Cultural competence in healthcare is defined as the ability of providers to understand and respect diverse cultural backgrounds effectively. This capability fosters better communication, enhances patient-provider relationships, and ultimately leads to improved health outcomes. Given the plurality of cultures present in modern societies, it is essential that healthcare professionals are equipped with the necessary skills and knowledge to navigate this complexity. The EMCC-14 scale serves as a crucial tool for evaluating these competencies among future healthcare providers.

The study conducted by Agrazal-García and colleagues highlights the importance of validating measurement scales within specific cultural contexts. The researchers focused on the EMCC-14, which was developed to assess the cultural competence of healthcare students. By ensuring that these tools are not only reliable but also culturally relevant, the authors emphasize the need for tailored assessments that reflect the demographics of the population being studied.

Through a robust methodological approach, the study provided evidence for the scale’s validity and factorial invariance. These psychometric properties suggest that the EMCC-14 can reliably capture the nuances of cultural competence across various student demographics in Panama. Validity is particularly crucial; without it, the findings drawn from such assessments could misrepresent the cultural readiness of students in healthcare fields.

Statistical analysis formed the backbone of the researchers’ approach, employing techniques such as confirmatory factor analysis to ascertain the structural integrity of the EMCC-14. This rigorous examination not only reassures stakeholders about the soundness of the scale but also establishes a foundation for future research. A well-validated measurement tool can yield significant insights into the cultural competence of healthcare students, highlighting areas that require further development.

Additionally, the notion of factorial invariance is critical when considering the differences that may exist among various groups of students. It indicates that the EMCC-14 performs consistently across different cultural backgrounds, thereby fostering inclusivity in educational assessments. This aspect of the research is vital in addressing disparities in healthcare delivery that may arise from cultural misunderstandings or lack of awareness.

The study drew upon a diverse sample of healthcare students within Panama, further underscoring the importance of context in cultural competence assessments. By grounding their research in the local environment, the authors illustrate how cultural nuances impact healthcare practices. The local demographic context is essential, as it allows for the identification of specific cultural factors that may influence patient interactions.

Implications for educators are manifold, as the findings suggest a need for integrating cultural competence training into healthcare curricula actively. As the healthcare workforce continues to evolve, equipping students with both knowledge and practical skills in navigating cultural diversity becomes essential. Educational institutions have a responsibility not only to teach clinical competencies but also to foster a mindset of cultural awareness and sensitivity among their students.

Furthermore, the integration of culturally competent practices within healthcare organizations can lead to improved health equity. By enabling students to understand the unique challenges faced by diverse patient populations, educational programs can effectively prepare future healthcare practitioners for the realities of their professions. This cultural preparation is not merely an academic exercise; it has far-reaching consequences for community health, access to care, and overall patient satisfaction.

Peer-reviewed studies, such as the one conducted by Agrazal-García et al., play a crucial role in driving policy changes within healthcare education. The validation of the EMCC-14 as a reliable measurement tool may influence how educational institutions assess cultural competence among their students. As stakeholders recognize the importance of this research, it is likely to gain traction within curricular guidelines and accreditation standards.

In addition, the focus on cultural competence reflects a broader shift within healthcare towards patient-centered care. As health systems strive to enhance the patient experience, the significance of understanding cultural differences has never been more pronounced. This study paves the way for more comprehensive training programs that address both medical knowledge and cultural humility.

As we reflect on the findings of this study, it’s essential to consider the future trajectory of cultural competence in healthcare education. As new generations of healthcare professionals enter the field, the benchmarks set forth by research like that conducted by Agrazal-García et al. will serve as foundational elements for training and evaluation. Ongoing research will be necessary to keep the EMCC-14 and similar tools relevant as cultural dynamics continue to evolve across the globe.

Ultimately, the importance of cultural competence within healthcare cannot be overstated. The insights derived from this research underscore the critical need for continued investment in training that emphasizes understanding, respect, and effective communication across cultural boundaries. By prioritizing these competencies in education, we pave the way for better healthcare outcomes and a more equitable healthcare system.

In conclusion, the study conducted by Agrazal-García, Tuñón, and Pedrero represents a pivotal moment in the pursuit of cultural competence in healthcare education. Through their meticulous validation of the EMCC-14, they offer a new lens through which educators and policymakers can examine the cultural readiness of future healthcare professionals. The transformative potential of such research lies not only in its academic contributions but also in its capacity to enhance the quality of care provided to diverse populations. By embracing cultural competence as a cornerstone of healthcare education, we can strive towards a more inclusive and effective healthcare system.

Subject of Research: Cultural competence measurement in healthcare education

Article Title: Evidence of validity and factorial invariance of the cultural competence measurement scale (EMCC-14) among students of healthcare sciences in Panama.

Article References:

Agrazal-García, J., Tuñón, R. & Pedrero, V. Evidence of validity and factorial invariance of the cultural competence measurement scale (EMCC-14) among students of healthcare sciences in Panama.
BMC Med Educ 25, 1655 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08190-8

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08190-8

Keywords: cultural competence, healthcare education, EMCC-14, assessment, validation, psychometrics, healthcare outcomes, patient-centered care.

Advance care planning is an essential component of healthcare, particularly in residential care settings where older adults often face chronic illnesses or declining health. Traditionally, families have struggled with navigating these conversations, leading to uncertainty and often under-informed decisions. The findings of this study reveal that motivational interviewing—a client-centered, directive method for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change—can serve as a breakthrough approach to bridge this communication gap.

The study involved a cohort of family members of residents in various care homes, who were offered sessions based on motivational interviewing strategies. These sessions were designed not only to educate but to create an environment of trust and openness. The fundamental aim was to empower families to engage deeply in conversations about advance care directives, preferences for medical interventions, and overall end-of-life care choices. By equipping family members with the tools necessary to articulate their wishes and anxieties, the researchers created a pathway for more meaningful discussions about care preferences.

One of the significant challenges identified in the study was the often emotional and complex nature of such discussions. Family members typically enter these conversations carrying a heavy emotional load, which can hinder open dialogue. The research revealed that motivational interviewing techniques helped to alleviate some of this emotional burden, enabling participants to express concerns more freely and develop a clearer understanding of their loved ones’ wishes. The empathetic approach allowed for a structured yet flexible conversation, fostering an environment conducive to reflection and sharing.

Moreover, the comparative analysis conducted by the researchers indicated a notable increase in the clarity of advance care plans formulated by families who participated in the motivational interviewing sessions. Many family members reported feeling more informed and confident about their decisions, which aligns with the broader goals of ACP—ensuring that a person’s values and preferences are honored, especially when they are no longer able to communicate these themselves. The implications of these findings are profound, suggesting that integrating motivational interviewing into routine care may significantly enhance the quality of end-of-life care.

While interpreting the results, it is crucial to recognize the qualitative nature of the data collected. Many families expressed a newfound sense of agency, indicating that the motivational interviewing sessions fostered a collaborative approach to care planning that had previously been absent. This shift not only benefits the families but ultimately leads to improved satisfaction among healthcare providers, who are tasked with delivering care that aligns closely with the resident’s wishes.

This study’s outcomes also hint at broader implications for policy and practice within residential care settings. Emphasizing the need for staff training in motivational interviewing could lead to a paradigm shift in the culture of care. By prioritizing communication and family engagement, care facilities could promote a more holistic understanding of patient needs, enhancing not only the quality of care but also the relationship between families and healthcare providers.

As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, the insights gleaned from this research present an exciting frontier in addressing the complexities of advance care planning. The study highlights the importance of empowering family members through education and guidance, transforming them from passive recipients of care information into active partners in the healthcare process. This approach aligns seamlessly with person-centered care models, which emphasize the importance of individualized care plans that reflect the true preferences of patients.

Yet, the implementation of motivational interviewing is not without its challenges. Training staff adequately to utilize these techniques proficiently requires a commitment from healthcare organizations to invest in workforce development. Moreover, ongoing support and resources are essential to ensure sustainability in applying these practices across various settings. Nevertheless, the potential benefits, as indicated by the study, underscore the necessity of adopting such strategies on a wider scale.

In conclusion, the research conducted by Wang and colleagues encapsulates the transformative power of motivational interviewing in advance care planning, especially within residential care homes. As the study suggests, fostering meaningful conversations about end-of-life care can have far-reaching effects on families, care providers, and ultimately, the residents themselves. The commitment to empowering families through effective communication strategies could serve as a model for future initiatives, paving the way toward more compassionate and informed healthcare practices.

The integration of motivational interviewing into ACP not only honors the individual preferences of residents but also embraces the emotional dynamics of family relationships. This paradigm shift could lead to profound improvements in the landscape of residential care, ensuring that every voice is heard, every preference is respected, and every life is honored at the end of its journey.

As the healthcare community reflects on these findings, one thing is clear: the dialogue surrounding end-of-life care must evolve. By prioritizing motivational approaches to family engagement, we can foster a culture of understanding and support that benefits all involved, ensuring that advance care planning is not just a procedural requirement but a deeply compassionate process that genuinely respects the desires and wishes of those we care for.

With the implications of these findings resonating across the field, the future of advance care planning looks brighter, characterized by thoughtful conversations anchored in empathy and respect. The commitment to such an approach may well redefine how we honor life’s final chapter—a fitting tribute to the individuals whose stories deserve to be told, cherished, and respected even in their twilight years.

Subject of Research: The role of motivational interviewing in engaging family members in advance care planning.

Article Title: Motivational interviewing on engaging family members on advance care planning in residential care homes: a quasi-experimental study.

Article References:

Wang, T., Ho, MH., Tse, N. et al. Motivational interviewing on engaging family members on advance care planning in residential care homes: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Nurs 24, 1190 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03853-9

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-03853-9

Keywords: Motivational interviewing, advance care planning, family engagement, residential care homes, healthcare communication.

Electronic discharge summaries serve as crucial documents that encapsulate critical information about a patient’s journey through the healthcare system, particularly after a hospital discharge. These summaries not only inform subsequent healthcare providers about the patient’s treatment and prognosis; they also empower patients with essential information regarding their care. The design of these documents needs to be both functional and user-friendly to ensure that they serve their intended purpose efficiently. This study explores the design elements that can maximize the utility of discharge summaries specifically for ophthalmology patients.

The importance of a well-structured electronic discharge summary cannot be overstated, particularly in managing eye health, where detailed information regarding diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care is essential. The research by Zafarnezhad and colleagues delves into the specific components that should be included in an ophthalmology-focused electronic discharge summary, highlighting the distinct requirements of this specialty. The research team thoroughly analyzed existing templates and practices, identifying gaps and areas for improvement in current discharge summaries.

In their study, the authors implemented a multifaceted approach, taking into account various factors including user interface design, accessibility, and the integration of relevant clinical data. One of the pivotal findings of the research indicates that incorporating visual aids and simplified language into the discharge summaries can significantly enhance patient comprehension. Given the complexity of ocular conditions, patients often struggle with understanding medical terminology; thus, the use of straightforward language alongside diagrams could foster better patient engagement and adherence to follow-up care recommendations.

Moreover, the study highlights the need for standardization in electronic discharge summaries across ophthalmology practices. Inconsistent formats can create confusion among patients and healthcare providers alike, potentially leading to misunderstandings and lapses in follow-up care. By establishing a standardized template, the healthcare community can ensure that vital information is consistently communicated, reducing the likelihood of errors and improving overall patient outcomes.

The integration of telemedicine into the discharge process is another exciting development highlighted by the research. With the rise of telehealth solutions, there is immense potential for electronic discharge summaries to serve as a bridge between in-person and remote care. The authors advocate for including links to virtual follow-up appointments within these summaries, thereby facilitating seamless transitions to subsequent care and ensuring that patients receive timely follow-up evaluations, an aspect crucial in the management of eye conditions.

Furthermore, the research underscores the importance of collaborative input from healthcare stakeholders, including ophthalmologists, nurses, and patients themselves, when designing electronic discharge summaries. Their perspectives and feedback can be invaluable in shaping a document that truly meets the diverse needs of all parties involved in the care continuum. Engaging stakeholders early in the design process allows for the gathering of practical insights, which can enhance both the relevance and usability of the final product.

One key component that emerged from the study is the necessity for training healthcare staff on how to effectively utilize electronic discharge summaries. It is imperative that medical professionals are proficient in both the technology and the importance of clear communication in these documents. Feasible strategies for training programs could include workshops and simulated scenarios that equip healthcare providers with skills to create meaningful discharge summaries that serve both clinical requirements and patient comprehension.

As the healthcare landscape continues to evolve, the potential for electronic discharge summaries to enhance patient care in ophthalmology cannot be overlooked. By fostering a more efficient, integrated approach to documentation and communication, healthcare systems can improve the continuity of care. The study by Zafarnezhad et al. sets a significant precedent for future research and innovation in the optimization of discharge processes.

Looking ahead, further research is essential to assess the long-term impact of enhanced electronic discharge summaries on patient outcomes in ophthalmology. Investigating metrics such as readmission rates, patient satisfaction, and adherence to follow-up care will provide crucial insights into the effectiveness of these innovations. The study serves as a foundation for ongoing exploration of how technology can enhance practical aspects of healthcare delivery, particularly in specialized domains.

Technological adoption in healthcare often presents challenges, yet studies like this one illustrate that the design and implementation of electronic discharge summaries represent a promising avenue for improvement. More rigorous clinical research could further elucidate the myriad potential benefits these summaries may bring to patient care management. The study’s implications extend beyond ophthalmology, suggesting that similar frameworks could enhance the discharge processes in a variety of medical specialties.

As we pave the way towards a more digitally empowered healthcare system, the design and execution of electronic discharge summaries will undoubtedly play a crucial role in shaping the future of patient care. It is a realization of how technology can bridge the gaps in healthcare delivery, creating a more patient-centric approach that respects and responds to individual needs. The movement towards optimizing electronic health records and discharge summaries is not just a trend; it’s a necessary evolution towards better health outcomes in the modern era.

In conclusion, Zafarnezhad et al.’s research contributes significantly to the understanding and development of electronic discharge summaries in ophthalmology. It presents concrete recommendations for enhancing the design and functionality of these vital documents, with the overarching goal of improving communication and care coordination for ophthalmology patients. As the healthcare community grapples with increasing demands for efficiency and quality, the insights from this study encourage a forward-thinking approach that embraces innovation in patient care.

Through the lens of this research, stakeholders are reminded of the ongoing journey to optimize healthcare delivery through electronic systems. As we continue to innovate and refine these tools, the ultimate beneficiaries will be the patients, whose experiences can be enriched through thoughtful design and robust implementation of electronic discharge summaries.

Subject of Research: Electronic health record management for ophthalmology patients

Article Title: Electronic discharge summary design: a step towards electronic health record ophthalmology patients.

Article References:

Zafarnezhad, B., Sadeghi, J., Abasi, S. et al. Electronic discharge summary design: a step towards electronic health record ophthalmology patients.
BMC Health Serv Res 25, 1250 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13462-6

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-13462-6

Keywords: electronic health records, discharge summary, ophthalmology, patient care, healthcare innovation

Neonatology, a specialized field dedicated to the care of newborn infants especially those born premature or with critical illnesses, often demands intricate and coordinated medical interventions. The authors articulate how fragmented care models, characterized by siloed expertise and limited communication between specialties such as neonatology, nursing, respiratory therapy, nutrition, and social services, may impede holistic patient care. They advocate for integrative strategies that recognize the unique contributions of each professional while fostering seamless interactions.

Underlying the commission’s perspective is a dynamic vision: creating integrated care systems where pediatricians, nurses, therapists, developmental specialists, and families collaborate in real-time, guided by shared goals and data-driven decision-making. This paradigm shift is fueled by evidence suggesting that multidisciplinary teams enhance diagnostic accuracy, reduce errors, and improve neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates. The authors emphasize that such collaboration is not merely additive but synergistic—unlocking new potential beyond individual expertise.

Technological advances are highlighted as pivotal enablers of this collaborative future. The utilization of electronic health records customized for neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), telemedicine platforms connecting scattered specialists, and advanced analytics capable of predicting patient trajectories are presented as essential tools. These innovations are positioned as means to transcend geographical and professional boundaries, allowing expert consultation and coordinated care irrespective of location.

However, the article also tackles substantial challenges impeding interprofessional collaboration. Cultural differences among disciplines, variability in training and communication skills, and systemic barriers such as reimbursement structures and administrative inertia are dissected. The authors call for targeted educational reforms, advocating for interprofessional training modules embedded in graduate and postgraduate curricula to instill collaborative competencies early in professional development.

A notable emphasis is placed on family-centered care reshaped by this collaborative ethos. Recognizing families as integral members of the care team, the authors argue for enhanced communication pathways and participatory decision-making processes. By empowering parents and caregivers, providers may improve adherence, satisfaction, and long-term developmental support, creating a continuum of care that extends beyond hospital discharge.

Furthermore, the commission underscores the necessity of equitable access to neonatology expertise worldwide. Disparities in resources and specialist availability disproportionately impact low- and middle-income countries, stressing the urgency of scalable, collaborative models and capacity-building initiatives. The authors envision leveraging global networks and digital platforms to disseminate best practices and democratize access to lifesaving neonatal care innovations.

Another critical component of the proposed framework is research collaboration across disciplines. The authors propose integrated research consortia that bring together clinicians, basic scientists, epidemiologists, and data scientists to address pressing questions in neonatal pathophysiology, treatment optimization, and long-term outcomes. Such alliances could catalyze breakthroughs in understanding conditions like bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, and brain injury.

The article also delves into ethical dimensions intertwined with neonatology’s collaborative future. Decision-making in neonatal intensive care often involves prognostic uncertainty, complex risk-benefit assessments, and delicate considerations of quality of life. Effective interdisciplinary dialogue and inclusion of ethics experts are posited as mechanisms to navigate these challenges compassionately and transparently.

To operationalize this vision, the authors suggest policy reforms incentivizing collaborative care models, such as bundled payments and quality metrics aligned with team-based outcomes. Institutional leadership is called upon to foster cultures that value and reward interprofessional collaboration, ensuring infrastructure and support systems sustain sustainable improvements.

Importantly, the article presents a roadmap for implementing these changes incrementally, recognizing that transformative shifts require patience, adaptability, and continuous learning. Pilot projects, feedback mechanisms, and ongoing evaluation are proposed as essential elements to refine collaborative models and tailor them to diverse clinical settings.

The psychological and professional well-being of healthcare providers also receives attention. The burdens of caregiving in NICUs are immense, and the authors highlight that support systems emerging from collaborative communities can mitigate burnout and compassion fatigue, ultimately enhancing provider retention and performance.

From a systems engineering perspective, the commission endorses principles of human factors and design thinking to redesign workflows and communication channels within NICUs. Structured huddles, standardized protocols co-created by multidisciplinary teams, and real-time data dashboards are proffered as practical interventions to streamline team interactions and patient management.

The article concludes with a clarion call for the global neonatology community to embrace this cultural evolution. The future of neonatal care, as envisioned by Abman and colleagues, is one where synergy supersedes isolation, innovation rides the crest of collaboration, and the collective strength of diverse professionals incubates better beginnings for the smallest and most fragile lives.

This heralded commission paper not only delineates a strategic pathway but ignites a movement—one that challenges entrenched paradigms and inspires a reimagining of neonatology’s potential, driven by interprofessional unity and shared mission. As neonatal care enters this new chapter, the prospects for improved survival, development, and quality of life for newborns are profoundly promising, capturing the attention of clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and families alike.

Subject of Research: Neonatology, interprofessional collaboration, neonatal intensive care.

Article Title: The Lancet Commission on the Future of Neonatology: A Call to Enhance Interprofessional Collaborations.

Article References:
Abman, S.H., Modi, N. & De Luca, D. The lancet commission on the future of neonatology: a call to enhance interprofessional collaborations. Pediatr Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04486-z

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-04486-z

In the context of healthcare, nursing remains a pivotal discipline that requires a blend of empathy, skill, and timely intervention. However, as patient numbers increase and healthcare demands rise, the need for innovative solutions has never been greater. The study by Nematollahi Maleki et al. highlights how AI can assist nursing professionals by providing streamlined communication, enhanced data analytics, and predictive analytics. This technological advancement can empower nurses to make informed decisions promptly and effectively, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.

One of the most critical aspects of integrating AI into nursing care is understanding the concept of AI assists. This entails recognizing that AI systems are not intended to replace human staff but to augment their capabilities. The authors posit that AI can efficiently handle redundant tasks—such as data entry and patient monitoring—thereby freeing nursing professionals to focus more on direct patient interaction and complex clinical problem-solving. Employing the Walker and Avant concept analysis framework, the study clarifies the different components defining AI-assisted nursing care, allowing for a deeper understanding of its significance in modern healthcare environments.

As the research underscores, the application of AI in nursing care is multifaceted. One critical element that the authors explore is the ethical implications of AI-assisted systems. As with any emerging technology, questions arise about data privacy, informed consent, and the potential biases embedded within AI algorithms. The study emphasizes the importance of establishing transparent guidelines and ethical standards to ensure that nursing professionals can leverage AI while upholding their ethical obligations to patients. The potential for data-driven improvements hinges on building trust in AI systems, which necessitates ongoing dialogue among stakeholders.

AI’s role in predictive analytics is another area that the study emphasizes. By utilizing vast datasets from electronic health records, AI algorithms can anticipate patient needs and even identify potential health crises before they escalate. This capability presents an unprecedented opportunity for nursing professionals to proactively address issues, enhancing patient safety and care quality. The authors highlight various case studies where implementation of AI-driven solutions has successfully reduced hospital readmissions and improved patient engagement.

Moreover, the research delves into the diverse applications of AI in nursing practice. From virtual health assistants that monitor patients post-discharge to AI-driven decision-support systems that aid in diagnosing and formulating treatment plans, the potential appears limitless. Nursing professionals equipped with AI tools can offer personalized care that is not just reactive but rather anticipatory of patients’ unique needs. This paradigm shift necessitates training and education for nurses, enabling them to harness technology effectively in everyday practice.

However, the transition to AI-enriched nursing practices is not without challenges. Resistance to change, technological illiteracy among nursing staff, and concerns surrounding job security are among the barriers to adopting AI in nursing care. The study offers insights into overcoming these obstacles, suggesting robust professional development programs and collaborative environments that encourage the integration of AI while providing ongoing support to nursing staff in their adjustment period.

The concept of interdisciplinary collaboration is paramount in the successful implementation of AI in nursing. The research emphasizes that the intersection of nursing, technology, and healthcare requires a concerted effort from multiple stakeholders—including policymakers, healthcare organizations, and educational institutions. A synchronized approach can foster a culture of innovation where AI can flourish alongside traditional nursing practices, ensuring that patients receive the best possible care.

As we anticipate the future of AI in nursing, it is crucial to consider the role of ongoing research in evaluating the impact of these technologies on patient outcomes and nursing practices. The investigation led by Nematollahi Maleki et al. sets the stage for further explorations into the effectiveness of AI-assisted interventions. It challenges the nursing community to remain receptive, proactive, and engaged in discussions about the potential benefits and challenges that AI presents.

Furthermore, the growing implementation of AI technologies raises the stakes in terms of workforce training, necessitating updated curricula in nursing education programs. By equipping future nursing professionals with knowledge of AI systems and their applications, educational institutions can lay the groundwork for a more technologically adept workforce, ensuring that nurses are prepared to navigate the complex landscape of modern healthcare.

The authors close the study with a call to action for further research in this domain. They stress the need for comprehensive studies that investigate the long-term effects of AI-assisted care on patient outcomes, workforce dynamics, and operational efficiency within healthcare settings. Results from such research could catalyze widespread adoption of AI in nursing, with the ultimate goal of enriching patient care and optimizing the healthcare delivery system.

In conclusion, the integration of AI into nursing care represents a transformative opportunity that could redefine how care is administered. The thoughtful examination provided by Nematollahi Maleki et al. through the Walker and Avant approach sheds light on the intricacies of this concept, offering valuable insights into the implications, potential, and challenges posed by AI technologies. As we move forward in a world increasingly shaped by digital innovation, embracing AI in nursing will be crucial for improving patient outcomes, alleviating workforce burdens, and setting a new standard for the future of healthcare.

Subject of Research: Integration of artificial intelligence in nursing care and its implications.

Article Title: Artificial intelligence-assisted nursing care: a concept analysis using Walker and Avant approach.

Article References:

Nematollahi Maleki, R., Shahbazi, S., Hoseinzadeh, M. et al. Artificial intelligence-assisted nursing care: a concept analysis using Walker and Avant approach. BMC Nurs 24, 1175 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03818-y

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-03818-y

Keywords: Nursing care, Artificial intelligence, Predictive analytics, Concept analysis, Walker and Avant approach, Healthcare innovation.