<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fermentation kinetics &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/fermentation-kinetics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 17:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Two Yeasts, One Wine: Sequential Fermentation Boosts Cabernet Sauvignon Aroma and Cuts Alcohol</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/two-yeasts-one-wine-sequential-fermentation-boosts-cabernet-sauvignon-aroma-and-cuts-alcohol/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 17:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acetate esters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthocyanins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabernet Sauvignon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabernet Sauvignon aroma enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlled fermentation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Hanseniaspora uvarum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fermentation kinetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanseniaspora uvarum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of yeast inoculation order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving wine complexity and alcohol regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indigenous yeast strains in winemaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of yeast sequencing on wine aroma and quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative winemaking methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lower-alcohol wine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial partnerships from vineyard terroir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-Saccharomyces yeast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyphenols]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing wine alcohol content through fermentation techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saccharomyces cerevisiae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequential fermentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequential fermentation in wine production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine aroma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wine color]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yeast strains in winemaking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=255029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chinese researchers found that inoculating Cabernet Sauvignon must with indigenous Hanseniaspora uvarum two days before Saccharomyces cerevisiae lowers wine alcohol while boosting polyphenols, color and aromatic complexity.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A team of food scientists in China has shown that the order in which two wine yeasts are introduced into fermenting grape juice can dramatically reshape the character of the resulting Cabernet Sauvignon, lowering its alcohol content while enriching it with a far more complex bouquet of aromatic compounds. The study, published in npj Science of Food, compared three controlled fermentation strategies using yeasts isolated from the same vineyard environment, and found that a carefully timed sequential inoculation outperformed both conventional monoculture fermentation and simultaneous mixed fermentation on nearly every quality metric that matters to winemakers.</p>
<p>The research, led by Lanlan Hu, Zhen Wang, Xiaohong Wang and Xiuyan Zhang from Huazhong Agricultural University and the Henan Institute of Science and Technology, focused on two indigenous yeast strains: Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the workhorse yeast responsible for completing alcoholic fermentation in virtually all wines, and Hanseniaspora uvarum strain Z5L-22, an apiculate yeast that naturally dominates the early stages of spontaneous fermentation before alcohol levels rise too high for it to survive. Both strains were isolated from local wine-growing environments, meaning the experiment tested a microbial partnership drawn from the same terroir as the grapes themselves rather than commercially manufactured starter cultures.</p>
<p>The experimental design was elegantly simple. The researchers set up three fermentation treatments using Cabernet Sauvignon must. The first was pure fermentation, in which S. cerevisiae alone was inoculated at the start, representing the industry standard approach. The second was simultaneous fermentation, in which both S. cerevisiae and H. uvarum were added together at the onset of fermentation. The third was sequential fermentation, in which H. uvarum was introduced first and S. cerevisiae was added two days later, giving the non-Saccharomyces yeast a head start to grow and metabolize before the dominant fermenter took over. Throughout the fermentations, the team tracked microbial population dynamics, sugar consumption, ethanol production, acidity, color, polyphenols and volatile aroma compounds.</p>
<p>The population dynamics revealed why timing matters so much. In both the pure and simultaneous fermentations, S. cerevisiae quickly established overwhelming dominance, effectively crowding out or outcompeting the H. uvarum population before it could make a meaningful contribution to the wine&#8217;s chemistry. In the sequential fermentation, however, the two-day head start allowed H. uvarum to deplete nutrients in the must and establish itself, which delayed the growth of S. cerevisiae and extended the overall fermentation. While a prolonged fermentation might sound like a drawback, it gave the non-Saccharomyces yeast a genuine window of metabolic activity during which it could produce flavor-active compounds that a fast, dominant S. cerevisiae fermentation would otherwise suppress.</p>
<p>One of the most commercially significant findings concerns alcohol. Wines made with either mixed-yeast strategy contained less ethanol than the pure-culture control, a result of the non-Saccharomyces yeast consuming sugar through metabolic pathways that divert some carbon away from ethanol and toward other products such as glycerol and carbon dioxide. With consumers and regulators increasingly focused on alcohol levels, and with climate change pushing grape ripeness and potential alcohol ever higher in many wine regions, microbiological approaches to alcohol reduction are attracting serious attention. The sequential fermentation achieved this reduction while simultaneously raising total acidity, a change that can improve the freshness and balance of wines made from very ripe fruit.</p>
<p>Color and polyphenol results added further weight to the case for sequential fermentation. Both mixed fermentations increased color saturation relative to the pure culture, but the sequential approach went further, significantly elevating levels of total polyphenols and anthocyanins, the pigmented compounds responsible for the deep red hues of red wine. Anthocyanins and other polyphenols are not merely cosmetic; they contribute to astringency, bitterness and the antioxidant capacity of wine, and their extraction and retention during fermentation are central to red wine quality. The improved chromatic attributes observed in the sequential wines suggest that the altered microbial succession changed the extraction environment in the fermenting must, possibly through differences in ethanol production kinetics and the release of metabolic byproducts that influence phenolic solubility.</p>
<p>The aroma findings were the most striking. Wines from the sequential fermentation contained a diverse and abundant array of varietal and fermentative aroma compounds, with particularly notable increases in acetate esters, higher alcohols, benzene derivatives and key monoterpenes. Acetate esters, formed by the enzymatic esterification of acetic acid with higher alcohols, are responsible for many of the fruity and floral notes prized in young wines. Higher alcohols contribute to overall aromatic intensity, though at high concentrations they can be harsh. Benzene derivatives add floral and spicy nuances, while monoterpenes, typically associated with aromatic grape varieties, impart characteristic floral and citrus-like scents. The sequential fermentation produced a more complex aromatic profile than either the pure fermentation or the simultaneous co-inoculation, indicating that the extended period of H. uvarum activity was the decisive factor in generating this chemical richness.</p>
<p>The contrast between the two mixed-fermentation strategies carries a practical lesson for winemakers. Simultaneous inoculation, despite being easier to implement at scale, allowed S. cerevisiae to dominate so quickly that H. uvarum contributed little beyond what the pure culture achieved. Sequential inoculation, by contrast, deliberately created a temporal niche for the non-Saccharomyces yeast, letting it shape the must chemistry before the alcohol-tolerant S. cerevisiae finished the job. This finding aligns with a broader shift in enology toward using non-Saccharomyces yeasts as tools for modulating wine composition rather than as contaminants to be eliminated, and it suggests that the sequencing, not merely the species mix, is the critical control point.</p>
<p>There are caveats worth noting. The study was conducted on a single grape variety, Cabernet Sauvignon, using specific indigenous strains, and the extended fermentation time associated with the sequential approach could pose logistical challenges in a busy winery where tank turnover matters. The nutrient depletion caused by early H. uvarum growth, which delayed S. cerevisiae, would also need careful management to avoid stuck or sluggish fermentations under commercial conditions. Nonetheless, the authors conclude that sequential fermentation optimally balances reduced alcohol with enhanced polyphenolic and aromatic complexity, offering a promising strategy for producing lower-alcohol wines with superior sensory quality.</p>
<p>The work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and the authors declare no competing interests. As wineries worldwide grapple with rising alcohol levels, changing consumer palates and the demand for wines that express a genuine sense of place, the idea that the answer may lie in orchestrating the native microbial succession of the vineyard itself, rather than in de-alcoholization technology or vineyard interventions, is an appealing one. This study provides concrete evidence that a two-day delay in adding the industry&#8217;s favorite yeast can transform the chemistry of a Cabernet Sauvignon, trading a little fermentation speed for a substantially richer glass.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Sequential yeast fermentation strategy for improving Cabernet Sauvignon wine quality</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Sequential fermentation with indigenous Hanseniaspora uvarum followed by Saccharomyces cerevisiae enhances aroma complexity and quality of Cabernet Sauvignon wine</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hu, L., Wang, Z., Wang, X., &amp; Zhang, X. (2026). Sequential fermentation with indigenous Hanseniaspora uvarum followed by Saccharomyces cerevisiae enhances aroma complexity and quality of Cabernet Sauvignon wine. <em>npj Science of Food</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-026-01165-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-026-01165-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-026-01165-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41538-026-01165-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Hanseniaspora uvarum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, sequential fermentation, Cabernet Sauvignon, wine aroma, lower-alcohol wine, anthocyanins, polyphenols, acetate esters, non-Saccharomyces yeast, fermentation kinetics, wine color</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">255029</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boltzmann Model Outperforms Classic Kinetics in Microbial Polymer Fermentation</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/boltzmann-model-outperforms-classic-kinetics-in-microbial-polymer-fermentation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced fermentation modeling techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIC model selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bacillus subtilis natto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bacillus subtilis natto fermentation process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[batch fermentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biopolymer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biopolymer properties and production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biopolymer synthesis in microbial fermentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioprocess engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boltzmann empirical model in biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boltzmann model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison of fermentation kinetic models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fed-batch scale-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fermentation kinetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improvements over classical fermentation models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial applications of γ-PGA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kinetic modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logistic-Luedeking-Piret model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial biotechnology for wastewater treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial fermentation modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poly-γ-glutamic acid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water-absorbing biopolymers in industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[γ-polyglutamic acid production kinetics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=219230</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in China show that a four-parameter Boltzmann model describes poly-γ-glutamic acid batch fermentation by Bacillus subtilis natto far better than the classical Logistic-Luedeking-Piret kinetic framework, capturing the post-peak product decline the older equations cannot.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A twist of mathematics is reshaping how scientists understand one of biotechnology&#8217;s most versatile microbial products. In a study published in the journal 3 Biotech, researchers led by Shilin Hu and Feilong Sun of Xi&#8217;an Polytechnic University in China have shown that a four-parameter Boltzmann empirical model can describe the batch fermentation of poly-γ-glutamic acid, or γ-PGA, by the bacterium Bacillus subtilis natto more faithfully than the classical Logistic-Luedeking-Piret framework that has dominated fermentation kinetics for decades. The work matters because γ-PGA, a sticky, water-absorbing biopolymer produced naturally by certain Bacillus strains, is finding uses everywhere from wastewater remediation and agriculture to cosmetics and drug delivery, and better models of its production translate directly into better industrial processes.</p>
<p>Poly-γ-glutamic acid is an unusual biopolymer. Unlike proteins, whose amino acids are linked by peptide bonds in a single direction, γ-PGA is built from repeating glutamate units connected through amide bonds between the amino group of one unit and the gamma-carboxyl group of the next. That architecture gives the molecule remarkable properties: it is biodegradable, edible, non-toxic, and capable of holding large amounts of water. It is also produced by the same bacterium that ferments soybeans into the Japanese food natto, which is why Bacillus subtilis natto is a workhorse strain for making it industrially. As demand for sustainable, bio-based materials grows, engineers are under pressure to squeeze every gram of product from every liter of fermentation broth, and that is where kinetic models come in.</p>
<p>For generations, fermentation engineers have leaned on a family of equations known as unstructured kinetic models, which describe how biomass, substrate, and product change over time without tracking every internal metabolic reaction. The most widely used combination pairs the Logistic equation, which captures the sigmoidal, S-shaped growth curve of bacteria, with the Luedeking-Piret equation, which links product formation to both the growth rate and the size of the existing cell population. This Logistic-Luedeking-Piret, or L-LP, framework works well for many fermentations, but it carries a hidden assumption: once the product reaches its peak, it stays there. The equations simply cannot describe a decline in product concentration after the maximum has passed.</p>
<p>That assumption broke down in the Xi&#8217;an experiments. Over a 36-hour batch fermentation, the researchers tracked three variables: biomass, the concentration of γ-PGA, and the concentration of glucose, the carbon source feeding the whole process. Bacterial growth followed the familiar sigmoidal pattern, with a maximum specific growth rate of 0.7362 per hour and a peak biomass concentration of 1.82 grams per liter in dry cell weight. γ-PGA production climbed steadily to a maximum of 18.76 grams per liter. But then something the classical model could not handle occurred: as glucose became depleted and the culture entered carbon-starved conditions, the γ-PGA concentration declined modestly. The product was not stable; the fermentation was asymmetric, with accumulation on the way up and losses on the way down.</p>
<p>To understand exactly how the classical model failed, the team did something clever. They built a diagnostic extension of the L-LP framework by adding a first-order product degradation term, essentially allowing the model to subtract a quantity of γ-PGA proportional to how much was already present. This modification was not meant to be the final answer; it was a probe, designed to quantify how much of the mismatch between the standard model and the real data could be attributed to the post-peak decline. By comparing the extended and unextended L-LP models, the researchers could confirm that product degradation under carbon-depleted conditions was the key phenomenon the classical equations missed, rather than some other feature of the fermentation&#8217;s behavior.</p>
<p>The alternative the researchers evaluated came from a different branch of mathematics. The four-parameter Boltzmann model is an empirical sigmoidal function, borrowed conceptually from the curves that describe phase transitions and other smooth but sharply changing natural processes. Its four adjustable parameters let it control where the transition begins, how steeply it rises, and, crucially, what happens at the end of the curve. Where the Logistic-Luedeking-Piret system forces the product concentration to level off at its peak value forever, the Boltzmann formulation has the flexibility to represent a near-plateau phase that does not behave like a perfect plateau, including the subtle late-stage sag in γ-PGA concentration as glucose ran out.</p>
<p>The quantitative comparison between the two frameworks was striking. For biomass accumulation, the Boltzmann model matched the Logistic model almost exactly, with both achieving a coefficient of determination of roughly 0.99, meaning they explained 99 percent of the variance in the growth data. Biomass, in other words, is the easy part; the classic sigmoidal description remains fully adequate. But for the product and the substrate, the picture changed dramatically. The Boltzmann model reduced the root-mean-square error, a standard measure of average prediction error, by approximately 45 percent for γ-PGA and 47 percent for glucose relative to the classical model, while also lowering the error for biomass by about 10 percent.</p>
<p>Information-theoretic criteria reinforced the verdict. The researchers used Akaike&#8217;s Information Criterion, or AIC, a statistical tool that balances how well a model fits the data against how many parameters it consumes, penalizing unnecessary complexity. Even though the Boltzmann model uses four parameters per curve, it won decisively: the AIC difference in favor of the Boltzmann description reached 11.72 for γ-PGA and 12.70 for glucose. In the conventions of model selection, differences of this size constitute strong evidence that the better-fitting model is genuinely superior, not merely a fluke of extra flexibility. For process engineers, that means the Boltzmann approach is not just fitting noise; it is capturing real structure in the fermentation dynamics that the classical framework is blind to.</p>
<p>The study is honest about the limits of the new approach. The Boltzmann model reproduced the near-plateau phase of γ-PGA accumulation more accurately than the classical equations, but it did not fully capture the slight decrease in product concentration at the very end of the run. The diagnostic L-LP extension with a degradation term still played a valuable role in explaining why that decline happens, pointing to enzymatic or metabolic consumption of the polymer once the carbon source is gone. In other words, the Boltzmann model is the better empirical tool for prediction, while the degradation-extended L-LP framework serves as a mechanistic hypothesis about what the cells and their enzymes are doing when glucose disappears.</p>
<p>The practical implications extend well beyond the statistics. Because γ-PGA production is highly sensitive to fermentation conditions, and because the polymer&#8217;s high viscosity complicates mixing and oxygen transfer in industrial reactors, having a kinetic model that accurately reflects the entire batch, including the carbon-starved tail, gives process designers a quantitative foundation for optimization. The authors position their Boltzmann framework as a practical basis for subsequent process optimization and fed-batch scale-up studies, where feeding glucose at the right moments could prevent the product degradation phase entirely and push final titers higher. The work, funded by the Shaanxi Provincial Science and Technology Key Project and Xi&#8217;an Municipal research programs, is a reminder that even in a field as established as fermentation engineering, the choice of an equation can be the difference between a process that plateaus and one that reaches its true potential.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Non-linear Boltzmann kinetic modeling of poly-γ-glutamic acid batch fermentation by Bacillus subtilis natto</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Modeling the asymmetric metabolic shifts in poly-γ-glutamic acid batch fermentation using a non-linear Boltzmann approach</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hu, S., Li, H., Wang, Y., Li, W., Shang, M., &amp; Sun, F. (2026). Modeling the asymmetric metabolic shifts in poly-γ-glutamic acid batch fermentation using a non-linear Boltzmann approach. <em>3 Biotech, 16</em>(10), Article 447. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-026-05082-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-026-05082-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-026-05082-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s13205-026-05082-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> poly-γ-glutamic acid, Bacillus subtilis natto, batch fermentation, fermentation kinetics, Boltzmann model, Logistic-Luedeking-Piret model, biopolymer, bioprocess engineering, kinetic modeling, AIC model selection, product degradation, fed-batch scale-up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">219230</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
