<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>FESEM &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/fesem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 22:21:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Invasive Water Hyacinth Turned Into Biofuel With a Simple Thermal Pretreatment Twist</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/invasive-water-hyacinth-turned-into-biofuel-with-a-simple-thermal-pretreatment-twist/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 22:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anaerobic digestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anaerobic digestion of invasive aquatic plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquatic invasive species management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autoclave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioethanol production from water hyacinth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomethanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomethanol from aquatic plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circular bioeconomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cow dung inoculum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological impact of water hyacinth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FESEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green alkaline reagents from wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative biomass pretreatment methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lignocellulosic biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microwave irradiation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petha wastewater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pretreatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy from aquatic invasive species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second-generation biofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable biofuel feedstock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water hyacinth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water hyacinth biofuel conversion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=256198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Indian researchers show that autoclave and microwave pretreatment with alkaline petha wastewater boosts bioethanol and biomethanol yields from invasive water hyacinth while neutralizing industrial effluent.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Water hyacinth is one of the world&#8217;s most notorious aquatic invaders, choking freshwater bodies across Asia, Africa and beyond with astonishing speed. A new study published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research by Gunjan Singh, Yogita Jain and Radhika Singh of Dayalbagh Educational Institute in Agra, India, suggests that this ecological nuisance could become a valuable feedstock for liquid biofuels, provided the plant&#8217;s tough lignocellulosic armor is cracked open in the right way. The researchers report that relatively gentle thermal pretreatments, combined with a green alkaline reagent recovered from food-industry wastewater, substantially boosted the conversion of water hyacinth stems into bioethanol and biomethanol through anaerobic digestion.</p>
<p>The central challenge the team confronted is familiar to anyone working with second-generation biofuels. Water hyacinth, like straw, bagasse and other lignocellulosic materials, embeds its fermentable sugars within a dense matrix of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. This recalcitrant structure resists microbial and enzymatic attack, which means untreated biomass yields disappointingly little fuel. Pretreatment is the crucial step that disrupts the matrix, increasing the accessibility of the polysaccharides to the microorganisms that carry out anaerobic digestion. The Indian team&#8217;s twist was to pair thermal disruption with an unconventional, waste-derived alkaline agent rather than a costly commercial chemical.</p>
<p>That agent is petha wastewater, the highly alkaline effluent generated by petha sweet manufacturers in Agra, a city famous for the translucent sugar delicacy. Instead of viewing this industrial stream purely as a disposal problem, the researchers exploited its extreme alkalinity, which sits between pH 12 and 14, as a pretreatment reagent for biomass. A 15 percent weight-per-volume solution of the wastewater served as the green chemical component of the pretreatment. This dual-purpose strategy addresses two environmental burdens simultaneously: the spread of an invasive aquatic plant and the responsible management of an aggressive industrial effluent, both of which are significant waste-disposal challenges in the region.</p>
<p>The experimental design compared two thermal approaches layered on top of the alkaline soak. In the first, biomass samples were autoclaved at 100 degrees Celsius for just five minutes. In the second, samples were exposed to microwave irradiation at 80 watts for 25 minutes. After pretreatment, the processed water hyacinth stems were subjected to anaerobic digestion using cow dung as the mixed microbial inoculum, with the substrate and inoculum combined at an 80:20 ratio. Cow dung, a readily available and inexpensive source of diverse anaerobic microbes, provides the enzymatic machinery needed to hydrolyze the opened-up biomass and convert released sugars into alcohols.</p>
<p>The results favored the autoclave route. Autoclave-pretreated water hyacinth delivered 6.7 percent more bioethanol and 13.8 percent more biomethanol than microwave-pretreated material, establishing pressurized steam as the superior partner for the alkaline petha wastewater in this system. Both thermal routes outperformed untreated biomass, confirming that the pretreatment step meaningfully improved the degradability of the stems. The magnitude of the methanol improvement in particular suggests that the combination of alkali and steam was especially effective at liberating the substrates that anaerobic communities funnel toward methanol formation.</p>
<p>To understand why the pretreatments worked, the team turned to advanced imaging and elemental analysis. Field emission scanning electron microscopy, or FESEM, revealed pronounced changes in the surface morphology of the pretreated stems, showing the structural damage inflicted on the lignocellulosic matrix. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, or EDX, documented corresponding shifts in the elemental composition of the biomass. Together, these techniques painted a consistent picture: the pretreated material presented a far more accessible surface to microbes and enzymes, explaining the gains in fuel yield. Such characterization is critical in biofuel research because it links a process parameter directly to the physical mechanism that drives improved conversion.</p>
<p>An equally important outcome concerned the petha wastewater itself. The pretreatment process drew down the effluent&#8217;s punishingly high alkaline pH to nearly neutral levels, making the spent liquid far more suitable for subsequent biological processing or disposal. In conventional biofuel schemes, alkaline pretreatment consumes fresh chemicals and generates a new waste stream that must be neutralized. Here, the chemistry runs in the opposite direction: the waste stream does the chemical work, and the biomass does the neutralizing. The authors argue that this co-pretreatment approach enhances overall resource recovery and embodies the principles of a circular bioeconomy, in which one industry&#8217;s effluent becomes another process&#8217;s reagent.</p>
<p>The choice of feedstock carries its own strategic weight. Water hyacinth grows prolifically, requires no land, fertilizer or irrigation, and its removal from lakes and rivers actively benefits aquatic ecosystems by restoring oxygen exchange and water flow. Its extensive presence, low cost and ecological harm make biofuel generation from the plant economically and environmentally attractive, transforming a waste biomass problem into an energy asset. Previous studies, including work by some of the same authors on rice straw pretreated with petha wastewater, had hinted at the promise of this green chemistry approach; the new findings extend it to a notoriously stubborn aquatic feedstock and quantify the thermal options available.</p>
<p>Looking forward, the study positions water hyacinth as part of a broader waste-to-energy portfolio that also spans biodiesel, biogas and solid biofuels. Biomethanol is drawing growing attention as a renewable fuel for internal combustion engines and as a chemical platform molecule, while bioethanol remains the most widely deployed liquid biofuel worldwide. A process that simultaneously harvests an invasive plant, cleans up an alkaline industrial effluent and produces two marketable fuels is precisely the kind of integrated solution that circular-economy advocates call for. The authors note that the approach enhances resource recovery while tackling both problems with a single environmentally conscious pretreatment method, a framing likely to resonate with policymakers seeking cost-effective biomass valorization in regions where water hyacinth infestations and small-scale food processing coexist.</p>
<p>The research, received in August 2025 and published in September 2026, was conducted at the Biohydrogen Lab of Dayalbagh Educational Institute, with all experimental work carried out by Gunjan Singh and the concept designed by Radhika Singh and Yogita Jain. While scaling from laboratory digesters to industrial biorefineries will require further optimization of costs, energy inputs and process reliability, the study offers a technically grounded demonstration that the barrier standing between an invasive weed and a tank of fuel can be dismantled with steam, microwaves and, remarkably, sweet-shop wastewater.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Thermal and green alkaline pretreatment of water hyacinth biomass for enhanced bioethanol and biomethanol production via anaerobic digestion</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Thermal pretreatment of water hyacinth: a sustainable route for bioethanol and biomethanol production</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Singh, G., Jain, Y., &amp; Singh, R. (2026). Thermal pretreatment of water hyacinth: a sustainable route for bioethanol and biomethanol production. <em>Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 33</em>(29), 14854-14866. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38186-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38186-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38186-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11356-026-38186-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> water hyacinth, bioethanol, biomethanol, anaerobic digestion, pretreatment, lignocellulosic biomass, petha wastewater, circular bioeconomy, cow dung inoculum, FESEM, autoclave, microwave irradiation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">256198</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Decode the Atomic Birth of Nickel Thin Films</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/scientists-decode-the-atomic-birth-of-nickel-thin-films/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 10:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomic-scale nucleation in electroplating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bath pH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronoamperometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crystal growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyclic voltammetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effect of nickel ion concentration in electrodeposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical parameters in nickel plating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical theory in coating fabrication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrodeposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FESEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formation of cracks in nickel coatings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen evolution reaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial nickel coating quality control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of pH on electroplated coatings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microscopy analysis of nickel films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoscale processes in electroplating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nickel thin film electrodeposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nickel thin films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nucleation kinetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parameters affecting thin film smoothness and roughness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scharifker-Hills model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stainless steel substrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stainless steel substrate electroplating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-ray diffraction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=237712</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in India have shown how deposition potential, pH, and bath concentration switch nickel electrodeposition between instantaneous, progressive, and mixed nucleation mechanisms, directly controlling whether the resulting thin films are cracked or compact.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every electroplated coating, from the chrome-like sheen on bathroom fittings to the nickel layers that protect electronics and catalytic components, begins with a moment of creation so small that it happens atom by atom on an electrode surface. A team of researchers in Maharashtra, India, has now mapped that moment in unusual detail, showing how the earliest instants of nickel electrodeposition determine whether the resulting thin film emerges smooth and compact or rough and cracked. Their study, published in Discover Electrochemistry, combines classic electrochemical theory with modern microscopy to link the invisible choreography of nuclei formation to the visible quality of industrial coatings.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Dipali Potdar of Jaysingpur College and Shivaji University together with colleagues including corresponding authors Shivaji Sadale and Prashant Chikode, electrodeposited nickel thin films onto 304-grade stainless steel substrates from simple sulfate baths. They systematically varied three parameters that any plating shop can control: the applied deposition potential, the pH of the electrolyte, and the concentration of nickel ions in solution. By sweeping nickel sulfate concentrations from 25 to 50 millimolar and adjusting pH from 4 to 8 with ammonium hydroxide, they created a matrix of deposition conditions whose effects could be traced all the way from current signatures to crystal structure.</p>
<p>The central analytical tool was the Scharifker-Hills model, a theoretical framework developed in 1983 that remains the workhorse for interpreting nucleation during electrodeposition. The model distinguishes between two limiting behaviors. In instantaneous nucleation, all active sites on the electrode surface are occupied essentially at once, so the number of nuclei is fixed from the start and each nucleus simply grows. In progressive nucleation, new sites continue to activate throughout the deposition, so the population of nuclei keeps increasing. The shape of the current-time transient, recorded when a fixed potential is applied, carries the fingerprint of whichever mechanism dominates, and comparing normalized experimental curves against the model&#8217;s dimensionless predictions reveals the mechanism at work.</p>
<p>Before diving into transients, the team used cyclic voltammetry to establish the electrochemical landscape of their bath. Sweeping the potential from 0.7 volts down to minus 1 volt against a silver-silver chloride reference electrode, they observed a stable current until an onset potential near minus 0.7 volts, followed by a rapid rise and a cathodic peak at minus 0.88 volts, which they attribute to the reduction of nickel ions on the stainless steel surface. A further surge at more negative potentials signaled the onset of the hydrogen evolution reaction, the parasitic process that plagues nickel plating by generating gas bubbles at the electrode. Two crossover points on the reverse scan, at minus 0.78 and minus 0.43 volts, marked the initiation of nucleation and the adsorption of nickel ions on the surface, while an anodic peak at minus 0.2 volts reflected nickel oxidation.</p>
<p>The voltammetry also revealed that the deposition reaction is diffusion-controlled. Recording curves at scan rates of 10, 20, and 30 millivolts per second, the researchers found that the anodic peak current density scaled linearly with the square root of the scan rate, exactly the relationship predicted by the Randles-Sevcik equation for a process limited by how fast nickel ions can travel to the electrode. This diffusion control proved crucial for interpreting everything that followed, because when ions arrive at the surface faster than they can be replenished from the bulk solution, the geometry of the depletion zones around growing nuclei shapes both the current response and the final film morphology.</p>
<p>Chronoamperometry, the recording of current as a function of time at a fixed applied potential, then exposed the three-act drama of nickel electrocrystallization. In the first fraction of a millisecond, a sharp spike and decay of current reflects double-layer charging and ion adsorption. A rapid rise follows as new nuclei form and each one draws a hemispherical diffusion zone around itself, pushing the current to a maximum. Beyond that peak, the current decays in a manner governed by the Cottrell equation, the classic signature of diffusion-limited mass transfer, before settling into a plateau where the supply of nickel ions from the bulk solution constrains everything. This characteristic profile confirmed that nickel deposition on stainless steel follows a three-dimensional nucleation process, with hemispherical clusters growing and eventually coalescing into a continuous film.</p>
<p>The comparison with the Scharifker-Hills model produced the study&#8217;s most striking finding: the nucleation mechanism is not fixed but shifts with deposition conditions. At underpotentials, where the driving force is modest, the transients tracked the progressive nucleation curve, because the nucleation rate lagged behind the growth rate and new sites kept activating. At overpotentials, the curves aligned closely with instantaneous nucleation, since the nucleation barrier is overcome quickly and a large population of nuclei forms simultaneously. At the reduction potential itself, a mixed mechanism appeared. Raising the bath pH from 4 to 8 pushed the system toward progressive nucleation, which the authors attribute to pH-dependent changes in hydroxide species and surface energetics that favor the continuous creation of new nucleation sites over time.</p>
<p>Concentration played an equally decisive role. Films grown from the most dilute 25 millimolar bath followed the instantaneous nucleation curve, while the 37 and 50 millimolar baths produced mixed instantaneous and progressive behavior, echoing earlier observations of silver deposition on glassy carbon. The team notes that experimental curves deviated from ideal theory in places, with a slower current decay than predicted, which they attribute to side processes such as hydrogen evolution, adsorption, and charge-transfer resistance. These deviations are a reminder that real plating baths are chemically messy systems, and that the clean limiting cases of nucleation theory blend into one another under practical conditions.</p>
<p>What makes the study compelling is that the electrochemical fingerprints translated directly into physical film quality. X-ray diffraction confirmed the cubic crystal structure of nickel in every film, with a prominent reflection from the (111) planes at 44.5 degrees, and the Williamson-Hall analysis of peak broadening revealed compressive microstrain induced by the stainless steel substrate. Notably, crystallite size, lattice constant, and texture coefficient barely changed across the parameter range, but strain and dislocation density dropped to negligible levels at the highest pH and concentration. Meanwhile, field-emission scanning electron microscopy showed a dramatic morphological transition: films from acidic, dilute baths were rough and cracked, riddled with grain boundaries, while films from alkaline, concentrated baths were smooth, uniform, and compact. The culprit behind the cracking is the hydrogen evolution reaction, whose disruptive bubbles and induced internal stress scar the growing film at low pH but are largely suppressed in alkaline conditions.</p>
<p>The practical implications ripple outward from the plating bath. The authors point out that cracked, fine-grained films with abundant grain boundaries resist dislocation movement and are therefore harder, but the same boundaries promote corrosion, whereas the coarser, compact films grown at higher pH and concentration conduct electricity better and resist corrosion. Because nickel coatings serve industries ranging from metal decoration and electronic components to catalysis and energy storage, the ability to dial in a specific nucleation mechanism and morphology through nothing more exotic than pH, concentration, and potential offers a low-cost route to tailored coatings. The researchers acknowledge support from the Mahatma Jyotiba Phule Research and Training Institute, and their work stands as a reminder that some of the most consequential physics in manufacturing happens in the first milliseconds, when a handful of atoms decides what kind of surface the world will see.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Nucleation and growth kinetics during the electrodeposition of nickel thin films on stainless steel</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Studies on nucleation and growth kinetics during electrodeposition of nickel thin films</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Potdar, D., Patil, S., Kulkarni, Y., Pawar, N., Banne, S., Sadale, S., &amp; Chikode, P. (2026). Studies on nucleation and growth kinetics during electrodeposition of nickel thin films. <em>Discover Electrochemistry, 3</em>(1), Article 29. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44373-026-00115-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44373-026-00115-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44373-026-00115-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44373-026-00115-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> electrodeposition, nickel thin films, nucleation kinetics, Scharifker-Hills model, chronoamperometry, cyclic voltammetry, stainless steel substrate, hydrogen evolution reaction, X-ray diffraction, FESEM, bath pH, crystal growth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">237712</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
