<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>fatty infiltration &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/fatty-infiltration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 04:39:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>AI Turns Routine Spine Scans Into a Full 3D Map of Bone and Muscle Health in Osteoporosis</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ai-turns-routine-spine-scans-into-a-full-3d-map-of-bone-and-muscle-health-in-osteoporosis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 04:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3D bone and muscle mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced diagnostic tools for skeletal health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI in musculoskeletal health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI-driven medical imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI-enhanced CT and MRI analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone mineral density]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comprehensive osteoporosis screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DXA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early detection of bone and muscle deterioration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fatty infiltration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hounsfield units]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical image segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muscle and bone health relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opportunistic screening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osteoporosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osteoporosis and sarcopenia detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osteoporosis diagnosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paraspinal muscles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarcopenia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spine imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underused osteoporosis screening methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNet3D]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=225734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A deep learning model called UNet3D converts routine lumbar CT and MRI scans into fully automated 3D measurements of vertebral bone density, paraspinal muscle volume, and fatty infiltration, revealing that muscle and bone health are tightly coupled in osteoporosis patients.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Osteoporosis has long been called a silent disease, and for good reason. Millions of people walk around with bones that are quietly thinning, unaware of the danger until a fracture forces the problem into the open. The gold-standard diagnostic test, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, or DXA, is recommended by the World Health Organization, yet it remains dramatically underused, leaving a large share of high-risk patients unscreened. Now, a research team publishing in the Journal of Advanced Research has built an artificial intelligence system that could change that calculus, turning the CT and MRI scans that patients already receive for other reasons into a comprehensive, three-dimensional report card on the health of both bone and muscle.</p>
<p>The study, led by Zhenzhen Guan, Yijin Wang, and colleagues, tackles a fundamental blind spot in musculoskeletal medicine: the intimate, two-way relationship between bone and muscle. These tissues are anatomical next-door neighbors, packed tightly along the spine, and they constantly exchange chemical and metabolic signals. When osteoporosis and sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle, strike together, patients face sharply higher rates of falls, fractures, and death. Yet most clinical assessments examine these tissues separately, and often only at a single slice of a single vertebra, a sampling strategy that misses the spatial patchiness of bone loss and the segment-by-segment variation in muscle health.</p>
<p>At the heart of the new work is a deep learning architecture the team calls UNet3D, a modified descendant of the celebrated U-Net convolutional network that has become a workhorse of medical image segmentation. The researchers confronted a classic engineering dilemma: true 3D processing of medical volumes is computationally punishing, while 2D slice-by-slice analysis loses the spatial context that matters for anatomy. Their solution was a dimensional transformation module that ingests sixteen consecutive 512-by-512 grayscale images and, through two dual-convolution operations applied before any downsampling, converts them into enriched 3D feature maps. This early-stage dimensionality reduction slashes computational cost while preserving the fine anatomical margins that a segmentation network must capture. The output is structured as a 2D categorical map with softmax activation, deliberately aligned with the DICOM format that hospitals already use, so the tool can slot into existing clinical workflows without friction.</p>
<p>The training data came from two independent centers and were filtered with unusual rigor. Of 2,700 osteoporosis patients screened at the first center, 2,320 were excluded for reasons ranging from prior anti-osteoporosis treatment to vertebral fractures, severe scoliosis, or inadequate image quality; a similar winnowing at the second center left just 30 external test patients. The final cohort comprised 410 patients with confirmed osteoporosis, defined by a DXA T-score of -2.5 or lower, aged 55 to 75, contributing 2,460 vertebral bodies across more than 76,000 CT slices and 2,050 intervertebral disc sections on MRI. Every image was annotated slice by slice by a trained annotator, then reviewed by a spine surgeon with 20 years of experience and finally by a chief physician with 30, a layered quality-control pipeline designed to give the neural network trustworthy ground truth.</p>
<p>The performance numbers are striking. On lumbar spine CT, UNet3D achieved a pixel accuracy of 0.984 and a mean intersection over union, the standard strictness metric for segmentation, of 0.760 in the internal test set, beating U-Net, U2-Net, and Mask R-CNN. On MRI, it reached a pixel accuracy of 0.973 and a mean intersection over union of 0.724 for the far harder task of delineating ten bilateral paraspinal muscles and intermuscular spaces at five disc levels, one hundred distinct labels in total. Critically, the model held up on the completely independent external test set from the second center, with mean intersection over union values of 0.741 on CT and 0.713 on MRI, evidence that the system generalizes beyond the data it was trained on rather than merely memorizing one hospital&#8217;s scanner quirks.</p>
<p>Once the vertebrae were segmented, the pipeline applied a gradient-adaptive algorithm to perform what the authors describe as oscillatory separation of cortical and cancellous bone. This matters because osteoporotic changes are concentrated in trabecular bone, the spongy interior lattice whose metabolic activity runs roughly eight times faster than that of the dense cortical shell. Traditional threshold-based methods struggle to find that boundary in osteoporotic patients, where differential bone loss blurs the distinction and partial volume effects corrupt the measurement. Instead of a small manual region of interest in one vertebra, the system computes Hounsfield unit values across the entire vertebral volume of interest for every level from L1 to S1, capturing the spatial heterogeneity of bone mineral density. The resulting values correlated strongly with DXA T-scores at L1 through L4, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.85 to 0.93, validating the automated measurement against the clinical reference standard.</p>
<p>On the MRI side, the team faced a data limitation: their annotations covered only the intervertebral disc levels, not the full muscle continuum. Their workaround was elegant, parameterizing the 2D cross-sectional anatomy at each disc level and then spatially integrating those sections using a CT-MRI co-registration framework to reconstruct the complete L1-to-S1 continuum of muscles and the fat-filled gaps between them. The volumetric census that emerged was richly detailed. The psoas major claimed the largest total bilateral volume at roughly 173,000 cubic millimeters, while the quadratus lumborum was the smallest. The muscles and spaces showed distinct craniocaudal patterns: the longissimus peaked at L1-L2 and shrank toward the sacrum, the multifidus followed a biphasic rise-and-fall, and the psoas dominated the upper lumbar segments. Marked left-right asymmetries appeared throughout, with the most dramatic imbalances concentrated at the L4-L5 level, where some left-to-right volume ratios exceeded 25-fold.</p>
<p>The statistical payoff came when the team linked the two modalities. Using a multivariate linear regression model with Z-score standardization, they found that paraspinal muscle volumes were positively correlated with vertebral Hounsfield unit values, while intermuscular space volumes were inversely correlated, a pattern that held more strongly on the left side and in the upper lumbar segments. Among individual muscles, the multifidus, longissimus, and iliocostalis showed the strongest associations with bone density, and among the spaces, the gaps between the longissimus and multifidus, the iliocostalis and longissimus, and the multifidus and vertebral lamina carried the strongest signals. Enlarged intermuscular spaces, the authors note, likely reflect atrophy of the adjacent muscles, so the shrinking muscle and widening gap tell the same story from two directions. The team also quantified fatty infiltration using automated optical inspection and found a significant inverse relationship between fat in the paraspinal muscles and vertebral bone density, with the multifidus and psoas showing the strongest negative correlations.</p>
<p>That fat finding carries real biological weight. When adipose tissue infiltrates muscle, it directly replaces contractile fibers, degrading muscle quality and strength, which in turn weakens the mechanical stimulation that bones need to maintain their mass. Fat also secretes inflammatory cytokines that stoke chronic inflammation in the bone microenvironment, activating osteoclasts, the cells that resorb bone, and accelerating bone loss. The synergy between failing muscle and brittle bone elevates the risk and severity of vertebral fractures, and patients with the combined condition of osteosarcopenia face higher rates of frailty, disability, and falls. The segment-specific correlations observed here hint that different spinal levels experience unique mechanical loading from their adjacent muscles, suggesting that regional variation, not a single averaged measurement, should guide how clinicians interpret bone-muscle relationships in the lumbosacral spine.</p>
<p>The researchers are candid about the limitations. The study is retrospective, which invites selection bias; DXA, as a 2D projection technique, has inherent constraints as a reference standard even though quantitative CT remains too costly, radiologically heavy, and scarce to serve that role here; and the cohort consisted exclusively of osteoporosis patients in one spinal region, without accounting for confounders like nutrition or physical activity. Future work will incorporate quantitative CT calibration, Dixon water-fat sequences, more diverse populations, and extension to the thoracic and cervical spine through transfer learning. Still, the vision is compelling: an automated tool that transforms scans already sitting in hospital archives into objective, three-dimensional musculoskeletal metrics, enabling opportunistic screening of the many patients whose osteoporosis would otherwise go undetected until a bone breaks. In a rapidly aging world, that kind of quiet, early warning system could prove to be exactly what the silent disease has been waiting for.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A deep learning model for automated 3D quantification of vertebral bone density and paraspinal muscle metrics from routine CT and MRI in osteoporosis patients</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Construction of musculoskeletal quantitative model based on deep learning and study of musculoskeletal relationship in patients with osteoporosis</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Guan, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Chen, Y., &amp; Lu, X. (2026). Construction of musculoskeletal quantitative model based on deep learning and study of musculoskeletal relationship in patients with osteoporosis. <em>Journal of Advanced Research, 88</em>, 899-909. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2026.01.037" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2026.01.037</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2026.01.037" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.jare.2026.01.037</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> osteoporosis, deep learning, UNet3D, medical image segmentation, paraspinal muscles, bone mineral density, DXA, Hounsfield units, sarcopenia, fatty infiltration, spine imaging, opportunistic screening</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">225734</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muscle Strains Leave Lasting Fat Deposits That Rehabilitation Cannot Reverse</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/muscle-strains-leave-lasting-fat-deposits-that-rehabilitation-cannot-reverse/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 22:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aponeurosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calf injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenges in reversing muscle fat accumulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIXON imaging for muscle fat quantification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DIXON MRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of muscle fat deposits on athletic performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fat fraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fatty infiltration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hamstring injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of fat deposits on muscle recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term consequences of muscle tears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term effects of muscle strains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic resonance imaging in muscle injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muscle fat infiltration after injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muscle quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muscle strain injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muscle tissue healing process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muscle volume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persistent fatty infiltration post-rehabilitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[re-injury rates in sports injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rehabilitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reinjury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sports injury rehabilitation limitations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=199208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new MRI study shows that muscle strain injuries trigger a rapid and persistent accumulation of fat within the injured tissue that lasts at least a year despite full return to sport.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muscle strains are among the most common injuries in sport, striking everyone from weekend joggers to elite professionals, and they carry one of the highest re-injury rates of any athletic condition. When a strained muscle tears away from its tendon or aponeurosis, the hope among athletes and clinicians alike is that time, rest and rehabilitation will restore the tissue to something close to its original state. A new study challenges that assumption in an unexpected way, showing that injured muscles quietly accumulate fat within three months of the injury and that this fatty infiltration persists for at least a year, even in people who have returned to full sports participation.</p>
<p>The research, published in Physiological Reports, followed 50 sports-active men and women who suffered acute strain injuries to either the calf or hamstring muscles. Using a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging technique called DIXON, the team measured the fat fraction of the entire injured muscle volume in the first week after injury, then again at three months and twelve months post-injury. DIXON imaging separates water and fat signals within tissue, generating water-only and fat-only images that allow researchers to calculate precisely how much of a muscle&#8217;s volume is occupied by fat rather than contractile tissue.</p>
<p>The findings were striking in their clarity. Acutely after injury, there was no measurable difference in fat content between the injured and uninjured legs. But by three months, the injured muscles showed significantly higher fat fractions than their healthy counterparts, and this elevation remained unchanged at the twelve-month follow-up. The uninjured legs showed no such change across the entire year, confirming that the effect was specific to the damaged tissue. Notably, all participants had returned to full sports participation at a median of 48 days after injury, meaning the persistent fat accumulation occurred despite active loading and rehabilitation of the muscles.</p>
<p>The study also uncovered meaningful relationships between fat accumulation and other measures of injury severity. Muscle volume loss correlated negatively with the rise in fat content between the acute scan and the three-month follow-up, suggesting that the more contractile tissue a muscle loses, the more fat it accumulates in its place. The team additionally found a positive correlation between enlargement of the aponeurosis, the fibrous sheet into which muscle fascicles insert, and the increase in fat fraction at three months. This hints at a deeper story about how the muscle and its connective tissue framework fail to re-establish their normal mechanical coupling after injury.</p>
<p>Previous work had already hinted at lasting structural changes after strain injuries. Tissue biopsies from previously injured muscles have shown fat accumulation both inside and between muscle cells that could not be reversed by three months of rehabilitation training, and electron microscopy of chronic injury sites has revealed a loss of contractile elements. Ultrasound imaging has further suggested that muscle fascicles at the injury site fail to contract normally, instead being passively dragged along by the aponeurosis during movement. The new imaging data extend these observations to the whole-muscle level and establish a clear timeline for when fatty infiltration first appears.</p>
<p>The researchers propose that a fundamental defect at the muscle-aponeurosis interface may drive the process. When muscle fascicles cannot generate proper tension at their insertion points, the biomechanical cues within the tissue change, potentially altering the behavior of resident cells. Fibro/adipogenic progenitors, a heterogeneous population of cells capable of differentiating into either fat or fibrous tissue, have been implicated in fatty infiltration in animal models. Whether these cells are responsible for the fat accumulation seen in human strain injuries remains unknown, but the persistent, seemingly irreversible nature of the change points to a fundamental shift in the local cellular environment rather than a simple consequence of disuse.</p>
<p>The clinical implications are significant. Fatty infiltration is recognized as a major contributor to impaired muscle quality and is a strong predictor of poor recovery and high recurrence rates in rotator cuff tears. If similar processes operate in the hamstring and calf muscles, where re-injury rates are notoriously high, the persistent fat accumulation documented here could help explain why so many athletes suffer repeated strains at the same site. The current findings suggest that rehabilitation protocols may need to address not just strength and flexibility but the underlying structural integrity of the muscle-tendon unit.</p>
<p>One of the study&#8217;s key methodological strengths was its measurement of fat across the entire three-dimensional muscle volume rather than in a single representative slice, an approach that other work has shown is more reliable for capturing the true extent of infiltration. The team also took care to exclude the outer edge of the muscle near subcutaneous fat deposits to ensure that only intramuscular fat was quantified. The researchers acknowledge certain limitations, including the resolution limits of the DIXON technique at the low fat fractions observed and the inability to analyse fat distribution at the specific injury site, which could hypothetically show even greater local accumulation.</p>
<p>Looking ahead, the team emphasises that the cellular mechanisms underlying this rapid and persistent fatty infiltration remain poorly understood. Future work will need to determine whether affected muscle fibres retain their nerve supply, whether they can generate contractile force, and how the interplay between mechanical loading, connective tissue structure and progenitor cell behaviour drives the process. For now, the message for athletes and clinicians is sobering: a muscle strain leaves a measurable metabolic and structural fingerprint that persists long after the pain has gone and normal training has resumed, and current rehabilitation approaches may not be sufficient to prevent it.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Persistent fatty infiltration in skeletal muscle following acute strain injuries in sports-active adults</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Early and persisting increase in fat content after human muscle strain injuries in adults</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Bayer, M. L., Mertz, K. H., Eriksen, A. S., Kjaer, M., Magnusson, S. P., Linden, F. H., &amp; Svensson, R. B. (2026). Early and persisting increase in fat content after human muscle strain injuries in adults. <em>Physiological Reports, 14</em>(17), Article e71086. <a href="https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.71086" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.71086</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.71086" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.14814/phy2.71086</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> muscle strain injury, fatty infiltration, DIXON MRI, aponeurosis, hamstring injury, calf injury, sports injury, muscle volume, fat fraction, rehabilitation, reinjury, muscle quality</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199208</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
