<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>environmental aging &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/environmental-aging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:55:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>How Sunlight Quietly Shatters the World&#8217;s Microplastics</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/how-sunlight-quietly-shatters-the-worlds-microplastics/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbonyl index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of ultraviolet radiation on plastic polymers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental challenges of plastic waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of microplastic particles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formation of microplastics and nanoplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fragmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTIR spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global plastic pollution and microplastic distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastic pollution in marine and terrestrial ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photooxidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photooxidation of plastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic degradation rates and variability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic waste breakdown mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyethylene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polypropylene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polystyrene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary versus secondary microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of solar radiation in plastic fragmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sunlight-induced microplastic degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultraviolet degradation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review reveals how ultraviolet-driven photooxidation chemically weakens plastics and drives their fragmentation into micro- and nanoplastics across urban, agricultural, coastal, and offshore environments.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunlight is far more than a passive backdrop in the life of a piece of plastic litter. According to a comprehensive new review published in the journal Environmental Challenges, ultraviolet radiation drives a slow but relentless chemical transformation—photooxidation—that weakens plastic polymers from the outside in, ultimately breaking large debris into the microplastics and nanoplastics now found in every corner of the planet. The review, led by Wen Ji and colleagues including Michel C. Boufadel and Francois Galgani, synthesizes decades of laboratory and field research to explain why some plastics shatter quickly while others persist, and why the environment a particle travels through matters as much as the polymer itself.</p>
<p>The scale of the problem is staggering. Global plastic production now exceeds 400 million tons per year, and less than 10 percent is recycled. Microplastics—defined as particles smaller than 5 millimeters, or down to the nanometer scale under the European Chemicals Agency&#8217;s broader definition—are generated in two ways. Primary microplastics are manufactured small, such as exfoliating beads or fibers shed from synthetic textiles, while secondary microplastics arise when larger items like bottles, mulch films, and packaging degrade in place. Photooxidation initiated by solar ultraviolet radiation, followed by mechanical breakup, is the dominant pathway producing secondary particles, and understanding it is essential to predicting where plastic pollution will accumulate and how it will harm ecosystems.</p>
<p>At the molecular level, the chemistry follows a well-established three-stage sequence. Chain initiation begins when a polymer absorbs ultraviolet photons, either through intrinsic chromophores—aromatic rings in polystyrene, polycarbonate, and polyethylene terephthalate absorb light readily—or through impurities, additives, and structural defects in polymers like polyethylene and polypropylene that lack natural light absorbers. In propagation, the resulting polymer radicals react with oxygen to form peroxyl radicals, which strip hydrogen atoms from neighboring chains and generate hydroperoxide groups. Because the oxygen-oxygen bond in these groups is weak—its dissociation energy is roughly 176 kilojoules per mole, far lower than adjacent bonds—it cleaves easily under ultraviolet light, spawning alkoxy and hydroxyl radicals that sustain an autocatalytic cycle of oxidation. Termination eventually occurs when radicals combine into inert products, but not before crosslinking, branching, and the formation of carbonyl groups have reshaped the material.</p>
<p>The consequences for particle integrity are profound. Chain scission cuts polymer backbones, reducing molecular weight, while oxidation introduces carbonyl, hydroxyl, and carboxyl groups that embrittle the surface. Long-term experiments show the effects clearly: polypropylene photooxidized for 48 weeks increased in crystallinity and became progressively more prone to cracking, while simulated sunlight studies found cracks on polyethylene and polypropylene surfaces within 60 days and reported polystyrene fragmenting most aggressively of all, releasing micron-scale particles from surface fissures after a year of irradiation. One study of polystyrene in seawater recorded particles shrinking from an average of 12 micrometers to 2 micrometers, accompanied by a drop in surface contact angle from 130 to 60 degrees—evidence of both physical breakdown and a chemical shift toward a more hydrophilic, oxidized surface.</p>
<p>Water, counterintuitively, modifies this process in both directions. Photooxidation proceeds more slowly in rivers and oceans than in air because water attenuates ultraviolet radiation, cools the reaction, and limits oxygen availability. Yet lower surface oxidation does not mean less fragmentation. When polyethylene films weathered in air, oxidation stiffened and bent the surface layer, suppressing crack formation; in water, however, molecules infiltrated oxidation-induced voids and coalesced them into macrocracks that propagated perpendicular to the extrusion direction, yielding elongated fragments. Aquatic aging also releases dissolved transformation products: polystyrene irradiated for 150 days shed oxidized, low-molecular-weight compounds that altered colloidal stability and mobility, meaning water can retard chemical oxidation while accelerating physical failure and chemical leakage simultaneously.</p>
<p>The surrounding chemical milieu adds further complexity. Dissolved ions such as chloride, bromide, carbonate, and nitrate can generate reactive species—including hydroxyl radicals, carbonate radicals, and reactive chlorine species—that attack particle surfaces. Dissolved organic matter plays a double role: at low concentrations, fulvic acid adsorbs onto microplastics and produces triplet excited states and reactive oxygen species that accelerate aging, but at higher concentrations humic and fulvic acids act as light filters and radical scavengers, significantly inhibiting photooxidation of polypropylene in lake water. Additives embedded during manufacturing further modulate the outcome. Plasticizers can migrate out and leave polymers brittle; ultraviolet stabilizers and antioxidants delay degradation, with additive-containing polypropylene retaining tensile strength for roughly 88 days versus 22 days for additive-free material—though after 176 days both formulations fragmented into on the order of one hundred million particles per square centimeter. Protection, in other words, postpones fragmentation but does not prevent it.</p>
<p>Measuring all of this demands a battery of techniques, and the review is emphatic that no single method suffices. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy remains the workhorse, tracking carbonyl, hydroxyl, and vinyl groups through indices normalized to reference carbon-hydrogen bands. But carbonyl-index calculations vary wildly across studies—researchers use different carbonyl and reference wavenumbers—making cross-study comparison unreliable and prompting the authors to recommend a standardized area-based method for polyethylene and polypropylene. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy quantifies surface oxygen content; gel permeation chromatography documents chain scission; scanning electron microscopy visualizes cracks and debris; atomic force microscopy resolves nanoscale roughness and stiffness, and AFM-IR achieves chemical mapping at 50-to-100-nanometer resolution. Pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry enables mass-based polymer identification, though the review warns that oxidative aging and natural organic matter can distort its signals, producing false positives or biased quantification in weathered environmental samples.</p>
<p>Location shapes everything. Synthesizing carbonyl-index data from 48 field studies across four environmental compartments, the review finds that urban microplastics—transported quickly through runoff and wastewater systems, often shaded—show modest oxidative aging, with median carbonyl indices around 0.17 to 0.19 for polyethylene and polypropylene. Agricultural soils present intermediate signals, where sunlight strikes exposed mulch films but burial by tillage shifts aging toward non-photochemical processes. Beaches and estuaries tell a stronger story: repeated wetting-drying cycles, prolonged sunlight, and sediment abrasion produce median carbonyl indices as high as 0.82 for polyethylene, roughly four times the urban median. Offshore surface waters yield the highest values for polypropylene, with a median of 0.79 and maxima exceeding 2, consistent with cumulative solar exposure during long oceanic transport—though the review cautions that net sampling preferentially collects larger floating particles, so these size patterns cannot be read as direct measures of fragmentation intensity.</p>
<p>The deeper message is that fragmentation is a coupled chemical-mechanical phenomenon, not a simple function of oxidation. In semi-crystalline polymers, degradation attacks amorphous regions between crystalline lamellae first; when enough tie molecules connecting crystalline domains are severed, lamellae separate as micro- and nanoplastic fragments. Crystalline morphology even dictates fragment shape—polystyrene&#8217;s spherulitic structure yields small, non-elongated pieces, while polyethylene cracks along predictable directions to form elongated shards. The authors argue that future research must standardize aging metrics, harmonize sampling and detection limits, distinguish accelerated laboratory exposures from environmentally realistic conditions, and integrate photooxidation, fragmentation, and ecotoxicological assessment. As aged microplastics display altered contaminant adsorption and biological responses compared with pristine particles, understanding how sunlight writes its chemical signature into plastic surfaces is becoming central to evaluating the true risk of the pollution already circling the globe.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The mechanisms by which ultraviolet-induced photooxidation degrades and fragments microplastics across environmental compartments</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Impact of Photooxidation on the Fragmentation of Microplastics: A Review</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ji, W., Dhulia, A., Boufadel, M. C., Redman, A. D., Davis, C. W., Chen, H., &amp; Galgani, F. (2026). Impact of Photooxidation on the Fragmentation of Microplastics: A Review. <em>Environmental Challenges</em>, Article 101650. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2026.101650" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2026.101650</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2026.101650" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.envc.2026.101650</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> microplastics, photooxidation, ultraviolet degradation, carbonyl index, polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, fragmentation, nanoplastics, plastic pollution, FTIR spectroscopy, environmental aging</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196659</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
