<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>endosymbiont &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/endosymbiont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 16:20:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Heartworm&#8217;s Bacterial Partner Lingers After Doxycycline Therapy in Brazilian Dogs</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/heartworms-bacterial-partner-lingers-after-doxycycline-therapy-in-brazilian-dogs/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Thompson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 16:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial endosymbionts in parasitic worms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canine heartworm disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnostic implications of persistent Wolbachia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital PCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dirofilaria immitis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doxycycline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doxycycline antibiotic therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endosymbiont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[field conditions affecting heartworm treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heartworm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heartworm management challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heartworm treatment in dogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of doxycycline on heartworm bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications for parasite viability and transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macrocyclic lactones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microfilariae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parasites & Vectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rio de Janeiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow-kill protocol for heartworm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterinary parasitology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolbachia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolbachia bacteria in heartworms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolbachia persistence after treatment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=241930</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A field study in Rio de Janeiro State found that Wolbachia DNA persisted in six of 31 heartworm-positive dogs 90 days after a standard doxycycline course, even as the antibiotic cleared the endosymbiont in most animals.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the humid municipalities of Rio de Janeiro State, where the mosquito-borne heartworm <em>Dirofilaria immitis</em> circulates among companion dogs, a team of veterinary parasitologists has uncovered a finding that complicates one of the most widely used strategies in heartworm management. Doxycycline, an antibiotic that targets <em>Wolbachia</em>, the obligate bacterial endosymbiont living inside heartworms, is a cornerstone of the so-called slow-kill protocol and of pre-treatment regimens before adulticide therapy. The new study, published in the open-access journal Parasites &amp; Vectors, shows that in a cohort of naturally infected dogs treated with doxycycline alone, genetic material from <em>Wolbachia</em> could still be detected in a subset of animals a full 90 days after the course of therapy ended. The result raises questions about how completely the antibiotic eliminates its bacterial target under real-world field conditions, and what that incompleteness might mean for parasite viability, transmission, and the interpretation of diagnostic tests.</p>
<p>The biological rationale for targeting <em>Wolbachia</em> is well established. These intracellular alpha-proteobacteria are not passive passengers; they are essential partners without which filarial nematodes cannot develop normally, reproduce, or remain viable over the long term. Depleting <em>Wolbachia</em> with tetracycline-class antibiotics such as doxycycline therefore undermines the worm itself, sterilizing adult females, shortening adult lifespan, and reducing the inflammatory pathology associated with dead and dying parasites. Because of these effects, veterinary guidelines commonly recommend doxycycline as an adjunct to melarsomine adulticide treatment and as the central component of slower, less intensive protocols for dogs that cannot tolerate adulticide therapy. The assumption underlying these recommendations is that an adequate doxycycline course reliably drives <em>Wolbachia</em> burdens down to undetectable levels, at least within the circulating microfilariae that are easiest to sample and quantify.</p>
<p>To test that assumption quantitatively, the researchers enrolled microfilaremic, heartworm-positive dogs identified in municipalities within the target areas of Rio de Janeiro State. Owners agreed to blood draws on day 0 and again on days 60 and 90, with a five-day window around each scheduled time point, and to administer doxycycline at 10 milligrams per kilogram twice daily for 28 days. Weekly telephone follow-up calls were used to help ensure that owners maintained the dosing schedule, an important consideration in any field study where incomplete compliance could confound the results. Critically, none of the enrolled dogs received any macrocyclic lactone, the class of preventive drugs that includes ivermectin, milbemycin, and moxidectin, at any point during the study. This design choice isolated the effect of doxycycline alone, which is precisely the scenario about which the least controlled field data exist.</p>
<p>The analytical approach combined classical parasitology with modern molecular quantification. On each experimental day, blood samples were subjected to the modified Knott&#8217;s test, the long-standing gold-standard technique for detecting and counting microfilariae, the larval offspring of adult female worms that circulate in the bloodstream. A portion of each sample was retained and frozen at minus 20 degrees Celsius for archival purposes, while the remainder was submitted for digital PCR, a technology that partitions each sample into thousands of microscopic reactions and counts target molecules individually. Digital PCR offers an advantage over conventional quantitative PCR in that it provides absolute counts of DNA copies without the need for standard curves, making it well suited to tracking changes in the ratio of <em>Wolbachia</em> DNA to <em>D. immitis</em> DNA within the same blood sample over time.</p>
<p>Thirty-one microfilaremic dogs completed the study, and 27 of them remained microfilaremic throughout the entire observation period. That persistence of circulating larvae in the vast majority of animals is itself noteworthy, because it confirms that doxycycline monotherapy, at least over a 90-day horizon, does not clear microfilaremia in most naturally infected dogs. The more striking molecular result concerned the endosymbiont. By day 90, <em>Wolbachia</em> had been cleared to undetectable levels in 25 of the 31 dogs, demonstrating that the 10 milligrams per kilogram twice-daily dose was fully effective in those cases and that the treatment protocol, as delivered, was capable of eliminating the symbiont from the circulating parasite population in most animals.</p>
<p>But six dogs told a different story. In these animals, digital PCR remained positive for <em>Wolbachia</em> DNA at the quantitative assessment, indicating that the endosymbiont&#8217;s genetic material persisted in the bloodstream months after the antibiotic course had ended. The proportions of <em>Wolbachia</em> relative to <em>D. immitis</em> DNA on days 60 and 90 were significantly lower than on day 0, with a p-value below 0.0001, confirming that the treatment did produce a dramatic overall reduction in the symbiont burden even in these persistent cases. When the researchers compared the day 60 and day 90 proportions directly, however, the difference was not statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.3127. In other words, between day 60 and day 90 the relative <em>Wolbachia</em> burden in the persistent dogs plateaued rather than continuing to decline, suggesting that whatever residual signal remained was not being progressively eliminated during the final month of observation.</p>
<p>The authors are careful about interpretation, and their caution is instructive. They note that the data may reflect the absence of macrocyclic lactone use in the cohort, since these preventive drugs kill microfilariae directly and would be expected to remove the larval population in which residual <em>Wolbachia</em> DNA might reside. Alternatively, dogs carrying higher adult worm burdens might simply harbor more symbiont-containing material than a standard doxycycline course can fully deplete. Yet the team explicitly acknowledges that it is not possible to confidently conclude that these factors entirely underpin the observations. The residual DNA signal could represent dead or dying bacteria whose genetic material has not yet been cleared from host tissues, or it could indicate genuinely surviving <em>Wolbachia</em> in a subset of worms or in a subpopulation of the symbiont itself. Distinguishing between these possibilities matters enormously, because DNA persistence from dead organisms is biologically benign, whereas surviving symbionts could repopulate their hosts once antibiotic pressure is removed.</p>
<p>This ambiguity leads directly to the study&#8217;s most important recommendation: further research should investigate whether the persistence is related to a lack of efficacy of doxycycline against certain <em>Wolbachia</em> subpopulations or to other, still unidentified factors. The idea of resistant or tolerant symbiont subpopulations is not far-fetched. Bacteria exposed to bacteriostatic drugs such as tetracyclines can enter low-metabolic states that permit survival, and genetic variation among <em>Wolbachia</em> strains infecting different worm individuals, or even different tissues within a single worm, could produce heterogeneous drug susceptibility. If a subpopulation of <em>Wolbachia</em> can withstand a full standard course of doxycycline, the implications extend beyond this single cohort, potentially affecting the reliability of doxycycline-based protocols in regions where such regimens are the only practical option for infected dogs.</p>
<p>For practicing veterinarians and pet owners, the study&#8217;s findings should be read as a call for measured reevaluation rather than alarm. The treatment was demonstrably effective in the majority of dogs, and even in the six persistent animals the symbiont burden fell dramatically and remained suppressed. What the study challenges is the assumption that a standard doxycycline course uniformly and permanently eliminates <em>Wolbachia</em> from every treated animal, particularly when no macrocyclic lactone is administered concurrently. It also highlights the value of digital PCR as a surveillance tool, since conventional microscopy of microfilariae would have revealed nothing about the symbiont status of these animals. As heartworm-endemic regions expand and drug-resistant parasite populations emerge, understanding the durability of the doxycycline-<em>Wolbachia</em> axis becomes increasingly consequential. The Rio de Janeiro cohort, small as it is, provides a quantitative baseline for that conversation and a clear agenda for the studies that must follow.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Persistence of Wolbachia endosymbiont DNA in heartworm-infected dogs after doxycycline-only treatment</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Persistence of Wolbachia DNA in Dirofilaria immitis-infected canines after doxycycline-only treatment in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Carithers, D., Alberigi, B., Scott, F., Mendes-de-Almeida, F., Borges, D., Labarthe, N., Brandão, Y., Cunha, R. S., de Souza Ramos, E. A., Molento, M., Yoon, S., McCall, J., &amp; Harrington, J. (2026). Persistence of Wolbachia DNA in Dirofilaria immitis-infected canines after doxycycline-only treatment in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. <em>Parasites &amp;amp; Vectors</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07621-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07621-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07621-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s13071-026-07621-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Wolbachia, Dirofilaria immitis, heartworm, doxycycline, dogs, digital PCR, microfilariae, Rio de Janeiro, veterinary parasitology, macrocyclic lactones, endosymbiont, Parasites &amp; Vectors</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">241930</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden Wolbachia Patterns in Hawaiian Mosquitoes Could Shape Future Virus Control</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hidden-wolbachia-patterns-in-hawaiian-mosquitoes-could-shape-future-virus-control/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristina Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 01:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aedes albopictus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological control of invasive Aedes albopictus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chikungunya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cytoplasmic incompatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cytoplasmic incompatibility in insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dengue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dengue and Zika virus transmission prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological implications of Wolbachia infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endosymbiont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaiʻi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaiian mosquito populations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impacts of Wolbachia on mosquito reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive species in Pacific islands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosquito control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosquito vector control methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosquito-borne disease management strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pathogen-blocking properties of Wolbachia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantitative PCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolbachia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zika]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=232882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A survey of nearly 400 Asian tiger mosquitoes in Hawaiʻi reveals that nearly all carry the Wolbachia strain wAlbB while only about a third carry wAlbA, a skewed infection pattern that could complicate future Wolbachia-based mosquito control efforts.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus, is one of the most consequential invasive insects in the Pacific, capable of transmitting dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses to human populations that historically had little exposure to these diseases. Across the Hawaiian Islands, where the species has become firmly established, public health planners are increasingly looking toward biological control strategies that exploit a common bacterial symbiont called Wolbachia. A new study published in the journal Parasites &amp; Vectors has now provided the most detailed picture yet of how Wolbachia naturally infects Aedes albopictus populations on two Hawaiian islands, and the results reveal patterns that are more complicated than researchers expected.</p>
<p>Wolbachia is an intracellular bacterium that manipulates the reproduction of its insect hosts, most famously through a phenomenon known as cytoplasmic incompatibility. When males carrying a particular Wolbachia strain mate with females that either lack that strain or carry a different one, their fertilized eggs fail to hatch. This quirk of reproductive biology has become the foundation of several mosquito control approaches, including the incompatible insect technique, in which large numbers of Wolbachia-carrying male mosquitoes are released to mate with wild females and crash the population. Wolbachia also has pathogen-blocking properties, meaning it can interfere with the ability of mosquitoes to transmit viruses such as dengue, which underlies replacement strategies that spread virus-resistant Wolbachia strains through wild populations.</p>
<p>Unlike Aedes aegypti, the yellow fever mosquito, which does not naturally harbor Wolbachia, Aedes albopictus carries two native strains of the bacterium, designated wAlbA and wAlbB. In most populations studied elsewhere, individuals are superinfected, meaning they carry both strains simultaneously. This natural dual infection matters enormously for control programs because the outcome of any cytoplasmic incompatibility-based intervention depends on which strains are already circulating in the target population. If wild mosquitoes carry unexpected combinations of strains, or if the density of the bacteria in their tissues varies in unanticipated ways, releases of incompatible males may fail to suppress reproduction as intended.</p>
<p>Despite the global importance of these questions, the infection status of Hawaiian Aedes albopictus had remained poorly characterized. A research team led by Sangwoo Seok and senior authors Eric P. Caragata and Yoosook Lee of the Florida Medical Entomology Laboratory at the University of Florida, working with collaborators from state and federal agencies in Hawaiʻi and the University of California, set out to fill this gap. Using quantitative PCR, a laboratory technique that can detect and precisely quantify the amount of bacterial DNA in an individual mosquito, the team characterized Wolbachia infections in 399 specimens collected from two islands: Oʻahu and the Island of Hawaiʻi.</p>
<p>The headline finding was that Wolbachia is nearly universal in these populations: 98.5 percent of the mosquitoes tested were infected. However, the composition of those infections was strikingly lopsided. Every infected specimen carried wAlbB, but only 28.6 percent were superinfected with wAlbA. In other words, the vast majority of Hawaiian Aedes albopictus carry only a single Wolbachia strain, a pattern that departs from the double infection typically assumed for this species. This lower-than-expected prevalence of wAlbA establishes an important baseline for any future biocontrol effort in the region, because it means the resident bacterial landscape is not uniform across individuals.</p>
<p>The study also revealed that infection dynamics are strongly shaped by the sex of the mosquito. Females were significantly more likely than males to harbor wAlbA, and bacterial density, the quantity of Wolbachia per individual, was significantly higher in females for both strains. This sex bias has practical implications because only female mosquitoes bite and transmit viruses, and because cytoplasmic incompatibility manifests through the interaction between infected males and uninfected or differently infected females. A sex-skewed distribution of native strains therefore changes the arithmetic of any release program designed around mating incompatibility.</p>
<p>Environmental factors also left their mark on the bacterial communities. The prevalence of wAlbA was associated with the island of collection and with precipitation at the collection site, suggesting that local climate and geography influence which mosquitoes carry the second strain. By contrast, the prevalence of wAlbB did not vary significantly with sex, island, temperature, or precipitation, indicating that the two native strains respond to different ecological pressures. Temperature is known from laboratory studies to affect Wolbachia density, and rainfall shapes breeding habitat availability, so these field associations provide a real-world counterpart to experimental work on how environmental conditions modulate symbiont infections.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most technically intriguing results concern the interactions between the two strains when they coexist in the same mosquito. In superinfected individuals, wAlbB consistently exhibited higher density than wAlbA, and wAlbB density was higher in superinfected mosquitoes than in those carrying wAlbB alone. Both strains reached higher densities in females than in males. In females, the densities of the two strains were positively correlated, meaning mosquitoes with more wAlbA also tended to have more wAlbB, whereas no such correlation existed in males. These sex-specific microbe-microbe dynamics suggest that the two symbionts do not simply compete for host resources; their relationship differs fundamentally between the sexes, possibly reflecting differences in tissue tropism, vertical transmission requirements, or host physiology.</p>
<p>For the design of Wolbachia-based control in Hawaiʻi, these findings carry a clear warning. Population suppression projects that rely on cytoplasmic incompatibility depend on predictable mating outcomes between released and wild mosquitoes. If a substantial fraction of wild females carry only wAlbB while released males carry both strains or a different combination, the strength of incompatibility may vary across the population, diluting the effectiveness of releases. Similarly, the sex and site-specific variation in bacterial density could influence how faithfully the released strains are transmitted to the next generation. The authors emphasize that future projects in the region must account for these varying patterns of infection before strategies are developed and implemented, rather than assuming a uniform superinfection across the archipelago.</p>
<p>The study, funded in part by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency&#8217;s Science to Achieve Results program, the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, and the National Institutes of Health, and conducted with permits from Hawaiʻi&#8217;s national parks, demonstrates the value of baseline surveillance before intervention. As Hawaiʻi confronts recurring outbreaks of dengue and the expanding range of mosquito vectors in a warming climate, understanding the invisible bacterial passengers of its mosquitoes has become a practical necessity. The nearly universal presence of wAlbB, the patchy distribution of wAlbA, and the complex density relationships between the strains together form a map of the biological terrain on which any future Wolbachia campaign will be fought, and this research provides the first careful survey of that terrain across the Hawaiian Islands.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Native Wolbachia infection prevalence and density in Hawaiian Aedes albopictus mosquito populations</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Native Wolbachia infection dynamics across Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) populations in Hawaiʻi</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Seok, S., Salama, L., Vorsino, A. E., Leong, M. K. H., Haines, W. P., Jacobsen, C. M., Akbari, O. S., Caragata, E. P., &amp; Lee, Y. (2026). Native Wolbachia infection dynamics across Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) populations in Hawaiʻi. <em>Parasites &amp;amp; Vectors</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07695-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07695-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07695-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s13071-026-07695-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Wolbachia, Aedes albopictus, Hawaiʻi, cytoplasmic incompatibility, mosquito control, dengue, Zika, chikungunya, endosymbiont, quantitative PCR, invasive species, vector biology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">232882</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Common Bacterium Found Widespread in Italian Sand Flies Could Aid Disease Control</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/common-bacterium-found-widespread-in-italian-sand-flies-could-aid-disease-control/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 02:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological control of sand fly vectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endosymbiont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entomology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insecticide resistance in sand flies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leishmaniasis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leishmaniasis transmission in Mediterranean region]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MLST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-locus sequence typing of Wolbachia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanopore sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural Wolbachia infection in wild insect populations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parasites & Vectors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phlebotomus perniciosus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phlebotomus perniciosus sand fly vector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of Wolbachia in insect reproduction manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sand flies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sand fly-borne disease control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sand fly-borne viruses and parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector-borne disease prevention strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolbachia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolbachia bacterial endosymbiont in sand flies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=225162</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A three-year survey of sand flies in Northern Italy found that nearly 40 percent carry a single Wolbachia Supergroup B strain, the first MLST characterization in Phlebotomus perniciosus and a step toward biological control of sand fly-borne diseases.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A widespread survey of wild sand flies in Northern Italy has revealed that nearly four in ten of these disease-carrying insects carry Wolbachia, a bacterial endosymbiont famous for its ability to manipulate the reproduction of its insect hosts. The finding, published in the journal Parasites &amp; Vectors, marks the first multi-locus sequence typing characterization of Wolbachia in Phlebotomus perniciosus, the principal sand fly vector of leishmaniasis and other pathogens in the Mediterranean region. Because Wolbachia can interfere with the capacity of insects to transmit viruses, parasites, and other microbes, documenting its natural occurrence in sand fly populations is a critical first step toward evaluating whether it could be harnessed as a biological control tool against sand fly-borne diseases.</p>
<p>Sand flies are small, hairy flies of the subfamily Phlebotominae whose blood-feeding females transmit a range of pathogens, most notably Leishmania parasites, as well as phleboviruses such as those causing sand fly fever. More than one billion people live in areas where they are exposed to sand fly-borne infections, and with no effective human vaccines available for most of these diseases, vector control remains the principal line of defense. Traditional measures such as insecticide spraying face growing challenges from resistance and environmental concerns, prompting researchers to explore alternative strategies. Among the most promising of these is the use of Wolbachia, an intracellular bacterium that infects an enormous range of arthropods and can be deployed to suppress mosquito populations or reduce their ability to transmit pathogens such as dengue and Zika viruses.</p>
<p>Despite the success of Wolbachia-based approaches in mosquitoes, surprisingly little is known about the bacterium&#8217;s natural presence in sand flies. This gap in knowledge motivated a team of researchers at the Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell&#8217;Emilia-Romagna in Brescia, led by Maya Carrera and colleagues, to undertake a systematic survey of Wolbachia infections in wild-caught sand flies across Northern Italy. The study, conducted between 2023 and 2025, set out to determine not only how common the bacterium is in these populations but also which genetic types of Wolbachia are circulating, information that is essential for judging whether the endosymbiont is already interacting with local vector populations in ways that could be exploited.</p>
<p>The fieldwork covered 24 collection sites distributed across Northern Italy, a region where sand fly activity is seasonal and where Phlebotomus perniciosus dominates the vector community. The researchers deployed two complementary trapping methods: CO2-baited traps, which mimic the breath of vertebrate hosts and attract host-seeking females, and CDC light traps, a standard tool for sampling nocturnal flying insects. Captured specimens were pooled according to sex, collection site, and date, a pooling strategy that balances the practical constraints of molecular screening with the need to estimate infection prevalence across a large sample. Male sand flies, which can be identified by examining morphological features of their genitalia and other structures, were identified to species under the microscope, while females, which are harder to distinguish morphologically, were screened directly for Wolbachia DNA using polymerase chain reaction, or PCR.</p>
<p>The scale of the sampling effort was considerable. In total, 1,158 male sand flies were morphologically identified, revealing seven species in the region. Phlebotomus perniciosus was by far the most abundant, accounting for 751 specimens, followed by P. perfiliewi, P. neglectus, P. ariasi, Sergentomyia minuta, P. mascittii, and P. papatasi. For the molecular screening, 1,937 sand flies were divided into 124 pools, including 10 male pools that could not be assigned to a species morphologically. When these pools were tested for Wolbachia, the results were striking: the overall prevalence of infection was 38.7 percent, a remarkably high figure for a vector group in which Wolbachia had been considered rare or poorly documented.</p>
<p>Prevalence was not static across the study period. In 2023, 44.9 percent of the screened pools tested positive for the bacterium. The following year, the figure dropped to 21.3 percent, less than half the initial rate, before rebounding sharply to 57.1 percent in 2025. This year-to-year variation suggests that Wolbachia infection dynamics in sand fly populations are influenced by fluctuating ecological conditions, whether climatic, related to host population structure, or driven by other factors that the study was not designed to disentangle. Understanding what drives these swings will be important for any future attempt to model or manipulate the bacterium&#8217;s spread through wild populations.</p>
<p>To characterize the Wolbachia strains genetically, the team amplified five housekeeping genes used in the standard multi-locus sequence typing scheme for the bacterium: coxA, fbpA, ftsZ, gatB, and hcpA. Because Wolbachia is classified into supergroups based on such sequence data, this approach allows precise assignment of strains to evolutionary lineages. In addition, the researchers amplified the cytochrome oxidase I gene, or COI, a widely used DNA barcoding marker, to confirm the identity of the host sand flies, and for four samples they also sequenced a partial fragment of the wsp gene, which encodes a Wolbachia surface protein. Samples for which all target genes were successfully amplified were then subjected to nanopore sequencing, a long-read technology that enables rapid and relatively inexpensive generation of sequence data.</p>
<p>The genetic results were unambiguous and, in one respect, quite unexpected. Complete MLST profiles were obtained for 11 samples, and every one of them belonged to Wolbachia Supergroup B, one of the major divisions of the bacterium. COI barcoding confirmed that all 11 infected hosts were Phlebotomus perniciosus. More remarkable still, all 11 sequenced Wolbachia shared an identical sequence type, despite having been collected across different years and from different habitats within the study region. This genetic uniformity points to a single, well-established strain circulating in P. perniciosus populations across Northern Italy, rather than a diverse community of unrelated infections. When the researchers compared this profile against public sequence databases, they found no exact match; the closest known profile came from the confused flour beetle, Tribolium confusum, hinting at possible evolutionary links between the sand fly strain and Wolbachia found in other insect hosts.</p>
<p>The significance of these findings extends beyond basic microbiology. Wolbachia&#8217;s appeal as a control agent rests on two well-documented phenomena. The first is cytoplasmic incompatibility, a reproductive manipulation in which males carrying certain Wolbachia strains can only successfully breed with females carrying the same or a compatible strain, a mechanism that can be exploited to suppress populations or to drive desirable traits through a population. The second is the ability of some strains to reduce vector competence, meaning the infected insect becomes less able to support and transmit pathogens. Both mechanisms have been deployed successfully against Aedes mosquitoes in programs targeting dengue. Whether the Supergroup B strain found in P. perniciosus exhibits similar properties is not yet known, but the new study provides the essential baseline: researchers now know which strain is present, how common it is, and that it persists stably across years and habitats.</p>
<p>The authors emphasize that this work is a foundation rather than a conclusion. Future studies will need to examine the effects of the identified Wolbachia strain on sand fly reproduction, survival, and, crucially, vector competence for Leishmania parasites and phleboviruses. The demonstration that a single, genetically uniform strain infects a large fraction of the most important sand fly vector in Northern Italy raises the possibility that natural Wolbachia infections could already be influencing transmission dynamics in the region, or that they could be augmented through release strategies similar to those used against mosquitoes. As climate change and land-use shifts continue to expand the range of sand flies and the diseases they carry, tools that can complement or replace chemical insecticides will only grow in importance. This survey of Italian sand flies offers a detailed genetic portrait of a candidate ally hiding within the insects themselves, and it opens a concrete path toward testing whether that ally can be turned against the pathogens the flies transmit.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Wolbachia endosymbiont infections in wild sand fly populations in Northern Italy</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Phylogenetic insights into Wolbachia natural infections in sand flies of Northern Italy</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Carrera, M., Bertasio, C., Carta, V., Marelli, A., Muratore, R., Tolini, C., Lelli, D., Sozzi, E., Moreno, A., &amp; Defilippo, F. (2026). Phylogenetic insights into Wolbachia natural infections in sand flies of Northern Italy. <em>Parasites &amp;amp; Vectors</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07578-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07578-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07578-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s13071-026-07578-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Wolbachia, sand flies, Phlebotomus perniciosus, leishmaniasis, vector control, MLST, nanopore sequencing, Italy, endosymbiont, biological control, Parasites &amp; Vectors, entomology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">225162</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a Sneaky Bacterium Hijacks the Sex Lives of Rice&#8217;s Worst Pests</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/how-a-sneaky-bacterium-hijacks-the-sex-lives-of-rices-worst-pests/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 22:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B vitamins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biocontrol potential of Wolbachia in rice ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological control of rice planthoppers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cif genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cytoplasmic incompatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endosymbiont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fecundity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of intracellular bacteria on insect reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laodelphax striatellus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial symbionts influencing pest outbreak dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nilaparvata lugens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pest control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive manipulation of rice pests by symbionts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice planthoppers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of bacteria in pest reproductive biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sogatella furcifera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strategies for controlling devastating rice pests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable pest management in rice agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral disease transmission by rice planthoppers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolbachia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolbachia bacteria in rice pest control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wolbachia-induced sex ratio distortion in insect pests]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=219722</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review reveals how the endosymbiotic bacterium Wolbachia manipulates reproduction in three major rice planthopper pests through cytoplasmic incompatibility and fecundity enhancement, opening avenues for symbiont-based pest control.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A microscopic bacterium that lives inside the cells of some of the world&#8217;s most destructive rice pests may hold the key to controlling them. A new review published in the journal Crop Health by researchers at Nanjing Agricultural University brings together decades of evidence on how Wolbachia, an intracellular symbiont found in a large share of the world&#8217;s insects, manipulates the reproduction of three devastating rice planthoppers: the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens, the small brown planthopper Laodelphax striatellus, and the white-backed planthopper Sogatella furcifera. These insects pierce and suck the sap of rice stems, lay eggs inside plant tissue, and transmit serious viral diseases, making them among the most consequential agricultural pests in Asia. Understanding how a bacterial passenger bends their reproductive biology to its own ends is now revealing both the mechanics of pest outbreaks and a potential route to sustainable control.</p>
<p>Wolbachia is famous among biologists for its extraordinary reproductive tricks. Because it is transmitted only from mothers to offspring through the egg cytoplasm, the bacterium has evolved an arsenal of strategies to favor infected females at the expense of males and uninfected individuals. It can kill infected males outright, convert genetically male embryos into females, induce females to reproduce without mating, and, most famously, trigger cytoplasmic incompatibility, or CI. In CI, when a Wolbachia-infected male mates with an uninfected female, or with a female carrying a different Wolbachia strain, the fertilized eggs die during embryonic development. If, however, the female carries the same strain, her eggs can rescue the paternal chromosomes and development proceeds normally. The net effect is that infected females enjoy a reproductive advantage, and the bacterium sweeps through populations on the back of this manipulation.</p>
<p>The review&#8217;s central insight is that the three rice planthopper species host strikingly different Wolbachia strains with very different effects. In the brown planthopper, the native strain wLug infects fewer than half of individuals in the field, and rather than inducing CI it appears to boost the fecundity of its host. In the small brown planthopper, by contrast, the strain wStri infects roughly ninety-nine percent of wild populations and induces complete cytoplasmic incompatibility while simultaneously enhancing reproduction. The white-backed planthopper&#8217;s strain, wSfur, infects about ninety percent of individuals but shows weak or no CI and only minimal effects on fecundity. These strain-specific differences matter enormously for population dynamics, because the reproductive effects of the bacterium directly alter the base population size of the insects and therefore influence the scale of planthopper infestations in the field.</p>
<p>One of the most intriguing findings concerns what happens when a Wolbachia strain is moved into a new host species. Researchers successfully transfected wStri from the small brown planthopper into the brown planthopper, where the bacterium adopted a tissue distribution similar to that in its native host but reached significantly higher densities than the native wLug strain. Although wStri still induced cytoplasmic incompatibility in its new home, the intensity of the effect was notably reduced. This observation carries an important message: the strength of CI is shaped not only by the symbiont itself but also by the genetic background of the host. The transfection also had a practical payoff, because the introduced wStri inhibited infection and transmission of rice ragged stunt virus in the brown planthopper, hinting at significant pest control potential.</p>
<p>At the molecular level, the mechanism of cytoplasmic incompatibility has only recently come into focus. Because Wolbachia cannot be cultured outside living cells, identifying the bacterial factors behind CI long remained a stubborn challenge. The breakthrough came with the discovery of two adjacent genes, cifA and cifB, encoding proteins that appear to be the key effectors. In transgenic experiments in fruit flies, expressing CifB and CifA in uninfected males was sufficient to reproduce the CI phenotype, with embryos dying after mating with uninfected females. Conversely, expressing CifA alone in uninfected females rescued embryos from Wolbachia-infected males. Mutations in the PD-(D/E)XK nuclease, deubiquitinase, and peptidase domains of CifB impair the function of these factors, and the three-dimensional structures of the two proteins have now been resolved, revealing that their interaction depends on charge attraction across three interfacial regions.</p>
<p>Two competing models attempt to explain how these proteins work. The toxin-antidote model proposes that CifB is delivered to the embryo, where it acts as a toxin, while Wolbachia in the egg synthesizes CifA, which binds CifB and neutralizes it, allowing normal development. The host modification model instead holds that Cif proteins modify targets within the gametes themselves: modifications to sperm induce CI, while modifications to female gametes reverse the damage and rescue embryos. Recent functional studies lend weight to the modification model. CifA has been detected in sperm nuclei during spermatogenesis, where it causes retention of histones and deficiency of protamines in mature sperm, and both CifA and CifB have been shown to act as nucleases that degrade long non-coding RNAs and damage DNA during late sperm formation. Notably, the rules differ across strains: in some systems CifB alone suffices to induce CI, while in others both proteins must be expressed together, underscoring how diverse these mechanisms remain.</p>
<p>The wStri genome adds another layer of complexity. It contains three copies of the cifA-cifB gene pair, and phylogenetic analysis shows that the known CI factor groups have expanded from five to ten, with the wStri factors belonging to newly identified groups VI and VIII whose functions remain unknown. On the host side, proteomic and RNA interference studies in the small brown planthopper have identified candidate host factors. The cytoplasmic aminopeptidase-like protein, or CAL, appears to be associated with CI lethality, while the gene iLvE, involved in branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis, was the most significantly downregulated gene in infected insects, and knocking it down in uninfected males reduced fertility in a way that could be restored by mating with infected females. Another candidate, NDUFA8, which encodes a subunit of a mitochondrial enzyme complex, was upregulated in infected females, and suppressing it reproduced CI-like embryo mortality, suggesting a role in the rescue phenotype.</p>
<p>Beyond incompatibility, Wolbachia acts as a reproductive booster for its planthopper hosts. Removing the bacterium from brown planthoppers significantly shortens oviposition and reduces female fecundity, and wStri similarly promotes egg production in the small brown planthopper. Comparative genomics and metabolomics show that both wStri and wLug carry complete pathways for synthesizing B vitamins, including biotin and riboflavin, nutrients that play crucial roles in host reproduction and that the insects apparently cannot fully supply themselves. At the physiological level, the bacterium upregulates vitellogenin, the yolk precursor protein essential for egg formation, increases mitotic division of germ cells, and accelerates the breakdown of nurse cells during peak oviposition, thereby channeling more nutrients into egg production. Wolbachia also alters microRNA expression in its host, reshaping the expression of fecundity-related genes, and preliminary evidence suggests changes in mitochondrial energy metabolism may contribute as well.</p>
<p>The picture is further complicated by interactions with other symbionts. In the white-backed planthopper, Wolbachia coexists with another intracellular bacterium, Cardinium, and lines carrying both symbionts show distinct microbiomes and metabolite profiles. Remarkably, double-infected lines exhibit lower fecundity than uninfected ones, indicating that combined symbiont effects can be more consequential than either bacterium alone. For pest management, the implications are considerable. The CI principle underlies incompatible insect technique programs already deployed against mosquitoes, in which males carrying specific Wolbachia strains are released to mate with wild females, causing their fertilized eggs to die and suppressing target populations. Whether similar strategies can be scaled up for rice planthoppers remains an open question, and the review&#8217;s authors caution that field deployment would require careful risk assessment, including the possibility of resistance evolution, ecological side effects, and horizontal transmission of Wolbachia to non-target species. Still, as planthopper outbreaks intensify and pesticide resistance grows, a bacterium that can both sabotage and supercharge insect reproduction may prove to be one of the most valuable allies rice farmers have.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Wolbachia-mediated reproductive manipulation, including cytoplasmic incompatibility and fecundity enhancement, in three rice planthopper pest species</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Wolbachia-mediated reproductive manipulation in rice planthoppers</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Niu, Y.-D., Wang, M.-K., Yan, Z.-C., Bing, X.-L., &amp; Hong, X.-Y. (2025). Wolbachia-mediated reproductive manipulation in rice planthoppers. <em>Crop Health, 3</em>(1), Article 20. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-025-00059-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-025-00059-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-025-00059-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44297-025-00059-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Wolbachia, rice planthoppers, cytoplasmic incompatibility, endosymbiont, Nilaparvata lugens, Laodelphax striatellus, Sogatella furcifera, cif genes, fecundity, pest control, symbiosis, B vitamins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">219722</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
