<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>European Research Council PROMINENT project &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/european-research-council-prominent-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 13:36:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Solar Rain and Prominences: How the Sun&#8217;s Million-Degree Corona Cools and Erupts</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/solar-rain-and-prominences-how-the-suns-million-degree-corona-cools-and-erupts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 13:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromospheric and transition-region temperatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronal cooling processes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coronal Mass Ejections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronal rain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Research Council PROMINENT project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot and cool plasma interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MHD simulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plasma condensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prominence formation and eruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prominences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiative transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SDO/AIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar atmospheric layers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Corona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar eruptions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar filaments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar physics research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar prominences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal instability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal non-equilibrium]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=238232</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new collection of studies shows that coronal rain, prominences, and solar eruptions are connected expressions of the same cooling and condensation physics in the Sun's outer atmosphere.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The solar corona is usually discussed in terms of one of astrophysics&#8217; great puzzles: why the Sun&#8217;s outer atmosphere reaches temperatures of more than a million degrees while its visible surface simmers at a mere 5,500. Yet a growing body of research argues that the opposite process deserves equal attention. The corona is not a uniformly hot haze. Embedded within it are islands of cool, dense plasma at chromospheric and transition-region temperatures, appearing most dramatically as coronal rain, prominences, and their disk counterparts, filaments. A new Topical Collection in the journals Solar Physics and Living Reviews in Solar Physics, assembled around the Coronal Cooling Conference held in Leuven, Belgium, in May 2024 and the legacy of the European Research Council&#8217;s PROMINENT project, gathers eleven peer-reviewed research and review papers that together map how hot, tenuous plasma condenses into cool material, how that material survives, drains, or erupts, and how the whole cycle couples the corona to the layers beneath it.</p>
<p>The central message of the collection is that coronal rain and prominences, long treated as separate phenomena, are in fact closely related expressions of the same underlying physics: coronal condensation. Whether a cooling clump of plasma falls back to the solar surface as rain or hangs suspended for days as a prominence depends largely on the magnetic topology in which it forms. Condensations that form in closed, steeply curved loops tend to drain rapidly along field lines as rain, while those that settle into magnetic dips can remain buoyantly supported as prominences. Their different lifetimes and appearances are therefore not arbitrary but are dictated by the interplay of radiative losses, heating, gravity, flows, and magnetic forces, all acting on plasma that spans several orders of magnitude in temperature and density.</p>
<p>The theoretical foundation is revisited by Thomas Waters and Andrew Stricklan, who re-examine the radiative cooling of optically thin plasma and identify a catastrophic cooling mode distinct from the classical thermal instability. This mode is governed by the isochoric instability criterion, which applies to plasma compressed at constant volume, and crucially it cannot be stabilized by thermal conduction. That means condensations can form under conditions where conventional thermal-instability arguments would predict a stable equilibrium. The result widens the theoretical window within which rapid cooling in hot, low-density plasmas should be interpreted, and it may explain observations of abrupt, near-catastrophic temperature drops in coronal loops that standard theory has struggled to accommodate.</p>
<p>A sweeping theoretical and numerical perspective comes from Rony Keppens, Yuhang Zhou, and Chengcai Xia, whose review places prominences and coronal rain within a unified framework of multiphase coronal plasma. They trace how gravity, flows, heating prescriptions, and magnetic topology shape both the linear growth of instabilities and their full nonlinear magnetohydrodynamic evolution. Their assessment is candid about what remains unsolved: the fine structure of prominences, their internal dynamics, and their complete life cycle from birth to eruption remain major challenges for numerical studies. Complementing this, Valeriia Liakh and Jack Jenkins review a decade and a half of prominence and coronal rain modeling with the open-source MPI-AMRVAC code, following the progression from simplified one-dimensional setups to multidimensional simulations that self-consistently produce cool condensations, and charting a path toward three-dimensional models that include partial ionization, realistic radiative transfer, and the full mass cycle between chromosphere and corona.</p>
<p>Radiation becomes a formidable complication once plasma cools enough to become optically thick, because photons can then be absorbed as well as emitted. Petr Heinzel and colleagues demonstrate through non-local thermodynamic equilibrium, or non-LTE, radiative transfer calculations that the optically thin loss functions commonly used in simulations break down for cool, dense condensations. Realistic net radiative rates must include both losses and gains from the absorption of incident radiation, and their models quantify how condensations relax toward radiative equilibrium on timescales that depend on plasma pressure and geometric thickness. In a companion review, Heinzel and Stanislav Gunár survey five decades of non-LTE prominence modeling, from one-dimensional slabs to two-dimensional and emerging three-dimensional multi-thread structures, and argue that coupling dynamic MHD models with multidimensional radiative transfer is now essential for interpreting rapidly moving eruptive prominences captured by modern instruments.</p>
<p>On the observational side, disentangling emission from plasma at wildly different temperatures along the same line of sight is the central challenge. Paolo Antolin and colleagues extend a technique called Response Fitting to separate cool, warm, and hot contributions within several passbands of the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly on the Solar Dynamics Observatory and the slit-jaw imager of the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph. The method improves the decomposition of the AIA 94 and 304 angstrom channels and allows the hot Fe XXI flare emission contaminating the IRIS 1330 and 1400 angstrom passbands to be estimated. Applied to a joint AIA-IRIS observation, it reveals an approximately seven-fold increase in cool plasma associated with flare-driven coronal rain, and because it is computationally efficient it opens the door to near-real-time thermal diagnostics of the solar atmosphere.</p>
<p>That diagnostic power is already yielding surprises. Seray Şahin and Paolo Antolin used IRIS and SDO/AIA observations of coronal-rain showers neighboring a modest C7.5 flare to test whether a flare can influence loops that are not themselves flaring. They compared the amount, intensity, and velocity of rain across the pre-flare, impulsive, and gradual phases, finding that the number of detected rain events rose by roughly 27 percent from the pre-flare to the impulsive phase, while average intensity and downflow velocity increased by about 17 and 18 percent respectively by the gradual phase. The implication is striking: a flare can alter the thermodynamic conditions of neighboring, apparently quiescent loops, and the tidy distinction between quiescent and flare-driven coronal rain is not always clear-cut.</p>
<p>Thermal non-equilibrium, in which plasma on closed loops undergoes repeated cycles of heating, cooling, and condensation, has also now been caught operating far beyond its usual habitat. Clara Froment and Sophie Masson report long-period extreme-ultraviolet pulsations and recurring coronal-rain showers in a non-eruptive pseudo-streamer observed over roughly two and a half days with SDO/AIA. The ordering of the EUV emission peaks and the appearance of rain near the end of each cooling cycle provide strong evidence for thermal non-equilibrium cycles occurring both beneath the pseudo-streamer dome and in regions dominated by open or large-scale magnetic fields. Continuous interchange reconnection accompanied the evolution, suggesting that the interaction between reconnection and thermal non-equilibrium may govern how condensations are released and transported near open-closed magnetic boundaries, with possible consequences for the solar wind itself.</p>
<p>Two further studies round out the physical picture. Pengfei Chen introduces the evocatively named concept of solar filament physiognomy, the practice of inferring magnetic properties from the appearance and fine structure of filaments in imaging observations, a valuable complement in an era when direct measurements of the coronal magnetic field remain difficult. Lorenzo Melis and Roberto Soler analyze the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability at the interface between partially ionized prominence plasma and the fully ionized corona, showing that compressibility and acoustic effects matter at observed flow speeds and that ambipolar diffusion generally destabilizes the interface, lowering the threshold velocity and broadening the unstable parameter range. And Yuhong Fan&#8217;s review of MHD simulations of prominence-forming flux ropes demonstrates that prominence material is no passive tracer: its weight modifies the equilibrium, stability, and eruptive evolution of the flux rope that hosts it, ultimately shaping coronal mass ejections.</p>
<p>Taken together, the collection sketches a field in transition, where observers, theorists, and modelers converge on a single coupled system. Future models must move toward fully three-dimensional treatments that combine MHD with non-LTE radiative transfer, non-equilibrium ionization, and multi-fluid effects, while synthetic observables will be essential for meaningful comparison with the rapidly improving data from the Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope, Solar Orbiter, and Proba-3. The ultimate goal is to follow condensations continuously, from their thermodynamic formation through their drainage, suspension, or eruption, and thereby assemble a comprehensive picture of the coronal mass and energy cycle. In that picture, the rain that falls through the Sun&#8217;s corona and the great crimson prominences that arch above its limb are not curiosities but signposts pointing to the same fundamental physics.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Coronal cooling and the formation, evolution, and eruption of cool plasma in the solar corona</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Coronal Cooling: Rain, Prominences, and Eruptions – Editorial</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Şahin, S., Druett, M. K., Liakh, V., Popescu Braileanu, B., &amp; Rees-Crockford, T. (2026). Coronal Cooling: Rain, Prominences, and Eruptions – Editorial. <em>Solar Physics, 301</em>(10), Article 151. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-026-02746-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-026-02746-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-026-02746-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11207-026-02746-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> solar physics, coronal rain, prominences, solar filaments, thermal instability, radiative transfer, MHD simulations, coronal mass ejections, SDO/AIA, IRIS, thermal non-equilibrium, solar corona</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">238232</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
