coated urea for enhanced maize yield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly farming innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhanced-efficiency fertilizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field trials on biochar and urea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of biochar on soil chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving fertilizer microsite chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitigating environmental impacts of nitrogen fertilizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen fertilizer efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen leaching and volatilization reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen use efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen use efficiency in crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pyrolysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reduction of nitrogen losses in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slow-release fertilizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable fertilizer practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urea]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=244769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A field trial in Bangladesh found that urea coated with biologically activated biochar raised maize grain yield to 9.84 tonnes per hectare and nitrogen use efficiency to 74.4 percent, far outperforming conventional urea.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitrogen fertilizer is both the engine of modern agriculture and one of its most wasteful inputs. Crops typically acquire only about 35 percent of the nitrogen applied as urea, with the rest escaping into air and water through ammonia volatilization, leaching, and denitrification. In South Asia, losses of 40 to 70 percent of applied nitrogen are common, driving eutrophication, soil acidification, and a heavy carbon footprint. A new open-access field study published in Discover Plants by S. M. M. Alam, Shamim Mia, and colleagues at Patuakhali Science and Technology University in Bangladesh, together with collaborators in Australia and the Netherlands, reports that a simple change in fertilizer chemistry—wrapping urea granules in specially modified biochar—can dramatically close that gap.</p>
<p>The team&#8217;s central idea was to change the chemistry of the fertilizer microsite, the tiny zone of soil immediately surrounding each pellet where urea hydrolyzes within hours, pushing local pH above 8.5 and triggering ammonia losses. By coating or blending urea with biochars carrying a wide range of surface charges, the researchers aimed to slow nitrogen release and improve retention right where it matters. Biochar, a carbon-rich material produced by heating biomass in low-oxygen conditions, has long been studied as a soil amendment, but its properties vary enormously with feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, and post-production treatment. Rather than treating biochar as a single material, the team engineered four distinct versions and tested them head to head.</p>
<p>The biochars were produced from sawdust in a semi-airtight brick kiln, with temperatures climbing from 300 degrees Celsius at two hours to a peak of 807 degrees at 28 hours before declining. One batch was left pristine, with a nearly neutral surface charge of about minus 2.6 centimoles of charge per kilogram at pH 7.0. A second was chemically oxidized with hydrogen peroxide, which flooded the surface with carboxylic and phenolic functional groups and pushed the negative charge to minus 34.3 centimoles per kilogram. A third was biologically activated by inoculating it with microorganisms extracted from forest, agricultural, and pasture soils and incubating it for 15 days at alternating temperatures of 40 and 25 degrees. The fourth was pre-doped with iron, aluminum, and magnesium chlorides before pyrolysis, which impregnated the carbon matrix with metals and flipped the surface charge to slightly positive, around 1 centimole per kilogram, with a correspondingly tiny cation exchange capacity of about 2.4.</p>
<p>These four biochars were applied in two different architectures. In the coated formulations, urea granules were tumbled at 30 revolutions per minute with biochar, starch, and soybean oil at a urea-to-biochar ratio of 10:1, creating an external diffusion barrier around each pellet. In the blended formulations, biochar, fertilizer, and clay were physically mixed and pressed into new composite granules, so that nitrogen release depended on internal pore connectivity rather than an outer shell. Potassium nitrate was also blended with pristine and metal-doped biochars, and urea was blended with coal as an additional comparison. Because blending dilutes the nutrient content—the coated fertilizers contained roughly 40 percent nitrogen while the blends held only about 2.5 percent—application rates were adjusted so that every treatment delivered the same nutrient supply.</p>
<p>The field trial took place at the Agronomy Field of Patuakhali Science and Technology University in Dumki, Bangladesh, from January to May 2023, on a slightly alkaline silty clay loam with very low organic carbon of 0.98 percent and total nitrogen of just 0.05 percent. Twelve treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications, spanning the biochar formulations, neem-coated urea, guti-urea (urea super granules), conventional prilled urea, and an unfertilized control. The hybrid maize variety Bahubali-881 was sown at 25 centimeters within rows spaced 60 centimeters apart, and nitrogen was split three ways: at land preparation, 40 days after sowing, and 75 days after sowing, just before flowering.</p>
<p>The standout result came from urea coated with biologically activated biochar. This treatment produced the highest grain yield of the entire experiment, 9.84 tonnes per hectare, a 174 percent increase over the unfertilized control&#8217;s 3.58 tonnes and a 29 percent increase over conventional urea&#8217;s 7.63 tonnes. The same plots produced the tallest plants at 202.73 centimeters, the longest cobs at 19.12 centimeters, the most grains per cob at roughly 590, the heaviest 1000-grain weight at 332.7 grams, and the highest SPAD chlorophyll reading at 54.7. Root biomass reached 3.81 tonnes per hectare, and straw yield peaked at 7.78 tonnes per hectare. Most strikingly, nitrogen use efficiency hit 74.4 percent, compared with just 47.6 percent for conventional urea—meaning nearly three-quarters of the applied nitrogen ended up in the crop rather than the environment.</p>
<p>The efficiency metrics told a consistent story across the board. The researchers calculated not only overall nitrogen use efficiency but also agronomic efficiency, the yield gain per unit of nitrogen applied; physiological efficiency, how well plant nitrogen converts into grain; and apparent recovery efficiency, the fraction of applied nitrogen recovered in plant tissue. The biologically activated biochar-coated urea led every index. Chemically oxidized biochar coatings and iron-aluminum-magnesium pre-doped coatings also matched or beat conventional urea and the commercial enhanced-efficiency products, neem-coated urea and guti-urea. When results were pooled by formulation type, coated fertilizers averaged 9.43 tonnes per hectare of grain and 65.32 percent nitrogen use efficiency, outperforming blended formulations, and oxidized biochar types averaged 9.78 tonnes per hectare and 69.3 percent efficiency.</p>
<p>Intriguingly, the soil itself offered few clues to the yield differences. Measurements of pH, ammonium nitrogen, and nitrate nitrogen during the growing season showed no statistically significant differences among treatments, and post-harvest analysis found most nutrients unchanged, with the notable exception of potassium, which was highest where potassium nitrate had been blended with biochar. Soil organic matter did vary, rising in several biochar-blended treatments. The authors attribute the modest soil effects to the small quantities of biochar applied, suggesting that the fertilizers&#8217; benefits occurred locally around each pellet rather than across the bulk soil. Grain nutrient composition likewise remained stable, with no significant differences in micronutrients such as iron, zinc, and manganese, indicating that the yield gains came without sacrificing nutritional quality.</p>
<p>Multivariate statistics sharpened this interpretation. Pearson correlation analysis showed grain yield strongly and positively linked to plant traits—straw yield, grains per cob, root biomass, cob length, plant height, and 1000-grain weight—with correlation coefficients between 0.78 and 0.96, while residual soil nitrate after harvest correlated only weakly at 0.38. Redundancy analysis separated yield-related plant traits from soil nutrient variables along the first ordination axis, confirming that variation in harvest-time soil chemistry did not explain treatment performance. The authors are careful to note that mechanisms such as slower nitrogen release and improved synchronization between nitrogen supply and crop demand remain plausible explanations drawn from prior literature rather than processes directly measured in this study; urease activity and nitrogen transformation pathways were not evaluated.</p>
<p>Even with those caveats, the practical implications are substantial. Biologically activated biochar-coated urea is built from sawdust waste, soil microbes, starch, and soybean oil—no synthetic polymer coatings that linger in soil—making it an attractive candidate for smallholder maize farmers in Bangladesh and beyond, where yields still fall short of the regional irrigated potential of roughly 12.3 to 13.8 tonnes per hectare. The authors call for direct quantification of nitrogen release dynamics and loss pathways, along with validation across multiple seasons, locations, and economic conditions before large-scale adoption. If those follow-up studies hold up, a coating of microbe-conditioned charcoal could become one of the cheapest levers available for feeding more people while wasting less of the nitrogen that modern farming depends on.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Biochar-coated and blended nitrogen fertilizers for improving maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Role of biochar coated and blended nitrogen fertilizers on maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Alam, S. M., Mia, S., Saha, G., Masud, M. M., Al-Amin, M., Mim, M. J., Islam, M. M., &amp; Jindo, K. (2026). Role of biochar coated and blended nitrogen fertilizers on maize yield and nitrogen use efficiency. <em>Discover Plants, 3</em>(1), Article 372. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00835-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00835-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00835-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44372-026-00835-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> biochar, urea, nitrogen use efficiency, maize, slow-release fertilizer, soil chemistry, Bangladesh, agronomy, sustainable agriculture, pyrolysis, enhanced-efficiency fertilizer, field trial</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">244769</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neem Oil Tops Field Trials Against Cardamom Caterpillar in Nepal, but Mineral Oil Wins in the Lab</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/neem-oil-tops-field-trials-against-cardamom-caterpillar-in-nepal-but-mineral-oil-wins-in-the-lab/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 11:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artemisia vulgaris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artona chorista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botanical insecticides for cardamom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[botanical pesticide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardamom crop protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cardamom pest control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cow-dung urine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Himalayan spice cultivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of pest on high-altitude crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insect pest trials in Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated pest management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laboratory bioassay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large cardamom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mineral oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural pest control methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neem oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-synthetic insect control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic pest management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pest management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smallholder spice farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture in Nepal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=237736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A field and laboratory study in eastern Nepal found neem oil gave the strongest suppression of the leaf-eating caterpillar Artona chorista in large cardamom, while mineral oil caused the highest mortality under controlled conditions, revealing why lab results alone cannot predict field performance.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High in the eastern Himalayas, large cardamom is more than a spice. For thousands of smallholder families across Nepal, India, and Bhutan, the shade-loving perennial is a lifeline crop, generating cash income and export earnings from steep, humid slopes where few other high-value crops thrive. Yet production has been slipping for decades, battered by aging plantations, erratic weather, disease, and a persistent roster of insect pests. Among the most damaging of these is the leaf-eating caterpillar Artona chorista, a small zygaenid moth whose larvae can strip a cardamom clump of its foliage with alarming speed. A new study from Taplejung district in eastern Nepal now offers farmers and researchers a carefully quantified comparison of four non-synthetic treatments against this pest, and its results carry a lesson that reaches well beyond cardamom fields.</p>
<p>The research, conducted by a team affiliated with Tribhuvan University, Fort Valley State University, and the Prime Minister Agriculture Modernization Project, evaluated neem oil, horticultural mineral oil, titepati (Artemisia vulgaris) oil, and a fermented cow-dung urine preparation against naturally infested cardamom plants. The work was carried out between March and May 2023 in a farmer-managed plantation of the Ramsey cultivar at 1,541 meters above sea level, a setting typical of the eastern Himalayan cardamom agroecosystem. Crucially, the investigators ran two parallel experiments: a randomized complete block design in the field and a completely randomized laboratory bioassay, allowing them to compare how the same treatments behaved under natural and controlled conditions.</p>
<p>The pest itself is a formidable adversary. Female Artona chorista moths lay eggs in clusters on the underside of cardamom leaves, and after roughly thirteen days the larvae emerge to begin a seven-instar development spanning nearly fifty-nine days. Early instars feed gregariously on the lower leaf surface, consuming the mesophyll while leaving the epidermis intact and producing a characteristic papery skeletonization. Later instars become far more destructive, often devouring the entire leaf blade down to the midrib and slashing the plant&#8217;s photosynthetic capacity. With a total egg-to-adult development period approaching one hundred days and multiple seasonal population peaks, the caterpillar can build up rapidly when conditions favor it, which is precisely what happened in the experimental field during the spring infestation window.</p>
<p>In the field trial, each treatment was applied three times at seven-day intervals using a knapsack sprayer, with larval populations counted on tagged clumps before spraying and at two, five, and six days after each application. The results were striking. Neem oil at 2.5 milliliters per liter delivered the numerically greatest suppression, cutting mean larval density from 180.1 to just 3.4 live larvae per sampled clump, a 98.1 percent reduction relative to the pre-treatment baseline. Mineral oil at 10 milliliters per liter ranked second with an 86.3 percent reduction, followed by titepati oil at 79.6 percent and the cow-dung urine extract at 65.5 percent. Meanwhile, larval populations in the untreated control plots surged by 88.3 percent over the same period, climbing from 143.1 to 269.4 larvae per clump and illustrating just how explosive unmanaged infestations can become.</p>
<p>The laboratory bioassay told a different story. Third-instar larvae were confined in rearing jars with cardamom leaves dipped in the same treatment concentrations, and mortality was assessed across three spray cycles. Here, mineral oil dominated, killing 98.5 percent of larvae by raw count, or 98.3 percent after Abbott&#8217;s correction for the 10 percent background mortality observed in controls. Neem oil came second at 87.5 percent raw mortality, followed by titepati oil at 70.0 percent and cow-dung urine at 42.5 percent. By the final observation, the five treatments occupied five distinct statistical groupings, meaning every treatment differed significantly from every other. Mineral oil also produced the fastest knockdown, driving live larval counts to a quarter of a larva per jar or less within six days of each application.</p>
<p>The reversal in ranking between the two settings is the study&#8217;s most intriguing finding, and the authors attribute it to fundamental differences in how these materials kill insects. Neem oil owes its activity primarily to azadirachtin and related limonoid compounds, which act as antifeedants, repellents, growth regulators, and disruptors of molting and metamorphosis. These effects are slow-acting and cumulative, becoming more pronounced as larvae continue feeding on treated foliage over days and weeks. In the field, where larvae remained exposed to treated leaves between spray cycles, that prolonged exposure appears to have allowed neem&#8217;s sublethal effects to accumulate, driving the progressive population decline observed across successive sprays.</p>
<p>Mineral oil, by contrast, works through brute physical force. Horticultural oils suffocate insects by coating the body and blocking the spiracles, the tiny openings through which insects breathe. This contact mechanism depends entirely on the oil film actually reaching the pest, which is far easier to guarantee in a rearing jar than in a shaded, sloping cardamom plantation. Under field conditions, rainfall, ultraviolet degradation, leaf curvature, canopy structure, and the habit of larvae clustering on leaf undersides all conspire to reduce direct contact, plausibly explaining why mineral oil&#8217;s laboratory dominance did not translate into field leadership.</p>
<p>The two traditional treatments performed more modestly in both settings. Titepati oil, prepared by local farmers and applied at 0.5 milliliters per liter, achieved intermediate suppression consistent with the insecticidal, repellent, and fumigant properties of the terpenoid compounds found in Artemisia essential oils. The fermented cow-dung urine extract, a preparation known locally as Jholmol and long used by eastern Himalayan farmers for combined pest suppression and soil fertility, showed the weakest activity, though it still reduced larval populations significantly compared with the control. The authors note that variability in the composition of traditionally prepared formulations and limited residual effect may account for its lower performance, and they emphasize that indigenous practices deserve rigorous scientific evaluation before being recommended as standalone controls.</p>
<p>The study is candid about its limitations. At the final field observation, the four active treatments differed significantly from the untreated control but not from one another, so the field ranking is numerical rather than statistically confirmed. Relatively high coefficients of variation at some field dates reflect the naturally aggregated distribution of the larvae and the inherent heterogeneity of a fifty-year-old farmer-managed agroforestry system. The field and laboratory experiments were also analyzed separately and on different efficacy scales, so the contrast between settings was described rather than formally tested. No yield data, cost-benefit analysis, economic thresholds, or non-target safety assessments were included, meaning the findings speak to larval suppression alone rather than to complete farmer-level recommendations.</p>
<p>Even with those caveats, the combined field-laboratory approach yields practical guidance. Neem oil emerges as a promising botanical option for suppressing Artona chorista under real-world conditions, particularly where organic or low-residue production is the goal, though applications should avoid flowering periods to protect pollinators such as the bumblebee Bombus haemorrhoidalis. Mineral oil merits consideration as a rotational or supplementary treatment where rapid knockdown is needed and thorough spray coverage can be achieved. Titepati oil may serve as a supplementary botanical tool during moderate infestations, while cow-dung urine requires further evidence before standalone use. More broadly, the work delivers a methodological message for pest management everywhere: laboratory toxicity alone cannot predict field performance, and only by testing treatments under both controlled and farmer-managed conditions can researchers build recommendations that actually work on the mountain slopes where the crop, and the caterpillar, live.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Comparative efficacy of botanical and mineral-based treatments against the leaf-eating caterpillar Artona chorista in large cardamom in eastern Nepal</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Comparative field and laboratory efficacy of botanical and mineral-based treatments against Artona chorista in large cardamom in eastern Nepal</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Lamichhane, P., Adhikari, J., Bhattarai, P., &amp; Yogi, L. N. (2026). Comparative field and laboratory efficacy of botanical and mineral-based treatments against Artona chorista in large cardamom in eastern Nepal. <em>Discover Agriculture, 4</em>(1), Article 311. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-026-00788-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-026-00788-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-026-00788-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44279-026-00788-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> large cardamom, Artona chorista, neem oil, mineral oil, botanical pesticide, Artemisia vulgaris, cow-dung urine, Nepal, pest management, field trial, laboratory bioassay, integrated pest management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">237736</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ribosomal RNA Passes Its Test as a Steady Reference in High-Throughput Plasma qPCR</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ribosomal-rna-passes-its-test-as-a-steady-reference-in-high-throughput-plasma-qpcr/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 06:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18S rRNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18S rRNA as a normalization control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomarker normalization in plasma samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biomarkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bland-Altman analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endogenous control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene expression normalisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-throughput qPCR in diabetes research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of internal controls on qPCR accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular biology methods for circulating RNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenArray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasma RNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasma RNA quantification in clinical trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-amplification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qPCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reference gene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reference gene validation in high-throughput RNA analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ribosomal RNA stability in plasma qPCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stability assessment of housekeeping genes in plasma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systematic evaluation of reference genes in clinical genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TaqMan OpenArray platform for blood-based gene expression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical validation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=237060</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A large analysis of FIELD trial plasma samples shows that 18 S rRNA is a technically stable qPCR control that does not bias co-amplified targets during multiplex pre-amplification, though archived and new primer pools differ enough to warrant caution in longitudinal studies.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every quantitative PCR experiment lives or dies by its reference gene. The technique can measure nucleic acids with exquisite sensitivity, but only if the measurements can be anchored to something that does not itself waver between samples. For decades, molecular biologists have leaned on housekeeping genes and ribosomal RNAs to serve as these internal anchors, yet the field has repeatedly learned that no control gene is universally stable. A new study published in Molecular Biology Reports now offers one of the most systematic assessments to date of 18 S ribosomal RNA, the workhorse control of countless qPCR experiments, in a setting that is notoriously unforgiving: high-throughput, pre-amplified RNA measured from human blood plasma on the TaqMan OpenArray platform.</p>
<p>The research, led by Habib Francis of the Sydney Clinical Trials Centre at The University of Sydney together with colleagues across Australia, Hong Kong and India, drew on plasma samples from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial, a landmark randomised controlled trial of nearly 10,000 adults with type 2 diabetes. Because the samples came from a large, well-characterised clinical cohort, the team could interrogate the behaviour of 18 S rRNA across hundreds of real biobanked specimens rather than a handful of laboratory controls. In total, 789 plasma RNA samples analysed across 17 separate OpenArray runs formed the backbone of the stability assessment, giving the study a statistical weight that most reference-gene validations never approach.</p>
<p>The technical challenge the authors set out to resolve is a genuine worry in multiplexed qPCR. Microfluidic OpenArray plates pack thousands of nanolitre-scale reactions onto a single plate, and the tiny input of plasma RNA, which is naturally dilute and dominated by fragmented extracellular species, usually forces a pre-amplification step. During those 14 cycles of targeted pre-amplification, all the primer pairs in the pool compete for the same enzymes, nucleotides and reaction space. Highly abundant transcripts such as 18 S rRNA, which can be present at levels orders of magnitude above the messenger RNA targets of interest, could in theory monopolise shared reagents and quietly suppress the amplification of scarcer targets. If that happened, Ct values would shift in ways that no amount of normalisation could correct, corrupting every downstream comparison.</p>
<p>To test this directly, the researchers ran a paired experiment on 23 plasma samples. Each sample was pre-amplified twice, once with a primer pool containing the 18 S rRNA assay and once with an otherwise equivalent pool lacking it. The team then measured four representative target genes, ACTG1, ACTB, CLU and PFN1, under both conditions and compared the raw cycle threshold values sample by sample. Because not every gene was detectable in every sample, the effective sample sizes ranged from eight to seventeen per assay, a limitation the authors acknowledge candidly. Even so, the paired design is the cleanest possible way to isolate the effect of a single primer from all other sources of variation.</p>
<p>The verdict was reassuring. Median paired Ct differences between the two pre-amplification conditions ranged from just 0.07 to 0.52 cycles, and none of the four targets showed a statistically significant shift, with all p-values exceeding 0.05. Bland–Altman analysis, which plots the difference between paired measurements against their average, confirmed the picture: the mean bias across all four genes combined was a negligible −0.18 Ct, and the data points for each gene were distributed similarly, mostly falling within the 95 percent limits of agreement. In plain terms, adding 18 S rRNA to the pre-amplification pool did not measurably distort the amplification of the co-amplified messenger RNA targets under the conditions tested. The feared competition effect, at least in this workflow, did not materialise.</p>
<p>The stability data were equally encouraging. Across the 789 samples and 17 runs, 18 S rRNA was consistently detectable, with a median Ct of 14.5 and an interquartile range of 13.4 to 16.3. The distribution of Ct values was unimodal, clustering tightly around the median without the bimodality or systematic shifts that would hint at batch effects or hidden technical artefacts. Inter-run variability was low, with a coefficient of variation of just 3.9 percent and no significant differences between runs. Notably, these results were obtained using archived plasma samples that had endured three freeze–thaw cycles, conditions typical of longitudinal clinical biobanking, suggesting that 18 S rRNA detection remains technically robust even when samples have been handled the way real-world studies demand.</p>
<p>The study also tackled a practical problem that haunts long-running biomarker projects: what happens when a primer pool runs out? The FIELD analyses had relied on an archived pre-amplification pool containing the 18 S rRNA assay, stored unopened at −80 °C for more than five years. The researchers compared 18 S rRNA Ct values in 774 paired plasma samples amplified with either that archived pool or a newly manufactured one. Amplification succeeded under both conditions, but the new pool produced slightly lower Ct values, a statistically significant shift with a mean bias of 0.53 Ct. More concerning was the spread: the standard deviation of paired differences was 3.82 Ct, with 95 percent limits of agreement stretching from −6.95 to 8.01 Ct, and variability appeared to widen at higher average Ct values, where template abundance is lowest.</p>
<p>That combination of a small average bias and wide individual-level variability carries an important lesson for anyone managing longitudinal studies. The authors conclude that data generated with archived and new primer pools remain broadly comparable at the group level, but the two pools should not be treated as directly interchangeable for individual paired measurements. They recommend practical safeguards: keeping detailed records of primer sequences, concentrations and manufacturing lots; running bridging experiments on a representative subset of samples whenever a pool must be replaced; and using paired comparisons with Bland–Altman analysis to quantify any systematic bias before transitioning. Where the bias is small and consistent, calibration may suffice; where variability is large, reanalysis with a common pool or an alternative validated assay may be the only defensible option.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to frame what this study does and does not prove. Their findings establish the technical performance of 18 S rRNA within plasma-based OpenArray workflows, not its biological stability across disease states or experimental conditions, and they cannot be assumed to extend to other sample types, platforms or pre-amplification chemistries. Plasma is a peculiar analytical matrix, rich in fragmented extracellular RNA and poor in total messenger RNA, and pre-analytical variables such as blood collection tube type can reshape extracellular RNA profiles entirely. Still, by combining large-scale stability assessment, paired technical comparisons and a real-world test of reagent longevity, the study offers a template for validating endogenous controls in any high-throughput qPCR setting, and it gives biomarker researchers working with scarce clinical plasma a solid reason to trust one of molecular biology&#8217;s oldest internal controls.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Validation of 18 S rRNA as an endogenous control gene in high-throughput plasma RNA qPCR workflows</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Evaluation of 18 S rRNA as an endogenous control in OpenArray® plasma RNA qPCR workflows</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Francis, H., Januszewski, A. S., Mangani, A., Ema, F. K., Hardikar, A. A., Joglekar, M. V., Huang, M. L., Sullivan, D. R., Ma, R. C., Galande, S., Gebski, V., Simes, R. J., Jenkins, A. J., Molloy, M. P., &amp; Keech, A. C. (2026). Evaluation of 18 S rRNA as an endogenous control in OpenArray® plasma RNA qPCR workflows. <em>Molecular Biology Reports, 53</em>(1), Article 1641. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-026-12820-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-026-12820-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-026-12820-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11033-026-12820-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> qPCR, 18S rRNA, OpenArray, plasma RNA, endogenous control, pre-amplification, reference gene, Bland-Altman analysis, FIELD trial, biomarkers, gene expression normalisation, technical validation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">237060</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bigger Pots Are Not Always Better: Six-Year Trial Reveals How Nursery Choices Shape Silky Oak Success in Ethiopia</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/bigger-pots-are-not-always-better-six-year-trial-reveals-how-nursery-choices-shape-silky-oak-success-in-ethiopia/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 03:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agroforestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[containerized seedling survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early nursery variables influencing reforestation outcomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of seedling age on tree success]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethiopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest restoration challenges and solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grevillea robusta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grevillea robusta planting success]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term effects of nursery practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nursery management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nursery management for forest restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nursery pot size impact on tree growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pot size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reforestation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reforestation in Ethiopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root-to-shoot ratio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seedling age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silky oak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silky Oak seedling development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survival rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable forestry practices in Ethiopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree growth experiments in highland Ethiopia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=225366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A six-year Ethiopian field trial shows that pot size and seedling age significantly shape the nursery shoot growth and field root collar diameter of Grevillea robusta, with smaller pots and younger seedlings proving sufficient for successful establishment.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the degraded highlands of northern Ethiopia, the fate of a reforestation project can hinge on decisions made months before a single tree touches the soil. A new six-year field experiment from the Sirinka Agricultural Research Center suggests that two of the most overlooked nursery variables—pot size and seedling age—leave measurable fingerprints on one of the region&#8217;s most important plantation trees, Grevillea robusta, the silky oak. The study, conducted in the Habru District of the North Wollo Zone at roughly 1,850 meters above sea level, followed seedlings from the nursery bench through 74 months of growth in the field, offering one of the more complete pictures of how early container choices echo through a tree&#8217;s later life.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Andualem Ayalew Alemu and colleagues at the Amhara Agricultural Research Institute, set out to answer a deceptively simple question: does it matter whether a silky oak seedling spends four, five, or six months in the nursery, and whether it grows in an 8, 10, or 12 centimeter pot? The stakes are considerable. Ethiopia loses between 80,000 and 200,000 hectares of forest each year, driven by deforestation, poor land management, and the conversion of natural ecosystems into farmland. Grevillea robusta, an Australian native from the Proteaceae family, has become a workhorse of Ethiopian agroforestry, contributing an estimated 1.7 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalents annually and adding roughly 44 million Birr in net present value from sawn wood production.</p>
<p>The experiment was rigorous in design. Seeds were obtained from the licensed Ethiopian seed company Eden Seed Enterprise, cleaned of insect-damaged or rotten material, and stored at 4 degrees Celsius to prolong viability. Seedlings were raised in a standardized growing medium of forest soil, local soil, river sand, and decomposed animal manure mixed at a ratio of 3:2:1:1, then arranged in a factorial randomized complete block design with three replications. Nine treatment combinations crossed three pot sizes with three seedling ages, with 100 seedlings per treatment in the nursery. The 8-centimeter pot and 4-month seedling age combination served as the control, reflecting common nursery practice. Seedlings were watered twice daily, and destructive sampling of ten seedlings per treatment at each age allowed the team to measure root length, shoot length, and the root-to-shoot ratio.</p>
<p>The nursery results were telling. The interaction of pot size and seedling age had a statistically significant effect on shoot length, with several mid-range treatments producing markedly longer shoots than others, while root length and the root-to-shoot ratio showed no significant differences. The authors attribute the shoot response partly to the nitrogen-rich manure in the growing medium, which prior research suggests promotes shoot growth more strongly than root growth. Notably, the mean root-to-shoot ratio declined as seedlings aged in the nursery, from about 1.7 at four months to 1.98 at six months in the study&#8217;s measurements, a pattern consistent with the understanding that allocation between roots and shoots shifts as seedlings mature. The root-to-shoot ratio is widely regarded as a key indicator of a seedling&#8217;s ability to cope with resource scarcity after transplanting.</p>
<p>Then came the field phase, and with it, the long wait. Seedlings were planted at a spacing of 2 by 2 meters in 12-square-meter plots, six seedlings per plot, with treatments replicated across blocks separated by buffer strips. The team measured root collar diameter, diameter at breast height, height, and survival at three-month intervals, ultimately computing volume and mean annual increment using a form factor of 0.86 for tropical Grevillea plantations. After more than six years in the ground, the interaction of pot size and seedling age showed a significant effect on root collar diameter, while diameter at breast height, height, survival, volume, and mean annual increment did not differ significantly among treatments.</p>
<p>The absolute growth figures reveal both the promise and the constraints of the site. By 74 months after planting, the best-performing treatment had reached a diameter at breast height of 11.5 centimeters, while the slowest stood at 8.5 centimeters, yielding a mean annual diameter increment of 1.7 centimeters per year. Mean height ranged from 6.8 to 7.6 meters. These numbers fall short of benchmarks from more favorable environments: trees in south-eastern Queensland, with comparable rainfall, reached a mean diameter of 16.7 centimeters and a height of 8.9 meters at six years, while Indian plantations have recorded annual diameter increments of 2 centimeters in their first five years. The researchers point to the study area&#8217;s modest 945 millimeters of annual rainfall and its long dry season as likely explanations, though the clay-to-clay loam soils, with a pH of 6.4, are considered well suited to the species.</p>
<p>Survival was the quiet triumph of the trial. Across all treatments, survival remained above 80 percent from six months through 74 months after planting, with several treatments achieving complete survival. That figure exceeds results from smallholder plantings in southwestern Ethiopia, where around 80.6 percent of Grevillea survived three years near homesteads, and the authors credit the intensive research-station management—weeping, hoeing, and protection from livestock—that smallholders often cannot replicate. In the drylands of northern Ethiopia, where planted seedling survival is frequently undermined by moisture stress, poor site conditions, and weak post-planting care, such numbers are far from trivial.</p>
<p>The practical implications cut against intuition. Rather than confirming that bigger containers and longer nursery stays produce better trees, the study concludes that 8- and 10-centimeter pots combined with 4- to 5-month-old seedlings represent a sound choice for Grevillea establishment in the midland Amhara context. This aligns with earlier Ethiopian findings that five months is sufficient for the species to reach planting size, but contrasts with Kenyan research recommending larger 9-centimeter pots and eight-month-old seedlings. The discrepancy, the authors suggest, reflects differences in altitude, site quality, rainfall, and management—reminders that nursery prescriptions are not universal but must be tuned to local conditions.</p>
<p>The study is candid about its limits. It examined only one exotic species, omitted a cost-benefit analysis of the different pot and age combinations, and left open the question of how indigenous species with slow growth and longer nursery requirements would respond. The authors call for further research on optimal seedling age and pot size for species with poor germination and sluggish early growth, explicitly including economic analysis. Still, the core message stands: quality seedling production is a prerequisite for successful plantation establishment, and the choices made in the nursery—down to the diameter of a polythene bag—ripple outward into the survival and growth of trees planted years later. For a country racing to restore degraded highlands, that is a cheap lever with long reach.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effects of nursery pot size and seedling age on the growth and survival of Grevillea robusta in Ethiopia</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Effect of pot size and seedling age on growth and survival of Grevillea robusta (A. Cunn.) in the Eastern Amhara region of Ethiopia</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Alemu, A. A., Ayalew, G. G., Mengistie, H. K., Sisay, D. W., Menber, G. A., Alle, T. R., &amp; Ayene, M. W. (2026). Effect of pot size and seedling age on growth and survival of Grevillea robusta (A. Cunn.) in the Eastern Amhara region of Ethiopia. <em>Discover Conservation, 3</em>(1), Article 6. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44353-026-00076-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44353-026-00076-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44353-026-00076-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44353-026-00076-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Grevillea robusta, silky oak, seedling age, pot size, nursery management, Ethiopia, reforestation, agroforestry, root-to-shoot ratio, survival rate, land degradation, field trial</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">225366</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friendly Soil Bacterium Settles Into Barley Roots Without Upsetting the Neighborhood</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/friendly-soil-bacterium-settles-into-barley-roots-without-upsetting-the-neighborhood/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 00:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[16S rRNA sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barley root microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficial soil bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biostimulants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biostimulants and soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of microbial inoculants on native microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ensifer meliloti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ensifer meliloti strain Rm2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field study on microbial inoculants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial inoculant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial inoculants in sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial inoculation safety and efficacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[native soil microbial community impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen-fixing bacteria in crop growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant growth-promoting bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-microbe interactions in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quorum sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial diversity preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=224678</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A three-year German field trial shows the beneficial bacterium Ensifer meliloti Rm2011 persistently colonizes barley roots across genotypes and seasons while leaving the native rhizosphere microbial community essentially undisturbed.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the push to make agriculture less dependent on synthetic chemicals, few ideas have generated as much enthusiasm as microbial inoculants: living bacteria and fungi that are deliberately added to seeds or soil to boost crop growth, prime plant immunity, or fend off pathogens. Yet a persistent worry shadows this enthusiasm. When farmers release vast numbers of a single bacterial strain into a field, does that strain simply help the crop, or does it also bulldoze its way through the delicate native microbial communities that live around plant roots? A new three-year field study, published in the journal Plant and Soil, offers one of the most detailed answers to date, and the verdict is reassuring for the biostimulant industry: a well-known beneficial bacterium can establish itself durably in the barley rhizosphere year after year while leaving the resident prokaryotic community essentially untouched.</p>
<p>The research, led by Nina Bziuk and Jasper Schierstaedt of the Julius Kühn Institute in Braunschweig, Germany, together with colleagues at the University of Copenhagen, focused on Ensifer meliloti strain Rm2011, a soil-dwelling relative of the nitrogen-fixing symbionts that partner with legumes such as alfalfa. Although E. meliloti is famous for forming nitrogen-fixing nodules on legume roots, previous work had shown that this strain can do something remarkable in barley, a cereal that forms no nodules at all: it produces a quorum-sensing molecule, an N-acyl-homoserine lactone, that primes the barley immune system and reduces infection by leaf rust in certain genotypes. The question was whether this molecular trickster could survive and persist in the harsh, competitive environment of a real field, and what it would do to the microbial neighborhood once it got there.</p>
<p>To find out, the team ran replicated field trials over three consecutive growing seasons at the Julius Kühn Institute experimental site in Braunschweig. Eight different barley genotypes were grown in one-square-meter plots, including the genetically characterized reference lines Golden Promise and Morex and five accessions from the GENOBAR diversity panel. Seeds were soaked in a bacterial suspension containing roughly one hundred million cells per milliliter, and plants were drenched twice more during the growing season, at twenty and forty-one days after sowing, aiming for an inoculum density of one million cells per gram of soil. The researchers then sampled the rhizosphere, the thin layer of soil clinging to the roots and shaped by root exudates, at four time points in each season: 19, 28, 55, and 76 days after sowing.</p>
<p>Tracking the invader required some clever microbiological detective work. Because many soil bacteria are naturally resistant to the antibiotics used for selection, the team generated rifampicin-resistant mutants of Rm2011 and selected the fastest-growing, best quorum-sensing-producing variant for the field. Re-isolated colonies were confirmed as the true inoculant strain by DNA fingerprinting. The results revealed a striking temperature dependence. In two of the three years, a cold snap followed sowing, and no inoculant cells could be recovered from the rhizosphere at the first sampling; laboratory tests confirmed that the strain cannot survive below about eight degrees Celsius. In the warmer year, the bacteria persisted from the seed onward. Seed coating alone, however, delivered only modest colonization, around a few hundred thousand cells per gram of seed, likely because Gram-negative bacteria like E. meliloti are more sensitive to drying than the spore-forming Gram-positive strains that dominate commercial biostimulants.</p>
<p>Soil drenching proved to be the decisive application method. After the drench treatments, the inoculant established stably in the rhizosphere of all barley genotypes, reaching average densities of around eighty million cells per gram of dry root shortly after the second drench and then settling at roughly four million cells per gram for the remainder of the vegetation period. Crucially, this colonization success was independent of plant genotype and of the year, even though the three trials were conducted on different field areas with different preceding crops. That threshold matters: earlier research suggests that a beneficial strain must reach at least one hundred thousand cells to trigger induced systemic resistance in a plant, and the drenched plots comfortably exceeded that level throughout the season.</p>
<p>The bigger ecological question was what all those added cells did to the native community. To answer it, the team sequenced the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene from hundreds of rhizosphere and bulk soil samples, generating more than 7.5 million reads assigned to over 183,000 amplicon sequence variants. The dominant phyla were the familiar pillars of agricultural soils: Proteobacteria, Bacteroidota, Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria, Firmicutes, and Crenarchaeota, with genera such as Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Massilia, and Rhizobium abundant in nearly every sample. Statistical models revealed a clear hierarchy of forces shaping this community. The sampling year mattered most, followed by the barley genotype and the plant&#8217;s developmental stage. The inoculation treatment, by contrast, had only a minor and inconsistent effect on overall community composition across all three years.</p>
<p>Diversity metrics told a similar story. Shannon diversity, a standard measure combining species richness and evenness, was shaped significantly by host genotype at the end of each season, but the inoculant itself rarely moved the needle, with only scattered genotype-specific responses in individual years. Temporal dynamics dominated: the developmental stage of the plant, and the weather that accompanied it, drove the biggest shifts in community structure over the growing season. When the researchers correlated taxon abundances with environmental measurements, consistent patterns emerged. Genera such as Rhizobium, Sphingomonas, Exiguobacterium, and Micrococcaceae tracked soil and air temperatures positively, while Massilia, Rhizobacter, Paenibacillus, and members of Vicinamibacteriales correlated negatively. Nitrososphaeraceae, Pedobacter, and Dyadobacter showed mixed responses, favoring humidity and rainfall but disliking heat. In other words, the weather, not the inoculant, was the loudest voice in the rhizosphere.</p>
<p>There was one notable exception to the inoculant&#8217;s invisibility. A single amplicon sequence variant assigned to the genus Ensifer was significantly enriched in inoculated plots across all three years, with a log fold change of nearly seven when all years and time points were pooled. A handful of other taxa, including Streptomyces, Lysobacter, Kosakonia, and Bacillus, also increased modestly in inoculated samples, while one Rhizobium variant was more abundant in controls. These targeted shifts, the authors argue, are exactly what a well-behaved inoculant should look like: the added strain takes up its own niche and is detectable in the sequencing data, but it does not displace or restructure the broader community. Consistent with invader theory, which holds that microbial invaders only reshape communities that are already unstable, the barley rhizosphere appears to have been a stable, resilient system that tolerated the visitor without being transformed by it.</p>
<p>The implications reach well beyond one bacterium and one crop. As European policy pushes to cut chemical inputs in agriculture by half by 2030, demand for reliable biological alternatives is surging, and Gram-negative strains like E. meliloti, with their metabolic versatility and ability to communicate with plants through quorum-sensing signals, represent a largely untapped class of next-generation biostimulants. But this study also delivers practical warnings. Seed coating alone may fail for Gram-negative strains sensitive to desiccation and cold, so drenching at the right moment, after soils have warmed, appears essential. And because colonization success, community dynamics, and even the plant immune response all depend on temperature, genotype, and seasonal conditions, the authors emphasize that no single greenhouse experiment can predict field performance. Only long-term, multi-season studies like this one, they conclude, can reveal whether a beneficial microbe is a genuine ecological citizen or a potential invasive guest, and in this case, three years of evidence suggest Rm2011 is the former: a tolerated visitor that does its job quietly and goes home when the weather turns cold.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Long-term field assessment of the rhizosphere persistence and ecological impact of the bacterial inoculant Ensifer meliloti Rm2011 on barley microbiomes</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Spatiotemporal dynamics of the barley rhizosphere prokaryotic community following repeated inoculation with Ensifer meliloti Rm2011 in a three-year field study</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Bziuk, N., Cambeis, M., Pohl, K., Nesme, J., Sørensen, S. J., Schikora, A., Smalla, K., &amp; Schierstaedt, J. (2026). Spatiotemporal dynamics of the barley rhizosphere prokaryotic community following repeated inoculation with Ensifer meliloti Rm2011 in a three-year field study. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09083-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09083-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09083-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09083-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Ensifer meliloti, barley, rhizosphere, microbiome, microbial inoculant, plant growth-promoting bacteria, 16S rRNA sequencing, field trial, quorum sensing, soil microbiology, sustainable agriculture, biostimulants</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">224678</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CRISPR Multiplex Editing Rewires Soybean Flowering Genes to Create Early-Maturing Lines in Just Two Generations</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/crispr-multiplex-editing-rewires-soybean-flowering-genes-to-create-early-maturing-lines-in-just-two-generations/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptation of soybean to higher latitudes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allele diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR multiplex editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR-Cas9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR-Cas9 plant genetic engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop biotechnology for climate adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E1 gene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early-maturing soybean lines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flowering time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic reprogramming of flowering genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genome editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome editing in legumes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maturity groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoperiod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoperiod sensitivity in crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precision breeding in soybean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid crop trait development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soybean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soybean breeding and genetic improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soybean flowering time modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIGV]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=218458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Multiplex CRISPR-Cas9 editing of twelve flowering-time repressors has produced soybean lines that flower up to four weeks earlier under controlled conditions and one to two weeks earlier in the field, opening the door to soybean cultivation at higher European latitudes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soybean is one of the world&#8217;s most important crops, a cornerstone of plant protein and vegetable oil production, and a crop that European agriculture would dearly love to grow more of. Yet despite decades of breeding effort, the soybean&#8217;s cultivation footprint in Europe remains far smaller than its agronomic potential. The reason lies in the plant&#8217;s own biology: soybean is a short-day species, meaning its flowering is triggered by the length of the night, and most cultivars are so finely tuned to their local day length that they can only be grown within a narrow latitudinal band of roughly 200 kilometers. At higher latitudes, where long summer days dominate the growing season, soybean must flower early enough to complete seed fill before the first autumn frosts. A new study published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics now demonstrates that multiplex CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing can rapidly reprogram this photoperiod sensitivity, converting elite late-flowering soybean lines into early-flowering ones within just two generations.</p>
<p>The research, led by Manon Monfort and Fabien Nogué of Université Paris-Saclay and INRAE in collaboration with Corteva Agriscience, took aim at the genetic network that controls flowering time in soybean. Rather than knocking out a single gene and hoping for a dramatic effect, the team embraced a strategy known as Targeted Induced Gene Variation, or TIGV. The idea is elegant: instead of predicting in advance which allele combination will produce the desired phenotype, researchers simultaneously edit many genes within a defined developmental pathway, then screen the resulting population for the traits they want. Because flowering time is a polygenic trait, single-gene knockouts often produce discrete, all-or-nothing phenotypic shifts rather than the continuous gradation of flowering times that breeders actually need to fine-tune adaptation across latitude gradients. Multiplex editing, by contrast, generates a spectrum of allelic combinations that mimics and extends natural variation while remaining confined to biologically relevant targets.</p>
<p>To build their editing toolkit, the researchers first selected twelve flowering-time repressors whose loss of function was expected to accelerate flowering, drawing on decades of soybean genetics. The targets included the famous E1 gene, the master repressor of flowering under long days, along with its homologs E1La and E1Lb, the phytochrome genes E3, E4 and PHYA1, the circadian-associated Tof12, the CONSTANS-like genes COL1a and COL1b, the AP2-family repressor TOE4a, the flowering repressor E10/GmFT4, and DT1, which controls stem growth habit. Three plasmids were assembled, each carrying a different combination of guide RNAs, with the largest construct targeting eleven genes simultaneously. This scale is remarkable: previous multiplex CRISPR experiments in soybean had typically targeted three to six genes at a time. The Cas9 cassette was driven by the soybean EF1A2 promoter, and guide RNAs were expressed from native soybean U6 promoters, with each construct also carrying a spectinomycin selection marker and a DsRed seed-fluorescence marker to track transgene presence.</p>
<p>The two starting materials were proprietary commercial cultivars 91B42, belonging to maturity group I, and 93Y21, belonging to maturity group III. Soybean cultivars are classified into fourteen maturity groups, from MG 0000 in the highest latitudes to MG X in the tropics, reflecting their flowering response to day length. Both chosen cultivars were late-flowering but agronomically strong, making them ideal tests of whether editing could add precocity without destroying elite performance. Embryonic axes isolated from mature seeds were transformed with Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying the three plasmids, and regenerated plantlets were grown to maturity in the greenhouse. Illumina amplicon sequencing of the T0 plants confirmed that nearly all guide RNAs were functional, with only the E1La/E1Lb guide in one plasmid failing to edit. Eight independent T0 plants of the 91B42 background and thirty of the 93Y21 background produced selfed T1 seed for screening.</p>
<p>The phenotypic results were striking. In the greenhouse under long-day conditions, the unedited 93Y21 control flowered on average 61.5 days after sowing, while the earliest edited T1 lines flowered at just 37 to 37.6 days, an advance of roughly 24 days, or nearly four weeks. Across the edited population, flowering times spanned a broad continuum, from more than three weeks earlier than wild type to only one week earlier or no difference at all, exactly the kind of phenotypic diversity the TIGV approach was designed to create. Genotyping of 2,408 targeted loci across the T1 populations revealed that 83 percent had been edited, with 28 percent carrying homozygous mutations and 38 percent carrying frameshift mutations on both alleles, configurations likely to abolish gene function entirely. The number of distinct alleles created at each locus ranged from 23 at E3 to 73 at DT1, underscoring the sheer diversity generated by the experiment.</p>
<p>The mutational signatures themselves told a familiar molecular story. More than half of the induced alleles were small deletions of fewer than 20 base pairs near the predicted cut site, many flanked by short microhomologies characteristic of the alternative end-joining repair pathway. Single base-pair insertions that duplicated an adjacent nucleotide, the hallmark of classical non-homologous end joining, accounted for about 10 percent of alleles, while larger insertions, including one of 112 base pairs, made up 14 percent. Roughly a third of the mutations were in-frame, consistent with a random distribution of repair outcomes. This repair bias toward small indels carries regulatory significance: in many jurisdictions, including under the recently adopted European framework for certain New Genomic Techniques, plants carrying such edits and free of exogenous DNA are classified as conventional crops rather than GMOs, a distinction that could smooth the path to commercialization for these early-flowering lines.</p>
<p>When the researchers advanced early-flowering T1 plants to the T2 generation and re-phenotyped their progeny, the early-flowering trait proved heritable and even more pronounced. The earliest lines, such as #19.12, #15.6 and #20.18, flowered 35 days after sowing compared with 62 days for the wild type, a 27-day advancement that actually preceded the flowering of the commercial ultra-early cultivar ES Comandor, a MG 000 variety. Other lines showed more moderate precocity of one to two weeks, and a few families displayed internal variability consistent with segregation from heterozygous T1 parents. Combining the genotype and phenotype data revealed the architecture of the trait: loss of function at E1 emerged as the major driver of early flowering, with lines carrying E1 frameshift alleles flowering roughly 20 to 22 days earlier than controls, while stacking three or four additional edits on top of the E1 knockout shaved off roughly another week. Frameshift mutations in E3 and E4 were also associated with earlier flowering in some backgrounds, whereas Tof12 and PHYA1 mutations produced no obvious additional shift in the combinations recovered.</p>
<p>The critical test came in the field. Seventy-two edited lines, all confirmed by Southern-by-sequencing to be free of the T-DNA editing construct, were planted in May 2025 in Iowa, within a maturity group II environment, alongside their wild-type parents and nine commercial or pre-commercial controls ranging from MG 000 to MG 0. The field results confirmed the direction of the greenhouse phenotype but tempered its magnitude. The earliest 91B42-derived edited lines flowered about one week earlier than their wild type in the field, compared with up to 24 days earlier in the greenhouse, while most 93Y21-derived lines flowered roughly ten days earlier in the field versus up to 27 days earlier indoors. Notably, the edited 93Y21 lines did not outperform the MG 00 and MG 000 commercial controls in the field as they had in the greenhouse, instead flowering at times comparable to the MG I control. The lesson is clear: greenhouse photoperiod and temperature regimes can exaggerate flowering-time effects, and only field evaluation can establish agronomic reality.</p>
<p>Earlier flowering translated into earlier maturity, with edited 91B42 lines maturing about one week sooner and edited 93Y21 lines about two weeks sooner than their parents. Flowering time and maturity were strongly correlated, with a Pearson coefficient of 0.77, but flowering explained only about 59 percent of the variation in maturity, a reminder that post-flowering development obeys its own genetic and environmental logic. Yield told a more nuanced story. Lines carrying a DT1 knockout, which imposes a determinate, dwarfed growth habit, proved disastrous under field conditions, producing severely stunted plants with pods close to the ground and average plot yields of only around 262 to 268 grams. In contrast, edited lines retaining the indeterminate growth habit performed well: edited 91B42 lines yielded 644 grams per plot, statistically indistinguishable from the MG 00 commercial control at 700 grams, and edited 93Y21 lines averaged 843 grams, comparable to MG 0 and MG I controls. Near-infrared spectroscopy confirmed that seed oil content, ranging from 18.1 to 21.4 percent, and protein content, from 33.1 to 39.5 percent, fell within the ranges of commercial controls, indicating no adverse effects on seed composition.</p>
<p>The broader implications extend well beyond a handful of early soybean lines. The study demonstrates that multiplex CRISPR-Cas9 editing can compress what would traditionally take a decade of crossing and selection into two generations, delivering a gradient of flowering times within elite genetic backgrounds rather than a single extreme phenotype. Breeders can now select the precise degree of precocity a target environment demands, and the genotype-phenotype map generated here, with E1 as the major entry point and secondary loci as fine-tuning dials, offers a rational guide for the next round of editing. The authors also point toward intriguing possibilities such as varietal mixtures, in which lines differing by only a few days in flowering time could buffer crops against increasingly erratic weather. Multi-location, multi-year trials across high-latitude European environments will be needed to confirm environmental stability, but the proof of concept is compelling: the genetic keys to northern soybean adaptation now sit within reach of a single editing experiment.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> CRISPR-Cas9 multiplex editing of flowering-time genes to generate early-flowering soybean lines adapted to high-latitude environments</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Targeted allelic diversification of flowering genes via CRISPR-Cas enables the development of multiple early-flowering soybean lines</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Monfort, M., Brugière, N., Calbry, J., Lacou, L., Roeber, F., &amp; Nogué, F. (2026). Targeted allelic diversification of flowering genes via CRISPR-Cas enables the development of multiple early-flowering soybean lines. <em>Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 139</em>(10), Article 286. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05400-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05400-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05400-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00122-026-05400-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> soybean, CRISPR-Cas9, flowering time, genome editing, maturity groups, E1 gene, photoperiod, plant breeding, TIGV, allele diversity, field trial, European agriculture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">218458</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
