The research team, led by Haiping Liao and colleagues, framed their work around the dual-factor model of mental health, a framework that treats psychological well-being as more than the absence of symptoms. In this view, a complete picture of adolescent mental health requires measuring both distress indicators, such as depression and anxiety, and positive indicators, such as life satisfaction. A teenager free of depressive symptoms is not necessarily flourishing, and a seemingly happy adolescent may still carry significant internal struggles. The researchers used this model as a conceptual orientation, measuring depression, anxiety, and life satisfaction separately rather than jointly classifying participants into dual-factor categories.

The statistical architecture of the study centered on mediation analysis, a technique that tests whether a third variable explains the pathway between a cause and an effect. Here, the direct association between parent-child communication and each mental health indicator was compared against indirect routes running through emotional intelligence, the capacity to perceive, understand, and regulate emotions, and through interpersonal distress, the strain adolescents experience in their social relationships. Three separate outcome-specific models were estimated, one for each indicator, allowing the team to see whether the same family communication signal produced different downstream effects depending on the outcome measured.

The direct associations were substantial. Better parent-child communication was significantly associated with lower depression, with a standardized coefficient of -0.46, and lower anxiety, at -0.41. It was also linked to higher life satisfaction, with a coefficient of 0.49. In standardized terms, these are moderate to strong effects for survey research of this kind, suggesting that the quality of everyday exchanges between parents and adolescents is meaningfully entwined with how teenagers feel about themselves and their lives.

But the indirect pathways proved equally revealing. Emotional intelligence and interpersonal distress together carried a meaningful share of the total association between communication and each outcome. For depression, the combined indirect effect was -0.24; for anxiety, -0.26; and for life satisfaction, 0.14. In practical terms, this means that a considerable fraction of the link between family communication and adolescent mental health operates through internal mechanisms: adolescents who communicate well with parents tend to develop stronger emotional skills, and those skills appear to buffer against symptoms while supporting well-being.

The study also uncovered a serial mediation pathway, a longer causal chain in which parent-child communication first builds emotional intelligence, which then reduces interpersonal distress, which in turn improves mental health outcomes. This serial route was statistically significant for all three indicators, with effect sizes of -0.04 for depression, -0.04 for anxiety, and 0.01 for life satisfaction. The serial pathway accounted for 8.70 percent of the total effect on depression, 9.76 percent on anxiety, and 2.04 percent on life satisfaction. Though individually modest, these percentages describe a specific psychological sequence: family conversation quality may cultivate emotional competence, which then eases social friction, which finally lightens the adolescent’s emotional burden.

This chain has theoretical appeal because it aligns with established developmental science. Adolescence is widely regarded as a sensitive period for sociocultural processing, when the brain’s social circuitry is especially responsive to interpersonal experience. Family communication during this window may function as a training ground for emotional regulation, teaching adolescents how to name feelings, tolerate ambiguity, and repair relational ruptures. Those skills, in turn, could reduce the misunderstandings and conflicts that generate interpersonal distress with peers, teachers, and family members alike.

The measurement tools anchored the findings in validated instruments. Parent-child communication was assessed with a scale originally developed by Barnes and Olson, depression was screened using instruments validated in Chinese populations, anxiety was measured with standardized symptom scales, and life satisfaction was captured with the widely used Satisfaction with Life Scale. Emotional intelligence was measured with an established self-report instrument, and interpersonal distress was assessed with a Chinese-developed inventory. The researchers also took steps to address common method biases, a known threat in single-wave questionnaire studies where all data come from the same respondents at the same time.

The authors are careful about the limits of their design. Because the data are cross-sectional, the direction of influence cannot be definitively established; it is possible that adolescents with better emotional skills and fewer social difficulties also communicate more openly with their parents, or that the relationships are bidirectional. Moreover, because the analyses modeled the three mental health indicators separately rather than jointly defining dual-factor mental health status, the findings should be read as evidence informed by the dual-factor model rather than as a direct analytical test of it. The sample, drawn from Chinese junior and senior high schools, also raises questions about cultural generalizability, though prior cross-cultural work has found links between parent-adolescent communication and adolescent psychological problems across 12 cultural groups.

For parents, educators, and clinicians, the practical implication is that conversations at home may do more than convey information; they may build the emotional and social machinery that adolescents carry into every other relationship. Programs aimed at improving family communication could plausibly strengthen emotional intelligence and reduce interpersonal distress, with downstream benefits for both symptom reduction and well-being enhancement. As adolescent mental health concerns continue to rise globally, this study adds a granular piece to the puzzle: the pathway from a family’s daily dialogue to a teenager’s inner life runs, at least in part, through the emotions they learn to manage and the social tensions they learn to navigate.

Subject of Research: The mediating roles of emotional intelligence and interpersonal distress in the association between parent-child communication and adolescent mental health

Article Title: Adolescent parent-child communication and mental health: The mediating role of emotional intelligence and interpersonal distress

Article References: Liao, H., Lu, Y., Zou, X., Liu, S., & Yuan, J. (2026). Adolescent parent-child communication and mental health: The mediating role of emotional intelligence and interpersonal distress. Current Psychology, 45(17), Article 1426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-026-09923-8

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s12144-026-09923-8

Keywords: adolescent mental health, parent-child communication, emotional intelligence, interpersonal distress, depression, anxiety, life satisfaction, dual-factor model, mediation analysis, Chinese adolescents, Current Psychology, family communication