<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>enhanced coalbed methane recovery &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/enhanced-coalbed-methane-recovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:17:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Coal Experiment Reveals Carbon Dioxide Diffusion Can Rise and Then Fall With Pressure</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/coal-experiment-reveals-carbon-dioxide-diffusion-can-rise-and-then-fall-with-pressure/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthracite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apparent diffusion coefficient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apparent diffusion coefficient in coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal gas diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalbed methane storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coalification spectrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhanced coalbed methane recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fick diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas flow dynamics in coal seams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas transport in coal matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geological carbon sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of pressure on coal gas permeability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knudsen diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle method]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pore structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pressure effects on gas diffusion in coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pressure-dependent gas diffusion experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sorption experiments on coal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=206271</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A systematic study of four Chinese coals shows that the apparent carbon dioxide diffusion coefficient in high-rank anthracite can first increase and then decrease with rising pressure, resolving a decades-old debate through a proposed mechanism of pore-structure-regulated temporary enhancement of Knudsen diffusion.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For nearly three decades, researchers studying how gases move through coal have been locked in a stubborn disagreement. Some laboratory studies reported that the apparent diffusion coefficient of gas in the coal matrix increases as pressure climbs; others found the opposite, that it decreases. Because this single number, the apparent diffusion coefficient, underpins predictions of how quickly methane can be drained from coal seams and how efficiently injected carbon dioxide can be stored underground, the contradiction has practical consequences for two of the most consequential energy technologies of the coming decades: enhanced coalbed methane recovery and geological carbon sequestration. A new experimental study published in the Journal of Saudi Chemical Society now offers the most systematic attempt yet to resolve the dispute, and its findings are stranger and more interesting than either camp predicted.</p>
<p>The research team, led by He Shao and Jun Zhang of Taiyuan University of Technology together with Junhong Si of the North China Institute of Science and Technology, carried out an unusually comprehensive set of sorption experiments on four Chinese coals drawn from three coalbed methane-rich basins: the Qinshui Basin, the Eastern Ordos Basin and the Eastern Yunnan Basin. The samples spanned the full coalification spectrum. Two were high-rank anthracites, QS and YQ, with vitrinite reflectance values as high as 2.35 percent; one was a medium-rank bituminous coal, XCG; and one was a low-rank lignite, XLT. By grinding, sieving, cutting and polishing the coals, the researchers prepared both granular particles, ranging from less than 0.097 millimeters to 0.841 to 3.35 millimeters, and cylindrical cores of 13.5 by 13.5 millimeters, allowing them to test how geometry and particle size shape gas transport.</p>
<p>The core of the methodology is the particle method, a workhorse technique in coal science. Coal samples are placed in a sample cell connected to a reference cell inside a thermostatic water bath held to within 0.1 degrees Celsius. A dose of gas, carbon dioxide, methane or nitrogen, is released into the cell, and high-precision pressure transducers record the pressure decay every two seconds as molecules adsorb onto internal pore surfaces. The resulting sorption kinetic curves are then fitted with mathematical models to extract the apparent diffusion coefficient. In this study the team used two models: a modified unipore model, mUM, which assumes a single pore radius and whose boundary conditions match the manometric experiment, and the widely used bidisperse model, BM, which assumes a bimodal pore distribution with separate macro- and micropore diffusion coefficients. Notably, the mUM performed better for the anthracites, while the BM model fit the bituminous coal and lignite more successfully, confirming earlier suspicions that model choice matters, even if it does not overturn the qualitative trends.</p>
<p>What sets the new work apart is its breadth of controls. Beyond pressure, the researchers systematically varied nine potential influencing factors: calculation model, coal rank, sample geometry, particle size, sample mass, gas type, pressure application method, pressure step increment and experimental temperature, tested at 40 and 50 degrees Celsius. Pressure was applied in two distinct ways: incremental steps, in which the cell is evacuated only before the first step, and integral steps, in which the sample is vacuumed before every step. The magnitude of each pressure increment was also varied, with four-step large increments compared against six-step small increments. All samples were pretreated with supercritical carbon dioxide and vacuum dried at 110 degrees Celsius for 48 hours to remove moisture and residual gases, and helium leakage tests over 22,000 seconds confirmed the apparatus was gas-tight.</p>
<p>The results reproduced both of the previously reported behaviors, and then added a third that had rarely been seen. The medium-rank bituminous coal XCG and the low-rank lignite XLT showed apparent diffusion coefficients that decreased with rising pressure, consistent with one camp of earlier studies. The high-rank anthracites QS and YQ generally showed increasing coefficients with pressure, consistent with the other camp. But for the YQ anthracite with large particle sizes, granular YQ6 and the cylindrical core YQ4, tested under incremental pressure steps with small increments, the carbon dioxide diffusion coefficient did something unexpected: it first increased and then decreased. For YQ6, the value rose from 7.58 times ten to the minus eleventh square meters per second to 2.42 times ten to the minus tenth before falling back to 2.30 times ten to the minus tenth. For YQ4, the rise was even more dramatic, from 2.11 times ten to the minus ninth to 5.66 times ten to the minus ninth, followed by a steep drop to 3.63 times ten to the minus tenth. This non-monotonic pattern, rising then falling with stepwise pressure increases, had been essentially absent from the literature.</p>
<p>To explain it, the team borrowed a conceptual tool from chemical reaction kinetics: the distinction between overall reactions and their elementary steps. The particle method, they argue, is analogous to an overall reaction, yielding an apparent coefficient that lumps together every stage of gas migration. By deconstructing the measurement into its component sub-steps, external diffusion across the stagnant gas boundary layer, Fick diffusion in larger pores, Knudsen diffusion in smaller pores where molecules collide with walls more often than with each other, and configurational diffusion in pores barely wider than the molecules themselves, they could track how each mechanism evolves with pressure. Quantitatively, they calculated the Fick diffusion coefficient, which is inversely proportional to pressure, and the Knudsen diffusion coefficient, which depends on pore size and molecular velocity but is only indirectly tied to pressure through the mean free path of the gas molecules.</p>
<p>The key insight emerges from how pressure reshapes the boundary between these two diffusion regimes. As pressure rises, the mean molecular free path shrinks, which lowers the pore size threshold below which Knudsen diffusion dominates and reduces the number of pores available to it. But within a single pressure step, as gas adsorbs and pressure decays, the free path lengthens again, the upper pore size limit for Knudsen diffusion expands, and more pores switch into the Knudsen regime. Knudsen diffusion can therefore be temporarily enhanced during the later stage of a low-pressure step, an effect that fades away at higher pressures. Combining this quantitative tracking with pore structure data from five complementary techniques, mercury porosimetry, low-temperature nitrogen and carbon dioxide adsorption, scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy, the team showed that the anthracites are rich in micropores while the lower-rank coals contain more cleats, macropores and mesopores.</p>
<p>From this synthesis they proposed a qualitative conjecture they call pore-structure-regulated temporary enhancement of Knudsen diffusion. In micropore-rich anthracite, pressure-driven changes in the molecular mean free path temporarily boost the Knudsen diffusion coefficient and open up additional micropores and partial mesopores, between roughly 0.6 and 5.5 nanometers under these experimental conditions, as effective Knudsen pathways, lifting the apparent coefficient. As pressure continues to climb across multiple steps, the enhancement collapses and the coefficient falls. The conjecture also accounts for why the effect appears only under specific conditions: large particles preserve the long diffusion paths that let Knudsen contributions dominate, incremental pressure steps preserve pre-saturation patterns that favor the effect, and carbon dioxide&#8217;s small kinetic diameter of 0.330 nanometers, smaller than nitrogen at 0.364 or methane at 0.380 nanometers, grants it access to narrow micropores that the other gases cannot enter.</p>
<p>The study also delivered a methodological caution with wide relevance. The team found that the apparent diffusion coefficient alone can be misleading when comparing samples of different geometry or particle size. In one striking inversion, the YQ6 particles sorbed carbon dioxide faster than the YQ4 cylinders yet yielded a smaller diffusion coefficient, 7.58 times ten to the minus eleventh versus 2.03 times ten to the minus ninth square meters per second at the first pressure step. Normalizing by the square of the diffusion path length, giving the effective apparent diffusion coefficient D over r squared, restored consistency with the observed sorption rates. The researchers also found that gas type, temperature and sample mass had minimal impact on the overall pressure trends, while the choice of pressure application method did shift the trends for the anthracites, reinforcing that experimental protocol choices, long treated as细节, can determine which of the warring literature results a lab reproduces.</p>
<p>The implications reach beyond the laboratory. In carbon dioxide-enhanced coalbed methane operations, injected gas travels through the cleat system, diffuses into the matrix and displaces methane, which then flows to production wells; the diffusion coefficient governs how quickly that exchange proceeds, particularly during early injection stages and late-stage methane drainage when pressures are low, precisely the regime where the newly identified enhancement appears. For geological carbon sequestration, understanding how storage efficiency may vary with pressure helps assess long-term containment. The authors caution that their conjecture remains qualitative, that stress and coal swelling effects were not considered, and that only two models were tested, leaving room for further verification. But by simultaneously reproducing the increasing, decreasing and now non-monotonic pressure behaviors within a single controlled framework, and by supplying a physical mechanism that reconciles them, the study transforms a thirty-year-old contradiction into a coherent, testable picture of how gases truly navigate the labyrinth of coal.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Pressure dependence of the apparent gas diffusion coefficient in the coal matrix under multiple experimental factors</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Experimental investigation on the pressure dependence of apparent gas diffusion coefficient in coal matrix under multiple potential factors</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Experimental investigation on the pressure dependence of apparent gas diffusion coefficient in coal matrix under multiple potential factors. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44442-026-00121-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44442-026-00121-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44442-026-00121-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44442-026-00121-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> coal matrix, apparent diffusion coefficient, gas pressure, Knudsen diffusion, Fick diffusion, carbon dioxide, coalbed methane, CO2 sequestration, coal rank, pore structure, particle method, anthracite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">206271</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thermal vs. Chemical Permeability in CO2-H2O-Coal Interaction</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/thermal-vs-chemical-permeability-in-co2-h2o-coal-interaction/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 17:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon sequestration efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical permeability in coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CO2 H2O coal interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal matrix and pore networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal permeability enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhanced coalbed methane recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geochemistry and energy engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multidisciplinary research on coal permeability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reactive processes in coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature effects on coal structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal permeability in coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unconventional resource extraction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/thermal-vs-chemical-permeability-in-co2-h2o-coal-interaction/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a groundbreaking study that merges the intricacies of geochemistry and energy engineering, researchers have unveiled new insights into the complex interplay between thermal and chemical effects on coal permeability. This revelation emerges from an intricate investigation into how CO2 and H2O interact with coal at varying temperatures, offering promising avenues for enhancing the efficiency [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a groundbreaking study that merges the intricacies of geochemistry and energy engineering, researchers have unveiled new insights into the complex interplay between thermal and chemical effects on coal permeability. This revelation emerges from an intricate investigation into how CO2 and H2O interact with coal at varying temperatures, offering promising avenues for enhancing the efficiency of carbon sequestration and unconventional resource extraction.</p>
<p>Coal permeability, a critical parameter governing the fluid flow and gas migration within coal seams, is influenced by both physical and chemical stimuli. The recent study by Shi, Lin, Liu, and their team meticulously dissects the competitive mechanisms arising from thermal and chemical effects during the CO2-H2O-coal interaction. This multidisciplinary research aims to quantify and elucidate how these competing processes influence permeability enhancement, which is pivotal for optimizing enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon dioxide storage strategies.</p>
<p>Thermal effects primarily refer to how temperature elevation alters the coal matrix structure, potentially expanding pore networks and microfractures. Such thermal stimulation can physically microfracture the coal or increase molecular mobility, thus facilitating enhanced permeability. Conversely, chemical effects relate to the reactive processes between the aqueous CO2 solution and coal minerals. These reactions can modify mineral composition, cause dissolution or precipitation reactions, and significantly alter pore structures and surface properties at a micro level.</p>
<p>The study’s innovative approach involved systematically varying the interaction temperature to observe changes in coal permeability under the joint influence of CO2 and H2O. This experimental framework mirrors the subsurface environment where CO2 injection for sequestration or enhanced methane recovery occurs. The researchers employed advanced imaging techniques and permeability measurement methods to capture the nuanced effects of temperature on chemical reactions and physical changes within the coal matrix.</p>
<p>One of the key findings highlighted the dominance of thermal effects at higher temperatures, where pore expansion due to thermal stress played a major role in increasing permeability. However, as the temperature increased, chemical reactions accelerated, sometimes leading to mineral precipitation that could clog pores, thus counteracting the thermal enhancements. This competitive balance underscores the non-linear and complex nature of permeability evolution in coal seams subjected to CO2-H2O exposure.</p>
<p>This research illuminates the delicate balance between permeability enhancements due to thermal expansion and the potential reductions caused by chemical mineral transformations. Understanding this balance is crucial for predicting the behavior of coal reservoirs during CO2 injection. This knowledge enables engineers to tailor injection protocols that maximize permeability improvements while mitigating adverse chemical clogging effects, potentially transforming energy recovery and carbon storage methodologies.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the study’s temperature-dependent findings estimate thresholds beyond which chemical effects begin to negate thermal benefits, providing a temperature window ideal for permeability enhancement. These insights can influence operational parameters, such as injection temperature and pressure, which determine the efficacy and longevity of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and CO2 sequestration projects.</p>
<p>From a broader perspective, the research highlights the synergistic nature of thermal and chemical processes within geological formations, offering a template for understanding similar phenomena in other subsurface reservoirs. This could extend to geothermal fields, hydrocarbon plays, and even the long-term fate of injected fluids in underground storage facilities, ultimately bridging gaps between fundamental science and applied energy solutions.</p>
<p>The implications of this study are profound in the context of global climate change and sustainable energy transition. Enhanced recovery of coalbed methane using CO2 injection is seen as a dual-purpose strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while tapping residual energy resources. The optimization of permeability through controlled thermal and chemical stimulations could significantly improve the efficiency and safety of such operations.</p>
<p>In addition to permeability implications, the interplay of temperature and chemical reactions can affect the mechanical stability of coal seams. The potential for mineral dissolution and precipitation cycles can cause changes in stress distribution within the rock matrix, influencing fracture propagation and deformation. This holistic understanding is vital for preventing unintended seismicity or reservoir damage during injection operations.</p>
<p>Some of the intriguing methodologies employed in the study included the use of real coal samples subjected to in situ-like conditions replicating deep subsurface environments. By combining laboratory experiments with microscopic and spectroscopic analyses, the researchers could decipher structural and compositional evolutions over a temperature gradient, linking these to observable permeability trends with high precision.</p>
<p>The researchers also employed theoretical modeling to simulate the coupled thermal-chemical-mechanical processes affecting permeability. Such modeling offers predictive capabilities that can be integrated into reservoir simulation tools, aiding in the design of more efficient CO2 injection schemes that optimize coal seam permeability while ensuring long-term storage security.</p>
<p>Future research directions inspired by this study include exploring the kinetics of specific chemical reactions under varying redox conditions and fluid compositions. This could further refine the understanding of how molecular-scale interactions translate into macroscopic permeability changes. Additionally, the role of coal rank and heterogeneity in modulating these competitive mechanisms is a fertile ground for exploration.</p>
<p>Beyond the immediate applications to coal seam reservoirs, the insights gained resonate with broader energy and environmental challenges, particularly the interplay of thermal and chemical processes in subsurface environments undergoing human intervention. This nexus offers a compelling research frontier with the potential for cross-disciplinary innovation spanning geosciences, chemical engineering, and environmental sustainability.</p>
<p>This seminal study represents a significant leap forward in deciphering the nuanced and dynamic interactions governing fluid flow in coal reservoirs subjected to CO2-H2O exposure under thermal stimulation. It paves the way for smarter, science-based approaches to enhancing permeability, thereby supporting global efforts to harness cleaner energy sources and mitigate carbon emissions.</p>
<p>By comprehensively unraveling these competitive mechanisms, Shi and colleagues have contributed essential knowledge that could accelerate the deployment of carbon capture and storage technologies. Their findings underscore the importance of integrating chemical and thermal considerations in subsurface engineering, ultimately advancing the frontier of sustainable energy technologies with a firm grounding in cutting-edge Earth science research.</p>
<p>Subject of Research: The study investigates the competitive mechanisms of thermal and chemical effects on coal permeability influenced by CO2-H2O interaction temperature.</p>
<p>Article Title: Competitive mechanisms of thermal and chemical permeability enhancement effects under the influence of CO2-H2O-coal interaction temperature.</p>
<p>Article References:<br />
Shi, Y., Lin, B., Liu, T. et al. Competitive mechanisms of thermal and chemical permeability enhancement effects under the influence of CO2-H2O-coal interaction temperature. Environ Earth Sci 84, 570 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-025-12603-8</p>
<p>Image Credits: AI Generated</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">88352</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
