<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ESIPT &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/esipt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 08:08:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Why Metal Ions Make Fluorescent Probes Glow or Go Dark: New Design Rules Emerge</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/why-metal-ions-make-fluorescent-probes-glow-or-go-dark-new-design-rules-emerge/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 08:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregation-induced emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytical techniques for metal ion analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioimaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chelation-enhanced fluorescence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFT calculations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental metal ion monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enzyme activity and metal ions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESIPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorescence turn-on sensors for metal ions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorescence-based metal ion detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorescent probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metal toxicity detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intramolecular charge transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mercury detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal ion fluorescent probes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal ion sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal ion sensing in biological systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal ion-induced fluorescence quenching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neurodegenerative disease biomarkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic fluorescent sensor design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photoinduced electron transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redox regulation and metal ion sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zinc detection]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=261646</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review argues that fluorescent metal-ion probes succeed or fail based on whether their photophysical mechanism matches the electronic structure of the target ion, from paramagnetic copper to diamagnetic zinc and toxic mercury and lead.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metal ions are everywhere in biology and the environment, and telling them apart quickly and cheaply has long been a challenge for chemists. A new open-access review published in Discover Chemistry by M. S. Ajay Kumar, Pradeep Bhaskar, and B. Anindita of Presidency University in Bengaluru takes a fresh look at one of the most versatile tools in the detection toolbox: organic fluorescent probes. Rather than simply cataloguing probes and their detection limits, the review argues that the real key to building better sensors lies in understanding why different metal ions produce fundamentally different fluorescence responses, from brilliant turn-on emission to complete quenching.</p>
<p>The stakes are high. Essential ions such as copper, zinc, and iron participate in enzymatic catalysis, cellular signaling, redox regulation, and gene expression, but when their balance is disrupted they can contribute to oxidative stress, metabolic disorders, and neurodegenerative diseases. Toxic heavy metals such as mercury and lead offer no biological benefit at all and are hazardous even at trace levels because of their persistence, bioaccumulation, and long biological half-lives. Conventional analytical techniques like atomic absorption spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry deliver excellent accuracy, but they demand expensive instruments, trained personnel, and complex sample preparation, making them poorly suited for real-time or on-site detection. Fluorescent probes, which convert metal-ligand interactions into measurable optical signals, promise something different: fast, simple, and biologically compatible sensing.</p>
<p>The central insight of the review is that probe performance depends not only on the fluorophore but on the compatibility between the target ion and the sensing mechanism. Paramagnetic ions such as Cu2+ and Fe3+ usually promote fluorescence quenching through non-radiative decay, intersystem crossing, and charge-transfer pathways. Diamagnetic Zn2+, by contrast, more readily supports turn-on emission through suppression of photoinduced electron transfer, known as PET, and chelation-induced rigidification of the molecular framework. Soft heavy metals such as Hg2+ and Pb2+ occupy a middle ground: they bind strongly to carefully selected donor atoms, yet their heavy-atom character can trigger spin-orbit coupling that quenches emission, so designers must balance strong binding against signal reliability.</p>
<p>The authors walk through the major photophysical mechanisms one by one. PET-based probes contain an electron-rich donor unit that quenches the excited fluorophore in the free state; when a metal ion coordinates to the donor, the electron-transfer pathway is blocked and fluorescence returns. This OFF-ON switching works beautifully for closed-shell d10 ions like Zn2+ but often fails for paramagnetic targets, where suppressing PET merely opens the door to stronger quenching routes such as ligand-to-metal charge transfer. Intramolecular charge transfer, or ICT, systems integrate the binding site directly into the conjugated framework, producing wavelength shifts that enable ratiometric sensing, a more reliable readout than simple intensity changes because it reduces dependence on probe concentration and excitation conditions. Twisted intramolecular charge transfer adds a conformational dimension: metal coordination can restrict torsional motion, suppressing non-emissive twisted states and boosting emission.</p>
<p>Chelation-enhanced fluorescence and its counterpart, chelation-enhanced quenching, are presented not as separate mechanisms but as opposite outcomes of the same coordination event. When metal binding locks a flexible ligand into a rigid, planar geometry, non-radiative decay is suppressed and brightness increases; when the bound ion instead introduces intersystem crossing or electron transfer, the same binding event extinguishes the signal. Excited-state intramolecular proton transfer, or ESIPT, offers another elegant route: photoexcitation drives a proton from a donor group to a nearby acceptor, generating a keto tautomer with a much larger Stokes shift. Metal ions can either disrupt the hydrogen bond required for this process or stabilize it, giving designers a tunable switch between enol and keto emission bands.</p>
<p>The review also highlights through-bond energy transfer, an emerging mechanism in which excitation energy moves along a covalently linked donor-acceptor backbone rather than through space as in FRET. Because TBET does not require strict spectral overlap or precise donor-acceptor distances, it can generate large pseudo-Stokes shifts and support ratiometric, multi-channel detection. A representative Hg2+-responsive cassette shows weak emission in the OFF state but strong acceptor fluorescence once metal binding enhances electronic communication between the chromophores. The authors caution, however, that TBET systems demand precise molecular architecture and often struggle with aggregation-induced quenching in water.</p>
<p>Computational chemistry receives a notably critical treatment. Density functional theory and time-dependent DFT are now standard in probe studies, but the authors argue their value is frequently squandered on decorative HOMO-LUMO diagrams. Used properly, ground-state DFT can confirm binding sites, coordination geometry, and structural rearrangements such as rigidification or ring opening, while TD-DFT can assign whether an observed transition is locally excited, charge-transfer, or ligand-to-metal in character. The review stresses that a smaller HOMO-LUMO gap alone proves nothing; orbital localization, charge-transfer direction, and experimental fluorescence output must all be correlated. Method choice matters too: hybrid functionals like B3LYP suit organic fluorophores, while effective core potential basis sets such as LANL2DZ are needed for heavy metals, and long-range corrected functionals like CAM-B3LYP or omega-B97XD better describe charge-transfer states.</p>
<p>Metal-by-metal, the review distills design lessons from dozens of representative probes. For Cu2+, quenching dominates because of its paramagnetic d9 configuration, with peptide-based probes reaching detection limits as low as 1.5 nanomolar, while rhodamine ring-opening and ratiometric platforms offer turn-on and quantitative alternatives. Iron sensing is even harder because Fe3+ is a hard, highly charged, paramagnetic d5 ion that promotes ligand-to-metal charge transfer, so most probes are turn-off or colorimetric. Zn2+ is the friendliest target: ratiometric and turn-on probes routinely achieve low-nanomolar detection in seconds, though discriminating Zn2+ from its fellow d10 ion Cd2+ remains the field&#8217;s stubborn challenge. For Hg2+ and Pb2+, the standout performers combine aggregation-induced emission, near-infrared output, and ratiometric readout, with some systems reporting detection limits down to the picomolar range in water, food, and living cells.</p>
<p>The application landscape is shifting rapidly from bench-top demonstrations to real-world deployment. Recent probes have been validated in tap water, groundwater, river water, milk, soil, fruit juice, and plant tissues, with recovery values typically between 90 and 102 percent. Smartphone-assisted detection, 3D-printed sensing devices, and paper test strips are turning molecular recognition into field-ready tools. In bioimaging, ratiometric probes have tracked intracellular Cu2+ in HeLa cells, an AIE probe with a 130-nanometer Stokes shift visualized Hg2+ in A549 cells and in the roots of rice plants, and a peptide-based self-assembling system detected Pb2+ in groundwater and living cells below 10 nanomolar. Nitrogen and sulfur co-doped carbon dots have even combined metal sensing with logic-gate behavior in a single platform.</p>
<p>Significant hurdles remain before fluorescent probes fulfill their promise. Absolute selectivity in complex matrices is still elusive, because borderline and soft ions such as Pb2+, Hg2+, and Cd2+ exhibit overlapping coordination behavior. Quantitative accuracy inside cells is compromised by probe distribution, intracellular heterogeneity, and interference from endogenous biomolecules like glutathione. Many probes lack reversibility, subcellular targeting, or the long-term stability needed for continuous monitoring. The review&#8217;s closing message is clear and likely to shape the next generation of research: successful probes must be mechanism-guided rather than structure-driven, matching the electronic personality of each metal ion with the right signal-transduction pathway, and validated not under ideal laboratory conditions but in the messy, competitive environments where metal ions actually matter.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Organic fluorescent probes for detecting metal ions through mechanism-guided photophysical design and bioimaging</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Organic fluorescent metal ion probes for understanding design rules photophysical mechanisms and bioimaging applications</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ajay Kumar, M. S., Bhaskar, P., &amp; Anindita, B. (2026). Organic fluorescent metal ion probes for understanding design rules photophysical mechanisms and bioimaging applications. <em>Discover Chemistry, 3</em>(1), Article 472. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44371-026-00857-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44371-026-00857-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44371-026-00857-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44371-026-00857-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> fluorescent probes, metal ion sensing, photoinduced electron transfer, intramolecular charge transfer, ESIPT, chelation-enhanced fluorescence, aggregation-induced emission, DFT calculations, zinc detection, mercury detection, lead detection, bioimaging</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">261646</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solvent Polarity Steers Double Proton Transfer in a Promising OLED Fluorophore</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/solvent-polarity-steers-double-proton-transfer-in-a-promising-oled-fluorophore/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 22:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological probes using ESIPT compounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bipyridyl-derivative fluorophores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bipyridyl-diol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charge redistribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational study of proton transfer mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESDPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESIPT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESIPT in OLED fluorophores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorophore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen bonding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen bonding in luminescent molecules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular logic gates in photonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OLED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organic light-emitting diode (OLED) material design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potential energy surface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solvent influence on fluorescence properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solvent polarity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solvent polarity effects on excited-state intramolecular proton transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solvent-dependent photophysical behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stokes shift enhancement in OLEDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TDDFT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theoretical modeling of proton transfer processes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=235858</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new computational study reveals that solvent polarity strengthens dual hydrogen bonds and drives a stepwise double proton transfer in the H2BP-(OH)2DC-NH2 fluorophore, offering a route to tunable OLED materials.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some molecules do something remarkable when they absorb light: they shuffle protons internally, transforming into a different chemical form before they ever get the chance to fluoresce. This phenomenon, known as excited-state intramolecular proton transfer, or ESIPT, produces molecules that emit at two distinct wavelengths and exhibit enormous Stokes shifts, the gap between the light absorbed and the light given off. Those properties make ESIPT compounds attractive for molecular logic gates, luminescent materials, and biological probes. Now, a computational study published in the Journal of Saudi Chemical Society has dissected how the surrounding solvent can tip the scales of this delicate proton-shuttling dance in a fluorophore with real promise for organic light-emitting diode technology.</p>
<p>The research, carried out by Jiahe Chen and Jinfeng Zhao of Shenyang Normal University in China, focuses on a derivative of 2,2&#8242;-bipyridyl-3,3&#8242;-diol, a compound abbreviated H2BP-(OH)2DC-NH2. This molecule was originally designed and reported by Trannoy and co-workers, and it has already attracted attention because it emits efficiently not only in solution but also in the crystalline state, and it shows excellent electroluminescence performance, making it a candidate for OLED devices. What makes it particularly interesting to theorists is that it carries two internal hydrogen bonds, O1-H2···N3 and O4-H5···N6, each capable of shuttling a proton when the molecule is excited by light. That opens the possibility of excited-state double proton transfer, or ESDPT, in which two protons move rather than one.</p>
<p>Double proton transfer matters far beyond the chemistry of a single fluorophore. The vast majority of reactions in biological systems involve the transfer of multiple protons, so a single-proton model is simply too crude to capture the intricacies of processes such as those that stabilize DNA or drive enzyme catalysis. The history of the field dates back to 1969, when Taylor, El-Bayoumi, and Kasha provided the first experimental evidence of excited-state two-proton tautomerism in doubly hydrogen-bonded 7-azaindole dimers, observing a broad green fluorescence quite distinct from the violet glow of the monomer. Since then, researchers have worked to establish whether such double transfers happen simultaneously or step by step, a question the new study addresses directly for H2BP-(OH)2DC-NH2.</p>
<p>To probe the mechanism, the team turned to density functional theory and time-dependent density functional theory, the workhorse quantum chemical methods for studying molecules in their ground and excited states. All calculations were performed with the Gaussian 16 program using the B3LYP functional with a triple-zeta valence basis set including polarization functions, augmented with Grimme&#8217;s D3 dispersion correction to describe the weak hydrogen bond interactions accurately. The solvents themselves were modeled with the polarizable continuum model, allowing the researchers to simulate three environments of increasing polarity: cyclohexane, chloroform, and acetonitrile. Geometries were optimized without constraints in both the ground state and the first excited singlet state, and vibrational analyses confirmed that every optimized structure was a true minimum with no imaginary frequencies.</p>
<p>The first line of evidence came from geometry. When the molecule is promoted from the ground state to the first excited state, the hydrogen bonds in both O1-H2···N3 and O4-H5···N6 shorten, regardless of solvent. In cyclohexane, for example, the H2···N3 distance contracts from 1.6862 angstroms to 1.5966 angstroms, while the covalent O1-H2 and O4-H5 bonds stretch from 1.0024 angstroms to 1.0241 angstroms. The bond angles at both hydrogen-bonding sites widen from 149.26 degrees to 151.29 degrees. Shorter hydrogen bonds and larger bond angles are classic signatures of hydrogen bond strengthening, and a strengthened hydrogen bond is precisely what lowers the barrier for a proton to hop across it. The same trends, to varying degrees, appeared in chloroform and acetonitrile.</p>
<p>Spectroscopic and topological analyses reinforced the geometric picture. Simulated infrared spectra showed that the stretching frequencies of the two O-H bonds redshift markedly upon excitation, dropping from 3047.66 to 2624.12 wavenumbers in cyclohexane, from 3016.61 to 2596.64 in chloroform, and from 2989.32 to 2569.76 in acetonitrile. A redshift in an O-H stretch means the covalent bond has weakened, which happens when the hydrogen bond pulling on that proton grows stronger. The researchers also computed the electron localization function and derived from it the core-valence bifurcation index, a topological metric that correlates linearly with hydrogen bond strength. More negative CVB values in the excited state confirmed stronger hydrogen bonds, with acetonitrile showing the strongest and chloroform the weakest, hinting already that higher polarity favors proton transfer. Predicted hydrogen bond energies and electron densities at the bond critical points rose on excitation as well, and did so more dramatically in the more polar solvents.</p>
<p>Charge redistribution provided the electronic explanation for why excitation primes the molecule for proton motion. Analyzing the frontier molecular orbitals, the team found that the dominant S0 to S1 transition accounts for roughly 96.7 to 96.9 percent of the excited-state character in all three solvents, justifying their focus on this single excitation under Kasha&#8217;s rule. Charge density difference maps and electron-hole analyses revealed that upon photoexcitation, electron density shifts away from the oxygen atoms O1 and O4 and accumulates on the nitrogen atoms N3 and N6. In plain terms, the oxygens become better at letting go of their protons while the nitrogens become more eager to accept them. This photoinduced charge redistribution is a significant motivating factor for the ESIPT reaction, effectively priming both hydrogen bonds for proton transfer the moment the molecule absorbs a photon.</p>
<p>The decisive test came from mapping the potential energy surfaces. The team scanned both hydrogen bond coordinates from 0.9 to 2.1 angstroms in steps of 0.1 angstrom in both electronic states and all three solvents. In the ground state, the energy barrier climbs steadily as the O-H bonds stretch, meaning proton transfer is essentially shut down before excitation. In the excited state, the landscape transforms completely. Comparing the direct pathway in which both protons move at once against the stepwise route in which one proton transfers first and the second follows, the stepwise path consistently presents smaller barriers. In acetonitrile, the barriers for the two stepwise steps are 0.1286 and 2.6619 kilocalories per mole, while the concerted route costs 2.8564 kilocalories per mole. In cyclohexane, the corresponding values are 0.3589, 6.1076, and 3.5831 kilocalories per mole. The verdict is clear: ESDPT in H2BP-(OH)2DC-NH2 proceeds step by step, and every barrier shrinks as solvent polarity rises.</p>
<p>The implications reach beyond one molecule. Because the luminescence of ESIPT fluorophores depends intimately on whether and how fast protons transfer, the demonstration that solvent polarity systematically tunes the barriers offers a practical lever for controlling emission color and efficiency. The authors note that their conclusions provide a theoretical basis for regulating the luminescent properties of organic molecules simply by changing the polarity of the surrounding medium. For device engineers, that suggests the emissive behavior of H2BP-(OH)2DC-NH2 and related bipyridyl-diol derivatives could be engineered through matrix selection in OLED architectures, where the local dielectric environment plays the role of the solvent. For chemists studying biological proton transfer, the stepwise mechanism confirmed here offers a computationally tractable template for the multi-proton reactions that underpin so much of biochemistry.</p>
<p>The study also showcases how modern computational tools can dissect phenomena once accessible only through spectroscopy. By combining geometric parameters, infrared vibrational shifts, interaction region indicator visualizations, core-valence bifurcation indices, hydrogen bond energy predictions, frontier orbital analysis, and full potential energy surface scans, the researchers assembled a mutually consistent case in which every independent probe pointed to the same conclusion: excitation strengthens both hydrogen bonds, charge redistribution drives the protons toward their acceptors, and the double transfer unfolds one proton at a time, faster in more polar surroundings. Cross-checks with an alternative functional, Cam-B3LYP, reproduced the same reaction tendencies, bolstering confidence in the results. As ESIPT and ESDPT fluorophores continue to find roles in sensing, imaging, and display technologies, work of this kind turns an empirical art into a predictive science, showing exactly which molecular levers, hydrogen bond geometry, charge flow, and environmental polarity, determine whether a photon in becomes a shifted photon out.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Solvent-polarity effects on excited-state double proton transfer in the H2BP-(OH)2DC-NH2 fluorophore investigated by DFT and TDDFT calculations</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> A computational decode of photoinduced dual hydrogen bonding interactions and ESDPT behaviors for H2BP-(OH)2DC-NH2 fluorophore</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Chen, J., &amp; Zhao, J. (2026). A computational decode of photoinduced dual hydrogen bonding interactions and ESDPT behaviors for H2BP-(OH)2DC-NH2 fluorophore. <em>Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, 30</em>(2), Article 18. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44442-026-00067-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44442-026-00067-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44442-026-00067-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44442-026-00067-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> ESIPT, ESDPT, hydrogen bonding, solvent polarity, DFT, TDDFT, fluorophore, OLED, potential energy surface, charge redistribution, photochemistry, bipyridyl-diol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">235858</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
